Subscriber access provided by Karolinska Institutet, University Library
Fossil Fuels
Estimation of shale apparent permeability for multi-mechanistic multi-component gas production using rate transient analysis Erfan Mohagheghian, Hassan Hassanzadeh, and Zhangxin Chen Energy Fuels, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b04159 • Publication Date (Web): 01 Feb 2019 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on February 12, 2019
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
1
Estimation of shale apparent permeability for multi-mechanistic
2
multi-component gas production using rate transient analysis
3
Erfan Mohagheghian, Hassan Hassanzadeh*, Zhangxin Chen
4 5 6 7 8
Department of Chemical & Petroleum Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
9
Gas-producing shale and ultra-tight reservoirs are playing a key role in the energy industry and the
10
global gas market. Compositional simulation of gas production from shale media in the presence
11
of different mechanisms such as viscous flow, slip flow (Klinkenberg effect), Knudsen diffusion,
12
sorption, pore radius variation and real gas effect is a computational challenge. In this work, we
13
present a model that takes into account all the noted mechanisms of gas transport in shale media.
14
It is shown that the compositional effect of gas in shale media can be lumped into a single
15
component by introducing an apparent gas permeability, which can be estimated from the
16
conventional rate transient analysis. The main contribution of this study is a workflow
17
incorporating the relevant physics into a single term (apparent permeability) which will substitute
18
Darcy permeability. This procedure reduces the simulation runtime substantially and will find
19
applications in reservoir characterization and simulation of production from shale gas reservoirs.
20
Keywords: Shale gas; Apparent gas permeability; Sorption; Knudsen diffusion; Slip flow
Abstract
21 22
*
Corresponding author:
[email protected] 1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 2 of 30
23
1
Introduction
24
As production from conventional gas resources declines, unconventional shale and ultra-tight gas
25
reservoirs have attracted a great deal of attention, especially in the United States 1, 2. The promising
26
future of these reservoirs is caused by recent advances in horizontal drilling and hydraulic
27
fracturing technology 3. Different transport mechanisms involved in shale gas production make the
28
gas system unique and complex. A range of 1 to 200 nm for the pore size and permeability in the
29
order of nanoDarcys 4-6 invalidate the applications of Darcy’s law and the Navier-Stokes equations
30
7, 8.
31
Viscous flow of the compressed free gas provides a small portion of the production, whereas
32
adsorbed and dissolved gas in the kerogen are the two main contributors to the flow
33
Desorption, which is pronounced after pressure is declined below a critical sorption pressure, could
34
be the source of up to half of the total gas production 12. The mean free path of gas molecules is
35
almost in the same order of magnitude as the size of the pores, resulting in a high Knudsen number
36
flow 13. Thus, Knudsen diffusion is not negligible, especially at lower pressures and smaller pore
37
radii 4. The no-slip boundary condition is no longer valid 8; and pore enlargement due to pressure
38
depletion would also play a role in gas production. The above mechanisms in shale media lead to
39
gas production rates higher than the values predicted by continuum models.
40
Many attempts have been made to model the apparent gas permeability of shale reservoirs and
41
lump the effects of different transport mechanisms in one expression, which can substitute for
42
intrinsic (Darcy) permeability. Most of these models are either correlations, which are derived
43
empirically based on matrix permeability, or use ideal gas law in a set of capillary tubes
44
Civan used the single pipe model presented by Beskok and Karniadakis 17 and developed a simple
9-11.
5, 14-16.
2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 3 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
45
Hagen-Poiseuille type correlation including a second-order approximation for slip flow; however,
46
it involves using parameters such as rarefaction coefficient and specific grain surface which have
47
to be determined experimentally 15. Recently, simple analytical models have been presented, the
48
majority of which do not include all the contributing transport mechanisms. Apparent permeability
49
function (APF) and nonempirical apparent permeability (NAP) are well-known examples of this
50
category. APF includes the effects of slip flow and Knudsen diffusion, however, ignoring
51
desorption 2. NAP, which is derived based on the Navier-Stokes equations and contains no
52
empirical parameters, takes into account the effects of Knudsen diffusion and sorption, while
53
overlooking slip flow. Surface diffusion, pore surface roughness and mineralogy are deemed to
54
have negligible effects on shale gas production 11.
55
Molecular dynamics (MD) and lattice Boltzmann methods (LBM) are the most reliable approaches
56
to describe flow in shale reservoirs
57
restrictions on their use
58
been fairly successful in shale gas flow modeling although most of them are complex and/or ignore
59
one or more of the transport mechanisms
60
dimensional linear numerical model to study the effect of fluid flow processes (Knudsen diffusion,
61
viscous and slip flow) on the change in the composition of the produced gas. Different components
62
are produced at different rates depending on their physicochemical properties leading to
63
chromatographic separation in the shale porous medium. The effects of sorption and pore radius
64
change were, however, ignored 26. A brief tabulated survey of most well-known models can be
65
found elsewhere 21.
66
Conventional well test analysis methods are derived based on Darcy’s law, hence are not
67
appropriate means to accurately estimate shale gas reservoir parameters
21.
18-20;
however, high computational costs impose major
On the other hand, computationally cheaper numerical models have
22-25.
For example, Rezaveisi et al. developed a one-
27.
The mechanisms 3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 4 of 30
68
contributing to shale gas production cause the apparent permeability of shale reservoirs to be
69
higher than Darcy (liquid equivalent) permeability. Decline curve analysis and empirical
70
correlations are the classical tools of production data analysis 28. The decline equations have been
71
extended and type curves have been generated using dimensionless variables 29. Rate transient data
72
analysis is an efficient tool to reduce the uncertainty of gas production evaluation and is widely
73
used to estimate long-term production from shale gas reservoirs producing under constant wellbore
74
pressure
75
shale gas reservoirs, has been introduced to evaluate parameters such as permeability 30. Later on,
76
several authors tried to improve the accuracy of predictions by including and/or modifying pseudo
77
variables 31, 32.
78
As noted earlier, several mechanisms play role in gas transport through shale media. Developing
79
a comprehensive model, which can capture the effects of all the contributing mechanisms,
80
especially at field scale is a complicated task and the computational demand is high. The purpose
81
of this study is to develop a model which accounts for the role of all significant mechanisms
82
contributing to multi-component shale gas production. The numerical reservoir model presented
83
in the later sections includes the effect of viscous flow, slip flow (Klinkenberg effect), Knudsen
84
diffusion, sorption, pore radius change and real gas effect on shale gas production.
85
In the following, the model including the governing equations and boundary conditions as well as
86
reservoir input properties are described. The developed numerical model is then used to find an
87
apparent gas permeability based on the rate transient data analysis. The apparent permeability,
88
which theoretically lumps the effects of different transport mechanisms, reduces the computational
89
time substantially, while keeps the accuracy of predictions within an acceptable range compared
90
to the simulation results where all mechanisms are accounted for individually. The model actually
30.
The square-root-of-time plot for linear flow, which is the dominant flow regime in
4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
91
represents a shale matrix block producing multi-component gas from the adjacent fracture. In the
92
presence of experimental gas production data from shale core plugs, the model can be applied to
93
obtain gas apparent permeability, which can replace Darcy permeability and lump the effects of
94
all the involved mechanisms so as to expedite the simulation process. To the best of our knowledge,
95
such a model incorporating the simultaneous effects of all the above mechanisms on a multi-
96
component gas system has not been presented in literature.
97 98 99
2
Mathematical formulation 2.1 Model description
100
A few models have been proposed in literature to model multi-component gas flow in shale
101
reservoirs
102
account the effects of advection and diffusion, respectively. Permeability is corrected using one
103
single Klinkenberg parameter for the whole system and this fact reduces the flexibility of the
104
available models, especially at low pressures 35-37.
105
The dusty-gas model employs kinetic theory of gases to include ordinary and Knudsen diffusion
106
as well as advection for the flux of each component of the gas 38. Although the dusty-gas model
107
yields more robust results, the interaction between molecules leads to a coupled system of partial
108
differential equations, hence the problem becomes complex and the computational cost increases.
109
A comparison between the above two models can be found elsewhere 35.
110
The model used in this study is an extension of the model proposed by Rezaveisi et al.
111
modified to include the effect of sorption and pore radius change. To this aim, the non-revised
33, 34.
The advective-diffusive model employs Darcy’s law and Fick’s law to take into
26
and
5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 6 of 30
112
Langmuir adsorption model is employed to account for the adsorption capacity of different
113
components 39. The flux of each component Fi is modeled as follows:
Fi yi
Dkn ,i Pyi k D bi 1 P P RT Z
(1)
,
114
where yi is the mole fraction of component i, is the molar density of the gas mixture, k D is
115
Darcy permeability, is viscosity, bi is the Klinkenberg parameter for component i , Dkn ,i is
116
effective Knudsen diffusion coefficient of component i , P is pressure, R is the universal gas
117
constant, T is temperature and Z is gas compressibility factor.
118
As pressure declines during production, free gas is produced and the pressure difference created
119
between shale bulk matrix (kerogen) and porous space causes desorption of the gas 40. Langmuir
120
isotherm adsorption model has proved successful in fitting the experimental shale sorption data 12.
121
The non-revised Langmuir model is the most commonly used means to predict adsorption
122
capacities of different components of a gas mixture. The following equation models the adsorbed
123
moles of component i per unit volume of shale qa ,i
qa ,i
s P
sc
RT sc
VL ,i
39, 40:
(2)
Pyi PL ,i , Nc y j
1 P j 1
PL , j
124
where s is the shale density, P sc and T sc are standard pressure and temperature, respectively, VL ,i
125
is the Langmuir volume of single component i, which is the maximal volume of the gas component
126
adsorbed to the unit mass of shale, PL ,i is the Langmuir pressure or the pressure at which half of VL ,i
127
is reached and N c is the number of components. 6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
128
Energy & Fuels
The Klinkenberg parameter for component i is given by
bi
(3)
8 RT 2 1 , M i reff i
129
where M i is the molar mass of component i and reff is the effective pore radius, which is updated
130
versus changes of pressure and composition in the course of simulation. Parameter i is the
131
tangential momentum accommodation coefficient (TMAC) of component i. TMAC is the ratio of
132
diffusive to specular (mirror like) reflection of molecules from a surface and it depends on
133
physicochemical properties of the surface, the type of the gas, pressure and temperature. The
134
following correlation has been proposed by Agrawal and Prabhu
135
and is extended for a multi-component mixture to be used in our model.
i 1 log 1 Kni0.7 ,
41
based on experimental data
(4)
136
Kni is the Knudsen number of component i, which is defined as the ratio of the mean free path of
137
gas molecules to the characteristic length of the system (pore radius), and is modeled as given
138
below 5:
Kni
(5)
k BT , 2reff i2 P
139
where i is the molecular diameter of component i.
140
The following equation is utilized to account for the effect of pore enlargement caused by pressure
141
depletion 40:
7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
i
Nc
reff rav i 1
142
(6)
Pyi PL ,i Nc
yj
j 1
PL , j
1 P
Page 8 of 30
,
where rav is the average pore radius as given by Equation 7 42:
rav
8 k D
(7)
,
143
where and are the porosity and tortuosity of shale 43, respectively.
144
Dkn ,i (effective Knudsen diffusivity) is the modified molecular diffusion coefficient 5 to account
145
for the effects of porosity and tortuosity 35 as follows:
Dkn ,i
146
16 3
(8)
RTk D . M i
The properties of the base case linear reservoir model are presented in Table 1.
147 148
Table 1. Parameters used in the base case reservoir model Property
Value
Darcy permeability, k D nD
100
Porosity,
0.1
Length, L m Initial pressure psia Bottom hole pressure psia Temperature, T C Tortuosity, Mole fractions of C1, C2, C3, CO2 ( yi )
4 5000 1000 100 4 0.6, 0.25, 0.1, 0.05
149 150
2.2 Governing equations 8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
151
The temporal partial differential form of the mass accumulation term considering free and
152
adsorbed gas in a porous medium with constant porosity containing multi-component single-phase
153
gas is as follows:
yi 1 qa ,i t t
1 s P VL,i yi t RT sc PL ,i sc
(9) Pyi Nc y t j 1 P j 1 PL , j
.
154
According to mass conservation, the above term must be equal to the negative divergence of the
155
flux of component i disregarding sink/source term. The flow vector term of the system considering
156
viscous flow, slip flow and Knudsen diffusion in a 1D linear model is given by Equation 10.
. F i
k b P Dkn ,i Pyi yi D 1 i P x RT x Z x
.
(10)
157
Using the real gas law for molar density P / ZRT and isothermal flow assumption, the final
158
form of the mass conservation equation in the system of interest is obtained as given by Equation
159
11.
sc Pyi Pyi 1 sTP VL ,i sc Nc y t Z t T PL ,i j 1 P j 1 PL , j yi k D P Py P bi Dkn,i i . x Z x x Z
(11)
160
9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 10 of 30
161
The above equation is actually a system of coupled partial differential equations which is solved
162
for pressure and the mole fractions of ( N c 1) components, considering that mole fractions must
163
add up to unity ( yi 1) . i
44
164
The gas compressibility factor is obtained using the Peng-Robinson equation of state
and the
165
Lee correlation is utilized to calculate gas viscosity 45.
166
Appropriate initial and boundary conditions are prescribed to the system. The pressure and gas
167
composition are initially set at the values presented in Table 1. Transmissibilities are set to zero at
168
the left end of the model (no-flow boundary condition). Constant pressure of 1000 psia and zero
169
concentration gradient of the components are the conditions at the right boundary.
170 171 172
2.3 Rate transient analysis The gas diffusivity equation can be expressed as
c k
t
(12)
2 ,
173
where is the real gas pseudopotential presented as the following integral from a reference
174
pressure ( pref ) to an arbitrary pressure ( p )
( p) 2
p
pr ef
46:
(13)
P dP. Z
175
The solution to the gas linear flow equation in an infinite reservoir producing under a constant
176
pressure condition is given by 47
10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
(14)
1 2 t DA , qD
177
where the dimensionless gas flow rate (qD ) and dimensionless time based on cross-sectional area
178
to flow ( Ac ) are defined below.
1 k Ac ( pi ) ( pw ) , qD 1424qg T
t DA
(15)
(16)
0.006328kt , ct i Ac
179
where k is the reservoir permeability in mD, pi and pw represent the initial reservoir and constant
180
flowing pressure in psia, respectively, qg denotes the gas production rate in Mscf / day, is the
181
gas viscosity in cp, c is the gas isothermal compressibility in psia 1 and subscript i refers to the
182
initial state.
183
The following procedure is employed in this study to obtain the apparent gas permeability for the
184
numerically simulated cases. The reciprocal of the gas production rate versus time on a log-log
185
plot results in a half-slope straight line. The half-slope line determines the beginning and end of
186
the linear flow period. The point at which the solution deviates from half slope is the start of the
187
boundary-dominated flow. After substitutions and rearrangement of Equations 14 to 16 and
188
recognizing the fact that the plot of the reciprocal of the gas production rate versus the square root
189
of time generates a straight line, the following equation is obtained to find the apparent gas
190
permeability for different case studies 30: k Ac
1262T
( pi ) ( pw ) mcp c i
,
(17)
11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
191 192
Page 12 of 30
where mcp denotes the slope of the constant-pressure straight line.
2.4 Methodology
193
The transport mechanisms considered here make the system of equations highly nonlinear, hence
194
a numerical solution approach is inevitable. The equations are discretized using backward
195
differences in time and centered differences in space, and upwinding is used to estimate the values
196
of the parameters at block interfaces. There are N c unknowns/independent equations per grid
197
block, so a system of algebraic equations with a dimension of N c N b should be solved at each
198
time step, where N b is the number of grid blocks. The Newton-Raphson iterative approach is used
199
to obtain the unknown values (pressure and composition) at the next time step fully implicitly and
200
march in time. The convergence criterion is the norm of the residual vector (the difference between
201
the temporal and spatial sides of Equation 11) to be lower than a threshold 104 .
202
The procedure to obtain the apparent gas permeability is described as follows. For a fixed set of
203
reservoir shale properties, two scenarios are simulated using the same Darcy permeability (k D ).
204
One scenario is the simulation of a gas production from a shale matrix block filled with methane
205
under the effect of pure Darcy flow, and the second scenario is the simulation of methane
206
production where all the involved transport mechanisms are considered. Gas production rates
207
versus time are obtained and the linear flow period is determined for each scenario from the log-
208
log plot of the reciprocal of gas production rate versus time. Next, the square-root-of-time plots
209
are generated and the slope of the constant-pressure straight line over the linear flow period is
210
measured on each plot (mcp1 and mcp 2 ). The slope is inversely proportional to the square root of
211
permeability as shown in Equation 17. Assuming a permeability equal to the input Darcy 12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 13 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
212
permeability (k D ) for the first scenario, an apparent permeability (kapp ) is obtained for the second
213
scenario from the ratio of the constant-pressure line slopes. This apparent permeability once
214
incorporated into a Darcy model with single-component gas with the average properties of the
215
reservoir gas is expected to recover the production behavior of a multi-component and multi-
216
mechanistic gas production leading to a significant saving in the computational time. This
217
procedure is validated by comparing the simulation results of a multi-component and multi-
218
mechanistic case with Darcy permeability (k D ) against those of a single-component Darcy flow
219
with the apparent permeability (kapp ). A flowchart summarizing the above procedure is presented
220
in Figure 1.
221
In the following, the applicability of the proposed apparent gas permeability is validated and then
222
tested on two case studies with two sets of rock properties and different gas compositions. In case
223
that gas production data from a shale core plug are available, this procedure can be applied on our
224
model with the shale properties to obtain the apparent permeability and substitute it for Darcy
225
permeability in the grid blocks of the reservoir simulation model. The advantage of the apparent
226
gas permeability is a large reduction in computational time without imposing a significant error.
13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 14 of 30
Fluid data (composition) and Rock data (Darcy permeability, porosity, tortuosity, medium length, sorption properties)
Multi-mechanistic flow simulation of methane production with kD (1)
Darcy flow simulation of methane production with kD (2)
Apply rate transient analysis to the simulation results (mcp1, mcp2)
Multi-mechanistic and multicomponent flow simulation with kD
Apparent gas permeability kapp=kD (mcp2/mcp1)2
Darcy flow simulation of gas production with kapp
227 228
Figure 1. The flowchart of the procedure of obtaining apparent gas permeability and validation.
229
3
230
Results and discussion 3.1 Apparent gas permeability (Case study I)
231
In this section, two simulation scenarios are performed in the first step to obtain the apparent
232
permeability. The reservoir rock properties, pressures and temperature are those from Table 1. A
233
grid spacing of 0.02 m (200 grid blocks for the length of 4 m) was selected as the optimal size
234
after conducting sensitivity analysis. One scenario is methane production under the effect of pure
235
Darcy flow. The second is methane production including the effects of all the transport 14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 15 of 30
236
mechanisms including viscous flow, slip flow (Klinkenberg effect), Knudsen diffusion, sorption,
237
pore radius change and real gas effect on shale gas production. The log-log plots of the reciprocal
238
of the gas production rate versus time are generated and the beginning and end of the half slope
239
line is determined for each case. The above plot for the second scenario is shown in Figure 2. The
240
half-slope line is tangent to the curve after very early time to the point where the boundary
241
dominated flow starts. This period is known as the linear flow period.
242 243
1e-2
1e-3 1/q (day/Mscf)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
1
1e-4
2
1e-5
1e-6 0.001 244
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
t (day)
245
Figure 2. The log-log plot of the reciprocal of gas efflux versus time for the multi-component multi-
246
mechanistic gas flow in shale medium including viscous flow, slip flow (Klinkenberg effect), Knudsen
247
diffusion, sorption, pore radius variation and real gas effect with Darcy permeability of 100 nD.
15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
248
Then, the reciprocal of rates are plotted versus the square root of time, the slope of the constant-
249
pressure lines (mcp ) are measured and the apparent permeability is obtained from Equation 17
250
(from the ratio of the slopes of the constant-pressure lines following the procedure explained in
251
the “Methodology” section) for the second scenario where all the mechanisms are involved. The
252
square-root-of-time plot for the second scenario is presented in Figure 3 as an example. This
253
process yields a permeability of about 190 nD for the second scenario, which is an indication that
254
the apparent permeability is higher than Darcy permeability.
0.0025
0.0020 1/q (day/Mscf)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 16 of 30
0.0015
0.0010
0.0005 mcp=8.4x10-5 (day)0.5/Mscf
0.0000 0
2
4
6
8
10
12
t1/2 (day1/2)
255 256
Figure 3. The log-log plot of the reciprocal of gas efflux versus square-root-of-time for multi-mechanistic
257
case with Darcy permeability of 100 nD.
258 259
The above apparent permeability is used in the later simulations of this case study. In the first
260
experiment, one simulation is conducted with the multi-component gas mixture and reservoir
261
properties of the base case (refer to Table 1) where all the mechanisms are included. Another 16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 17 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
262
simulation is performed with a Darcy permeability of 190 nD including one single lumped
263
component with the average gas properties of the same mixture. The only mechanism included in
264
this scenario is Darcy flow. The computational time of the latter is by an order of magnitude lower
265
than that of the former (three hours compared to 45 hours on a desktop quad core computer). It is
266
expected that the results of the single-component case (only Darcy flow, permeability of 190 nD)
267
compares well with the multi-component multi-mechanistic case (permeability of 100 nD).
268
The temporal variation of pressure at the no-flux boundary of the medium and gas production rate
269
versus time are shown in Figures 4 and 5, respectively. As can be viewed, the error caused by
270
lumping the components into a single one and replacing Darcy permeability with the obtained
271
apparent permeability is negligible compared to the case with a permeability of 100 nD where a
272
multi-component gas is produced by the coupled effects of viscous flow, slip flow, Knudsen
273
diffusion and sorption. The pressure deviation is insignificant and the temporal average pressures
274
are almost the same. The gas production rates also match perfectly except a small difference
275
observed towards the end of the simulation time.
17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
5000 4500 multi-component, 100 nD
Pressure (psia)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 18 of 30
4000 3500 3000
single component, 190 nD
2500 2000 1500 0
276
20
40
60
80
100
120
t (day)
277
Figure 4. Temporal variation of pressure at the no-flux boundary for the multi-component multi-
278
mechanistic case (k 100 nD ) and single component Darcy flow (k 190 nD ). The multi-mechanistic
279
case simulates flow of multi-component gas in shale medium including viscous flow, slip flow
280
(Klinkenberg effect), Knudsen diffusion, sorption, pore radius variation and real gas effect with the
281
properties of the base case. The single component case simulates Darcy flow of a single-component gas
282
with an apparent permeability obtained from the multi-mechanistic case.
283
18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 19 of 30
1e+6
multi-component, 100 nD single component, 190 nD
1e+5 q (Mscf/day)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
1e+4
1e+3
1e+2 0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
t (day)
284 285
Figure 5. Efflux of gas versus time for the multi-component multi-mechanistic base case (solid line) and
286
single component Darcy flow (dashed line). The apparent permeability used in Darcy flow simulations is
287
190 nD, which is obtained from the multi-mechanistic case.
288
The above upscaling task was carried out to validate the procedure of simplifying the simulations
289
by using an apparent permeability. The apparent permeability depends on pressure, average pore
290
size and gas type
291
generalization of the proposed upscaling notion. A confident answer to this question and the
292
sensitivity of the apparent permeability to different parameters require a comprehensive
293
investigation; however, to check the applicability of the concept, gas composition is selected as a
294
test measure.
295
In the second experiment of this case study, simulations were conducted using the data provided
296
in Table 1 with different methane mole fractions of 0.7 and 0.8. The apparent permeability
11.
An important question that needs to be addressed is related to the
19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
297
obtained from the previous step (kapp 190 nD) was used on a single component with average gas
298
properties and including only the effect of Darcy flow. Figures 6 and 7 show the results of the two
299
scenarios. The gas production rate from the simplified scenario with an apparent permeability of
300
kapp 190 nD is reasonably accurate when compared with the complex multi-mechanistic case. In
301
a second case study, the applicability of the procedure will be tested on a different set of properties
302
for the reservoir model.
1e+6 multi-component, 100 nD single component, 190 nD
1e+5 q (Mscf/day)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 20 of 30
1e+4
1e+3
1e+2 0.001
303
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
t (day)
304
Figure 6. Efflux of gas versus time for the multi-component multi-mechanistic case (solid line) with
305
k 100 nD, yC1 0.7 and single component Darcy flow (dashed line) with k 190 nD .
20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 21 of 30
1e+6 multi-component, 100 nD single component, 190 nD
1e+5 q (Mscf/day)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
1e+4
1e+3
1e+2 0.001
306
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
t (day)
307
Figure 7. Efflux of gas versus time for the multi-component multi-mechanistic case (solid line) with
308
k 100 nD, yC1 0.8 and single-component Darcy flow (dashed line) with k 190 nD .
309 310
3.2 Apparent gas permeability (Case study II)
311
The sole effect of composition was investigated in the previous case study. To confirm the validity
312
of the model, a system with different properties than those of the base case is selected. A
313
permeability of 200 nD, porosity of 0.15, medium length of 6 m, Initial pressure of 4500 psia,
314
temperature of 70C and tortuosity of 10 are assigned to the second case study. A grid spacing
315
of 0.024 m (250 grid blocks for the length of 6 m) was selected as the optimal size after
316
conducting sensitivity analysis. The same procedure explained under the section of
317
“Methodology” was repeated; i.e., one simulation of methane production under the effect of pure
318
Darcy flow and another including all the contributing mechanisms were performed and the slopes
21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
319
of the constant-pressure lines on the square-root-of-time plot were employed to obtain the apparent
320
gas permeability. The acquired apparent permeability is 280 nD.
321
Then three experiments are carried out with mole fractions of 0.7, 0.8 and 0.9 for methane with
322
Darcy permeability of 200 nD and including all the mechanisms involved, namely viscous flow,
323
slip flow, Knudsen diffusion, adsorption/desorption, pore enlargement and real gas effect. For each
324
experiment, a simulation on a single-component gas with the average properties of the original
325
mixture and apparent permeability of 280 nD is conducted. The results of the temporal change of
326
gas efflux for the above experiments are depicted in Figures 8 to 10.
1e+6 multi-component, 200 nD single component, 280 nD
q (Mscf/day)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 22 of 30
1e+5
1e+4
1e+3 0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
t (day)
327 328
Figure 8. Efflux of gas versus time for the multi-component multi-mechanistic case (solid line) with
329
k 200 nD, yC1 0.7 and single component Darcy flow (dashed line) with k 280 nD .
330 331 332 333
22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 23 of 30
1e+6 multi-component, 200 nD single component, 280 nD
q (Mscf/day)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
1e+5
1e+4
1e+3 0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
t (day)
334 335
Figure 9. Efflux of gas versus time for the multi-component multi-mechanistic case (solid line) with
336
k 200 nD, yC1 0.8 and single component Darcy flow (dashed line) with k 280 nD .
337 338 339
23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1e+6 multi-component, 200 nD single component, 280 nD
q (Mscf/day)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 24 of 30
1e+5
1e+4
1e+3 0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
t (day)
340 341
Figure 10. Efflux of gas versus time for the multi-component multi-mechanistic case (solid line) with
342
k 200 nD, yC1 0.9 and single component Darcy flow (dashed line) with k 280 nD .
343 344 345
As can be viewed in the above figures, the proposed proxy acts perfectly well and the model is
346
capable of yielding accurate results by approximately an order of magnitude faster. The
347
experiments with lower methane mole fractions were also conducted for our own test and
348
acceptable results were achieved. The validity of the simplifying assumptions and the applicability
349
of representing all the contributing mechanisms in a single term, namely apparent permeability,
350
are realized. This can provide a basis and guideline to reduce computational load in large-scale
351
numerical reservoir simulations of gas production from shale media. Although the model is one-
352
dimensional, if compositional gas production data are available from experimental measurements
353
on shale core plugs, the model and procedure developed in this study can be applied to assign
354
different apparent permeabilities, including the effects of multiple transport mechanisms, to
355
heterogeneous shale gas reservoirs. 24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 25 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
356 357
4
358
A numerical model was presented to simulate efflux of gas from shale matrix blocks. Various
359
contributing transport mechanisms including viscous and slip flow, Knudsen diffusion, gas
360
adsorption/desorption, pore enlargement and real gas effect are included in the simulations. A
361
combination of all of these mechanisms responsible for flow of multi-component gas in shale
362
media have not been reported in literature. In particular, we have included the effect of sorption
363
and pore enlargement. These are significant phenomena, ignoring whose effect could cause a
364
significant error in the prediction of gas efflux from matrix blocks of shale media and
365
underestimation of the shale apparent permeability.
366
Compositional simulation of multi-mechanistic gas flow in shale media is computationally very
367
challenging. An important question that was addressed in this work is the possibility of lumping
368
all the components into a single one while maintaining accuracy of the prediction of gas efflux
369
from shale media. The results show that the analysis of multi-component gas efflux versus time
370
(the reciprocal of gas efflux versus the square root of time) from shale media can be used to obtain
371
an apparent permeability. The obtained apparent permeability when used in a single-component
372
Darcy flow model enables us to predict the gas efflux from a shale matrix block with high accuracy.
373
The model is one-dimensional and homogeneous which does not capture the effects of three-
374
dimensional phenomena, heterogeneity and water film in shale matrix; however, it can be suitably
375
utilized to simulate the experimental gas production data and obtain apparent gas permeability for
376
grid blocks of a shale gas reservoir model. The proposed lumping scheme can significantly reduce
377
the computational burden of multi-component multi-mechanistic gas flow simulation and will find
378
applications in large-scale numerical simulation of gas production from shale media.
Summary and Conclusions
25 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 26 of 30
379
Acknowledgments
380 381 382
The authors would like to thank two reviewers for their constructive comments. The financial support of NSERC/Energi Simulation and Alberta Innovates (iCORE) Chairs in the Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering at the University of Calgary is greatly appreciated.
383
26 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 27 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
384
References
385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427
1. Polczer, S., Shale expected to supply half of North America’s gas. Calgary Herald, April 2009, 9. 2. Darabi, H.; Ettehad, A.; Javadpour, F.; Sepehrnoori, K., Gas flow in ultra-tight shale strata. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 2012, 710, 641-658. 3. Gale, J. F.; Holder, J. In Natural fractures in some US shales and their importance for gas production, Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference Series, 2010; Geological Society of London: 2010; pp 1131-1140. 4. Zhang, Q.; Su, Y.; Wang, W.; Lu, M.; Sheng, G., Gas transport behaviors in shale nanopores based on multiple mechanisms and macroscale modeling. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 2018, 125, 845-857. 5. Javadpour, F., Nanopores and apparent permeability of gas flow in mudrocks (shales and siltstone). Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 2009, 48, (08), 16-21. 6. Loucks, R. G.; Reed, R. M.; Ruppel, S. C.; Hammes, U., Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores. AAPG bulletin 2012, 96, (6), 1071-1098. 7. Ho, C.-M.; Tai, Y.-C., Micro-electro-mechanical-systems (MEMS) and fluid flows. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 1998, 30, (1), 579-612. 8. Roy, S.; Raju, R.; Chuang, H. F.; Cruden, B. A.; Meyyappan, M., Modeling gas flow through microchannels and nanopores. Journal of applied physics 2003, 93, (8), 4870-4879. 9. Javadpour, F.; Fisher, D.; Unsworth, M., Nanoscale gas flow in shale gas sediments. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 2007, 46, (10). 10. Swami, V.; Settari, A. T.; Javadpour, F. In A numerical model for multi-mechanism flow in shale gas reservoirs with application to laboratory scale testing, EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE Europec, 2013; Society of Petroleum Engineers: 2013. 11. Singh, H.; Javadpour, F. In Nonempirical apparent permeability of shale, 2013; Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTEC): 2013. 12. Shabro, V.; Torres-Verdin, C.; Javadpour, F. In Numerical simulation of shale-gas production: from pore-scale modeling of slip-flow, Knudsen diffusion, and Langmuir desorption to reservoir modeling of compressible fluid, North American Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition, 2011; Society of Petroleum Engineers: 2011. 13. Song, W.; Yao, J.; Li, Y.; Sun, H.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Sui, H., Apparent gas permeability in an organic-rich shale reservoir. Fuel 2016, 181, 973-984. 14. Wang, H.; Marongiu-Porcu, M., Impact of shale-gas apparent permeability on production: combined effects of non-darcy flow/gas-slippage, desorption, and geomechanics. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering 2015, 18, (04), 495-507. 15. Civan, F., Effective correlation of apparent gas permeability in tight porous media. Transport in porous media 2010, 82, (2), 375-384. 16. Sakhaee-Pour, A.; Bryant, S., Gas permeability of shale. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering 2012, 15, (04), 401-409. 17. Beskok, A.; Karniadakis, G. E., Report: a model for flows in channels, pipes, and ducts at micro and nano scales. Microscale Thermophysical Engineering 1999, 3, (1), 43-77. 18. Barisik, M.; Beskok, A., Molecular dynamics simulations of shear-driven gas flows in nano-channels. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 2011, 11, (5), 611-622. 27 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473
Page 28 of 30
19. Chen, L.; Zhang, L.; Kang, Q.; Viswanathan, H. S.; Yao, J.; Tao, W., Nanoscale simulation of shale transport properties using the lattice Boltzmann method: permeability and diffusivity. Scientific reports 2015, 5, 8089. 20. Zhang, J., Lattice Boltzmann method for microfluidics: models and applications. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 2011, 10, (1), 1-28. 21. Singh, H.; Javadpour, F., Langmuir slip-Langmuir sorption permeability model of shale. Fuel 2016, 164, 28-37. 22. Akkutlu, I. Y.; Fathi, E., Multiscale gas transport in shales with local kerogen heterogeneities. SPE journal 2012, 17, (04), 1,002-1,011. 23. Shabro, V.; Torres-Verdín, C.; Javadpour, F.; Sepehrnoori, K., Finite-difference approximation for fluid-flow simulation and calculation of permeability in porous media. Transport in porous media 2012, 94, (3), 775-793. 24. Mehmani, A.; Prodanović, M.; Javadpour, F., Multiscale, multiphysics network modeling of shale matrix gas flows. Transport in porous media 2013, 99, (2), 377-390. 25. Chen, L.; Kang, Q.; Pawar, R.; He, Y.-L.; Tao, W.-Q., Pore-scale prediction of transport properties in reconstructed nanostructures of organic matter in shales. Fuel 2015, 158, 650-658. 26. Rezaveisi, M.; Javadpour, F.; Sepehrnoori, K., Modeling chromatographic separation of produced gas in shale wells. International Journal of Coal Geology 2014, 121, 110-122. 27. Bahrami, N.; Pena, D.; Lusted, I., Well test, rate transient analysis and reservoir simulation for characterizing multi-fractured unconventional oil and gas reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology 2016, 6, (4), 675-689. 28. Arps, J. J., Analysis of decline curves. Transactions of the AIME 1945, 160, (01), 228-247. 29. Fetkovich, M. J., Decline curve analysis using type curves. Journal of Petroleum Technology 1980, 32, (06), 1,065-1,077. 30. Wattenbarger, R. A.; El-Banbi, A. H.; Villegas, M. E.; Maggard, J. B. In Production analysis of linear flow into fractured tight gas wells, SPE rocky mountain regional/lowpermeability reservoirs symposium, 1998; Society of Petroleum Engineers: 1998. 31. Nobakht, M.; Clarkson, C. R.; Kaviani, D., New and improved methods for performing rate-transient analysis of shale gas reservoirs. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering 2012, 15, (03), 335-350. 32. Miao, Y.; Li, X.; Zhou, Y.; Lee, J.; Sun, Z.; Chang, Y.; Wang, S.; Hou, C., A new ratetransient analysis model for shale gas reservoirs coupled the effect of slip flow and surface diffusion. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 2018, 124, 1-10. 33. Wang, K.; Liu, H.; Luo, J.; Wu, K.; Chen, Z., A comprehensive model coupling embedded discrete fractures, multiple interacting continua, and geomechanics in shale gas reservoirs with multiscale fractures. Energy & Fuels 2017, 31, (8), 7758-7776. 34. Wu, K.; Li, X.; Wang, C.; Yu, W.; Chen, Z., Model for surface diffusion of adsorbed gas in nanopores of shale gas reservoirs. Industrial Engineering Chemistry Research 2015, 54, (12), 3225-3236. 35. Webb, S. W.; Pruess, K., The use of Fick's law for modeling trace gas diffusion in porous media. Transport in Porous Media 2003, 51, (3), 327-341. 36. Bravo, M., Production of Natural Gas and Fluid Flow in Tight Sand Reservoirs (DOE Publication No. DE-FG26-04NT42132). Applied Research Center, Florida International University, Miami 2006. 37. Freeman, C.; Moridis, G.; Blasingame, T., A numerical study of microscale flow behavior in tight gas and shale gas reservoir systems. Transport in porous media 2011, 90, (1), 253. 28 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 29 of 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496
Energy & Fuels
38. Evans III, R.; Watson, G.; Mason, E., Gaseous diffusion in porous media at uniform pressure. The journal of chemical physics 1961, 35, (6), 2076-2083. 39. Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Guo, P.; Meng, W., Analyzing the adaption of different adsorption models for describing the shale gas adsorption law. Chemical Engineering & Technology 2016, 39, (10), 1921-1932. 40. Guo, C.; Wei, M.; Liu, H., Modeling of gas production from shale reservoirs considering multiple transport mechanisms. PloS one 2015, 10, (12), e0143649. 41. Agrawal, A.; Prabhu, S., Survey on measurement of tangential momentum accommodation coefficient. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films 2008, 26, (4), 634-645. 42. Peters, E. J., Advanced Petrophysics: Volume 1: Geology, Porosity, Absolute Permeability, Heterogeneity and Geostatistics. Live Oak Book Co, Austin, Texas 2012. 43. Shen, L.; Chen, Z. J. C. E. S., Critical review of the impact of tortuosity on diffusion. 2007, 62, (14), 3748-3755. 44. Peng, D.-Y.; Robinson, D. B., A new two-constant equation of state. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals 1976, 15, (1), 59-64. 45. Lee, A. L.; Gonzalez, M. H.; Eakin, B. E., The viscosity of natural gases. Journal of Petroleum Technology 1966, 18, (08), 997-1,000. 46. Katz, D. L. V., Handbook of natural gas engineering. McGraw-Hill: 1959. 47. Arévalo-Villagrán, J. A.; Cinco-Ley, H.; Wattenbarger, R.; Garcia-Hernandez, F.; Samaniego-Verduzco, F. In Transient Analysis of Tight Gas Well Performance-More Case Histories, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 2003; Society of Petroleum Engineers: 2003.
497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505
29 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
506
Page 30 of 30
Graphic for TOC Fluid data (composition) and Rock data (Darcy permeability, porosity, tortuosity, medium length, sorption properties)
Multi-mechanistic flow simulation of methane production with kD (1)
Darcy flow simulation of methane production with kD (2)
Apply rate transient analysis to the simulation results (mcp1, mcp2)
Multi-mechanistic and multicomponent flow simulation with kD
Apparent gas permeability kapp=kD (mcp2/mcp1)2
Darcy flow simulation of gas production with kapp
507
30 ACS Paragon Plus Environment