Fully Written Flexible Potentiometric Sensor Using ... - ACS Publications

Oct 16, 2018 - Inspired by daily hand-writing, an all-written potentiometric sensor was developed by using a Chinese brush pen-based writing technique...
0 downloads 0 Views 870KB Size
Subscriber access provided by Kaohsiung Medical University

Article

Fully Written Flexible Potentiometric Sensor Using Two-dimensional Nanomaterial-based Conductive Ink Chengmei Jiang, Xunjia Li, Yao Yao, Yibin Ying, and Jianfeng Ping Anal. Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b04334 • Publication Date (Web): 16 Oct 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on October 18, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Analytical Chemistry

1

Fully Written Flexible Potentiometric Sensor Using Two-dimensional

2

Nanomaterial-based Conductive Ink

3

Chengmei Jiang, Xunjia Li, Yao Yao, Yibin Ying, Jianfeng Ping*

4

School of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Road,

5

Hangzhou 310058, P.R. China

6

Corresponding author: Prof. Jianfeng Ping

7

E-mail: [email protected]

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Analytical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

9

Abstract: The emerging demand for flexible, portable, easily accessible, and cost-effective electronic

10

fabrication has motivated to develop novel techniques to manufacture electronic components and

11

devices. Inspired by daily hand-writing, an all-written potentiometric sensor was developed by using a

12

Chinese brush pen-based writing technique. A writing ink made from graphene nanosheet (GN) as a

13

conductive component, Triton x-100 as a stabilizer, and xanthan gum as a binder, was used to obtain

14

flexible electrode substrate. Results demonstrate GN ink-based writing electrode (GN-WE) possesses

15

good conductivity, fast electron transfer kinetics, considerable stability, and favorable flexibility. By

16

further writing cadmium ion selective membrane (Cd2+-ISM) and photo-polymerised reference

17

membrane (RM) on the surface of GN-WE, an all-solid-state potentiometric sensor for cadmium ion

18

was constructed. A large bulk capacitance (41.67 μF) and excellent potential stability (drift of 0.156 mV

19

h–1) was achieved at the developed all-written potentiometric sensor, which is much superior to the

20

solid-contact potentiometric sensor using GCE as electrode substrate. Furthermore, real sample analysis

21

reveals that our GN ink-based potentiometric sensor could be used as a reliable and stable sensor for

22

cadmium ion detection in food and environment.

23

Keywords: Graphene ink, Chinese writing brush, Ion selective electrode, Potentiometry, Heavy metal

2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 26

Page 3 of 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Analytical Chemistry

25

INTRODUCTION

26

Inspired by routine hand writing, multiple writing tools, such as pencil, brush pen, ball pen, and

27

fountain pen have been recently utilized to directly write electronics. As a traditional Chinese writing

28

and painting instrument and shaped like the painbrush in oil painting in the western countries, the brush

29

pen is invented in China long time ago before Christ, and has been utilized as the main writing tool in

30

eastern countries for thousands of years.1 A typical brush pen is constructed through a combination of a

31

bunch of filaments (e.g., bristle, nylon fibrils) with a head of handle (e.g., bamboo, wood). During the

32

process of writing, the brush pen is initially soaked in an ink container, following handwriting pressure,

33

the ink is transferred onto a substrate. Specifically, the capillary shear and stress force from the brush

34

deliver the ink onto the substrate to form continuous pattern. This writing technique possesses

35

tremendous merits, i.e. it is capable of achieving writing on various substrates of both soft and rigid, for

36

example, some flexible substrates like polyethylene terephthalate (PET) membrane, even utilizing

37

human skin as a substrate to real-time monitor human physiological indicators.2 Nowadays there is a

38

great interest in developing flexible electronics, since the wearable functional devices, medical

39

monitoring systems, and flexible energy storage and conversion devices are appearing to be the research

40

hotspots, which hold great promise to empower doctors to timely monitor vital signs of patients simply

41

and efficiently.3-4 Moreover, the convenient writing fabrication strategy can construct electronics with

42

decreased cost, increased performance, rapidity, and easy accessibility.5

43

As for the writing ink, graphite powder (GP) is always used as the main component of the

44

traditional ink, and its extensive use is restricted due to its poor conductivity. Thus, tremendous efforts

45

have been conducted to improve the conductivity of writing ink. For this, diverse nanomaterials, such

46

as the Ag nanoparticles,6 Cu nanoparticles,7 and carbon nanotubes,8 have been introduced to fabricate

47

the conductive ink for writing electronics, since their remarkable characteristics including high surface

48

area to volume ratio and superior electrical conductivity.9 Graphene nanosheet (GN), as the most notable

49

two-dimensional nanomaterial, has received considerable attention due to its outstanding electrical,

50

mechanical, and thermal properties.10-12 In the past decades, GN has exhibited great promising in various

51

fields, such as electronics, chemical and biological sensors, energy-storage devices, catalysts, and etc.13 3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Analytical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

52

Meanwhile, the high carrier mobility at room temperature, high Young’s modulus, and excellent thermal

53

conductivity of GN motivates researchers to explore GN-based conductive ink. To date, GN-based

54

conductive ink has been produced successfully for various applications in electronic components and

55

circuits.14 Extensively, a multitude of additional materials are incorporated within GN-based inks to

56

apply in sensors, conductive patterns, and supercapacitors. For example, Karim et al. reported an ink

57

made from functionalized organic nanoparticles and GN for wearable e-textile applications.15 Hassan et

58

al. demonstrated an inkjet-printed humidity sensor based on graphene and zinc oxide nanocomposite

59

ink.16 Wu et al. constructed an ammonia gas sensor utilizing a hybrid ink made by doping commercial

60

nano-silver ink with GN.17 All these demonstrate that the GN-based conductive ink is a promising

61

substitute for traditional metallic ink. However, the combination of writing technique and GN-based

62

conductive ink to explore flexible sensing devices has not been reported yet.

63

Potentiometry, as one of the most portable and common electrochemical techniques, has

64

traditionally exhibited an unrivalled simplicity of instrumentation and operation.18-19 Therefore, it is still

65

one of the workhorses in clinical laboratories and almost the universal method to measure pH in various

66

practical conditions.20 Ion selective electrodes (ISEs) as one kind of typical potentiometric sensors are

67

widely used in environmental monitoring, industrial analysis, and medical diagnosis on account of their

68

tremendous advantages including simple analytical procedure, rapid response, and relatively low cost.4,

69

21-22

70

casting the electrode substrate with membrane solution, bringing great improvements to the detection

71

sensitivity, and extending the application range, as well as simplifying the structure, operating mode,

72

and maintaining of sensors.23 Notwithstanding, the poor ion-to-electron transduction between the

73

electronic conductor and the ionically conducting ion-selective membrane (ISM) along with the

74

formation of water layer at the interface may cause the potential instability and irreproducibility. To

75

solve these problems, diversified intermediate solid contacts are introduced, such as conducting

76

polymers (polypyrrole and polyaniline),24-26 carbon nanomaterials (carbon nanotubes, GN, fullerene,

77

and ordered macroporous carbon),27-30 metal nanomaterials (gold nanoclusters, platinum nanoparticles,

78

and silver nanoparticles),31-34 and etc. Under continuous efforts, the state-of-art of ASS-ISEs have

Particularly, the rapid development of all-solid-state ISEs (ASS-ISEs) in recent years by directly

4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 26

Page 5 of 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Analytical Chemistry

79

reached superior performances with improved internal stability, outstanding resistance to redox

80

interferents, light, as well as soluble oxygen. However, most of ASS-ISEs are made from glassy carbon

81

electrode (GCE) and metallic electrode as electrode substrates, which are lack of flexibility, generally

82

incapable to meet the emerging demand for flexible electronics. Therefore, the search of flexible

83

electrode substrates with effective ion-to-electron transduction and easy fabrication for potentiometric

84

sensors is still a big challenge.

85

In this work, we combined the writing technique and GN-based conductive ink to fabricate a

86

flexible all-written potentiometric sensor. The GN-based ink was mainly composed of GN as conductive

87

component, a non-ionic surfactant of Triton x-100 as a stabilizer to avoid disrupting the electrostatic

88

stabilization of GN, and a water-soluble polysaccharide of xanthan gum as a binder to increase the

89

viscosity of the ink.35 The fabrication of GN ink-based writing electrode (denoted as GN-WE) was

90

performed using a brush pen. In order to fabricate a potentiometric sensor, ion selective membrane (ISM)

91

and reference membrane (RM) was then coated on the surface of two flexible GN-WEs (Scheme 1)

92

successively through writing with a brush pen. Here, we selected cadmium ion selective membrane

93

(denoted as Cd2+-ISM) as a model, since Cd2+ has undesirable effects on the kidney, liver, skin, bone,

94

and teeth, it can accumulate and store in living organisms that may lead to cancer.36-38 Results

95

demonstrate the obtained flexible all-written potentiometric sensor, i.e. Cd2+-ISM coated GN-WE

96

(denoted as GN-WE/Cd2+-ISM) and RM coated GN-WE (denoted as GN-WE/RM), possesses good

97

potential stability, high sensitivity, and short response time, which is superior to the traditional solid-

98

contact potentiometric sensor (i.e. saturated Ag/AgCl electrode and Cd2+-ISM coated GCE, denoted as

99

GCE/Cd2+-ISM) and GP ink-based potentiometric sensor (i.e. saturated Ag/AgCl electrode and Cd2+-

100

ISM coated GP ink-based writing electrode, denoted as GP-WE/Cd2+-ISM).

101

MATERIALS AND METHODS

102

Reagents. All the chemicals were of analytical grade and were used as received. Graphene water

103

slurry (thickness of 3-10 nm, size of 5-10 µm) with its solid content of 5.0 wt% was purchased from

104

XFNANO Materials Tech Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). Triton x-100, xanthan gum, potassium

105

tetrakis[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate (KTFPB), poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC), cadmium 5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Analytical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

106

ionophore I (N,N,N′,N′-tetrabutyl-3,6-dioxaoctane-dithioamide, ETH 1062),39 tetrahydrofuran (THF),

107

2-nitrophenyl octyl ether (NPOE), n-butyl arylate (monomer), 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone

108

(photoinitiator), 1,6-hexanediol diacrylate (cross-linker), and ETH 500 were obtained from Sigma-

109

Aldrich. Graphite powder with a ≤30 µm particle size (≥99.85%), KCl as well as nitrites including

110

Pb(NO3)2, Ca(NO3)2, Cd(NO3)2, Zn(NO3)2, Mg(NO3)2, Ni(NO3)2, Cu(NO3)2, Co(NO3)2, and AgNO3,

111

were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The deionized water

112

was employed to prepare all the aqueous solution.

113

Preparation of GN-based Ink and GP-based Ink. The Triton x-100, a non-ionic surfactant, was

114

chosen to stabilize the GN or GP suspensions. The xanthan gum, a water-soluble polysaccharide, was

115

selected to act as a binder that can be utilized to increase the viscosity of the ink.35 The GN-based ink

116

consisted of 1:1.7:133 Triton x-100:xanthan gum:GN by mass was prepared by ultrasonication for half

117

an hour. The preparation of GP-based ink was the same as the used method as above.

118

Fabrication of All-written Potentiometric Sensor. As illustrated in Scheme 1, for preparation of

119

the writing electrode, firstly, the brush pen was soaked into the GN-based or GP-based ink before writing

120

on the PET membrane. There is a shear stress applied on the solution existing between the two

121

boundaries, i.e. the solution-substrate and the solution-brush interfaces during writing process. After the

122

ink dried at room temperature, a slight pressing is applied on the GN-based electrode or GP-based

123

electrode. In addition, the thickness of GN or GP electrodes can be adjusted by the number of writing

124

cycles (writing once with the brush pen soaked in ink is defined as one-cycle writing, once again to dip

125

the brush pen in ink and then repeat the writing on the original handwriting trace, then achieving two-

126

cycles writing, note that each cycle writing uses the same force), it is optimized to three writing cycles

127

(the thickness of GN-WE is about 100 µm). The size of electrode is approximately 6 mm × 20 mm, a

128

sensing part with a size of 6 mm × 5 mm and an electrical conducting area with a scale of 6 mm × 5 mm

129

were obtained at both ends of electrode, the middle part is covered with plastic mask in order to prohibit

130

contacting with water during test.

131

To prepare the Cd2+-ISM, 1.0 mg of cadmium ionophore ETH 1062, 65.8 mg of NPOE, 0.2 mg of

132

KTFPB, and 33.0 mg of PVC were added into 1.0 mL of organic solvent (THF). The obtained mixture 6

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 26

Page 7 of 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Analytical Chemistry

133

was then sonicated for 30 min. For RM, it consists of 13 mg of AgCl (obtained by mixing 3.0 M AgNO3

134

and 3.0 M KCl solutions, vacuum drying oven evaporates moisture), 152.4 mg of 2,2-dimethoxy-2-

135

phenylacetophenone (as photoinitiator), 20 µL of cross-linking mixture (cross-linking mixture made up

136

of 14.2 mg of 1,6-hexanediol diacrylate (as cross-linker) and 1.1 mL of n-butyl acrylate (monomer)),

137

34 mg of KCl, 180 µL of n-butyl acrylate, and 5 mg of ETH 500.4 To fabricate the flexible cadmium

138

ion selective electrode (Cd2+-ISE), the Cd2+-ISM solution was directly written on the surface of sensing

139

part of GN or GP based-electrode utilizing a brush pen, and the GCE/Cd2+-ISM was prepared by drop-

140

casting the Cd2+-ISM solution onto the bare GCE. As for the reference electrode (RE, i.e. GN-WE/RM),

141

we also used writing method to cover over the GN-WE with RM, then an ultraviolet lamp (~4 W,

142

spanning wavelengths: 320-440 nm) was used for photopolymerization for 5 min under argon flow.

143

After that, all the fabricated Cd2+-ISEs were left to evaporate the organic solvent overnight at 25 ± 1ºC.

144

Prior to the test in sample solutions, these Cd2+-ISEs should be soaked in 10–3 M Cd(NO3)2 aqueous

145

solution for 12 h and finally conditioned for about 24 h by soaking in an aqueous solution containing

146

10–4 M Cd(NO3)2, 10–2 M NaNO3, and 10–3 M Na2EDTA, and for the GN-WE/RM, we conditioned it

147

in 0.1 M KCl aqueous solution for more than 24 h.

148

Characterization. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were collected on a Zeiss Ultra-

149

55 field emission scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Germany). Raman spectra was

150

carried out by a LabRAM HR Evolution Raman microscope system (Horiba Jobin Yvon). A He-Ne

151

laser (632.8 nm) was used for excitation. The film resistance was optimized on a ST2263 Double testing

152

digital four-probe tester using a four-point-probe method.

153

Measurement of Electromotive Force. The potentiometry tests were conducted with a portable

154

PalmSens instrument (Palm Instrument BV, Houten) which connects to a palmtop PC by means of an

155

embedded wireless bluetooth module. A two-electrode system was used for the measurements of

156

electromotive force (EMF), whereas the fabricated Cd2+-ISE was employed as working electrode, the

157

GN-WE/RM was used as RE coupled with GN-WE/Cd2+-ISM to compose an all-written potentiometric

158

sensor. For GP-WE/Cd2+-ISM and GCE/Cd2+-ISM, the RE of a saturated Ag/AgCl electrode (3.3 M

159

KCl solution) was adopted. All the potentiometric tests were operated at room temperature (25 ± 1ºC). 7

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Analytical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

160

Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy and Chronopotentiometry Measurements. A

161

Solartron Analytical model 1260 Impedance-Gain-Phase Analyzer coordinated with a model 1287

162

Electrochemical Interface (Solartron Analytical, Farnborough, UK) were used to perform the

163

electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) experiments. The parameters of EIS measurements were

164

as follows: DC potential is 0 mV, AC amplitude is 50 mV, and scan frequency ranges from 900 kHz to

165

1.0 Hz. Chronopotentiometric studies were performed with a CHI 760E Electrochemical Workstation

166

(CH Instruments, USA). A constant current of +1 nA was applied on the Cd2+-ISEs last for 100 s and

167

subsequently a constant current of -1 nA was immediately applied on the Cd2+-ISEs with 100 s, the

168

potential was recorded as a function of time. Both of the two experiments were performed with the

169

traditional three-electrode system, in which the reference electrode was served by GN-WE/RM (for GN-

170

WE/Cd2+-ISM) or a saturated Ag/AgCl electrode (3.3 M KCl solution) (for GCE/Cd2+-ISM or GP-

171

WE/Cd2+-ISM), the fabricated Cd2+-ISE was used as working electrode, and a platinum wire was

172

employed as counter electrode.

173

Real Sample Application. Lake water is used as a typical representative of water for sample test.

174

The collected samples were filtered using a disposable needle filter (Sigma-Aldrich), in which the pore

175

size is 0.45 μm and the diameter of filter is 13 mm. The recovery test was used to estimate the practical

176

applicability of the fabricated GN ink-based all-written potentiometric sensor in real samples. In

177

addition, the Cd2+ levels in lake water samples were also detected by inductively coupled plasma mass

178

spectrometry (ICP-MS) machine (ELAN DRC-e, PekinElmer, USA).

179

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

180

Characterization of GN-WE. The fabricated GN-WE was firstly characterized by SEM and

181

Raman spectra. The SEM images were applied to observe the morphology of the surface and cross-

182

section of our prepared electrode. As shown in Figure 1A, a flat surface is observed resulting from the

183

applied pressing during the electrode fabrication process, and the cross-section image of GN-WE

184

(Figure 1B) reveals that GN-WE has a clearly layer-by-layer structure, demonstrating that the pressure

185

applied on the electrode did not destroy the layered structure of GN. It is notable that the thickness of

186

writing electrode can be adjusted by altering the writing cycles. Furthermore, the crystal structure of the 8

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 26

Page 9 of 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Analytical Chemistry

187

as-prepared GN-WE was investigated by Raman spectra measurement. As shown in Figure 1C, the

188

obtained Raman spectra of different positions on electrode are almost identical, suggesting a uniform

189

structure of GN-WE. Moreover, two prominent peaks at 1335 and 1581 cm–1 are observed in the

190

spectrum of GN-WE, corresponding to the well-documented D and G bands, respectively. This Raman

191

spectrum is the same as that of GN,4 indicating that the writing and pressing processes did not break the

192

crystal lattice of GN sheets.

193

To optimize the writing cycle of GN-WE, we adopted five GN-WEs of different thickness with

194

writing one-cycle, two-cycles, three-cycles, four-cycles, and five-cycles separately. As shown in Figure

195

S1 (Supporting Information), the film thickness increased from 31 μm to 182 μm with the increase of

196

writing cycles. While the square resistance reduces with the increase of writing cycles (Figure 1D),

197

indicating the conductivity of GN-WE can be enhanced by increasing the writing cycles. In view of the

198

synthesized factors including flexibility and conductivity (proper thickness will improve the

199

conductivity, but too thick will affect its flexibility), three-cycles was selected as the ultimate writing

200

condition, and the thickness (~100 µm) of GN-WE obtained from three-cycles writing condition was

201

confirmed by the entire cross-section image of SEM (Figure S1).

202

In order to demonstrate the mechanical flexibility of GN-WE, we measured the electrical resistance

203

of GN-WE before and after various bending angles (30°, 60°, and 90°) and cycles (10, 20, 50, and 100)

204

utilizing the four-point-probe method. As shown in Figure 2A, there is no obvious fluctuation of the

205

square resistance values after a series of bending cycles, indicating a favorable flexibility of GN-WE.

206

To further investigate the conductivity and flexibility of the GN-based conductive ink writing trace on

207

different substrates, we used the light-emitting diode (LED) to demonstrate. As illustrated in Figure

208

2C, the handwriting of word ‘ZJU’ on a cellulose paper can form an electrical pathway. Moreover, the

209

brightness of LED was not influenced by the mechanical stress when using PET as substrate (Figure

210

2D). The ability withstand mechanical stress like bending is an attractive property that allows longer

211

lifetime of the sensor.

212

EIS was applied to investigate the electron transfer kinetics of a redox probe at the developed GN-

213

WE, GCE, and GP-WE. As illustrated in Figure S2 (Supporting Information), a high-frequency 9

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Analytical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

214

semicircle was observed in all EIS curves of these three electrodes. The charge transfer resistance (Rct)

215

value for the [Fe(CN)6]3–/4– redox probe is computed by measuring the diameter of the high frequency

216

semicircle in the Nyquist plots. By fitting the data using the equivalent circuit (inset of Figure S2), the

217

value of Rct (~131 ± 10.8 Ω) for GN-WE is similar to that (~133 ± 2.1 Ω) obtained at GCE, which is

218

much smaller than that of GP-WE (~380 ± 4.7 Ω).

219

Potentiometric Performance of GN Ink-based All-written Potentiometric Sensor. The

220

potentiometric characterizations of GN-WE/Cd2+-ISM coupled with GN-WE/RM were performed by

221

recording the EMF value as a function of time with gradually increased concentrations of Cd2+, for

222

comparison, the GP-WE/Cd2+-ISM and GCE/Cd2+-ISM were measured as well. The sensitivity and

223

linear range of GN-WE/Cd2+-ISM were shown in the dynamic curve (Figure 3A) of EMF value

224

recorded for increasing the concentration of Cd2+ in the solution and the corresponding calibration

225

curves (Figure 3B). After each addition, no obvious perturbations or random noise can be seen,

226

indicating the Cd2+ sensor works well. The response of GN-WE/Cd2+-ISM was almost Nernstian

227

exhibiting a slope of 28.57 mV/decade (standard deviation was 0.18 mV/decade, R2 = 0.9992) with a

228

linear range from 10−6 to 10−2.5 M (Figure 3B), the detection limit of GN-WE/Cd2+-ISM was about

229

10−6.5 M. In contrast, the control groups of GP-WE/Cd2+-ISM (Figure S3, Supporting Information)

230

and GCE/Cd2+-ISM (Figure S4, Supporting Information) exhibited linear ranges of 10−5.5-10−3 M and

231

10−6-10−2 M of Cd2+, respectively, and the slopes of calibration curves were calculated to be 27.26 ±

232

0.96 mV/decade (R2 = 0.9950) for GP-WE/Cd2+-ISM and 25.95 ± 0.65 mV/decade (R2 =0.99504) for

233

GCE/Cd2+-ISM. The detection limits of GP-WE/Cd2+-ISM and GCE/Cd2+-ISM were 10−6.0 and 10−6.2

234

M, respectively, which were calculated as the intersection of two slope lines in Figure S3B and Figure

235

S4B. Furthermore, the response time of GN-WE/Cd2+-ISM was about 10 s at low concentrations (inset

236

in Figure 3A), which was faster than that of GP-WE/Cd2+-ISM (inset in Figure S3A) (~26 s) and

237

GCE/Cd2+-ISM (inset in Figure S4A) (~22 s). All above indicate that GN-WE/Cd2+-ISM owns a better

238

analytical performance, which is ascribed to the higher ionic signal transfer efficiency of GN substrate

239

than GP and GC substrates. In addition, the reproducibility of the GN ink-based potentiometric sensor

240

was evaluated by measuring the Nernstian slope and the EMF value in Cd(NO3)2 aqueous solution (10–5 10

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 10 of 26

Page 11 of 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Analytical Chemistry

241

M) of five sensors fabricated under the same conditions. As illustrated in Figure S5 (Supporting

242

Information), the Nernstian slope and potential value of a certain concentration almost maintain steady.

243

Since selectivity is a crucial factor when developing systems for the analysis of Cd2+ in real samples,

244

herein the potentiometric selectivity coefficients defined by its relative response for the primary ion over

245

the other ions present in the solution were calculated for five divalent interferences (Ni2+, Ca2+, Co2+,

246

Zn2+, and Mg2+) using the separate solution method (SSM). As summarized in Table 1, the GN-

247

WE/Cd2+-ISM exhibits large value of selectivity coefficients towards various interferential metal ions.

248

These results are in good agreement with those obtained at the ISE using GCE as substrate (Table 1).

249

All these demonstrate that the selectivity of these prepared Cd2+-ISEs are solely dependent on the Cd2+-

250

ISM while show no relationship with the supporting substrates. To further investigate the flexibility of

251

the fabricated all-written potentiometric sensor, the EMF values of GN-WE/Cd2+-ISM before and after

252

bending were observed. As shown in Figure 2A, the EMF values of GN-WE/Cd2+-ISM keep constant

253

on the whole bending processes, and the bending angle of GN-based all-written potentiometric sensor

254

can keep around 90° for different bending cycles (Figure 2B).

255

To further evaluate the performance of the GN ink-based sensor, chronopotentiometry, water layer

256

test, and EIS were successively studied in detail. Chronopotentiometry and water layer test were

257

employed to evaluate short-time and long-term stability of GN ink-based writing potentiometric sensor.

258

Typical chronopotentiograms obtained at GN-WE/Cd2+-ISM and GCE/Cd2+-ISM were presented in

259

Figure 4A, that is, the potential response in Cd(NO3)2 aqueous solution (10‒3 M) was recorded as a

260

function of time with applying a constant current of +1 nA and subsequently a reverse current at ‒1 nA

261

lasting for a same interval of 100 s. When a reversed current was applying, the potential was jumping

262

immediately, according to Ohm’s law R = E/I, the total resistance of Cd2+-ISE can be calculated on basis

263

of the potential jump. For GN-WE/Cd2+-ISM (Figure 4A), the estimated overall resistance was 1.07

264

MΩ, and its short-term stability of 0.024 mV s–1 can be derived from the ratio ΔE/Δt, which is much

265

lower than the calculated potential drift value (0.54 mV s–1) of GCE/Cd2+-ISM over the running time.

266

Furthermore, according to the fundamental capacitor equation, i.e. I = C×dE/dt, the capacitance (C)

267

value was calculated as 41.67 μF for GN-WE/Cd2+-ISM, which is much higher than that (1.85 μF) 11

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Analytical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

268

obtained at the GCE/Cd2+-ISM.

269

The water layer test was performed to distinguish the existence of hypothetical thin water layer,

270

which could produce a severe effect on the potentiometric response of ASS-ISEs. The water layer test

271

conducted on electrochemical workstation is consist of measuring the corresponding potential value of

272

the electrode as an initial solution of the primary ion (10‒3 M Cd2+) altered for another solution of the

273

interfering ion (10‒3 M Na+), and then changed again for the initial solution (10‒3 M Cd2+). As illustrated

274

in Figure 4B, there is no obvious potential shift as the electrode is placed in order in 10‒3 M Cd2+, 10‒3

275

M Na+, and 10‒3 M Cd2+ solution for GN-WE/Cd2+-ISM, indicating the absence of water layer, which

276

can be ascribed to the hydrophobicity of the GN. Nevertheless, a slightly upward drift is observed for

277

GCE/Cd2+-ISM, as a result of the presence of water layer between the Cd2+-ISM and GCE substrate.

278

Additionally, we used the response potential measured at the last part of the water layer experiment to

279

evaluate long-term stability of GN-WE/Cd2+-ISM and GCE/Cd2+-ISM. As expected, a low drift of 0.156

280

mV h‒1 was obtained for the potential signal of GN-WE/Cd2+-ISM, which is much lower than that

281

obtained from GCE/Cd2+-ISM (0.715 mV h‒1), indicating the superior long-term stability of GN ink-

282

based all-written potentiometric sensor.

283

Moreover, impedance measurements of GCE/Cd2+-ISM and GN-WE/Cd2+-ISM were also

284

conducted and the obtained results are shown in Figure 5. The combination of bulk membrane resistance

285

and the contact resistance between the electrode substrate and the coated membrane equals the diameter

286

value of the semicircle in the high-frequency part. According to the fitted data in Figure 5, we found

287

that the integrated resistance value of GN-WE/Cd2+-ISM (~1.0 MΩ) is much smaller than that obtained

288

at GCE/Cd2+-ISM (~11.2 MΩ). The potential reason for the small resistance value at GN-WE/Cd2+-ISM

289

may be attributed to the rapid charge transfer kinetics, resulting from the excellent electronic conductive

290

and larger double-layer capacitive characteristics of the GN substrate that facilitate the charge transport

291

across the interfaces. All these demonstrate that the GN-WE can serve as an effective ion-to-electron

292

transducer that transfers ion signal of membrane into electron signal of electrode.

293

Real Sample Detection. To estimate the practical applicability of the fabricated GN ink-based all-

294

written potentiometric sensor, we adopted three river water samples for recovery test. The test was 12

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 12 of 26

Page 13 of 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Analytical Chemistry

295

performed as following: the negligible Cd2+ concentration of 1.357 nM, 0.4402 nM, and 0.1642 nM for

296

three original lake water samples were firstly confirmed by ICP-MS. Then, 10 mL of the above water

297

samples were added with 10 μL of 1.0×10−2 M, 1.0×10−1 M, and 1.0 M Cd(NO3)2 aqueous solutions to

298

give final Cd2+ concentrations of 1.0×10−5 M, 1.0×10−4 M, and 1.0×10−3 M, respectively, which were

299

used for the further potentiometric measurement performed on our fabricated GN-WE/Cd2+-ISM.

300

Finally, the standard curve was constructed by recording the potential response as a function of the Cd2+

301

concentrations, which was utilized for the following analysis. For the purpose of evaluating the recovery

302

of the added concentration, 10 mL of water samples with a Cd2+ concentration of 10−5 M (added 10 μL

303

of 1.0×10−2 M Cd(NO3)2 aqueous solution) were adopted to detect the potential response. As

304

summarized in Table 2, the GN ink-based writing potentiometric sensor possesses comparable recovery

305

result with an average recovery value of 98.13%. All these demonstrate that our GN ink-based all-

306

written potentiometric sensor provides a promising alternative for rapid detection of Cd2+ in real samples.

307

CONCLUSIONS

308

In this work, a low-cost but high-performance flexible all-written potentiometric sensing device

309

was fabricated by utilizing GN-based conductive ink and brush pen-based writing technique. Results

310

show that our all-written potentiometric sensor exhibits a Nernstian response to Cd2+ with a low

311

detection limit of 10−6.5 M, fast response time (~10 s), and relative stability, which is much superior to

312

the solid-contact potentiometric sensor using GCE as electrode substrate and GP ink-based writing

313

potentiometric sensor. Furthermore, our developed all-written potentiometric sensing device can be a

314

reliable and stable Cd2+ sensor in real sample analysis. This work provides a useful avenue for using

315

brush pen-based writing technique to directly paint functional materials on flexible substrate as a new

316

generation of flexible electrode for potentiometric sensors in heavy metal ion sensing, which possesses

317

broad prospects for implementing electrochemical sensing devices into the area of agriculture and food

318

safety detection.

319

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

320

Supporting Information

321

Five figures showing the relationship between writing cycle and thickness of GN-WE, impedance 13

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Analytical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

322

plots for GCE, GN-WE, and GP-WE in 0.1 M KCl aqueous solution containing 5.0 mM

323

K3[Fe(CN)6]/K4[Fe(CN)6] (molar ratio is 1:1), potentiometric performance of GP-WE/Cd2+-ISM,

324

potentiometric performance of GCE/Cd2+-ISM, and potentiometric response of a certain

325

concentration (10–5 M) and Nernstian slope for five GN ink-based all-written potentiometric sensors.

326

AUTHOR INFORMATION

327

Corresponding Author

328

*E-mail: [email protected].

329

ORCID

330

Jianfeng Ping: 0000-0002-0579-9830

331

Notes

332

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

333

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

334

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31301468).

335

REFERENCES

336

(1) Li, Z.; Liu, H.; Ouyang, C.; Hong Wee, W.; Cui, X.; Jian Lu, T.; Pingguan-Murphy, B.; Li, F.; Xu,

337

F. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26 (2), 165-180.

338

(2) Bandodkar, A. J.; Jia, W.; Ramirez, J.; Wang, J. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2015, 4 (8), 1215-1224.

339

(3) Yao, Y.; Ping, J. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2018, 105, 75-88.

340

(4) Ping, J.; Wang, Y.; Fan, K.; Tang, W.; Wu, J.; Ying, Y. J. Mater. Chem. 2013, 1 (37), 4781-4791.

341

(5) Liao, X.; Liao, Q.; Yan, X.; Liang, Q.; Si, H.; Li, M.; Wu, H.; Cao, S.; Zhang, Y. Adv. Funct. Mater.

342

2015, 25 (16), 2395-2401.

343

(6) Xu, L. Y.; Yang, G. Y.; Jing, H. Y.; Wei, J.; Han, Y. D. Nanotechnology 2014, 25 (5), 055201.

344

(7) Li, W.; Chen, M.; Wei, J.; Li, W.; You, C. J. Nanopart. Res. 2013, 15 (12), 1949.

345

(8) Han, J.-W.; Kim, B.; Li, J.; Meyyappan, M. Mater. Res. Bull. 2014, 50, 249-253.

346

(9) Jiang, C.; Lan, L.; Yao, Y.; Zhao, F.; Ping, J. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2018, 102, 236-249.

347

(10) Shu, J.; Qiu, Z.; Tang, D. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90 (16), 9691-9694. 14

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 14 of 26

Page 15 of 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Analytical Chemistry

348

(11) Zeng, R.; Luo, Z.; Zhang, L.; Tang, D. Anal. Chem. 2018, 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03889.

349

(12) Cai, G.; Yu, Z.; Ren, R.; Tang, D. ACS Sensors 2018, 3 (3), 632-639.

350

(13) Ping, J.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, Y.; Papper, V.; Boujday, S.; Marks, R. S.; Steele, T. W. Biosens.

351

Bioelectron. 2015, 64, 373-385.

352

(14) Jiang, X.; Zhao, X. L.; Jing, L. I.; Lin, S. Y.; Zhu, H. W. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2017, 62 (27), 3217-3235.

353

(15) Karim, N.; Afroj, S.; Malandraki, A.; Butterworth, S.; Beach, C.; Rigout, M.; Novoselov, K. S.;

354

Casson, A. J.; Yeates, S. G. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5 (44), 11640-11648.

355

(16) Hassan, G.; Bae, J.; Lee, C. H.; Hassan, A. J. Mater. Sci.-Mater. El. 2018, 29 (7), 5806-5813.

356

(17) Wu, B.; Zhang, X. F.; Huang, B. J.; Zhao, Y. T.; Cheng, C. T.; Chen, H. D. Sensors 2017, 17 (9),

357

2070.

358

(18) Lv, S.; Lin, Z.; Zhang, K.; Lu, M.; Tang, D. Anal. Chim. Acta 2017, 964, 67-73.

359

(19) Li, Q. F.; Jin, J.; Lou, F. M.; Tang, D. P. Sci. China Chem. 2018, 61 (6), 750-756.

360

(20) Novell, M.; Parrilla, M.; Crespo, G. A.; Rius, F. X.; Andrade, F. J. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84 (11),

361

4695-4702.

362

(21) Ping, J.; Wang, Y.; Ying, Y.; Wu, J. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84 (7), 3473-3479.

363

(22) Ping, J.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Ying, Y. Electrochem. Commun. 2011, 13 (12), 1529-1532.

364

(23) Lai, C. Z.; Joyer, M. M.; Fierke, M. A.; Petkovich, N. D.; Stein, A.; Buhlmann, P. J. Solid State

365

Electrochem. 2009, 13 (1), 123-128.

366

(24) Bobacka, J. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71 (21), 4932-4937.

367

(25) Lewenstam, A.; Bobacka, J.; Ivaska, A. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1994, 368 (1-2), 23-31.

368

(26) Mousavi, Z.; Bobacka, J.; Lewenstam, A.; Ivaska, A. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2009, 633 (1), 246-

369

252.

370

(27) Fouskaki, M.; Chaniotakis, N. Analyst 2008, 133 (8), 1072-1075.

371

(28) Enger, O.; Nuesch, F.; Fibbioli, M.; Echegoyen, L.; Pretsch, E.; Diederich, F. J. Mater. Chem.

372

2000, 10 (10), 2231-2233.

373

(29) Boeva, Z. A.; Lindfors, T. Sens. Actuators, B 2016, 224, 624-631.

374

(30) Ping, J.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Ying, Y. Food Chem. 2014, 151 (4), 65-71. 15

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Analytical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

375

(31) Xu, J. A.; Jia, F.; Li, F. H.; An, Q. B.; Gan, S. Y.; Zhang, Q. X.; Ivaska, A.; Niu, L. Electrochim.

376

Acta 2016, 222, 1007-1012.

377

(32) Janrungroatsakul, W.; Lertvachirapaiboon, C.; Ngeontae, W.; Aeungmaitrepirom, W.; Chailapakul,

378

O.; Ekgasit, S.; Tuntulani, T. Analyst 2013, 138 (22), 6786-6792.

379

(33) Criscuolo, F.; Taurino, I.; Stradolini, F.; Carrara, S.; De Micheli, G. Anal. Chim. Acta 2018, 1027,

380

22-32.

381

(34) Paczosa-Bator, B.; Cabaj, L.; Pięk, M.; Piech, R.; Kubiak, W. W. Anal. Lett. 2015, 48 (17), 2773-

382

2785.

383

(35) McManus, D.; Vranic, S.; Withers, F.; Sanchez-Romaguera, V.; Macucci, M.; Yang, H.; Sorrentino,

384

R.; Parvez, K.; Son, S. K.; Iannaccone, G.; Kostarelos, K.; Fiori, G.; Casiraghi, C. Nat. Nanotechnol.

385

2017, 12 (4), 343-350.

386

(36) Afkhami, A.; Bagheri, H.; Shirzadmehr, A.; Khoshsafar, H.; Hashemi, P. Electroanalysis 2012, 24

387

(11), 2176-2185.

388

(37) Pal, P.; Bhattacharyay, D.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Sarkar, P. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2009, 26 (1), 25-32.

389

(38) Nakazato, K.; Suzuki, K.; Nagamine, T.; Nakajima, K.; Sakai, T. Biomed. Res. Trace Elem. 2005,

390

16 (4), 364-366.

391

(39) Wilke, S.; Wang, H. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1999, 475 (1), 9-19.

392

16

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 16 of 26

Page 17 of 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

393

Analytical Chemistry

Table 1. Potentiometric selectivity coefficient values, logKpotCdM. Mn+

logKpotCdM (GN-WE/Cd2+-ISM)

logKpotCdM (GCE/Cd2+-ISM)

Mg2+

3.1×10–3

3.4×10–3

Zn2+

1.8×10–4

2.0×10–4

Ni2+

8.0×10–5

5.6×10–5

Ca+

8.0×10–5

5.5×10–5

Co2+

1.1×10–5

1.1×10–5

394

17

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Analytical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

396

Page 18 of 26

Table 2. Recovery test of Cd2+ in three kind of lake water samples. Recovery test Sample

Found (10‒6 M)

Added (10‒6 M)

Recovery (%)

Lake water 1

10.0

9.97 ± 0.41

99.7

Lake water 2

10.0

9.41 ± 0.55

94.1

Lake water 3

10.0

10.06 ± 0.77

100.6

18

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 19 of 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Analytical Chemistry

398

Figure captions:

399

Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of the fabrication process of GN ink-based all-written potentiometric

400

sensor.

401 402

Figure 1. Characterization of GN-WE. (A, B) SEM images of surface (A) and cross-section (B). (C)

403

Raman spectra for different positions of GN-WE. (D) The effect of thickness on the conductivity of

404

GN-WE.

405 406

Figure 2. Mechanical flexibility. (A) EMF value (recorded in 10–4 M Cd(NO3)2 aqueous solution) and

407

conductivity value after a series of bend cycles (10, 20, 50, and 100) with different bending angles (30°,

408

60°, and 90°). (B) Photograph of GN-WE/Cd2+-ISM bent outwards by 90°, inset: direct handwriting

409

using brush pen on PET substrate. (C) Photograph of conductive GN ink-based handwriting on paper.

410

(D) Photograph of GN ink-based handwriting on PET substrate before and after force applied.

411 412

Figure 3. Potentiometric performance of /Cd2+-ISM. (A) Dynamic curve of potentiometric response

413

recorded for increasing the concentration of Cd2+ in the solution, inset: expansion of the selected range.

414

(B) The corresponding calibration curve.

415 416

Figure 4. Chronopotentiograms and water layer test. (A) Chronopotentiograms for GCE/Cd2+-ISM and

417

GN-WE/Cd2+-ISM recorded in 10–3 M Cd(NO3)2 aqueous solution. The applied current is +1 nA for

418

100 s and −1 nA for 100 s. (B) Water layer test for GCE/Cd2+-ISM and GN-WE/Cd2+-ISM recorded in

419

10–3 M Cd(NO3)2 aqueous solution, the measurements were switched between 10–3 M Cd(NO3)2

420

aqueous solution and 10–3 M NaCl aqueous solution.

421 422

Figure 5. Impedance plots for GCE/Cd2+-ISM and GN-WE/Cd2+-ISM in 10–3 M Cd(NO3)2 aqueous

423

solution. Frequency range, from 900 kHz to 1.0 Hz; Edc, 0 V; Eac, 50 mV.

19

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Analytical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

425

Scheme 1.

426

20

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 20 of 26

Page 21 of 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

428

Analytical Chemistry

Figure 1.

429

21

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Analytical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

431

Figure 2.

432 433

22

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 22 of 26

Page 23 of 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

434

Analytical Chemistry

Figure 3.

435

23

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Analytical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

437

Figure 4.

438

24

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 24 of 26

Page 25 of 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

440

Analytical Chemistry

Figure 5.

441

25

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Analytical Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

443

TOC

444

26

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 26 of 26