Fossil and Nonfossil Sources of Organic and Elemental Carbon

Similar TSP sampling approaches (instead of finer cut-offs, such as PM2.5 or PM10) have been previously reported in South Asia and Northeast and East ...
0 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size
Subscriber access provided by Weizmann Institute of Science

Article

Fossil and Non-Fossil Sources of Organic and Elemental Carbon Aerosols in the Outflow from Northeast China Yanlin Zhang, Kimitaka Kawamura, Konstantinos Agrios, Meehye Lee, Gary Salazar, and Soenke Szidat Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b00351 • Publication Date (Web): 20 May 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 23, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 33

Environmental Science & Technology

1

1

Fossil and Non-Fossil Sources of Organic and Elemental Carbon Aerosols in the

2

Outflow from Northeast China

3

Yan-Lin Zhang1,2 ,*, Kimitaka Kawamura2,*, Konstantinos Agrios3,4, Meehye Lee5,

4

Gary Salazar3, Sönke Szidat3

5

1Yale-NUIST

6

Information Science and Technology, Nanjing10044, China

7

2Institute

8

Sapporo 060-0819, Japan

9

3

Center on Atmospheric Environment, Nanjing University of

of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, N19 W08, Kita-ku,

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry & Oeschger Centre for Climate Change

10

Research, University of Bern, Bern 3012, Switzerland

11

4

Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen-PSI 5232, Switzerland

12

5

Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Korea University, Seoul 136-701,

13

South Korea

14

*

15

[email protected]) or Kimitaka Kawamura

16

([email protected])

17

Phone: 81-11-706-5457; fax: 81-11-706-7142

Correspondence to: Yan-Lin Zhang ([email protected] or

18

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 2 of 33

2

19

Abstract

20

Source quantification of carbonaceous aerosols in the Chinese outflow regions still

21

remains uncertain despite their high mass concentrations. Here, we unambiguously

22

quantified fossil and non-fossil contributions to elemental carbon (EC) and organic

23

carbon (OC) of total suspended particles (TSP) from a regional receptor site in the

24

outflow of Northeast China using radiocarbon measurement. OC and EC

25

concentrations were lower in summer, representing mainly marine air, than in other

26

seasons, when air masses mostly travelled over continental regions in Mongolia and

27

Northeast China. The annual-mean contribution from fossil-fuel combustion to EC

28

was 76±11% (0.1-1.3 µg m-3). The remaining 24±11% (0.03-0.42 µg m-3) was

29

attributed to biomass burning with slightly higher contribution in the cold period

30

(~31%) compared to the warm period (~21%) because of enhanced emissions from

31

regional biomass combustion sources in China. OC was generally dominated by non-

32

fossil sources with an annual average of 66±11% (0.5-2.8 µg m-3), approximately half

33

of which was apportioned to primary biomass burning sources (34±6%). In winter,

34

OC almost equally originated from primary (POC) emissions and secondary OC

35

(SOC) formation from fossil fuel and biomass burning sources. By contrast,

36

summertime OC was dominated by primary biogenic emissions as well as secondary

37

production from biogenic and biomass burning sources, but fossil-derived SOC was

38

the smallest contributor. Distinction of POC and SOC was performed using primary

39

POC/EC emission ratios separated for fossil and non-fossil emissions.

40

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 33

Environmental Science & Technology

3

41

TOC

42

43

44 45

46

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 4 of 33

4

47

1 Introduction Carbonaceous aerosols contribute 10-70% to the atmospheric fine particulate

48

1, 2

49

matter

and have multiple and significant impacts on air quality, atmospheric

50

visibility, human health and the Earth’s climate 3-5. The total content of carbonaceous

51

aerosols (i.e., total carbon, TC) is operationally classified into two major fractions,

52

namely organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) or black carbon (BC) 6. OC

53

can be directly emitted as primary OC (POC) or formed as secondary OC (SOC) via

54

gas-particle conversion resulting from atmospheric oxidation of anthropogenic and

55

natural precursors 6, 7. OC can affect the Earth’s climate forcing by directly reflecting

56

incoming sunlight and indirectly by altering the ability of organic aerosols to act as

57

cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) 5. EC almost exclusively derives from incomplete

58

combustion of fossil fuel (e.g. coal and petroleum) or biomass 6, 8, leading overall to a

59

warming effect by either absorbing incoming solar radiation or by reducing the albedo

60

of the Earth’s surface (i.e., snow and ice) 5.

61

High mass concentrations of carbonaceous particles have been reported in the

62

outflow regions of Chinese pollutants, such as Japan and Korea, due to long-range

63

atmospheric transport

64

source regions of China often differ in their origins and formation processes, which

65

may complicate the source identification of aerosols from downwind areas. Therefore,

66

there is an urgent need to get a better understanding of the sources of OC and EC in

67

outflow regions of China. Radiocarbon (14C) analysis is a powerful and unambiguous

68

tool for quantitatively determining fossil versus non-fossil sources of carbonaceous

69

aerosols, especially if such analysis is conducted separately for different carbonaceous

70

fractions such as OC, EC and/or water-soluble OC (WSOC)

71

source apportionment study showed that fossil sources contribute on average 80% to

9-11

. Previous studies have also revealed that OC and EC in

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

12-14

. A recent 14C-based

Page 5 of 33

Environmental Science & Technology

5

72

EC at Gosan site, which is higher than suggested by bottom-up approaches due to less

73

constrains on emission ratios in various fuel types and combustion efficiencies

74

However, such source constraints are only limited to shorter campaigns or specific

75

seasons.

15

.

76

In this study, 14C measurement combined with the Latin-Hypercube Sampling

77

(LHS) model was applied to aerosol samples from an East Asian receptor site (Gosan

78

supersite at Jeju Island, Korea) in order to obtain fruitful information on regionally

79

integrated sources and formation processes of carbonaceous aerosols from China. To

80

the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that

81

was carried out on both EC and OC aerosols in East Asian continental outflow

82

regions, covering a full seasonal cycle.

14

C-based source apportionment

83

84

2 Experimental

85

2.1 Sampling

86

Field sampling was conducted at the Korea Climate Observatory at Gosan, an

87

East Asian Supersite (33.17°N, 126.10°E, see Figure 1), which is located on the

88

western edge of Jeju Island facing the Asian Continent (~100 km south of the Korean

89

Peninsula, ∼500 km east of China, ∼200 km west of Kyushu Island, Japan), and the

90

sampling site is far away from local residential areas of the island. This sampling site

91

has been used in several multinational projects for aerosol studies such as ABC

92

(Atmospheric Brown Clouds) Project

93

Experiment–Asia) project

94

Asian Continent 14, 17-19. Total suspended particles (TSP) were collected on preheated

16

10

and ACE-Asia (Aerosol Characterization

as a downwind site of air pollution outflow from the

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 6 of 33

6

95

(450 °C for at least 6 h) quartz fiber filters (20 cm × 25 cm, Pallflex) using a high

96

volume air sampler (Kimoto AS-810, ~65 m3 h−1) near-continuously from April 2013

97

to April 2014 on the roof of a trailer house (∼3 m above the ground). Similar TSP

98

sampling approaches (instead of finer cut-offs, such as PM2.5 or PM10) have been

99

previously reported in South Asia and Northeast/East Asia to assess the sources of 11, 14, 20, 21

100

carbonaceous particles in full size range

101

detection limits for microscale

102

fractions (see Sec 2.3), a sampling collection interval of 10-14 days was used. After

103

sampling, filters were put in a pre-combusted glass jar (150 mL) with a Teflon-lined

104

screw cap to avoid contaminations and stored in a dark freezer room at −20°C before

105

analysis. Three field blank filters were collected, shipped, stored and measured in the

106

same way as the samples.

107

2.2 Carbon Aerosol Mass Concentration

14

. To fulfill the requirement of

C measurements in different carbonaceous aerosol

108

Concentrations of OC and EC were measured by a thermal-optical

109

transmittance method with OC/EC Carbon Aerosol Analyzer (Sunset Laboratory Inc.

110

USA) following the NIOSH protocol

111

showed an analytical precision with relative standard deviations of 5.8%, 12.0%, and

112

6.0% for OC, EC and TC, respectively. All reported OC and TC were blank

113

subtracted using an average filter blank (1.8±1.0 µg cm-2; n = 3). The EC blank is

114

smaller than the limit of detection and thus blank correction of EC is not necessary.

115

2.3 Radiocarbon Analysis

116

22

. The triplicate analysis of samples (n = 8)

14

C of TC was measured by online coupling of an elemental analyzer with a

117

MIni CArbon Dating System (MICADAS) equipped with a gas ion source and a

118

versatile gas interface

23

at University of Bern, Switzerland 24, as described in detail

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 33

Environmental Science & Technology

7 25

119

elsewhere

. In order to remove carbonate carbon, the filters were exposed to HCl

120

fuming in a desiccator overnight (~12 hours). 14C analysis of EC was carried out by

121

online coupling the MICADAS with a Sunset Lab OC/EC analyzer where OC was

122

removed from the filter sample (1.5 cm2) by thermal-optical Swiss_4S protocol 26 and

123

CO2 evolved from the EC peak is subsequently separated 27. 14

C results were expressed as fractions of modern (fM), i.e., the fraction of the

124 125

14

C/12C ratio of the sample related to that of the reference year 1950

28

126

each sample was further corrected by EC loss (30±8% on the average) during the OC

127

removal steps and possibly positive EC artifact from OC charring (10±6% of EC on

128

the average) as described by

129

of the initial attenuation (ATN) as monitored by the laser signal of the (OC/EC)

130

analyzer and the ATN before isolating EC for

131

Charring of OC relative to EC is estimated for each thermal step as the difference of

132

the max. ATN and the initial ATN normalized to the initial ATN assuming that

133

50%±15% of the charred OC is co-evolved in the EC step. The determination of EC

134

yield and charred OC from the laser signal was conservatively assigned with a relative

135

uncertainty of 33%, which resulted in an overall uncertainty of fM(EC) of 4% on the

136

average from correction for these parameters based on error propagation. fM(TC) was

137

corrected for field blanks.

138

according to an isotope mass balance 13.

. fM(EC) for

26, 29

. For each sample, the EC yield is quantified as ratio

14

14

C measurement (i.e., EC step).

C results in OC (fM(OC)) were calculated indirectly

139

Non-fossil fractions of OC and EC (i.e., fNF(OC) and fNF(EC), respectively)

140

were determined from their corresponding fM values and reference values for pure

141

non-fossil sources by fNF=fM(sample)/fM(REF). These reference values are estimated

142

as 1.07±0.04 and 1.10±0.05 for OC and EC, respectively by a tree-growth model with

143

a long term 14CO2 measurement

30

and by assuming biomass burning contribution to

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 8 of 33

8

144

non-fossil OC and EC is 50% and 100%, respectively. The fraction of fossil-fuel

145

sources was calculated by: fFF=1-fNF. Uncertainties were determined by error

146

propagation of all individual uncertainties including mass determination in OC and

147

EC,

148

field blanks, EC recovery and charring. The overall uncertainties of fNF were

149

estimated to be on average 4% (i.e., ranging from 3% to 5%) for OC and 7% (i.e.,

150

ranging from 3% to 10%) for EC, and the most important contribution to their

151

uncertainties were generally from blank corrections and EC yield corrections for OC

152

and EC, respectively.

153

2.4 Back Trajectory Analysis

14

C results in OC and EC, reference values (fM(REF)) as well as corrections for

154

Five-day back trajectories were calculated every 6 h for the entire campaign

155

period using the HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory)

156

Model

157

(http://ready.arl.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php). All individual trajectories were then

158

clustered into 3 or 4 clusters for each season using HYSPLIT to provide seasonal

159

specific information about major air mass origins. The seasonal variation of back

160

trajectories was clearly characterized with the summertime air masses mostly

161

originating from the ocean and in other seasons from continental regions in Northeast

162

China and Mongolia (Figure 1).

163

3 Results and Discussion

164

3.1 Overview of OC and EC Concentrations

access

provided

by

NOAA

ARL

READY

Website

165

The mass concentrations of OC and EC ranged from 0.6 to 4.1 µg m-3 and 0.2

166

to 1.5 µg m-3, with a mean value of 2.2±1.0 µg m-3 and 0.7±0.4 µg m-3, respectively

167

(Figure 2). OC and EC mass concentrations were similar to or lower than those

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 33

Environmental Science & Technology

9

168

reported at the same site during spring and fall of 2008-2012 (excluding 2010, 3.3 µg

169

m-3 for OC and 0.7 µg m-3 for EC) 31 and the ACE-Asia program during the spring of

170

2011 (7.00 µg m-3 for OC and 1.29 µg m-3 for EC) 32; however, our results were also

171

much higher than those from remote sites in the North Pacific Ocean (