Subscriber access provided by University of South Dakota
Food and Beverage Chemistry/Biochemistry
Gastrointestinal Fate of Fluid and Gelled Nutraceutical Emulsions: Impact on Proteolysis, Lipolysis, and Quercetin Bioaccessibility Xing Chen, David Julian McClements, Yuqing Zhu, Liqiang Zou, Ziling Li, Wei Liu, Ce Cheng, Hongxia Gao, and Chengmei Liu J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b03003 • Publication Date (Web): 13 Aug 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on August 16, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Gastrointestinal Fate of Fluid and Gelled Nutraceutical Emulsions: Impact on Proteolysis, Lipolysis, and Quercetin Bioaccessibility Xing Chen a, David Julian McClements b, Yuqing Zhu a, Liqiang Zou a*, Ziling Li a,c, Wei Liu a*, Ce Cheng, Hongxia Gao a, Chengmei Liu a a
State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University, No.
235 Nanjing East Road, Nanchang 330047, Jiangxi, China b
Biopolymers & Colloids Research Laboratory, Department of Food Science,
University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA c
School of Life Science, Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University,
Nanchang, 330013, Jiangxi, PR China
Corresponding Authors *Liqiang Zou (L.Z.), Tel: + 86 791 88305872 8106. Fax: + 86 791 88334509. E-mail:
[email protected]. *Wei Liu (W.L.), Tel: + 86 791 88305872 8106. Fax: + 86 791 88334509. E-mail
[email protected].
1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
ABSTRACT: Fluid and gelled nutraceutical emulsions were formulated from
2
quercetin-loaded caseinate-stabilized emulsions by addition of gellan gum with or
3
without acidification with glucono-delta-lactone (GDL).
4
increased the viscosity or gel strength of the fluid and gelled emulsions, respectively.
5
The behavior of the nutraceutical emulsions in a simulated gastrointestinal tract
6
depended on their initial composition.
7
gum levels (0 to 0.2%) had similar protein and lipid hydrolysis rates, as well as
8
similar quercetin bioaccessibility (~ 51%). Conversely, proteolysis, lipolysis, and
9
quercetin bioaccessibility decreased with increasing gellan gum level in the gelled
10
emulsions. Compared with gelled emulsions, fluid emulsions were digested more
11
rapidly and led to higher quercetin bioaccessibility. There was a good correlation
12
between quercetin bioaccessibility and lipolysis rate. These findings are useful for
13
designing nutraceutical-loaded emulsions that can be used in a wide range of food
14
products with different rheological properties.
15
KEYWORDS: Emulsions, Emulsion gels, Quercetin, Proteolysis, Lipolysis,
16
Bioaccessibility
Page 2 of 41
Gellan gum addition
Fluid emulsions containing different gellan
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 3 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
17
INTRODUCTION
18
The potential health benefits of many hydrophobic nutraceuticals are not
19
realized in practice because of their low water-solubility, chemical instability, and
20
low oral bioavailability
21
designing the composition and structure of food matrices.
22
nutraceutical bioavailability can be improved in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) by
23
increasing bioaccessibility, reducing degradation, and enhancing absorption by
24
creating food matrices that enhance these different phenomena
25
emulsions are particularly good platforms for the development of delivery systems
26
for hydrophobic nutraceuticals because of the considerable flexibility in controlling
27
their compositions and structures 5.
28
carbohydrates, lipids and minerals in emulsions can easily be controlled, as well as
29
the droplet size distribution of emulsions.
30
shown to be high effective at enhancing the bioaccessibility of various types of
31
hydrophobic nutraceuticals, including curcumin
32
quercetin 10, 11.
1, 2
.
These challenges can often be overcome by carefully In particular,
3, 4
. Oil-in-water
For instance, the type and level of proteins,
Fluid emulsions have already been
6, 7
, lycopene 8, β-carotene 9, and
33
In the current study, we focus on using emulsions to improve the
34
bioaccessibility of quercetin (3,3′,4′,5,7-pentahydroxyflavone), which is a major
35
source of flavonoids in the human diet 12.
36
a number of biological properties that may maintain or improve human health
37
including antioxidant, anti-carcinogenic, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, anti-obesity,
Quercetin has been reported to exhibit 13-16
,
3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
17-19
.
Page 4 of 41
38
antibacterial and hepato-protective effects.
Like other hydrophobic
39
nutraceuticals, the utilization of quercetin as a bioactive agent in foods is limited by
40
its poor water-solubility, chemical instability, and low oral bioavailability
41
previous studies, fluid emulsions stabilized by either synthetic surfactants or natural
42
biopolymers have been shown to improve the water-solubility, chemical stability,
43
and bioaccessibility of quercetin 10, 11.
20
. In
44
Commercial food emulsions come in various textures, including low viscosity
45
liquids (dairy, soy, or almond milk), viscous fluids (creams, dips, dressings), or gels
46
(yoghurts, cheeses, desserts).
47
low viscosity nutraceutical emulsions, which may not be suitable for application in
48
all food products.
49
different forms of nutraceutical emulsions that are more suitable for other food
50
applications.
51
creating emulsions with different textural properties.
52
with different viscosities were fabricated by adding a thickening agent (gellan gum)
53
to the systems.
54
Sphingomonas elodea, which is used in foods as a thickener, gelling agent, or
55
stabilizer
56
aggregation of the casein-coated droplets and gellan gum mixture by acidification
57
using glucono-delta-lactone (GDL) 23.
58
Previous studies have focused on the development of
For this reason, there is a need to examine the development of
In this study, we used casein-coated oil droplets as a platform for Fluid nutraceutical emulsions
Gellan gum is a linear anionic polysaccharide produced by
21, 22
. Gelled nutraceutical emulsions were formed by promoting
We hypothesized that the initial composition, structure, and rheology of the 4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
59
nutraceutical emulsions would influence their gastrointestinal fates by interfering
60
with digestion or release processes.
61
shown that these properties alter the gastrointestinal fate of nutrients and
62
nutraceuticals.
63
starch suspensions 24.
64
viscosity and interact with digestive enzymes 25. Xanthan or carrageenan decreased
65
digestion of soybean proteins due to gelation of gastric fluids
66
reduced the bioaccessibility of β-carotene encapsulated within lipid droplets
27
67
Pectin caused significantly reduced bioaccessibility of lycopene in tomato paste
28
68
These studies suggest that the incorporation of texturing biopolymers into emulsions
69
may alter their gastrointestinal fates.
Indeed, a number of studies have already
β-glucan increases the viscosity and decreases the hydrolysis of oat Pectin decreases starch digestion due to its ability to increase
26
. Carrageenan . .
70
In the present study, nutraceutical emulsions with different textural properties
71
were fabricated by addition of gellan gum and GDL. Rheological and morphological
72
analyses were conducted to provide understanding of the impact of biopolymer
73
addition and acidification on the properties of the emulsions. Additionally, an in
74
vitro gastrointestinal model was used to characterize the gastrointestinal fate of the
75
emulsions.
76
MATERIALS AND METHODS
77
Materials
78
Corn oil was obtained from Yi Haikerry Grain and Oil Food Company
79
(Nanchang, China). Quercetin (97%) and D-(+)-Gluconic acid δ-lactone were 5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
80
purchased from Aladdin Industrial Corporation (Shanghai, China). Gellan gum (high
81
acyl KELCOGEL), high ester pectin, carrageenan, and xanthan gum were provided
82
by CP Kelco (Shanghai, China). Casein (sodium salt) from bovine milk (C8654),
83
gum arabic from acacia tree (G9752), pepsin from porcine gastric mucosa (P7125,
84
enzymatic activity of ≥ 400 units/mg protein), lipase from porcine pancreas type II
85
(L3126; enzymatic activity of 100−500 units/mg protein using olive oil), pancreatin
86
from porcine pancreas (P1750; 4 × US Pharmacopeia (USP) specifications), mucin
87
from porcine stomach type II (M2378), Nile Blue A (N0766) and Nile red (72485)
88
were obtained from the Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO). All other
89
reagents used were of analytical grade.
90
Emulsion preparation
91
Page 6 of 41
The fluid emulsions were prepared based on the method described in a previous 29
92
study (Figure 1)
93
sodium caseinate in ultrapure water, and then sodium azide (0.02 wt%) was added to
94
protect the protein from microbial spoilage during storage. To ensure complete
95
protein hydration, the casein solutions were continuously stirred (150 rpm) for 2 h at
96
40 °C, and then left overnight at ambient temperature. A coarse oil-in-water
97
emulsion was then prepared by blending corn oil (10 wt%) with emulsifier solution
98
(90 wt%) at 15,000 rpm for 2 min using a high shear mixer (T18 digital,
99
ULTRATURRAX®, IKA, Staufen, Germany). The droplet size was then reduced
100
further by passing the coarse emulsions through a microfluidizer 3 times at 12,000
.
An emulsifier solution was prepared by dispersing 4 wt%
6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
101
psi (M-110EH30, Microfluidic Corp., Newton, MA, USA). The emulsions were then
102
mixed with gellan gum (0.1, 0.2, 0.3 wt%) at 80 °C for 30 min, followed by cooling
103
to ambient temperature (25 °C) to obtain emulsions with different viscosities. These
104
samples were then all adjusted to pH 6.5 before further use. Quercetin-loaded
105
emulsions were then prepared by dissolving 0.4 mg/g quercetin into the emulsions
106
under continuous stirring at 100 °C for 10 min.
107
Gelled emulsions were prepared by adding a fixed amount (0.8 wt%) of GDL to
108
the fluid nutraceutical emulsions.
The samples were then stirred for 10 min using a
109
magnetic stirrer, and then maintained at 25 °C for gel formation to occur. The
110
change in pH with time was monitored using a digital pH meter (827 pH Lab,
111
Metrohm, Switzerland).
112
Zeta-potential measurements
113
The surface potential (zeta-potential) of the particles in the emulsions was
114
determined using a commercial particle electrophoresis instrument (Zetasizer Nano
115
ZSP, Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK). Before each test, the samples were
116
diluted with ultrapure water and adjusted to different pH values using HCl or NaOH
117
solutions.
118
Rheology measurement
119
Time-sweep oscillatory measurements were performed using a dynamic shear
120
rheometer (MCR302, Anton Paar, Germany) with a plate-plate geometry (pp-50, 50
7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 8 of 41
121
mm diameter) as described elsewhere with some slight modifications 30. GDL (0.8
122
wt%) was mixed with fluid emulsions containing different gellan gum contents.
123
The mixtures were then stirred for 10 min using a magnetic stirrer and about 2 mL
124
of sample was collected and placed onto the measurement cell of the rheology
125
instrument maintained at 25 °C. The samples were then covered with a thin layer of
126
low viscosity silicone oil to prevent water evaporation and left to stand for 5 min to
127
allow thermal equilibrium before the measurement. The change in the elastic (G')
128
and loss (G'') modulus over time was measured at a constant frequency of 1 Hz and
129
strain amplitude of 0.5%.
130
which was established using a preliminary experiment.
131
Microstructure observation
These values were in the linear viscoelastic region,
132
The morphology of the fluid and gelled nutraceutical emulsions (after
133
acidification for 12 h) was determined using confocal laser scanning microscopy
134
(CLSM, Carl Zeiss LSM710, Jena, Germany) base on a earlier description
135
Emulsion droplets were stained using Nile red (oil phase) and Nile Blue A (aqueous
136
phase). Samples were placed into a glass bottom cell culture dish for observation
137
under a 63 × objective.
138
with wavelengths of 488 nm (Nile red) and 633 nm (Nile blue A), fluorescence
139
images were recorded at wavelengths of 570 nm for Nile red and 660 nm for Nile
140
blue A.
31
.
The fluorescence signal was excitated using laser sources
8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
141 142
In vitro digestion model The gastrointestinal fate of the nutraceutical emulsions was monitored using a
143
three-step simulated gastrointestinal model as described earlier 32.
144
0.3% gellan gum possessed relatively higher viscosity, which slowered the
145
dissolution of nutraceutical (quercetin) in emulsions.
146
gastrointestinal behavior of nutraceutical emulsions containing 0, 0.1 or 0.2% gellan
147
gum.
148
simulate oral breakdown
149
taken for lipolysis, proteolysis, and bioaccessibility measurements.
150
analysis, these samples were diluted with distilled water so that they had initial corn
151
oil contents of 2.5 wt% (for lipolysis analysis) and 5 wt% (for proteolysis and
152
bioaccessibility
153
gastrointestinal fluids were preheated to 37 °C prior to carrying out the simulated
154
GIT study.
155
stomach (120 min) and intestine (120 min) stages.
156
Emulsions with
We thus monitored the
Gelled emulsions after acidification for 12 h were cut into ∼5.0 mm cubes to 33, 34
analysis),
, and then fluid and gelled emulsion samples were
respectively.
All
the
samples
and
Prior to
simulated
The samples were then passed through the simulated mouth (10 min),
For proteolysis and lipolysis experiments, quercetin-free fluid and gelled
157
emulsions containing 0, 0.1 or 0.2% gellan gum were tested.
Changes in the
158
properties of the casein during gastric digestion were monitored by stopping the
159
proteolysis reaction at various digestion times by raising the pH to 7.0. These
160
samples were then kept at pH 7.0 with continuous stirring at 1000 rpm to obtain
161
uniform solutions for sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis 9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 10 of 41
162
(SDS-PAGE) analysis. During the simulated small intestine period, the free fatty
163
acids (FFA) released from the matrix versus time was measured to investigate the
164
rate and extent of triacylglycerol (corn oil) digestion. The small intestinal fluids
165
were maintained at pH 7.0 throughout lipolysis by addition of 0.1 mol/L NaOH
166
solution using a pH-stat automatic titration unit (Metrohm 907 Titrando, Metrohm,
167
Switzerland), and the volume of NaOH was recorded to calculate the percentage of
168
free fatty acids (FFA %) released from the emulsions 35.
169
The bioaccessibility of quercetin was measured in fluid and gelled nutraceutical
170
emulsions with different gellan gum levels (0, 0.1 or 0.2%).
171
small intestine stage, the digesta was immediately cooled in ice water, and the
172
undigested oil floating on the top of the samples was removed. The remainder of the
173
samples were then centrifuged (18,000 rpm) at 4 °C for 30 min. The clear middle
174
layer formed in the tubes after centrifugation was assumed to be the mixed micelle
175
phase, which contained the bioaccessible fraction of quercetin. The bioaccessibility
176
of quercetin was then determined by measuring its relative concentration in the
177
micelle phase compared to the initial amount using high performance liquid
178
chromatography (HPLC):
179
After the simulated
Bioaccessibility (%) = 100 × As/ Ainitial
180
Here AS is the amount of quercetin solubilized in the clear middle layer and Ainitial is
181
the initial amount of quercetin added into the system.
10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
182
Protein hydrolysis
183
The pepsin digest of the casein was collected at different periods during the
184
gastric phase and analyzed using SDS-PAGE based on a method described earlier 26.
185
The casein digest was treated with SDS loading buffer, heated at 95–100 °C for 10
186
min, and then centrifuged (3000 rpm) for 10 s. The obtained samples were cooled to
187
room temperature and loaded (10 µL) onto a gel system containing 5% stacking gel
188
and 12% separating gel (SDS-PAGE Gel Kit, Solarbio, Beijing, China). The gel was
189
run in a Bio-Rad Miniprotein unit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA)
190
at 200 V, then stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue Fast Staining solution (Solarbio,
191
Beijing, China) and subsequently destained using pure water.
192
Quercetin analysis
193
The quercetin content of the samples was determined by HPLC (Agilent 1260, 10
194
Agilent Technologies, USA) as described previously
195
absolute ethanol to an appropriate concentration and then centrifuged (6,000 rpm) at
196
4 °C for 5 min.
197
nylon filter before further analysis. The chromatogram was recorded at 25 °C, and
198
area under the peaks was used to calculate the quercetin concentration from a
199
pre-established standard curve (0.5-20 µg/mL, R2 = 0.9991).
200
Statistical analysis
201
. Samples were diluted with
The supernatant was then collected and filtered through a 0.22 µm
All experiments were repeated three times and the results are expressed as the 11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 12 of 41
202
mean and standard deviations of these measurements. Data analysis was carried out
203
by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS software (Version 17.0), and
204
values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
205
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
206
Impact of polysaccharide type on emulsion stability
207
Interactions between proteins and polysaccharides may lead to thermodynamic
208
incompatibility of protein-polysaccharide mixtures, promoting segregative phase
209
separation 36.
210
impact of polysaccharide type on emulsion stability. Casein-stabilized emulsions
211
were mixed with different levels of polysaccharides (0.1-0.3%) and then stored for
212
24 hours.
213
storage some of them separated into a droplet-rich cream layer at the top and a
214
droplet-depleted serum layer at the bottom (Figure 2). In particular, distinct phase
215
separation was observed in the emulsions containing pectin, carrageenan, and
216
xanthan gum.
217
to promote extensive depletion and/or bridging flocculation of the droplets in the
218
emulsions 37.
219
gum remained homogeneous after storage.
220
of gum arabic gives rise to compact molecules with a relatively small hydrodynamic
221
volume and as a consequence even 30% gum arabic solutions have a low viscosity 38.
222
Consequently, gellan gum was used in the remainder of the study to produce
Consequently, an initial experiment was carried out to ascertain the
Initially, all the emulsions had a uniform white appearance, but after
These effects can be attributed to the ability of these polysaccharides
On the other hand, the emulsions containing gum arabic and gellan However, the highly branched structure
12
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 13 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
223
emulsions with a range of rheological properties.
224
Effect of gellan gum and acidification on emulsion rheology
225
In this section, a dynamic shear rheometer was used to characterize the impact
226
of gellan gum and acidification on the rheology of the emulsions. The initial
227
casein-stabilized oil-in-water emulsions had a low shear modulus and high damping
228
factor (tan δ > 1) (Figure 3a, b, c), which indicated that could be considered to be
229
viscous liquids. The elastic (G') and viscous (G'') components of the shear modulus
230
of these emulsions increased, while the damping factor decreased (tan δ < 1), as the
231
amount of gellan gum added increased, which indicated that the emulsions became
232
viscoelastic fluids after polysaccharide addition.
233
The gelled emulsions were formed by adding GDL to caseinate-stabilized
234
emulsions so as to reduce the pH (Figure 3d). As the pH decreased, the surface
235
potential (zeta-potential) of the casein-coated oil droplets decreased (Table 1),
236
which led to a reduction in the electrostatic repulsion between them.
237
three-dimensional network of aggregated droplets was formed that increased the
238
shear modulus of the emulsions (Figure 3a, b).
239
emulsions became predominantly elastic, i.e., G' > G'' (Figure 3c) and emulsion gels
240
were formed (Figure 4).
241
more rapid gelation and to a higher final gel strength, which may have been due to
242
an interaction between the casein and gellan gum molecules
243
solution conditions (pH 6.5), both the casein and gellan gum were negatively
As a result, a
Eventually, the rheology of the
The presence of gellan gum in the initial emulsions led to
39
.
Under the initial
13
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 14 of 41
244
charged (Table 1).
245
between the protein and polysaccharide molecules, which prevented them from
246
aggregating.
247
negatively charged, excluded-volume effects caused by the presence of the
248
highly-extended polysaccharide molecules may have led to a higher local protein
249
concentration, which caused the casein molecules to aggregate more rapidly (see
250
later).
251
gellan gum were formed
252
However, when the pH was reduced further, the casein became positively charged,
253
and so there was an electrostatic attraction between cationic patches on the protein
254
surfaces and anionic groups on the polysaccharide chains.
255
of an intermediate level of gellan gum (0.1%) led to a stiffer gel being formed than
256
at higher levels (0.2% or 0.3%).
257
polysaccharide concentration on bridging flocculation 42.
258
there is insufficient polysaccharide present to interact with all the protein-coated
259
droplets.
260
cover the oil droplet surfaces and link numerous oil droplets together.
261
gellan gum levels, some of the oil droplets are completely coated by polysaccharide
262
molecules and are therefore are not involved in bridging flocculation.
263
Emulsion microstructure
264
Consequently, there would be an electrostatic repulsion
When the pH was reduced the casein molecules became less
What’s more, by lowering the pH, hydrogen bonds between the helices of 40, 41
, which may have enhanced emulsion gel rigidity.
Interestingly, addition
This effect may have been due to the impact of At low gellan gum levels,
At intermediate gellan gum levels, the polysaccharide molecules partially At high
The microstructure of fluid and gelled emulsions containing different levels of 14
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 15 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
265
gellan gum were recorded using confocal laser scanning microscopy.
266
casein were stained using Nile red (red channel) and Nile Blue A (green channel),
267
respectively.
268
droplets (d = 233 nm) that were evenly dispersed throughout the sample (Figure 5).
269
After acidification for 12 h, some small protein aggregates were observed in this
270
emulsion but the fat droplets and proteins remained uniformly dispersed.
271
contrast, studies have shown that casein gels formed by heating have a more uneven
272
microstructure that became increasingly heterogeneous with increasing temperature
273
43
274
polysaccharide-rich zones (black regions) that appeared to form fibrous structures.
275
The nature of these structures depended on the level of gellan gum present, as well
276
as on acidification.
277
more extensive in the samples that had been acidified with GDL, which may be due
278
to the enhanced helix–helix associations between the junction zones of gellan at
279
lower pH values
280
compact structure: the higher the content of gellan gum, the more compact structure.
281
Additionally, after acidification for 12 h, some emulsion aggregates were
282
incorporated in black gellan gum zones in gelled emulsions with 0.2% or 0.3%
283
gellan (Figure 5), which may be attributed to electrostatic attraction between
284
positively charged protein and negatively charged polysaccharide (Table 1).
285
Oil and
Initially, the casein-stabilized emulsions contained relatively small
In
. In the samples containing gellan gum, there was evidence of distinct
40
.
In particular, the polysaccharide-rich zones appeared to be
Addition of gellan gum into gelled emulsions led to a more
We hypothesized that differences in the microstructures and rheology of the 15
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 16 of 41
286
emulsions would lead to alterations in their gastrointestinal fate, and so we
287
investigated the digestion and bioaccessibility of the fluid and gelled emulsions
288
using a simulated GIT.
289
Protein digestibility
290
Commercial sodium caseinate is a mixture of different proteins, with the major
291
fractions being α-casein (23.5 kDa), β-casein (24.0 kDa) and κ-casein (19.0 kDa) at
292
levels of around 50%, 35% and 15%, respectively
293
that the sodium caseinate used in our study had two bands with fairly similar
294
molecular weights corresponding to α-casein and β-casein, and another band with a
295
lower molecular weight corresponding to κ-casein (Figure 6). Comparison with the
296
standard protein markers, suggested that all three protein bands had molecular
297
weights > 25 kDa, which is higher than expected, but has also been reported in other
298
studies
299
strongly bind sodium ions thereby increasing their molecular weight.
300
change in the position or intensity of the electrophoresis bands from the casein
301
fractions in the initial fluid or gelled samples tested, which suggests that protein
302
polymerization or fragmentation did not occur during emulsion formation.
45-47
.
44
. Gel electrophoresis showed
This effect may be due to the ability of the phosphate-rich caseins to There was no
303
The proteolysis of the casein fractions under simulated gastric conditions was
304
then investigated using SDS-PAGE (Figure 7). In the fluid emulsions, which were
305
not exposed to GDL treatment, the casein molecules were rapidly hydrolyzed into
306
peptides with the disappearance of all three casein bands after 2 min of digestion. 16
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 17 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
307
As the digestion time increased, there was an increase of in the amount of smaller
308
peptide fragments that accumulated at the bottom of the acrylamide gel.
309
amount of gellan gum present in the emulsions (0 to 0.2%) had little impact on the
310
rate or extent of protein digestion.
311
exposed to GDL treatment, the casein appeared to be much more resistant to pepsin
312
digestion.
313
bands corresponding to the three casein fractions after 10 min of digestion (Figure
314
7d, e, f).
315
the intensity of the bands corresponding to casein peptides increased, indicating that
316
proteolysis did occur.
317
casein molecules in the gelled emulsions after 120 min of proteolysis. Visual
318
observation of the samples after gastric digestion indicated that there were still some
319
relatively large gel fragments present in the emulsion gels (Figure 9b). These results
320
suggest that gelation of the emulsions reduced the extent of protein digestion,
321
presumably by inhibiting the ability of the pepsin molecules from reaching the
322
casein molecules.
323
enzyme, while in the gelled samples, the main casein was trapped in gel cubes and
324
the enzyme only had immediate access to the protein on the surface of the cubes.
325
Additionally, the presence of the gellan gum in the emulsion gels led to more
326
undigested protein fragments remaining at the end of the stomach phase (Figure 9b)
327
and fewer peptide fragments being formed (Figure 7d, e, f).
The
In the gelled emulsions, which had been
Indeed, there was little change in the intensity of the electrophoresis
As proteolysis continued, the intensity of these bands decreased, while
Interestingly, there was still evidence of some undigested
For the fluid emulsions, all the protein was accessible to the
This result suggests 17
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 18 of 41
328
that the gellan gum further suppressed protein digestion, which may have been
329
because it limited the accessibility of pepsin to casein.
330
gels (Figure 3) that were more resistant to breakdown under simulated GIT
331
conditions, reducing the surface area of gel particles exposed to the enzyme.
332
Previous studies have shown that soft gels break down faster than hard gels, thereby
333
making it easier for pepsin to hydrolyze the proteins 48.
334
contributed to the formation of more compact structures (Figure 5) in the emulsion
335
gels, which may reduce the diffusion rate of pepsin through the gel network.
336
Therefore, the diffusion rate of enzymes into the gels appears to be a key rate
337
limiting factor of digestion, which may be controlled by the porosity of the gel
338
matrix.
339
Fat digestion
340
Gellan gum led to stronger
Additionally, gellan gum
The rate and extent of lipid digestion in the emulsions under simulated small
341
intestine conditions were measured using a pH stat method (Figure 8).
For
342
lipolysis analysis, all intestinal fluids had an initial corn oil content of 0.5 wt%.
343
The lipids in all the samples were hydrolyzed rapidly during the first 10 min with
344
around 50 to 73% of the FFA being released, followed by a more gradual hydrolysis
345
at later times until over 96% of the FFA was released after 120 min.
346
extent of lipid digestion was fairly similar in all the fluid emulsions, regardless of
347
the gellan gum level, which suggested that the presence of this polysaccharide did
348
not interfere with the ability of the lipase molecules to access the oil droplet
The rate and
18
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 19 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
349
surfaces.
350
The rate and extent of lipid digestion was somewhat suppressed in the gelled
351
emulsions, with the effect increasing with increasing gellan gum level (Figure 8).
352
The rate of lipid digestion may have been decreased in the gelled emulsions because
353
they contained large gel fragments that inhibited the ability of the lipase molecules
354
to reach the surfaces of the oil droplets trapped inside.
355
reported that trapping oil droplets in protein gels can inhibit their lipolysis
356
When the gellan gum content was raised from 0.1% to 0.2%, the rate of lipolysis
357
gradually decreased, which may be attributed to oil droplets being incorporated in
358
more compact gel structures at higher polysaccharide concentrations.
359
some oil droplets were trapped in polysaccharide-rich zones for the systems
360
containing 0.2% gellan gum (Figure 5), which may also have slowed the access of
361
bile salts and/or lipase to the corn oil.
362
increased to 1.0 wt%, there were even more large undigested emulsion gel fragments
363
remaining by the end of the intestinal stage (Figure 9b).
364
fragments appeared to increase with increasing gellan gum concentration, which
365
may result into suppression of lipid digestion.
366
Quercetin bioaccessibility
367
Previous studies have also 33, 34
.
What’s more,
When the initial corn oil content was
The size of these
The digestion studies showed that the fats and proteins in the emulsions were
368
digested at different rates depending on their initial compositions and textures.
In
369
this section, we therefore examined the impact of emulsion properties on the 19
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 20 of 41
370
bioaccessibility of quercetin after in vitro digestion.
The was no statistical
371
difference (Duncan, p ≥ 0.05) in the measured quercetin bioaccessibility (~ 51.0%)
372
in any of the fluid emulsions, regardless of the gellan gum level present (Figure 9a).
373
This suggested that the gellan gum did not interfere with the release and
374
solubilization of the nutraceutical from these emulsions.
375
expected because the rate and extent of fat and protein digestion was similar in all of
376
the fluid emulsions.
377
that the addition of another anionic polysaccharide (alginate) to protein-stabilized
378
fluid emulsions did not impact the lipolysis rate or curcumin bioaccessibility
379
Conversely, addition of a cationic polysaccharide (chitosan) to protein-stabilized
380
fluid emulsions inhibited lipolysis and decreased carotenoid bioaccessibility, which
381
was attributed to its ability to bind to anionic species such as bile salts and free fatty
382
acids 50.
This effect might be
These results are in agreement with other studies that reported
49
.
383
In contrast to the fluid emulsions, the bioaccessibility of quercetin in the gelled
384
emulsions decreased significantly with increasing gellan gum level (Figure 9a).
385
This decrease in bioaccessibility may be attributed to the fact that some undigested
386
fat remained in the gelled emulsions after exposure to the simulated GIT (Figure
387
9b).
388
phase.
389
contributing to solubilization of quercetin in micellar phase.
390
experiments showed that the amount of FFA produced during lipid digestion is
As a result, some of the quercetin remained trapped in the undigested oil What’s more, released quercetin could interact with mixed micelles
51
,
FFA release
20
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 21 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
391
actually very similar between all the samples at the end of digestion, approaching
392
100% (Figure 8), therefore the concentration of mixed micelles must also be quite
393
similar.
394
is severely limited, that mixed micelles were also trapped in the network.
395
the digestion conditions between the lipid digestion and bioaccessibility experiments
396
were different, as evidenced by the remaining gel particles observed at the end of the
397
bioaccessibility study (Figure 8, 9b).
398
released from these emulsion gels, which may be related to micellization 52, which
399
ultimately determines the solubilization and bioaccessibility of the released
400
quercetin.
401
the bioaccessibility of nutraceuticals, such as β-carotene in fat droplet-loaded
402
carrageenan gels
403
can increase nutraceutical bioaccessibility.
404
have a higher bioaccessibility in starch-based emulsion gels than in simple
405
emulsions, which was attributed to the ability of the starch matrix to inhibit fat
406
droplet aggregation, thereby leading to a larger exposed lipid surface area 53.
407
impact of gelation on bioaccessibility therefore appears to be highly system
408
dependent and is closely linked to the impact of gelation on lipid digestion.
409
Typically, the greater the amount that lipid digestion is inhibited, the lower the
410
bioaccessibility of any hydrophobic nutraceuticals.
411
It is possible that, considering that diffusion of the enzymes into the matrix However,
There was a different amount of FFAs
Some previous studies have also reported that emulsion gelation reduces
27
.
However, other studies have reported that emulsion gelation For instance, β-carotene was found to
The
In summary, we have shown that nutraceutical-loaded emulsions with different 21
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 22 of 41
412
rheological properties can be produced by polysaccharide addition and acidification.
413
A simulated gastrointestinal tract study showed that fluid emulsions were digested
414
more rapidly than gelled emulsions, which led to a higher bioaccessibility of
415
quercetin.
416
digestion could be suppressed by increasing the level of gellan gum present.
417
effect was attributed to the formation of gels that were more resistant to
418
fragmentation under simulated GIT conditions.
419
for digestive enzymes (proteases or lipases) to reach their substrates (proteins or
420
lipids) inside the gel fragments.
421
bioaccessibility of quercetin, which was attributed to the fact that some of the
422
quercetin remained in the undigested oil phase and there were less mixed micelles
423
available to solubilize the quercetin.
424
suitable for enhancing nutraceutical bioavailability while gelled emulsions may be
425
more suitable for inhibiting lipid digestion and controlling body weight.
426
results show that the gastrointestinal fate of emulsions can be modulated by altering
427
their composition, structure, and textural properties, which may be important for
428
optimizing the design of functional foods.
429
References
430 431 432 433 434 435
(1)
For the gelled emulsions, the rate and extent of lipid and protein This
As a result, it was more difficult
Inhibition of lipid digestion reduced the
Hence, fluid emulsions appear to be most
These
McClements, D. J., Enhanced delivery of lipophilic bioactives using emulsions: a review of
major factors affecting vitamin, nutraceutical, and lipid bioaccessibility. Food & Function 2018, 9, 22-41. (2)
Aronson, J. K., Defining 'nutraceuticals': neither nutritious nor pharmaceutical. Br. J. Clin.
Pharmacol. 2017, 83, 8-19. (3)
Flores, F. P.; Kong, F., In Vitro Release Kinetics of Microencapsulated Materials and the Effect 22
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 23 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477
of the Food Matrix. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 8, 237-259. (4)
McClements, D. J.; Xiao, H., Designing food structure and composition to enhance
nutraceutical bioactivity to support cancer inhibition. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2017, 46, 215-226. (5)
McClements, D. J.; Saliva-Trujillo, L.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, Z.; Zou, L.; Yao, M.; Xiao, H.,
Boosting the bioavailability of hydrophobic nutrients, vitamins, and nutraceuticals in natural products using excipient emulsions. Food Res. Int. 2016, 88, 140-152. (6)
Zou, L.; Liu, W.; Liu, C.; Xiao, H.; McClements, D., Julian, Utilizing food matrix effects to
enhance nutraceutical bioavailability: increase of curcumin bioaccessibility using excipient emulsions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 2052-2062. (7)
Zou, L.; Zheng, B.; Liu, W.; Liu, C.; Xiao, H.; McClements, D. J., Enhancing nutraceutical
bioavailability using excipient emulsions: Influence of lipid droplet size on solubility and bioaccessibility of powdered curcumin. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 15, 72-83. (8)
Salvia-Trujillo, L.; McClements, D. J., Enhancement of lycopene bioaccessibility from tomato
juice using excipient emulsions: Influence of lipid droplet size. Food Chem. 2016, 210, 295-304. (9)
Salvia-Trujillo, L.; McClements, D. J., Improvement of beta-Carotene Bioaccessibility from
Dietary Supplements Using Excipient Nanoemulsions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 4639-4647. (10) Chen, X.; Zou, L.; Liu, W.; McClements, D. J., Potential of Excipient Emulsions for Improving Quercetin Bioaccessibility and Antioxidant Activity: An in Vitro Study. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 2016, 64, 3653-3660. (11) Chen, X.; McClements, D. J.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zou, L.; Liu, W.; Cheng, C.; Fu, D.; Liu, C., Enhancement of the solubility, stability and bioaccessibility of quercetin using protein-based excipient emulsions. Food Res. Int. 2018, 114, 30-37. (12) Conquer, J. A.; Maiani, G.; Azzini, E.; Raguzzini, A.; Holub, B. J., Supplementation with Quercetin Markedly Increases Plasma Quercetin Concentration without Effect on Selected Risk Factors for Heart Disease in Healthy Subjects. J. Nutr. 1998, 128, 593-597. (13) Boots, A. W.; Haenen, G. R.; Bast, A., Health effects of quercetin: from antioxidant to nutraceutical. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 585, 325-337. (14) Panchal, S. K.; Poudyal, H.; Brown, L., Quercetin ameliorates cardiovascular, hepatic, and metabolic changes in diet-induced metabolic syndrome in rats. J. Nutr. 2012, 142, 1026-1032. (15) Egert, S.; Bosy-Westphal, A.; Seiberl, J.; Kürbitz, C.; Settler, U.; Plachta-Danielzik, S.; Wagner, A. E.; Frank, J.; Schrezenmeir, J.; Rimbach, G.; Wolffram, S.; Müller, M. J., Quercetin reduces systolic blood pressure and plasma oxidised low-density lipoprotein concentrations in overweight subjects with a high-cardiovascular disease risk phenotype: a double-blinded, placebo-controlled cross-over study. Br. J. Nutr. 2009, 102, 1065-1074. (16) Murakami, A.; Ashida, H.; Terao, J., Multitargeted cancer prevention by quercetin. Cancer Lett. 2008, 269, 315-325. (17) Kawabata, K.; Mukai, R.; Ishisaka, A., Quercetin and related polyphenols: new insights and implications for their bioactivity and bioavailability. Food Funct. 2015, 6, 1399-1417. (18) Wang, W.; Sun, C.; Mao, L.; Ma, P.; Liu, F.; Yang, J.; Gao, Y., The biological activities, chemical stability, metabolism and delivery systems of quercetin: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 56, 21-38. (19) Nabavi, S. F.; Russo, G. L.; Daglia, M.; Nabavi, S. M., Role of quercetin as an alternative for 23
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519
Page 24 of 41
obesity treatment: you are what you eat! Food Chem. 2015, 179, 305-310. (20) Cai, X.; Fang, Z.; Dou, J.; Yu, A.; Zhai, G., Bioavailability of quercetin: Problems and promises. Curr. Med. Chem. 2013, 20, 2572-2582. (21) Buldo, P.; Benfeldt, C.; Carey, J. P.; Folkenberg, D. M.; Jensen, H. B.; Sieuwerts, S.; Vlachvei, K.; Ipsen, R., Interactions of milk proteins with low and high acyl gellan: Effect on microstructure and textural properties of acidified milk. Food Hydrocolloid. 2016, 60, 225-231. (22) Prajapati, V. D.; Jani, G. K.; Zala, B. S.; Khutliwala, T. A., An insight into the emerging exopolysaccharide gellan gum as a novel polymer. Carbohydr Polym 2013, 93, 670-678. (23) López, D. N.; Galante, M.; Alvarez, E. M.; Risso, P. H.; Boeris, V., Effect of the espina corona gum on caseinate acid-induced gels. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 85, 121-128. (24) Kim, H. J.; White, P. J., Impact of the Molecular Weight, Viscosity, and Solubility of β-Glucan on in Vitro Oat Starch Digestibility. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 3270-3277. (25) Bai, Y.; Wu, P.; Wang, K.; Li, C.; Li, E.; Gilbert, R. G., Effects of pectin on molecular structural changes in starch during digestion. Food Hydrocolloid. 2017, 69, 10-18. (26) Hu, B.; Chen, Q.; Cai, Q.; Fan, Y.; Wilde, P. J.; Rong, Z.; Zeng, X., Gelation of soybean protein and polysaccharides delays digestion. Food Chem. 2017, 221, 1598-1605. (27) Soukoulis, C.; Tsevdou, M.; Andre, C. M.; Cambier, S.; Yonekura, L.; Taoukis, P. S.; Hoffmann, L., Modulation of chemical stability and in vitro bioaccessibility of beta-carotene loaded in kappa-carrageenan oil-in-gel emulsions. Food Chem. 2017, 220, 208-218. (28) Al-Yafeai, A.; Bohm, V., In Vitro Bioaccessibility of Carotenoids and Vitamin E in Rosehip Products and Tomato Paste As Affected by Pectin Contents and Food Processing. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 3801-3809. (29) Li, Z.; Dai, L.; Wang, D.; Mao, L.; Gao, Y., Stabilization and Rheology of Concentrated Emulsions Using the Natural Emulsifiers Quillaja Saponins and Rhamnolipids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 3922-3929. (30) Matia-Merino, L.; Lau, K.; Dickinson, E., Effects of low-methoxyl amidated pectin and ionic calcium on rheology and microstructure of acid-induced sodium caseinate gels. Food Hydrocolloid. 2004, 18, 271-281. (31) Makkhun, S.; Khosla, A.; Foster, T.; McClements, D. J.; Grundy, M. M.; Gray, D. A., Impact of extraneous proteins on the gastrointestinal fate of sunflower seed (Helianthus annuus) oil bodies: a simulated gastrointestinal tract study. Food Funct. 2015, 6, 125-134. (32) Chen, X.; McClements, D. J.; Wang, J.; Zou, L.; Deng, S.; Liu, W.; Yan, C.; Zhu, Y.; Cheng, C.; Liu, C., Coencapsulation of (−)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate and Quercetin in Particle-Stabilized W/O/W Emulsion Gels: Controlled Release and Bioaccessibility. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 3691-3699. (33) Guo, Q.; Bellissimo, N.; Rousseau, D., Role of gel structure in controlling in vitro intestinal lipid digestion in whey protein emulsion gels. Food Hydrocolloid. 2017, 69, 264-272. (34) McIntyre, I.; M, O. S.; D, O. R., Altering the level of calcium changes the physical properties and digestibility of casein-based emulsion gels. Food Funct. 2017, 8, 1641-1651. (35) Li, Y.; McClements, D. J., New mathematical model for interpreting pH-stat digestion profiles: impact of lipid droplet characteristics on in vitro digestibility. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 8085-8092. 24
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 25 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561
(36) Le, X. T.; Rioux, L. E.; Turgeon, S. L., Formation and functional properties of protein-polysaccharide electrostatic hydrogels in comparison to protein or polysaccharide hydrogels. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 239, 127-135. (37) McClements, D. J., Food Emulsions: Principles, Practices, and Techniques. 3rd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2015. (38) Williams, P. A.; Phillips, G. O., Gum arabic In Handbook of Hydrocolloids (Second Edition), Phillips, G. O.; Williams, P. A., Eds. Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, U.K., 2009; pp 252-273. (39) Nag, A.; Han, K.-S.; Singh, H., Microencapsulation of probiotic bacteria using pH-induced gelation of sodium caseinate and gellan gum. Int. Dairy J. 2011, 21, 247-253. (40) Yamamoto, F.; Cunha, R. L., Acid gelation of gellan: Effect of final pH and heat treatment conditions. Carbohyd. Polym. 2007, 68, 517-527. (41) Picone, C. S. F.; da Cunha, R. L., Interactions between milk proteins and gellan gum in acidified gels. Food Hydrocolloid. 2010, 24, 502-511. (42) Dickinson, E., Hydrocolloids at interfaces and the influence on the properties of dispersed systems. Food Hydrocolloid. 2003, 17, 25-39. (43) Thomar, P.; Nicolai, T., Heat-induced gelation of casein micelles in aqueous suspensions at different pH. Colloids Surf. B. Biointerfaces 2016, 146, 801-807. (44) Siew, D. C. W.; Heilmann, C.; Easteal, A. J.; Cooney, R. P., Solution and Film Properties of Sodium Caseinate/Glycerol and Sodium Caseinate/Polyethylene Glycol Edible Coating Systems. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 3432-3440. (45) Chevallier, M.; Riaublanc, A.; Lopez, C.; Hamon, P.; Rousseau, F.; Thevenot, J.; Croguennec, T., Increasing the heat stability of whey protein-rich emulsions by combining the functional role of WPM and caseins. Food Hydrocolloid. 2018, 76, 164-172. (46) Luo, Y.; Pan, K.; Zhong, Q., Casein/pectin nanocomplexes as potential oral delivery vehicles. Int. J. Pharm. 2015, 486, 59-68. (47) Chen, Y. C.; Chen, C. C.; Chen, S. T.; Hsieh, J. F., Proteomic profiling of the coagulation of milk proteins induced by glucono-delta-lactone. Food Hydrocolloid. 2016, 52, 137-143. (48) Guo, Q.; Ye, A.; Lad, M.; Dalgleish, D.; Singh, H., Effect of gel structure on the gastric digestion of whey protein emulsion gels. Soft Matter 2014, 10, 1214-1223. (49) Pinheiro, A. C.; Coimbra, M. A.; Vicente, A. A., In vitro behaviour of curcumin nanoemulsions stabilized by biopolymer emulsifiers – Effect of interfacial composition. Food Hydrocolloid. 2016, 52, 460-467. (50) Zhang, C.; Xu, W.; Jin, W.; Shah, B. R.; Li, Y.; Li, B., Influence of anionic alginate and cationic chitosan
on
physicochemical
stability
and
carotenoids
bioaccessibility
of
soy
protein
isolate-stabilized emulsions. Food Res. Int. 2015, 77, 419-425. (51) Buchweitz, M.; Kroon, P. A.; Rich, G. T.; Wilde, P. J., Quercetin solubilisation in bile salts: A comparison with sodium dodecyl sulphate. Food Chem. 2016, 211, 356-364. (52) Ortega, N.; Reguant, J.; Romero, M.-P.; Macia, A.; Motilva, M.-J., Effect of fat content on the digestibility and bioaccessibility of cocoa polyphenol by an in vitro digestion model. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 5743-5749. (53) Mun, S.; Kim, Y. R.; McClements, D. J., Control of beta-carotene bioaccessibility using starch-based filled hydrogels. Food Chem. 2015, 173, 454-461. 25
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 26 of 41
562
26
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 27 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
563
Funding
564
The authors are grateful for the financial support of this study by the National
565
Natural Science Foundation of China (31601468 and 21766018), Major Discipline
566
Academic
567
(20162BCB22009), the Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi
568
Province, China (20171ACB20005), Open Project Program of State Key Laboratory
569
of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University (SKLF-ZZB-201717), the
570
Postgraduate Innovation Fund of Jiangxi Province (YC2017-B010) and the
571
Postgraduate Innovation Fund of Nanchang University (cx2017127).
572
Notes
573
Technical Leader
Training
Plan
Project
of
Jiangxi
Province
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
574
27
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 28 of 41
575
FIGURE CAPTIONS
576
Figure 1. Illustration of the experimental setup for the production of fluid and gelled
577
nutraceutical emulsions. GDL = glucono-delta-lactone.
578
Figure 2. Compatibility of natural polysaccharides with emulsions under neutral
579
conditions. Gel = gellan gum, Ara = arabic gum, Pec = pectin, Car = carrageenan,
580
Xan = xanthan gum.
581
Figure 3. (a) Elastic modulus, (b) Loss modulus, (C) Loss factor and (d) pH value of
582
casein-stabilized emulsions with different gellan gum content (0% - 0.3%) change as
583
a function of time during acidification process (glucono-delta-lactone was added
584
into emulsion samples at 0 h) .
585
Figure 4. Visual images of fluid and gelled nutraceutical emulsions (after
586
acidification for 12 h) with different gellan gum content (0% - 0.3%).
587
Figure 5. Confocal fluorescence microscopy observations of fluid and gelled
588
nutraceutical emulsions (after acidification for 12 h) with different gellan gum
589
content (0% - 0.3%). (a) Oil stain (excitation at 488 nm); (b) Protein stain (excitation
590
at 633 nm); (c) Combined image of a and b.
591
Figure 6. SDS-PAGE profile of sodium caseinate (lane 1, standard marker; lane 2,
592
sodium caseinate; lane 3, fluid nutraceutical emulsions with 0% gellan gum; lane 4,
593
fluid nutraceutical emulsions with 0.1% gellan gum; lane 5, fluid nutraceutical
594
emulsions with 0.2% gellan gum; lane 6, gelled nutraceutical emulsions with 0%
595
gellan gum; lane 7, gelled nutraceutical emulsions with 0.1% gellan gum; lane 8, 28
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 29 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
596
gelled nutraceutical emulsions with 0.2% gellan gum).
597
Figure 7. SDS-PAGE profile of the in vitro gastric digestion of sodium caseinate: (a)
598
fluid nutraceutical emulsions with 0% gellan gum; (b) fluid nutraceutical emulsions
599
with 0.1% gellan gum; (c) fluid nutraceutical emulsions with 0.2% gellan gum; (d)
600
gelled nutraceutical emulsions with 0% gellan gum; (e) gelled nutraceutical
601
emulsions with 0.1% gellan gum; (f) gelled nutraceutical emulsions with 0.2%
602
gellan gum (lane 1, standard marker; lane 2, sodium caseinate; lane 3-8, digested for
603
2, 5, 10, 30, 60, and 120 min).
604
Figure 8. Free fatty acids (FFA) release profile for fluid and gelled nutraceutical
605
emulsions (F-0%, fluid nutraceutical emulsions with 0% gellan gum; F-0.1%, fluid
606
nutraceutical emulsions with 0.1% gellan gum; F-0.2%, fluid nutraceutical
607
emulsions with 0.2% gellan gum; G-0%, Gelled nutraceutical emulsions with 0%
608
gellan gum; G-0.1%, Gelled nutraceutical emulsions with 0.1% gellan gum; G-0.2%,
609
Gelled nutraceutical emulsions with 0.2% gellan gum).
610
Figure 9. (a) Bioaccessibility of quercetin (QT) in fluid and gelled nutraceutical
611
emulsions; (b) Visual images of digesta from different gastrointestinal stage (F-0%,
612
fluid nutraceutical emulsions with 0% gellan gum; F-0.1%, fluid nutraceutical
613
emulsions with 0.1% gellan gum; F-0.2%, fluid nutraceutical emulsions with 0.2%
614
gellan gum; G-0%, Gelled nutraceutical emulsions with 0% gellan gum; G-0.1%,
615
Gelled nutraceutical emulsions with 0.1% gellan gum; G-0.2%, Gelled nutraceutical
616
emulsions with 0.2% gellan gum). Samples designated with different lowercase 29
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
617
Page 30 of 41
superscripts (a, b, c…) mean significantly different (Duncan, p < 0.05).
618
30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 31 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Tables Table 1. Impact of pH on the Zeta-potential of Gellan Gum and Fluid Emulsions with Different Gellan Gum Contents (0% - 0.3 %). α Zeta potential (mV) pH
α
0%
0.1%
0.2%
0.3%
gellan gum
2
23.5±0.8 e A
24.1±0.3 e A
24.2±0.6 d A
25.7±1.0 d A
-3.0±0.6 c
3
35.9±0.6 f A
36.5±0.5 f A
41.7±1.3 e B
40.5±2.4 e B
-33.5±1.0 b
4
16.4±0.3 d B
13.5±1.2 d A
23.3±0.5 d C
23.4±0.4 d C
-47.6±4.6 a
5
-16.4±0.3 c A
-24.9±1.1 c C
-21.7±0.3 c B
-21.1±0.4 c B
-48.0±4.7 a
6
-33.4±0.6 b A
-39.8±1.2 b B
-40.6±1.0 b B
-44.4±4.9 a B
-41.1±4.9 a
7
-45.3±1.6 a B
-49.3±1.6 a C
-46.1±1.6 a B
-36.4±0.9 b A
-43.3±5.0 a
Different lowercase letters (a, b, c) in the same column or different capital letters
(A, B, C) in the same row for each parameter were significantly different (Duncan, p < 0.05).
31
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 32 of 41
Figure 1
32
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 33 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 2
33
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 34 of 41
Figure 3
34
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 35 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 4
35
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 36 of 41
Figure 5
36
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 37 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 6
37
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 38 of 41
Figure 7
38
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 39 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 8
39
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 40 of 41
Figure 9
40
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 41 of 41
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Table of Contents Graphic
41
ACS Paragon Plus Environment