Formation of porphyrin ferryl (FeO2+) complexes ... - ACS Publications

Formation of porphyrin ferryl (FeO2+) complexes through the addition of nitrogen bases to peroxo-bridged iron(III) porphyrins. Der-Hang Chin, Alan L. ...
0 downloads 0 Views 367KB Size
I446

Journal of'the American Chemical Societji

the total integrated area of the two EPR signals remains constant. (20) For an example of valence isomerism between bent and linear coordinated NO in cobalt complexes see Collman, J. P.; Farnham, P.: Dolcetti, G. J. Am. Chem. SOC. 1971, 93, 1788.

Robert R. Gagnk,* D. Michael Ingle Contribution No. 6104 Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 91 I25 Receiced September 10, 1979

Currently, ion-molecule reactions are the objects of intense investigations. Results from these studies have proven to be valuable in expanding the availability of gas-phase thermochemical values such as electron affinities and heats of formation. In particular, data from the study of ion-neutral association reactions provide a foundation for understanding subjects such as ion solvation, atmospheric ion chemistry, nucleation phenomena, and ion-molecule interactions.1.2 Recently, Robbiani and Franklin3 have reported upper limits to the heats of formation of SO2CI- and (SO2)2CI- based on observations of the ion-molecule reactions

-

+ c12 S204CI- + Cl2

SO2CI-

/

F~hriccrrj13, 1980

Table I. Heats of Formation M

so2 c1-

SO*CI(S07)7CI-

-70.94 -58.8 -151.5 -234.8

5 5 this work this w o r k

Acknowledgment. Support of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under Grant No. NSG-2248 is gratefully acknowledged. ( 1 ) Castleman, A. W., Jr. NATOAdv. Study Inst., Ser. B: Phys., Kinet. Ion-Mol.

Sir:

+ so2c12 SO2CI- + S02Cl2

102.4

References and Notes

Heats of Formation of S02CI- and (SO2)2CI-

CI-

/

(1)

(2)

From these reactions, they compute AHfo(S02CI-) I- 136 kcal/mol and AHf(S204CI-) 5 -220 kcal/mol by postulating that the observed S204CI- is formed by reaction 2. (The authors inadvertently use the upper limit for AHfo(S02CI-) as a lower limit to conclude that this value must be near - 135 kcal/ mol .) In our laboratory, a high pressure mass spectrometric technique has been employed4 for determining the thermodynamic quantities of gas-phase reactions of the form A - . B , + B*A-.Bn+l (3) Briefly, ions are formed in a high pressure region, typically 5 to 15 Torr, and focused into a thermally controlled reaction cell. The pressure is sufficiently high such that the ions reside in this cell for a time adequately long for clustering reactions to equilibrate. The ions leak through a small orifice (typically 75-p diameter) into a high vacuum region where they are mass analyzed and counted. From the ion intensities and known partial pressure of the clustering neutral, the equilibrium constant K , , , + I is determined. Among the reactions which have been recently studied are the first four addition reactions ( n = 0-3) of SO2 onto CIThis work will be presented in greater detail in a future publication. From the enthalpy change for the first two of these reactions (-21.8 for n = 0 and - 12.3 kcal/mol for n = 1) and from the heat of formation of CI- and SOz, the heats of formation of SO2CI- and (SO2)2C1- can be computed. These values are listed in Table I. The heats of formation in the present study are well below the upper limit previously published by Robbiani and Franklin3 and are, therefore, consistent with their results. The value of -AH"o,l for reaction 3 is 21.8 kcal/mol and is equivalent to D(SO2-CI-). Robbiani and Franklin3 concluded that this value was small (-5 kcal/mol) from their erroneous AHro(S02-Cl-). Nonetheless, D(SO2-CI-) is still somewhat less than D(CI-CI-) which is 27 kcal/mol. Therefore, their expectation that some of thek observed SO2CI3- is formed by the reaction of SO2CI- with SO2C12 may still be valid. 0002-7863/80/ 1502- l446$01 .OO/O

React., 7979 1979, 295-32 1. (2) Castleman, A. W., Jr. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 1979, 70, 73. (3) Robbiani, R.; Franklin, J. L. J . Am. Chem. SOC.1979, 707, 3709. (4) See, for example: Keesee, R. G.; Lee, N.; Castleman, A. W.. Jr. J. Am. Chem. SOC. 1979, 701, 2599. Castleman, A. W., Jr.; Holland, P. M.; Lindsay, D. M.; Peterson, K. I. bid. 1978, 700, 6039. Also see references contained therein. (5) National Bureau of Standards Technical Note 270-3, 1968. These values were also used by Robbiani and Franklin.

Robert G . Keesee, A. W. Castleman, Jr.* Department of Chemistry and Chemical Physics Laboratory C I R E S , University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309 Receiced October 1 I , I979 Formation of Porphyrin Ferry1 ( F e 0 2 + )Complexes through the Addition of Nitrogen Bases to Peroxo-Bridged Iron(II1) Porphyrins Sir:

The ferryl group (Fe1V=0)2+, or a protonated form thereof, has been frequently postulated as an intermediate in the mechanism of action of peroxidases, particularly in the identity of compound I1 of horseradish peroxidase, and in the autoxidation of Fe(II).2 Complexes of Fe(1V) are rare' and no well-characterized, low molecular weight complexes containing the ferryl group are available for detailed study.4 We recently reported on spectroscopic characterization of the Fe( I l l ) peroxo-bridged complex, PFeOzFeP ( P = a porphyrin dianion), which is formed by the addition of dioxygen to unligated PFe in toluene solution a t low temperature.' We now report that nitrogeneous bases react with PFe02FeP to yield new complexes which appear best described as ferryl complexes. Addition of N-methylimidazole (Mc-lni) to TmTPFeOzFeTmTP (TmTP = dianion of meso-tetra-mtolylporphyrin) at -80 OC in toluene solution produces a new complex 1 (Me-ImTmTPFeO),, whose unique I H N M R and electronic spectra are shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. Titration of N-methylirnidazole into a solution of TmTPFeOzFeTmTP reveals that 2 mol of base are required to consume all of the peroxide-bridged dimer originally present. Addition of further N-methylimidazole results in the growth of peaks characteristic of the free base, thus demonstrating that exchange between free iV-methylimidazole and the newly formed iron complex is slow. The peaks due to coordinated Me-Im have not been resolved. 1 is indefinitely stable ( > I week) a t -80 "C, while above -30 OC it decomposes to TmTPFeOFeTmTP at an appreciable rate.6 The solution magnetic susceptibility of 1 measured a t 360 M H z using the Evans technique' is 2.9 f 0.1 FB/iron ion a t -52 "C and is invariant down to -90 "C. Moreover the temperature dependence of the porphyrin paramagnetic shifts strictly follows the Curie law7 over a larger temperature range (-85 to +15 "C) as is shown in the insert of Figure 1. Hence the iron ions exist in well-defined paramagnetic, noninteracting states. D 1980 American Chemical Society

Communications to the Editor

I -20

g

I

I

-I5

-10 SHIFT IN PPM,

I447 1

1

-

0 I

9u

I -5 FROM TMS

I

I

0

5

Figure 1. The 100-MHz ' H N M R spectrum of 1 i n toluene-dg at 200 K in the presence of excess M e - l m . The resonance assignments are (a) ortho phenyl hydrogens, (b) meta and para phenyl hydrogens. (c) uncoordinated Me-Im, (d) pyrrole hydrogens, (e) meta methyl hydrogens, (x) resonances from the solvent. Resonance e is absent in (Me-ImTPPFeO), (TPP = dianion o f meso-tetraphenylporphyrin). Resonances a, b, and e are absent i n the spectrum of [Me-lmTP(dzo)PFeO],. The split methyl resonance e is characteristic of metalloporphyrins having unsymmetrical coordination with respect to the porphyrin plane. The insert on the upper left shows the temperature dependence of the absolute paramagnetic shifts for 1: 0 ,peak d upfield shift; 0,peak a, downfield shift; A. peak b downfield shift.

400

50 0

600

WAVELENGTH NM Figure 2. The visible spectrum of 1 in toluene solution at 183 K . The extinction coefficients are calculated per iron.

of 1 and PFeO2FeP toward PFe suggests that the oxo ligand of 1 is more readily accessible for attack by Fe(I1) and offers further support for the postulated ferryl structure.

-

Frozen solutions of 1 a t 77 K do not display an electron spin BPFeO PFe B PFeOFeP (1) resonance spectrum. Related complexes, (BTPPFeO),, with B as pyridine or The formation of PFeO2FeP and 1 emphasizes the imporpiperidine, form upon addition of these bases to TPPFe02tance of the sequence in which substrates interact with PFe in FeTPP a t -80 OC. The electronic spectra, 'H NMR determining the stoichiometry and structure of the products. spectra, and magnetic susceptibility of these two species are When dioxygen is added to FeP after the addition of a nivery similar to those reported above 1. Under similar conditions trogenous base, the reversible dioxygen carrier BPFe0214 is a t -80 O C in toluene solution there is no reaction between formed a t low temperature and upon warming is directly TPPFe02FeTPP and either thiols or organic sulfides. converted into PFeOFeP. When the order of substrate addition Probable structures for 1 are A and B. The dimer A would is reversed, PFe02FeP first forms and this in turn reacts with result from direct addition of the nitrogen bases to the intact base to give 1 rather than diamagnetic BPFe02. peroxide-bridged complex, while the existance of B requires The chemical reactivity of 1 is under further investigacleavage of an 0-0 bond. The susceptibility measurements tion. on 1 are consistent only with a triplet ground state for the c ~ m p l e xConsequently .~ a low-spin Fe(IV) formulation is the Acknowledgment. This work was generously supported by most reasonable spin/oxidation state assignment for the the National Institutes of Health (GM 26226 and HL 16087) metal.I0 To achieve the Fe(1V) state the peroxo 0-0 bond and the UCD N M R Facility. must be broken. The paramagnetic behavior of 1 also is conReferences and Notes sistent with a monomeric species and contrasts with the'antiferromagnetic behavior of TPPFe02FeTPPS and TPPFeO(1) Dunford, H. D.; Stillman, J. S.Coord. Chem. Rev. 1976, 19, 187. Dunford, H. B. Adv. Inorg. Biochem., in press. FeTPP" which have magnetic moments of 2.6 and 1.5 pg a t (2) Collman, J. P. Acc. Chem. Res. 1977, IO, 265. -50 O C with values of the antiferromagnetic coupling constant (3) Examples of low-spin Fe(iV) include Fe[ &&14(AsMe2)2]C122+ (Hazeldean, G. S.F.; Nyholm, R. S.; Parish, R. V. J. Chem. SOC.A 1966, 162), (Fe[o2 5 of 265 and 380 K, respectively. The magnetic susceptibility C ~ H ~ ( P M ~ ) Z ](Warren, ~ C I ~ ~L.~ F.; + Bennett, M. A. Inorg. Chem. 1976, 15, and electronic spectra also resemble closely those properties 3126), and Fe(S2NCR2)3+(Pasek, E. A.; Straub, D. K. /bid. 1972, 1 I, 259). displayed by compound I1 of horseradish p e r ~ x i d a s e . ' ~ , ~ ~ High-spin Fe(lV) exists in FeTPPCIt (Felton, R. H.; Owens, G. S.; Dolphin,

+

B(TmTP)FeOzFe(TmTP)B BTmTPFeO A B Further support for the monomeric formulation for 1 comes from its reaction with TmTPFe. At -80 "C, 1 reacts instantaneously with T m T P F e to generate quantitatively TmTPFeOFeTmTP and free B according to eq 1. These data establish the iron to oxygen ratio in 1 as 1:l. In contrast to the rapid occurrence of reaction 1, solutions of PFe02FeP and PFe show no indication of reaction after being mixed and held a t -80 O C for 2 days. The large difference in kinetic reactivity

+

D. Forman, A.; Borg, D. C.; Fajar, J. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1973, 206, 504). . (4) A complex of the analogous ruthenyl group Ru02+ has recently been reported: Moyer, B. A.; Meyer, T. J. J. Am. Chem. SOC.1976, 100, 3601. (5) Chin, D. H.; Del Gaudio, J.; La Mar, G. N.; Balch. A. L. J. Am. Chem. SOC. 1977, 99, 5486. (6)Dioxygen is not liberated during this conversion and the chemical fate of the other oxygen atom is under investigation. In contrast, PFe02FeP decomposes according to the reaction 2PFe02FeP 2PFeOFeP 02. Balch, A. L.; Chin, D. H.;La Mar, G. N. J. Am. Chem. SOC.,in press. (7) Evans, D. F. J. Chem. SOC.1953, 2003. (8) Jesson, J. P. "N.M.R. of Paramagnetic Molecules", La Mar, G. N., Horrocks. W. Dew., Jr., Holm, R. H., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, 1973; p 1. (9) Figgis, B. N.; Lewis, J. Prog. Inorg. Cbem. 1964, 6, 37. (IO) An alternate diradical structure, Fe"llO., for the ferryl group with low-spin iron cannot be discounted at this poi%

-

+

1448

Journal of the American Chemical Society

/

102.4

/

February 13, 1980

(1 1) Moss, T. H.; Lillienthal, M. R.; Moleski, C.; Smylhe, G. A,; McDaniel, M. C.; Caughey, W. S. J. Chem. SOC.,Chem. Commun. 1972,263. (12) Blumberg, W. E.; Peisach, J.; Wittenberg, F. A,; Wittenberg. J. B. J. Bo/. Chem. 1988, 243, 1854. (13) Theorell, H.; Ehrenberg, A. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1975, 47, 442. (14) Weschler, C. J.; Anderson, D. L.; Basolo, F. J. Am. Chem. SOC.1975, 97,

6707.

Der-Hang Chin, Alan L. Balch,* Gerd N. La Mar* Department of Chemistry, Uniuersity of California Dauis, California 95616 Receiced July 16, I979

Association of d6 and d8 Metal Complexes in Solution. Formation of (pCH&H4NH2)Ir(C0)2Cl/ (p-CH3C6H4NH2)Ir(CO)2ClI~ Sir:

Reactions between metal complexes are now realized to be of significance to a variety of chemical processes including electron transfer,’ metal-metal bond formation in both clust e n 2 and chain compound^,^ reductive eliminati~n,~ and ligand substitution. An example of the latter class is the substitution reactions of the six-coordinate d6 complexes of the platinum metal [particularly Pt(IV)] .5,6 For these reactions, catalysis by planar d8 complexes of the same metal occurs and a halobridged species involving the d6 and d8 reaction partners has been postulated as part of the reaction m e c h a n i ~ mHowever, .~ direct observation of the halo-bridged species has not been reported.8 We now describe a pair of d6 [Ir(III)] and d8 [Ir(I)] complexes which associate in solution through a halo bridge. Oxidation of (p-CH3C6H4NH2)Ir(C0)2Cl, 1 (uc-0 2086, 2004 cm-’ in CH2C12 solution, 2090, 2027 in Nujol mull), which has been extensively used as a precursor of Ir(1) comp o u n d ~ ,with ~ an excess of iodine produces six-coordinate brown (p-CH3C6H4NH2)Ir(CO)2C112,*o 2 ( U C ~ 2151,2105 O in CH2C12 solution, 2143, 2090 cm-] in Nujol mull). The electronic spectra of dichloromethane solutions of mixtures of 1 and 2 show features which are not present in the spectra of the individual components. In Figure 1 the new absorption characteristic of adduct formation is seen a t 490 nm. This feature develops immediately upon mixing of 1 and 2. Analysis of the concentration dependence of this band indicates that the adduct 3 is formed via (CH3C6H4NH2)Ir(C0)2Cl 1 (CH3C6H4NH2)Ir(C0)2ClI2 2

dinate complex is not detectable. Likewise 1 does not form an adduct with iodobenzene or chlorobenzene. Structural information about 3 is available from its infrared spectra. In dichloromethane solutions prepared either by mixing 1 and 2 or by dissolving 3 there are no absorptions in the C O stretching region (2200-1600 cm-l) other than those due to 1 and 2. Additionally the carbonyl stretching absorptions of solid 3 as a Nujol mull (2133,2087,2080,2009 cm-I) occur a t similar energies as were found for 1 and 2 individually. These observations eliminate the carbonyl groups as acting as bridges between the two iridium centers. Moreover, since the carbonyl stretching vibrations are sensitive to the iridium oxidation state, the data indicate that the individual iriditim ions have undergone only minor perturbations in forming 3. The data are inconsistent with the occurrence of a redox condensation to form a metal-metal-bonded Ir(I1) dimer.3 Consequently we propose a halo-bridged structure, either A or B for 3 with the iodo-bridged structure A favored. 3 must derive stability from some degree of charge transfer between the two metal complexes. ,co

c1,

+

(CH3C6H4NH2)2Ir2(CO)4cl2I2

wtiimn 1im1

Figure 1. The electronic spectra of (a) 0.75 mM (p-CH3C6H4NH2)Ir(C0)2CI; (b) 0.75 mM (p-CH3C6H4NH2)Ir(CO)2clI2; (c) 0.75 mM (p-CH3C6H4NH2)Ir(CO)2CI and 0.75 mM (p-CH3C6H4NHz)Ir(CO)+JI2. The solvent is dichloromethane throughout and the cell path length is 1.0 mm.

C H J C ~ H G N /I‘,co H~

I

(1)

3 with an equilibrium constant of 5000 ( f 3 0 0 ) and for 3 at 490 nm of 6000 (f300).The stability of 3 is solvent dependent. It forms in dichloromethane, chloroform, and benzene but does not form in acetone or acetonitrile. The adduct 3 may be isolated as fine green crystals” with a metallic reflectance. These may be obtained by addition of cyclohexane to a concentrated dichloromethane solution of equimolar amounts of 1 and 2 or by oxidizing 1 in dichloromethane solution with one half of a molar amount of iodine followed by crystallization through the addition of cyclohexane. The adduct 3 is diamagnetic and shows no electron spin resonance spectrum as a solid or in solution. The formation of 3 cannot be ascribed to a tendancy for 1 to add ligands indiscriminately. Treatment of 1 with iodide results in substitution of iodide for chloride, but a five-coor0002-7863/80/1502-l448$01 .OO/O

oc

I

‘IK

OC’j

,c1 ‘NH,C.H,CH.

I

,co

c1, ,IK,

CH.IC~HL,NHZ

I

co

i1

oc\Ir/I ’I ‘-NH~C~H+CH~

I

C 0

A -

B -

The behavior of these iridium complexes contrasts to the one other system so far described in which a d8 and d6 pair of complexes associate in solution. In that case reaction of Rh(CNR)4+ with Rh(CNR)412+ yields either Rh2(CNR)g12+2 or Rh3(CNR)12123+ both of which have metal-metal-bonded structure^.'^-'^ The factors which distinguish between halo-bridged and metal-metal-bonded structures in reactions of these types may relate to the intrinsic lability of the M-X bonds and they warrent further attention.

0 1980 American Chemical Society