Subscriber access provided by LAURENTIAN UNIV
Article
Electrochemical production of magnetite nanoparticles for sulfide control in sewers Hui-Wen Lin, Kenny Couvreur, Bogdan C. Donose, Korneel Rabaey, Zhiguo Yuan, and Ilje Pikaar Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01748 • Publication Date (Web): 12 Oct 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on October 12, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 24
1
Environmental Science & Technology
Electrochemical production of magnetite nanoparticles for sulfide control in sewers
2 3
Authors: Hui-Wen Lin1, Kenny Couvreur2, Bogdan C. Donose3, Korneel Rabaey1,2, Zhiguo
4
Yuan1 and Ilje Pikaar1,4*
5 6
1
7
Australia
8
2
9
9000 Ghent, Belgium
The University of Queensland, Advanced Water Management Centre (AWMC), QLD 4072,
Center for Microbial Ecology and Technology (CMET), Ghent University, Coupure Links 653,
10
3
The University of Queensland, The School of Chemical Engineering, QLD 4072, Australia
11
4
The University of Queensland, The School of Civil Engineering, QLD 4072, Australia
12
*Correspondence should be addressed to: Ilje Pikaar, The School of Civil Engineering, The
13
University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
14
Phone: +61 7 3345 1389; E-mail:
[email protected] 15 16
1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
17
Abstract
18
Recently, naturally occurring magnetite (Fe3O4) has emerged as a new material for sulfide
19
control in sewers. However, unrefined magnetite could have high heavy metal contents (e.g. Cr,
20
Zn, Ni, Sn, etc.) and the capacity to remove dissolved sulfide is reasonably limited due to
21
relatively large particle sizes. To overcome the drawbacks of unrefined magnetite we used an
22
electrochemical system with mild steel as sacrificial electrodes to in-situ generate high strength
23
solutions of plate-like magnetite nanoparticles (MNP). MNP with a size range between 120 to
24
160 nm were electrochemically generated at 9.35±0.28 g Fe3O4-Fe/L, resulting in a Coulombic
25
efficiency (CE) for iron oxidation of 93.5±2.8 %. The produced MNP were found to effectively
26
reduce sulfide levels in sewage from 12.7±0.3 to 0.2±0.0 mg S/L at a sulfide-to-MNP ratio of
27
0.26 g S/g Fe3O4-Fe. Subsequently, MNP were continuously generated with polarity switching at
28
stable cell voltage for 31 days at 4.53±0.35 g Fe3O4-Fe/L with a CE for iron oxidation of
29
92.4±7.2 %. The continuously produced MNP reduced sulfide at similar levels to around 0.2 mg
30
S/L at a ratio of 0.28 g S/g Fe3O4-Fe.
31 32
TOC art
33 34 2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 24
Page 3 of 24
Environmental Science & Technology
35
Introduction
36
Generation of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) in sewers by sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) is a notorious
37
problem globally.1-2 H2S is responsible for concrete corrosion of the sewer pipes, releasing
38
obnoxious odours and posing a threat to sewer workers due to its odorous and toxic nature.3-4
39
Currently available sulfide control methods mainly involve chemical addition to sewers to either
40
prevent H2S generation by SRB or mitigate its effect after H2S formation.5 Most commonly used
41
chemicals for sulfide control are addition of sodium hydroxide, magnesium hydroxide, nitrate,
42
iron salts and oxygen.6
43
Magnetite, Fe2+(Fe3+)2O4 or in short Fe3O4, is a mixed-valence ferrimagnetic iron oxide
44
which has been widely applied in several industrial processes, environmental and bio-medical
45
applications.7-11 In a recent study, purchased magnetite powder (a particle size range of 45 to 60
46
µm) reduced the sulfide level in synthetic sewage, thereby showing the feasibility of using
47
magnetite for sulfide control in sewers.12 However, the study suggested that the metal impurities
48
in raw magnetite should be limited to acceptable content in order to minimize the impact on
49
sewage quality.12 Indeed, heavy metal contents (e.g. Cr, Zn, Ni, Sn, etc.) in raw magnetite are
50
reported to be diverse, ranging from 0 to ~100000 ppm.13 Introducing raw and unrefined
51
magnetite into sewers may result in contaminated sludge, reducing its reuse options. Therefore,
52
purified magnetite is a necessity for sewer application. As high-purity magnetite is often high-
53
priced, a new cost-effective method to produce purified magnetite for sulfide control in sewers is
54
needed in order to become a viable and cost effective sulfide control method.
55
Zhang et al.12 showed that with the reported optimal magnetite dosage of 40 mg/L,
56
sulfide concentration was reduced from 6.5 mg/L to 1.3 mg/L (i.e. a 79% sulfide reduction;
57
equivalent to a sulfide removal capacity of 197.3 mg S/g Fe3O4-Fe) over a period of 96 hours.
3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 4 of 24
58
Better sulfide control performance of magnetite is necessary as minor concrete corrosion may
59
already occur at sulfide concentration of 0.1 to 0.5 mg S/L14, which indicates more input of
60
magnetite is needed in order to further lower the sulfide concentration to less than 0.5 mg S/L.
61
However, the study showed that the lowest attainable sulfide concentration using powdered
62
magnetite was around 1.1 mg S/L at magnetite dosage of 60 mg/L, increasing magnetite dosage
63
from 60 to 100 mg/L did not further reduce the sulfide concentration.12 In addition, many studies
64
have indicated that nanoscale magnetite exhibits adsorbent properties and suggested that the
65
smaller the particle size, the higher capacity of magnetite to reduce contaminants (e.g. arsenite,
66
arsenate and phosphate).15-17 Hence, reducing the magnetite particle size from microscale (i.e.
67
purchased magnetite powder; with a particle size range of 45 to 60 µm) to nanoscale is likely to
68
improve its capability of sulfide control, resulting in lower sulfide concentration in sewage.
69
While the majority of the current MNP applications (e.g. rotary shaft sealing, oscillation
70
damping, medical diagnosis, etc.) require the particle size to be smaller than 20 nm7, the
71
application of MNP for sulfide control in sewers is not limited by particle size. Many methods to
72
synthetize MNP have been extensively studied, including electrochemical methods.8,
73
Currently available studies on electrochemical generation of MNP in water were only conducted
74
over a short period (i.e. < 12 hours) and low Fe3O4 strengths (i.e. < 0.71 g Fe3O4-Fe/L) were
75
reported.20-23 In addition, these studies do not investigate the feasibility of the produced MNP for
76
sulfide control. Therefore, this study aimed to demonstrate a cost-effective electrochemical
77
method for production of MNP in water at practical relevant strength (i.e. 5 to 10 g Fe/L) for
78
sulfide control.
18-19
79
Here, short-term batch experiments were carried out to determine the product strength,
80
structural characterisation, morphology, particle size of the produced MNP. Subsequently,
4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 24
Environmental Science & Technology
81
sulfide removal tests were performed to confirm the ability of produced MNP to remove sulfide.
82
In addition, a long-term experiment mimicking on-site operation was carried out, continuously
83
producing MNP over a period of 31 days to determine the feasibility to continuously produce
84
MNP and while remaining its sulfide control capability. Finally, based on the experimental
85
results obtained in this study, we conducted a cost benefit analysis to assess the economic
86
potential. Overall, this study showed the effective sulfide control using in-situ electrochemical
87
generation of MNP.
88 89
Material and methods
90
Electrochemical cell and operation
91
A schematic overview of the experimental setup is given in Figure S1 of the supporting
92
information. Experiments were conducted using single-compartment electrochemical cells made
93
of polycarbonate container (6.5 cm × 15.0 cm) with a volume of 500 mL. Experiments were
94
operated in either batch mode (short-term experiments) or continuous mode (long-term
95
experiment). As studies showed pure MNP could form in NaCl solution20-21, a 2 g/L NaCl
96
solution prepared using tap water was used as the electrolyte in all experiments. Two iron plates
97
(mild steel plat bar, Total Steel Australia) were placed in parallel, with an inter-electrode gap of
98
either 0.4 cm (short-term experiments) or 1.0 cm (long-term experiment), and used as both anode
99
and cathode electrodes. The dimensions of the iron plates were 15.0 cm × 1.4 cm × 0.3 cm in the
100
short-term experiments and 10.0 cm × 3.6 cm × 0.4 cm in the long-term experiment. Electrodes
101
were submerged at a depth of either 3.8 cm (short-term experiments) or 2.8 cm (long-term
102
experiment) in the electrolyte, resulting in a geometric surface area submerged per electrode of
103
12.5 and 23.5 cm2, respectively. Both electrodes were galvanostatically controlled using a
5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
104
Wenking potentiostat/galvanostat (KP07, Bank Elektronik, Germany). A data acquisition unit
105
(Agilent Technologies, USA) was used to record electrode potentials every 2 minutes. Two
106
Ag/AgCl reference electrodes (CH Instrument, Inc., USA) were equipped near anode and
107
cathode surfaces (1 M KCl, assumed at + 0.235 V vs. SHE). Cell voltage, anode and cathode
108
potentials were recorded throughout the duration of the experiments. All electrode potentials
109
reported were adjusted versus SHE. The applied current density was calculated with respect to
110
the geometric surface area of the corresponding electrode submerged in the electrolyte. All
111
experiments were operated at a fixed current density of 8 mA/cm2.
112 113
Experimental procedures
114
Calculation of electron input
115
The theoretical electron input for the formation of MNP in this study was calculated according to
116
Dubrawski et al.24, which experimentally confirmed Fe2+ ions were firstly dissolved in water by
117
electro-oxidation of iron anode and underwent further oxidation reaction with oxygen ( i.e.
118
original oxygen content in water and atmospheric oxygen influx) to form to Fe3+ ions,
119
immediately forming pure MNP from Fe3+. The oxidation state of Fe used in this study for
120
electrochemical MNP production was therefore +2 (assuming electron inputs are 100% used for
121
oxidation of iron to Fe2+) rather than the average value of 2.67 in Fe2+(Fe3+)2O4.19
122 123
Short-term batch experiments
124
Two sets of batch-mode experiments were conducted aiming to produce MNP solutions at a
125
concentration of 10 g Fe/L for characterization and chemical analysis of MNP as well as for
126
sulfide removal tests. In the first set of experiments (n=4), 200 mL electrolyte was used with a
6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 24
Page 7 of 24
Environmental Science & Technology
127
total applied current of 100 mA for 19.2 h. The pH values and dissolved oxygen (DO)
128
concentrations were recorded throughout the course of the experiments. At the end of
129
experiment, the electrochemical cell was stopped and both electrodes were rinsed with 1M
130
hydrochloric acid (HCl) solution to dissolve the residual samples on the electrode surfaces.
131
Subsequently, the electrolyte was acidified using 1M HCl solution to pH < 1 and analyzed to
132
determine the total Fe concentration. The Coulombic Efficiency (CE) for iron oxidation was
133
determined using total Fe concentration measured. The CE for iron oxidation was calculated
134
according to Panizza et al.25 (see supporting information).
135
In the second set of experiments (n=6), 250 mL electrolyte was used with a total applied
136
current of 100 mA for 24 h. The pH of the electrolyte was measured at t = 0 h and 24 h. At the
137
end of experiment, the electrochemical cell was stopped and 10 mL sample was taken to
138
determine the MNP strength in terms of total Fe concentration. The produced MNP solution was
139
immediately used for sulfide removal tests (a detailed description of the experimental protocol
140
can be found in the section sulfide removal tests). A 100 mL sample was collected and analysed
141
for structural characterisation of generated iron oxide solution using X-ray diffraction (XRD). A
142
2 mL sample was collected and analyzed using scanning electron microscope (SEM) to
143
determine the morphology of generated iron oxide solution. Another 2 mL sample was collected
144
for the measurements of the particle size.
145 146
Long-term continuous experiment
147
The continuous experiment was carried out to determine the long-term cell performance in terms
148
of CE for MNP generation (i.e. iron oxidation) as well as the energy consumption of the system.
149
200 mL electrolyte was used with fresh electrolyte continuously added to the electrochemical
7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
150
cell at a flow rate of 0.96 L/day using a peristaltic pump (Watson-Marlow), resulting in a
151
hydraulic retention time of 5 h. A total applied current of 188 mA was used to produce MNP at a
152
concentration of 4.90 g Fe/L. Polarity switching of the electrodes was performed every 3.5 days
153
in order to equally dissolve both electrodes. To compare the long-term synthesized MNP with
154
short-term synthesized MNP, a 180 mL sample was collected on day 31 for XRD analysis and
155
particle size measurement. SEM measurements using 2 mL sample were performed on day 9, 14,
156
19, 22, 24, 28 and 31. Both total Fe concentrations and pH values of samples were determined on
157
day 9, 14, 19, 22, 24, 28 and 31. Three sets of sulfide removal tests using the produced MNP
158
solution were carried out on day 22, 24 and 28 (see section Sulfide removal tests).
159 160
Sulfide removal tests
161
Fresh sewage was collected from a local pumping station in Brisbane on a weekly basis and
162
immediately stored at 4 °C. The typical domestic sewage contained 10 to 25 mg/L sulfate-S, < 3
163
mg/L dissolved sulfide-S and negligible amount of sulfite and thiosulfate. The DO concentration
164
in sewage was negligible and the average pH of the sewage was 7.36±0.11. Three 2 L Schott
165
bottles were modified to be airtight, to prevent sulfide oxidation by oxygen from the atmosphere.
166
Prior to sulfide removal tests, a volume of 1990 mL sewage was heated up to 20±1 °C using a
167
water bath. Subsequently, the sewage was flushed with nitrogen gas for 15 minutes to ensure
168
there was no residual oxygen in either sewage or the headspace of the reactor. 10 mL sulfide
169
stock solution (3 g S/L) prepared by dissolving Na2S.9H2O (Sigma-Aldrich) in nitrogen flushed
170
Milli-Q water was added to the sewage to obtain a desired sulfide concentration of
171
approximately 15 mg S/L in sewage. As the sewage pH increased to > 8 after the addition of
172
sulfide, a diluted HCl solution was used to lower the sewage pH to 7.2, which is more
8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 24
Page 9 of 24
Environmental Science & Technology
173
representative of sewage pH. Different amounts of the produced MNP solution added for each
174
sulfide removal test are given in Table S1 of the supporting information. Each sulfide removal
175
test was done in triplicate with an experimental duration of 6 h. To confirm sulfide is neither
176
emitted to the atmosphere nor removed by sulfide oxidation, a control experiment without the
177
addition of MNP was performed using the same experimental set-up and protocol. Sewage
178
samples were taken before MNP addition at t = 0 min (at sewage pH of ~ 7.2) and after MNP
179
addition at t= 3, 15, 30, 60, 90, 180 and 360 mins for the determination of dissolved sulfide
180
concentration. Total metal concentration and pH value of the sewage samples were determined at
181
t = 0 and 360 mins.
182 183
Methods of chemical analysis and characteristics
184
Total Fe concentration was measured using UV–Visible spectrophotometer (Varian Cary 50 Bio
185
UV–Visible spectrophotometer) according to Liu et al.26 Total metal concentration (including
186
total Fe) was measured using inductively coupled plasma (ICP) (ICP−OES Optima 7300DV).
187
Dissolved sulfide and chloride concentrations were measured using Ion Chromatography (IC)
188
equipped with a Dionex 2010i system according to Keller-Lehmann et al.27 XRD patterns was
189
detected using a X-ray diffractometer (Bruker D8). Prior to XRD analysis, sample was dried in a
190
stream of nitrogen at room temperature. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were
191
analysed using a field emission gun SEM (JEOL JSM-7001F). Before SEM imaging, samples
192
were deposited on aluminium foil and dried overnight in a vacuum cabinet. Particle size was
193
measured using dynamic light scattering (Zetasizer Nano ZS, Malvern Instruments). DO
194
concentrations and pH values were measured using an on-line DO sensor (Mettler Toledo,
195
Switzerland) and pH sensor (Hanna Instrument, USA), respectively.
9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 10 of 24
196 197
Results
198
Characterisations of MNP
199
Figure 1 shows the results of characterisations of the produced black colloidal iron oxide
200
solutions. Samples were taken from the second set of short-term experiment and the long-term
201
experiment (day 31). Figure 1A shows the XRD patterns of the nitrogen dried iron oxide
202
powders which have 7 characteristic peaks at 2 Theta values of: 30.5◦, 35.9◦, 37.0◦, 43.5◦, 53.6◦,
203
57.3◦ and 63.1◦, matching the standard XRD patterns of Fe3O4. Therefore, both iron oxide
204
solutions were identified as Fe3O4 by X-ray diffraction. For both types of samples presented in
205
Figure 1A, diffractograms show traces of maghemite (Fe2O3) potentially resulted from the brief
206
exposure to air and magnesioferrite, due to the present of Mg2+ in the tap water. Results of
207
particle size distribution confirmed that MNP with a uniform particle size range between 120 and
208
160 nm were generated in both short-term and long-term experiments (Figure 1B). In addition,
209
the SEM images of short-term and long-term synthesized MNP are shown in Figure 1C and 1D
210
(day 31), respectively, confirming that plate-like Fe3O4 was electrochemically generated at
211
nanoscale (also see Figure S2 of the supporting information for an enlarged SEM image of
212
hexagonal plate-like MNP). Other SEM images of long-term synthesized MNP on day 9, 14, 19,
213
22, 24, 28 showed no obvious difference in the shape of MNP (data not shown).
214 215
Short-term MNP production
216
Four 19.2 h short-term experiments were conducted. Typical profiles of anode and cathode
217
potentials and the cell voltage are shown in Figure S3 of the supporting information. The average
218
anode potential and cell voltage were -0.16±0.05 V versus SHE and 1.84±0.12 V, respectively.
10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11 of 24
Environmental Science & Technology
219
Giving this low anode potential observed, several electrochemical reactions including oxidation
220
of water to oxygen (E0= +1.23 V), oxidation of chloride to chlorine (E0= +1.36 V) and oxidation
221
of Fe2+ to Fe3+ (E0= +0.77 V) were therefore excluded. Changes in pH values and DO
222
concentrations in the electrolyte over the course of the experiment can be found in Figure S4of
223
the supporting information. An overall increase in pH value of the electrolyte from 8.05±0.02 to
224
9.70±0.31 was observed. The DO concentration in the electrolyte decreased from 9.18±0.34 to 0
225
mg/L within 15 minutes and remained 0 mg/L throughout the experiment, which indicated MNP
226
were electrochemically generated as a primary product (formation within seconds) as described
227
by Dubrawski et al.24 The average total Fe concentration was determined as 9.35±0.28 g Fe/L
228
using UV/Vis spectroscopy and further confirmed by ICP results (9.98±0.43 g Fe/L) as well as
229
the weight loss of anode electrode (2.05±0.01 g Fe in 200 mL electrolyte). Taking the total Fe
230
concentration into account, the CE for iron oxidation was 93.5±2.8%.
231 232
MNP for sulfide control
233
The results of sulfide removal using batch mode produced MNP are presented in Figure 2. For a
234
theoretical MNP dosage of 26.1 mg Fe/L, the measured dissolved sulfide concentration in
235
sewage before the addition of MNP was 12.0±0.3 mg S/L. After MNP addition, the dissolved
236
sulfide concentration rapidly decreased to 4.5±0.1 mg S/L within 30 minutes and then slowly
237
decreased to 2.8±0.3 mg S/L within 6 hours. This decrease in dissolved sulfide concentration
238
was solely due to the addition of MNP, confirmed by the control experiment (Figure S5).
239
Overall, 76.4±2.7 % of dissolved sulfide initially present was removed. The initial (t = 0 min)
240
and end (t = 360 mins) pH values of sewage were 7.15±0.00 and 7.21±0.10, respectively. ICP
241
results showed the dosage of MNP was 25.7±2.1 mg Fe/L, in agreement with the measured Fe
11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 12 of 24
242
content of the dosed MNP solution and the dosed amount. This gave a sulfide-to-MNP ratio of
243
0.47 g S/g Fe3O4-Fe. The sulfide removal capacity of the MNP was 357.3 mg S/g Fe3O4-Fe.
244
Hence, the minimum MNP dosage required for the removal of 15 mg S/L in sewage was 42.0 mg
245
Fe/L (0.36 g S/g Fe3O4-Fe).
246
In the second set of batch tests, MNP dosage of 52.3 mg Fe/L was chosen to ensure the
247
dosage was higher than the minimum dosage of 42.0 mg Fe/L for the removal of 15 mg S/L in
248
sewage. After the addition of MNP, the dissolved sulfide concentration rapidly decreased from
249
12.7±0.3 to 1.5±0.3 mg S/L within 15 mins and then slowly decreased to 0.4±0.1 mg S/L within
250
1 h. A dissolved sulfide concentration of 0.2±0.0 mg S/L was observed at 1.5 h after MNP
251
addition, equalled to sulfide removal of 98.4±0.4 %. The initial (t = 0 min) and end (t = 360
252
mins) pH values of sewage were 7.15±0.00 and 7.52±0.01, respectively. The dosage of MNP
253
was later confirmed to be 48.8±1.5 mg Fe/L (0.26 g S/g Fe3O4-Fe) using ICP analyses. In
254
addition, ICP results confirmed that concentrations of other metals in sewage such as As, Cr, Cd,
255
Co, Ni, Pb, Se and Zn, etc. remained unchanged in sulfide removal tests (data not shown).
256 257
Long-term MNP production
258
A continuous electrochemical production of MNP was carried out for 31 days to determine the
259
long-term cell performance. The average total Fe concentration obtained was 4.53±0.35 g Fe/L,
260
resulting in a CE for iron oxidation of 92.4±7.2 %. The average pH value of the synthesized
261
MNP solution was 8.94±0.04. Figure S6 of the supporting information shows the profile of
262
anode and cathode potentials and cell voltage over the course of experiment. Overall, the anode
263
potential and cell voltage were stable throughout 31 days, with the corresponding values of -
264
0.23±0.19 V vs SHE and 3.74±0.23 V, respectively. Indeed, while performing polarity switching
12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 13 of 24
Environmental Science & Technology
265
or sampling of the MNP solution for determination of total Fe concentration and sulfide removal
266
tests, minor fluctuations in the cell voltage did occur.
267
The results of sulfide removal tests conducted on day 22, 24 and 28 are presented in
268
Figure 3. ICP results show the dosage of MNP for three tests was 42.5±0.3 mg Fe/L on day 22,
269
43.5±0.7 mg Fe/L on day 24 and 47.0±0.5 mg Fe/L on day 28, with the corresponding initial
270
sulfide level of 12.1±0.2, 12.4±0.3 and 13.0±0.6 mg S/L, respectively. The sulfide-to-MNP
271
dosing ratio was approximately 0.28 g S/g Fe3O4-Fe in all three cases. At 6 h after MNP
272
addition, sulfide concentrations were decreased to 0.2±0.1 (day 22), 0.1±0.0 (day 24) and
273
0.1±0.0 (day 28) mg S/L, equalled to sulfide removal of 98.3±0.4 %, 99.2±0.1 % and 99.4±0.1
274
%, respectively. Similar to the sulfide removal test using short-term produced MNP, the addition
275
of MNP to sewage increased the sewage pH from 7.15±0.00 to 7.56±0.07 (day 22), 7.50±0.04
276
(day 24) and 7.64±0.03 (day 28).
277 278
Discussion
279
Sulfide removal by MNP
280
The reaction between MNP and dissolved sulfide is a surface controlled process. The first step
281
involves chemical adsorption of hydrogen sulfide, generating new chemical bonds at the
282
adsorbent surface. Subsequently, the adsorbed sulfide can react with the MNP, during which
283
MNP is dissolved to form ferrous ions and sulfide oxidized to elemental sulfur.28 However,
284
under circumneutral pH and ambient temperatures, the second step is a slow process with a time
285
scale of days. As such, the oxidation process was likely negligible in our experiments. Similarly,
286
it may not be a major contributor to sulfide control in a real sewer due to the relatively short
287
transport time (hours rather than days).
13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 14 of 24
288 289
A new cost-effective method for sulfide control in sewage
290
In this study, plate-like MNP were successfully generated in water using an electrochemical
291
system, with a uniform particle size range between 120 and 160 nm. In the short-term
292
experiments, the average MNP concentration was 9.35±0.28 g Fe/L, resulting in a CE for iron
293
oxidation of 93.5±2.8 %. Sulfide was removed from 12.0±0.3 to 2.8±0.3 mg S/L within 6 hours
294
at a sulfide-to-MNP ratio of 0.47 g S/g Fe3O4-Fe, equalled to the sulfide removal capacity of
295
357.3 mg S/g Fe3O4-Fe. A complete removal of sulfide from 12.7±0.3 to 0.2±0.0 mg S/L was
296
observed at 1.5 h after MNP addition at dosage of 0.26 g S/g Fe3O4-Fe. In addition, a continuous
297
long-term MNP production with polarity switching was carried out for 31 days with a stable
298
average cell voltage of 3.74±0.23 V. The average MNP concentration obtained in the long-term
299
production was 4.53±0.35 g Fe/L, resulting in the CE for iron oxidation of 92.4±7.2 %. The
300
sulfide removal tests using long-term produced MNP on day 22, 24 and 28 also showed similar
301
decreases in sulfide concentrations from around 12 mg S/L to less than 0.2 mg S/L within 6
302
hours at MNP dosage of 0.28 g S/g Fe3O4-Fe. In general, the addition of produced MNP in
303
sewage achieved efficient sulfide removal (> 98%). A cost benefit analysis based on the results
304
shows the economic potential of this new method with an estimated cost of around $36.2/ML
305
sewage treated (see Table S2 of the supporting information), which is comparable to the
306
chemical costs for current sulfide control practice (i.e. addition of sodium hydroxide, magnesium
307
hydroxide, nitrate, iron salts and oxygen) ranging from 10.9 to 483.6 $/ML sewage treated.6
308
Here, the results of long-term experiment mimicking on-site operation as well as the outcome of
309
the cost benefit analysis clearly highlight the practical and economic feasibility of using MNP for
310
sulfide control in sewers.
14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 15 of 24
Environmental Science & Technology
311
Our results show that in-situ generation of MNP can be an interesting alternative to
312
conventional dosing of iron salts or other chemicals such as NaOH, eliminates the need for
313
transport, handling and storage of bulky chemical solutions. The addition of MNP for sulfide
314
control has several advantages over conventional iron salt dosing. First, the effectiveness of
315
sulfide precipitation with Fe2+ depends on sulfide concentration. To reduce sulfide concentration
316
to less than 0.2 mg S/L around the most prevalent circumneutral sewage pH levels, Firer et al.29
317
suggest that a Fe2+/S molar ratio of 1.3 and a Fe3+/S molar ratio of 0.9 to 1 should be applied
318
using programme predictions. However, it is difficult to get dissolved sulfide concentration to
319
very low level (i.e. less than 0.2 mg S/L) and as such excess iron salts are added to achieve
320
complete control.5 In practical situations, high Fe (Fe2+ or Fe3+) to S ratios are typically applied.
321
For example, Fe2+/S molar ratios ranging from 3.1 to 66.1 were reported.30 In this study, the
322
dosage of 0.28 g S/g Fe3O4-Fe is equal to a Fe3O4-Fe/S molar ratio of 2. The amount of Fe
323
required is well below the conventional iron salt dosing. Moreover, the magnetic property of
324
MNP may allow for the recovery of MNP at the inlet of the downstream wastewater treatment
325
plants. Second, the addition of MNP to sewage does not acidify sewage in contrast to the
326
conventional ferric salt dosing.31-33 Therefore, use of MNP for sulfide control could overcome
327
the drawbacks related to the decrease in sewage pH by ferric salts. These drawbacks include the
328
increase in the dosing requirements of iron salts29, as sulfide precipitation is less effective at
329
lower pH, and the release of more residual H2S to the sewer atmosphere in gravity sections.34
330
In comparison to unrefined magnetite powder, the results obtained in this study showed
331
remarkable improvements in terms of achievable sulfide concentrations (i.e. sewage between 0.1
332
and 0.2 mg S/L) as well as the sulfide removal capacity from 197.3 mg S/g Fe of purchased
333
magnetite powder to 357.3 mg S/g Fe of synthesized MNP. In addition, no increase in heavy
15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
334
metal concentration in sewage was observed in the sulfide removal tests, thereby the concern
335
about heavy metal content of unrefined magnetite was eliminated by using refined iron plates
336
(i.e. > 98 % Fe) to produce MNP for sulfide control in sewers.
Page 16 of 24
337 338
Design and operation of the electrochemical cell
339
Currently available studies report that MNP can be electrochemically generated in water with
340
particle sizes ranging from 10 to 100 nm at various current densities (i.e. 0.2 to 20 mA/cm2) and
341
inter-electrode gaps (i.e. 0.3 to 8.0 cm).20, 22-23 However, the maximum attainable concentration
342
of MNP reported was 0.71 g Fe3O4-Fe/L with the experimental duration of 15.7 min.20 Further
343
research is warranted to investigate whether the particle size can be further reduced by means of
344
either decreasing the current density or increasing the inter-electrode gap.22 Achieving high
345
concentration of 10 g Fe/L in this study reduces not only the hydraulic load to the sewer pipes
346
but also the size of the reactor, which could become crucial for practical implementation when
347
targeting large size sewer sections. Long-term pilot plant studies are recommended to verify the
348
performance of sulfide control as well as scaling up of the system.
349 350
Acknowledgements
351
Hui-Wen Lin thanks The University of Queensland for scholarship support. This work was
352
funded by the Australian Research Council, District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority,
353
ACTEW Corporation Limited, The City of Gold Coast, Queensland Urban Utilities, Yarra
354
Valley Water and Aquafin NV through ARC Linkage project LP120200238: “In-situ
355
electrochemical generation of caustic and oxygen from sewage for emission control in sewers”.
356
The authors acknowledge Dr. Beatrice Keller-Lehmann, Nathan Clayton and Ji Lu for their
16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 17 of 24
Environmental Science & Technology
357
helpful assistance with the chemical analyses. The authors acknowledge the support of the
358
AMMRF at the Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis at the University of Queensland.
359 360
Supporting Information Available: Detailed methodology, six figures and two tables. This
361
material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
362 363
Conflict of Interest Disclosure
364
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
365 366
References
367
(1)
368
corrosion through intergrated urban water management. Science 2014, 345 (6198), 812-814.
369
(2)
370
chemical process engineering of sewer networks; CRC press: 2013.
371
(3)
372
Corrosion of concrete sewers—The kinetics of hydrogen sulfide oxidation. Sci. Total Environ.
373
2008, 394 (1), 162-170.
374
(4)
375
on Hydrogen Sulfide Emission in Sewer Networks. J. Environ. Eng. 2005, 131 (12), 1676-1683.
376
(5)
377
Chemical and biological technologies for hydrogen sulfide emission control in sewer systems: A
378
review. Water Res. 2008, 42 (1–2), 1-12.
Pikaar, I.; Sharma, K. R.; Hu, S.; Gernjak, W.; Keller, J.; Yuan, Z. Reducing sewer
Hvitved-Jacobsen, T.; Vollertsen, J.; Nielsen, A. H. Sewer processes: microbial and
Vollertsen, J.; Nielsen, A. H.; Jensen, H. S.; Wium-Andersen, T.; Hvitved-Jacobsen, T.
Yongsiri, C.; Vollertsen, J.; Hvitved-Jacobsen, T. Influence of Wastewater Constituents
Zhang, L.; De Schryver, P.; De Gusseme, B.; De Muynck, W.; Boon, N.; Verstraete, W.
17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
379
(6)
380
Australia: An industry survey. Water Res. 2011, 45 (19), 6564-6574.
381
(7)
382
2002, 124 (28), 8204-8205.
383
(8)
384
nanoparticles. Prog. Cryst. Growth Charact. Mater. 2009, 55 (1), 22-45.
385
(9)
386
byproducts by synthetic goethite and magnetite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39 (21), 8525-
387
8532.
388
(10)
389
Mechanism of arsenic adsorption on magnetite nanoparticles from water: thermodynamic and
390
spectroscopic studies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49 (13), 7726-7734.
391
(11)
392
and bio-applications. Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2007, 32 (3-4), 203-215.
393
(12)
394
Decrease of dissolved sulfide in sewage by powdered natural magnetite and hematite. Sci. Total
395
Environ. 2016, 573, 1070-1078.
396
(13)
397
hydrothermal magnetite: A review. Ore Geol. Rev. 2014, 61, 1-32.
398
(14)
399
1991.
Page 18 of 24
Ganigue, R.; Gutierrez, O.; Rootsey, R.; Yuan, Z. Chemical dosing for sulfide control in
Sun, S.; Zeng, H. Size-controlled synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
Teja, A. S.; Koh, P.-Y. Synthesis, properties, and applications of magnetic iron oxide
Chun, C. L.; Hozalski, R. M.; Arnold, W. A. Degradation of drinking water disinfection
Liu, C.-H.; Chuang, Y.-H.; Chen, T.-Y.; Tian, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, M.-K.; Zhang, W.
Majewski, P.; Thierry, B. Functionalized magnetite nanoparticles—synthesis, properties,
Zhang, L.; Verstraete, W.; de Lourdes Mendoza, M.; Lu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Huang, G.; Cai, L.
Nadoll, P.; Angerer, T.; Mauk, J. L.; French, D.; Walshe, J. The chemistry of
USEPA Hydrogen Sulfide Corrosion in Wastewater Collection and Treatment Systems. ;
18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 19 of 24
Environmental Science & Technology
400
(15)
Yean, S.; Cong, L.; Yavuz, C.; Mayo, J.; Yu, W.; Kan, A.; Colvin, V.; Tomson, M. Effect
401
of magnetite particle size on adsorption and desorption of arsenite and arsenate. J. Mater. Res.
402
2005, 20 (12), 3255-3264.
403
(16)
404
aggregation effects on magnetite reactivity toward carbon tetrachloride. Environ. Sci. Technol.
405
2007, 41 (15), 5277-5283.
406
(17)
407
P.; Pourroy, G. Phosphate adsorption properties of magnetite-based nanoparticles. Chem. Mater.
408
2007, 19 (18), 4494-4505.
409
(18)
410
functionalization, and application. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46 (8), 1222-1244.
411
(19)
412
of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2014, 368, 207-229.
413
(20)
414
magnetic seeding of colloidal particles. Colloids Surf. Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 2001, 177 (2),
415
223-233.
416
(21)
417
Magnetite Particles. J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. 2002, 23 (4), 569-576.
418
(22)
419
nanoparticles by surfactant-free electrochemical method in an aqueous system. Adv. Powder
420
Technol. 2012, 23 (3), 328-333.
Vikesland, P. J.; Heathcock, A. M.; Rebodos, R. L.; Makus, K. E. Particle size and
Daou, T.; Begin-Colin, S.; Greneche, J.; Thomas, F.; Derory, A.; Bernhardt, P.; Legaré,
Lu, A. H.; Salabas, E. e. L.; Schüth, F. Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, protection,
Ramimoghadam, D.; Bagheri, S.; Hamid, S. B. A. Progress in electrochemical synthesis
Tsouris, C.; DePaoli, D.; Shor, J.; Hu, M.-C.; Ying, T.-Y. Electrocoagulation for
Ying, T.-Y.; Yiacoumi, S.; Tsouris, C. An Electrochemical Method for the Formation of
Fajaroh, F.; Setyawan, H.; Widiyastuti, W.; Winardi, S. Synthesis of magnetite
19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 20 of 24
421
(23)
Manrique-Julio, J.; Machuca-Martinez, F.; Marriaga-Cabrales, N.; Pinzon-Cardenas, M.
422
Production of magnetite by electrolytic reduction of ferric oxyhydroxide. J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
423
2016, 401, 81-85.
424
(24)
425
Mohseni, M. Production and transformation of mixed-valent nanoparticles generated by Fe (0)
426
electrocoagulation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49 (4), 2171-2179.
427
(25)
428
wastewater containing organic pollutants. In Electrochemistry for the Environment, Springer:
429
2010; pp 25-54.
430
(26)
431
removal by mixing with dispersed carbon cathodes. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 550, 95-102.
432
(27)
433
simultaneous analysis of relevant soluble sulfur species in sewage samples. In Sewer Operation
434
and Maintenance SOM 06, Vienna, Austria, 2006; Vol. 26, p 28.
435
(28)
436
(oxyhydr)oxide minerals towards dissolved sulfide. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 2004, 68
437
(18), 3703-3715.
438
(29)
439
salts: comparison between theoretical and experimental results, and practical implications. Sci.
440
Total Environ. 2008, 392 (1), 145-156.
441
(30)
442
sewers: tests on a laboratory-scale sewer system. J. Environ. Eng. 2010, 136 (10), 1180-1187.
Dubrawski, K. L.; van Genuchten, C. M.; Delaire, C.; Amrose, S. E.; Gadgil, A. J.;
Panizza, M., Importance of electrode material in the electrochemical treatment of
Liu, P.; Keller, J.; Gernjak, W. Enhancing zero valent iron based natural organic matter
Keller-Lehmann, B.; Corrie, S.; Ravn, R.; Yuan, Z.; Keller, J., Preservation and
Poulton, S. W.; Krom, M. D.; Raiswell, R., A revised scheme for the reactivity of iron
Firer, D.; Friedler, E.; Lahav, O. Control of sulfide in sewer systems by dosage of iron
Zhang, L.; Keller, J.; Yuan, Z. Ferrous salt demand for sulfide control in rising main
20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 21 of 24
Environmental Science & Technology
443
(31)
Brezonik, P. L.; Arnold, W. A. Water chemistry: an introduction to the chemistry of
444
natural and engineered aquatic systems; Oxford University Press: Oxford, New York, 2011.
445
(32)
446
occurrence and uses; VCH: Weinheim, New York, 1996.
447
(33)
448
domestic wastewater from a gravity sewer. Water Res. 2005, 39 (12), 2747-2755.
449
(34)
450
Environment Research Fundation: London, UK, 2007.
Cornell, R. M.; Schwertmann, U. The iron oxides: structure, properties, reactions,
Nielsen, A. H.; Lens, P.; Vollertsen, J.; Hvitved-Jacobsen, T. Sulfide–iron interactions in
WERF Minimization of Odors and Corrosion in collection systems phase 1; Water
21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 22 of 24
451 452
Figure 1. (A) XRD patterns and (B) the particle size distribution of MNP obtained by
453
electrochemical synthesis in both short-term and long-term experiments. SEM micrographs of
454
(C) short-term and (D) long-term synthesized MNP. Short-term sample was taken from the
455
second set of short-term experiment while the long-term sample was taken on day 31.
456
22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 23 of 24
Environmental Science & Technology
457 458
Figure 2. Decrease in dissolved sulfide with different MNP dosages over the course of 6 h.
459
23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 24 of 24
460 461
Figure 3. Decrease in dissolved sulfide with MNP dosage over the course of 6 hours.
462
Experiments were conducted on day 22, 24 and 28.
463
24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment