News
GOVERNMENT
NELAC finishes first phase Thefinalset of standards proposed by the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NELAC) was approved by delegates at the third annual meeting, held in July, in Dallas. With the passage of the standards, NELAC moves into its implementation stage. NELAC was created to unify the standards and procedures used for accreditation of U.S. commercial and government environmental testing labs. The idea behind NELAC is that with a consistent set of standards, consistent results can be obtained with which important decisions regarding public health and environmental management can be made. The program was established in February 1995, after five years of planning. {Anall Chem. 1995,67,706 A 1996,68,83 A and 1996, 68, 527 A)) The standards passed with little controversy. However, concerns were raised on the last day of the meeting regarding the details of personnel qualifications. According to NELAC executive director Jeanne Mourrain, "Just the general description of personnel qualifications was retained, and the rest of it was removed." The issue is expected to be discussed further at the next interim meeting Issues that had previResults of the infornisi ously been raised by EPA regarding the proficiencv testing solved at the luly meeting For U.S. environmental laboratory data to be accepted worldwide, U.S. standards must mesh with international ones. "NEIAC is based on ISO 25 guidellnes," assures Mourrain. The details necessary to ensure uniformity with the international standards have been added, said Mourrain. Laboratories operating under Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) have already established international acceptance of their standards. There has been concern that placing the GLP program under the umbrella of NELAC could jeopardize international acceptance. According to Mourrain 588 A
"Right now we have decoupled the GLP program from the NELAC timeline." Adoption of the standards set by the national program is voluntary; therefore, U.S. states and territories have the option of participating in NEIAC. Not all U.S. states are expected to join. An informal survey was conducted just before the July meeting to determine which states were interested in having NELAC recognize their laboratory certification programs as accrediting authorities. Of a total of 56 responses, 40 programs said they intend on applying for recognition by NELAC. The application process is expected to begin this month, and the first of a series of stepwise approvals is expected by June 1 1998. States choosing to accept the NELAC standards will benefit from reciprocity among the other states that join, says Mourrain. If all goes as planned, accreditation by one state that is recognized by NELAC as an accrediting authority will ensure accreditation in all states that are recognized. This policy will be particularly beneficial for environmental testing labs that operate in multiple states, which traditionally required multiple accreditations at great costs to the laboratories. In addi-
NELAC survey.
tion to reducing costs, the acceptance of NELAC is expected to help eliminate redundant and conflicting accreditation requirements for laboratories operating in more than one state. Britt Erickson
A forum for analytical hope Analytical science in the U.K. has been forced to regroup to cope with the growing pressure on its services. Companies are restructuring, and public and academic sectors face increasing demands from dwindling funds, new international
Analytical Chemistry News & Features, October 1, 1997
standards, and European law (regarding such matters as water impurities, pesticide residues, and pollution levels), as well as closer scrutiny in the courts. As a result, the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) and other interested bodies initiated an Analytical Science Forum (ASF) to improve strategy, strengthen analytical science, and discuss issues. The RSC says that greater interactton among concerned organizations with a vested interest in analysis is necessary. Thii conclusion was reinforced by Foresight, ,he UK government's effort to capitalize on science, which recognized analytical science as important but in need of repair. The ASF's main aim is simply to promote better contact among organizations involved in analysis—whether working in chemistry, physics, mathematics, electronics, computing, instrumentation, or communications—explains Bryan Pierce, immediate past-president of the RSC's Analytical Division. Improved communication, he hopes, will allow member organizations to coordinate mutually beneficial activities. In addition, the ASF will attempt to identify key areas for analytical science and wield influence with funding bodies such as the Research Councils and the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI). Questions concerning the science's image—demoralizingly low in routine areas but glamorous in forensics, for instance— and how to attract new students into the field will also be faced. ASF Secretary Paula Whelan says some 23 organizations are involved thus far, but "membership of the Forum is still evolving." Membership is open to any organization interested in analytical science. Pierce's hopes of the ASF improving the outlook for analytical science are not without foundation. Members already have diverse interests and include the RSC, the Institute of Physics, the Association of British Spectroscopists, the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, the Chromatographic Society, the Association of Public Analysts the Forensic Science Society and the Chemical Industries Association. The DTI will act observer while strong links will be retained with Foresight through its Chemicals Panel The ASF has established a steering group, which will meet this month to decide priorities for action. One topic open for discussion will be how well analytical scientists in other countries are coping with the pressures on the field. Pierce does not want to raise expectations too high—analytical science has
been in decline for a number of years, he says. The ASF recognizes the problem but might need as much as five to ten years to reverse the trend. David Bradley
BUSINESS
PE acquires PerSeptive Biosystems Perkin-Elmer announced in August that it will acquire Massachusetts-based PerSeptive Biosystems. The merger was expected to involve the exchange of approximately $360 million in PE stock for PerSeptive securities. PerSeptive manufactures instrumentation, such as MALDI-TOF, as well as supplies for the life sciences market. The company has been growing quickly. In fiscal 1991, the company recorded sales of close to $1 million, which ballooned to $75 million by fiscal 1996. The company's workforce has grown to 550 worldwide. According to Tony White, Perkin-Elmer's president and chief executive officer, the merger is "the culmination of an intensive strategic review that led us to identify PerSeptive as an ideal partner." Noubar Afeyan head of PerSeptive, said that the combination would provide his company with the "capital resources to secure our mission of being the leader in protein characterization in drug discovery"
ASTM sets up Andi subcommittee The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) approved in July the formation of a new subcommittee (E49.08) to develop analytical data interchange (Andi) protocols that could lead to the standardization of software in analytical instruments. The subcommittee is headed by Bob Emerson of Hewlett Packard. Task groups on chromatography, headed by Greg Murphy of Waters, and MS, headed by Mark Canales of Finnigan, were also established. Initially, the subcommittee will convert Andi protocols developed by the Analytical Instrument Association into ASTM standards, but the group anticipates developing standards in other The subcommittee will also ft Vf r e p p
voluntary annual round robin testing of the protocols and future modifications of the standards
THERMAL ANALYSIS IN POLYMER CHARACTERIZATION T H E RENOWNED FACULTY: EDITH A. TURI, COURSE DIRECTOR, RESEARCH PROFESSOR, POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY HARVEY E. BAIR, TECHNICAL STAFF, LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES
SHIRO MATSUOKA, RESEARCH PROFESSOR, POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY Monday-Tuesday, October 20-21, 1997 Washington, DC
Ten Key Ways You Will Benefit Attending This Course: Learn the basic principles of thermal techniques Understand the characteristics of commercial instruments: learn their applicability to your needs © Learn the systematic application of thermal analysis to a broad range of polymers 0
Learn ways to enhance polymer performance
H/ Learn how to optimize experimental conditions and interpret thermal data obtained by different techniques
from
Kw Learn how to increase your direct input in achieving marketing objectives © Eliminate expensive trialand-error experiments by cost-efficient, speedy, smallscale thermal analysis Enhance your capability to conduct experiments targeted to improving quality and increasing productivity til' Discuss with leading experts your specific questions s u c h as problem solving, troubleshooting, and operation safety
is/ Optimize processes and quality control methods For more information on this highly-rated, new course, mall or fax the coupon below. FAX: (202) 872-6336. Or call the American Chemical Society Educational Services/Short Courses Office at (800) 227-5558 (TOLL FREE) or (202) 872-4508. XJib.
Please send me more information on the ACS Short Course, Thermal Analysis in Polymer Characterization, to be held October 20-21, 1997, in Washington, DC.
NAME TITLE ORGANIZATION ADDRESS CITY, STATE, ZIP FAX BUSINESS PHONE MAIL TO: American Chemical Society, Dept. of Continuing Education, Meeting Code TAPC9710, 1155 Sixteenth Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20036
Analytical Chemistry News & Features, October 1, 1997 589 A
