Fugacity-Based Indoor Residential Pesticide Fate Model

Technol. , 2004, 38 (18), pp 4912–4912. DOI: 10.1021/es040478t. Publication Date (Web): August 18, 2004. Copyright © 2004 American Chemical Society...
1 downloads 0 Views 16KB Size
2004, Volume 38, Pages 2142-2152 Deborah H. Bennett* and Edwin J. Furtaw, Jr.: Fugacity-Based Indoor Residential Pesticide Fate Model Page 2145. In Table 3, Fap was not defined. It is the particle mass density (kg/m3) and is the same parameter as Fd, but unfortunately the terminology was not consistent throughout the paper. There was also an inconsistency in defining the thickness of various surfaces. In some cases, the symbol dj was used, while in others the symbol δj was used. Both symbols refer to the thickness of material j. We want to clarify that the equations for deposition and resuspension should be summed for all the size fractions. We also note that the resuspension velocities from carpet and vinyl should both be represented by simply vr. Page 2146. In eq 20, the subscript in the denominator was

(

flux ) ks Cair -

) (

)

Ma Mj M ) ks ) Keq Va AZjδjRcTm ks Mj Ma (23) RcTm hAZair δjAZj

(

)

typed incorrect and should be dc. Page 2148. Equation 23 contains a typographical error. It should be as follows: The equation is the same as eq 5 in the Supporting Information, where it was listed correctly. ES040478T 10.1021/es040478t

4912

9

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY / VOL. 38, NO. 18, 2004

10.1021/es040478t CCC: $27.50

 2004 American Chemical Society Published on Web 08/18/2004