Subscriber access provided by - Access paid by the | UCSB Libraries
Remediation and Control Technologies
Engineered and Environmental Controls of Microbial Denitrification in Established Bioretention Cells Lucas J Waller, Gregory K. Evanylo, Leigh-Anne Henry Krometis, Michael Strickland, Tess M Wynn-Thompson, and Brian D. Badgley Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b06704 • Publication Date (Web): 10 Apr 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on April 10, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 36
Environmental Science & Technology
1
Engineered and environmental controls of
2
microbial denitrification in established
3
bioretention cells
4
Lucas J. Waller1, Gregory K. Evanylo1, Leigh-Anne H. Krometis2, Michael S. Strickland3,
5
Tess Wynn-Thompson2, Brian D. Badgley1*
6 7
1
Department of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, 2Department of Biological
8
Systems Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg,
9
Virginia 24060, United States
10
3
11
United States
Department of Soil and Water Systems, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844,
12 13 14
Abstract Bioretention cells (BRCs) are effective tools for treating urban stormwater, but
15
nitrogen removal by these systems is highly variable. Improvements in nitrogen removal
16
are hampered by a lack of data directly quantifying the abundance or activity of
17
denitrifying microorganisms in BRCs and how they are controlled by original BRC
18
design characteristics. We analyzed denitrifiers in twenty-three BRCs of different
19
designs across three Mid-Atlantic states (MD, VA, and NC) by quantifying two bacterial
20
denitrification genes (nirK and nosZ) and potential enzymatic denitrification rates within
21
the soil medium. Overall, we found that BRC design factors, rather than local 1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 2 of 36
22
environmental variables, had the greatest effects on variation in denitrifier abundance
23
and activity. Specifically, denitrifying populations and denitrification potential increased
24
with organic carbon and inorganic nitrogen concentrations in the soil media and
25
decreased in BRCs planted with grass compared to other types of vegetation.
26
Furthermore, the top layers of BRCs consistently contained greater concentrations and
27
activity of denitrifying bacteria than bottom layers, despite longer periods of saturation
28
and the presence of permanently saturated zones designed to promote denitrification at
29
lower depths. These findings suggest that there is still considerable potential for design
30
improvements when constructing BRCs that could increase denitrification and mitigate
31
nitrogen export to receiving waters.
32 33 34
Introduction Bioretention cells (BRCs) are engineered soil systems designed to intercept and
35
treat stormwater runoff before it infiltrates underlying soil or is discharged to nearby
36
surface waters. BRCs successfully reduce many stormwater contaminants1-6 and are
37
rapidly becoming one of the most popular strategies used in urban stormwater
38
management. However, observed nitrogen (N) removal rates have been highly
39
variable,7-9 which is likely due to the many possible N transformations that occur in
40
these systems. Stormwater contains nitrogen in many forms, including particulate
41
organic nitrogen (PON), dissolved organic nitrogen (DON), and dissolved inorganic
42
forms such as ammonium (NH4+), nitrite (NO2-), and nitrate (NO3-).10-12 This diverse N
43
speciation contributes to a high degree of complexity in N cycling. For example,
44
negatively charged NOx ions (NO2- and NO3-) are highly mobile in soil and therefore
2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 3 of 36
Environmental Science & Technology
45
difficult to retain. In contrast, other forms such as PON can be physically captured by
46
the soil medium, but then undergo mineralization, ammonification, and nitrification
47
during aerobic conditions that can further contribute NOx species during subsequent
48
storms.9, 13
49
Denitrification is a microbial form of anaerobic respiration that is valuable for N
50
management because, when carried out to completion, it completely removes mobile
51
NOx forms from soil or water by transforming them into inert nitrogen gas (N2). However,
52
several underlying conditions must be present including: 1) the presence of denitrifying
53
organisms; 2) an organic carbon source as an electron donor; and 3) an oxygen
54
deficient environment coupled with oxidized N species to serve as alternate electron
55
acceptors.14 BRC design has evolved in attempt to facilitate bacterial denitrification,
56
most commonly by incorporating an internally saturated zone (ISZ) in the bottom layer
57
to promote a sustained anaerobic environment. While the incorporation of an ISZ into
58
BRCs can promote total nitrogen removal rates ranging from 60-80% in some studies,15-
59
17
60
significant difference in the reduction of N when comparing several BRCs with and
61
without ISZs.
others have shown only minor reductions in N removal,18 and Hunt et al.7 found no
Bioretention research has focused on design options that optimize vegetative
62 63
cover,12, 19, 20 soil medium composition,13, 21, 22 system capacity,23-25 and the addition of
64
carbon sources15, 17, 26 to increase N removal efficiency. For instance, multiple studies
65
have demonstrated enhanced N removal in BRC mesocosms containing vegetation,19,
66
27, 28
67
medium composition is more complicated because labile organic matter (OM) tends to
particularly with fast growing, high biomass plant species.12, 29 In contrast, soil
3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 4 of 36
68
leach N and phosphorus.7, 22 However, an organic carbon source for microbial activity is
69
also important, so the C:N ratio may be a critical factor to consider when selecting OM
70
additions.26 By contrast, fewer studies have examined the effects of environmental
71
factors on N removal in bioretention systems. In those studies, N removal rates have
72
been positively correlated with antecedent precipation,30 but effects of temperature can
73
vary by design. While conventionally drained BRCs generally export N as temperature
74
increases, BRCs containing a saturated zone show an inverse correlation between N
75
export and temperature.30-32
76
Despite the substantial amount of research focused on promoting nitrogen
77
removal in BRCs, important knowledge gaps remain. Firstly, there are few published
78
studies that evaluate broad patterns across numerous established BRCs. Second, while
79
denitrification has been studied in other stormwater systems,33-35 we are aware of only
80
two published studies that have quantified bacterial denitrifiers in a BRC.36, 37 Both
81
reported concentrations of denitrifying genes in a single BRC but the designs were
82
different, particularly considering the presence of an ISZ in the research by Willard et
83
al.37 Both also reported higher abundances of denitrifying genes in the surface media
84
layers compared to deeper layers, and hypothesized that saturation time and C content
85
influenced the microbial denitrification population.
86
In this study, we address both of these knowledge gaps – uncertainty about
87
denitrification controls in established systems and the lack of data that directly quantify
88
denitrifiers – by investigating generalizable relationships between BRC design factors
89
and microbial denitrification. Specific research questions were: 1) What are the most
90
important factors controlling the abundance and activity of denitrifying bacteria in
4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 36
Environmental Science & Technology
91
established BRCs and do they relate more to design or to environment? And, 2) among
92
the most important factors controlling denitrifiers in BRCs, how can those relationships
93
be leveraged for improved design? We conducted a comprehensive field-based survey
94
of twenty-three BRCs across the mid-Atlantic region that represent different design
95
specifications, climates, physiographic regions, and ages. From each BRC we analyzed
96
a variety of design aspects, soil and climate characteristics, and denitrification indicators
97
to identify the factors that correlated most strongly with denitrification capacity to inform
98
future improvements and management strategies.
99 100
Materials and Methods
101 102 103
Site Selection & Sampling Design specifications were originally acquired for approximately 50 BRCs in the
104
eastern mid-Atlantic region (Maryland, Virginia, & North Carolina) from a variety of
105
published articles, public databases, and personal communications. These were
106
narrowed down to twenty-three BRCs (Table S1 and Figure S1) that represent a range
107
of features related to design (e.g. presence of ISZ, vegetation type, media mix
108
composition, etc.) and also characteristics related to environment and locale (e.g. age,
109
geographic region, mean temperature, precipitation, etc.) that we hypothesized could
110
influence denitrifier abundance and activity (Table 1).
111
BRCs were sampled during a one-month period in Nov/Dec 2014 during dry
112
weather (i.e., following at least one week of no rainfall) to compare BRCs in a common
113
functional state. Soil samples were collected as cores extending to the full depth of the
5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 6 of 36
114
soil medium. Triplicate cores were collected from both the front (inlet) and the rear
115
(outlet) portions of each cell. To assess vertical stratification, the top 10 cm and bottom
116
10 cm of media from each core were separated aseptically. The three subsamples from
117
each location (i.e., top/inlet, bottom/inlet, top/outlet, bottom/outlet) were homogenized to
118
provide a total of four soil samples per cell (Figure S2). The samples were stored on ice
119
during transport to the laboratory and stored at -80° C for further analysis. A portion of
120
the sample was refrigerated at 4° C for < 7 d for analyzing denitrification potential.
121 122 123
Denitrifier Abundance and Activity For each soil medium sample, DNA was extracted using the PowerSoil DNA
124
Isolation-Kit (MOBIO Laboratories INC, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol.
125
Concentrations of extracted DNA were measured using the Qubit 2.0 fluorometer
126
(Invitrogen, USA) and stored at -20° C. Abundances of bacterial denitrifiers were
127
measured by quantifying the copy number of two key functional genes present in the
128
soil medium using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Target genes
129
included nirK,38 which codes for a nitrite reductase that converts nitrite (NO2-) to nitric
130
oxide (NO),39 and nosZ,40 which codes for a nitrous oxide reductase that converts
131
nitrous oxide (N2O) to inert dinitrogen gas (N2).41 These were chosen to represent two
132
key steps in the N removal process. Firstly, the conversion of NO2 to NO (nirK)
133
represents the beginning of the denitrification pathway where N typically becomes
134
unavailable to most organisms and will likely be removed from the system. Second, the
135
conversion of N2O to N2 (nosZ) is critical because it represents the final step where
136
nitrous oxide is converted to inert N2, thus preventing the production of a potent
6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 36
Environmental Science & Technology
137
greenhouse gas. Gene copies for each target were estimated by comparing cycle
138
threshold values to known standards of plasmids containing the target gene and
139
populations corresponding to each functional gene were computed as copies per gram
140
of soil medium. Standard curve R2 values for all genes were 99% or greater and
141
efficiencies were similar to or higher than previous studies ranging from 90.9 – 106.4%
142
for nirK 40, 42 and 83.9 – 96.5% for nosZ.43, 44 Reaction mixtures, primers, volumes, and
143
thermal profiles used for qPCR are included in Table S2.
144
While the number of denitrification gene copies indicates the abundance of
145
denitrifying bacteria, it does not quantify actual gene expression and/or cellular activity.
146
Denitrification potential, a direct measurement of denitrification enzyme activity, was
147
measured by the acetylene blockage technique.45 The protocol described by Drury et
148
al.46 was followed with the exception that headspace was flushed with N2. Briefly, soil
149
samples were incubated in an anoxic environment after adding glucose, nitrate, and
150
acetylene, and the amount of nitrous oxide was measured regularly over a 5 h period to
151
determine the rate of N2O production and estimate the rate at which denitrification could
152
potentially occur within a soil sample under optimal conditions. Gas samples were
153
stored less than two weeks and analyzed on a gas chromatograph (Shimadzu, Kyoto,
154
Japan). Due to instrument difficulties, estimates of denitrification potential are only
155
presented for 48 of the 86 total BRC media samples.
156 157 158 159
Total Organic Carbon, Ammonium, and Nitrite-Nitrate Total organic carbon (TOC) and N concentrations in the BRC medium were determined from potassium sulfate (K2SO4) extracts. Extractions consisted of the
7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 8 of 36
160
addition of BRC medium to 0.5M K2SO4 at a 1:7 ratio, agitation using a side-arm shaker
161
for four hours, and gravity filtration through a 2.5 micron, 15 cm diameter, cotton fiber
162
Whatman No. 42 filter (GE Healthcare, Germany). Extracts were frozen at -20 °C prior
163
to analysis. Total organic C was analyzed on an OI Model 1010 total organic carbon
164
analyzer using the standard method 5301c.47 NH4+-N and NOx-N concentrations were
165
determined using a Lachat QuikChem 8500 Flow Injection Analyzer following the
166
QuikChem Method 10-107-04-1-L and APHA Method 4500-NO3- I.47, 48 Given that
167
dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) was measured as multiple species, a principle
168
component analysis (PCA) was conducted on NH4+-N and NOx-N concentrations to
169
calculate a single response variable that would provide simpler representation of the
170
effect of soil media inorganic N. The PCA analysis explained 83% of the variation
171
between nitrite-nitrate and ammonium concentrations – the principle component values
172
were then used for further analysis.
173 174 175
Data Analysis Vegetation in the BRCs surveyed in this study was broadly classified into three
176
types: grassed, landscaped, and overgrown. Grassed BRCs (n=4) were planted with
177
sod, did not contain a mulch layer, and did not contain forb, shrub, or woody plant
178
growth. Landscaped BRCs (n=12) contained a combination of herbaceous plants,
179
shrubs, woody plant species, were typically mulched, and were well-maintained to
180
prevent volunteer species from overgrowing the planted vegetation. Overgrown BRCs
181
(n=7) had not been well maintained and, although they contained some of the original
182
planted species, were primarily dominated by dense volunteer vegetation. To
8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 36
Environmental Science & Technology
183
investigate the effect of the original composition of the soil medium, BRCs were divided
184
into two categories: mixes comprised of ≤ 50% sand (n=8) and those with ≥ 80% sand
185
(n=11). The original media mixes of the remaining four BRCs were unknown. It is
186
important to note that denitrification potential estimates were available from only one
187
BRC with a medium ≤ 50% sand, so only four samples from one BRC were available for
188
that comparison. Measurements of denitrifying gene abundances, however, were
189
available for all BRCs.
190
Linear regression models were used to investigate the relationship between
191
denitrification response variables and the design and environmental data collected on
192
BRCs. Multi-model inference using Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC), a model
193
selection approach, was used to identify which models were most important in
194
predicting the denitrifying response variables.49 Akaike’s Information Criterion
195
incorporates a likelihood function that is corrected for the number of variables included
196
in a particular model, which allows for the determination of variables that most influence
197
the observed data and prevent continual addition of an increasing number of variables
198
to a model. We used a corrected variation of the AIC (AICc), which is a second order
199
formula recommended for analyses when the number of parameters is not large in
200
comparison to the number of samples.49 The result is an AICc value, with lower values
201
identifying more probable models. This approach has become increasingly popular in
202
understanding ecological processes and dynamics among datasets from which specific
203
variables cannot be isolated,50-52 which is a common problem in field-based surveys.53
204
The final model selection results were then produced by averaging the top
205
models for the denitrification response variables. Top models included in the averaging
9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 10 of 36
206
were identified as having ∆AICc of < 10, with ∆AICc equaling the difference between the
207
AICc value for the model in question and AICc value of the best model for a given
208
response variable, as proposed by Burnham and Anderson.49 The reported values for
209
each factor represent a relative variable importance (RVI), which are calculated by
210
summing the AIC weights across the top models and range from 0 to 1. Variables with
211
RVI approaching one have a greater model weight or appear more often in the top
212
models or both.
213
To further reduce the risk of identifying spurious correlations that can result from
214
random data dredging, the model selection approach was used in a structured
215
hypothetical manner to evaluate the relative importance of design and environmental
216
variables. Variables that are environmentally influenced and those that are fixed at the
217
time of design and construction were initially separated and analyzed independently to
218
reduce complexity (Table 1). After identifying the top models for each category
219
(environmental and design), the predictor variables from only the top models in each
220
category were then combined and analyzed together. The most important variables
221
were determined by those with the greatest RVI value and variables that had an RVI of
222
> 80% of the top RVI value. The intent of this approach was to eliminate elements which
223
indicated a marginal effect on the predictor variable and ultimately determine if the most
224
influential variables were environmental in nature or could be manipulated by design.
225
Predictor variables were transformed using a log or square root transformation to
226
reduce non-normal distributions in the dataset. This provided a better representation of
227
the gradients within our data and allowed for the identification of fewer top models with
228
higher confidences. Following the model selection process, Wilcoxon non-parametric
10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11 of 36
Environmental Science & Technology
229
tests (P < 0.05) and continuous variable regression ANOVA (P < 0.05) were used to
230
identify significant differences and examine relationships between categorical and
231
continuous variables for each denitrification response variable. Model selection
232
analyses were carried out using the MuMIn package54 in R55 and statistical significance
233
tests were determined using JMP.56
234 235
Results and Discussion
236
Model Selection Results
237
The primary objective of this research was to identify which factors or
238
combination of factors most strongly correlated with denitrification in established BRCs
239
and to determine whether those factors can be manipulated in future BRC designs to
240
potentially increase nitrogen removal rates. Given that numerous potential predictor
241
variables were measured (Table 1), it is not possible to present relationships between
242
denitrifiers and all measured predictor variables. Therefore, we used the model
243
selection process to identify which factors were the best predictors of denitrification
244
gene abundance and denitrification potential as response variables. This initial analysis
245
allowed us to focus the remainder of the discussion on the factors with the most
246
potential for facilitating increased denitrification.
247
The results of the complete multi-model inference analysis of all possible
248
measured predictor variables (Table 1) identified soil inorganic N, vegetation type, soil
249
TOC, medium composition, soil medium depth, and sampling depth to be the most
250
important variables affecting denitrification in the surveyed BRCs (Table 2). While this
251
still encompasses several factors that could have an impact, it is important to note that,
11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 12 of 36
252
from a water quality management and engineering perspective, each of these variables
253
can be manipulated by BRC design. This is a key finding because it results from a
254
uniquely comprehensive examination of many established BRCs to show that original
255
design factors have lasting and dominant effects on BRC function compared to local
256
environmental variables.
257
While denitrification potential is representative of complete denitrification, the
258
denitrification genes quantified in this study represent different steps in the
259
denitrification pathway. It’s important to recognize that the denitrification response
260
variables correlated most strongly with different factors (Table 2), suggesting that
261
individual steps in the denitrification pathway are affected differently. For example,
262
inorganic N, sampling depth, and vegetation type significantly affect all of the measured
263
response variables, suggesting they have broad control over the complete denitrification
264
pathway. In contrast, TOC was a strong predictor of nirK abundance and denitrification
265
potential, but it did not correlate well with nosZ abundance, which seemed to respond
266
more strongly to total BRC depth and medium composition. This distinction is critical
267
because nosZ codes for the enzyme that converts nitrous oxide (a potent greenhouse
268
gas) to inert N2, suggesting that some design factors may affect two key impacts of
269
bioretention systems – dissolved nitrogen removal and greenhouse gas emission – in
270
different ways. In the following sections, we further describe each of these important
271
factors independently and discuss how they could potentially be used to improve BRC
272
design.
273 274
Vertical Stratification as a Denitrification Control
12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 13 of 36
Environmental Science & Technology
275
Overall, indicators of denitrification activity were significantly elevated in the
276
topmost 10 cm of BRCs with nirK abundance, nosZ abundance, and denitrification
277
potential rates respectively averaging 5.7, 3.6, and 23 times higher than in the
278
bottommost 10 cm (Figure 1). These results are similar to recent studies that also found
279
lower concentrations of denitrifying bacteria in the deeper layers of single BRCs,36, 37
280
suggesting that this is a widespread phenomenon. The current paradigm is that lower
281
layers of BRCs, particularly those with ISZs, facilitate greater denitrification because
282
they stay saturated (and thus anaerobic) for longer periods of time. However,
283
measurements of proportionally greater denitrification in the upper layers suggests that
284
large fractions of many BRCs may not be performing as designed.
285
We hypothesize that, over time, particulate organic matter carried in stormwater
286
runoff accumulates primarily in the surface layer of the medium. This results in limited
287
amounts of available N and C in the deeper layers, which restrict denitrifying
288
populations. In our samples, mean N and C concentrations were 5.0 and 2.9 times
289
higher, respectively, in the top 10 cm compared to the bottom 10 cm of soil medium and
290
only one of the 5 BRCs with an ISZ documented the addition of a carbon source to the
291
saturated zone. Furthermore, denitrification gene abundances and denitrification
292
potential were actually lower in the bottom 10 cm samples of BRCs that included an ISZ
293
(Figure S3) compared to conventionally drained designs, casting doubt on whether
294
ISZs, which are currently recommended in some states,57, 58 promote denitrification in
295
the lower layers as they are currently designed.
296 297
Higher abundances of denitrification genes and rates of denitrification activity in the surface layers, where aerobic conditions are expected to dominate, suggest that
13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 14 of 36
298
substantial amounts of denitrification may occur either in anaerobic microsites or during
299
very brief inundation periods following each storm event. Additionally, degradation of
300
plant matter and the accumulation of particulate OM in the upper layers of BRCs may
301
result in the persistence of denitrification “hot spots” within the system that could explain
302
the higher denitrification rates in the upper layers of BRCs, as has been seen in other
303
soil environments.59 Further research on how denitrifier abundance and activity are
304
affected by C, N, and oxygen at different time scales and in different soil
305
microenvironments will help determine how to best promote nitrogen removal
306
throughout the entire volume of the BRC. Particularly in these systems, due to common
307
size and volume constraints and the mobile nature of NOx species, exploiting the entire
308
vertical profile of BRCs must be a vital strategy for reducing the export of stormwater
309
nutrients.
310 311 312
Vegetation as a Denitrification Control Relative to other factors, vegetation type was a strong predictor of microbial
313
denitrification. Specifically, denitrifying populations and activity were significantly
314
decreased in grassed BRCs (Figure 2), where mean nirK abundance, nosZ abundance,
315
and denitrification potential were respectively 5.5, 2.5, and 27 times lower than in BRCs
316
that were categorized as landscaped or overgrown. An important caveat exists in our
317
data because many BRCs that were classified as grassed were also constructed with
318
media containing a high sand content. As a result, there is some confounding of these
319
two effects in this study, making it difficult to separate causation from correlation.
320
However, there are clear biological mechanism that could be responsible for such an
14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 15 of 36
Environmental Science & Technology
321
effect. First, grassed BRCs do not contain a mulch layer that could capture organic N.
322
Using BRC mesocosms containing a 2.5 cm mulch layer and shrub vegetation, Davis et
323
al.13 found that the majority (> 50%) of total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) removal occurred in
324
the top 20 cm of the soil medium, suggesting significant sorption potential in the mulch
325
layer and captured organic matter. In our data, ammonium (NH4-N) was 3.0 and 4.3
326
times higher while nitrite-nitrate (NO2-NO3-N) was 13.7 and 13.6 times higher in the soil
327
medium of landscaped and overgrown BRCs, respectively, than in grassed BRCs. Once
328
sorbed onto mulch and organic matter, mineralization of organic N can fuel
329
denitrification and potentially a greater abundance of denitrifiers in BRCs containing
330
herbaceous and woody vegetation types. However, given that our data represent only a
331
single point in time, additional work is required to understand the balance among the
332
amount of nitrogen available in the soil medium, denitrifier abundance, and the rate at
333
which N may be leached, denitrified, or otherwise lost from the system.
334
A second important aspect of grassed BRCs is the dense rooting systems that
335
may compete with bacteria for available N between saturation events. For example,
336
Passeport et al.31 found grassed BRCs could remove N as efficiently as BRCs
337
containing “traditional” vegetative cover (trees, shrubs, & mulch) and Payne et al.60
338
observed that > 97% of nitrate in BRC soil columns was plant assimilated. Considering
339
nitrification occurs in the shallow aerobic zones of BRCs, vegetation with high nutrient
340
accumulation potential and dense rooting systems in these shallow layers may capture
341
and reduce the export of nitrified products. Multiple studies have confirmed the ability of
342
high biomass plant species, particularly those with deep rooting structures, to assimilate
343
a significant portion of stormwater N in BRC mesocosms.61-63 This is a critical
15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 16 of 36
344
consideration especially if, as discussed in the previous section, BRCs are
345
underperforming with regard to microbial denitrification in deeper layers. In that case, in
346
addition to deep rooting plant species, engineering improvements that facilitate
347
denitrification from the deeper layers could be an important factor for maximizing N
348
removal in bioretention systems. It is also important to remember that plant assimilation
349
only works as a N removal mechanism when plant biomass is captured and removed,
350
so improved denitrification would be a significant advantage in BRCs that are not well
351
maintained. Overall, both plant and microbial processes can clearly be important for N
352
removal and increased ecological understanding of these systems is required to
353
facilitate complimentary mechanisms to achieve significant improvements in total
354
reductions.
355 356 357
Soil Nutrients as a Denitrification Control Extractable TOC concentrations in the BRC soil medium samples ranged from
358
below detection to 1.02 mg/g dry soil with a mean value of 0.16 mg/g dry soil. All
359
denitrification response variables had a statistically significant linear correlation with
360
total organic carbon (Figure 3). These findings are different than those of Chen et al.,36
361
who found significant effects of organic matter on a different nitrite reductase gene, nirS,
362
but not on nirK or nosZ gene abundances. Biologically, a relationship between TOC and
363
denitrifiers is expected considering that most are heterotrophs that utilize organic
364
carbon as an electron donor. Although our results indicate that increased organic matter
365
could facilitate more denitrifiers, from a water treatment perspective, the benefits of
366
increased denitrification could be negated if the added organic matter is also a source of
16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 17 of 36
Environmental Science & Technology
367
leachable carbon and nutrients.11 However, there is evidence that some organic carbon
368
sources can fuel the microbial community but not contribute to nutrient leaching. For
369
example, Peterson et al.26 had success with the addition of woodchips and found
370
optimal N removal rates in gravel bioretention soil columns using 5 mm woodchips at a
371
quantity of 4.5% of the soil medium by mass. Presumably, the high C:N ratio of
372
woodchips resulted in minimal N leaching and a slow decomposition rate that
373
continuously supplied the microbial community with organic carbon.
374
Denitrification potential and denitrifying gene abundances also all had significant
375
correlations with inorganic soil N (Figure 3). Extractable ammonium concentrations
376
ranged from below detection to 136 µg/g dry soil with a mean of 12.9 µg/g dry soil.
377
Extractable nitrite – nitrate (NO2--NO3-) concentrations ranged from below detection to
378
38.2 µg/g dry soil with a mean of 6.27 µg/g dry soil. This particular effect represents
379
something of a design paradox since stimulating denitrification by adding N would
380
clearly be counterproductive. However, the N cycle is biologically complex and the
381
amount of inorganic N available to denitrifiers is a function of not just total nitrogen in
382
the medium but also other factors, including how quickly N is mineralized from
383
stormwater inputs, decomposition rates of organic N in the soil medium, and turnover
384
from plant and microbial biomass. Furthermore, after mineralization, the mobility of N
385
species and their availability to denitrifiers is affected by whether they are subsequently
386
nitrified during aerobic conditions. Relating these complex dynamics to BRC design is
387
particularly challenging because stormwater N generally cannot be controlled, so
388
increasing N removal efficiency in these systems will most benefit from optimization of
17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 18 of 36
389
organic matter in the starting soil media, promoting beneficial microbial transformations,
390
and increasing vegetative uptake.
391
On average, denitrifying gene abundances and potential denitrification rates were
392
higher in the BRCs containing low sand media (i.e., higher starting amounts of organic
393
matter), where they respectively averaged 1.1, 2.9, and 1.5 times higher nirK, nosZ, and
394
denitrification potential than in BRCs with high sand contents (Figure 4). Due to the low
395
sample size available for denitrification potential within BRCs with low sand content, the
396
relationship between denitrification potential and media mix serve only as a preliminary
397
assessment and will benefit from future studies. Organic carbon and nitrite-nitrate
398
concentrations also had higher averages in the low sand media mixes, but these
399
differences were not statistically significant in our data set. While increasing nutrient
400
availability via organic matter in the media mix may have the ability to enhance the
401
denitrifying microbial community, there are practical limitations to this strategy. For
402
example, low sand mixes are prone to compaction and clogging,64 are typically more
403
expensive,65 and have been shown to leach DON and phosphorus.9, 22 Constructing
404
BRCs with high sand mixtures and supplementing with organic carbon sources of more
405
favorable C:N ratios or N forms, particularly in specific underperforming areas of the
406
BRC, may be the most feasible design options that facilitate infiltration and optimize N
407
removal through denitrification.
408 409
Denitrifying groups nosZ vs. nirK
410
Differences between abundances of nirK and nosZ genes are particularly
411
important because a lack of nosZ activity is an indicator of incomplete denitrification that
18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 19 of 36
Environmental Science & Technology
412
could result in the emission of nitrous oxide, a potent greenhouse gas.66 As
413
demonstrated by the RVI data based on the model selection analysis (Table 2), the
414
abundance of the nirK nitrite reductase gene was most affected by sample depth and
415
vegetation type. TOC and inorganic N were also included in the top models but by
416
comparison were less important. For nosZ abundance, however, inorganic N and
417
sample depth were the most important variables followed by total soil medium depth,
418
vegetation type, and medium composition, respectively. Interestingly, unlike nirK and
419
denitrification potential, the model selection results identified medium composition and
420
soil medium depth to be important factors affecting nosZ gene populations specifically.
421
Relative to each other, mean nirK and nosZ gene abundances were weakly
422
correlated (Figure 5A), but on a per sample basis, nirK abundances were over an order
423
of magnitude higher than nosZ (Figure 5B). To our knowledge, relationships between
424
nitrous oxide emissions and denitrifying gene abundances have not been studied in
425
BRCs. However, the nirK/nosZ gene ratio is positively correlated with nitrous oxide
426
emissions in other soil environments.67-69 Additionally, nosZ gene transcription can be
427
suppressed at low oxygen concentrations, while nirK expression generally exhibits a
428
higher oxygen tolerance.70, 71 Given that we found the highest denitrification activity in
429
the upper (i.e., frequently aerobic) layers of soil medium, these relationships suggest
430
incomplete denitrification is highly likely and that nitrous oxide is potentially being
431
emitted from many BRCs. And while N2O emissions in BRCs are estimated to be
432
equivalent to that of other urban landscape features,72, 73 future design
433
recommendations should seek to minimize nitrous oxide emissions. To address this
19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 20 of 36
434
topic, quantifying nitrous oxide flux, rather than simply quantifying N removal from these
435
systems, should be included when possible in future research and monitoring.
436 437 438
Implications for Future Design Nitrogen removal continues to be a challenging facet of bioretention
439
performance. This research suggests that denitrifying bacteria are largely influenced by
440
the design of BRCs rather than local environmental factors, and that nitrogen removal
441
efficiency can potentially be enhanced by simple design alterations. Specifically, these
442
alterations include constructing BRCs with media mixes that provide the microbial
443
community with non-leachable nutrients, creating synergic relationships between high
444
biomass vegetation and denitrifiers, and by encouraging denitrification in the lower
445
layers by supplementing with C sources. Further research on denitrification in BRCs is
446
needed to determine if these findings can be used reliably to reduce net N export from
447
these systems at a large scale.
448 449
Acknowledgments
450
The authors would like to thank the Science Museum of Virginia, Dr. Allen Davis, the
451
North Carolina Department of Transportation, and the Montgomery County, MD DEP for
452
supplying BRC design information that was critical to this research. The authors would
453
also like to thank the Virginia Tech Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science
454
for the funding that made this research possible.
455 456
Supporting Information
20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 21 of 36
Environmental Science & Technology
457
Supporting information is available for this manuscript which includes bioretention cell
458
locations and sources of design information, qPCR thermal profiles and reaction
459
mixtures, sampling map, sampling locations within bioretention cells, gene abundances
460
in bottom 10cm of BRCs with and without ISZs, number of BRCs classified within
461
categorical variables, and mean and range data for continuous variables collected on
462
BRCs. This information is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
463 464
Corresponding Author Contact
465 466 467 468 469 470
Address: RB1880 Suite 1129, Room 1121 Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 E-Mail:
[email protected] 471 472 473
21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518
Page 22 of 36
References (1) Li, H.; Davis, A. P., Water quality improvement through reductions of pollutant loads using bioretention. J. Environ. Eng. 2009, 135, (8), 567-576. (2) Sun, X.; Davis, A. P., Heavy metal fates in laboratory bioretention systems. Chemosphere 2007, 66, (9), 1601-1609. (3) Randall, M. T.; Bradford, A., Bioretention gardens for improved nutrient removal. Water Qual. Res. J. Can. 2013, 48, (4), 372-386. (4) DeBusk, K. M.; Wynn, T. M., Storm-water bioretention for runoff quality and quantity mitigation. J. Environ. Eng. 2011, 137, (9), 800-808. (5) DiBlasi, C. J.; Li, H.; Davis, A. P.; Ghosh, U., Removal and fate of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon pollutants in an urban stormwater bioretention facility. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, (2), 494-502. (6) Davis, A. P., Field performance of bioretention: Water quality. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2007, 24, (8), 1048-1064. (7) Hunt, W. F.; Jarrett, A. R.; Smith, J. T.; Sharkey, L. J., Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2006, 132, (6), 600-608. (8) Hsieh, C. H.; Davis, A. P., Evaluation and optimization of bioretention media for treatment of urban storm water runoff. J. Environ. Eng. 2005, 131, (11), 1521-1531. (9) Hatt, B. E.; Fletcher, T. D.; Deletic, A., Hydrologic and pollutant removal performance of stormwater biofiltration systems at the field scale. J. Hydrol. 2009, 365, (3-4), 310-321. (10) Taylor, G. D.; Fletcher, T. D.; Wong, T. H. F.; Breen, P. F.; Duncan, H. P., Nitrogen composition in urban runoff - implications for stormwater management. Water Res. 2005, 39, (10), 1982-1989. (11) Li, L.; Davis, A. P., Urban stormwater runoff nitrogen composition and fate in bioretention systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, (6), 3403-3410. (12) Read, J.; Wevill, T.; Fletcher, T.; Deletic, A., Variation among plant species in pollutant removal from stormwater in biofiltration systems. Water Res. 2008, 42, (4), 893-902. (13) Davis, A. P.; Shokouhian, M.; Sharma, H.; Minami, C., Water quality improvement through bioretention media: Nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Water Environ. Res. 2006, 78, (3), 284-293. (14) Philippot, L.; Hallin, S.; Schloter, M., Ecology of denitrifying prokaryotes in agricultural soil. Adv. Agron. 2007, 96, 249-305. (15) Kim, H.; Seagren, E. A.; Davis, A. P., Engineered bioretention for removal of nitrate from stormwater runoff. Water Environ. Res. 2003, 75, (4), 355-367. (16) Lucas, W. C.; Greenway, M., Hydraulic response and nitrogen retention in bioretention mesocosms with regulated outlets: part II--nitrogen retention. Water Environ. Res. 2011, 83, (8), 703-713. (17) Zinger, Y.; Fletcher, T. D.; Deletic, A.; Blecken, G. T.; Viklander, M. In Optimisation of the nitrogen retention capacity of stormwater biofiltration systems. Novatech 2007: 6th International Conference on Sustainable Techniques and Strategies in Urban Water Management, Lyon, France, June 25-28, 2007; Groupe de Recherche Rhone-Alpes sur les Infrastructures et l’Eau: Villeurbanne, France, 2007.
22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 23 of 36
519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563
Environmental Science & Technology
(18) Dietz, M. E.; Clausen, J. C., Saturation to improve pollutant retention in a rain garden. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, (4), 1335-1340. (19) Lucas, W. C.; Greenway, M., Nutrient retention in vegetated and nonvegetated bioretention mesocosms. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2008, 134, (5), 613-623. (20) Turk, R. P.; Kraus, H. T.; Hunt, W. F.; Carmen, N. B.; Bilderback, T. E., Nutrient sequestration by vegetation in bioretention cells receiving high nutrient loads. J. Environ. Eng. 2017, 143, (2), 06016009. (21) Liu, J.; Sample, D. J.; Owen, J. S.; Li, J.; Evanylo, G., Assessment of selected bioretention blends for nutrient retention using mesocosm experiments. J. Environ. Qual. 2014, 43, (5), 1754-1763. (22) Clark, S.; Pitt, R., Storm-water filter media pollutant retention under aerobic versus anaerobic conditions. J. Environ. Eng. 2009, 135, (5), 367-371. (23) Luell, S. K.; Hunt, W. F.; Winston, R. J., Evaluation of undersized bioretention stormwater control measures for treatment of highway bridge deck runoff. Water Sci. Technol. 2011, 64, (4), 974-979. (24) Jones, M. P. Effect of urban stormwater BMPs on runoff temperature in trout sensitive regions. Dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C., 2008. (25) Brown, R. A.; Hunt, W. F., Impacts of media depth on effluent water quality and hydrologic performance of undersized bioretention cells. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2011, 137, (3), 132-143. (26) Peterson, I. J.; Igielski, S.; Davis, A. P., Enhanced denitrification in bioretention using woodchips as an organic carbon source. J. Sust. Water in the Built Environ. 2015, 1, (4), 04015004. (27) Henderson, C.; Greenway, M.; Phillips, I., Removal of dissolved nitrogen, phosphorus and carbon from stormwater by biofiltration mesocosms. Water Sci. Technol. 2007, 55, (4), 183-191. (28) Barrett, M. E.; Limouzin, M.; Lawler, D. F., Effects of media and plant selection on biofiltration performance. J. Environ. Eng. 2013, 139, (4), 462-470. (29) Gautam, D. N.; Greenway, M., Nutrient accumulation in five plant species grown in bioretention systems dosed with wastewater. Australas. J. Env. Manage. 2014, 21, (4), 453-462. (30) Manka, B. N.; Hathaway, J. M.; Tirpak, R. A.; He, Q.; Hunt, W. F., Driving forces of effluent nutrient variability in field scale bioretention. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 94, 622-628. (31) Passeport, E.; Hunt, W. F.; Line, D. E.; Smith, R. A.; Brown, R. A., Field study of the ability of two grassed bioretention cells to reduce storm-water runoff pollution. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2009, 135, (4), 505-510. (32) Blecken, G. T.; Zinger, Y.; Deletic, A.; Fletcher, T. D.; Hedstrom, A.; Viklander, M., Laboratory study on stormwater biofiltration nutrient and sediment removal in cold temperatures. J. Hydrol. 2010, 394, (3-4), 507-514. (33) Morse, N. R.; McPhillips, L. E.; Shapleigh, J. P.; Walter, M. T., The Role of Denitrification in Stormwater Detention Basin Treatment of Nitrogen. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, (14), 7928-7935. (34) Baker, B. H.; Kroger, R.; Brooks, J. P.; Smith, R. K.; Czarnecki, J. M. P., Investigation of denitrifying microbial communities within an agricultural drainage system fitted with low-grade weirs. Water Res. 2015, 87, 193-201.
23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608
Page 24 of 36
(35) Bettez, N. D.; Groffman, P. M., Denitrification Potential in Stormwater Control Structures and Natural Riparian Zones in an Urban Landscape. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, (20), 10909-10917. (36) Chen, X.; Peltier, E.; Sturm, B. S.; Young, C. B., Nitrogen removal and nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria quantification in a stormwater bioretention system. Water Res. 2013, 47, (4), 1691-700. (37) Willard, L. L.; Wynn-Thompson, T.; Krometis, L. H.; Neher, T. P.; Badgley, B. D., Does it pay to be mature? Evaluation of bioretention cell performance seven years postconstruction. J. Environ. Eng. 2017, 143, (9), 04017041. (38) Henry, S.; Baudoin, E.; Lopez-Gutierrez, J. C.; Martin-Laurent, F.; Brauman, A.; Philippot, L., Quantification of denitrifying bacteria in soils by nirK gene targeted realtime PCR. J. Microbiol. Methods 2004, 59, (3), 327-335. (39) Braker, G.; Zhou, J. Z.; Wu, L. Y.; Devol, A. H.; Tiedje, J. M., Nitrite reductase genes (nirK and nirS) as functional markers to investigate diversity of denitrifying bacteria in Pacific northwest marine sediment communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, (5), 2096-2104. (40) Henry, S.; Bru, D.; Stres, B.; Hallet, S.; Philippot, L., Quantitative detection of the nosZ gene, encoding nitrous oxide reductase, and comparison of the abundances of 16S rRNA, narG, nirK, and nosZ genes in soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, (8), 5181-5189. (41) Canfield, D. E.; Glazer, A. N.; Falkowski, P. G., The evolution and future of Earth's nitrogen cycle. Science 2010, 330, (6001), 192-196. (42) Regan, K.; Kammann, C.; Hartung, K.; Lenhart, K.; Muller, C.; Philippot, L.; Kandeler, E.; Marhan, S., Can differences in microbial abundances help explain enhanced N2O emissions in a permanent grassland under elevated atmospheric CO2? Glob. Change Biol. 2011, 17, (10), 3176-3186. (43) Towe, S.; Albert, A.; Kleineidam, K.; Brankatschk, R.; Dumig, A.; Welzl, G.; Munch, J. C.; Zeyer, J.; Schloter, M., Abundance of microbes involved in nitrogen transformation in the rhizosphere of Leucanthemopsis alpina (L.) Heywood grown in soils from different sites of the Damma glacier forefield. Microb. Ecol. 2010, 60, (4), 762770. (44) Harter, J.; Krause, H. M.; Schuettler, S.; Ruser, R.; Fromme, M.; Scholten, T.; Kappler, A.; Behrens, S., Linking N2O emissions from biochar-amended soil to the structure and function of the N-cycling microbial community. ISME J. 2014, 8, (3), 660674. (45) Smith, M. S.; Tiedje, J. M., Phases of denitrification following oxygen depletion in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1979, 11, (3), 261-267. (46) Drury, C. F.; Myrold, D. D.; Beauchamp, E. G.; Reynolds, W. D., Denitrification Techniques for Soils. In Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, Second Edition; Carter, M. R.; Gregorich, E. G., Eds. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2007; pp 471-493. (47) Federation, W. E., Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. American Public Health Association (APHA): Washington, DC, 2005. (48) Lachat Instruments. Determiniation of Nitrate/Nitrite by Flow Injection Analysis. Low Flow Method. QuikChem Method 10-107-04-1-L. Lachat Instruments: Loveland, CO, 2007.
24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 25 of 36
609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653
Environmental Science & Technology
(49) Burnham, K. P.; Anderson, D. R., Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer Science & Business Media: 2003. (50) Symonds, M. R. E.; Moussalli, A., A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike's information criterion. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2011, 65, (1), 13-21. (51) Richards, S. A.; Whittingham, M. J.; Stephens, P. A., Model selection and model averaging in behavioural ecology: the utility of the IT-AIC framework. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2011, 65, (1), 77-89. (52) Johnson, J. B.; Omland, K. S., Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19, (2), 101-108. (53) Richards, S. A., Testing ecological theory using the information-theoretic approach: Examples and cautionary results. Ecology 2005, 86, (10), 2805-2814. (54) Bartoń, K. MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference, R package version 1.40.4; 2018. (55) R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing., R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2017. (56) JMP, Version 13; SAS Institute Inc: Cary, NC, 2007. (57) NCDENR. Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources: Raleigh, NC, 2007. (58) ARC. Georgia Stormwater Management Manual – Vol. 2: Technical Handbook. Atlanta Regional Commission: Atlanta, GA, 2016. (59) Parkin, T. B., Soil microsites as a source of denitrification variability. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1987, 51, (5), 1194-1199. (60) Payne, E. G.; Fletcher, T. D.; Russell, D. G.; Grace, M. R.; Cavagnaro, T. R.; Evrard, V.; Deletic, A.; Hatt, B. E.; Cook, P. L., Temporary storage or permanent removal? The division of nitrogen between biotic assimilation and denitrification in stormwater biofiltration systems. PLoS One 2014, 9, (3), e90890. (61) Cording, A. Evaluating stormwater pollutant removal mechanisms by bioretention in the context of climate change. Dissertation, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, 2016. (62) Glaister, B. J.; Fletcher, T. D.; Cook, P. L. M.; Hatt, B. E., Interactions between design, plant growth and the treatment performance of stormwater biofilters. Ecol. Eng. 2017, 105, 21-31. (63) Rycewicz-Borecki, M.; McLean, J. E.; Dupont, R. R., Nitrogen and phosphorus mass balance, retention and uptake in six plant species grown in stormwater bioretention microcosms. Ecol. Eng. 2017, 99, 409-416. (64) Hatt, B. E.; Fletcher, T. D.; Deletic, A., Hydraulic and pollutant removal performance of fine media stormwater filtration systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, (7), 2535-2541. (65) Davis, A. P.; Hunt, W. F.; Traver, R. G.; Clar, M., Bioretention technology: Overview of current practice and future needs. J. Environ. Eng. 2009, 135, (3), 109-117. (66) Zumft, W. G., The biological role of nitric oxide in bacteria. Arch. Microbiol. 1993, 160, (4), 253-264. (67) Philippot, L.; Andert, J.; Jones, C. M.; Bru, D.; Hallin, S., Importance of denitrifiers lacking the genes encoding the nitrous oxide reductase for N2O emissions from soil. Glob. Change Biol. 2011, 17, (3), 1497-1504.
25 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673
Page 26 of 36
(68) Li, S.; Song, L.; Jin, Y.; Liu, S.; Shen, Q.; Zou, J., Linking N2O emission from biochar-amended composting process to the abundance of denitrify (nirK and nosZ) bacteria community. AMB Express 2016, 6, (37), 1-9. (69) Li, S.; Song, L.; Gao, X.; Jin, Y.; Liu, S.; Shen, Q.; Zou, J., Microbial abundances predict methane and nitrous oxide fluxes from a windrow composting system. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 409. (70) Bergaust, L.; Shapleigh, J.; Frostegard, A.; Bakken, L., Transcription and activities of NOx reductases in Agrobacterium tumefaciens: the influence of nitrate, nitrite and oxygen availability. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 10, (11), 3070-81. (71) Dalsgaard, T.; Stewart, F. J.; Thamdrup, B.; De Brabandere, L.; Revsbech, N. P.; Ulloa, O.; Canfield, D. E.; DeLong, E. F., Oxygen at nanomolar levels reversibly suppresses process rates and gene expression in anammox and denitrification in the oxygen minimum zone off northern Chile. Mbio 2014, 5, (6), e01966-14. (72) McPhillips, L.; Goodale, C.; Walter, M. T., Nutrient leaching and greenhouse gas emissions in grassed detention and bioretention stormwater basins. J. Sust. Water in the Built Environ. 2018, 4, (1), 04017014. (73) Grover, S. P. P.; Cohan, A.; Sen Chan, H.; Livesley, S. J.; Beringer, J.; Daly, E., Occasional large emissions of nitrous oxide and methane observed in stormwater biofiltration systems. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 465, 64-71.
26 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 27 of 36
Environmental Science & Technology
674
Figure and Table Captions
675
Table 1. Designation of design and environmental factors used as predictor variables in
676
the model selection analyses to predict denitrifier abundance and activity (response
677
variables).
678 679
Table 2. Model averaging results for predicting nirK abundance, nosZ abundance, and
680
denitrification potential. RVI values are presented on a scale from 0 to 1. Variables with
681
higher values (i.e. closest to 1) are considered to have a greater effect on the response
682
variable. Cells that do not contain an RVI value indicates that the explanatory variable
683
was not included in the top models for the denitrification response variable.
684 685
Figure 1. Mean denitrifying gene abundances and denitrification potential in top 10 cm
686
vs. the bottom 10 cm of BRC soil media samples.
687 688
Figure 2. Mean values for nirK abundance, nosZ abundance, and denitrification
689
potential for all soil medium samples from BRCs with grassed (n=15), landscaped
690
(n=48), and overgrown (n=24) vegetation schemes.
691 692
Figure 3. Linear regressions for total organic carbon (TOC) and inorganic N
693
concentrations in the soil medium vs. nirK abundance, nosZ abundance, and
694
denitrification potential across all BRC medium samples. All regressions are statistically
695
significant (p < 0.05).
696
27 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
697
Figure 4. Mean values for nirK abundance, nosZ abundance, and denitrification
698
potential in all soil medium samples from BRCs with known media mixes containing ≤
699
50% sand (n=32) and ≥ 80% sand (n=40).
Page 28 of 36
700 701
Figure 5. Linear regression of nosZ vs nirK gene abundances in each sample. Panel A
702
represents correlation between the abundances of each gene and Panel B presents the
703
same data on equally scaled axes to compare relative abundance. The dotted line
704
represents a 1:1 ratio of nosZ to nirK that has been presented as an ‘ideal’ ratio to
705
prevent nitrous oxide emission.
28 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 29 of 36
706
Environmental Science & Technology
Table 1. Design Factors
Environmental Factors
Vegetation (Grassed vs. Landscaped vs. Overgrown)
Soil Medium Total Organic Carbon
BRC:Catchment Surface Area Ratio
Region (Piedmont vs. Coastal Plain)
Presence/Absence of Saturated Zone
BRC Age
Soil Medium Composition
Soil Medium pH
(≤ 50% sand vs. ≥ 80% sand) Soil Medium Depth
Mean Annual Temperature & Precipitation
Sample Depth (Top vs Bottom)
Soil Medium Ammonium & Nitrite-Nitrate
707
29 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
708
Page 30 of 36
Table 2.
DIN
Sampling Depth
Vegetation Type
TOC
nirK
0.46
0.96
0.78
0.64
Denitrification Potential
1.00
0.82
1.00
1.00
nosZ
1.00
1.00
0.91
Soil Medium Composition
Soil Medium Depth
0.85
0.97
709
30 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 31 of 36
710
Environmental Science & Technology
Figure 1.
711
31 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
712
Page 32 of 36
Figure 2.
713
32 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 33 of 36
714
Environmental Science & Technology
Figure 3.
715
33 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
716
Page 34 of 36
Figure 4.
717
34 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 35 of 36
718
Environmental Science & Technology
Figure 5.
719 720
35 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
TOC Art 84x47mm (225 x 225 DPI)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 36 of 36