EG&G PARC - ACS Publications - American Chemical Society

May 31, 2012 - EG&G PARC. Anal. Chem. , 1992, 64 (8), pp 493A–493A. DOI: 10.1021/ac00032a722. Publication Date: April 1992. ACS Legacy Archive...
0 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
with the sample solution and the analyte stacked into a sharp zone. Figure 4a illustrates an experi­ ment where 35 cm of the column was loaded with the sample solution. A great enhancement in detection sen­ sitivity is achieved compared with the conventional sample stacking technique in Figure 4b, where only 1 cm of sample was loaded into the column. Note that no separation will occur if the sample buffer is not re­ moved from the column (Figure 4c). In reality, it is sometimes easier to fill the whole column with the sam­ ple solution and then insert the col­ umn into the high-concentration support buffer reservoir to perform sample stacking. At the beginning of the run, there is no field enhance­ ment because the whole column is filled with sample solution. Conse­ quently, some of the analytes will be carried out of the column by the electroosmotic flow. However, as the high-concentration support buffer slowly replaces the sample buffer in­ side the column, the electric field in the remaining sample buffer region

will begin to increase rapidly, as de­ scribed in Equation 2. As the length of the sample buffer reaches the maximum fill length, given by Equa­ tion 17, the analytes can then mi­ grate opposite to the electroosmotic flow and stack at the rear end of the sample buffer. This technique for whole-column sample stacking is simple and requires no special tools.

Newfangled? Old Fashioned?

Sample stacking in electroinjection

Field-amplified sample injection. The concepts of sample stacking and field amplification can also be ap­ plied to electroinjection (26-29). Electroinjection of samples (prepared in a low-concentration buffer or wa­ ter) into a column filled with a higher concentration of the same buffer re­ sults in an electric field at the injec­ tion point that is much stronger than the electric field in the column ac­ cording to Equation 5. For a short in­ jection time such that χ « 1 and yx « 1, the electric field in the col­ umn changes very little from the original uniform field, and the elec-

HERE'snothingreallynewabouttheEG&G Princeton Applied Research Model 263. Unless you call the analoglook and feel to its inputknobnew... Or, if you call its self-calibration feature new... Or, if you consider its moderate price new!

T

There's nothing old fashioned about the Model 263, either. Unless you consider the EG&G PARC reputation for quality instrumentation old fash­ ioned. Or, the idea of software compatibility old fashioned! You won't be surprised that the new EG&G PARC Model 263 Potentiostat/Galvanostat is a 20 volt compliance, 200 m A instrument with impressive speed, precision, and sensitivity. You can use the frontpanelforstaticorscanningexperiments.You can combine it with our well known software for: •

Research electrochemistry



DC corrosion measurements



Electrochemical impedance measurements

or use the free software called Headstart™to cre­ ate your own experiments. If you are presently a user of an EG&G PARC software package you don't need to learn any newfangled software. The Model 263 uses the same software our other com­ puter controlled potentiostatsuse.

Water-

You will be amazed at the price. But a research quality instrument at a good price isn't a new­ fangled concept... Just an old fashioned bargain!

- Negative species

F

ORMOREINFORMATIONabouttheModel

263 and how you can use electrochemistry to help solve problems, give our Technical Support staff a call at 1-609-530-1000. We can supply you with the newfangled price of theModel 263 along with old fashioned quality and service.

Migration time (min)

Figure 4. Electropherograms showing improvement in sample stacking of an extremely large injection volume. (a) A 35-cm-long sample is loaded into the column and the sample buffer removed, (b) Conventional sample stacking using a 1 -cm-long sample, (c) The same as (a) but without the sample buffer removed. The negative species peak contains both A and B. The sample is a mixture of (A) phenylhydantoin (PTH) and aspartic acid (4 χ 1CT5 M each) and (B) PTH and glutamic acid (3.4 χ 1CT5 M each) prepared in water. Column: 50-μΓη i.d., 100-cm-long, untreated fused-silica capillary; buffer: 100 mM 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES)/100 mM histidine at pH 6.2.

EG&G

PARC

P.O. Box 2565 · Princeton, NJ 08543 · (609) 530-1000 FAX: (609) 883-7259 · TELEX: 843409 United Kingdom 0734/773003 · Canada (416) 475-8420 · Netherlands £1-340248777 Italy 02/7386294 · Germany 089/92692444 ' France 1/60/869366 • Japan 03*38-150

Circle 32 for Literature. Circle 33 for Sales Representative.

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL. 64, NO. 8, APRIL 15, 1992 · 493 A