Subscriber access provided by University of Sunderland
Biofuels and Biobased Materials
Formation and stability of core-shell nanofibers by electrospinning of gel-like corn oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by gelatin Cen Zhang, and Hui Zhang J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b04270 • Publication Date (Web): 08 Oct 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on October 9, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Formation and stability of core-shell nanofibers by electrospinning of
2
gel-like corn oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by gelatin
3
Cen Zhang a, Hui Zhang a,*
4
a
5
National Engineering Laboratory of Intelligent Food Technology and Equipment,
6
Key Laboratory for Agro-Products Postharvest Handling of Ministry of Agriculture,
7
Key Laboratory for Agro-Products Nutritional Evaluation of Ministry of Agriculture,
8
Zhejiang Key Laboratory for Agro-Food Processing, Fuli Institute of Food Science,
9
College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University,
10
Hangzhou 310058, China
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
__________________________
22
*
23
Corresponding author. Tel.: +86-571-88982981; fax: +86-571-88982981. E–mail address:
[email protected] 24
1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
25
ABSTRACT: The core-shell nanofibers were fabricated by electrospinning of
26
gel-like corn oil emulsions stabilized by gelatin. The oil-in-water (O/W) emulsions
27
satisfied the Herschel-Bulkley rheological model and showed shear-thinning and
28
predominantly elastic gel behaviours. The increasing oil fractions (φ) ranging from 0
29
to 0.6 remarkably increased the apparent viscosity, and then led to an increase in the
30
average diameter and encapsulation efficiency of electrospun fibers. The core-shell
31
structured fibers by emulsion electrospinning were observed in transmission electron
32
microscopy (TEM) images. The encapsulated oil was found to randomly distribute as
33
core, especially inside the beads. The binding of corn oil to gelatin was mainly driven
34
by the non-covalent forces. These core-shell fibers at various φ values (φ = 0.2, 0.4,
35
0.6 and 0.8) showed a high thermal decomposition stability upon heating to 250 °C,
36
and the denaturation temperature were 85.32, 77.97, 82.99 and 87.25 °C, respectively.
37
The corn oil encapsulated in emulsion-based fiber mats had good storage stability
38
during 5 days. These results contributed to a good understanding on emulsion
39
electrospinning of food materials for potential applications in bioactive encapsulation,
40
enzyme immobilization and active food packaging.
41
KEYWORDS: Gelatin; Corn oil; Gel-like emulsions; Emulsion electrospinning;
42
Core-shell nanofibers
43
44 2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 39
Page 3 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
45
INTRODUCTION
46
Electrospinning, as a simple and promising technique, has been used to fabricate
47
micro- and nanofibers from a variety of polymers. During the electrospinning process,
48
a polymer jet was charged and ejected in a high-voltage power system. The
49
continuous fibers were obtained along with the evaporation of the solvent.1 Various
50
structural advantages of the electrospun fibers (e.g., ultrafine fibrous structures, high
51
surface area to volume ratio, high porosity, etc.) have good application potentials in
52
food, cosmetics, pharmaceutical and biomedical industries.2 Currently, the
53
electrospinning technique used to develop a controlled-release delivery are blending,
54
coaxial or emulsion electrospinning, etc.,3,4,5 thus resulting in nanofibers with various
55
shapes, including uniform, beaded and flat/ribbon fibers.6 Although the application of
56
the blending electrospinning technique allowed the fabrication of polymer fibers
57
loaded with bioactive compounds (e.g., vitamins, coumarins, and flavonoids), the
58
bioactive compounds have to be dissolved or dispersed (if insoluble) in the solution
59
prior to electrospinning. Then, the distribution of bioactive compounds inside the
60
fibers is highly determined by the physicochemical properties of the solution and the
61
interactions between the compounds and solution.7 Additionally, sensitive bioactive
62
compounds (e.g., peptide, enzymes, and cytokines) may compromise their bioactivity
63
due to the possible denaturation in the solvents. Coaxial and emulsion electrospinning
64
are both available to fabricate core-shell structured fibers. Compared to coaxial
65
electrospinning, emulsion electrospinning can be easily accomplished using only a
66
single nozzle, and there is no need to precisely control the process variables (e.g., 3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
67
interfacial tension, feed rate, viscoelasticity of the two polymers). Therefore, emulsion
68
electrospinning can provide a simpler approach to decrease the burst release of
69
bioactive compounds inside the fibers.
70
Core-shell nanofibers can be produced directly by electrospinning of either the
71
oil-in-water (O/W) or water-in-oil (W/O) emulsions, which help to preserve the
72
activity and bioavailability of encapsulated compounds. Cai et al. found that the
73
electrospun Van/OA-MIONs-PLA nanofibers made from W/O Pickering emulsions
74
possessed desirable mechanical and antibacterial properties.8 On the other hand, the
75
nanofibers by electrospinning of O/W emulsions have been also developed as a
76
delivery vehicle of hydrophobic compounds. Shin and Lee loaded phytoncide into an
77
O/W emulsions stabilized by Tween 80, and then fabricated phytoncide/poly(vinyl
78
alcohol) nanofibers by emulsion electrospinning. The obtained nanofibers had a
79
core-shell structure and showed a sustained manner over 14 days as well as strong
80
antimicrobial effects.9 To date, Tween 20 and Brij O10 have been small molecular
81
surfactants commonly used in emulsion electrospinning.10,11 However, the toxicity
82
and biodegradation of the surfactants can not be neglected, and the side bulging and
83
rough morphology of nanofibers may be caused by the migration of some of the
84
surfactants from the oil-water interface to the nanofiber surface during the
85
electrospinning process.12
86
Although many studies have focused on the fabrication of nanofibers by
87
electrospinning of O/W emulsions, no report is available on gelatin used as
88
emulsifying agents in emulsion electrospinning, in which gelatin could enhance the 4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 39
Page 5 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
89
viscosity and stabilize O/W emulsions, independently of the surfactants used. As a
90
safe and economic material, gelatin has been widely used to enhance the stability,
91
elasticity and consistency of food products.13 Gelatin is also employed as emulsifiers
92
in the stabilization of O/W emulsions because it has amphiphilic characteristics due to
93
its amino acid composition. Additionally, gelatin can form time-dependent gel-like
94
stabilizing layers at the surface of emulsion droplets, which may modify rheology
95
properties to slow down the creaming process.14 The unique chemo-physical
96
properties of gelatin such as emulsifying property, surface tension as well as its
97
viscosity and conductivity contributed to the good spinnability.15 Recently, the
98
gelatin-based electrospun fibers have drawn much attention in the field of controlled
99
release of bioactive compounds due to its non-toxicity, biocompatibility and
100
biodegradability. Li et al. incorporated vitamin A and E into the nanofibers by
101
electrospinning of gelatin, with the aim of achieving their sustained release.16 Laha et
102
al. fabricated the crosslinked gelatin nanofibers as a carrier for hydrophobic drug
103
piperine,
104
controlled-release properties at varying pH conditions.17
and
these
electrospun
fibers
showed
good
compatibility
and
105
The aim of the current study was to fabricate core-shell structured fibers by
106
electrospinning of corn oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by gelatin, which were
107
expected to act as a carrier for hydrophobic compounds. The morphology of the
108
core-shell nanofibers was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM),
109
transmission electron microscope (TEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy
110
(CLSM). The thermal behavior and conformational changes of the nanofiber mats 5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
111
were evaluated using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential scanning
112
calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR). In addition, the rheology
113
and microstructure of the emulsions were characterized by rheological measurements
114
and optical microscopy.
115
MATERIALS AND METHODS
116
Materials. Gelatin (Type B, ~250 g Bloom, MW~100 kDa) from porcine skin and
117
Nile Red were purchased from Aladdin, Inc. (Shanghai, China). Corn oil was obtained
118
from a local supermarket. The other reagents obtained from Sinopharm Chemical
119
Reagent Co. (Shanghai, China) were of analytical reagent grade. All the reagents were
120
used without further processing, and the ultrapure water was used throughout the
121
experiments.
122
Preparation of the Oil-in-water (O/W) Emulsions. Initially, aqueous phases were
123
prepared by dissolving gelatin (25%, w/v) in 40% (v/v) acetic aqueous solution. Corn
124
oil was then added dropwise at the concentrations of 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 (v/v) with
125
respect to the gelatin solution during stirring. The mixed solutions were homogenized
126
using a high-speed homogenizer (IKA T18 digital ULTRA-TURRAX®, IKA GmbH,
127
Germany) at 6,000 rpm for 2 min, and subsequently the emulsions at various oil
128
fractions (φ = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8) were obtained by ultrasonic treatment (Model
129
KQ-250DE, Ultrasonic Corporation, Kunshan, China) at 250 W for 3 min at room
130
temperature (25 ± 5 °C).
131
Optical microscopy. Optical microscopy images of the emulsions were recorded 6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 39
Page 7 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
132
using a Leica ICC50 W optical microscope (Carl Zeiss, German) equipped with a
133
built-in camera. An aliquot of sample was deposited on a microscope slide, and then
134
photographed using a 40× objective lens and 10× eyepiece.
135
Steady Shear Viscosities. Steady shear viscosities of the emulsions at different φ
136
values were measured using a rotational rheometer (MCR 302, Anton Paar, Graz,
137
Austria) equipped with a circulating water bath at 25 °C. A plate/plate measuring setup
138
(PP50) was chosen, and the gap between two plates was set to 1.0 mm. the shear rate
139
was continuously ramped from 1 to 100 s−1.
140 141
The flow properties of the emulsions were evaluated using Herschel-Bulkley model: σ = σ0 + K·γn
142 143
where σ and σ0 denote the shear stress and the apparent yield stress, respectively. K is
144
the consistency index, which means apparent viscosity of the examined emulsions. γ
145
is the shear rate, and n represents the flow behavior index.
146
Viscoelastic Properties. Oscillatory frequency sweep experiments were performed
147
at 1% strain within the identified linear viscoelastic region to investigate the
148
viscoelastic properties of the gel-like emulsions. The frequency was oscillated from 1
149
to 100 rad s−1. The elastic modulus (G′) and loss modulus (G″) were recorded using
150
RheoCompass software.
151
Electrospinning Process. Electrospinning of the emulsions was performed in
152
horizontal alignment at an applied voltage of 15 kV and a tip-to-collector distance of
153
100 mm. The feed rate of syringe pump (LSP02-1B, Baoding Longer Precision Pump 7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
154
Co., Ltd., China) loaded with the spinning solution was set at 0.5 mL h−1. The
155
electrospun nanofibers were collected on a grounded cylindrical aluminium foil. The
156
temperature and humidity throughout the electrospinning were kept at 25 °C and
157
around 50%, respectively.
158
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). SEM (SU8010, Hitachi, Japan) was used
159
to observe the morphology of the electrospun fibers at an acceleration voltage of 3 kV.
160
The fiber diameters in the SEM images were measured using Nano Measure software
161
by randomly selecting 200 data points for each image.
162
Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM). TEM (JEM-1200EX, Jeol Ltd, Tokyo,
163
Japan) was applied to confirm the core-shell structure of nanofibers, which were
164
spread onto copper grid and observed at an accelerating voltage of 120 kV.
165
Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM). To confirm the distribution of
166
corn oil within the nanofibers, the electrospun fibers stained with Nile Red (0.01%
167
w/w solution) were directly collected on microscope glass slides. The analysis was
168
operated on CLSM (LSM780, Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Jena, Germany) using an EC
169
Plan-Neofluar 40×/1.30 oil immersion objective at an excitation wavelength of 488
170
nm.
171
FTIR Spectroscopy. A FTIR spectrometer (Nicolet 170-SX, Thermo Nicolet Ltd.,
172
USA) was used to record the infrared spectra of the nanofiber mats over the
173
wavenumber range of 400 - 4000 cm−1 with a resolution of 4 cm−1 and 32 scans.
174
Thermogravimetric Analysis. A TA-Q500 thermal gravimetric analyzer (TGA)
175
was applied to investigate the thermal degradation behavior of the nanofiber mats. 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 39
Page 9 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
176
Samples (ca. 8 mg) were heated from 50 to 600 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1
177
under nitrogen atmosphere.
178
DSC Measurements. The thermal properties of the electrospun fibers were
179
evaluated on DSC (DSC-1, Mettler-Toledo corp., Switzerland) under a nitrogen
180
atmosphere with a flow rate of 50 mL min−1. Samples were accurately weighed into
181
40 mL aluminum pans. Thermal scans were conducted in a temperature range from 25
182
to 250 °C with a scan rate of 10 °C min−1.
183
Measurements of Encapsulation Efficiency and Storage Stability. The
184
encapsulation efficiency of the electrospun mats were determined according to the
185
method reported previously with modifications.18 Corn oil was dissolved in
186
dichloromethane to prepare a series of standard solutions at different known
187
concentrations, and were scanned in the wavelength range of 200 - 600 nm
188
spectrophotometrically (SP-752 UV-visible spectrophotometer, Shanghai Spectrum
189
Instruments Co. Ltd., China). The maximum absorbance was determined at 290 nm,
190
and a standard curve of corn oil was obtained using a linear regression model. Then,
191
10 mg of each fiber sample was added to 10 mL dichloromethane under stirring (100
192
rpm) for 15 min. Subsequently, the suspensions were filtered through nylon syringe
193
filter with a 0.45 μm pore size. The absorbance of resulting solutions at 290 nm was
194
recorded. The blanks were the electrospun gelatin fibers without corn oil. The
195
concentration of corn oil on the fiber surface was calculated using the standard curve
196
(R2 = 0.9992). To investigate the storage stability of the encapsulated corn oil, the
197
electrospun mats were kept in open culture dishes at relative humidity ranging from 9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
198
30 to 40%, and the change in the absorbance at 290 nm was recorded at 2 days
199
interval. The encapsulation efficiency was determined by the following equation:
200
Encapsulation efficiency (%) = (Wi − Ws)/ Wi × 100
201
where Wi and Ws denote the initial weight of corn oil added for encapsulation and the
202
weight of corn oil on fiber surface calculated according to the standard curve,
203
respectively.
204
Statistical Analysis. All the measurements were carried out in triplicate. Data were
205
analyzed using Origin 8.0 and expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
206
One-way ANOVA was performed to determine the statistically significance at p
0.99) (Table 1). According to the
227
parameters obtained by Herschel-Bulkley model, the non-linear relationship between
228
shear stress and shear rate of the gelatin-stabilized O/W emulsions at various oil
229
fractions demonstrated the shear-thinning behavior of the emulsions as a
230
non-Newtonian fluid, which may be caused by breaking the network of entangled
231
polymers during shearing. Then, the speed of disrupting intermolecular entanglement
232
was faster than that of reformation, leading to lower apparent viscosity and less
233
intermolecular resistance to flow.23 The σ0 was an indicator of the resistance of the
234
emulsion droplets and network to gravitational separation. As the oil fractions were
235
increased, the σ0 values of the emulsions were increased, and the low σ0 value of the
236
emulsions with low oil fractions may be inclined to separate as described by Torres et
237
al..24 Additionally, the behavior of high viscosity was strongly influenced by the high
238
stabilizer concentration or dispersed phase volume in the examined systems. The
239
increase in oil fractions of O/W emulsions led to the increased value of K and then the
240
changes in the viscosity of continuous phase. The n value reflected the degree of 11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
241
non-Newtonian behavior. All the n values were less than 1 (Table 1), indicating the
242
pseudoplastic fluid characteristics of the O/W emulsions (Figure 1B).24 Moreover, the
243
increase in φ values of the O/W emulsions resulted in the decreased n value,
244
indicating that the deviation from Newtonian behavior was increased.25
245
Viscoelastic Properties of O/W Emulsions. The viscoelastic property of the corn
246
oil emulsions stabilized by gelatin was determined by dynamic oscillation
247
measurements. The emulsions at various φ values showed that G′ modulus was
248
predominantly higher than G″ modulus at a given frequency over the range of 1 - 100
249
rad s−1, indicating the presence of a gel-like structure in the O/W emulsion system.26
250
The significant increase was observed regarding G′ modulus in emulsions with φ
251
values increasing from 0.2 to 0.6. This may be attributed to the hydrocolloid-induced
252
formation of an entanglement network between adsorbed and non-adsorbed proteins,
253
and the oil droplets stabilized by proteins served as ‘active fillers’ in the gel network
254
of the emulsions.27 On the other hand, both the tested modulus of these emulsions
255
slightly but progressively increased with the increasing frequency (Figure 1C). A
256
similar trend regarding the rise of G′ and G″ modulus with the increasing frequency
257
has been also observed for the gel-like emulsions stabilized by texturised whey
258
protein concentrate, which was ascribed to a predominantly solid behavior of the
259
gel-like emulsions with long term stability.20
260
Droplet Size and Microstructure of the Emulsions. The extensive dilution and
261
ultrasonic treatment were necessary for the determination of average droplet size in
262
the concentrated emulsions using a light-scattering instrument, which may not ensure 12
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 39
Page 13 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
263
that a sample examined actually properly represented the gel-like emulsions. Then a
264
light microscope was available to assess the presence and aggregation extent of oil
265
droplets in the emulsions as a straightforward and reliable way.
266
As the φ value was increased from 0.2 to 0.6, the diameter of the oil droplets
267
progressively increased. The average diameter of the oil droplets at φ = 0.2 was 5.82
268
μm, and the emulsions consisted of aggregated oil droplets (Figure 2A). The
269
inter-droplet attractive interactions may contribute to the formation of the gel-like
270
network. Additionally, at the low φ value, the unabsorbed proteins would tend to form
271
the aggregates driven by hydrophobic interactions after the emulsification, which may
272
be helpful to the formation of the network.28 When the φ value was increased to 0.4,
273
the increasing average diameter of the oil droplets might result in a closer packing and
274
then a more compact gel network (Figure 2B). Chivero, Gohtani, Yoshii, and
275
Nakamura also reported that an improved emulsion stability at higher oil fractions
276
may be associated with a strong network formed among the close droplets. The oil
277
droplet size became larger and came up to 14.67 μm at φ = 0.6 (Figure 2C), indicating
278
the stronger interactions between protein-stabilized oil droplets and much less
279
unabsorbed proteins present in the system.21,29 However, when the φ value rose up to
280
0.8, some larger oil droplets were observed in the emulsions (Figure 2D). Since the φ
281
value was increased, the volume of aqueous phase was relatively decreased. Then, the
282
amount of gelatin emulsifier might be not sufficient to cover the O/W interface,
283
resulting in the formation of larger droplets.22 The changes of the oil droplets with the
284
increasing φ values were well in accordance with the observed flow behaviors under 13
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
285
precisely controlled conditions. Liu and Tang also found that the droplet size of
286
Pickering emulsions basically increased along with the increasing oil volume fractions,
287
even coarser emulsions were formed at higher oil fractions.30
288
Morphology and Microstructure of Electrospun Nanofibers. The uniform and
289
bead-free nanofibers could be obtained by electrospinning of the pure gelatin with an
290
average diameter of 148.9 nm (Figure 3A). For the gelatin-stabilized emulsions, the
291
increasing φ values from 0.2 to 0.8 appreciably affected the formation of the
292
electrospun fibers. As shown in Figure 3B, the O/W emulsions yielded fibers with the
293
average diameter of 198.4 nm at φ = 0.2, and a great number of beads were
294
interspersed along the strings. It could be thus inferred that the oil droplets tended to
295
accumulate in the center of the liquid along the direction of fluid due to the elongation
296
effect in the expanding and bending process of fluid jets during electrospinning,
297
which might contribute to the encapsulation of beads into fibers rather than on
298
surfaces.31 When the φ value was increased to 0.4, the electrospun nanofibers had
299
larger diameters, indicating that more corn oil was encapsulated in the fibers (Figure
300
3C). Similarly, Gordon et al. reported that the increasing isohexadecane (oil phase)
301
from 5.8 to 15% (w/w) resulted in the increasing average diameter of PVA fibers from
302
246 to 268 nm.32 Although it was expected that the fibers produced from emulsions
303
with higher φ values (e.g., at φ = 0.6) had a further increase in diameters (Figure 3D),
304
the fibers tended to be merged together and lose the fiber morphology to some extent.
305
At φ = 0.8, the nanofibers adhered to one another, and the fibrous structure could be
306
hardly observed in SEM images (Figure 3E). These morphological changes may be 14
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 39
Page 15 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
307
attributed to the balance of the oil volume fraction and the viscosity of emulsions as a
308
result of the amount of corn oil entrapped and the aggregation extent of oil droplets in
309
the emulsions.33
310
As shown in Figure 4A, TEM observations showed that the nanofibers by
311
electrospinning of the gel-like emulsion at φ = 0.2 possessed an obvious core-shell
312
structure. The encapsulated oil was not just located inside the beads as core, but a
313
portion of corn oil was randomly distributed in the gelatin matrix. By taking a closer
314
look at the core-shell structure of one single fiber (Figure 4B), the distinct boundaries
315
between the inner dark and outer light region was found in TEM images, indicating
316
the different transmissibility of electron beam through the center and side regions. It
317
was evidence that corn oil was wrapped into the center of the bead of the shell
318
material.34 Clearly, the outer diameter was about 400 nm while the inner diameter was
319
around 290 nm. The W/O emulsion electrospinning was reported by Xu et al.,35 who
320
suggested that the viscosity difference between the PEG-PLA/chloroform matrix and
321
the PEO-FITC/water droplets led to the inward movement of the emulsion droplets
322
and their mergence to some extent. In this study, the rapid evaporation of the acetic
323
aqueous solution led to the increasing viscosity of the outer layer (water phase), more
324
rapidly than that of the inner layer. Thus, the inward movement of emulsion droplets
325
from the surface to the center was caused by the viscosity gradient from the outer
326
layer to the inner layer, and the droplets were simultaneously condensed and stretched
327
into elliptical shapes in the direction of the fibrous trajectory under the force of high
328
voltage electric field. Finally, the core-shell nanofibers were obtained on the grounded 15
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
329
collector.
330
To identify whether the corn oil was successfully encapsulated in the nanofibers,
331
the distribution of corn oil within the nanofibers was observed by CLSM. The
332
fluorescence emitted only from the fibers was clearly observed in CLSM images,
333
while no fluorescent intensity was detected in the space between the fibers (Figure
334
4C). The corn oil stained with Nile Red (yellow core) were coated by gelatin (outer
335
dark layer), indicating the successful fabrication of core-shell fibers with corn oil in
336
the core. Dai, Niu, Liu, Yin, and Xu successfully encapsulated laccase into
337
PDLLA/F108 nanofibers by electrospinning of W/O emulsions, and identified that
338
laccase was located in the core of the core-shell fibers using CLSM.36 Yang, Li, Qi,
339
Zhou, and Weng showed the presence of the labeled lysozyme inside the composite
340
fibers, and confirmed that the emulsion-based electrospun fibers had a core-shell
341
structure under CLSM.34
342
Thermal Analysis. The thermal stability changes of the electrospun nanofibers
343
were monitored by TGA analysis. There were two stages involved in the
344
decomposition of the gelatin nanofibers on the TGA curves (Figure 5A). The initial
345
stage of weight loss began at 50 °C and ended up with around 100 °C, which could be
346
described as moisture vaporization of gelatin samples due to its hygroscopic property.
347
The second stage in the range of 250 - 600 °C was the major zone of weight loss,
348
corresponding to the main thermal degradation including protein chain breakage and
349
peptide bond rupture.37 Unlike the gelatin fibers, nanofibers fabricated by
350
electrospinning of the gelatin-stabilized emulsions showed a single stage of thermal 16
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 39
Page 17 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
351
degradation ranging from 250 to 450 °C. Therefore, the fibers at various oil fractions
352
(φ = 0 - 0.8) had a high thermal decomposition stability upon heating to 250 °C.
353
Below the onset decomposition temperature (250 °C), DSC measurements were
354
conducted to investigate the thermal properties of these fibers. The denaturation
355
temperature (TD) and the corresponding denaturation enthalpy (ΔHD) were obtained
356
from the characteristic endothermic peaks (Figure 5B), which were associated
357
with the conformational helix–coil transition of gelatin.38 The TD of the nanofibers by
358
gelatin electrospinning was about 89.67 °C, while the TD of the electrospun fibers
359
made from the gelatin-stabilized O/W emulsions (φ = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8) were 85.32,
360
77.97, 82.99 and 87.25 °C, respectively (Table 2). This moderate decrease in TD might
361
be due to a rearrangement of the triple helix into a random configuration.39
362
FTIR Analysis. The possible interactions between gelatin and corn oil in the
363
electrospun nanofibers were examined by FTIR spectra (Figure 6). Generally, the
364
characteristic bands of proteins at 3291 - 3298 cm−1 belonged to the stretching of N-H
365
and hydrogen bonding for the amide A. The amide I band (1636 - 1643 cm−1) was
366
assigned to the stretching of C=O. The amide II band at about 1541 cm−1 was ascribed
367
to the stretching and bending of C-N. The spectra showed a peak at around 1456 cm−1,
368
which was assigned to N-H bending and C-N stretching combination band as well as
369
NH3+ symmetric deformation. The amide III band between 1241 and 1243 cm−1 was
370
associated with the stretching of C-N and bending of N-H.40 For the corn oil, the peak
371
at around 3008 cm−1 represented C-H stretching vibration of the cis-double bond
372
(=CH). The 2925 and 2854 cm−1 bands were assigned to symmetric and asymmetric 17
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
373
stretching vibration of the aliphatic CH2 group. The peak at 1745 cm−1 could be
374
explained by the presence of ester carbonyl groups of the triglycerides. The bands at
375
1464 and 1377 cm−1 belonged to bending vibrations of the CH2 and CH3 aliphatic
376
groups as well as CH2 groups. In the fingerprint region, the band at around 1162 cm−1
377
denoted the stretching vibration of the C-O ester groups.41 The characteristic bands of
378
both the gelatin fibers and corn oil were found in all the spectra of the nanofiber mats
379
by emulsion electrospinning (φ = 0.2 - 0.8), and no obvious change in the intensity
380
and position of these peaks was observed, indicating that the binding of corn oil to
381
gelatin may be mainly driven by the non-covalent interaction forces.
382
The amide I band may provide the information of the secondary structures of
383
proteins. The curve-fitting analysis of the amide I region (1700 - 1600 cm−1) was used
384
to quantitatively determine the secondary structural changes of gelatin.42 The spectral
385
bands ranging from 1610 to 1640 cm−1, 1640 to 1650 cm−1, 1650 to 1660 cm−1, 1660
386
to 1680 cm−1 and 1680 to 1692 cm−1 were assigned to β-sheet, random coil, α-helix,
387
β-turn and β-antiparallel, respectively.43 Compared to the nanofibers by gelatin
388
electrospinning, a trend in the decreasing α-helix content and the increasing random
389
coil occurred in the fibers electrospun by the gelatin-stabilized emulsions at various φ
390
values (Table 3), indicating the conformational helix–coil transition of gelatin, in
391
good agreement with our DSC results. The β-sheet structure was predominant at a
392
high percentage in the electrospun fibers, which seemed to be inconsistent with the
393
previous work that the α-helix structure dominated the secondary structure of
394
gelatin.44 The difference may be caused by the acidic solvents used herein to dissolve 18
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 39
Page 19 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
395
gelatin, which had some adverse effect on the structural properties of protein.45 In
396
addition, the electrospinning process may also have a great impact on the protein
397
conformation. In general, the protein/peptide aggregation mainly involved β-sheet due
398
to a weaker dipole moment of β-sheet than that of α-helix.34 When the φ value was
399
increased to 0.4 or 0.6, the increase in the oil volume fraction led to a significant
400
increase in the β-sheet content, indicating the increased aggregation of gelatin
401
molecules in the electrospun fibers with higher oil fractions. This aggregation at the
402
interface was helpful to the formation of continuous fibers coating corn oil.46
403
However, a lower aggregation of gelatin may occur at φ = 0.8, which may be
404
associated with the insufficient coverage of gelatin molecules on the interface, and
405
then result in the loss of fiber morphology.
406
Encapsulation Efficiency and Storage Stability. The encapsulation efficiency of
407
the emulsion-based electropun fibers was significantly increased with the increasing φ
408
value (Table 4). As the φ value increased to 0.6, the encapsulation efficiency reached
409
up to 86.86%, indicating that the emulsion-based electropun fibers have a great
410
potential to be used as a delivery vehicle. Similar results were reported by
411
Tavassoli-Kafrani, Goli, and Fathi,18 who fabricated the electrospun gelatin and
412
gelatin-crosslinked nanofibers loaded with orange essential oil, respectively. They
413
found an increase in the encapsulation efficiency of both gelatin and
414
gelatin-crosslinked nanofibers with the increasing amount of essential oil. However,
415
the highest encapsulation efficiency of the gelatin and gelatin-crosslinked nanofibers
416
was observed at the ratios of 1:1 and 1:0.74, respectively, probably due to the 19
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
417
insufficient coverage of gelatin crosslinked by tannic over the surface of oil droplets
418
at a 1:1 ratio during the emulsion formation.
419
As expected, there was no significant change in the encapsulation efficiency at
420
various φ values during 5 days. The encapsulation efficiency of fresh nanofibers (φ =
421
0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8) were 80.41, 85.85, 86.86, and 87.16%, while it became 79.89,
422
85.28, 87.16, and 87.75% after 5 days, respectively. Especially, the encapsulation
423
efficiency at φ = 0.6 showed no significant difference during 5 days. The results
424
showed the excellent storage stability of the encapsulated corn oil and the good
425
barrier effect of emulsion-based electropun fibers as wall materials. Tavassoli-Kafrani,
426
Goli, and Fathi also reported that the storage stability of orange essential oil
427
encapsulated in the electrospun gelatin fibers was more than 120 h.18
428
In this work, core-shell nanofibers were fabricated by electrospinning of corn
429
oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by gelatin. For the gelatin-stabilized O/W emulsions,
430
gelatin could rapidly diffuse to the newly formed water-oil interface and form the
431
steric protein-based barrier. The higher oil fraction contributed to the higher apparent
432
viscosity and modulus of elasticity, resulting in the gel-like appearance of emulsions.
433
Under high-voltage electric field, the O/W emulsions could be electrospun to form
434
core-shell nanofibers. The average diameter of electrospun fibers was increased from
435
148.9 to 311.4 nm by the increasing oil fraction (φ = 0.2 - 0.6), and the encapsulation
436
efficiency was also increased from 80.41 to 86.86%. Moreover, the nanofiber mats
437
had good storage stability and thermal decomposition stability, and thus were expect
438
to encapsulate thermosensitive or hydrophobic bioactive compounds as a 20
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 20 of 39
Page 21 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
439
controlled-release delivery vehicle.
440
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
441
We sincerely acknowledge the financial support by the National Natural Science
442
Foundation of China (Grant No. 31772013).
443
REFERENCES
444 445 446
(1)
Mendes, A. C.; Stephansen, K.; Chronakis, I. S. Electrospinning of food
proteins and polysaccharides. Food Hydrocolloids 2017, 68, 53-68. (2)
Bhushani,
J.
A.;
Anandharamakrishnan,
C.
Electrospinning
and
447
electrospraying techniques: Potential food based applications. Trends Food Sci.
448
Technol. 2014, 38, 21-33.
449
(3)
Deng, L. L.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Que, F.; Kang, X. F.; Liu, Y. Y.; Feng, F. Q.;
450
Zhang, H. Characterization of gelatin/zein nanofibers by hybrid electrospinning. Food
451
Hydrocolloids 2018, 75, 72-80.
452
(4)
Zhang, H.; Jia, X. L.; Han, F. X.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, Y. H.; Fan, Y. B.; Yuan, X.
453
Y. Dual-delivery of VEGF and PDGF by double-layered electrospun membranes for
454
blood vessel regeneration. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 2202-2212.
455
(5)
Chen, X.; Wang, J.; An, Q. Z.; Li, D. W.; Liu, P. X.; Zhu, W.; Mo, X. M.
456
Electrospun poly (l-lactic acid-co-ɛ-caprolactone) fibers loaded with heparin and
457
vascular endothelial growth factor to improve blood compatibility and endothelial
458
progenitor cell proliferation. Colloids Surf. B-Biointerfaces 2015, 128, 106-114. 21
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
459 460 461
(6)
Topuz, F.; Uyar, T. Electrospinning of gelatin with tunable fiber morphology
from round to flat/ribbon. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 2017, 80, 371-378. (7)
Zamani, M.; Prabhakaran, M. P.; Ramakrishna, S. Advances in drug delivery
462
via electrospun and electrosprayed nanomaterials. Int. J. Nanomed. 2013, 8,
463
2997-3017.
464
(8)
Cai, N.; Han, C.; Luo, X.; Chen, G.; Dai, Q.; Yu, F. Fabrication of core/shell
465
nanofibers with desirable mechanical and antibacterial properties by pickering
466
emulsion electrospinning. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2017, 302, 1-10.
467
(9)
Shin, J.; Lee, S. Encapsulation of phytoncide in nanofibers by emulsion
468
electrospinning and their antimicrobial assessment. Fibers Polym. 2018, 19(3),
469
627-634.
470
(10) Camerlo, A.; Bühlmann-Popa, A. M.; Vebert-Nardin, C.; Rossi, R. M.;
471
Fortunato, G. Environmentally controlled emulsion electrospinning for the
472
encapsulation of temperature-sensitive compounds. J. Mater. Sci. 2014, 49,
473
8154-8162.
474 475
(11) Arecchi, A.; Mannino, S.; Weiss, J. Electrospinning of poly(vinyl alcohol) nanofibers loaded with hexadecane nanodroplets. J. Food Sci. 2010, 75, 80-88.
476
(12) Spano, F.; Quarta, A.; Martelli, C.; Ottobrini, L.; Rossi, R. M.; Gigli, G.;
477
Blasi, L. Fibrous scaffolds fabricated by emulsion electrospinning: from hosting
478
capacity to in vivo biocompatibility. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 9293-303.
479
(13) Okutan, N.; Terzi, P.; Altay, F. Affecting parameters on electrospinning
480
process and characterization of electrospun gelatin nanofibers. Food Hydrocolloids 22
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 22 of 39
Page 23 of 39
481 482 483
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
2014, 39, 19-26. (14) Dickinson E. Hydrocolloids as emulsifiers and emulsion stabilizers. Food Hydrocolloids, 2009, 23(6), 1473-1482.
484
(15) Deng, L. L.; Kang, X. F.; Liu, Y. Y.; Feng, F. Q.; Zhang, H. Effects of
485
surfactants on the formation of gelatin nanofibres for controlled release of curcumin.
486
Food Chem., 2017, 231, 70-77.
487
(16) Li, H.; Wang, M.; Williams, G. R.; Wu, J.; Sun, X.; Lv, Y.; Zhu, L. M.
488
Electrospun gelatin nanofibers loaded with vitamins A and E as antibacterial wound
489
dressing materials. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 50267-50277.
490
(17) Laha, A.; Yadav, S.; Majumdar, S.; Sharma, C. S. In-vitro release study of
491
hydrophobic drug using electrospun cross-linked gelatin nanofibers. Biochem. Eng. J.
492
2016, 105, 481-488.
493
(18) Tavassoli-Kafrani, E.; Goli, S. A. H.; Fathi, M. Encapsulation of orange
494
essential oil using cross-linked electrospun gelatin nanofibers. Food Bioprocess
495
Technol. 2018, 11(2), 427-434.
496
(19) Boutin, C.; Giroux, H. J.; Paquin, P.; Britten, M. Characterization and
497
acid-induced gelation of butter oil emulsions produced from heated whey protein
498
dispersions. Int. Dairy J. 2007, 17, 696-703.
499
(20) Manoi, K.; Rizvi, S. S. Emulsification mechanisms and characterizations of
500
cold, gel-like emulsions produced from texturized whey protein concentrate. Food
501
Hydrocolloids 2009, 23, 1837-1847.
502
(21) Gu, X.; Campbell, L. J.; Euston, S. R. Effects of different oils on the 23
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 24 of 39
503
properties of soy protein isolate emulsions and gels. Food Res. Int. 2009, 42, 925-932.
504
(22) Dai, L.; Sun, C.; Wei, Y.; Mao, L.; Gao, Y. Characterization of Pickering
505
emulsion gels stabilized by zein/gum arabic complex colloidal nanoparticles. Food
506
Hydrocolloids 2018, 74, 239-248.
507 508
(23) Park, S.; Chung, M. G.; Yoo, B. Effect of octenylsuccinylation on rheological properties of corn starch pastes. Starch-Starke 2004, 56(9), 399-406.
509
(24) Torres, L. G.; Iturbe, R.; Snowden, M. J.; Chowdhry, B. Z.; Leharne, S. A.
510
Preparation of O/W emulsions stabilized by solid particles and their characterization
511
by oscillatory rheology. Colloid Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2007, 302(1-3),
512
439-448.
513
(25) Dokić, L.; Krstonošić, V.; Nikolić, I. Physicochemical characteristics and
514
stability of oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by OSA starch. Food Hydrocolloids
515
2012, 29(1), 185-192.
516
(26) Miao, M.; Huang, C.; Jia, X.; Cui, S. W.; Jiang, B.; Zhang, T.
517
Physicochemical characteristics of a high molecular weight bioengineered α-D-glucan
518
from Leuconostoc citreum SK24.002. Food Hydrocolloids 2015, 50, 37-43.
519
(27) Chen, J.; Dickinson, E. Effect of surface character of filler particles on
520
rheology of heat-set whey protein emulsion gels. Colloids Surf. B-Biointerfaces 1999,
521
12, 373-381.
522
(28) Tang, C. H.; Liu, F. Cold, gel-like soy protein emulsions by
523
microfluidization:
Emulsion
characteristics,
rheological
524
properties, and gelling mechanism. Food Hydrocolloids 2013, 30, 61-72. 24
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
and
microstructural
Page 25 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
525
(29) Chivero, P.; Gohtani, S.;Yoshii, H.; Nakamura, A. Assessment of soy soluble
526
polysaccharide, gum arabic and OSA-Starch as emulsifiers for mayonnaise-like
527
emulsions. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 69, 59-66.
528
(30) Liu, F.; Tang, C. H. Soy glycinin as food-grade Pickering stabilizers: Part. III.
529
Fabrication of gel-like emulsions and their potential as sustained-release delivery
530
systems for β-carotene. Food Hydrocolloids 2016, 56, 434-444.
531
(31) Qi, H.; Hu, P.; Xu, J.; Wang, A. Encapsulation of drug reservoirs in fibers by
532
emulsion electrospinning: Morphology characterization and preliminary release
533
assessment. Biomacromolecules, 2006, 7, 2327-2330.
534 535 536 537
(32) Gordon, V.; Marom, G.; Magdassi, S. Formation of hydrophilic nanofibers from nanoemulsions through electrospinning. Int. J. Pharm. 2015, 478, 172-179. (33) Sy, J. C.; Klemm, A. S.; Shastri, V. P. Emulsion as a means of controlling electrospinning of polymers. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21(18), 1814-1819.
538
(34) Yang, Y; Li, X. H.; Qi, M. B.; Zhou, S. B.; Weng, J. Release pattern and
539
structural integrity of lysozyme encapsulated in core–sheath structured poly
540
(DL-lactide) ultrafine fibers prepared by emulsion electrospinning. Eur. J. Pharm.
541
Biopharm., 2008, 69(1), 106-116.
542
(35) Xu, X.; Zhuang, X.; Chen, X.; Wang, X.; Yang, L.; Jing, X. Preparation of
543
core-sheath composite nanofibers by emulsion electrospinning. Macromol. Rapid
544
Commun. 2006, 27, 1637-1642.
545 546
(36) Dai, Y.; Niu, J.; Liu, J.; Yin, L.; Xu, J. In situ encapsulation of laccase in microfibers by emulsion electrospinning:
Preparation, characterization, and
25
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
547
Page 26 of 39
application. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 8942-8947.
548
(37) Peña, C.; De La Caba, K. O. R. O.; Eceiza, A.; Ruseckaite, R.; Mondragon, I.
549
Enhancing water repellence and mechanical properties of gelatin films by tannin
550
addition. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 6836-6842.
551 552
(38) Zhang, Y. Z.; Venugopal, J.; Huang, Z. M.; Lim, C. T.; Ramakrishna, S. Crosslinking of the electrospun gelatin nanofibers. Polymer 2006, 47, 2911-2917.
553
(39) Bigi, A.; Cojazzi, G.; Panzavolta, S.; Rubini, K.; Roveri, N. Mechanical and
554
thermal properties of gelatin films at different degrees of glutaraldehyde crosslinking.
555
Biomaterials 2001, 22, 763-768.
556
(40) Muyonga, J. H.; Cole, C. G. B.; Duodu, K. G. Fourier transform infrared
557
(FTIR) spectroscopic study of acid soluble collagen and gelatin from skins and bones
558
of young and adult Nile perch (Lates niloticus). Food Chem. 2004, 86, 325-332.
559
(41) Vlachos,
N.;
Skopelitis,
Y.;
Psaroudaki,
M.;
Konstantinidou,
V.;
560
Chatzilazarou, A.; Tegou, E. Applications of fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy
561
to edible oils. Anal. Chim. Acta, 2006, 573, 459-465.
562
(42) Baltacıoğlu, H.; Bayındırlı, A.; Severcan, F. Secondary structure and
563
conformational change of mushroom polyphenol oxidase during thermosonication
564
treatment by using FTIR spectroscopy. Food Chem. 2017, 214, 507-514.
565
(43) Wang, X.; Xie, X.; Ren, C.; Yang, Y.; Xu, X.; Chen, X. Application of
566
molecular modelling and spectroscopic approaches for investigating binding of
567
vanillin to human serum albumin. Food Chem. 2011, 127, 705-710.
568
(44) Prystupa, D. A.; Donald, A. M. Infrared study of gelatin conformations in the 26
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 27 of 39
569
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
gel and sol states. Polym. Gels Networks 1996, 4, 87-110.
570
(45) Song, J. H.; Kim, H. E.; Kim, H. W. Production of electrospun gelatin
571
nanofiber by water-based co-solvent approach. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 2008, 19,
572
95-102.
573
(46) Lefèvre, T; Subirade, M. Formation of intermolecular β-sheet structures: a
574
phenomenon relevant to protein film structure at oil–water interfaces of emulsions. J.
575
Colloid Interface Sci., 2003, 263(1), 59-67.
576
27
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
577
Figure captions
578
Figure 1. (A) Shear-rate dependence of the viscosity of the gelatin-stabilized O/W
579
emulsions at various oil fractions (φ = 0.2 - 0.8). (B) Plots of shear stress versus shear
580
rate for the emulsions. The solid lines are the lines of best fit to the Herschel-Bulkeley
581
model. (C) Dynamic frequency sweep of the emulsions at various oil fractions (φ =
582
0.2 - 0.8). G′, solid line; G″, dashed line.
583
Figure 2. Optical micrographs for the gelatin-stabilized O/W emulsions at (A) φ = 0.2,
584
(B) 0.4, (C) 0.6 and (D) 0.8.
585
Figure 3. SEM micrographs of nanofibers by electrospinning of (A) gelatin, and the
586
gelatin-stabilized O/W emulsions at (B) φ = 0.2, (C) 0.4, (D) 0.6 and (E) 0.8.
587
Figure 4. (A), (B) TEM and (C) CLSM micrographs of the core-shell nanofibers by
588
emulsion electrospinning at φ = 0.2.
589
Figure 5. (A) TGA thermogram and (B) DSC curves of nanofibers by electrospinning
590
of gelatin and the gelatin-stabilized O/W emulsions at various oil fractions (φ = 0.2 -
591
0.8).
592
Figure 6. ATR-FTIR spectra of the gelatin-based nanofibers by emulsion
593
electrospinning at various oil fractions (φ = 0 - 0.8).
594
28
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 28 of 39
Page 29 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Table 1. Rheological parameters of the gelatin-stabilized O/W emulsions by Herschel-Bulkley model.
Oil fractions
σ0 (Pa)
K (Pa Sn)
n
R2
φ = 0.2
0.231
0.968
0.998
0.999
φ = 0.4
1.707
2.787
0.885
0.999
φ = 0.6
5.972
9.901
0.754
0.999
φ = 0.8
5.643
8.207
0.702
0.999
29
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 30 of 39
Table 2. The denaturation temperature (TD) and the corresponding denaturation enthalpy (ΔHD) of nanofibers by electrospinning of gelatin and the gelatin-stabilized O/W emulsions at various oil fractions. Gelatin
φ = 0.2
φ = 0.4
φ = 0.6
φ = 0.8
TD (°C)
89.67 ± 0.58a
85.32 ± 2.21b
77.97 ± 1.67c
82.99 ± 3.21c
87.55 ± 2.48a
ΔHD° (J g−1)
289.84 ± 31.62a
179.78 ± 15.72b
109.66 ± 10.54c
100.39 ± 22.16c
64.75 ± 6.89d
30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 31 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Table 3. The contents of secondary structures of nanofibers by electrospinning of gelatin and the gelatin-stabilized O/W emulsions at various oil fractions. α-helix/%
β-sheet/%
β-turn/%
Random coil /%
β-antiparallel/%
Gelatin
22.62 ± 0.38a
27.22 ± 0.21b
22.40 ± 0.57b
13.57 ± 0.21b
14.19 ± 0.40a
φ = 0.2
17.65 ± 0.21b
28.51 ± 0.72b
23.09 ± 0.14ab
17.65 ± 0.46a
13.10 ± 0.98ab
φ = 0.4
14.15 ± 0.11c
45.02 ± 0.17a
18.63 ± 0.51c
18.20 ± 0.22a
4.0 ± 0.66c
φ = 0.6
14.42 ± 0.29c
44.69 ± 0.13a
19.63 ± 0.33c
17.21 ± 0.19a
4.05 ± 0.51c
φ = 0.8
17.30 ± 0.45b
28.13 ± 0.27b
24.94 ± 0.19a
17.47 ± 0.86a
12.16 ± 0.79b
Results are expressed as mean values ± standard deviation of 3 replicates. Different letters in each column indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
31
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 32 of 39
Table 4. The encapsulation efficiency and storage stability of the emulsion-based electrospun fiber mats at various oil fractions. Encapsulation efficiency (%) 0 day
1 day
3 day
5 day
φ = 0.2
80.41 ± 0.12Aa
79.92 ± 0.05Ba
79.89 ± 0.08Ba
79.89 ± 0.08Ba
φ = 0.4
85.85 ± 0.07Ab
86.10 ± 0.05Ab
85.27 ± 0.14Bb
85.28 ± 0.07Bb
φ = 0.6
86.86 ± 0.05Ac
87.13 ± 0.12Ac
86.93 ± 0.06Ac
87.16 ± 0.03Ac
φ = 0.8
87.16 ± 0.01Ac
87.12 ± 0.07Ac
86.86 ± 0.08Ac
87.75 ± 0.11Ac
The same superscript capital letters in each row represent no significant difference at p < 0.05. The same superscript small letters in each column represent no significant difference at p < 0.05.
32
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 33 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 1. (A)
(B)
(C)
33
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 2. (A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
34
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 34 of 39
Page 35 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 3. (A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(E)
35
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 4. (A)
(B)
(C)
36
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 36 of 39
Page 37 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 5. (A)
(B)
37
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 6.
38
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 38 of 39
Page 39 of 39
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
TOC Graphic
39
ACS Paragon Plus Environment