Encapsulating Mobile Proton Carriers into Structural Defects in

Subscriber access provided by University of Birmingham

Article

Encapsulating mobile proton carriers into structural defects in coordination polymer crystals: high anhydrous proton conduction and fuel cell application Munehiro Inukai, Satoshi Horike, Tomoya Itakura, Ryota Shinozaki, Naoki Ogiwara, Daiki Umeyama, Sanjog S. Nagarkar, Yusuke Nishiyama, Michal Malon, Akari Hayashi, Takashi Ohhara, Ryoji Kiyanagi, and Susumu Kitagawa J. Am. Chem. Soc., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b03625 • Publication Date (Web): 21 Jun 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on June 25, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of the American Chemical Society is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Encapsulating mobile proton carriers into structural defects in coordination polymer crystals: high anhydrous proton conduction and fuel cell application Munehiro Inukai,a,b Satoshi Horike,c* Tomoya Itakura,d Ryota Shinozaki,d Naoki Ogiwara,c Daiki Umeyama,c Sanjog Nagarkar,a Yusuke Nishiyama,e,f Michal Malon,e,f Akari Hayashi,g Takashi Ohhara,h,i Ryoji Kiyanagi,h Susumu Kitagawaa,c* a

Institute for Integrated Cell-Material Sciences (WPI-iCeMS), Kyoto University, Yoshida, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan b Graduate School of Science and Technology, Tokushima University, 2-1 Minami-Josanjima-Cho, Tokushima 770-8506, Japan c Department of Synthetic Chemistry and Biological Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Katsura, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto 615-8510, Japan d DENSO CORPORATION, 1-1, Showa-cho, Kariya, Aichi 448-8661, Japan e JEOL Resonance Inc., 3-1-2 Musashino, Akishima, Tokyo 196-8558, Japan f RIKEN CLST-JEOL Collaboration Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan g International Research Center for Hydrogen Energy, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan h J-PARC center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai, Naka-gun 319-1195, Japan i Research Center for Neutron Science and Technology, Comprehensive Research Organization for Science and Society, Tokai, Ibaraki 319-1106, Japan. KEYWORDS. coordination polymer, anhydrous proton conduction, fuel cell ABSTRACT: We describe the encapsulation of mobile proton carriers into defect sites in nonporous coordination polymers (CPs). The proton carriers were encapsulated with high mobility and provided high proton conductivity at 150 °C under anhydrous conditions. The high proton conductivity and nonporous nature of the CP allowed its application as an electrolyte in a fuel cell. The defects and mobile proton carriers were investigated using solid-state NMR, XAFS, XRD, and ICP-AES/EA. Based on these analyses, we concluded that the defect sites provide space for mobile uncoordinated H3PO4, H2PO4−, and H2O. These mobile carriers play a key role in expanding the proton-hopping path and promoting the mobility of protons in the coordination framework, leading to high proton conductivity and fuel cell power generation.

INTRODUCTION The design of fast proton conductive solids for use at high temperature (100–200 °C) is of interest to materials chemistry from the viewpoint of fuel cell technology.1 A powerful method to obtain high proton conductivity is to incorporate fast mobile proton carriers, which act as proton acceptor and donor sites, into proton conductive solids. For example, water in perfluorosulfonic acid polymers (e.g. Nafion), significantly promote proton conduction. However, such proton carriers migrate from the polymer chains at temperatures above 100 °C, resulting in low proton conduction or Pt catalyst poisoning in fuel cells.2 Therefore, the development of proton conductive solids that strongly encapsulate proton carriers with high mobility is a challenge that requires addressing.2c Porous coordination polymers (PCPs) and metal organic frameworks (MOFs) comprising metal ions and bridging ligands3 have received attention as solid-state proton conductors because of their regular and designable pore structures and

thermal stability.4 Mobile proton carriers such as water,5 amine,6 and acid molecules7 contained in the pores impart proton conductivity to PCPs and MOFs. Although many reported proton conductive PCPs and MOFs show high conductivity (above 10−3 S cm−1),7a,b, 8 there is no report on the application of these materials as solid electrolytes for fuel cell devices. This is because of the drawbacks inherent to these materials, including the leaching of proton carriers from the pores and the fuel crossover problems due to their inherent porosity.9 The former problem makes it difficult to maintain high proton conductivity of membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs), which are a key architecture for fuel cell, and the latter problem causes a reduction in the electromotive force of the fuel cell. In order to overcome these problems and to apply these metal-organic hybrid materials to fuel cell devices, we have focused on the defects in nonporous coordination polymers (CPs) and present a strategy to both strongly encapsulate proton carriers with high mobility and avoid fuel crossover. Introduction of defect has recently been developed for PCPs/MOFs

ACS Paragon Plus Environment


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

to modulate functions such as gas adsorption,10 catalytic activity,11 and proton conductivity;12 however, defects in nonporous CPs have been less studied. In this work, we propose a concept to make use of the defect sites in CPs crystal for doping of proton carriers. The trapped carriers are maintained in the structure up to its decomposition temperature (ca. 180 °C). Consequently, we observed fast anhydrous proton conduction and successfully performed first demonstration of power generation using a fuel cell with the CP as the electrolyte.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION We employed a two dimensional CP [Zn(H2PO4)2(C2N3H3)2]n (1),13 which shows proton conduction under anhydrous conditions at 150 °C. Our previous study showed that protons mainly transport between the monodentate H2PO4− ions. To enhance the conductivity by incorporating proton carriers, more detailed information regarding proton conduction, including the location of the protons and the hopping pathway, is required. We first prepared a large single crystal of 1 (1s, 2.0 ×

Page 2 of 8

2.0 × 0.4 mm3) and analyzed the location of protons by single crystal neutron diffraction measurement at 290 K. 1s is constructed from stacked two dimensional (2-D) sheets comprising Zn2+, 1,2,4-triazole (HTz), and H2PO4−, i.e., [Zn(H2PO4)2(C2N3H3)2]n (Figure 1a). Two hydrogen atoms are present on the monodentate H2PO4− and three hydrogen atoms are present on the bidentate HTz. Protons H10 and H14 are connected to the proton donor sites O8 and O6 and point to the proton acceptor oxygen O7 of the inter- and intra-layer H2PO4− ions. These distances are 1.01 Å (O8–H10), 1.55 Å (H10–O7), 1.01 Å (O6–H14), and 1.56 Å (H14–O7) (Figure 1b and 1c). These values are similar to those in other well-known proton conductors.14 The distance N7H11–O7 between the HTz moiety and H2PO4− is 2.52 Å. Recent DFT calculations indicated that the typical intermolecular NH–O distance capable of proton transport is ca. 1.3–1.7 Å.15 The HTz protons do not contribute to proton hopping in the 2-D coordination frameworks. Our previous study suggested the reorientation of H2PO4− using 2H solid-state NMR. H10 and H14 diffuse through 2-D proton transport pathways comprising rotative H2PO4− ions along the ab plane.

Figure 1. (a) Crystal structure of [Zn(H2PO4)2(C2N3H3)2]n (1s) along c axis at 290 K. H2PO4− groups are not shown to highlight the 2-D coordination framework. The hydrogen bonding (H-bonding) network of 1s viewed from the (b) a and (c) b axis. H-bonds between adjacent H2PO4− ions, and between H2PO4− ions and HTz molecules, are shown as green and blue dotted lines, respectively. [Color coding: purple: Zn, yellow: P, red: O, blue: N, black: C, and light pink: H.]

Synthesis of CPs with proton carriers embedded in the defects. Neutron diffraction analysis confirms that only monodentate H2PO4− plays a role in proton hopping. In general, the key strategies for enhancing conductivity are expanding the proton hopping pathway, increasing the concentration of protons, and improving the mobility of protons by doping with proton carriers.2f We addressed the introduction of defects to the monodentate H2PO4− network and the embedding of uncoordinated H3PO4, which has rotational and translational mobility. We reacted ZnO (2.0 mmol), HTz (4.0 mmol), and excess phosphoric acid solution in water by a liquid-assisted mechanochemical method. The amounts of the H3PO4 reacted were 4.0 (2, stoichiometric ratio), 4.4 (3), 4.8 (4), and 5.2 mmol (5). The solvent used for the assist was different from that used for 1 (ethanol) in our previous work13 used to introduce monodentate H2PO4− defects. We elucidated the ratio of elements using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) for Zn and P, and elemental analyses (EA) for C and N. The combination of ICP-AES and EA indicates a ratio of 1:1.6:4.1:5.8 (Zn:P:C:N) for 2 (Table 1). Compared to the ratio of defect free model, the ratio of P decreases from 2 to 1.6, whereas the ratios of C and N are similar to those of defect free model.

This indicates the defect of monodentate H2PO4− coordinated to Zn2+. In the case of 5, the ratio of P is close to that of defect free model, as are the ratios of C and N. This is due to the presence of uncoordinated H3PO4 in the defects of the monodentate H2PO4− framework (Figure 2). We also confirmed the ratio of Zn and P of single crystal sample (1s) using ICP-AES. The ICP-AES indicates a ratio of 1:2.1 (Zn:P) for 1s, suggesting few inherent defects of Zn2+ in the crystal. This result supports the defect of the powder compounds and the quantitative analysis of the defects. The results of X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS), and solid-state NMR measurement also support this model. Compound

Zn

P

C

N

Defect free model

1

2

4

6

2

1

1.6

4.1

5.8

5

1

1.8

4.0

5.6

Table 1. Elemental analyses using a combination of ICP-AES and EA. ICP-AES elucidated the ratios of Zn and P, and EA elucidated the ratios of C and N.


Page 3 of 8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


−

Figure 2. Proposed structural model of 5. OH is coordinated to − Zn instead of monodentate H2PO4 , whereas the uncoordinated − H3PO4 occupies the space where the monodentate H2PO4 existed.

To confirm the crystal structures, we performed powder XRD measurements. The patterns show no extra peaks attributed to ZnO and HTz. All peak positions are similar to those of the original material 1, indicating that its crystal structure is maintained (Figure 3a). However, the pattern of 2 shows a small additional peak at 10.5° (Figure 3b). This suggests that the part of the crystal structure around the defects changes slightly. In addition, the intensities of some peaks related to the coordination 2D sheets of [Zn–HTz]2+ gradually increase with increasing ratio of reacted H3PO4 (Figure S2). For example, the peak at 22.9° indicating the [004] plane gradually increases (Figure 3c). This would suggest improvement of crystallinity upon embedding H3PO4 into the defects. To confirm the thermal stability of the crystal structure, we performed variable temperature powder XRD measurements of compound 5. The XRD patterns in 30–150 °C did not change, suggesting that the crystal structure of 5 was intact up to 150 °C even though the structure has defective sites.

Figure 3. (a) XRD patterns: Calculated (light blue), 2 (black), 3 (red), 4 (blue), and 5 (green). (b) The XRD patterns in the range of 5–15° and (c) 21-25°. The calculation patter is omitted in (c).

To confirm the homogeneous distribution of H3PO4 in the particles, we performed scanning electron microscope-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscope on cross sections of particles of 5 (Figure S1). EDX element mappings for Zn and P show homogeneous distributions of the elements, confirming the homogeneous distribution of H3PO4 in the particle. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) profiles indicate thermal stability up to ca. 180 °C, which is similar to the decomposition temperature of the original 1 (Figure S5). The embedded H3PO4 is maintained in the 2-D coordination frameworks up to the decomposition temperature.

Proton conductivity. The proton conductivities were obtained by AC impedance measurement under dry N2 flow. Figure 4 shows Arrhenius plots for the proton conductivities of 2–5 from 30–150 °C under anhydrous conditions. The proton conductivities increase over the whole temperature range with increasing ratio of reacted H3PO4. Activation energies are 0.85, 0.57, 0.52, and 0.53 eV for 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Embedding H3PO4 significantly decreases the activation energy, while the effect is saturated in 4 and 5. At 30 °C, the conductivity of 5 is enhanced to 0.02 mS cm−1. The proton con-



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 4 of 8

ductivity of 5 reaches 4.6 mS cm−1 at 150 °C, which is ca. 10,000 times higher than that of 2. The conductivity is among the highest reported for proton conductors, including PCPs and MOFs4, acid-doped polymers,2f and solid acids,2b at intermediate temperatures (100–200 °C) under anhydrous conditions. We also obtained time dependence data for the conductivity at 150 °C to confirm the thermal stability of the conductivity. The observed conductivity is consistent for more than 900 min (Figure S6). This high stability is due to robust encapsulation of H3PO4 into the defects.

Figure 4. Arrhenius plot of conductivities of 2 (black circle), 3 (red circle), 4 (blue circle), and 5 (green circle) under dry N2 flow.

H2/O2 coordination polymer fuel cell. The obtained proton conductivity is close to acceptable values (≥ ca. 10 mS) for use as a fuel cell electrolyte.2b We prepared a H2/O2 fuel cell comprising 5 as an electrolyte, and measured the currentvoltage and current-power curve at 120 °C. The maximum open circuit voltage (OCV) is 0.88 V and is maintained for 1 h (Figure 5a), indicating little gas crossover and unfavorable chemical reactions. Compared to conventional porous crystalline solids, such as PCPs and MOFs, nonporous CPs are suitable materials for fuel cell electrolytes in terms of the gas crossover problem. Although the OCV value is slightly lower than the theoretical maximum of 1.16 V, it is comparable to that of conventional polymer electrolyte fuel cells.16, 1d The maximum power density is 2.8 mW cm−2. This is the first demonstration of power generation by a fuel cell with CPs/MOFs as the electrolyte. Compared to similar materials, the power density is higher than that of recently reported supramolecular metallogel proton conductors.17 Although the obtained power density is lower than that of well-known fuel cells, including oxoacid- and phosphoric acid-doped polymers,1d the power density could be improved by optimization of the electrode contact with the CP electrolyte, the thickness of the electrolyte, and the interface between the electrolyte and the electrode.

Figure 5. (a) Open circuit voltage in a H2/O2 fuel cell at 120 °C under anhydrous conditions. (b) Performance of H2/O2 fuel cell with 5 as the electrolyte at a relative humidity of 26% and 120 °C. Black and blue lines represent current-voltage and current-power, respectively.

Observation of the defects and the mobile proton carriers. The embedded H3PO4 in the coordination polymers improves proton conductivity and allows the material to be applied in fuel cells. To monitor the local coordination environment of Zn2+, we performed XAFS for 2 and 5. Figure 6 shows the radial distribution functions (RDFs) derived from extended X-ray absorption fin structure (EXAFS). In both patterns, a peak at 1.6 Å assigned to the first coordination sphere (Zn–O or Zn–N) appears.18 The shape of the RDF for 2 is almost coincident with that of 5. This indicates that no clear change in the first coordination structure is caused by excess phosphoric acid. XAFS analysis suggests that the Zn2+ first coordination sphere of 2 and 5 is Zn–O or Zn–N, whereas the combination of ICP-AES and EA indicates the defects in the monodentate H2PO4− framework in 2. Based on the synthetic scheme, XRD, XAFS, ICP-AES, and EA, we assume that OH− is coordinated to Zn2+ instead of H2PO4−. The above analyses fully support the proposed structural model (Figure 2).


Page 5 of 8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


Figure 6. RDFs from Zn K-edge EXAFS spectra of 2 (black) and 5 (green) at room temperature.

To confirm the structural model, we investigated the structural defects in the monodentate H2PO4− framework and the existence of uncoordinated H3PO4 using 31P solid-state magic angle spinning NMR with and without cross polarization between 1H and 31P (CP-MAS NMR and MAS NMR). The CPMAS NMR spectra reflect only the phosphorus of the framework and filter out NMR signals attributed to liquid-like highly mobile phosphorus. All the spectra show peaks at −3.2 and −5.7 ppm (Figure 7a). The existence of 2 peaks indicates that two types of monodentate H2PO4− exist in the framework; however, there is only one form of phosphorous present in the crystal structure, i.e., that attributed to monodentate H2PO4−. The 31P–31P double quantum/single quantum (DQ/SQ) correlation spectrum, as shown in Figure 7c, shows distance correlation peaks between the two different peaks, suggesting both forms of H2PO4− are located within 1 nm of each other, and are distributed homogenously in the crystal structure. Thus, the peak at −3.2 ppm may be assigned to the phosphorous of H2PO4− near the coordinated OH−. Thus, the two different peaks indicate the presence of defects in the monodentate H2PO4− framework.

Figure 7. (a) 31P CP-MAS NMR and (b) MAS NMR spectra for 2, 3, 4, and 5 at room temperature. (c) DQ/SQ spectrum of 2 at room temperature. The red line connects the two correlation peaks highlighted in yellow

The 31P MAS NMR spectra for 4 and 5 show an additional large peak at 0.0 ppm and a small peak at −11.4 ppm (Figure 7b). A recent 31P MAS NMR study revealed that the 31P NMR spectrum of polybenzimidazole doped with phosphoric acid shows peaks at 0.5 and −12 ppm assigned to doped H3PO4 and H2PO4−, respectively.19 This suggests that the peaks at 0.0 and −11.4 ppm can be assign to uncoordinated H3PO4 and H2PO4−, respectively. The two peaks only appear in the MAS-NMR spectra, which suggests that the coordination polymers contain both mobile uncoordinated H3PO4 and H2PO4−. The anionic uncoordinated H2PO4− acts as a mobile proton donor site, provides a new proton hopping path, and lowers the activation energy. For the charge compensation for the uncoordinated H2PO4−, a part of monodentate H2PO4− may change HPO42−. 2 exhibits additional peaks at 4.0 and 6.5 ppm. In a similar way to the XRD analysis, this indicates a slight change in the structure of the crystal around the defects in 2. Conversely, the intensities of the peaks at −3.2 and −5.7 ppm do not change,



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

which is similar to the spectra of the CP-MAS. This indicates that the monodentate H2PO4− and the structural defects in the framework are similar, even when H3PO4 is embedded into the crystal.

Proton dynamics. The dynamics of the protons directly affect the proton conductivity. To study the effect of mobile H3PO4 and H2PO4− on the dynamics of the protons, we performed ultra-fast MAS 1H solid-state NMR measurement for 2 and 5. Ultra-fast MAS provides high-resolution 1H NMR spectra of solid powder samples20 and is an established tool used to reveal local structures and proton dynamics.21 In the highresolution 1H NMR spectra (Figure 8a and 8b), 2 shows clear peaks at 8.0, 8.7, 11.0, and 12.3 ppm. For the assignment for these peaks, we carried out 1H–31P double cross polarization (double CP), 1H–14N hetero-nuclear multiple quantum Coherence (HMQC), and 2-D 1H-1H double quantum filter (2-D DQNMR) measurement (Figure S8 and S9). These spectra indicate that the peaks at 11.0 and 12.3 ppm are due to the two protons of monodentate H2PO4− and one proton of HTz (N-H). The other two peaks at 8.0 and 8.7 ppm are assigned to the remaining two protons of HTz (C-H). Peaks assigned to coordinated OH− may overlap around 11 ppm. In the spectra of 5, new peaks appear at 8.9 and 10.5 ppm.

Page 6 of 8

We also measured the 1H spin-lattice relaxation time (T1H) for 2 and 5 to discern whether the mobile species utilize all the protons in the H-bonds network. Table S1 shows the T1H values for 2 and 5. All the T1H values for 5 are smaller than those of 2. This indicates that the mobile H3PO4, H2PO4−, and H2O create a new proton hopping pathway, including the mobile carriers and HTz, and promote the mobility of all protons from the monodentate H2PO4− and HTz. This is the main reason for the enhancement of proton conductivity and decrease in activation energy.

CONCLUSIONS We presented a strategy to utilize defect sites in nonporous CP crystal to encapsulate proton carriers. The mobile proton carriers were maintained in the defects up to the decomposition temperature of the CPs and promoted the mobility of all protons in the CP, leading to stable high conductivity. In addition to the high conductivity, the nonporous nature provided a current–voltage curve without fuel crossover in the fuel cell. This is the first demonstration of power generation by a fuel cell in which CPs and MOFs were used as the electrolyte. To our knowledge, there have been very few reports of highly proton conductive crystalline solids that encapsulate mobile proton carriers into the structural defects of their crystal structures. Our strategy may be applied to other proton conductive crystalline solids, such as MOFs, metalphosphates, and oxoacids (e.g., CsHSO4). We believe that this work will contribute to the development of proton conductive solids and further the application of CPs and MOFs to fuel cells.

ASSOCIATED CONTENT Supporting Information. Experimental details, SEM-EDX images, TG profiles, time dependence of conductivity, solid-state NMR spectra, and T1H. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding Author *[email protected]; *[email protected].

Author Contributions The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Figure 8. 1H ultra-fast MAS NMR spectra for (a) 2 (black line) and (b) 5 (green line) at room temperature. 1H DQNMR spectra for (c) 2 (black line) and (d) 5 (green line) at room temperature.

For assignment, we performed 1H–1H double quantum NMR (DQNMR), which highlights low mobility or static protons.22 Figure 8c and 8d show the DQNMR spectra for 2 and 5 at room temperature. In the spectrum of 5, the additional peaks at 8.9 and 10.5 ppm in the MAS spectra of 5 disappear and the spectra shape becomes similar to those of the MAS and DQNMR spectra for 2. The 31P MAS studies indicate the presence of uncoordinated mobile H3PO4 and H2PO4−. Based on the 31P MAS NMR and 1H DQNMR, the additional peaks at 8.9 and 10.5 ppm are assigned to the protons of mobile uncoordinated H2O, and H3PO4 and H2PO4−, respectively.

This work was supported by the PRESTO and A-STEP of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on the Innovative Areas: “Fusion Materials”, Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (A), Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B), and Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. The neutron diffraction measurements were performed as general proposal of MLF/J-PARC (No. 2012B0259). We are grateful to Manoj Kumar Pandey and Jayasubba Reddy Yarava (RIKEN) for the solid-state 31P NMR measurements.

REFERENCES 1. (a) Li, Q.; He, R.; Jensen, J. O.; Bjerrum, N. J., Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 4896-4915. (b) Wang, Y.; Chen, K. S.; Mishler, J.; Cho, S. C.; Adroher, X. C., Applied Energy 2011, 88, 981-1007. (c) Zhang, H.; Shen, P. K., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2382-2394. (d) Chandan, A.; Hattenberger, M.; El-kharouf, A.; Du, S.; Dhir, A.; Self,


Page 7 of 8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


V.; Pollet, B. G.; Ingram, A.; Bujalski, W., J. Power Sources 2013, 231, 264-278. 2. (a) Alberti, G.; Casciola, M., Solid State Ionics 2001, 145, 3-16. (b) Hogarth, W. H. J.; Diniz da Costa, J. C.; Lu, G. Q., J. Power Sources 2005, 142, 223-237. (c) Asensio, J. A.; Sánchez, E. M.; Gómez-Romero, P., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 3210-3239. (d) Bose, S.; Kuila, T.; Nguyen, T. X. H.; Kim, N. H.; Lau, K.-t.; Lee, J. H., Prog. Polym. Sci. 2011, 36, 813-843. (e) Laberty-Robert, C.; Vallé, K.; Pereira, F.; Sanchez, C., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 961-1005. (f) Zhang, H.; Shen, P. K., Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 2780-2832. 3. (a) Yaghi, O. M.; O'Keeffe, M.; Ockwig, N. W.; Chae, H. K.; Eddaoudi, M.; Kim, J., Nature 2003, 423, 705-714. (b) Kitagawa, S.; Kitaura, R.; Noro, S.-i., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 23342375. (c) Ferey, G., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 191-214. 4. (a) Horike, S.; Umeyama, D.; Kitagawa, S., Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 2376-2384. (b) Yamada, T.; Otsubo, K.; Makiura, R.; Kitagawa, H., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 6655-6669. (c) Yoon, M.; Suh, K.; Natarajan, S.; Kim, K., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 2688-2700. (d) Ramaswamy, P.; Wong, N. E.; Shimizu, G. K. H., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5913-5932. 5. (a) Kitagawa, H.; Nagao, Y.; Fujishima, M.; Ikeda, R.; Kanda, S., Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2003, 6, 346-348. (b) Sahoo, S. C.; Kundu, T.; Banerjee, R., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 17950-17958. (c) Jeong, N. C.; Samanta, B.; Lee, C. Y.; Farha, O. K.; Hupp, J. T., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 51-54. (d) Taylor, J. M.; Dawson, K. W.; Shimizu, G. K. H., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1193-1196. 6. (a) Bureekaew, S.; Horike, S.; Higuchi, M.; Mizuno, M.; Kawamura, T.; Tanaka, D.; Yanai, N.; Kitagawa, S., Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 831-836. (b) Hurd, J. A.; Vaidhyanathan, R.; Thangadurai, V.; Ratcliffe, C. I.; Moudrakovski, I. L.; Shimizu, G. K. H., Nat. Chem. 2009, 1, 705-710. (c) Umeyama, D.; Horike, S.; Inukai, M.; Hijikata, Y.; Kitagawa, S., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 1170611709. 7. (a) Sadakiyo, M.; Yamada, T.; Kitagawa, H., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 9906-9907. (b) Ponomareva, V. G.; Kovalenko, K. A.; Chupakhin, A. P.; Dybtsev, D. N.; Shutova, E. S.; Fedin, V. P., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 15640-15643. 8. (a) Ohkoshi, S.-i.; Nakagawa, K.; Tomono, K.; Imoto, K.; Tsunobuchi, Y.; Tokoro, H., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 66206621. (b) Panda, T.; Kundu, T.; Banerjee, R., Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 5464-5466. (c) Umeyama, D.; Horike, S.; Inukai, M.; Kitagawa, S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 11345-50. (d) Bazaga-García, M.; Colodrero, R. M. P.; Papadaki, M.; Garczarek, P.; Zoń, J.; OliveraPastor, P.; Losilla, E. R.; León-Reina, L.; Aranda, M. A. G.; Choquesillo-Lazarte, D.; Demadis, K. D.; Cabeza, A., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 5731-5739. (e) Nagarkar, S. S.; Unni, S. M.; Sharma, A.; Kurungot, S.; Ghosh, S. K., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53,

2638-2642. (f) Nguyen, N. T. T.; Furukawa, H.; Gándara, F.; Trickett, C. A.; Jeong, H. M.; Cordova, K. E.; Yaghi, O. M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 15394-15397. (g) Phang, W. J.; Jo, H.; Lee, W. R.; Song, J. H.; Yoo, K.; Kim, B.; Hong, C. S., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 5142-5146. (h) Ramaswamy, P.; Wong, N. E.; Gelfand, B. S.; Shimizu, G. K. H., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 7640-7643. 9. Kitagawa, H., Nat. Chem. 2009, 1, 689-690. 10. Wu, H.; Chua, Y. S.; Krungleviciute, V.; Tyagi, M.; Chen, P.; Yildirim, T.; Zhou, W., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10525-32. 11. (a) Ravon, U.; Savonnet, M.; Aguado, S.; Domine, M. E.; Janneau, E.; Farrusseng, D., Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2010, 129, 319-329. (b) Park, T.-H.; Hickman, A. J.; Koh, K.; Martin, S.; WongFoy, A. G.; Sanford, M. S.; Matzger, A. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 20138-20141. (c) Vermoortele, F.; Ameloot, R.; Alaerts, L.; Matthessen, R.; Carlier, B.; Fernandez, E. V. R.; Gascon, J.; Kapteijn, F.; De Vos, D. E., J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 10313-10321. (d) Ameloot, R.; Vermoortele, F.; Hofkens, J.; De Schryver, F. C.; De Vos, D. E.; Roeffaers, M. B., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 401-5. 12. Taylor, J. M.; Dekura, S.; Ikeda, R.; Kitagawa, H., Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 2286-2289. 13. Umeyama, D.; Horike, S.; Inukai, M.; Itakura, T.; Kitagawa, S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 12780-5. 14. Kreuer, K.-D., Chem. Mater. 1996, 8, 610-641. 15. (a) Zhang, D.; Yan, L., J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 1223412241. (b) Yue, B.; Yan, L.; Han, S.; Xie, L., J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117, 7941-7949. 16. Verma, A.; Scott, K., J. Solid State Electrochem. 2010, 14, 213-219. 17. Aiyappa, H. B.; Saha, S.; Wadge, P.; Banerjee, R.; Kurungot, S., Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 603-607. 18. Umeyama, D.; Horike, S.; Inukai, M.; Itakura, T.; Kitagawa, S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 864-870. 19. Hughes, C. E.; Haufe, S.; Angerstein, B.; Kalim, R.; Mähr, U.; Reiche, A.; Baldus, M., J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 1362613631. 20. (a) Nishiyama, Y.; Endo, Y.; Nemoto, T.; Utsumi, H.; Yamauchi, K.; Hioka, K.; Asakura, T., J. Magn. Reson. 2011, 208, 44-48. (b) Brown, S. P., Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 2012, 41, 127. 21. (a) Lee, Y. J.; Bingöl, B.; Murakhtina, T.; Sebastiani, D.; Meyer, W. H.; Wegner, G.; Spiess, H. W., J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 9711-9721. (b) Graf, R., Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 2011, 40, 127-133. 22. (a) Goward, G. R.; Schuster, M. F. H.; Sebastiani, D.; Schnell, I.; Spiess, H. W., J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 9322-9334. (b) Benhabbour, S. R.; Chapman, R. P.; Scharfenberger, G.; Meyer, W. H.; Goward, G. R., Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 1605-1612.



Page 8 of 8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

8

Encapsulating Mobile Proton Carriers into Structural Defects in

Recommend Documents