Walter Slavin The Perkin-Elmer Carporation 901 Ethan Allen Highway Ridgefield, Conn. 06877
I---
1
An analytical technique is rarely replaced or made obsolete by a newer one. Techniques usually complement each other and provide an arsenal for the attack on analytical problems. The analyst must choose from these weapons that which is most appropriate for his or her specific problem. The task of choosing among analytical tecbniques is a difficult one. It requires a clear understanding of the analytical problems in your laboratory and of the capabilities of the different techniques available. Those who are expert in several techniques do not always agree on which to use because the grounds for decision are often judgmental and subtle. Many of us are particularly experienced in one technique and tend to he partial to that technique. Those who have an extreme case of this disease of partiality may tell you that the best analytical technique is atomic absorption (AA), or inductively coupled plasma (ICP) emission, or electrochemistry . . . There is no “best” technique; the choice depends on your skills and on the analytical situation.
Spdmcopk technk#ms Flame AA. Flame AA is very well established. It has few interferences, and these are well identified and often easily controlled. Standardization is usually simple. The equipment is, by now, relatively inexpensive and easy to use. Of the techniques being compared, it requires the least operator experience. 00052700/86/0358-589ASO1.50/0 0 1986 American Chemicai Society
0 But the more refractory elements, for example, B, V, Ta, and W, are only partially dissociated in the flame and are therefore not readily accessible by flame AA. Samples containing metals such as Mo and the alkaline earths are not fully dissociated in the flame, which sometimes leads to troublesome interferences. Elements that have their resonance lines in the very far UV are not easily determined, and these include P, S , and the halogens. Although the technique is rapid, AA instruments are rarely automated to permit simultaneous determinations of several elements. Plasmas. There are several kinds of plasmas that have been considered for Presented at the Australian Speetmsmpy Conference. Melbourne, April 1985
analytical instrumentation, but the most widely used by far is the ICP. The ICP provides detection limits for most elements that are within a factor of two or three times those of flame AA,for some metals a little better, for some a little poorer. Detection limit comparisons are considered below. However, the very refractory elements can be easily determined with the ICP, and those elements that are only partially dissociated in the ilame are usually completely dissociated by the high temperatures achieved by the ICP. It is for this reason that the ICP has been spoken of as freer of chemical interference than flame AA. However, interferences of other sorts are present in the ICP. For instance, high concentrations of inorganic matrix can shift the location of the hot portion of the plasma and therefore alter the signal for specific analytes. Spectral interferences are an important consideration for the ICP, and different lines are preferred for a specific element in different matrices. This sometimes requires that spectroscopic skills he used to solve some difficult analytical problems. However, the ICP is inherently multielement, and modem instrumentation takes advantage of this by using many detectors arranged along the focal plane of the monochromator or by very rapid, sequential scanning of the monochromator. The automation aspects, one of the most valuable features of the ICP, will he discussed later.
ANALYTICAL CHEMlSl‘RY. VOL. 58, NO. 4. APRIL 1986
588,.
Histo* Textile and Paper Materials Conservation and Characterization
Howard L. Needles and S. Haig Leronian, Editors Universify of California-Davis
Explores the conservation and characterization of historic textile and paper materials, an active area of interest to wnservstors, chemists, mnd other physical scientists for w e n i decades. Focuses on the preservation of textiles with historic and artistic valua. Promotes the aharing of knowledge on preservalion and restoration techninues between the scientific and wniervslion communities. CONTENTS Conservation Principlesof Henry Francis du POnt *Age Determination 01 Single-Fiber Textiles * Degradation in Museum Textiles * Fiber Damage in Textile Malefials by SEM Franography of Historic Silk Fibers * Degradation of Silk by Heal and Lighl * PaintsdPrintedChinese and w8Sfern Silks IdentitiCation of Dyes in HistoricTextile Materials Analysis of Nalural Dyes on Wool Substrates Characterization01 Hyacinthine Purple (Tekheleo * Mordanted. Natural-DyedWool and Silk Fabrics * Ellect 01 Aqueous and Nonaqueous Treatments * Characferizalion 01 Metallic Yarns * PrehiSforic Fabrics 01 Southeastern N. America * Slandards b r Archival Materials Kinelics 01 Cellulose Deterioralion * Use of FTlR and ESCA Estimating the Elkctot Water Washing * Discaloralion01 Paper Influence of Copper and Iron on Paper Accelerated Aging 01 Cellulosic Texlilss f
-
-
Basedon a symposium sponsored by me Divislm 01 Cellulose. Paper. end Textile Chemistry of the American Chemicei Socisly Advances in Chemislry Series No. 212 452 pages (1985) Clothbound LC 8520094 ISBN M)412-09008 US (L Canada $94.95 Export 1113.98
59OA
Flpuro 1. Comparison of detection limits fw flameAA, CP, and furnace AA plotted on a log scale of concentration in micrograms per liter Because furnace detection llmiig ere Inherently In mass unit6 (plcogams). thq haw been convwbd lo Concentration by assuming a 20yL sample
Those who are attracted to the ICP for reasons other than automation are usually particularly interested in those metals that can't be determined by flame AA. An important advantage of the plasma is that no special sources are necessary. For instance, one can determine Rh the one time per year it is required without having to retain a lamp inventory. The concentration range of the ICP usually spans three or four orders of magnitude. This is an important requirement for automated analyses. Flame AA spans only two orders of magnitude. Furnace. If the lowest detection limits that can be obtained with spectroscopic techniques are necessary for your problem, the graphite furnace is the technique of choice. On a relative or concentration basis, furnace detection limits are 10 to 100 times better than flame AA or ICP. On an absolute mass basis, furnace detection limits are often 1000 times more sensitive because only a very small sample is required for the furnace. In the recent past, the major limita-
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL. 58, NO. 4, APRIL 1986
tion of the graphite furnace was the many chemical and physicakhemical interferences reported extensively in the literature. Those problems are now largely controlled using a combination of platform technology, new high-quality graphite materials, modern, fast photometric instrumentation, and Zeeman background correction. Although not totally interference free, the level of interferences for the graphite furnace is now no greater than flame AA or ICP. Nevertheless, furnace determinations are slow-typically several minutes per element per sample. They are generally single element; multielement analyses often are not practical. The analytical range is not very large-typically a little less than two orders of magnitude. Thus, the furnace is presently used when the flame or ICP provides inadequate detection limits. Detection limits. In Figure 1 (right side) flame AA and ICP are compared. In addition to indicating that the detection limits of the two techniques are similar, it can also be seen that
Linking Value to Performance.
e-
iter
uores ... .. Detector
SYSt€ Contrc
I
/Ys a new modular concept in HPLC: We call it matcheo mooularity The componentsare matched to each other, matcnedto yoJr separation needs and matchedto your bdget System Control- how much do you need? Whetner yob are looking lor stand-alonecomponents.a simple isocratic pumpplusdetectorSetup or afully automated universalternary gradient system with microprocessor;select the Shimadzu componentsyou need from arangeof modular building blocks For controlled or non-controlledsystems, now you can getallyour LCcomponentsfromone source Thereis no needto get pumpsfrom California, detectorsfrom New Jersey or autosamplersfromMassachusetts Get
Plusa one-year warranty and
as your needschange Match your system to the task. Dodt compromiseyour separation becauseof system limitations any longer Ask forthe facts and discover the Shimadzu secret of value-linkedperformancein HPLC Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc , Columbia, MD 21046, (301) 997-1227
m IX Automatic
I
SHIMADZU
Shimadzu Corporallon Inlsma(ional Marketing Div.: ShinjukwMiui Building. 1-1, NishishinjukU2.chome. Shinjuku-mu. Tokp 160. Japan. Tel: Tokyo 03-346-5641Telex: 0232.3297 SHMm J. Shimadzu (EUIOPB) GmbH: Asker Sfnrse 111.4wO Diisseldoll, F.R. Germany. T d (0211) 666371 Telex: 08586839
F a Literahre Circle 187.
F a a call horn ow repesenlB1Ive Circle 188.
-
1
theyaren compl tary. Refractory metals like Ti, v, and Ba tend to be poor on the flame AA chart, but better on the ICP. In contrast, the very volatile, heavy metals such as Cd and Zn are very good on the AA chart and slightly poorer on the ICP chart. The left side of Figure 1shows the detection limits in picograms for the bulk of the elements determined with furnace AA. The scale on the right side of the figure indicates the concentration detection limits with assumption of a 20-rL sample. Most instrument companies make these numbers look about five times better by assuming a 100-pL sample. In fact, the con. centration detection limits that we show in the figure are achievable in real sample solutions, even in the presence of a massive amount of ma-
trix, if the Zeeman technique is used for background correction. This is the reason for the increasing interest in Zeeman background correction. The comparison of detection limits can be confusing when techniques such as flame AA, ICP, and furnace AA are compared. ICP and flame AA are steady-state techniques. The signal is determined after the sample has been aspirated long enough for the signal to come to some final equilibrium value. Thus, flame or ICP detection limits are usually related to concentration, with the assumption that the amount of sample is unlimited. On the other hand, the furnace technique uses the entire sample and detects an absolute amount of the analyte element. To compare the three techniques on the basis of concentration ignores the advantage of the furnace, which can handle very small samples. But it is meaningful to the analyst who has unlimited sample and does not care about small sample volumes. To compare the techniaues on the basis of absolute detection.limit (say in picograms) is meaningful for those analysts who are working with very small amounts of biological tissue, semironductor materials, or fragments offorensic or art materials. Major element determinations. Although both flame AA and ICP are
Mettler fakes the hassle out of densify measurement.
CIRCLE 142 ON READER SERVICE CARD
592A
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY. VOL. 58, NO. 4. APRIL 1988
mainly used for trace analysis work, the simplicity and speed of both tech. niques make them valuable for major element analysis. Probably, flame AA is still under-used for major element analysis in competition with X-ray fluorescence or gravimetric procedures. At high concentrations of the analyte metal, flame AA signals are remarkably stable, and it is easy to demonstrate a precision of 0.2% relative standard deviation (RSD).Because in. terferences are also typically negligible, this means that an accuracy close to the same level is available if accurate standards can be prepared. Many mining companies use this advantage of flame AA for buying and sellinn precious metals, wher; very smali changes in percentage points can equal large amounts of money. The standard reference method for Ca in serum uses flame AA, using standards that are carefully prepared to bracket the analytical result from the sample. Precision of 0.5% to 2% is easily obtained with the ICP and. with recent improvements, ICP may become competitive with flame AA for acrurate major metal determinations. The ICP advantage of a very wide linear analytical range makes it less necessary to redilnte a sample that may have ex. ceeded the range. Automation. It is easy to misrepreMettler/Paar density meters provide reproducible, accurate density measurements without pycnometers or hydrometers-usually in less than three minutes. And MettleriPaar density meters are so easy to use that no special training or skills are required. Results in units you prefer. Obtain results that can be used immediately, such as g/cms, "Brix, specific gravity, API number, % alcohol, %concentration, or dimensionless engineering units. Results can be transmitted directly to your computer for storage or analytical calculations. Flexible and versatile. Check incoming and finished goods samples. Improve cost controls by ensuring that components are mixed in exactly the right ratio, and even standardize the quality control procedures for all lab and plant locations. Choose exactly what you need. You can select from a complete line of Mettlerhar density meters, including hand-held field units precise to 10.3 glcm3. laboratory models with precisions of 10-4 to 10-6g/cms, and in-line process contro models with a precision of 10-5 gIcm3. Let Mettler take the hassle out of density measurement for you. Can 1-800-257-9535; in NJ. (609)448-3000. Or write to Mettler Instrument Corporation, Box 71, Hightstwn. NJ 08520 for complete technical details and pricing.
-
.. .
.
~. ,
.~
..
,
..
.,
.
Maximize ICP Productivi., With ARL’s New Mini-Torch.
..
., .,
- \ - .
I
. ..
.~
-
I
,
Meet the mini-torch:the most compact efficientplasmatorchever devised. It mak ARCS 3410 ICP Spectrometer ideal for the lab. Or, forthe big labwith a small budget. Becauseitcansaveyou$lO,OWayear.inIC overhead. With the3410,lessisdefinitelymore.Itoffer smaller operatingcosts: the mini-torch cuts argon and power consumptionby a full 50% meanssmaller space requirements: the co system sits on its own integrated storage cabinet. And, it boasts a smaller purchaseprice-the smallest of any complete ICP system.
,
,~
-
. .
4
Research
9545WeniwordSt.. p.O.Aox129, Sunland. . . ~ ,
. .
.
sent the different analytical techniques and particularly different instruments with respect to their ability to handle large numbers of determinations. The situations in which large numbers of samples must be analyzed for a limited number of elements, for example, in the clinical lab or the agricultural test station, favor automated flame AA. The situations in which many elements must be determined in many samples, such as a water test lab or a geological survey situation, favor the ICP. This is because each flame AA determination is rapid, but a significant amount of time is required to change the element being determined. In contrast, because separate light sources are not needed for the ICP, changing between elements is rapid. But it takes longer for the sample to come to equilibrium in the ICP, so that each sample takes a longer time than in flame AA. The automation of flame AA is highly developed. For example, a typical automated system can determine six elements in 50 samples in
