Fate of Artificial Sweeteners in Wastewater Treatment Plants in New

Nov 3, 2014 - I&EC Process Design and Development · - I&EC Fundamentals · - Product .... *Phone: 1-518-474-0015; fax: 1-518-473-2895; e-mail: .... and...
0 downloads 0 Views 401KB Size
Subscriber access provided by University of Cincinnati Libraries

Article

Fate of Artificial Sweeteners in Wastewater Treatment Plants in New York State, USA Bikram Subedi, and Kurunthachalam Kannan Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/es504769c • Publication Date (Web): 03 Nov 2014 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on November 13, 2014

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 23

Environmental Science & Technology

Fate of Artificial Sweeteners in Wastewater Treatment Plants in New York State, USA

1 2 3 4

Bikram Subedia and Kurunthachalam Kannana,b,*

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

a

Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, and Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, State University of New York at Albany, Empire State Plaza, P.O. Box 509, Albany, New York 12201-0509, United States

b

Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Science and Experimental Biochemistry Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia

*Corresponding author: K. Kannan Wadsworth Center Empire State Plaza, P.O. Box 509 Albany, NY 12201-0509 Tel: 1-518-474-0015 Fax: 1-518-473-2895 E-mail: [email protected]

For submission to: Environmental Science and Technology

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

37 38

ABSTRACT Very few studies describe the fate of artificial sweeteners (ASWs) in wastewater

39

treatment plants (WWTPs). In this study, mass loadings, removal efficiencies, and environmental

40

emission of sucralose, saccharin, aspartame, and acesulfame were determined based on the

41

concentrations measured in wastewater influent, primary effluent, effluent, suspended particulate

42

matter (SPM), and sludge collected from two WWTPs in the Albany area of New York State,

43

USA. All ASWs were detected at a mean concentration that ranged from 0.13 (aspartame) to

44

29.4 µg/L (sucralose) in wastewater influent, 0.49 (aspartame) to 27.7 µg/L (sucralose) in

45

primary influent, 0.11 (aspartame) to 29.6 µg/L (sucralose) in effluent, and from 0.08

46

(aspartame) to 0.65 µg/g dw (sucralose) in sludge. This is the first report of occurrence of ASWs

47

in SPM; aspartame was found in 92% of influent SPM samples at a mean concentration of 444

48

ng/g dw, followed by acesulfame (92 ng/g) and saccharin (49 ng/g). The fraction of the total

49

mass of ASWs sorbed to SPM was in the rank order of: aspartame (50.4%) > acesulfame

50

(10.9%) > saccharin and sucralose (0.8%). The sorption coefficients (Kd) of ASWs ranged from

51

4.10 (saccharin) to 4540 L/kg (aspartame). Significant removal of aspartame (68.2%) and

52

saccharin (90.3%) was found in WWTPs; however, sucralose and acesulfame were less

53

efficiently removed ($170 million in 2004.4,5 The global consumption of acesulfame

71

and saccharin in 2005 was 4 and 37 thousand metric tons, respectively.6

72

ASWs are excreted mostly unchanged from the human body, flow down the drain, and

73

are discharged into the environment through wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs).7,8

74

Hydrophilic ASWs (solubility = 565-9.1 x 105 mg/L at 25° C) (Table 1) are not efficiently

75

removed through wastewater treatment processes. For instance, removal efficiencies for

76

acesulfame and sucralose in WWTPs were reported to be saccharin > acesulfame > sucralose, whereas that in the USA was: sucralose >

226

aspartame ~ saccharin > acesulfame. The concentration of sucralose in sludge from the USA was

227

an order of magnitude higher than that found in Korea; however, the concentrations of aspartame

228

and saccharin in Korea were 2–3 times higher than those found in the USA. The differences in

229

the patterns of ASWs in sludge in the USA and Korea suggest differences in per-capita

230

consumption of individual ASWs and the removal in WWTP treatment processes. Sucralose is

231

the most frequently used ASW in the USA and is found in ~1500 products as compared to

232

acesulfame (1103 products) and aspartame (974 products);30 however, aspartame is the most

233

widely used ASW in processed foods at relatively higher concentrations (as much as 5602

234

mg/kg) in Korea.31,32

235

Artificial Sweeteners in Suspended Particulate Matter. This is the first report of

236

occurrence of ASWs in SPM; aspartame was found in 92% of influent SPM samples at a mean

237

concentration of 444 ng/g dw, followed by acesulfame (92 ng/g) and saccharin (49 ng/g). The

238

fraction of ASWs partitioned to SPM was calculated based on the measured concentrations in

239

aqueous (i.e., dissolved) fraction and SPM (equation 1). The fraction of the total mass of ASWs

10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 10 of 23

Page 11 of 23

Environmental Science & Technology

240

sorbed to SPM (PSPM), on average, was in the rank order of aspartame (50.4%) > acesulfame

241

(10.9%) > saccharin and sucralose (0.8%). Aspartame was found to sorb to SPM by as much as

242

91% of the total mass; therefore, estimation of mass loadings of aspartame based only on

243

dissolved fraction of wastewater can underestimate the total load by as much as 91%. In

244

comparison, >90% of the loadings of acesulfame, saccharin, and sucralose in WWTPs were

245

found in dissolved fraction.

246

The sorption coefficients (Kd) of ASWs calculated based on the concentrations measured

247

in influent (ng/L) and SPM (ng/kg dw) ranged from 4.10 (saccharin) to 4540 L/kg (aspartame)

248

(Table 3). Relatively lower water solubility (solubility = 565 mg/L at 25° C) and higher organic

249

carbon partitioning coefficient (Log Koc = 1.786) of aspartame, in comparison with other ASWs,

250

explain the preferential partitioning of this compound to sludge and SPM. Further, the lower

251

concentrations reported for aspartame in aqueous environmental matrices explain preferential

252

sorption of this compound to particulate matter.11,29

253

Removal of Artificial Sweeteners from WWTPs. Both saccharin and aspartame were

254

significantly removed from WWTPs, with an average removal efficiency of 90.3 and 68.2%,

255

respectively (Table 3). The average removal efficiency of saccharin found in our study was

256

similar to those reported in Germany (>90%)11 and China (97%).10 Aspartame was not detected

257

in effluents of WWTPs in China.10

258

Sucralose was not significantly removed from WWTPs ( saccharin and sucralose (0.8%). This study reports

312

aspartame in wastewater samples for the first time in the USA. Aspartame and saccharin were

313

significantly removed from WWTPs; however, sucralose and acesulfame were removed at

314