Subscriber access provided by Kaohsiung Medical University
Food and Beverage Chemistry/Biochemistry
Hydrophobic Ethylcellulose/Gelatin Nanofibers Containing Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles for Antimicrobial Packaging Yuyu Liu, Yang Li, LingLi Deng, Lin Zou, Fengqin Feng, and Hui Zhang J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b03267 • Publication Date (Web): 23 Aug 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on August 25, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Hydrophobic Ethylcellulose/Gelatin Nanofibers Containing Zinc Oxide
2
Nanoparticles for Antimicrobial Packaging
3 4
Yuyu Liu, Yang Li, Lingli Deng, Lin Zou, Fengqin Feng, Hui Zhang *
5 6
College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Fuli Institute of Food Science, Zhejiang Key
7
Laboratory for Agro-Food Processing, Zhejiang R&D Center for Food Technology and Equipment,
8
Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
9 10
* E-mail:
[email protected]. Phone: +86-571-88982981. Fax: +86-571-88982981.
11
1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
12
Abstract
13
The ethylcellulose/gelatin solutions containing various concentrations of zinc oxide (ZnO)
14
nanoparticles were electrospun, and the resultant nanofibers were characterized by scanning
15
electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray, X-ray photoelectron spectrometer, X-ray diffraction,
16
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, mechanical testing, water contact angle, and water stability.
17
Results indicated that ZnO nanoparticles acting as fillers interacted with polymers, resulting in the
18
enhanced surface hydrophobicity and water stability of nanofibers. The antibacterial assay showed a
19
concentration-dependent effect of ZnO on the viabilities of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus
20
aureus. Notably, the antimicrobial efficiency of the 1.5 wt% ZnO-containing fibers against S.
21
aureus was 43.7%, but increased to 62.5% after UV irradiation at 364 nm, possibly due to the
22
significantly increased amounts of intracellular reactive oxygen species. These results suggested
23
that the ZnO-containing nanofibers with excellent surface hydrophobicity, water stability and
24
antimicrobial activity exhibited potential uses in food packaging.
25
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 37
Page 3 of 37
26
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
TOC Graphic
27 28
Keywords
29
electrospinning, ethylcellulose, gelatin, ZnO, antibacterial activity, UV irradiation
30
3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
31
Introduction
32
Packaging has been widely used in food and beverages to maintain their quality and safety, and
33
to reduce food waste.1 Except for the basic role in acting as inert barrier to external conditions, the
34
ability to protect products from microbial contamination is preferred in food packaging, since
35
microbial spoilage is responsible for shortened shelf life and degraded food quality.2-4 Antimicrobial
36
packaging is reported as one of the most effective approaches to restrain multiplication of
37
microorganisms by incorporating antimicrobial substances in the packaging systems.3 Due to the
38
extensive antimicrobial activity, high specific surface area, and ability to improve mechanical
39
properties of matrix, metal oxide nanoparticles are promising antibacterial agents in food
40
packaging.5, 6 However, the potential toxicity of nanoparticles is an important obstacle in food
41
applications.7 Zinic oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles as GRAS approved food additive have attracted an
42
increasing interest in food packaging not only due to the excellent antimicrobial ability but also for
43
the desired mechanical performance and the minimum impact on human cells.5, 8 Notably, as a
44
photocatalytic material, UV illumination can induce the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS)
45
on the surface of ZnO nanoparticles, leading to enhanced bioactivity due to the fact that the ROS
46
may penetrate into the cells and cause damage to bacteria.9 Li et al. detected the generation of ROS
47
on surface of ZnO nanoparticles under UV (365 nm) irradiation, and indicated that the higher the
48
total ROS concentration, the more significant the antibacterial activity.10
49
Encapsulation of metal oxide nanoparticles into polymers is a promising approach to enhance
50
the antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles due to the improved stability and sustained release.11
51
Electrospinning has been thought to be of great suitability in encapsulating active compounds in
52
food polymers and biopolymers, since it is a versatile and simple technique to fabricate functional 4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 37
Page 5 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
53
fibrous membranes with high porosity and surface-to-volume ratio, and improved stability and
54
mechanical strength.2 The enhanced dispersion of metal oxide nanoparticles was reported by
55
Mayorga
56
(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate), and the resultant electrospun fiber mats showed the
57
enhanced antimicrobial activity against Salmonella enterica and Listeria monocytogenes.11
58
Augustine et al. observed that the addition of 5 wt% ZnO nanoparticles in the electrospun
59
polycaprolactone nanofibers enhanced the mechanical stability as well as the antibacterial
60
properties against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus.12
et
al.
through
incorporating
CuO
nanoparticles
into
poly
61
Additionally, the encapsulation matrices for food packaging should be regarded as safe. The
62
active loading based on gelatin nanofibers has been widely fabricated through electrospinning
63
owing to its desirable biodegradability and biocompatibility.13 Ultrafine gelatin/nisin fiber mats with
64
antimicrobial activity against S. aureus and L. monocytogenes were reported by Dheraprasart et al.13
65
The gelatin-based electrospun fibrous membranes displaying remarkable antibacterial properties
66
against E. coli and S. aureus were produced by Padrao et al. with fish gelatin as structural matrix
67
and bovine lactoferrin as the active antimicrobial agent.14 On the other hand, elements such as
68
excellent hydrophobicity to block the entry of water and moisture are necessary for packaging.7 Our
69
recent work suggested that due to the advantageous properties of safety, electrospinability and
70
hydrophobicity, blending ethylcellulose with gelatin is an ideal approach to overcome the natural
71
hydrophilicity of gelatin based fibers, rendering the improved water stability.15
72
In this study, before electrospinning the ethylcellulose/gelatin solutions containing various
73
levels of ZnO nanoparticles were evaluated by viscosity and zeta potential measurements. The
74
resultant fibers were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive 5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
75
X-ray (EDX), X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform
76
infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), mechanical testing, water contact angle (WCA), and water stability.
77
The antibacterial activities of the nanofibers were tested against E. coli and S. aureus based on disc
78
diffusion technique. Subsequently, the fiber mat containing 1.5 wt% ZnO nanoparticles was selected
79
for analyzing the impact of UV irradiation on the antimicrobial viability using culture turbidity
80
method.
81
MATERIALS AND METHODS
82
Materials. Ethylcellulose (3-7 cP, MW, 20-30 kDa), gelatin of type B (Bloom 250, MW, 100 kDa)
83
and zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles with particle size of 30 nm were supplied by Aladdin, Inc.
84
(Shanghai, China). Absolute ethanol (Sinopharm), acetic acid (99.8%, Sinopharm), and deionized
85
water were used for solution preparations. All reagents were utilized as received.
86
Solution preparation. Solutions were prepared by dissolving 15 wt% (w/v) ethylcellulose and 15
87
wt% (w/v) gelatin into water/ethanol/acetic acid at a volume ratio of 2/2/6. Subsequently, ZnO
88
nanoparticles were added at concentrations of 0 wt%, 1 wt%, 1.5 wt%, and 2 wt% (w/v), which
89
were denoted as Z0-EG, Z1-EG, Z1.5-EG, and Z2-EG, respectively. Thus, the theoretical mass
90
fraction of ZnO regarded to polymers was 0%, 3.2%, 4.8% and 6.3%, respectively. The solutions
91
were gently stirred for 1 h at 60 °C and then vigorously stirred for 2 h at 25 °C prior to
92
electrospinning.
93
Rheology and zeta potential. Rheology was characterized using an Anton Paar MCR302
94
rheometer (Anton Paar, Austria, QC) at 25 °C with a scanning frequency from 1 to 100 rad/s using 1%
95
strain. The complex viscosity at a shear rate of 1 rad/s was taken as the average solution viscosity.
96
Zeta potential was measured using a dynamic light scattering instrument (Malvern, Zetasizer Nano 6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 37
Page 7 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
97
ZS90, UK) at 25 °C. Triplicate measurements were performed.
98
Electrospinning. The fabrication of nanofibers by electrospinning was according to our previous
99
studies.15 4 mL solution was pumped into a 5 mL syringe with a 20-gauge needle. A high-voltage
100
power supply (Gamma High Voltage) was employed to generate a voltage up to 15 kV. A pump
101
(LSP02-1B, Baoding Longer Precision Pump Co., Ltd., China) provided a constant flow rate of 1.0
102
mL/h. The resultant fibers were collected on a grounded cylindrical aluminum foil at a distance of
103
100 mm away from the needle at 25 °C with a humidity of 50%. The thickness of the fibers was in
104
the range of 200-300 µm measured by a thickness meter (C640, Labthink, China).
105
Morphology and element mapping. The morphology observation was carried out using a field
106
emission scanning electron microscope (SEM, SU8010, Hitachi, Japan). Nano Measure software
107
was applied to measure the fiber diameter of 120 fibers at random from SEM images. To observe
108
the distribution of Zn element, the fibers were analyzed by energy dispersive X-ray (EDX, SU8010,
109
Hitachi, Japan) at a working depth of 5 µm.
110
X-ray photoelectron spectrometer. The surface atomic composition of fibers was examined by
111
X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS, AXIS SUPRA, Kratos) using Al Kα X-ray source (1486.6
112
eV) with a standard working depth of 10 nm. Wide scan spectra were recorded from 1000 to 0 eV.
113
The scan steps of wide scan spectra and high-resolution spectra were 1.0 eV and 0.1 eV,
114
respectively. The atom percentage was calculated using Speclab software, and the curve fitting of
115
high-resolution C 1s spectra was analyzed by Origin pro9 software. The spectra calibration was
116
based on setting the C-C/C-H contribution in the C 1s emission at 284.8 eV.16
117
X-ray diffraction. The X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker D8 ADVACNCE, Germany) was
118
performed using Cu Kα (1.5406 Å) radiation at a scanning rate of 1 °/min ranging from 4° to 80°. 7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
119
The average spacing of the peak was calculated as follow:17
d =
0.9λ (1) β cos
120
where λ, β, and θ represent X-ray wavelength (1.541), full width of half maximum (FWHM) and
121
the Bragg diffraction angle, respectively.
122
Fourier transform infrared spectrometer. The Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR,
123
AVA TAR 370) spectra were obtained by mixing nanofiber mats with KBr. The resolution of
124
spectra was 4 cm−1 with 16 scans, and the measurement range was from 4000 to 400 cm−1.
125
Mechanical testing. The tensile properties were measured at 25 °C using an electron testing
126
machine (Zwick GmbH & Co.KG, China). The fiber mats were cut into 5 mm × 30 mm stripes,
127
with thickness of 200 ± 50 µm measured by a thickness meter (C640, Labthink, China). The
128
stress-stain curves of the mats were recorded to determine the elastic modulus, tensile strength, and
129
elongation at break. Five tests were performed for each sample.
130
Water contact angle. The water contact angle (WCA) was measured at 25 °C using a surface
131
tension meter (DCAT-21, Delta Phase, Germany). Milli-Q water was dropped on the fiber surface,
132
and the images were captured by a camera system. Three random spots were measured for each
133
sample.
134
Water stability. The water stability measurements of the fibers were conducted by following the
135
procedure of our previous method.15 The disc-shaped fiber mats (D0=11 mm) were first determined
136
(W0) before immersed in water at 25 °C with a shaking speed at 150 rpm for 24 h. After immersion,
137
the fiber diameter (DT) was measured, followed by weighing the mats before (Ww) and after (WD)
138
drying at 60 °C for 1 h, respectively. The surface swelling (SW), water-uptake capacity (WT), and
139
weight loss (WL) were calculated by the equations: 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 37
Page 9 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
D −D (2) D W − W W = (3) W W − W W = × 100% (4) W S =
140
Inhibitory zone evaluation. The antibacterial activities of the fibers with different ZnO levels
141
against Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) and Staphylococcus aureus (CMCC 26003) were measured
142
using a disc diffusion method.18 The cells (~105 CFU/mL) of each pathogen were prepared by the
143
serial dilution method. 0.1 mL diluent was spread on agar media using a triangular metal rod. The
144
disc-shaped fibers with a diameter of 11 mm (2-3 mg) were sterilized by UV for 1 h before being
145
adhered to the medium. After incubation for 24 h at 37 °C, the inhibitory zone was measured to
146
estimate the sensitivity of bacteria to fibers. Three replications were performed for each sample.
147
Bactericidal kinetics after UV irradiation. The Z1.5-EG fibrous mat was selected to analyze the
148
antibacterial activity after UV irradiation (364 nm, 250 W), using a culture turbidity method.10, 18 11
149
mg of the sterilized mat was added into tubes containing 20 mL culture medium. One set of tubes
150
was exposed to UV for 1 h, and the other set was protected from light for 1 h. After treatment, 0.2
151
mL of each bacterial suspension (106 CFU/mL) was added, and then incubated in the shaker
152
platform (150 rpm, 37 °C). The growth of bacteria was monitored at an interval of 2 h for 24 h by a
153
microplate reader (MDS ANALYTICAL, America). Medium with only inoculum or the fibrous mat
154
without ZnO (Z0-EG) was used as negative control or positive control, respectively. All
155
experiments were performed in triplicate. The inhibition efficiency (IE) was calculated as follows:
IE =
OD#" − OD$" OD#"
× 100% (5)
156
where OD#" and OD$" were the OD600 values of culture medium without and with the fiber mat
157
at time t, respectively. 9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
158
In order to estimate the generation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) caused by
159
ZnO nanoparticles under UV irradiation, the above E. coli suspensions after 24 h of exposure to
160
fibers were used to quantify the ROS level within the cells by the method provided by Najim et al.19
161
After incubation, the cells were collected by centrifugation and suspended with PBS. The resultant
162
solutions were mixed with 2,7-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA, sigma, USA) at a volume
163
ratio of 2000:1 for 45 min at 37 °C under dark conditions. The fluorescence intensity of DCFH was
164
measured by fluorescence spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices, China) at an excitation and
165
emission wavelength of 488 nm and 535 nm, respectively.
166
Statistical analysis. The experimental results were presented as mean plus or minus standard
167
deviation. The statistical evaluation was carried out using Origin pro9 software via one-way
168
ANOVA with analysis of variance at the 0.05 significance level.
169
Results and Discussion
170
Solution rheology and zeta potential. As listed in Table 1, the apparent viscosities of the
171
ethylcellulose/gelatin solutions without (Z0-EG) and with 1 wt% (Z1-EG), 1.5 wt% (Z1.5-EG), and
172
2 wt% (Z2-EG) ZnO nanoparticles were 2.05, 1.77, 1.30 and 1.78 Pa s, respectively. Obviously, the
173
solutions became less viscous after the addition of ZnO nanoparticles, while the viscosity of the
174
Z2-EG solution gave a significant (p < 0.05) rise compared with that of the Z1.5-EG solution. A
175
viscosity decrease after adding AgNO3 into poly (vinyl pyrrolidone)/cellulose nanocrystals systems
176
was observed by Huang et al., who owed the changes to the competition between polymers and Ag+,
177
leading to destruction of some intramolecular or intermolecular hydrogen bonds in polymers.20 An
178
interpenetrating network among ethylcellulose and gelatin through interactions such as hydrogen
179
bonds has been proposed previously.15 Therefore, it could be assumed that the ZnO nanoparticles 10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 37
Page 11 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
180
probably acting as fillers were dispersed in the network by blocking interactions among polymers,
181
resulting in the decreased viscosity. However, the increased viscosity of the Z2-EG solution could
182
be an indicator of aggregation of ZnO nanoparticles at a higher concentration. Augustine et al.
183
suggested that with the concentration of ZnO nanoparticles up to 2 wt% in polycaprolactone
184
solution, particle agglomeration encountered, leading to high solution viscosity and apparently
185
increased fiber diameter.12
186
The solutions of 0%, 1%, 1.5%, and 2% ZnO nanoparticles without polymers displayed zeta
187
potential values of 3.89, 6.98, 5.73, and 3.94 mV, respectively. The lower zeta potential value of 2%
188
ZnO solution might be due to the formation of ZnO aggregates. Meanwhile, the zeta potential
189
values of the Z0-EG, Z1-EG, Z1.5-EG, and Z2-EG solutions were 1.47, 1.08, 0.87, and 1.00 mV,
190
respectively. Matusiak et al. reported that in the case of polymer and oxide systems, adsorption of
191
the polymer on oxide surface could change the zeta potential of the bulk.21 Yu et al. ascribed the
192
zeta potential changes of ZnO-containing matrix to the interaction effect between nanoparticles and
193
polymers.22 Thus, the observed decrease in zeta potential values of ZnO nanoparticles after
194
introduced into the ethylcellulose/gelatin solutions could be a result of interactions between ZnO
195
and the absorbed polymers. Additionally, the zeta potential of Z2-EG solution was slightly higher
196
than that of the Z1.5-EG solution, probably resulting from the reduced interactions caused by
197
aggregates of ZnO nanoparticles at a higher concentration.
198
Nanofiber morphology and element mapping. SEM images in Figure 1 (A-D) showed that the
199
fibers without ZnO nanoparticles (Z0-EG) were smooth with an average diameter of 500 nm. The
200
diameters of fibers with ZnO nanoparticles (Z1-EG, Z1.5-EG and Z2-EG) were 588, 640 and 804
201
nm, respectively, without any visually observed morphology changes, indicating the homogenous 11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
202
distribution of ZnO nanoparticles within the fibers.23 It is universally accepted that the high zeta
203
potential value is responsible for strong electrostatic force.20 During electrospinning, the
204
electrostatic force acting as a strong drag force fights on the jet, leading to strong elongation of jet
205
and generation of uniform and thin fibers.15 Thus, the reduced zeta potential values of solutions
206
after the ZnO introduction played a major role in the formation of thicker fibers. Figure 1 (E-J)
207
presented the EDX analysis and Zn element mapping of the Z0-EG, Z1-EG and Z2-EG fibers,
208
respectively. Obviously, all the fibers showed the presence of C, N, O, while the signals of Zn
209
element were detected in the ZnO-containing fibers. Figure 1 (H) exhibited a highly Zn dispersion
210
in the Z1-EG fibers, indicating good system compatibility.24 On the other hand, the increased Zn
211
distribution density and slight aggregates were observed for the Z2-EG fibers in Figure 1 (J),
212
validating the interpretation of viscosity changes proposed in solution rheology characterization.
213
X-ray photoelectron spectrometer. To evaluate the chemical composition of the fiber surface, the
214
XPS analysis was conducted and the results were displayed in Figure 2 and Table 2. The wide scan
215
spectra showed the presence of C, N and O atoms in each fiber mat, and the typical peak of Zn was
216
observed except the Z0-EG fibers. The high resolution scan of Zn element exhibited two peaks at
217
1020 and 1043 eV assigned to Zn (2p3/2) and Zn (2p3/2),25 confirming the existence of Zn element in
218
the Z1-EG, Z1.5-EG and Z2-EG fibers, respectively. The high resolution XPS spectra for C 1s
219
revealed that two peaks at 284.8 eV and 286.4 eV corresponding to C-C and C-O existed in all the
220
fiber samples, but another small peak at 288.1 eV related to C=O was only observed for the Z2-EG
221
fibers.26
222
As summarized in Table 2, the N atom percentage values for the Z0-EG, Z1-EG, Z1.5-EG and
223
Z2-EG fibers were 7.3%, 6.9%, 5.8% and 5.2%, respectively, indicating the decreased N content on 12
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 37
Page 13 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
224
the fiber surface with the increasing ZnO concentration. The calculated ratio of surface Zn regarded
225
to theoretical content was 47.6% for the Z1-EG fibers, 46.9% for the Z1.5-EG fibers but 71.4% for
226
the Z2-EG fibers, implying a higher ZnO content on the Z2-EG fiber surface. The decreased N but
227
increased Zn content on the fiber surface suggested the replacement of hydrophilic groups by
228
hydrophobic ZnO nanoparticles, contributing to the improved surface hydrophobicity.27
229
X-ray diffraction. The XRD spectra of the fabricated nanofibers as well as the ZnO nanoparticles
230
were shown in Figure 3 and Table 3. It was evident that there was an extra peak at 31.82° in the
231
case of the fibers containing 2 wt% ZnO nanoparticles (Z2-EG), consistent with the typical
232
crystalline peak of ZnO nanoparticles assigned to the (100) plane.28 This implied the presence of
233
ZnO aggregates in the Z2-EG fibers, which was in agreement with our EDX analysis. Generally,
234
ethylcellulose possesses two crystalline reflections at 2θ = 7.8° and 2θ = 20.3°, and gelatin has a
235
broad diffraction peak in the 2θ range around 20°.29, 30 Figure 3 indicated that the second reflection
236
at around 20° became less prominent after the addition of ZnO nanoparticles, and the calculated d
237
spacing value of the fibers without ZnO nanoparticles (Z0-EG) in Table 3 was increased from 0.222
238
to 0.289, 0.292 and 0.336 after the addition of 1 wt% (Z1-EG), 1.5 wt% (Z1.5-EG), and 2 wt%
239
(Z2-EG) ZnO nanoparticles, respectively. Li et al. demonstrated that the decreased peak intensity
240
and increased d value implied a less compact structure of the composite system.31 Thus, these
241
results suggested that the higher amounts of ZnO nanoparticles, the less compact structure of the
242
polymer network, which might be due to some destroyed intramolecular or intermolecular
243
interactions of polymers caused by the ZnO addition.
244
Fourier transform infrared spectrometer. It can be seen from Figure 4 that some characteristic
245
absorption peaks of the fibers without ZnO nanoparticles (Z0-EG) were observed at 3385 cm−1, 13
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
246
1651 cm−1, 1538 cm−1, and 1446 cm−1, related to O-H bending, C=O stretching (amide I), N-H/C-N
247
stretching (amide II), respectively.29 In contrast, the ZnO-containing fibers (Z1-EG, Z1.5-EG and
248
Z2-EG) showed a new peak at 667 cm−1 assigned to the metal-oxygen (M-O) stretching mode,28
249
indicating the existence of ZnO nanoparticles. Additionally, the fibers containing ZnO nanoparticles
250
exhibited the decreased intensities of the amide II bands, especially an almost nonexistent peak at
251
1446 cm−1. Generally, the higher the intensity of amide band, the more number of the triple helix
252
structures gelatin chains have.32 Therefore, the observed changes indicated the loss of triple helix
253
state linked by hydrogen bonds, which evidenced the destruction of gelatin molecular interactions
254
after introduction of ZnO nanoparticles.
255
Mechanical testing. The tensile properties of the fiber mats including average elastic modulus (E),
256
tensile strength (σy) and elongation at break (εb) were listed in Table 4. The fiber mats without ZnO
257
(Z0-EG) possessed E, σy and εb of 148.10 MPa, 1.70 MPa and 1.30%, respectively. After the ZnO
258
addition ranging from 1 - 1.5 wt%, these values increased with the highest E (203.24 MPa), σy (2.42
259
MPa) and εb (1.57%) observed for the Z1.5-EG fibers. It was reported that dispersion of fillers and
260
filler-matrix interactions were the dominant factors in determining mechanical performance of
261
polymer composites. The enhancement in tensile properties was indicators of good nanoparticle
262
dispersion and strong interfacial interactions.4 However, the fibers containing 2 wt% ZnO presented
263
a slight decrease in E (134.28 MPa), σy (1.65 MPa) and εb (0.98%) compared with the Z0-EG fibers.
264
In the case of ZnO loaded cellulose films reported by Zhao et al., the 7.4 wt% ZnO addition led to
265
decreased εb values compared with pure cellulose films, which was attributed to the poor dispersion
266
of ZnO in cellulose matrix caused by formation of agglomerates at higher concentrations.8 Thus,
267
our results indicated that the addition of ZnO at a concentration below 1.5 wt% might improve the 14
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 37
Page 15 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
268
mechanical properties of fibers, while a tendency of formation of agglomerates at a higher
269
concentration (2 wt%) could lead to a poor mechanical performance.
270
Water contact angle. The results of water contact angle (WCA) recorded at 1 s, 5 s and 15 s were
271
displayed in Figure 5. The WCA of the fibers without ZnO nanoparticles (Z0-EG) was 119.3° at 1 s,
272
lower than the values of the Z1-EG (129.7°), Z1.5-EG (134.0°) and Z2-EG (128.5°) fibers. Anitha
273
et al. observed that the wetting property of the cellulose acetate fibers changed from hydrophilic
274
(47°) to hydrophobic (124°) after impregnating ZnO.33 Hydrophobicity is largely dependent on the
275
surface morphology and chemical structure.34 Considering the reduced N atom percentage on
276
nanofiber surface by introduction of ZnO nanoparticles from the XPS analysis, the improved
277
surface hydrophobicity could be a result of the decreased number of gelatin chains distributed on
278
surface, since N element was the characteristic element of gelatin in the fiber matrix. Additionally,
279
the presence of the hydrophilic group (C=O) of the Z2-EG fibers observed in the XPS spectrum for
280
C 1s might give an explanation to the decreased WCA value, compared to the other ZnO-containing
281
nanofibers. The Z0-EG, Z1-EG, Z1.5-EG and Z2-EG fibers gave the WCA values of 109.5°, 117.5°,
282
130.0° and 122.1° at 15 s showing a 9.8°, 12.2°, 4.0° and 5.4° reduction compared to the initial
283
values, suggesting the higher water stability at higher ZnO levels. Thus, the introduction of ZnO
284
nanoparticles into fibers effectively strengthened the surface hydrophobic property, which was
285
suitable for packaging materials to inhibit water penetration.7
286
Water stability. As presented in Table 5, the fibers without ZnO nanoparticles (Z0-EG) gave the
287
highest water-uptake capacity (WT) value of 536.41%, compared with the Z1-EG (297.9%),
288
Z1.5-EG (209.31%) and Z2-EG (203.61%) fibers, respectively. The lower gelatin content on the
289
fiber surface supported the remarkably decreased WT values of the ZnO-containing fibers due to the 15
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
290
fact that the lower the gelatin content, the less the hydrophilic groups to absorb water molecules.35 It
291
was obvious that the surface swelling (SW) and weight loss (WL) displayed a similar trend with the
292
WT value, the higher the ZnO concentration the lower the values. Notably, the SW and WL values of
293
the Z0-EG and Z1-EG fibers were much higher than those of the Z1.5-EG and Z2-EG fibers. By
294
comparing the surface dimensional stability of pure chitosan or gelatin fibers with its binary
295
scaffolds containing hydrophobic polycaprolactone, Gomes et al. reported much lower SW values
296
for binary scaffolds due to the increased surface hydrophobicity caused by polycaprolactone.36 Our
297
results indicated that the enhanced hydrophobicity of the ZnO-containing fibers provided by WCA
298
analysis contributed to the improved water stability. These parameters were related to dislocations
299
or blistering and sensitivity to water, which was necessary for using as food package and coating
300
films.35, 37
301
Inhibitory zone evaluation. Table 6 summarized the inhibitory diameters of the nanofibers against
302
E. coli and S. aureus. The fibers without ZnO (Z0-EG) as control showed absence of antimicrobial
303
activity, while the fibers containing 1 wt%, 1.5 wt% and 2 wt% ZnO nanoparticles showed the
304
inhibitory diameters of 0.69, 1.30, 1.61 mm/mg against E. coli and 0.75, 1.17, 1.33 mm/mg against
305
S. aureus, respectively. These results indicated that the bacteria inhibition displayed a dose-effect
306
manner, and E. coli was observed to be more susceptible than S. aureus. Xu et al. revealed that the
307
addition of 2 wt% AgNO3 endowed the gelatin fibers with an inhibition zone of 1.6 mm against S.
308
aureus and 2.5 mm against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and attributed the antimicrobial activity
309
difference to the thinner cell wall of P. aeruginosa.18 The similar results were also reported by
310
Kanmani et al., who suggested that the thicker and complex peptidoglycan structure of Gram
311
positive bacterial obstructed the nanoparticles penetration, while a negatively charged and thinner 16
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 37
Page 17 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
312
peptidoglycan layer facilitated the nanoparticles transport.38
313
Bactericidal kinetics after UV irradiation. The growth curves of E. coli and S. aureus in Figure 6
314
(A) consisted of three phases: lag phase, exponential phase, and stabilization phase. Under exposure
315
to the different fibers, no reduction in cell viability was observed between the positive (Z0-EG
316
fibers) and negative control, while substantial decrease at exponential phase was obvious for the
317
fibers containing 1.5 wt% ZnO nanoparticles (Z1.5-EG). Notably, the Z1.5-EG fibers after UV
318
irradiation for 1 h (denoted as UV Z1.5-EG) was found to exhibit a higher antimicrobial activity
319
than the light protection for 1 h (denoted as Dark Z1.5-EG), as indicated by the lower OD600 value
320
at each time interval. From Figure 6 (B), the inhibition efficiency of the Z1.5-EG fibers against
321
either E. coli or S. aureus firstly increased, and then decreased significantly as the incubation time
322
prolonged. Finally, no significant difference of the inhibition efficiency between the Z1.5-EG fibers
323
and negative control was observed at stationary phase. The highest inhibition efficiency values of
324
the UV Z1.5-EG and Dark Z1.5-EG were 98.4% and 98.0% against E. coli, and 62.5% and 43.7%
325
against S. aureus, respectively, suggesting a more efficient antibacterial activity after UV irradiation.
326
This suggested that UV irradiation was an effective way to enhance the bacteriostatic performance
327
of the prepared ZnO-containing nanofibers.
328
It was proposed that the increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production from ZnO under
329
UV irradiation resulted in the enhanced antibacterial activity due to the high reactivity and
330
oxidizing property of ROS.9 Thus, the E. coli suspensions after exposure to fibers for 24 h were
331
selected to detect the ROS concentration, and the results expressed as percentages of the value
332
against negative control were presented in Figure 6 (C). A significant difference of fluorescence
333
intensity was observed after exposure with the highest value (166%) for the UV Z1.5-EG fibers 17
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
334
while the lowest value (130%) for the Z0-EG fibers, indicating the higher intracellular ROS levels
335
of the ZnO-containing fibers after exposure to UV light. The similar results were also reported by Li
336
et al., who demonstrated that under UV irradiation (365 nm), ZnO nanoparticles generated three
337
types of ROS, and the more the total ROS concentration, the higher the antibacterial activity against
338
E. coli.10
339
In summary, the present work demonstrated that ZnO nanoparticles were successfully
340
encapsulated in the ethylcellulose/gelatin nanofibers through electrospinning. Generally, ZnO
341
nanoparticles were homogeneously dispersed and did not change the fiber morphology, due to the
342
fact that ZnO nanoparticles acting as fillers destroyed intramolecular or intermolecular interactions
343
among polymers and instead formed new interactions with polymers. It was confirmed that the
344
ZnO-containing fibers exhibited the enhanced surface hydrophobicity and water stability owing to
345
the decreased gelatin distribution on fiber surface caused by the ZnO addition. The introduction of
346
ZnO nanoparticles endowed the ethylcellulose/gelatin nanofibers with the improved mechanical
347
properties and concentration-dependent antibacterial properties against E. coli and S. aureus.
348
Additionally, UV irradiation enabled the increased antibacterial efficiency of the fibers containing
349
1.5% ZnO nanoparticles from 43.7% to 62.5% against S. aureus. These results suggested that the
350
ZnO-containing nanofibers with excellent hydrophobicity, water stability and antibacterial
351
performance may have promising applications as food packaging materials.
352
Acknowledgement
353
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.
354
31772013).
355
Conflict of interest 18
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 37
Page 19 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
356 357
References
358
(1)
359
with a Consideration of Opportunities for Developing Countries. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2011,
360
22, 604-610.
361
(2)
362
Potential Food Based Applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 38, 21-33.
363
(3)
364
Antimicrobial Films in Food Applications. Food Chem. 2009, 114, 1173-1182.
365
(4)
366
with Improved Mechanical, Barrier and Antibacterial Properties. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15,
367
10950-10973.
368
(5)
369
Poly(Ethylene Oxide) and Zno Nanoparticles on the Morphology, Tensile and Thermal Properties of
370
Cellulose Acetate Nanocomposite Fibrous Film. Polym. J. 2011, 43, 978-986.
371
(6)
372
Innovative Packaging Material for Meat and Meat-Products. J. Food Sci. Technol.-Mysore 2015, 52,
373
4600-4606.
374
(7)
375
Characterization of Phb/Pbat-Based Biodegradable Antibacterial Hydrophobic Nanofibrous
376
Membranes. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2018, 29, 481-489.
377
(8)
Bradley, E. L.; Castle, L.; Chaudhry, Q., Applications of Nanomaterials in Food Packaging
Bhushani, J. A.; Anandharamakrishnan, C., Electrospinning and Electrospraying Techniques:
Dutta, P. K.; Tripathi, S.; Mehrotra, G. K.; Dutta, J., Perspectives for Chitosan Based
Diez-Pascual, A. M.; Diez-Vicente, A. L., Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate)/Zno Bionanocomposites
Pittarate, C.; Yoovidhya, T.; Srichumpuang, W.; Intasanta, N.; Wongsasulak, S., Effects of
Amna, T.; Yang, J.; Ryu, K. S.; Hwang, I. H., Electrospun Antimicrobial Hybrid Mats:
Lin, X. H.; Fan, X. Y.; Li, R.; Li, Z. G.; Ren, T.; Ren, X. H.; Huang, T. S., Preparation and
Zhao, S. W.; Guo, C. R.; Hu, Y. Z.; Guo, Y. R.; Pan, Q. J., The Preparation and Antibacterial 19
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 20 of 37
378
Activity of Cellulose/Zno Composite: A Review. Open Chem. 2018, 16, 12.
379
(9) Sirelkhatim, A.; Mahmud, S.; Seeni, A.; Kaus, N. H. M.; Ann, L. C.; Bakhori, S. K. M.; Hasan,
380
H.; Mohamad, D., Review on Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles: Antibacterial Activity and Toxicity
381
Mechanism. Nano-Micro Lett. 2015, 7, 219-242.
382
(10) Li, Y.; Zhang, W.; Niu, J. F.; Chen, Y. S., Mechanism of Photogenerated Reactive Oxygen
383
Species and Correlation with the Antibacterial Properties of Engineered Metal-Oxide Nanoparticles.
384
ACS Nano 2012, 6, 5164-5173.
385
(11) Mayorga, J. L. C.; Rovira, M. J. F.; Mas, L. C.; Moragas, G. S.; Cabello, J. M. L.,
386
Antimicrobial
387
Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-Co-3-Hydroxyvalerate) and Copper Oxide Nanoparticles for Active
388
Packaging and Coating Applications. J. Appl. Polym Sci. 2018, 135, 11.
389
(12) Augustine, R.; Malik, H. N.; Singhal, D. K.; Mukherjee, A.; Malakar, D.; Kalarikkal, N.;
390
Thomas, S., Electrospun Polycaprolactone/Zno Nanocomposite Membranes as Biomaterials with
391
Antibacterial and Cell Adhesion Properties. J. Polym. Res. 2014, 21, 17.
392
(13) Dheraprasart, C.; Rengpipat, S.; Supaphol, P.; Tattiyakul, J., Morphology, Release
393
Characteristics, and Antimicrobial Effect of Nisin-Loaded Electrospun Gelatin Fiber Mat. J. Food
394
Prot. 2009, 72, 2293-2300.
395
(14) Padrao, J.; Machado, R.; Casal, M.; Lanceros-Mendez, S.; Rodrigues, L. R.; Dourado, F.;
396
Sencadas, V., Antibacterial Performance of Bovine Lactoferrin-Fish Gelatine Electrospun
397
Membranes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 81, 608-614.
398
(15) Liu, Y. Y.; Deng, L. L.; Zhang, C.; Feng, F. Q.; Zhang, H., Tunable Physical Properties of
399
Ethylcellulose/Gelatin Composite Nanofibers by Electrospinning. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66,
Nanocomposites
and
Electrospun
20
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Coatings
Based
on
Page 21 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
400
1907-1915.
401
(16) Li, M. C.; Mei, C. T.; Xu, X. W.; Lee, S.; Wu, Q. L., Cationic Surface Modification of
402
Cellulose Nanocrystals: Toward Tailoring Dispersion and Interface in Carboxymethyl Cellulose
403
Films. Polymer. 2016, 107, 200-210.
404
(17) Agarwal, D. C.; Chauhan, R. S.; Kumar, A.; Kabiraj, D.; Singh, F.; Khan, S. A.; Avasthi, D. K.;
405
Pivin, J. C.; Kumar, M.; Ghatak, J.; Satyam, P. V., Synthesis and Characterization of Zno Thin Film
406
Grown by Electron Beam Evaporation. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 99, 6.
407
(18) Xu, X. L.; Zhou, M. H., Antimicrobial Gelatin Nanofibers Containing Silver Nanoparticles.
408
Fiber. Polym. 2008, 9, 685-690.
409
(19) Najim, N. A., Comparative Study of Different Methods to Determine the Role of Reactive
410
Oxygen Species Induced by Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles. Aro 2015, 3, 30-34.
411
(20) Huang, S. W.; Zhou, L.; Li, M. C.; Wu, Q. L.; Kojima, Y.; Zhou, D. G., Preparation and
412
Properties of Electrospun Poly (Vinyl Pyrrolidone)/Cellulose Nanocrystal/Silver Nanoparticle
413
Composite Fibers. Mater. 2016, 9, 14.
414
(21) Matusiak, J.; Grzadka, E.; Bastrzyk, A., Stability, Adsorption and Electrokinetic Properties of
415
the Chitosan/Silica System. Colloid Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2018, 554, 245-252.
416
(22) Yu, J.; Kim, H. J.; Go, M. R.; Bae, S. H.; Choi, S. J., Zno Interactions with Biomatrices: Effect
417
of Particle Size on Zno-Protein Corona. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 14.
418
(23) Esfahani, H.; Prabhakaran, M. P.; Salahi, E.; Tayebifard, A.; Keyanpour-Rad, M.; Rahimipour,
419
M. R.; Ramakrishna, S., Protein Adsorption on Electrospun Zinc Doped Hydroxyapatite Containing
420
Nylon 6 Membrane: Kinetics and Isotherm. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 443, 143-152.
421
(24) Lu, H. Y.; Wang, Q. Q.; Li, G. H.; Qiu, Y. Y.; Wei, Q. F., Electrospun Water-Stable Zein/Ethyl 21
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
422
Cellulose Composite Nanofiber and Its Drug Release Properties. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2017, 74,
423
86-93.
424
(25) Kim, J.; Mousa, H. M.; Park, C. H.; Kim, C. S., Enhanced Corrosion Resistance and
425
Biocompatibility of Az31 Mg Alloy Using Pcl/Zno Nps Via Electrospinning. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017,
426
396, 249-258.
427
(26) Zhou, Z.; Liu, Y. G.; Liu, S. B.; Liu, H. Y.; Zeng, G. M.; Tan, X. F.; Yang, C. P.; Ding, Y.; Yan,
428
Z. L.; Cai, X. X., Sorption Performance and Mechanisms of Arsenic(V) Removal by Magnetic
429
Gelatin-Modified Biochar. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 314, 223-231.
430
(27) Ding, B.; Ogawa, T.; Kim, J.; Fujimoto, K.; Shiratori, S., Fabrication of a Super-Hydrophobic
431
Nanofibrous Zinc Oxide Film Surface by Electrospinning. Thin Solid Films 2008, 516, 2495-2501.
432
(28) Ghaedi, M.; Ansari, A.; Habibi, M. H.; Asghari, A. R., Removal of Malachite Green from
433
Aqueous Solution by Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle Loaded on Activated Carbon: Kinetics and Isotherm
434
Study. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014, 20, 17-28.
435
(29) Chitprasert, P.; Sutaphanit, P., Holy Basil (Ocimum Sanctum Linn.) Essential Oil Delivery to
436
Swine Gastrointestinal Tract Using Gelatin Microcapsules Coated with Aluminum Carboxymethyl
437
Cellulose and Beeswax. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 12641-12648.
438
(30) Lomakin, S. M.; Rogovina, S. Z.; Grachev, A. V.; Prut, E. V.; Alexanyan, C. V., Thermal
439
Degradation of Biodegradable Blends of Polyethylene with Cellulose and Ethylcellulose.
440
Thermochim. Acta 2011, 521, 66-73.
441
(31) Li, X. G.; Kresse, I.; Springer, J.; Nissen, J.; Yang, Y. L., Morphology and Gas Permselectivity
442
of Blend Membranes of Polyvinylpyridine with Ethylcellulose. Polymer. 2001, 42, 6859-6869.
443
(32) Muyonga, J. H.; Cole, C. G. B.; Duodu, K. G., Fourier Transform Infrared (Ftir) 22
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 22 of 37
Page 23 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
444
Spectroscopic Study of Acid Soluble Collagen and Gelatin from Skins and Bones of Young and
445
Adult Nile Perch (Lates Niloticus). Food Chem. 2004, 86, 325-332.
446
(33) Anitha, S.; Brabu, B.; Thiruvadigal, D. J.; Gopalakrishnan, C.; Natarajan, T. S., Optical,
447
Bactericidal and Water Repellent Properties of Electrospun Nano-Composite Membranes of
448
Cellulose Acetate and Zno. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 1065-1072.
449
(34) Natu, M. V.; de Sousa, H. C.; Gil, M. H., Effects of Drug Solubility, State and Loading on
450
Controlled Release in Bicomponent Electrospun Fibers. Int. J. Pharm. 2010, 397, 50-58.
451
(35) Soradech, S.; Nunthanid, J.; Limmatvapirat, S.; Luangtanaanan, M., An Approach for the
452
Enhancement of the Mechanical Properties and Film Coating Efficiency of Shellac by the
453
Formation of Composite Films Based on Shellac and Gelatin. J. Food Eng. 2012, 108, 94-102.
454
(36) Gomes, S.; Rodrigues, G.; Martins, G.; Henriques, C.; Silva, J. C., Evaluation of Nanofibrous
455
Scaffolds Obtained from Blends of Chitosan, Gelatin and Polycaprolactone for Skin Tissue
456
Engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 102, 1174-1185.
457
(37) Vatankhah, E.; Prabhakaran, M. P.; Jin, G.; Mobarakeh, L. G.; Ramakrishna, S., Development
458
of Nanofibrous Cellulose Acetate/Gelatin Skin Substitutes for Variety Wound Treatment
459
Applications. J. Biomater. Appl. 2014, 28, 909-921.
460
(38) Kanmani, P.; Rhim, J. W., Physicochemical Properties of Gelatin/Silver Nanoparticle
461
Antimicrobial Composite Films. Food Chem. 2014, 148, 162-169.
462 463
23
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
464
Figure captions
465
Figure 1 SEM images (A-D) of the ethylcellulose/gelatin fibers with ZnO levels of 0 wt%, 1 wt%,
466
1.5 wt%, and 2 wt% (denoted as Z0-EG, Z1-EG, Z1.5-EG, and Z2-EG, respectively), and EDX
467
analysis (E, G, I) and Zn mapping (F, H, J) of the Z0-EG, Z1-EG and Z2-EG fibers.
468 469
Figure 2 XPS spectra of wide scan (A), high resolution of Zn scan (B) and C1s scan (C-F) of the
470
ethylcellulose/gelatin fibers with ZnO levels of 0 wt%, 1 wt%, 1.5 wt%, and 2 wt% (denoted as
471
Z0-EG, Z1-EG, Z1.5-EG, and Z2-EG, respectively).
472 473
Figure 3 XRD patterns of ZnO nanoparticles and the ethylcellulose/gelatin fibers with ZnO levels
474
of 0 wt%, 1 wt%, 1.5 wt%, and 2 wt% (denoted as Z0-EG, Z1-EG, Z1.5-EG, and Z2-EG,
475
respectively).
476 477
Figure 4 FTIR spectra of the ethylcellulose/gelatin fibers with ZnO levels of 0 wt%, 1 wt%, 1.5
478
wt%, and 2 wt% (denoted as Z0-EG, Z1-EG, Z1.5-EG, and Z2-EG, respectively).
479 480
Figure 5 Water contact angles recorded at 1 s, 5 s and 15 s of the ethylcellulose/gelatin fibers with
481
ZnO levels of 0 wt%, 1 wt%, 1.5 wt%, and 2 wt% (denoted as Z0-EG, Z1-EG, Z1.5-EG, and Z2-EG,
482
respectively).
483 484
Figure 6 Growth curves (A), inhibition efficiency (B) of E. coli and S. aureus, and DCFH
485
fluorescence intensities in E. coli (C) exposed to the ethylcellulose/gelatin fibers containing 1.5 wt% 24
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 24 of 37
Page 25 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
486
ZnO with and without UV light (denoted as UV Z1.5-EG and dark Z1.5-EG, respectively).
487
Lowercases indicated statistical significance (p < 0.05).
488
25
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
489
Figure 1
26
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 26 of 37
Page 27 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 2
490
27
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 3
491
28
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 28 of 37
Page 29 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 4
492
29
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 5
493
30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 30 of 37
Page 31 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 6 (A)
(B)
494 495
(C)
496 497 498
31
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 32 of 37
499
Tables
500
Table 1. The apparent viscosities and zeta potential values of the ethylcellulose/gelatin solutions
501
with ZnO levels of 0 wt%, 1 wt%, 1.5 wt%, and 2 wt% (denoted as Z0-EG, Z1-EG, Z1.5-EG, and
502
Z2-EG, respectively), and zeta potentials of the ZnO solutions at levels of 0 wt%, 1 wt%, 1.5 wt%,
503
and 2 wt% (denoted as Z0, Z1, Z1.5, and Z2, respectively).
504
Type
Apparent viscosity (Pa·s)
Zeta potential (mV)
Type
Zeta potential (mV)
Z0-EG
2.05 ± 0.06 a a
1.47 ± 0.21 a
Z0
3.89 ± 0.64 c
Z1-EG
1.77 ± 0.07 a
1.08 ± 0.16 ab
Z1
6.98 ± 0.37 a
Z1.5-EG
1.30 ± 0.12 b
0.87 ± 0.10 b
Z1.5
5.73 ± 0.26 b
Z2-EG
1.78 ± 0.03 a
1.00 ± 0.12 ab
Z2
3.94 ± 0.25 c
a
Lowercases indicated statistical significance (p < 0.05).
505
32
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 33 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
506
Table 2. Atomic concentration percentages of C, O, N and ZnO examined by XPS of the
507
ethylcellulose/gelatin fibers with ZnO levels of 0 wt%, 1 wt%, 1.5 wt%, and 2 wt% (denoted as
508
Z0-EG, Z1-EG, Z1.5-EG, and Z2-EG, respectively). Surface element composition Type
509 510
a
Zn (Theoretical) (%)
Zn ratio (%)a
C (%)
O (%)
N (%)
Zn (%)
Z0-EG
65.7
27.0
7.3
-
0
0
Z1-EG
66.9
25.2
6.9
1.0
2.1
47.6
Z1.5-EG
65.8
27.0
5.8
1.5
3.2
46.9
Z2-EG
66.5
25.2
5.2
3.0
4.2
71.4
Zn ratio = Zn (surface)/Zn (Theoretical)×100%.
33
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 34 of 37
511
Table 3. The 2θ value, FWHM value and crystal area of the ethylcellulose/gelatin fibers with ZnO
512
levels of 0 wt%, 1 wt%, 1.5 wt%, and 2 wt% (denoted as Z0-EG, Z1-EG, Z1.5-EG, and Z2-EG,
513
respectively). Type
2θ (°)
Area
FWHM (β) (°)a
d (Å)b
Z0-EG
19.08
1376.46
6.32
0.222
Z1-EG
19.94
411.73
4.87
0.289
Z1.5-EG
20.04
538.50
4.82
0.292
Z2-EG
20.09
251.00
4.19
0.336
514
a
FWHM is the angular peak width at half maximum.
515
b
d = 0.9λ/(β cos(θ)), where λ is X-ray wavelength (1.541).
516
34
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 35 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
517
Table 4. The tensile parameters of the ethylcellulose/gelatin fibers with ZnO levels of 0 wt%, 1 wt%,
518
1.5 wt%, and 2 wt% (denoted as Z0-EG, Z1-EG, Z1.5-EG, and Z2-EG, respectively).
519
Type
Elastic modulus (E, MPa)
Tensile strength (σy, MPa)
Elongation at break (εb, %)
Z0-EG
148.10 ± 14.33 a a
1.70 ± 0.16 b
1.30 ± 0.11 ab
Z1-EG
188.77 ± 32.67 a
2.39 ± 0.17 a
1.39 ± 0.22 ab
Z1.5-EG
203.24 ± 43.06 a
2.42 ± 0.24 a
1.57 ± 0.31 a
Z2-EG
134.28 ± 45.17 a
1.65 ± 0.18 b
0.98 ± 0.17 b
a
Lowercases indicated statistical significance (p < 0.05).
520 521
35
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 36 of 37
522
Table 5. The surface swelling, water uptake and weight loss of the ethylcellulose/gelatin fibers with
523
ZnO levels of 0 wt%, 1 wt%, 1.5 wt%, and 2 wt% (denoted as Z0-EG, Z1-EG, Z1.5-EG, and Z2-EG,
524
respectively) after immersed in water for 24 h.
525
a
Type
Surface swelling (SW, %)
Water uptake (WT, %)
Weight loss (WL, %)
Z0-EG
-13.98 ± 0.63 a a
536.41 ± 21.46 a
13.78 ± 0.67 a
Z1-EG
-13.22 ± 0.33 a
297.90 ± 23.19 b
12.44 ± 0.97 ab
Z1.5-EG
-12.55 ± 0.13 b
209.31 ± 14.38 c
9.64 ± 0.86 b
Z2-EG
-12.08 ± 0.43 b
203.61 ± 20.71 c
9.33 ± 0.97 b
Lowercases indicated statistical significance (p < 0.05).
526
36
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 37 of 37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
527
Table 6. The inhibition zone of the ethylcellulose/gelatin fibers with ZnO levels of 0 wt%, 1 wt%,
528
1.5 wt%, and 2 wt% (denoted as Z0-EG, Z1-EG, Z1.5-EG, and Z2-EG, respectively).
529
a
Type
E. coli (mm/mg)
S. aureus (mm/mg)
Z0-EG
0 ± 0 da
0±0d
Z1-EG
0.69 ± 0.03 c
0.75 ± 0.020 c
Z1.5-EG
1.30 ± 0.04 b
1.17 ± 0.04 b
Z2-EG
1.61 ± 0.05 a
1.33 ± 0.06 a
Lowercases indicated statistical significance (p < 0.05).
37
ACS Paragon Plus Environment