Food Taste Chemistry - ACS Publications - American Chemical Society

sations. Many examples can be found which show these differences. ... posed in relation to one another. ... last two or three decades, its contributio...
0 downloads 0 Views 3MB Size
3 Pungency: The Stimuli and Their Evaluation V. S. GOVINDARAJAN

Downloaded by UNIV OF MONTANA on December 14, 2014 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: December 14, 1979 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1979-0115.ch003

Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore, India 570013

The quality that distinguishes an appetising meal, which one wants to eat, from a collection of cooked components that satisfy merely one's nutritional requirements, is flavor. Aroma, and the traditionally accepted four tastes, sweet, sour, salt, and bitter, are part of most foods and they are further developed or altered during cooking. Even so, most cooked foods are still considered insipid, and require food additives, such as spices, herbs and pot­ entiators, to boost the flavour. The important contributions of spices and herbs to sensory qualities, other than aroma, are the new dimensions, pungency and astrigency. Apart from imparting a specific altered aroma, they increase the pre- and post-ingestion­ al cues which are important in increasing awareness and appreci­ ation of the food, and thereby lead to increased ingestion (1). Thus, the notion of food flavour - which is commonly understood as aroma and taste - should be expanded to cover the contribution of pungency. P u n g e n c y , an a p p r a i s a l o f t h e t e r m 1

A d e f i n i t i o n o f 'pungency i s r e q u i r e d , i f we a r e t o u n d e r s t a n d t h e p e r c e i v e d i m p r e s s i o n , and a t t e m p t t o e s t i m a t e t h e same. The d i c t i o n a r i e s d e f i n e t h e t e r m a s a s t i n g i n g , i r r i t a t i n g , o r caustic property ( O x f o r d ) and ' k e e n n e s s , s h a r p n e s s , p o i g n a n c y ' (Webster). These a r e e i t h e r too g e n e r a l , o r they a r e r a t h e r u n happy c h o i c e s o f d e s c r i p t o r s w h i c h c o n n o t e some u n d e s i r a b l e c h a r acteristics. The word pungent i s a l s o used t o d e n o t e a c r i d o d o r s , a n d , i n t h e g e n e r a l l i t e r a t u r e , i t i s used a l m o s t a s a synonym o f ' h o t ' and ' i r r i t a n t ' . However, w i t h r e s p e c t t o f o o d , f o r w h i c h t h e t e r m 'pungency' s h o u l d r e a l l y be u s e d , i t assumes a d e s i r a b l e quality. When used a t an o p t i m a l usage l e v e l , t h e s p i c e s have a p a r t from aroma - a ' m o u t h - w a t e r i n g ' q u a l i t y . Together with a r o m a , p e p p e r , g i n g e r and c h i l l i e s p r o v i d e t h e ' p i q u a n t ' s t i m u l u s r e s p o n s e t h a t l e a d s t o a g r e a t e r a c c e p t a n c e and h i g h e r i n t a k e o f food. This d e s i r a b l e nature o f the r e a c t i o n , I b e l i e v e , i d e n t i f i e s 'pungency' a s d i f f e r e n t from t h e o t h e r d e s c r i p t o r s used t o d e f i n e the a t t r i b u t e , such as i r r i t a n t , s t i n g i n g , c a u s t i c , e t c . , a l l o f !

1

0-8412-0526-4/79/47-115-053$10.00/0 © 1979 American Chemical Society In Food Taste Chemistry; Boudreau, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1979.

54

FOOD TASTE CHEMISTRY

w h i c h have u n d e s i r a b l e

connotations.

Downloaded by UNIV OF MONTANA on December 14, 2014 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: December 14, 1979 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1979-0115.ch003

We c o u l d a l s o l o o k a t t h e a t t r i b u t e f r o m t h e s t i m u l u s - s e n s a t i o n angle. N o n c r i e f f (_2), i n h i s t r e a t i s e on t h e C h e m i c a l S e n s e s , has c l a s s i f i e d pungency under t h e common c h e m i c a l s e n s e s , grouping i t along with s t i m u l i e l i c i t i n g burning ( h o t ) , i r r i t a t i o n , l a c h r y m a t o r y or c o u g h - p r o v o k i n g s e n s a t i o n s . I would l i k e to submit t h a t a l l these p r o p e r t i e s are d i f f e r e n t s e n s a t i o n s , t h o u g h some c h e m i c a l s m i g h t e l i c i t more t h a n one o f t h e s e s e n sations. Many e x a m p l e s can be f o u n d w h i c h show t h e s e d i f f e r e n c e s . Ammonia, w h i l e i m p a r t i n g a h i g h l y i r r i t a n t and c a u s t i c s e n s a t i o n c a n n o t be c a l l e d p u n g e n t . The l a c h r y m a t o r y s u b s t a n c e o f o n i o n , t h e p r o p a n o l S — o x i d e , i s not p u n g e n t i n t h e mouth, but p r o d u c e s an i t c h i n g r e a c t i o n i n the nose. S u l p h u r d i o x i d e , a cough-provoking c h e m i c a l , p r o d u c e s no p u n g e n t f e e l i n g i n t h e mouth, but o n l y a c a t c h at the t h r o a t . While a d r i n k i n g c o n c e n t r a t i o n of a l c o h o l c o u l d b r i n g a b o u t t h e s e n s a t i o n o f warmth i n t h e t h r o a t , and even a b u r n i n g s e n s a t i o n a t h i g h e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s , i t can n e v e r be c a l l e d p u n g e n t . T h e r e a r e o t h e r compounds i n some s p i c e s and h e r b s w h i c h p r o d u c e a t i n g l i n g s e n s a t i o n on t h e t o n g u e , but t h i s a g a i n i s d i s t i n c t f r o m t h e t y p i c a l s e n s a t i o n o f pungency e l i c i t e d by t h e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c components o f s p i c e s , s u c h as c a p s a i c i n , p i p e r i n e and g i n g e r o l . S i n g l e t o n and N o b l e r e c e n t l y described p u n g e n c y as a h o t , p e n e t r a t i n g , b u r n i n g s e n s a t i o n i n t h e mouth w h i c h a t l o w e r l e v e l s may be warm, s p i c y , s h a r p o r h a r s h . This i m p l i e s that a l l these varying s e n s a t i o n s , are merely concentration effects. Such a v i e w may be a c c e p t e d o n l y i n so f a r as t h e t e r m s warm, b u r n i n g , p e n e t r a t i n g and i r r i t a t i n g a r e u n d e r s t o o d i n t h e i r g e n e r a l l y a c c e p t e d m e a n i n g s ; but o r d i n a r y p h e n o l , w h i c h e l i c i t s t h e s e r e s p o n s e s , w i l l a t no c o n c e n t r a t i o n be c a l l e d p u n g e n t . A l s o , t y p i c a l pungent compounds a t a l l l e v e l s , f r o m t h r e s h o l d t o h i g h e r l e v e l s , a r e c l e a r l y i d e n t i f i e d as p u n g e n t . T h e s e s p e c i f i c s p i c e components a r e p e r c e i v e d as p u n g e n t o n l y when t a k e n i n t h e mouth, w h i l e c o n t a c t w i t h o t h e r p a r t s , s u c h as t h e s k i n , i s f e l t as b u r n i n g o r i r r i t a t i o n ; i n t h e nose as w a t e r i n g , and i n t h e eyes as lachrymatory. W h a t e v e r be t h e u l t i m a t e r e a s o n f o r t h e d i f f e r e n t r e s p o n s e s t o t h e same compound a t d i f f e r e n t c e n t r e s o f p e r c e p t i o n , t h e d i s t i n c t r e s p o n s e as pungency when t a k e n i n t h e mouth i s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h s p e c i f i c compounds, b o t h n a t u r a l and s y n t h e t i c , and r e s t r i c t e d t o some s t r u c t u r a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s ( s e e l a t e r ) . These p r o p e r t i e s / c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s s h o u l d be c o n s i d e r e d s i g n i f i c a n t enough t o a f f o r d pungency a s t a t u s o f i t s own among t h e d i f f e r e n t s e n sory a t t r i b u t e s of food. The n e x t p o i n t f o r c o n s i d e r a t i o n i s whether pungency i s a p u r e l y g u s t a t o r y m o d a l i t y , o r w h e t h e r i t i s a l s o an o l f a c t o r y modality. T h e r e i s a v a s t and g r o w i n g l i t e r a t u r e on t h e i n t e r r e l a t i o n of the s e n s e s , though the e x t e n t of t h e i r mutual i n f l u e n c e s are

In Food Taste Chemistry; Boudreau, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1979.

Downloaded by UNIV OF MONTANA on December 14, 2014 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: December 14, 1979 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1979-0115.ch003

3.

GoviNDARAjAN

55

Pungency

not w e l l u n d e r s t o o d . I t i s , h o w e v e r , a common e x p e r i e n c e t h a t o n c e t a k e n i n t o t h e mouth, f o o d s and b e v e r a g e s e l i c i t a t l e a s t d u a l , u s u a l l y t r i p l e , s e n s o r y e f f e c t s due t o t h e i n t e r c o n n e c t i o n o f t h e t h r o a t and n a s a l c a v i t y , and t h e i n n e r v a t i o n o f t h e r e c e p t o r s d i s ­ p o s e d i n r e l a t i o n t o one a n o t h e r . The s e n s e s o f t a s t e and c u t a n ­ eous s e n s i b i l i t i e s i n t h e mouth, and o f o l f a c t i o n i n t h e nose a p p ­ e a r t o a c t s i m u l t a n e o u s l y i n r e s p o n s e t o a s t i m u l u s . However, t h e s e c o u l d be i n d e p e n d e n t l y e x p e r i m e n t e d upon u s i n g v a r i o u s d e v i ­ ces. As pungent compounds c a n be f e l t i n t h e mouth a t l o w t h r e s h ­ o l d l e v e l s , and n o t by s m e l l a t t h o s e l e v e l s , pungency may be c l a s s i f i e d along with the t r a d i t i o n a l t a s t e m o d a l i t i e s . A d d i t i o n ­ a l l y , as w i t h o t h e r t a s t e s , t h e r e i s l i t t l e o r no v a r i a t i o n o f q u a ­ l i t y , b u t o n l y v a r i a t i o n i n i n t e n s i t y , and an o p t i m a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n for acceptance. The a c c e p t e d d e f i n i t i o n o f t h e t e r m t a s t e , 'one o f t h e s e n s e s , t h e r e c e p t o r s f o r w h i c h a r e l o c a t e d i n t h e mouth and a r e a c t i v a t e d by a l a r g e v a r i e t y o f d i f f e r e n t compounds ( Λ ) , w i l l a c c o m o d a t e t h e q u a l i t y o f pungency a s w e l l , Though most i n v e s t i ­ g a t o r s now l i m i t g u s t a t o r y q u a l i t i e s t o f o u r , n a m e l y , s w e e t , s o u r , s a l i n e , and b i t t e r , A y u r v e d a i n I n d i a , and a l s o t h e s c i e n c e s o f o t h e r c u l t u r e s , r e c o g n i s e d s i x k i n d s of t a s t e ; t h e above-mentioned f o u r a s w e l l a s pungent and a s t r i n g e n t . 1

I would l i k e t o make a p a s s i n g r e f e r e n c e t o t h e d i s t i n c t n e s s o f t h e c h e m o r e c e p t o r s . The r e c e p t o r f o r t h e f o u r b a s i c t a s t e s i s now r e c o g n i s e d t o be a n e u r a l c o m p l e x o f s p e c i a l i z e d , e l a b o r a t e l y o r g a n i s e d c e l l s , d i s t r i b u t e d on t h e t o n g u e i n a l o c a l i z e d f a s h i o n . The r e c e p t o r s f o r o t h e r c h e m i c a l s a r e r e p o r t e d t o be t h e s o - c a l l e d f r e e n e r v e e n d i n g s , and a r e f o u n d t h r o u g h o u t t h e o r a l c a v i t y . Re­ c e p t o r s l o c a t e d on o t h e r p a r t s o f t h e body r e s p o n d i n g t o t o u c h , t e m p e r a t u r e , p r e s s u r e , a r e a l l r e p o r t e d t o have d i s t i n c t i v e n e r v e e n d i n g s , w h i l e f o r i r r i t a t i o n and p a i n no r e c o g n i s a b l e r e c e p t o r b o d i e s have been i d e n t i f i e d (J5). w o u l d f u r t h e r work w i t h t h e more a d v a n c e d e l e c t r o n m i c r o s c o p e s y i e l d f u r t h e r i n f o r m a t i o n and show up d i f f e r e n c e s between t h e f r e e n e r v e ends i n t h e mouth and t h o s e o u t s i d e t h e o r a l c a v i t y ? R e c e n t work i n n e u r o p h y s i o l o g y and e l e c ­ t r o n microscopy has d i s c o v e r e d a c o l d r e c e p t o r f o r former ' f r e e nerve endings ( 5 a ) . Would t h e f r e e n e r v e e n d i n g s o f r e c o g n i s e d t a s t e r e c e p t o r s r e s p o n d t o t h e a p p l i c a t i o n o f s p e c i f i c compounds e l i c i t i n g t h e pungency r e s p o n s e ? The e x t e n s i v e work w i t h c a p s a i c i n by J a n s c o - G a b o r and c o l l e a g u e s ( 5 b ) h a s shown p r o n o u n c e d d e s e w s i t i z a t i o n a g a i n s t a l l k i n d s o f c h e m i c a l s t i m u l i ; i t i s most l i k e l y that receptors belonging t o the slowest conducting C f i b r e s are involved i n i t s effect. A l t e r n a t i v e l y , i s the difference i n the r e s p o n s e t o t h e s p e c i f i c pungency s t i m u l i , w i t h i n t h e mouth and o u t s i d e , r e l a t e d t o t h e l o c a l i s a t i o n of the neural information a t the higher centres of transmission? 1

The w i d e s p r e a d u s e o f t h e t e r m s 'pungent o r b i t e component', ' c a p s a i c i n pungency' o r ' s e n s o r y pungency' has t e n d e d t o be c o n ­ fusing. To r e c o g n i s e t h e c a u s e and e f f e c t r e l a t i o n s h i p c l e a r l y , t h e s t i m u l a n t s h o u l d be i d e n t i f i e d o n l y by i t s common o r c h e m i c a l

In Food Taste Chemistry; Boudreau, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1979.

56

FOOD TASTE CHEMISTRY

name, and t h e s e n s o r y

r e s p o n s e by t h e t e r m p u n g e n c y .

Downloaded by UNIV OF MONTANA on December 14, 2014 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: December 14, 1979 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1979-0115.ch003

E s t i m a t i o n o f Punqency - P r o b l e m s When pungency i s c o n s i d e r e d as an i m p o r t a n t g u s t a t o r y a t t r i b u t e o f f o o d , an e s t i m a t i o n o f t h i s perceiv/ed pungency i s n e c e s s a r y f o r v a l i d a t i n g any q u a l i t y c o n t r o l p r o c e d u r e o f t h e raw m a t e r i a l , or of the prepared food. Even when t h e c h e m i c a l compounds t h a t a r e r e s p o n s i b l e f o r e l i c i t i n g t h i s s e n s a t i o n a r e known i n each raw m a t e r i a l and i n s t r u m e n t a l methods a r e a v a i l a b l e f o r t h e i r e s t i m a t i o n , t h e s u b j e c t i v e e s t i m a t i o n o f pungency i s n e c e s s a r y t o e s t a b l i s h a c o r r e l a t i o n as a g u i d e t o t h e u s e - l e v e l . S e n s o r y e v a l u a t i o n o f f o o d f o r any p e r c e i v e d f o o d q u a l i t y had i n t h e p a s t been c o n s i d e r e d an a r t and i n g e n e r a l very v a r i a b l e ; but over t h e l a s t two o r t h r e e d e c a d e s , i t s c o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e s u c c e s s o f p r o c e s s e d f o o d s h a s been r e a l i s e d . As i n t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f any a n a l y t i c a l method, t h e c a u s e s o f v a r i a t i o n and s o u r c e s o f e r r o r h a v e been s t u d i e d and much o b j e c t i v i t y has been i n t r o d u c e d i n t o t h e p r a c t i c a l methods o f s e n s o r y e v a l u a t i o n (_6_,_7_) · The common u s e o f t h e t e r m ' o b j e c t i v e f o r p h y s i c o - c h e m i c a l measurements and ' s u b j e c t i v e ' f o r e v a l u a t i o n by humans s h o u l d a l s o be d i s c o u r a g e d , s i n c e t h e r e a r e e l e m e n t s o f ' o b j e c t i v i t y ' and ' s u b j e c t i v i t y ' i n both measuring systems. I t i s preferable to specifically state t h e i n s t r u m e n t a l measure and t h e s e n s o r y m o d a l i t y u s e d . Many f o o d l a b o r a t o r i e s a r e p r a c t i s i n g s e n s o r y e v a l u a t i o n by p a n e l s , i n t h e p l a c e o f one o r a few e x p e r t s , i n o r d e r t o a r r i v e a t d e c i s i o n s on t h e raw m a t e r i a l o r f i n i s h e d p r o d u c t q u a l i t y , p r o c e s s c h a n g e , s t o r age l i f e e t c . , (J3) · I t i s h e a r t e n i n g t o s e e t h a t many a s p e c t s o f sensory e v a l u a t i o n of foods a r e r e g u l a r l y d i s c u s s e d a t meetings; and t h a t i n s t i t u t i o n s c o n c e r n e d w i t h s t a n d a r d s and s p e c i f i c a t i o n s a r e , t h r o u g h t h e i r s p e c i a l c o m m i t t e e s , a c t i v e l y (_9) d i s c u s s i n g and c o d i f y i n g d e f i n i t i o n s , d e t a i l s o f methods, g i v i n g g u i d a n c e i n t h e s e l e c t i o n o f methods o f e v a l u a t i o n and a n a l y s i s needed t o answer s p e c i f i c q u e s t i o n s , and e v o l v i n g a u n i f o r m method o f r e p o r t i n g s e n sory evaluation r e s u l t s . 1

I t i s i m p o r t a n t t o c o n s i d e r , a t t h i s j u n c t u r e , i f t h e r e i s any q u a l i t y d i m e n s i o n i n pungency. I n t h e e a r l i e r l i t e r a t u r e , t h e r e a r e some r e f e r e n c e s t o t h e q u a l i t y o f pungency by d e s c r i p t i o n s s u c h as i n s t a n t , v a n i s h i n g , p e r s i s t e n t , e t c . T h e s e o b s e r v a t i o n s on n a t u r a l and s y n t h e t i c compounds w e r e , however, made by d i f f e r e n t p e o p l e , and by p r o c e d u r e s which were n o t s t a n d a r d i s e d . An e x t r e m e example o f t h e i m p o r t a n c e o f c o r r e c t and d e t a i l e d o b s e r v a t i o n i s t h e . . m i s i n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f t h e l a c k o f pungency i n p i p e r i n e c r y s t a l s i s o l a t e d from p e p p e r e x t r a c t s , w h i l e t h e mother l i q u o r had h i g h p u n g e n c y ; t h a t m i s t a k e l e d t o y e a r s o f s e a r c h by many w o r k e r s t o i d e n t i f y t h e n o n - e x i s t e n t isomers o f p i p e r i n e i n pepper ( s e e l a t e r ) . Todd a t al^ have r e c e n t l y o b s e r v e d ( l O ) t h a t c a p s a i c i n , d i h y d r o c a p s a i c i n , and n o r d i h y d r o c a p s a i c i n gave r a p i d p u n g e n t s e n s a t i o n s l o c a t e d i n t h e back o f t h e p a l a t e and t h r o a t , w h i l e h o m o c a p s a i c i n and h o m o d i h y d r o c a p s a i c i n t e n d e d t o p r o d u c e p r o l o n g e d pungent s e n s a t i o n s o f l o w i n t e n s i t y l o c a t e d i n t h e mid-mouth and m i d - p a l a t e

In Food Taste Chemistry; Boudreau, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1979.

3.

GOviNDARAjAN

57

Pungency

Downloaded by UNIV OF MONTANA on December 14, 2014 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: December 14, 1979 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1979-0115.ch003

regions. They hav/e a l s o f o u n d t h a t t h e s e e f f e c t s a r e p r o b a b l y r e l a t e d t o t h e s o l u b i l i t y o f t h e s e components i n p o l a r s o l v e n t s , h i g h e r f o r t h e f i r s t t h r e e components and l o w e r f o r t h e l a t t e r two homologs w i t h l o n g e r a l k y l s i d e - c h a i n s . I t a p p e a r s t o be c l e a r t h a t , i n common w i t h o t h e r g u s t a t o r y a t t r i b u t e s , t h e r e a r e no q u a l i t y d i f f e r e n c e s i n p u n g e n c y , and t h a t t h e p e r c e i v e d d i f f e r e n c e s a r e e x p l a i n e d by i n t r i n s i c i n t e n s i t y , c o n c e n t r a t i o n , and s o l u b i l i t y o f t h e d i f f e r e n t s t i m u l i r e s p o n s i b l e f o r pungency. As m e n t i o n e d e a r l i e r , i n any f o o d s i t u a t i o n , t h e i n t e r a c t i o n of other sensory m o d a l i t i e s could r e s u l t i n seemingly a p p a r e n t v a r i a t i o n s i n pungency q u a l i t y o f d i f f e r e n t s t i m u l i , b u t such d i f f e r e n c e s a r e not r e a l . We have c a r e f u l l y l o o k e d i n t o t h i s a s p e c t by c o m p a r i s o n o f i s o l a t e d , p u r e , t o t a l p u n g e n t components ( f r e e from aroma) o f t h e s p i c e s , c h i l l i e s , p e p p e r , and g i n g e r . A t c o n c e n t r a t i o n s s l i g h t l y above t h e i r i n d i v i d u a l t h r e s h o l d s , t h e d i f f e r e n t , p u r e s t i m u l i a r e i n d i s t i n g u i s h a b l e f r o m one a n o t h e r even by t r a i n e d p a n e l i s t s . A t h i g h e r l e v e l s , some d i s t i n c t i o n s c o u l d be made; e.g. q u i c k and s t r o n g f o r c a p s a i c i n o i d s , 'low' f o r g i n g e r o l , s l o w f o r s h o g a o l , and ' s l o w and l a s t i n g ' f o r p i p e r i n e . These d i f f e r e n c e s c o u l d , however, be r e l a t e d t o t h e i r known i n t r i n s i c , i n t e n s i t y d i f f e r e n c e s and s o l u b i l i t i e s i n w a t e r . I t would be p r e f e r a b l e t o measure t h e i r s o l u b i l i t y i n s a l i v a , and a l s o t o f i n d o u t whether t h e r e a r e d i f f e r e n c e s i n t h e i r r a t e s o f p e n e t r a t i o n t o t h e receptors. 1

1

I t was e a r l y r e c o g n i s e d t h a t pungency e v a l u a t i o n needs t o be done a s a d i l u t i o n method. S c o v i l l e ( l l ) , a s e a r l y as 1912, determined t h e pungency o f c a p s i c u m by d e t e r m i n i n g t h e g r e a t e s t d i l u t i o n a t w h i c h t h e d e f i n i t e p e r c e p t i o n o f ' b i t e ' ( p u n g e n c y ) would be r e c o g n i s e d ( t h e r e c o g n i t i o n t h r e s h o l d ) , and e x p r e s s e d i t as t h e r e c i p r o c a l of the d i l u t i o n . T h i s f i g u r e h a s s i n c e been c a l l e d t h e S c o v i l l e h e a t u n i t s . Though a p p a r e n t l y s i m p l e , s e v e r a l f a c t o r s i n t e r f e r e i n t h i s s u b j e c t i v e judgement. F o r example, v a r i a t i o n i n a c u i t y o f p a n e l i s t s ; aroma l o w e r i n g t h e t h r e s h o l d s and t h e r e b y b i a s i n g t h e judgement t o h i g h e r v a l u e s t h a n t h e r e a l ; c a r r y - o v e r o f pungency and a d a p t a t i o n e f f e c t b i a s i n g judgement o f s u b s e q u e n t samples t o lower v a l u e s ; other p s y c h o l o g i c a l a n t i c i p a t o r y e r r o r s now r e c o g n i s e d i n s e n s o r y t e s t i n g ; n o n - s t a n d a r d i s a t i o n o f p r o c e d u r e s and p r e p a r a t i o n o f s a m p l e s f o r d i l u t i o n t e s t i n g ; and l a c k o f p u r e r e f e r e n c e compounds had a l l c o n t r i b u t e d t o p o o r r e p r o d u c i b i l i t y and r e s u l t a n t s c e p t i c i s m a b o u t t h e v a l i d i t y o f t h e t e s t . With t h e s t a n d a r d i s a t i o n of t h r e s h o l d t e s t s g e n e r a l l y f o r other t a s t e and aroma s t i m u l i , pungency t e s t i n g has a l s o i m p r o v e d , and we c a n now g e t r e l i a b l e and r e p r o d u c i b l e measurements o f pungency. S t a n d a r d methods f o r e v a l u a t i o n

o f pungency:

The A m e r i c a n S p i c e T r a d e A s s o c i a t i o n (ASTA) ( 1 2 ) , a d o p t e d , i n 1968, an o f f i c i a l method ( 2 1 . 0 ) f o r pungency e v a l u a t i o n f o r c a p s i c u m , w h i c h a p p e a r s t o be an a d a p t a t i o n o f p r o c e d u r e s t h e n i n u s e by some f l a v o u r h o u s e s . T h e s e methods were p r o b a b l y d e v e l o p e d a s a r o u t i n e q u a l i t y c o n t r o l p r o c e d u r e , on s a m p l e s o b t a i n e d u s u a l l y

In Food Taste Chemistry; Boudreau, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1979.

58

FOOD TASTE CHEMISTRY

f r o m p a r t i c u l a r s o u r c e s , t o c h e c k whether t h e u s u a l l e v / e l o f p u n ­ gency was b e i n g m a i n t a i n e d ; t h e y depended on s e r i a l d i l u t i o n a r o u n d t h e e x p e c t e d v/alue, and a c c e p t i n g t h e l e v / e l a t w h i c h t h r e e o u t o f f i v e , t r a i n e d , i n - h o u s e p a n e l i s t s f o u n d pungency. The ASTA p r o ­ c e d u r e i m p r o v e d on t h i s by m e n t i o n i n g t h a t t h e t e s t s h o u l d be p e r ­ f o r m e d as a t h r e s h o l d t e s t and t h a t c a r r y - o v e r e f f e c t s s h o u l d be a v o i d e d by p a l a t e c l e a r i n g and a l l o w i n g t i m e between s a m p l e s ; a d i l u t i o n t a b l e t o c o v e r a wide r a n g e o f S c o v i l l e v a l u e s from 100 t o 15 χ 1 0 , e x p e c t e d f o r c h i l l i and i t s o l e o r e s i n s was a l s o p r o ­ vided. However, t h e method gave no r e c o m m e n d a t i o n on c o n c e n t ­ r a t i o n d i f f e r e n c e s i n t h e d i l u t i o n s e r i e s , and r e t a i n e d t h e s i n g l e f i g u r e v a l u e a g r e e d upon by t h r e e o u t o f f i v e j u d g e s . The p r o ­ c e s s i n g and t r e a t m e n t o f d a t a a r e n o t s t a t i s t i c a l l y acceptable, n o r u s e f u l f o r c o r r e l a t i v e work w i t h c h e m i c a l methods o f e s t i m a ­ t i o n s of the s t i m u l i . These a r e p r o b a b l y t h e r e a s o n s f o r t h e p o o r r e p r o d u c i b i l i t y o f t h e method r e c e n t l y r e p o r t e d ( 1 0 ) . This pro­ c e d u r e h a s , h o w e v e r , been a d o p t e d by t h e B r i t i s h and by t h e I n ­ t e r n a t i o n a l Standards Organisation.

Downloaded by UNIV OF MONTANA on December 14, 2014 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: December 14, 1979 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1979-0115.ch003

5

A l l t h e s e a s p e c t s have been r e c e n t l y s t u d i e d i n two p u b l i ­ c a t i o n s ( 1 0 , 1 3 ) , w h i c h s t a n d a r d i z e d t h e d i l u t i o n t e s t f o r pungency and c l e a r l y e s t a b l i s h e d c o r r e l a t i o n s w i t h t h e e s t i m a t e s o f t o t a l , and even i n d i v i d u a l , c a p s a i c i n o i d s . These p a p e r s a l s o r e v i e w t h e e a r l i e r attempts a t s t a n d a r d i s a t i o n . Two a p p r o a c h e s a r e p o s s i b l e : use o f a f a i r l y homogenous p a n e l t o d e t e r m i n e t h e t h r e s h o l d p u n ­ gency r e s p o n s e due t o t h e s t i m u l i ; o r u s e o f a g e n e r a l p a n e l t o determine the average t h r e s h o l d of the panel f o r t h e s t i m u l i . The s e c o n d v a l u e w i l l have w i d e r a p p l i c a b i l i t y i n u s e s i t u a t i o n s ; b u t t h e f i r s t v a l u e s h o u l d be u s e f u l f o r c o r r e l a t i v e work. The two methods a p p r o a c h one a n o t h e r when p a n e l s a r e s c r e e n e d and t r a i n e d t o a v o i d a l l b i a s f a c t o r s , and when c a r e f u l l y p l a n n e d d i l u t i o n l e v e l s , d e t a i l s o f p a n e l p r o c e d u r e , t r e a t m e n t o f d a t a , and e x ­ p r e s s i o n of r e s u l t s a r e adopted. I n fact', t h e r e s u l t s p u b l i s h e d i n t h e two i n d e p e n d e n t s t u d i e s ( 1 0 , 1 3 ) , show c l o s e v a l u e s , 17+0.9 m i l l i o n f o r n a t u r a l c a p s a i c i n o i d s and 16.1+0.6 m i l l i o n f o r p u r e c a p s a i c i n and d i h y d r o c a p s a i c i n . The method s t a n d a r d i z e d i n o u r l a b o r a t o r y c a n be summarised by t h e f o l l o w i n g s t e p s , each o f w h i c h s i g n i f i c a n t l y i m p r o v e s r e ­ p r o d u c i b i l i t y and p r e c i s i o n . i ) P r e p a r a t i o n o f sample and p r e l i m i n a r y t e s t i n g , when judges a r e f a m i l i a r i s e d w i t h t h e r e c o g n i t i o n o f pun­ gency b i a s f a c t o r s , t h e t e s t p r o c e d u r e , and t h e e v a l ­ uation card. The d a t a are u s e d t o group t h e j u d g e s i n t o homogenous p a n e l s o f h i g h and l o w s e n s i t i v i t y u s i n g t h e g r o u p mean and i n d i v i d u a l t h r e s h o l d s , and t o f i x t h e a p p r o x i m a t e t h r e s h o l d f o r each p a n e l . ii)

F i n a l e v a l u a t i o n of t h e sample through t h e use of a d i l u t i o n s e r i e s , i m p o r t a n t l y , an a r i t h e m a t i c s e r i e s with s m a l l increments i n c o n c e n t r a t i o n around t h e

In Food Taste Chemistry; Boudreau, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1979.

3.

GOviNDARAjAN

Pungency

59

a p p r o x i m a t e t h r e s h o l d , m a i n t a i n i n g one ' j n d ' w h i c h has been n o r m a l l y f o u n d t o be o n e - t e n t h o f t h e t h r e s h o l d c o n c e n t r a t i o n - and o b t a i n i n g 15-20 j u d g e m e n t s w i t h a minimum o f 5 p a n e l i s t s and o f 3 to 4 repeat t e s t s . iii)

Judgements a r e decoded i n t e r m s o f S c o v i l l e u n i t s (SU = r e c i p r o c a l o f d i l u t i o n s ) and t h e mean v a l u e i s e x p r e s s e d as a r a n g e , i n SU + cr.

Downloaded by UNIV OF MONTANA on December 14, 2014 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: December 14, 1979 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1979-0115.ch003

i v ) The p a n e l i s d e f i n e d by i t s a v e r a g e t h r e s h o l d i n SU + 6-

2

?

8

9

CH == C H - ( C H ) 2

*

2

8

undecenamide

- R e l a t i v e t o n a t u r a l c a p s a i c i n a s 100. D a t a f r o m

(10,24)

W i t h t h i s a s b a c k g r o u n d , we c o u l d d e c i d e on methods o f e s t i m a t i o n o f c a p s a i c i n o i d s i n c a p s i c u m by i n s t r u m e n t a l methods. Many m e t h o d s , u t i l i s i n g p a r t i t i o n , c o l u m n , p a p e r , and t h i n - l a y e r c h r o m a t o g r a p h i c s e p a r a t i o n s , combined w i t h c o l o r i m e t r y and gas c h r o m a t o g r a p h y , have been s u g g e s t e d f o r e s t i m a t i o n o f t^he c a p s a i c i n oids (26). A l l t h e s e e a r l i e r methods g i v e e s t i m a t e s o f t h e t o t a l c a p s a i c i n o i d s ; b u t t h e r e c e n t g a s c h r o m a t o g r a p h i c method a f t e r s i l y l a t i o n i s c a p a b l e o f s e p a r a t i n g and e s t i m a t i n g t h e i n d i v i d u a l n a t u r a l c a p s a i c i n o i d s and some o f t h e s y n t h e t i c s ( 1 0 ) . For r o u t i n e q u a l i t y e v a l u a t i o n , i t i s c o n s i d e r e d s u f f i c i e n t t o d e t e r m i n e a c c u r a t e l y t h e t o t a l c a p s a i c i n o i d s ; t h e m i n o r compon-^ e n t s g e n e r a l l y amount t o a b o u t 1 0 $ , and have 50 t o 60$ o f t h e p u n gency r e s p o n s e o f t h e m a j o r c a p s a i c i n o i d s . For t h i s purpose S a l z a r (26) compared a number o f t h e e a r l i e r methods, and f o u n d t h e p a p e r c h r o m a t o g r a p h i c method (27) t o be s i m p l e , r a p i d , r e p r o d u c i b l e and a c c u r a t e . The method i s a p p l i c a b l e d i r e c t l y t o t h e o l e o r e s i n , and i s b a s e d on t h e f a c t t h a t , o f t h e t h r e e major compone n t s o f a t o t a l e x t r a c t , t h e c a p s i c u m c o l o r would be a d s o r b e d by t h e p a p e r and a l o n g w i t h t h e f a t would be moved l i t t l e by t h e b u f f e r e d methanol s o l v e n t , while t h e c a p s a i c i n o i d s a r e c l e a r l y s e p a r a t e d , moving t o a h i g h R f p o s i t i o n ( F i g u r e l ) . The a c c u r a c y o f t h e d e t e r m i n a t i o n was a l s o i m p r o v e d by t h e u s e o f t h e more s e n s i t i v e and s p e c i f i c G i b b s r e a g e n t f o r t h e c o l o r i m e t r y . 1

However, capsaicinoids there a r e high when t h e r e i s

t h e v a l u e s by any o f t h e s e methods m e a s u r i n g t o t a l would g i v e a l o w c o r r e l a t i o n w i t h pungency^ when p r o p o r t i o n s o f t h e C8 and C i o c a p s a i c i n o i d s , o r g r o s s a d u l t e r a t i o n w i t h s y n t h e t i c s . The d e t e c t i o n

In Food Taste Chemistry; Boudreau, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1979.

64

FOOD TASTE CHEMISTRY

Downloaded by UNIV OF MONTANA on December 14, 2014 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: December 14, 1979 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1979-0115.ch003

o f a d u l t e r a t i o n by s y n t h e t i c s has been a t t e m p t e d s i n c e 1955, but a l l t h e methods were r a t h e r c o m p l e x , and s o , u n s a t i s f a c t o r y f o r r a p i d and r o u t i n e s c r e e n i n g . R e c e n t l y , Todd _et al_ (28) have d e v e l oped e l e g a n t , r a p i d , t h i n - l a y e r c h r o m a t o g r a p h i c methods f o r s e p a r a t i o n o f c a p s a i c i n o i d s and s y n t h e t i c s by u t i l i z i n g t h e d i f f e r e n c e i n s o l u b i l i t y between the d i f f e r e n t c a p s a i c i n o i d s as t h e c h a i n l e n g t h i n c r e a s e d , and by s w i t c h i n g t o p a r t i t i o n c h r o m a t o g r a p h y i n the r e v e r s e d phase, with s i l v e r — i o n complexing, to separate the s a t u r a t e d and u n s a t u r a t e d compounds. A s e p a r a t i o n o f t h e f i v e s y n t h e t i c s from t h e n a t u r a l c a p s a i c i n o i d s as a l s o t h e f i v e n a t u r a l c a p s a i c i n o i d s i n t o t h r e e s p o t s was a c h i e v e d i n t h e f i r s t d i r e c t i o n . T a b l e IV.

C a p s a i c i n o i d s and r e l a t e d s y n t h e t i c compounds - T h i n l a y e r c h r o m a t o g r a p h y , R values P

Reversed Phase

Polyamide Methanol ( A g ) / water/acetic acid +

Compounds

Methanol/water 60:40 ( v / v ) As

Vanillyl

octanamide

Vanillyl namide

such

0.70

Brominated

0.70

Methanol (Ag )/ water/acet i c acid 52:40:8 ( v / v ) +



52:40:8



pelargo0.64

0.64

Capsaicin

0.52

0.65

0.39

0.64

Nordihydrocapsaicin

0.52

0.52

0.25

0.42

Vanillyl

capramide

0.44

0.44





0.32

Dihydrocapsaicin

0.41

0.41

0.17

Homocapsaicin

0.41

0.63

0.30

0.57

V a n i l l y l undecenamide

0.36

0.25

Homodihydrocapsaicin

0.31

0.31

0.10

0.26

V a n i l l y l undecanamide

0.20

0.20





Data from

(28).

In Food Taste Chemistry; Boudreau, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1979.

(v/v)

Downloaded by UNIV OF MONTANA on December 14, 2014 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: December 14, 1979 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1979-0115.ch003

3.

GoviNDARAjAN

Pungency

65

B r o m i n a t i o n o f t h e s e p a r a t e d s p o t s by e x p o s u r e t o b r o m i n e v/apor i n a t a n k , and f u r t h e r d e v e l o p m e n t i n t h e s e c o n d d i r e c t i o n a c h i e v e d t h e s e p a r a t i o n o f t h e bunched u n s a t u r a t e d from t h e s a t u r a t e d n a t u r ­ a l components w i t h one m e t h y l e n e g r o u p l e s s . The n a t u r a l , s a t u r ­ a t e d and u n s a t u r a t e d c a p s a i c i n o i d s c o u l d be c l e a r l y s e p a r a t e d i n a s i n g l e d e v e l o p m e n t , and more r a p i d l y by t h e use o f r e v e r s e d p h a s e , o r p o l y a m i d e , p l a t e s , and u s i n g d e v e l o p i n g s o l v e n t s w i t h s i l v e r i o n f o r c o m p l e x i n g . The s e p a r a t i o n p o s s i b i l i t i e s a r e c l e a r f r o m t h e R f v a l u e s f o r t h e d i f f e r e n t s y s t e m s g i v e n i n T a b l e IV. T h e s e methods a r e a p p l i c a b l e t o t h e e x t r a c t s or d i l u t e d o l e o r e s i n s d i r e c t l y , not r e q u i r i n g any p r e - s e p a r a t i o n ; h e n c e , t h e y a r e u s e ­ f u l f o r r a p i d s c r e e n i n g i n the f i e l d f o r d e t e c t i o n of a d u l t e r ­ a t i o n , o r f o r s e l e c t i o n o f i m p r o v e d s t r a i n s i n a g r o n o m i c and g e n e ­ t i c work. The e s t i m a t i o n o f i n d i v i d u a l components and d i f f e r e n t s y n t h e ­ t i c s was e f f e c t i v e l y a c h i e v e d by gas c h r o m a t o g r a p h y a f t e r s i m p l e s i l y l a t i o n (10). F i g u r e 2 shows t h e s e p a r a t i o n o b t a i n e d , c l e a r l y away f r o m o t h e r v o l a t i l e s i n a c a p s i c u m e x t r a c t . The i n d i v i d u a l c a p s a i c i n o i d s were q u a n t i t a t e d i n r e l a t i o n t o v a n i l l y l o c t a n a m i d e as t h e i n t e r n a l s t a n d a r d c h o s e n , b e c a u s e i t e l u t e d j u s t p r i o r t o t h e c a p s a i c i n o i d s and t h e r e s p o n s e f a c t o r s o f t h e c a p s a i c i n o i d s w i t h r e f e r e n c e t o t h i s s t a n d a r d were c l o s e t o u n i t y . The stand­ a r d i s e d c o n d i t i o n s were as f o l l o w s : S i l y l a t i o n w i t h N , 0 - b i s ( t r i m e t h y l s i l y l ) - t r i f l u o r o a c e t a m i d e i n t e t r a h y d r o f u r a n gave c l e a r r a p i d r e a c t i o n a t room t e m p e r a t u r e . The s i l y l a t e d e x t r a c t s were i n j e c t e d d i r e c t l y on t o a s t a i n l e s s s t e e l column o f 2 m χ 3 mm, f i l l e d w i t h Z% SE-30 on Chromosorb-GHP, (100-120 mesh); t h e c o l u m n t e m p e r a t u r e was programmed f r o m 170° t o 215°C a t 4°/min. and h e l d a t 215°C f o r 10 m i n u t e s . The i n j e c t i o n p o r t t e m p e r a t u r e was i m p o r t a n t f o r r a p i d v o l a t i l i s a t i o n o f a l l t h e components w i t h ­ out d e c o m p o s i t i o n , and was f i x e d a t 200°C. The f l a m e i o n i s a t i o n d e t e c t o r t e m p e r a t u r e was k e p t a t 250°C, and n i t r o g e n f l o w a t 20 m l / m i n . The p e r c e n t a g e s o f t h e i n d i v i d u a l c a p s a i c i n o i d s were c a l c u l a t e d from t h e a r e a s o f t h e p e a k s , t h e r e s p o n s e f a c t o r s , and t h e w e i g h t and a r e a of t h e r e f e r e n c e compound. P u n g e n c i e s of s a m p l e s were c a l c u l a t e d b y m u l t i p l y i n g t h e p e r ­ c e n t a g e s of i n d i v i d u a l c a p s a i c i n o i d s from gas c h r o m a t o g r a p h y w i t h t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g t h r e s h o l d p u n g e n c y , and t h e t o t a l was e x p r e s s e d i n S c o v i l l e u n i t s . Figure 3 i l l u s t r a t e s the c l o s e r e l a t i o n b e t ­ ween t h e pungency c a l c u l a t e d from t h e gas c h r o m a t o g r a p h i c compo­ s i t i o n and t h e d i r e c t l y ( s e n s o r i l y ) e s t i m a t e d v a l u e of pungency. A c o r r e l a t i o n c o e f f i c i e n t g r e a t e r t h a n 0.95 was o b t a i n e d f o r p u n ­ gency v a l u e s v a r y i n g from 50 ΓΊ t o 2.0 MH. I t i s , t h e r e f o r e , c l e a r l y p o s s i b l e t o e v a l u a t e by i n s t r u ­ m e n t a l methods t h e q u a n t i t y of s y n t h e t i c s p r e s e n t as a d u l t e r a n t s i n a sample o f c a p s i c u m e x t r a c t or o l e o r e s i n , t o d e t e r m i n e i n d i ­ v i d u a l c a p s a i c i n o i d s or t o t a l c a p s a i c i n o i d s , and t o p r e d i c t t h e pungency of t h e c a p s i c u m p r e p a r a t i o n s .

In Food Taste Chemistry; Boudreau, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1979.

66

FOOD TASTE CHEMISTRY

Downloaded by UNIV OF MONTANA on December 14, 2014 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: December 14, 1979 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1979-0115.ch003

Cp

Wmnmnmnr

1

2

3

4

Figure 1. Tracings of separation of total capsaicinoids of capsicum extracts and reference pure compounds by paper chromatography: Spot (I) red capsicum; Spot (2) natural capsaicinoids pure; Spot (3) green capsicum fresh; and Spot (4) synthetic capsaicin; (C) color; (F) fat, and (Cp), capsaicinoids/capsaicin ((27) and unpublished).

Journal of Food Science

Figure 2. GC pattern of silylated capsicum extract (See text for GC conditions and Tables II and III for abbreviations) (10)

In Food Taste Chemistry; Boudreau, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1979.

3.

GOviNDARAjAN

67

Pungency

Pepper ( P i p e r nigrum

Linn.)

Pungency i s t h e q u a l i t y w h i c h has made p e p p e r w o r l d famous as t h e K i n g o f S p i c e s ; i t i s g i v e n an even g r e a t e r w e i g h t a g e t h a n a r o ma when d e t e r m i n i n g t h e o v e r a l l q u a l i t y o f p e p p e r .

Downloaded by UNIV OF MONTANA on December 14, 2014 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: December 14, 1979 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1979-0115.ch003

The c h e m i s t r y o f t h e p u n g e n t compounds of p e p p e r has been u n d e r s t u d y s i n c e t h e i s o l a t i o n o f p i p e r i n e i n 182Q. P i p e r i n e was shown t o be a p i p e r i d i d e o f p i p e r i c a c i d , and had t h e t r a n s , t r a n s configuration. The t h r e e o t h e r p o s s i b l e i s o m e r s were soon p o s t u l a t e d , and t h e y were named i s o p i p e r i n e ( c i s , t r a n s ) , i s o c h a v i c i n e ( t r a n s , c i s ) and c h a v i c i n e ( c i s , c i s ) even b e f o r e t h e y were s y n t h e sized. The a s s i g n m e n t o f t h e i s o m e r i c c o n f i g u r a t i o n s t a r t s f r o m t h e a m i d e end. T h e r e was much c o n t r o v e r s y a b o u t t h e i d e n t i t y of t h e h i g h l y p u n g e n t compound i n t h e mother l i q u o r , a f t e r c r y s t a l l i s a t i o n o f p i p e r i n e from p e p p e r e x t r a c t s . B u c h e i m s c l a i m s o f t h i s compound b e i n g t h e c i s - c i s i s o m e r and b e i n g more pungent t h a n p i p e r i n e were b e l i e v e d f o r a l o n g t i m e , even t h o u g h i t was c l e a r l y shown t h a t p i p e r i n e was not pungent i n t h e c r y s t a l l i n e s t a t e , b u t , was ext r e m e l y pungent as a s o l u t i o n i n a l c o h o l . The e a r l y s t u d i e s a r e r e p o r t e d i n d e t a i l i n a r e c e n t r e v i e w which a l s o g i v e s a comprehensive bibliography (16). 1

Grewe et_ a l _ (29) s y n t h e s i s e d t h e f o u r p o s s i b l e i s o m e r i c a c i d s by s t e r e o s p e c i f i c r o u t e s , as a l s o t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g p i p e r i d i d e s , and d e t e r m i n e d t h e i r s p e c t r a l and o t h e r p h y s i c a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s . T h i s c l e a r e d t h e c o n f u s i o n i n e a r l i e r works on t h e s u p p o s e d i s o l a t i o n o f c h a v i c i n i c a c i d s f r o m p e p p e r . They a l s o d e t e r m i n e d t h e i r pungency and showed t h a t , e x c e p t i n g p i p e r i n e , 5 ( 3 , 4 - d i o x y m e t h y l e n e phenyl)-2-trans,4-trans-pentadienoic a c i d , a l l other isomers are p o o r l y p u n g e n t . They c o n c l u d e d t h a t n e i t h e r c h a v i c i n e nor t h e o t h e r two, c i s - t r a n s or t r a n s - c i s , i s o m e r s e x i s t i n n a t u r a l p e p p e r . They a l s o showed t h a t most of t h e i s o m e r s were u n s t a b l e t o l i g h t and were e a s i l y c o n v e r t e d i n t o t h e t r a n s , t r a n s p i p e r i n e . D e C l e y n and V e r z e l e ( 3 g , 3 1 , i Z ) i s o l a t e d t h e f o u r p o s s i b l e i s o m e r s from p i p e r i n i c a c i d i r r a d i a t e d i n an u l t r a - v i o l e t r e a c t o r , by c o u n t e r - c u r r e n t d i s t r i b u t i o n ; and a l s o t h e p i p e r i d i d e s o b t a i n e d s y n t h e t i c a l l y f r o m t h e t r e a t e d p i p e r i n i c a c i d by h i g h pressure l i q u i d c h r o m a t o g r a p h y ( F i g u r e 4 ) . The s t r u c t u r e s o f t h e i s o m e r s were d e r i v e d m a i n l y from NMR d a t a . T h e i r pungency was r e c o r d e d , but p o s s i b l y not by r i g o r o u s methods ( 3 1 , 3 2 ) . The r e s u l t s c o n f i r m e d t h e o b s e r v a t i o n o f Grewe _e_t SLL (29) t h a t p i p e r i n e i s t h e pungent p r i n c i p l e o f p e p p e r , and t h a t o t h e r i s o m e r s have l i t t l e ' t a s t e . The d a t a on t h e p r o p e r t i e s o f t h e i s o m e r s a r e c o l l e c t e d i n T a b l e V. 1

D e C l e y n and V e r z e l e had o r i g i n a l l y (30) h e l d t h e v i e w t h a t t h e l o s s o f pungency i n p e p p e r on s t o r a g e i s p o s s i b l y due t o l i g h t i n d u c e d i s o m e r i s a t i o n o f a p a r t of the p i p e r i n e t o t h e o t h e r i s o mers w h i c h a r e not p u n g e n t . B u t , i n t h e i r l a t e s t work ( 3 3 ) , t h e y f i n d l i t t l e e v i d e n c e o f t h e p r e s e n c e o f i s o m e r s i n pepper s a m p l e s

In Food Taste Chemistry; Boudreau, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1979.

Downloaded by UNIV OF MONTANA on December 14, 2014 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: December 14, 1979 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1979-0115.ch003

68 FOOD TASTE CHEMISTRY

In Food Taste Chemistry; Boudreau, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1979.

3.

GoviNDARAjAN T a b l e \l.

General

Pungency

69

P i p e r i n e and i s o m e r s and t h e i r

properties

Formula:5 4 3 2 1 /—> n- ^ i-CH=CH-CH=CH-CO-N > VNk

«