Evolution of Useless Iron Rust into Uniform Î±-Fe2O3 Nanospheres: A

Subscriber access provided by - Access paid by the | UCSB Libraries

Article

Evolution of Useless Iron Rust into Uniform #-Fe2O3 Nanospheres: A Smart Way to Make Sustainable Anodes for Hybrid Ni-Fe Cell Devices Jianhui Zhu, Linpo Li, Zu-hong Xiong, Yeqian Hu, and Jian Jiang ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/ acssuschemeng.6b01527 • Publication Date (Web): 26 Oct 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on October 28, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 27

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

Evolution of Useless Iron Rust into Uniform α-Fe2O3 Nanospheres: A Smart Way to Make Sustainable Anodes for Hybrid Ni-Fe Cell Devices Jianhui Zhu,a,†,* Linpo Li,b,c,† Zuhong Xiong,a Yeqian Hu, a Jian Jiangb,c,* a

School of Physical Science and Technology, Southwest University, No.2 Tiansheng Road, BeiBei District,

Chongqing 400715, P.R. China. b

Institute for Clean Energy & Advanced Materials, Faculty of Materials and Energy, Southwest University, No.2

Tiansheng Road, BeiBei District, Chongqing 400715, P.R. China. c

Chongqing Key Laboratory for Advanced Materials and Technologies of Clean Energies, No.2 Tiansheng Road,

BeiBei District, Chongqing 400715, P.R. China. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Fax: +86-23-68254969. Tel: +86-23-68254842. *

E-mail: [email protected] (J. H. Zhu); *E-mail: [email protected] (J. Jiang).

† Linpo Li and Jianhui Zhu contributed equally to this work.

Abstract: The large amount of iron rust yielded in steel industries is undoubtedly a useless and undesired product since its substantial formation and recycle/smelting would give rise to enormous financial costs and environmental pollution issues. To best reuse such rusty wastes, we herein propose a smart and applicable method to convert them into uniform α-Fe2O3 nanospheres. Only after a simple and conventional hydrothermal treatment in HNO3 solution, nearly all of iron rust can evolve into sphere-like α-Fe2O3 products with a typical size of ~30 nm. When serving as actives for electrochemical energy storage, the in situ generated α-Fe2O3 nanospheres exhibit prominent anodic performance, with a maximum specific capacity of ~269 mAh/g at ~0.3 A/g, good rate capabilities (~67.3 mAh/g still retains even at a high rate up to 12.3 A/g) and negligible capacity degradation among 500 cycles. Furthermore, by paring with activated carbons/Ni cathode, a unique full hybrid Ni-Fe cell is constructed. The assembled full devices can be operated reversibly at a voltage as high as ~1.8 V in aqueous electrolyte, capable of delivering both high specific energy and power densities with maximum values of ∼131.25 Wh/kg and ∼14 kW/kg, respectively. Our study offers a scalable and effective route to transform rusty wastes into useful α-Fe2O3 nanospheres, providing an economic way to make sustainable anodes for energy-storage applications and also a platform to develop advanced Fe-based nanomaterials for other wide potential applications. Keywords：：Smart evolution, iron rust, α-Fe2O3 nanospheres, sustainable anode, hybrid Ni-Fe cell device

ACS Paragon Plus Environment


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Introduction Over the past centuries, the iron/steel has played a crucial role in shaping our materials and modern urban landscapes. The widespread use of steel products pushes forward continual development and progress on human civilization but also brings about economic losses that mainly stem from the inevitable corrosion when metals are exposed to moisture in air. 1 In the USA alone, at least millions of tons of iron rust would be generated every day, typically on transportation, manufacturing industries and infrastructure/utilities, etc. The total annual costs from corrosion, thereby, may add up to billions of US dollars. 2, 3 Despite the iron rust is a natural product on earth and would not cause severe effects on our environment and human health, its substantial formation and existence may lead to formidable issues like mechanical structure failures or even building collapses.1-3 To reduce the vast of rusty wastes, current handling approaches are the recycle of such corrosives via high-temperature smelting methods.1, 2 Though these treatments are rather direct and effective to reuse iron resources, their recovery is at the sacrifice of both high energy and expenditure, meantime leading to extra air/dust pollutions and greenhouse gas emissions.1-5 Besides, the reused iron/steel would also have to suffer from the secondary corrosion problems, giving rise to additional financial losses. How humans process the large amount of rusty things into useful products via more rational, preferable and cost-effective alternative routes is quite desirable but still needs our serious reconsidering. The energy storage has nowadays become a global concern because it possesses a wide range of critical applications (e.g., electronic consumables, modern electric vehicles and large-scale electrical grids, etc.) and plays a dominant role in the development of sustainable society.6, 7 Researches on rechargeable power sources using aqueous electrolytes (e.g., lithium salt/alkaline solutions) have triggered great interest recently, since water itself is the safest electrolyte and moreover abundant/friendly to our environment when compared to non-aqueous counterparts like ethylene ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 27

Page 3 of 27

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


carbonate, diethyl carbonate and dimethyl carbonate which are highly toxic, corrosive and inflammable.8-10 Within diverse power-supply systems, the hybrid aqueous energy-storage devices made up of both power-type and energy-type electrodes can well inherit merits of supercapacitors and batteries, thereby showing great promise to serve as fast charging/discharging power sources in practical applications.11-13 Up to date, many types of aqueous cell constitutes have been proposed.14-16 Among them, such devices using ferruginous nanomaterials have drawn tremendous attention due to multi-electron Faradic reacting properties (based on Fe valence states variation) and great natural abundance of elemental Fe (the fourth richest element in earth’s crust), together with their beneficial nanoscale effects.17-20 Particularly, there are intensive researches focusing on nanosize ferric oxide (Fe2O3) because it is readily available, environmentally benign and more significantly has a three-electron transfer redox behavior (Fe3+↔Fe0).19-22 However, their massive production and practical implementation are severely impeded by many aspects. 23, 24 The initial solution step, in any way, is to find a facile, high-yield, economical and controllable way to produce Fe2O3 nanomaterials, which is the fundamental prerequisite for their future development in energy-storage devices. We herein put forward a scalable and smart strategy to convert useless iron rust into uniform α-Fe2O3 nanospheres for energy storage applications. The collected iron rust is initially ground into powders and dissolved into the nitric acid (HNO3). Afterwards, the as-formed homogeneous solution undergoes a conventional hydrothermal treatment, in which plenty of sphere-like α-Fe2O3 nanocrystals with a central size of ~30 nm are in situ generated via a simple forced hydrolysis reaction. Note that the overall synthesis of α-Fe2O3 nanomaterials is reliable, effective and pretty low-cost; all of the Fe element in final products comes from the pristine rusty wastes, and no other metallic salts or surfactants need to be involved. Such evolved Fe2O3 nanomaterials can directly function as electrochemical actives for the anode of Ni-Fe cell devices. During the half-cell testing, ACS Paragon Plus Environment


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

the α-Fe2O3 nanospheres electrode is able to exhibit outstanding anodic performances. A high specific capacity of 269 mAh/g can be obtained at a current density of 0.3 A/g while good rate capability and cycling performance are also confirmed. As a proof-of-concept demonstration of functions of nanosize α-Fe2O3 in full cells, we purposely construct a device of activated carbons (ACs)/Ni (+) //α-Fe2O3 nanospheres (−) using aqueous KOH as electrolyte. After being fully activated and optimized, this device shows both high specific energy and power densities, with maximum values reaching up to ∼131.25 Wh/kg and ∼14 kW/kg, respectively. These records definitely reflect that our integrated device well combines the superiorities of supercapacitors and thin-film batteries, showing great promise in the development of rechargeable power sources.

Experimental Section Synthesis of α-Fe2O3 nanospheres: The iron rust scraped from corrosives was collected and employed as initiating materials. Typically, 0.2 g of bulky iron rust was firstly ground into powders and then dissolved into ~40 mL of dilute HNO3 (concentration: ~50 %) at a temperature of 50 oC, aided by an ultra-sonication treatment for 15 min. To avoid the air pollution led by HNO3, the overall dissolution process undergoes in a sealed container. Afterwards, the obtained solution was diluted by deionized water until its pH value is increased to ~1.82 (At this point, the total solution volume was recorded to be around 50 mL). The resulting mixture solution was then transferred into a 100 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave, which was sealed and placed still in an electric oven at 220 oC for 2 h. When cooled down to room temperature naturally, the red powder samples were collected by centrifugation, washed with deionized water several times and dried at 60 °C in the oven. For more environmental and sustainable concerns, the used acid solution can be reused to dissolve new rusty materials, or totally recycled by the alkali for other usage (e.g., making fertilizers, et al.). Synthesis of ACs/Ni hybrids: For details, a mixture of 0.15 g commercial ACs powders (model:


Page 4 of 27

Page 5 of 27

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


TF-B520, purchased from Shanghai Sino Tech Investment Management Co., Ltd.; Specific surface area: ~2000 m2/g), 0.7 g hexamethylenetetramine (HMT), 0.3 g Ni(NO3)2·6H2O and distilled water (50 mL) was treated by ultrasonication for 15 min. The resulting suspension was then transferred into a sealed container (80 mL) and held at 95 °C for 6 h. Afterwards, the intermediate of ACs@Ni(OH)2 samples were collected and washed with distilled water several times. The preparation of ACs/Ni hybrids was performed in a horizontal, quartz-tube furnace system. The intermediate samples placed in the center of quartz tube were heated to 450 oC (heating rate: ~10 o

C/min) under the constant N2 flow (50 sccm), kept for 15 min and allowed to cool down to room

temperature naturally. Characterization techniques and battery testing: The morphology and the crystalline structure of as-made products were characterized with a JEOL JSM-7800F field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and a JEM 2010F high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HR-TEM). X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns were measured on a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation. XPS (Thermo Electron, VG ESCALAB 250 spectrometer) was also used to characterize the products. The mass of electrode materials was measured on a microbalance with an accuracy of 0.01 mg (A&D Company N92, Japan). Electrochemical measurements were all performed using a CS310 electrochemical workstation. All working electrodes of Fe2O3 nanospheres were fabricated by the convention slurry-coating method. In details, Fe2O3 nanosphere powders, poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) binder and acetylene black were mixed in a mass ratio of 80:10:10 and dispersed/homogenized in N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) to form slurries. The homogenous slurry was then pasted onto a Ni foam (thickness: 1.5 mm) and dried at 100 oC for 10h under vacuum. The mass loading on each current collector was controlled to be 2.5~4.0 mg/cm2. The fabrication of ACs/Ni counter electrode ACS Paragon Plus Environment


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

is achieved by the same method except that the the slurry mixture was pasted onto a stainless steel foil (thickness: 0.1 mm). For individual electrode testing, the performance was evaluated in a three-electrode system, with a Pt foil as counter electrode and an Ag/AgCl as reference electrode in 3M KOH. Prior to testing, all electrodes were immersed into electrolyte for 15 min. Full HSCs devices were constructed with activated Fe2O3 nanospheres anode and ACs/Ni cathode in opposition to each other in 3M KOH aqueous electrolyte. To balance the charge storage between electrodes, the cathode/anode mass ratio is eventually determined by referring to electrochemical behaviors of both electrodes. Note that before electrochemical measurements on rate performance, all electrodes were pre-activated by continuous cyclic voltammetry (CV) scans (~30-50 cycles at a rate of 10 mV s-1). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were performed by applying an AC voltage with 5 mV amplitude in a frequency range from 0.1 Hz to 100 kHz at open circuit potential. The specific capacities were calculated from galvanostatic charge/discharge curves by using: Qspec. = I×t / 3.6m where I, t , and m represents the discharging current (A), the discharging time (s), and the mass of actives on electrode (g), respectively. The specific energy and power densities (E and P) based on the total mass of actives on electrodes were calculated by according to: ∆t

E = ∫ IV (t )dt 0

P=E

∆t

wherein I is the discharging current (A), V is discharging voltage (V), dt is time differential and ∆t is the discharging time (s).

Results and Discussions It is well-known that unlike the anti-corrosive patina formed on copper, the surface iron rust is very flaky and friable, offering no protection to the underlying iron. Therefore, given sufficient time, ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 27

Page 7 of 27

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


O2 and H2O, any iron substances would entirely convert into the rust that consists of hydrated iron oxides (Fe2O3·nH2O) and iron oxide-hydroxide species (FeOOH/Fe(OH)3).

1, 2

To better save/reuse

these iron resources, we propose a smart, reliable and efficient recycling strategy; that is the evolution of rust wastes into useful α-Fe2O3 nanosphere products, as schematically shown in Figure 1a. The overall synthetic flow is rather simple, and merely involves two major steps comprising: I) the ultrasonic dissolution of rust powders (scraped and collected from corrosives) into HNO3 and later II) the forced hydrolysis treatments, leading to the formation of α-Fe2O3 nanospheres with an average diameter of ~30 nm. This fabrication protocol is based on major aspects as follows. On one hand, the evenly distributed particle size at ~30 nm endows α-Fe2O3 products with notable nanoscale effects. Such a small size can bring about more active sites for electrochemical reactions, greatly enhancing the specific energy density of α-Fe2O3 anodes.

25

Furthermore, it also facilitates the

intrinsic electrode reaction kinetics and promises the utilization efficiency of α-Fe2O3 actives due to the shortened solid-state diffusion pathways for ions in aqueous electrolyte.25 On the other hand, only after a simple and controllable hydrolysis process, nearly all of recycled rusty wastes can evolve into uniform α-Fe2O3 nanospheres successfully. Just like “killing two birds with one stone”, this evolution strategy, which is pretty low-cost and controllable, can not only avoid the high energy consumption and environmental pollution issues caused by conventional smelting treatments but also change rust wastes directly into useful nanomaterials with potential applications in energy storage field. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images (Figure 1b and c) show that the hydrothermally generated powder samples are made up of numerous nanospheres with a typical size around ~30 nm. The small nanospheres have piled up and connected with each other, in the absence of any severe aggregations often occurring for nanomaterials with a diameter less than 100 nm. This loose architecture would be much beneficial for sufficient contact between the electrolyte and nanoactives, ACS Paragon Plus Environment


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 8 of 27

as well as deep/efficient OH- diffusions.26 Transmission electron microscope (TEM) observation (See the inset in Figure 1d) toward α-Fe2O3 nanospheres further reveals that their size distribution is quite uniform, within a narrow range from 10 nm to 60 nm. As summarized in Figure 1d, the major nanoparticle size is centered at ~30 nm (taking up a statistical ratio of more than 40% in total samples), which is in line with previous SEM characterizations. The crystalline nature of each nanosphere is evidenced by the high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) observation (Figure 1e). A well-defined lattice fringe with interspacing of 0.27 nm is presented, which accords well with the (104) facet of hematite Fe2O3.27 With respect to the formation mechanism, we believe that the forced hydrolysis reactions of iron salts in aqueous solutions may well account for the generation of such uniform α-Fe2O3 nanospheres. The overall chemical reactions can be expressed with following formulas: ∆ Fe3+ + 3H 2O  → Fe(OH )3 + 3H +

(1)

2 Fe(OH )3  → Fe2O3 + 3H 2O

(2)

The XRD pattern of as-prepared α-Fe2O3 nanospheres has been shown in Figure 2a. Clearly, all diffraction peaks can be well indexed to hematite α-Fe2O3 (JCPDS Card No. 33-0664). No obvious signals from other impurities are detected. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) is further used to confirm the elemental composition of products. The EDS spectrum in Figure 2b demonstrates that except for Cu signal coming from the loading substrate, only Fe and O elements are involved in the final products. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements are further performed to determine the valence states of α-Fe2O3 nanospheres (See Figure 2 c and d). The high-resolution Fe 2p spectrum shows there are two distinct peaks appearing at binding energies of 710.8 eV and 724.2 eV, corresponding well with Fe 2P3/2 and Fe 2P1/3 spin-orbit peaks, respectively. After curve fitting, a satellite peak at 719.1 eV (marked by box) can be evidently distinguished, which is a representative ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 27

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


fingerprint for Fe2O3. 28-29 While in O 1s spectrum, only a single strong peak is observed at 531.1 eV, which accords well with the results for metal oxide species.

30

To investigate the porosity properties

of α-Fe2O3 nanopowders, samples are then examined by nitrogen (N2) adsorption-desorption measurement. The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm (Figure 2e) with a type H1 hysteresis loop reveals the as-obtained α-Fe2O3 nanomaterials possess a specific surface area of ~39.8 m2/g. Also, it’s interesting to note that there are mesopores centered at ~2.8 nm and ~6.2 nm in dimensions, as distinguished from the pore-size distribution (PSD) plot (inset in Figure 2e). Such mesoporous structures are further verified by TEM observation. The sharp contrast in Figure 2f signifies that on α-Fe2O3 nanospheres surface there homogeneously distributed mesopores with typical diameters of ~3.2 nm and ~6.7 nm, which is highly consistent with above PSD result. The existence of these mesoporous structures would correspondingly increase the redox reacting sites of α-Fe2O3 nanospheres and ensure the utilization efficiency of electrode actives during cells operation for electrochemical energy storage. To evaluate the electrochemical performances of α-Fe2O3 nanospheres, the as-prepared electrode is initially subjected to cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurement in a three-electrode system in 3M KOH solution. As displayed in Figure 3a, there are multiple redox peaks present in the CV curve under a scanning rate of 2 mV/s. During the cathodic sweep, a strong reduction peak can be obviously observed at ~-1.14 V, corresponding to the electrochemical conversion reactions from Fe3+ to Fe2+.

9, 31-34

When scanned to a more negative potential (approaching to the value of hydrogen

evolution), the electrode shows another small peak at ~-1.26 V (marked by a black box), which may originate from the conversion process of Fe2+ to Fe0. 9, 31-34 In the reverse anodic scan, the obvious oxidation peak emerging at ~-0.78V should be attributed to the oxidation reaction from Fe2+ to Fe3+ and the weak one (indicated by a red box) lying at ~-1.12V is due to the reversible phase variation from Fe0+ to Fe(OH)ads/Fe2+.

9, 31-34

The CV test distinctly confirms the realization of full valence



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

state transformation of elemental Fe (Fe3+ ↔ Fe0+) within a potential window of -1.45~-0.5V (vs. Ag/AgCl). CV curves of α-Fe2O3 nanospheres electrode at varied scan rates from 2 to 20 mV/s are displayed in Figure 3b, signifying the reversible Faradic conversions between Fe3+ and Fe2+ play a dominant role in charge storage. Upon the increase of scan rates, the current response is also enhanced. However, there is no significant deformation on CV profiles, suggesting the good electrochemical stability and reaction kinetics of α-Fe2O3 nanoactives. 22 Galvanostatic charge/discharge measurements are also performed at varied current densities toward α-Fe2O3 nanospheres electrode. The corresponding discharge curves with current rates ranging from ~3.2 to ~12.3 A/g have been shown in Figure 3c. Rather than a linear charge/discharge characteristic for electrical double-layer capacitors, the electrode of α-Fe2O3 nanospheres exhibits well-defined potential plateaus, indicative of a typical battery-type electrochemical behavior. The long discharge platform lying at around -0.8V corresponds to the oxidation conversion of Fe2+ to Fe3+, highly in agreement with our former CV records. The stored capacity derived from the charge/discharge measurements have been calculated and plotted as a function of current rates, as shown in Figure 3d. At a current rate of 0.3 A/g, the α-Fe2O3 electrode can deliver a maximum capacity of ~269 mAh/g, comparable to other promising alkaline rechargeable battery anodes.12, 14 Along with the continual rise of current densities, the charge-storage capability declines gradually. However, even at a high current rate up to 12.3 A/g, the electrode is still capable of retaining a capacity as high as ~63.7 mAh/g, which demonstrates the superior rate capability of α-Fe2O3 nanospheres. The cycling behavior of α-Fe2O3 nanospheres electrode is then evaluated by constant charge/discharge measurements at a current density of 4 A/g (Figure 3e). The capacity value of α-Fe2O3 nanospheres initially keeps increasing until the capacity retention reaches to 100% at the 20th cycle, which is mainly due to the electrolyte infiltration and the electrode activation process.35, 36 In the following charge/discharge procedures, the delivered capacity maintains at ~100% over 500 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 10 of 27

Page 11 of 27

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


cycles. Afterwards, though the capacity begins to decline due to electrode kinetics issues (e.g., negative volume expansions caused by repeated phase changes, electrode fatigue, etc.), there still retains a high retention of 80% after 600 cycles. The relative charge/discharge profile at 4 A/g is displayed in the inset of Figure 5e from which each different conversion stage can be found. The reason why the trace for Fe+2/Fe0 conversion is not quite distinct could be associated with electrochemical kinetics limitations of α-Fe2O3.34 Such a nearly symmetric characteristic implies the high Coulombic efficiency of α-Fe2O3 electrodes. We believe that the superior electrode performances of α-Fe2O3 nanospheres should be attributed to their nanosize effects. The uniform and well-dispersed nanospheres with a tiny diameter of ~30 nm possess prominent nanoscale effects like more active reacting sites and shorter pathways for ionic diffusions, which are quite beneficial for the charge storage as well as rate capabilities. Besides, the distribution of ample mesopores on α-Fe2O3 nanospheres surface may also provide additional redox reaction places, helping to promise the large specific capacity of α-Fe2O3 anode and strengthen the electrode kinetics.

26, 36

To obtain

deep insights into the electrochemical reaction process, the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurement has been conducted toward the electrode of α-Fe2O3 nanospheres. The corresponding Nyquist plot is displayed in Figure 3f. On the basis of Randles equivalent circuit given in the inset of Figure 3f, it’s obvious to find that at high frequency region, the intersection (less than 1 Ω) at the real part indicates a very small equivalent series resistance (Rs) for the overall electrochemical system and the semicircle with a diameter of ~0.8 Ω reveals a low charge-transfer resistance (Rct) of α-Fe2O3 nanospheres electrode. 35 Meanwhile, in the low frequency range, the spike with a slope greater than 45o proves a low resistance for ions diffusion in the electrode system.22, 35 A full-cell device is then assembled by coupling the α-Fe2O3 nanospheres anode with ACs/Ni cathode using a 3M KOH aqueous electrolyte. The choice of ACs/Ni as the counter electrode is due ACS Paragon Plus Environment


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

to its special hybrid functionalized configurations that involve both a non-Faradic capacitive component as a fast power-output source and a battery-type Faradic portion as a reliable energy-supply source. By referring to our previous work, the intermediate products of ACs@Ni(OH)2 can be obtained after a conventional hydrothermal process.36 SEM observations in Figure S1 clearly reveal that the ACs blocks are entirely wrapped by Ni(OH)2 thin layers (the thickness for single layer is only ~7 nm).36 After a calcination reduction treatment, the final samples of ACs/Ni can be evolved. The composition of ACs/Ni hybrids is characterized by XRD and the record is present in Figure S2a. Except peaks from ACs, the other pronounced peaks at 44.5o and 51.8o can be well indexed to Ni (JCPDS card No. 40-0850), corresponding to its facets of (111) and (200), respectively. EDS spectroscopy in Figure S2b is also used to verify the composition of ACs/Ni, showing the presence of Ni and C elements (Cu signals comes from the loading substrate). No other elements are detected. Representative SEM images of ACs/Ni are displayed in Figure 4 a-b. It is observed that the commercially available ACs intrinsically have plenty of hierarchical pore structures while the evenly dispersed Ni nanoparticles are adhering tightly to the ACs outer surface. The large amount of pores inside ACs backbones are capable to facilitate the aqueous electrolyte penetration and make prominent capacitive contributions via rapid ions adsorptions/desorption; while the electrochemically activated Ni surrounding ACs may supply sufficient faradic reaction sites to guarantee the specific energy density of entire electrode.35, 36 Figure 4c displays CV curves of ACs/Ni electrode at distinct scan rates. A pair of redox peaks appearing at around ~0.2 and ~0.31V (vs. Ag/AgCl) corresponds well to the reversible conversion reactions of Ni2+/Ni3+.37 Additionally, unlike traditional cases for battery-type materials, the CV profile of ACs/Ni hybrid expands greatly and exhibits a quasi-rectangular shape within the total potential range, which is attributed to EDLC contributions from ACs.38 According to constant charge/discharge tests, the ACs/Ni hybrid electrode demonstrates the specific capacities of 261.5 mAh/g (0.5 A/g), 248.4 mAh/g (1 A/g), 235.3 mAh/g ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 12 of 27

Page 13 of 27

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


(2.5 A/g), 206.5 mAh/g (5 A/g), 185 mAh/g (10 A/g) and 146.8 mAh/g (15 A/g), respectively (Figure 4d). Even when the current rate is increased by 30 times (from 0.5 A/g to 15 A/g), the electrode still maintains 56% of the initial value, fully confirming its outstanding rate capabilities. The construction details for the full-cell device of α-Fe2O3 (-)//ACs/Ni (+) is schematically shown in Figure 5a. The mass ratio of α-Fe2O3 and Ni/ACs is carefully calculated to balance the stored charges in Ni-Fe cell systems by referring to the electrochemical behaviors of each individual electrode (Figure 5b). Figure 5c shows CV curves of the optimized cell device over a potential range of 0~1.8 V at different scan rates. As clearly noted, the CV plots inherit the electrochemical characteristics of both anode and cathode. The quasi-rectangular geometrical shape in CV curves reveals the EDLC features arising from ACs, while the pairs of redox peaks demonstrate the battery-type contributions according to the following equation: Fe2O3 + 3Ni2+ +3OH- + 3e- ↔ 2Fe + 3NiOOH

(3)

The cell performance is further evaluated by galvanostatic measurements and the corresponding charge/discharge profiles at various current rates are present in Figure 5d. The distinct sloping plateaus resulting from faradic processes agree well with former CV analysis. Note that the charge/discharge curves with negligible IR drops are quite symmetric, further proving the good reversibility and reacting kinetics of our assembled device. The Coulombic efficiency always stays beyond ~93.6%, indicative of outstanding electrochemical reversibility of such hybrid Ni-Fe cell devices. By referring to charge/discharge plots, the cell capacities have been calculated and plotted as a function of current rate (Figure 5e). At 0.3 A/g, a specific capacity of 93.3 mAh/g can be achieved. Even at a current density as high as 8 A/g (cells charged/discharged in few tens of seconds), the device can still deliver a capacity of 44.2 mAh/g, retaining ~47.3% of the initial value and reflecting the superior rate capabilities of our hybrid device. The EIS spectrum of full devices is displayed in the inset of Figure 5e. In the high frequency range, the small values of Rct imply a fast ACS Paragon Plus Environment


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 14 of 27

charge-transfer property at the electrode interfacial regions while at low frequency the line with a slope angle larger than 45o indicate a smooth ionic diffusions between the electrode and electrolyte.22 To make clear the relationship between the energy and power densities, the Ragone plots have been made (Figure 5g). This cell device delivers a maximum energy density of ~131.25 Wh/kg at a power density of ~0.35 kW/kg; more strikingly, even at the highest power density up to ~14 kW/kg, a total energy density of ~76.25 Wh/kg can still be retained. Such good energy-storage behaviors are superior to many iron-based full-cell devices in previous literatures.39,

40

The cyclic endurance

towards the cell device is further examined at 4 A/g (Figure 5g). Initially, the discharge capacity of the hybrid device rises progressively due to the slow infiltrations of KOH electrolyte and electrochemical activation of electrode materials. After 100 cycles, a stable electrochemical equilibrium state is built. The capacity retention can always preserve at a high level of ~100% until the prime 400 cycles, and still keep at ~90.2% even after the end of cycling test. To demonstrate the potential in practical use, two device units (with a total effective area of 1 cm2) are connected in series to drive two different-type light emitting diodes (LEDs). Corresponding optical images are manifested in Figure 5 h-i. After 30 seconds of charging, such integrated devices are capable of powering three LED indicators (one red LED: ~1.8V, 20 mA; two yellow LEDs: ~2.1V, 20 mA). Above results reveal the assembled devices hold great promise in practical applications.

Conclusions In summary, a facile and scalable approach has been developed to convert the useless rusty wastes into uniform α-Fe2O3 nanospheres for hybrid Ni-Fe cell applications. Merely after a simple and controllable hydrothermal process conducted in HNO3 solution, almost all of recycled rust can evolve into nanosized α-Fe2O3 products with a high surface-to-volume ratio and large amount of mesopores. When evaluated as electrodes for power-supply devices, the α-Fe2O3 nanospheres ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 15 of 27

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


demonstrate high electrochemical activity and capacity (with a maximum value of ~269 mAh/g), good cyclability (nearly no capacity decay after 500 cycles) and excellent rate capabilities. To check the functions of α-Fe2O3 nanospheres in practical application, a full-cell device of α-Fe2O3 nanospheres//ACs/Ni has been further developed. On account of its outstanding comprehensive performances, such an optimized two-electrode device can light up three LED indicators brightly, showing a great promise as reliable power sources in our daily life. Our work not only provides a convenient, low-cost and effective way to convert rusty wastes into useful α-Fe2O3 nanospheres but also presents a sustainable and affordable platform to produce advanced Fe-based nanomaterials for other wide potential applications covering energy conversion devices and magnetic drug carriers, sensitive gas/electrochemical sensors, catalysis, wave absorptions, etc.

Supporting Information for Publication available: SEM images of ACs and ACs@Ni(OH)2 hybrid precursors; XRD pattern and EDS spectrum of ACs/Ni composite products.

Acknowledgment: We gratefully acknowledge financial supports from the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (SWU 115029, XDJK2016C066) and Chongqing Natural Science Foundation (cstc2016jcyjA0477). J. Jiang would like to thank the supports by Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (SWU 115027, XDJK2016C002). Z.H. Xiong is thankful for the support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (11374242). This project is also supported by Program for Innovation Team Building at Institutions of Higher Education in Chongqing (CXTDX201601011) and Graduate Student Research Innovation (CYS16048).



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 16 of 27

References (1) Waldman, J. Rust: The Longest War. Simon & Schuster, New York. 2015, ISBN: 978-1-416-9159-7. (2) Koch, G H.; Brongers M P. H.; Thompson N G.; Virmani Y. P; Payer. J H. Corrosion Costs and Preventive Strategies in the United States. –report by CC Technologies Laboratories, Inc. to Federal

Highway

Administration

(FHWA),

September

2001,

http://www.corrosioncost.com/summary.htm (3) Armand, M.; Tarascon, J.-M. Building Better Batteries. Nature 2008,451, 652-657. (4) Zhang, Q. F., Uchaker, E., Candelaria S. L., Cao, G. Z. Nanomaterials for Energy Conversion and Storage. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 3127-3171. (5) Dunn, B.; Kamath, H., Tarascon, J.-M. Electrical Energy Storage for the Grid: A Battery of Choices. Science 2011, 334, 928-935. (6) Liu, J.; Zhang, J. –G.: Yang, Z. G.: Lemmon J. P.; Imhoff, C.; Graff, G. L.; Li, L. Y.; Hu, J. Z.; Wang, C. M.; Xiao, J.; Xia, G.; Viswanathan, V. V.; Baskaran, S.; Sprenkle, V.; Li, X. L.; Shao, Y. Y.; Schwenzer, B. Materials Science and Materials Chemistry for Large Scale Electrochemical Energy Storage: From Transportation to Electrical Grid. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 929-946. (7) Liu, C.; Li, F.; Ma, L.-P; Cheng, H. –M. Advanced Materials for Energy Storage. Adv. Mater.

2010, 22, E28–E62. (8) Kim, H.; Hong, J.; Park, K.-Y.; Kim, H.; Kim, S.-W.; Kang, K. Aqueous Rechargeable Li and Na Ion Batteries. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11788−11827. (9) Jiang, J.; Li, L. P.; Xu, M. W.; Zhu, J. H.; Li, C. M. In Situ Packaging FeFx into Sack-like Carbon Nanoreactors: A Smart Way To Make Soluble Fluorides Applicable to Aqueous Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 3874 – 3882. (10) Liu, J. L.; Wang, J.; Ku, Z. L.; Wang, H. H.; Chen, S.; Zhang, L. L.; Lin, J. Y.; Shen, Z.X. Aqueous Rechargeable Alkaline CoxNi2-xS2/TiO2 Battery. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 1007-1016. (11) Wang, H. L.; Xu, Z. W.; Li, Z.; Cui, K.; Ding, J.; Kohandehghan, A.; Tan, X. H.; Zahiri, B.; Olsen, B. C.; Holt, C. M. B.; Mitlin, D. Hybrid Device Employing Three-Dimensional Arrays of MnO in Carbon Nanosheets Bridges Battery−Supercapacitor Divide. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 1987− 1994. (12) Haspert, L. C.; Gillette, E.; Lee, S. B.; Rubloff, G. W. Perspective: Hybrid Systems Combining Electrostatic and Electrochemical Nanostructures for Ultrahigh Power Energy Storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 2578-2590. ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 17 of 27

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


(13) Li, B.; Dai, F.; Xiao, Q. F.; Yang, L.; Shen, J. M.; Zhang, C. M.; Cai, M. Nitrogen-Doped Activated Carbon for A High Energy Hybrid Supercapacitor. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 102-106. (14) Zhang, F.; Zhang, T. F.; Yang, X.; Zhang, L.; Leng, K.; Huang, Y.; Chen, Y. S. A High-Performance

Supercapacitor-Battery

Hybrid

energy

Storage

Device

Based

on

Graphene-Enhanced Electrode Materials with Ultrahigh Energy Density. Energy Environ. Sci.

2013, 6, 1623-1632. (15) Guan, C.; Liu, J. L.; Wang, Y. D.; Mao, L.; Fan, Z. X.; Shen, Z. X.; Zhang, H.; Wang, J. Iron Oxide-Decorated Carbon for Supercapacitor Anodes with Ultrahigh Energy Density and Outstanding Cycling Stability. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 5198-5207. (16) Yang, P. H.; Ding, Y.; Lin, Z. Y.; Chen, Z. W.; Li, Y. Z.; Qiang, P. F.; Ebrahimi, M.; Mai, W. J.; Wong, C. P.; Wang, Z. L. Low-Cost High-Performance Solid-State Asymmetric Supercapacitors Based on MnO2 Nanowires and Fe2O3 Nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 73−736. (17) Wang, H. W.; Xu, Z. J.; Yi, H.; Wei, H. G.; Guo, Z. H.; Wang, X. F. One-Step Preparation of Single-Crystalline Fe2O3 Particles/Graphene Composite Hydrogels as High Performance Anode Materials for Super capacitors. Nano Energy 2014, 7, 86-96. (18) Fu, C. P.; Grant, P. S. Toward Low-Cost Grid Scale Energy Storage: Supercapacitors Based on Up-Cycled Industrial Mill Scale Waste. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 2831−2838. (19) Li, R. Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, C.; Wang, C.; Ba, X.; Li, Y.; Huang, X.; Liu, J. Carbon-Stabilized High-Capacity Ferroferric Oxide Nanorod Array for Flexible Solid-State Alkaline Battery− Supercapacitor Hybrid Device with High Environmental Suitability. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 5384−5394. (20) Lin, Y.; Wang, X. Y.; Qian, G.; Watkins, J. J. Additive-Driven Self-Assembly of Well-Ordered Mesoporous Carbon/Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Composites for Supercapacitors. Chem. Mater.

2014, 26, 2128−2137. (21) Chen, X. P.; Gui, X. C.; Lin, Z. Q.; Zheng, Y. J.; Liu, M.; Zhan, R. Z.; Zhu, Y.; Tang, Z. K. Three-Dimensional α-Fe2O3/Carbon Nanotube Sponges as Flexible Supercapacitor Electrodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 20927-20934. (22) Liu, J. P.; Li, Y. Y.; Fan, H. J.; Zhu, Z. H.; Jiang, J.; Ding, R. M.; Hu, Y. Y.; Huang, X. T. Iron Oxide-Based Nanotube Arrays Derived from Sacrificial Template-Accelerated Hydrolysis: Large-Area Design and Reversible Lithium Storage. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 212−217. (23) Low Q. X.; Ho, G. W. Facile Structural Tuning and Compositing of Iron Oxide-Graphene ACS Paragon Plus Environment


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Anode towards Enhanced Supercapacitive Performance. Nano Energy 2014, 5, 28–35. (24) Zhang, L.; Wu, H. B.; Lou, X. W. Iron-Oxide-Based Advanced Anode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2014, 4, 1300958. (25) Jiang, J.; Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Huang, X.; Yuan, C.; Lou, X. W. Recent Advances in Metal Oxide-based Electrode Architecture Design for Electrochemical Energy Storage. Adv. Mater.

2012, 24, 5166−5180. (26) Xu, F.; Tang, Z. W.; Huang, S. Q.; Chen, L.Y.; Liang, Y. R.; Mai, W. C.; Zhong, H.; Fu, R. W.; Wu, D. C. Facile Synthesis of Ultrahigh-Surface-Area Hollow Carbon Nanospheres for Enhanced Adsorption and Energy Storage. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7221. (27) Wang, H.; Liang, Y.; Gong, M.; Li, Y.; Chang, W.; Mefford, T.; Zhou, J.; Wang, J.; Regier, T.; Wei, F.; Dai, H. An Ultrafast Nickel−Iron Battery from Strongly Coupled Inorganic Nanoparticle/Nanocarbon Hybrid Materials. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 917. (28) Nasibulin, A. G.; Rackauskas, S.; Jiang, H.; Tian, Y.; Mudimela, P. R.; Shandakov, S. D.; Nasibulina, L. I.; Sainio, J.; Kauppinen, E. I. Simple and Rapid Synthesis of α-Fe2O3 Nanowires Under Ambient Conditions. Nano Res. 2009, 2, 373-379. (29) Hu, X. L.; Yu, J. C.; Gong, J. M.; Li, Q.; Li, G. S. α-Fe2O3 Nanorings Prepared by a Microwave-Assisted Hydrothermal Process and Their Sensing Properties. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 2324-2329. (30) Wang, D. W.; Li, Y. Q.; Wang, Q. H.; Wang, T. M. Nanostructured Fe2O3–Graphene Composite as A Novel Electrode Material for Supercapacitors. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2012, 16, 2095-2102. (31) Long, C. L.; Wei, T.; Yan, J.; Jiang, L. L.; Fan, Z. J. Supercapacitors Based on Graphene Supported Iron Nanosheets as Negative Electrode Materials. ACS Nano. 2013, 7, 11325-11332. (32) Kao, C. –Y.; Tsai, Y. –R; Chou, K. –S. Synthesis and Characterization of The Iron/Copper Composite as An Electrode Material for The Rechargeable Alkaline Battery. J. Power Sources

2011, 196, 5746-5750. (33) Guan, C.; Chao, D. L.; Wang, Y. D.; Wang, J.; Liu, J. P. Conﬁned Fe2O3 Nanoparticles on Graphite Foam as High-Rate and Stable Lithium-Ion Battery Anode. Part. Part. Syst. Charact.

2016, 33, 487-492. (34) Guan, C.; Zhao, W.; Hu, Y. T.; Ke, Q.; Li, X.; Zhang H.; Wang, J. High-Performance Flexible Solid-State Ni/Fe Battery Consisting of Metal Oxides Coated Carbon Cloth/Carbon Nanofiber Electrodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 1601034. ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 18 of 27

Page 19 of 27

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


(35) Jiang, J.; Zhu, J. H.; Ai, W.; Fan, Z. X.; Shen, X. N.; Zou, C. J.; Liu, J. P.; Zhang, H.; Yu, T. Evolution of Disposable Bamboo Chopsticks into Uniform Carbon Fibers: A Smart Strategy to Fabricate Sustainable Anodes for Li-Ion Batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 2670-2679. (36) Jiang, J.; Zhu, J. H.; Ai, W.; Wang, X. L.; Wang, Y. L.; Zou, C. J.; Huang, W.; Yu, T. Encapsulation of Sulfur with Thin-Layered Nickel-Based Hydroxides for Long-Cyclic Lithium– Sulfur Cells. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8622. (37) Guan, C.; Wang, Y. D.; Hu, Y. T.; Liu, J. L.; Ho, K. H.; Zhao, W.; Fan, Z. X.; Shen, Z. X.; Zhang H.; Wang, J. Conformally Deposited NiO on A Hierarchical Carbon Support for High-Power and Durable Asymmetric Supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 23283-23288. (38) Liu, J. P.; Jiang, J., Cheng, C. W.; Li, H. X.; Zhang, J. X.; Gong, H.; Fan, H. J. Co3O4 Nanowire@MnO2 Ultrathin Nanosheet Core/Shell Arrays: A New Class of High-Performance Pseudocapacitive Materials. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 2076-2081. (39) Liu, J. L.; Chen, M. H.; Zhang, L. L.; Jiang, J.; Yan, J.; Huang, Y.; Lin, J.; Fan, H. J.; Shen, Z. X. A Flexible Alkaline Rechargeable Ni/Fe Battery Based on Graphene Foam/Carbon Nanotubes Hybrid Film. Nano Lett. 2014, 14 , 7180−7187. (40) Mai, L. Q.; Tian, X. C.; Xu, X.; Chang, L.; Xu, L. Nanowire Electrodes for Electrochemical Energy Storage Devices. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11828−11862.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Figure Captions

Figure 1. (a) Schematic illustration of the evolution of rust waste into uniform ~30 nm α-Fe2O3 nanospheres, (b-c) SEM images, (d) the diameter distribution histogram of α-Fe2O3 nanospheres from SEM analysis and (e) HRTEM image of α-Fe2O3 nanosphere products. Inset in (d) is a typical TEM observation on α-Fe2O3 nanospheres.

Figure 2. (a) XRD pattern and (b) EDS detecting of α-Fe2O3. (c, d) XPS spectra for Fe 2p and O 1s, (e) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of α-Fe2O3 nanospheres; the inset shows the pore-size distribution spectroscopy, and (f) TEM observation towards the mesopores.

Figure 3. (a) CV scan of α-Fe2O3 nanospheres electrode in 6M KOH at a current rate of 2 mV/s. (b) CV plots and (c) galvanostatic discharge curves of α-Fe2O3 nanospheres at distinct operation rates. (d) Specific capacity as a function of scan rates, (e) Cyclic test at a current rate of 4 A/g (the inset is the corresponding charge/discharge curve) and (f) EIS spectrum of α-Fe2O3 nanospheres electrode.

Figure 4. (a,b) SEM observations towards ACs/Ni hybrids. (c) CV tests at varied scan rates and (d) specific capacity as a function of scan rate for ACs/Ni electrode.

Figure 5. (a) Schematic illustration of the hybrid device of α-Fe2O3 (-)//ACs/Ni (+). (b) Comparative CV curves of α-Fe2O3 anode and ACs/Ni cathode at a current rate of 10 mV/s in three-electrode systems. (c) CV plots and (d) galvanostatic charge-discharge profiles of the hybrid device at varied scan rates. (e) The stored capacity as function of scan rate, (f) the corresponding EIS spectrum, (g) Ragone plot and (h) cyclic performance of full device. (i-k) Optical images showing two hybrid devices in series can light up three LED indicators.


Page 20 of 27

Page 21 of 27

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60


207x151mm (150 x 150 DPI)



~30 nm Fe2O3 Nanospheres

H2O/O2 Corrosion

Scraped & Treated in Acid

Forced Hydrolysis

Iron Rust

60 50

Ratio (%)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47

Page 22 of 27

40 30 20 10 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Diameter (nm)

Figure 1


Page 23 of 27

4

1.6x10

30

(116) (122)

JCPDS Card No.33-0664

40

50

60

Cu (background) O Fe Fe

70

0

2

6

3 4

1.2x10

3

8.0x10

3

4.0x10

60 50 40 30

3

Volume (cm /g)

4

1.6x10

0.0012

0.0006 0.0003 0.0000

20

1

10

Pore Width (nm)

10

530

535

540

Binding Energy (eV)

545

100

~39.8 m2 g-1 0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

4

1.2x10

Fe 2p3/2 710.8

Fe 2p1/2

719.1 724.2

4

1.0x10

3

700

710

720

730

Binding Energy (eV)

2.8 nm 6.2 nm

0.0009

0 525

8

0.0015

70

O 1s

dV/dr (cm /nm⋅g)

4

4

4

1.4x10

8.0x10

Energy (eV)

2 Theta 2.0x10

Intensity (a.u.)

Hematite Fe2O3

20

(024)

(113)

(012)

(300) (214)

Intensity (a.u.)

Intensity (a.u.)

(104) (110)

Intensity (a.u.)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47


0.8

Relative Pressure (P/P0)

Figure 2


1.0

740


0.15

Fe2+ to Fe3+

-1.2

0.4

0.05

Fe to Fe(OH)ads/Fe2+

0.00 -0.05

Fe2+ to Fe

-0.10 -0.15

H2 Evolution

-1.4

-1.0

0.0

20 mV s-1 -0.2

15 mV s-1

-0.8

-0.6

-1.4

Potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl)

-1.2

-1.0

2 mV s-1

-0.8

-1.0

-0.6

-0.7 10.5 A g-1 -0.6

12

240

100

10

80 40

Potential (V vs.Ag/AgCl)

120

80 60 40 20

-1.2 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6

0

2

4 6 8 10 -1 Current Density (A g )

12

0

50

100

150

200

250

-1

4.1 A g-1 5.3 A g-1

12.3 A g-1 0

30

60

90

120

150 -1

180

Specific Capacity (mAh g )

8 6

Re

Rct ZW C

4 2

300

Specific Capacity (mAhg )

0

0

-Z'' (ohm)

120

160

3.2 A g-1

-0.8

280 200

7.5 A g-1

-0.9

-0.5


Retention (%)

-1

10 mV s-1

5 mV s-1

-0.4

Fe 3+ to Fe2+

-1.2

0.2

Voltage (V)

-1.1

Current (A)

Current (A)

0.10

Capacity (mAh g )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47

Page 24 of 27

0

100

200

300 400 Cycles

500

Figure 3


600

0

0

2

4

6

Z' (ohm)

8

10

12

Page 25 of 27

Ni/ACs

50 mV s-1

0.08

0.04

-1

0.06

300

40 mV s-1

Capacity (mAh g )

Intensity (a.u.)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47


30 mV s-1 20 mV s-1

10 mV s-1

0.02 0.00 -0.02 -0.04 0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

250 200 150 100 50 0

0

5

10

-1

Current Density (A g )


Figure 4


15


0.15

0.15

10 mV s-1

Cathode Anode

0.05 0.00 -0.05

-0.15

-1.5

-1.2

-0.05

-0.9

-0.6

0.0

0.2

0.0

1.8 A

1.2

g-1

0.9 0.6 0.3

3.2 A g-1

0.0

0

40

80

120

160

200

240

80

60 40 20 0

60

0

20

40

Z' (ohm)

60

80

40 20 0 0

100

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

-1

8

9

100

1

0.01

40

100

200

300

Cycle Numbers

400

500

Cell Ⅰ

Cell Ⅱ

1.2

1.5

1.8

Ref. 9

Ref.40

0.1

1

10

Power Density (KW/Kg)

60 20

0.9

This work

10

Cells Charging

0

0.6

Ref. 39

80

0

0.3

1000

Current Density (A g )

Time (s)

120

Energy Density (Wh/Kg)

1.5

100

-Z'' (ohm)

g-1

-1

2.4 A

Redox Reaction Contribution

Voltage (V)

80

6.2 A

EDLCs Contribution

0.4

120

Capacity (mAh g )

Voltage (V)

0.00


2.1 1.8

2 mV s-1

0.05

-0.10

Electrolyte & Membrane

g-1

5 mV s-1

-0.10

Fe2O3 Nanospheres

Ni/ACs

0.10

Current (A)

Current (A)

0.10

Capacity Ratio (%)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47

Page 26 of 27

Cells Discharging

Figure 5


100

Page 27 of 27

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47


Table of Content (TOC)

~30 nm

Iron Rust Wastes

Fe2O3 Nanospheres

Scraped & Treated in Acid

Forced Hydrolysis

Ni/ACs

Fe2O3 Nanospheres

Electrolyte & Membrane

We herein propose a smart and applicable method to convert useless rust wastes into uniform α-Fe2O3 nanospheres. Only after a simple and conventional hydrothermal treatment in HNO3 solution, nearly all of iron rust can evolve into sphere-like α-Fe2O3 products with a typical size of ~30 nm. When evaluated as electrodes for energy-storage devices, the in situ generated α-Fe2O3 nanospheres exhibit prominent anodic performance, with high electrochemical activity and capacity, good cyclability and excellent rate capabilities. A full-cell device of α-Fe2O3 nanospheres//activated carbons/Ni has been further developed, showing great promise in reliable and sustainable power-supply applications.


Evolution of Useless Iron Rust into Uniform Î±-Fe2O3 Nanospheres: A

Recommend Documents