Glyphosate Resistance Technology Has Minimal or No Effect on

Sep 11, 2018 - E-mail: [email protected]. ... Field studies were conducted in 2013 and 2014 in Stoneville, MS ... Enhancement of the Productio...
0 downloads 0 Views 424KB Size
Subscriber access provided by - Access paid by the | UCSB Libraries

Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry

Glyphosate Resistance Technology Has Minimal or No Effect on Maize Mineral Content and Yield Krishna N Reddy, James V. Cizdziel, Martin Williams, Jude Maul, Agnes M. Rimando, and Stephen O. Duke J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01655 • Publication Date (Web): 11 Sep 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on September 14, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 30

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Reddy et al. - 1

1

Glyphosate Resistance Technology Has Minimal or No Effect on Maize

2

Mineral Content and Yield

3

Krishna N. Reddy,1 James V. Cizdziel,2 Martin M. Williams, II,3 Jude E. Maul,4 Agnes M.

4

Rimando5 and Stephen O. Duke,*5

5 6

1

7

38776, United States

8

2

9

University, Mississippi 38677, United States

Crop Production Systems Research Unit, USDA-ARS, P.O. Box 350, Stoneville, Mississippi

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Mississippi, 222 Coulter Hall,

10

3

11

Illinois 61801, United States

12

4

13

Maryland 20705, United States

14

5

15

Mississippi 38677, United States

Global Change and Photosynthesis Research unit, USDA-ARS, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana,

Sustainable Agricultural Systems Laboratory, USDA-ARS, 10300 Baltimore Ave., Beltsville,

Natural Products Utilization Research Unit, USDA-ARS, P.O. Box 1848, University,

16

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 2 of 30

Reddy et al. - 2 17

ABSTRACT

18

Controversy continues to exist regarding whether the transgene for glyphosate resistance (GR)

19

and/or glyphosate applied to GR crops adversely affect plant mineral content. Field studies were

20

conducted in 2013 and 2014 in Stoneville, MS and Urbana, IL to examine this issue. At each

21

location, the experiment was conducted in fields with no history of glyphosate application and

22

fields with several years of glyphosate use preceding the study. Neither glyphosate nor the GR

23

transgene affected yield or mineral content of leaves or seed, except for occasional (< 5%)

24

significant effects that were inconsistent across minerals, treatments, and environments.

25

Glyphosate and AMPA (aminomethylphosphonic acid), a main degradation product of

26

glyphosate, were found in leaves from treated plants, but little or no glyphosate and no AMPA

27

was found in maize seeds. These results show that the GR transgene and glyphosate application,

28

whether used for a single year or several years, have no deleterious effect on mineral nutrition or

29

yield of GR maize.

30 31

KEYWORDS: aminomethylphosphonic acid, glyphosate, glyphosate resistance, mineral content,

32

transgenic crop, Zea mays

33

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 30

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Reddy et al. - 3 34

 INTRODUCTION

35

Worldwide, glyphosate (N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine) is used more than any other herbicide,1

36

due in large part to the widespread adoption of transgenic, glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops.1-3

37

GR crops include alfalfa, canola, cotton, maize, soybean, and sugarbeet, with maize and

38

soybean accounting for most GR hectares. All GR crops are made resistant to glyphosate by a

39

transgene encoding a GR form of 5-enolpyruvylshikimic acid-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS),

40

the enzyme target of glyphosate. In the majority of cases, the transgene encodes a resistant

41

EPSPS from the soil microbe Agrobacterium sp. (cp4 epsps). One exception is that some

42

maize cultivars contain the modified maize GR GA21 EPSPS.4 GR crops are about 50-fold

43

more resistant to glyphosate than non-transgenic crops.5

44

Some researchers have claimed glyphosate causes mineral deficiencies in GR crops that can

45

lead to increased plant disease, impaired physiology, and reduced yield.6-17 Others have not

46

found negative effects of glyphosate on mineral content, plant disease, or yield of GR crops.18-28

47

In a recent literature review,29 the authors concluded glyphosate does not adversely affect

48

mineral nutrition, disease, or yield of GR crops. Since then, additional studies have found no

49

adverse effects of glyphosate on GR crops.30-32 In one of these papers, the effects of glyphosate

50

on mineral content of GR soybean was examined over three years in five US states and one

51

Canadian province.31 There were no effects of glyphosate treatment on Mn content at any site in

52

any year. Potential effects of glyphosate on Mn content have been the focus of several papers

53

claiming adverse effects on mineral nutrition of GR crops.e.g.,8,10,17 A few inconsistent effects on

54

Fe, P and Zn occurred in this study.31 For example, the only significant effect on Zn content was

55

higher levels in glyphosate treatments than in treatments with other herbicides in Ontario in one

56

year of the study.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 4 of 30

Reddy et al. - 4 57

Previous studies were mostly on GR soybean. The GR trait is equally important in maize;2,3

58

however, there are only two studies of glyphosate effects on mineral content of GR maize, and

59

they were both limited in scope (one year and one research site).33, 34 More definitive studies of

60

possible effects of glyphosate on mineral nutrition in GR maize are needed. In this paper, we

61

investigate whether the GR transgene or glyphosate adversely affects plant mineral nutrition and

62

yield of maize. The study was conducted over two growing seasons at two geographically

63

distinct regions in fields both with and without a history of continuous glyphosate use. Our

64

results provide further evidence for the null hypothesis that GR crop technology, whether used

65

over one or several years, has no significant effect on mineral nutrition or yield of maize.

66

67

68 69

 MATERIALS AND METHODS Field Experiments. Field trials were conducted in the Southern and Midwestern U.S. maize production regions

70

over two years. Maize grown for grain was investigated in the Southern region at Stoneville,

71

MS. Maize grown for sweet corn was investigated in the Midwestern region at Urbana, IL. At

72

each location, trials were conducted in two field types: 1) fields with a history of glyphosate use

73

(hereafter called ‘glyphosate history’ fields), and 2) fields with no recent history of glyphosate

74

use (hereafter called ‘no-history’ fields).

75

Stoneville. Field experiments were conducted in 2013 and 2014 at the USDA-ARS Crop

76

Production Systems Research farm, Stoneville, Mississippi, USA. The glyphosate history field

77

had grown either GR soybean or GR cotton the previous 15 years. The no-history field had

78

cogongrass [Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv.] grown without herbicides the previous 12 years.

79

In 2012, cogongrass was killed with repeated tillage, and then non-GR soybean and non-GR

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 30

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Reddy et al. - 5 80

maize were planted in alternate rows to prepare the land. Maize and soybean were grown until

81

maturity and flail mowed. Fields were prepared by disking and bedding in the fall of 2012 and

82

2013. The soil in both fields was a Dundee silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, active, thermic Typic

83

Endoqualf) with pH 6.7, 1.1% organic carbon, and a cation exchange capacity of 15 meq 100

84

g−1. At planting, soil samples from the top 15-cm depth were collected by taking four random

85

cores (7.5-cm diameter) from all plots. Soil samples were analyzed for mineral content as

86

before.32

87

The treatments were a non-GR cultivar without glyphosate, a GR cultivar without

88

glyphosate, and a GR cultivar with glyphosate (application details below). The experimental

89

design was a randomized complete block with four replications. Each plot consisted of four

90

rows spaced 102 cm apart and 15.2 m long. Maize isogenic cultivars, DKC65-17 RR2 (GR,

91

containing the cp4 epsps transgene) and DKC65-18 (non-GR) were planted at 70,000 plants/ha

92

on April 8, 2013 and April 2, 2014 and grown using standard production practices under

93

irrigation. Herbicides, (pendimethalin and S-metolachlor), plus hand weeding were used to keep

94

the experimental area weed-free during the experiment.

95

A commercial formulation of potassium salt of glyphosate (Roundup WeatherMAX,

96

Monsanto Agricultural Co., St. Louis, MO) was used in the treatments. Consistent with label

97

recommendations, the first glyphosate application (0.87 kg ae/ha) was applied over the top and

98

the second application (0.87 kg ae/ha) was applied as post directed to the base of the maize

99

plants. Glyphosate was applied with a tractor-mounted sprayer with TeeJet 8004 standard flat

100

fan nozzles (TeeJet Spraying Systems Co., Wheaton, IL) delivering 187 L/ha spray volume at

101

179 kPa.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 6 of 30

Reddy et al. - 6 102

At R2 (blister stage, the silks are beginning to dry and darken to a brownish color) maize

103

growth stage (~ 4 weeks after second glyphosate application and 11 weeks after planting), 40

104

flag (uppermost) leaves were sampled randomly from the middle two rows of each plot. At

105

physiological maturity, 20 ears were sampled randomly from the middle two rows, and seed

106

were collected from all the ears for chemical analysis. Grain from all four rows of each plot was

107

harvested using a combine, and grain yield was adjusted to 15% moisture. Leaf and seed

108

samples were stored in sealed plastic bags at 4°C and room temperature, respectively.

109

Urbana. Similar field experiments were conducted in 2013 and 2014 at two fields at the

110

University of Illinois Crop Sciences Research and Education Center near Urbana, IL, USA. A

111

GR soybean crop had been grown regularly on the glyphosate history field the previous 15-years,

112

while the no-history field had been used as a perennial grass pasture for decades. Soil samples

113

were analyzed by the Agricultural Analytical Services Laboratory, Pennsylvania State

114

University. P, K, Mg, and Ca are Mehlich 3 extractable, and all other metals are total sorbed

115

metals by the EPA 3050 method. The Urbana location differed from Stoneville in terms of

116

isogenic maize cultivars (glyphosate-sensitive sweet corn ‘Passion’ and GR sweet corn ‘Passion

117

II’), glyphosate rate (a single application of 1.68 kg ae/ha glyphosate applied at the V4-5 growth

118

stage), and timing of yield measurements (R3 growth stage). Additional details are published in

119

the plant pathology results from this same study which addressed the influence of glyphosate and

120

the GR transgene on Goss’s wilt incidence and yield in maize.35

121

Mineral Analyses

122

Sample Preparation. Leaves were dried at 60 ℃ for 24 h to constant weight prior to digestion.

123

Seeds were digested without drying. Samples of each treatment were triplicated. Samples were

124

digested and prepared for analysis as before.12, 32

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 30

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Reddy et al. - 7 125

ICP-MS Analysis. The tissue concentrations of 26 minerals (Al, As, Ba, Be, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr,

126

Cs, Cu, Fe, Ga, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Pb, Rb, Se, Sr, Tl, U, V, Zn) were determined by sector

127

field inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (SF-ICPMS) using a Thermo Fisher

128

Element-XR as before.32 Instrumental and data acquisition parameters are provided in Table S1.

129

Leaf sample data are provided on a dry-weight basis and seed data are on a wet-weight (fresh)

130

basis. Reference material (NIST SRM 1547, Peach Leaves) recoveries generally ranged from

131

80-120%. Standard deviations between samples of the same treatment were generally less than

132

10%.

133

Analysis of glyphosate and AMPA

134

Samples were prepared as before.36 GC-MS analyses were performed as before36 with

135

modifications.32

136

Statistical Analyses. Since different types of maize were grown at Stoneville and Urbana, crop

137

responses were analyzed separately by location. Within each location, glyphosate history and

138

no-history fields were each represented once due to the difficulty of identifying fields without a

139

recent history of glyphosate use. Therefore, data from glyphosate history and no-history fields

140

were analyzed separately.

141

Response variables were individually analyzed by ANOVA using the Proc Mixed procedure

142

of SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina). Years and replicates were considered

143

random effects. The three treatments (i.e. non-GR cultivar without glyphosate, GR cultivar

144

without glyphosate, and GR cultivar with glyphosate) were considered fixed effects. In a few

145

instances, some minerals could not be quantified in one of the two years. In such cases, year was

146

removed as a random effect in the mixed model. For all data, when the treatment effect was

147

considered significant (P < 0.05), treatment means were compared using the Bonferroni-

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 8 of 30

Reddy et al. - 8 148

corrected multiple comparisons procedure. Yield data were subjected to analysis of variance

149

using SAS PROC GLM and treatment means were separated at the 5% level of significance

150

using Fisher’s least significant difference test.

151 152

 RESULTS

153

At planting, there were no differences in soil samples for pH, cation exchange capacity, organic

154

matter, or content of 20 minerals among plots assigned to the three treatments at the Mississippi

155

location (Table S2). There were no differences in soil composition between glyphosate history

156

and no-history fields (Table S2). Soil mineral analyses at the Illinois location were similar

157

(Table S3), one exception being lower Mn in soil of the no-history fields that were to be treated

158

with glyphosate.

159

Mineral content of leaves and seed.

160

Stoneville. There were few treatment differences in leaf mineral content 4 weeks after

161

glyphosate application, and none were consistent across both glyphosate history and no-history

162

fields. Neither the GR transgene nor glyphosate had an effect on leaf content of 24 of 26

163

minerals (Tables 1 and 2). In the glyphosate history field, leaf Mg and Mn content in the GR

164

with glyphosate treatment were significantly (10 and 20%, respectively) less than the non-GR,

165

no-glyphosate treatment (Table 1). However, leaf Mg and Mn content were unaffected by

166

treatments in the no-history field.

167

Similarly, few treatment differences in seed mineral content were observed and none

168

were consistent across both glyphosate history and no-history fields. The transgene and

169

glyphosate application had no effect on seed content of 21 of 26 minerals (Tables 3 and 4).

170

Significant treatment effects were observed for Cd seed content; however, the pattern of

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 30

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Reddy et al. - 9 171

treatment responses was inconsistent across fields, with increases above non-GR technology

172

plant levels with glyphosate treatment of GR plants in glyphosate history fields and decreases

173

below non-sprayed GR plants with glyphosate treatment of GR plants in no-history fields

174

(Table 3). Similarly, there were small treatment differences in Be, Li, Rb, and Tl seed content,

175

but these effects were inconsistent across fields (Table 4).

176

Across leaf and seed samples, when treatment differences were observed, glyphosate or

177

the GR transgene appeared to equally increase or decrease mineral content relative to the non-

178

GR, no-glyphosate treatment. In the instances where treatment differences were observed, the

179

range of differences was 10 to 20%.

180

Urbana. With one exception, there were no effects of glyphosate or the transgene on leaf

181

mineral content 5 weeks after glyphosate was applied (Table 5). Glyphosate application to GR

182

sweet corn in the no-history field reduced leaf Mg content 17% compared to the non-GR no-

183

glyphosate treatment. This effect was not observed in the glyphosate history field.

184

Neither glyphosate nor the GR transgene affected content of the 26 minerals measured

185

in sweet corn seed (Tables 6 and 7).

186

Glyphosate and AMPA content of leaves and seed.

187

Stoneville. Both glyphosate and AMPA were found in leaves of plants that were treated with

188

glyphosate (Figure 1). Neither glyphosate nor AMPA were found in leaves or seed of plants

189

not treated with glyphosate. The levels of AMPA were much lower than those of glyphosate.

190

Both glyphosate and AMPA levels were similar in both years with the same treatments, but

191

measured amounts were higher in glyphosate history field than the no-history field both years,

192

although statistical design did not allow a rigorous comparison. Neither glyphosate nor AMPA

193

was detected in maize seed in either year.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 10 of 30

Reddy et al. - 10 194

Urbana. Glyphosate levels were approximately one order of magnitude lower in the leaves of

195

glyphosate-treated plants in Urbana than in Stoneville (Figure 1). No AMPA was detected in

196

these samples. As with the Stoneville experiment, in 2013 neither glyphosate nor AMPA was

197

detected in seed of treated plants. In 2014, there were 24.9 ± 4.4 and 40.9 ± 2.4 ng g-1

198

glyphosate in the seed from the no glyphosate history and glyphosate history fields,

199

respectively.

200

Yield

201

Stoneville yields were unaffected by the transgene or glyphosate (Figure 2). Sweet corn yield

202

results of the experiment in Urbana, IL (data provided in Williams et al.35) were similar, in that

203

glyphosate use in GR maize did not reduce yield, but was associated with a significant yield

204

increase (8.3%) that was not related to weed control.35

205 206

 DISCUSSION

207

As with soybean,18, 32 few significant effects of GR technology on mineral content in maize

208

leaves or harvested seed were observed. The small number of significant differences appeared

209

random, because they represented less