Halide Ion-mediated Synthesis of L10-FePt Nanoparticles with

16 mins ago - It is confirmed that the strong ionic binding force between halide ions and Fe3+ or Pt2+ ions could facilitate the formation of L10-FePt...
1 downloads 0 Views 896KB Size
Subscriber access provided by Kaohsiung Medical University

Communication

Halide Ion-mediated Synthesis of L10-FePt Nanoparticles with Tunable Magnetic Properties Wenjuan Lei, Junjie Xu, Weiwei Yang, Yongsheng Yu, Yanglong Hou, and Dafa Chen Nano Lett., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03603 • Publication Date (Web): 15 Nov 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on November 15, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Nano Letters

1

Halide Ion-mediated Synthesis of L10-FePt

2

Nanoparticles with Tunable Magnetic Properties

3

Wenjuan Lei,† Junjie Xu,‡ Yongsheng Yu,*,† Weiwei Yang,*,† Yanglong Hou*,‡ and

4

Dafa Chen†

5



6

Storage, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology,

7

Harbin, Heilongjiang 150001, China

8



9

Beijing Innovation Center for Engineering Science and Advanced Technology (BIC-

10

ESAT), Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering,

11

Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

12

ABSTRACT: L10-FePt nanoparticles (NPs) have great potential in areas of advanced

13

magnetic and catalytic applications. Here, we present a facile control route for synthesis

14

of hard magnetic L10-FePt NPs, in which halide ions (Cl-, Br- or I-) were added to the

15

synthetic process to promote the phase transfromaion. It is confirmed that the strong ionic

16

binding force between halide ions and Fe3+ or Pt2+ ions could facilitate the formation of

17

L10-FePt phase due to favoring growth of FePt NPs in a more thermodynamically stable

MIIT Key Laboratory of Critical Materials Technology for New Energy Conversion and

Beijing Key Laboratory for Magnetoeletric Materials and Devices (BKL-MEMD),

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Nano Letters 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

1

way, which enables the formation of an ordered structure. L10-FePt NPs with the highest

2

coercivity of 8.64 kOe and saturation magnetization of 64.21 emu/g at room temperature

3

can be directly obtained by controlling the amount of the halide ions. Comparing with

4

conventional solution phase reduction methods, the halide ions-assisted method shows

5

enhanced capability to tune the growth of hard magnetic bimetallic NPs, particularly Pt-

6

based bimetallic NPs.

7

KEYWORDS: L10-FePt, nanoparticle, hard magnetic, coercivity, halide ions

8 9

L10-ordered FePt nanoparticles (NPs) with face-centered-tetragonal (fct) phase

10

structure have aroused extensive attention for potential applications in ultra-high-

11

density magnetic recording media, magnetic energy storage and electrocatalysis

12

because of their large magneto-crystalline anisotropy constant (Ku > 107 erg/cm3),

13

high coercivity, outstanding corrosion resistance and eminent catalytic activity.1-5

14

Solution phase chemical synthesis of monodispersed FePt NPs with controllable

15

size, composition and regular shapes have been reported over the last few decades.6-

16

9

17

centered cubic structure (fcc), which is superparamagnetic at room temperature and

18

cannot be applied in areas of data storage and permanent magnetic materials.10-13

19

For obtaining hard magnetic L10-phase, high temperature (>550 oC) annealing of

In general, the as-synthesized FePt NPs from solution phase reactions have a face-

2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 22

Page 3 of 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Nano Letters

1

the as-made NPs under a reducing or inert atmosphere is required.14-17 However,

2

the protective organic layer surrounding the NPs will decompose at high

3

temperature condition, and resulting in particle agglomeration that will lead to the

4

growth up of particles with irregular shapes and sizes.18-21 Among various

5

preparation processes, a direct synthetic process that can produce fct phase FePt

6

NPs without post-synthesis annealing has attracted special interest.

7

In previous studies, a series of strategies have been reported for preparing fct-

8

FePt NPs. One strategy is to prepare the fcc-FePt NPs in a high temperature

9

solution route first. Next the fcc-FePt NPs are coated with high melting point

10

oxides such as SiO2, MgO or MnO to inhibit NPs growth and aggregation under

11

the high temperature annealing process. Then the coated oxide on the surface of

12

the NPs can be removed by acid pickling.

13

contribute to obtaining great dispersible fct-FePt NPs, the post annealing step is

14

still necessary. Another strategy is to decrease the ordered temperature of fct-FePt

15

phase by addition of other noble metals or transition metal atoms, Ag, Au, Cu, Zn

16

or Sb, for example.27-31 Wang et al. found that Ag additive can decrease the L10-

17

FePt phase ordered temperature in hexadecylamine.28 The ordering degree of L10-

18

FePt phase is sensitive to the amount of Ag. By increasing the Ag mole ratio to

19

29%, the coercivity of the NPs can reach 7.6 kOe. However, further increase of

22-26

Although the coated oxides can

3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Nano Letters 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

1

the Ag mole ratio leads to a decrease in the coercivity. Recent research shows that

2

moderate amount of Cu additives can also be effective in facilitating the ordering

3

degree of L10-FePt NPs.29 A coercivity of 4.8 kOe can be achieved for FePtCu

4

NPs due to the fact that Cu doping promotes grain growth and increases the driving

5

force for ordering of FePt NPs. In our previous studies, we prepared monodisperse

6

L10-FePtAu NPs by addition of Au precursors in the high temperature solution

7

phase process.30 When the Au mole ratio increases to 32%, the coercivity can

8

reach up to 12.15 kOe, which is far higher than other literature values concerning

9

the direct liquid phase synthesis of L10-FePt NPs. The results showed that Au or

10

Ag atoms alloy with FePt to form fcc-FePtAu at a lower temperature. With the

11

temperature increasing, Au or Ag atoms segregate from fcc-FePtM (M=Ag or Au)

12

lattice, leaving lots of vacancies for the Fe and Pt atoms to rearrange in an orderly

13

manner. Despite the recent progress in the synthesis of these materials (or NPs),

14

the use of noble metal atoms will increase the economic cost in addition to needing

15

an acid treatment process. Thus, it is still desirable, albeit challenging to directly

16

prepare L10-FePt NPs by a liquid phase synthesis process that does not require

17

further annealing or the addition of noble metal atoms additives.

18

Here, we present a new route to directly prepare L10-FePt NPs by liquid phase

19

synthesis in the presence of halide ions (Cl-, Br- and I-). Heating the mixture of 4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 22

Page 5 of 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Nano Letters

1

Fe(acac)3, Pt(acac)2 and oleylamine (OAm) to 350 oC in the presence of halide ions,

2

L10-FePt NPs with high room temperature coercivity can be directly obtained

3

without further annealing. The phase structure and magnetic property of the FePt

4

NPs can be tuned by the addition of different halide ions. The results demonstrated

5

that the halide ions played a key part in the formation of L10-FePt NPs. The strong

6

binding forces of halide ions to Fe3+ or Pt2+ ions retarded the FePt growth kinetics

7

and facilitated the Fe and Pt atoms to alloy in a more thermodynamically stable way

8

and form the L10-FePt ordered structure. These halide ions effects may be

9

generalized to tune the bimetallic NPs growth, especially Pt-based bimetallic NPs,

10

into desired crystal structures.

11

We took NH4Cl as an example to synthesize the FePt NPs. In a typical synthesis,

12

Fe(acac)3, Pt(acac)2, OAm and NH4Cl were mixed and stirred under nitrogen. The

13

mixture was heated at 100 oC for 0.5 h to remove air and moisture from the reaction

14

system. Then the mixture was heated to 350 °C for a different amount of time, and

15

cooled to room temperature. The resulting product was collected and washed with

16

a mixture of ethanol and hexane, finally redispersed in hexane. The typical low-

17

magnification TEM image of the NPs (Figure 1a) showed that the 3:1 mole ratio

18

of NH4Cl to Pt(acac)2 (Cl- to Pt2+), when heated at 350 oC for 3 h, yielded FePt NPs

19

with a diameter of ~70 nm. After ultrasonic dispersion for 3 h, the smaller FePt NPs 5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Nano Letters 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

1

could be seen (Figure S1), suggesting that each large FePt NP was composed of

2

small particles. High-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image revealed the NPs possessed

3

a poly-crystalline structure (Figure 1b). The fringe distances were 0.37 nm and

4

0.22 nm, which were in accord with the (001) and (111) planes of the fct FePt alloy

5

structure, respectively. And the electron diffraction rings corresponded to the (001)

6

and (110) planes (Figure 1c), further confirming the formation of the L10-FePt

7

phase in the as-synthesized NPs. The elemental distribution of L10-FePt NPs

8

showed that both Fe and Pt atoms distributed uniformly in the L10-FePt alloy

9

structure (Figure 1d-f).

10

6

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 22

Page 7 of 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Nano Letters

1

Figure 1. (a) The low- and (b) high-magnification TEM images of the fct-FePt NPs

2

synthesized at 350 oC for 3 h with a Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratio of 3:1. (c) SAED pattern of

3

the fct-FePt NPs. (d-f) Elemental mappings of Fe (green) (d), Pt (red) (e) and

4

combined signals (f) of the fct-FePt NPs.

5

To tune the crystal structure and magnetic properties of the FePt NPs, we studied the

6

effects of the reaction time on their formation. We have synthesized the FePt NPs with a

7

Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratio of 3:1 at 350 oC from 0.5 h to 9 h, respectively. The TEM images of

8

the NPs synthesized for a different amount of time showed that the NPs were nearly in the

9

same shape (Figure S2). The composition of the FePt NPs, however, varied with the

10

reaction time (Fiugre 2a). When the mixture was heated at 350 oC for 0.5 h, Fe43Pt57 NPs

11

were formed, suggesting that the reductive rate of the Fe atoms was slower than Pt atoms.

12

Because of the different reductive rates, Pt-riched NPs were firstly formed. By extending

13

the reaction time, the Fe precursors were further reduced to Fe atoms and diffused into the

14

Pt-riched NPs, which led to an increase in the amount of Fe in the NPs while the relative

15

the amount of Pt descreased. Finnally, Fe49.2Pt50.8 NPs were obtained after heating at 350

16

oC

for 9 h.

17

The phase structure of the reaction time-dependent NPs are shown in Figure 2b. The

18

appearance of (001) and (110) diffraction peaks for 1 h NPs confirms the formation of L10

19

ordered phase. The intensity of (001) and (110) peaks increased and the (200) and (220) 7

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Nano Letters 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

1

peaks split with the extension of reaction time, indicating an improvement in the ordering

2

degree of L10 phase. These results also show that the ordering degree of L10 phase

3

increases with the reaction time.

4 5

Figure 2. (a) Relationship between the reaction time and the Fe and Pt compositions in

6

the NPs for the Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratio of 3:1. The XRD patterns (b) and the room-temperature

7

hysteresis loops (c) of FePt NPs synthesized with a Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratio of 3:1 at 350 oC for

8

a different reaction time. (d) The low-temperature hysteresis loops of FePt NPs

9

synthesized with a Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratio of 3:1 at 350 oC for 9 h.

10

8

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 22

Page 9 of 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Nano Letters

1

Figure 2c shows the room-temperature magnetic properties of the NPs

2

synthesized with a Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratio of 3:1 at 350 oC for various reaction time.

3

When the reaction mixture was heated at 350 oC for 0.5 h, the NPs showed weak

4

hard magnetism with only 0.40 kOe coercivity and 19.5 emu/g saturation

5

magnetization. By increasing the reaction time, the hard magnetic property of FePt

6

NPs was enhanced. When the reaction time was 3 h, the coercivity of the NPs was

7

6.89 kOe and the saturation magnetization was 23.37 emu/g. Further extension of

8

the reaction time led to higher coercivity and saturation magnetization. By

9

increasing the reaction time to 6 h, the room temperature coercivity and saturation

10

magnetization of the NPs increased to 7.22 kOe and 44.86 emu/g, respectively. The

11

NPs synthesized at 9 h showed the highest coercivity of 8.64 kOe and saturation

12

magnetization of 64.21 emu/g at room temperature. Both coercivity and saturation

13

magnetization increased with the reaction time up to 9 h because of the increased

14

L10-FePt ordering and Fe composition. These results suggested that the magnetic

15

property of the fct-FePt NPs can be controlled by simply altering the reaction time.

16

The magnetic properties of the FePt NPs synthesized at 350 oC for 9 h with a Cl-

17

/Pt2+ mole ratio of 3:1 were also measured at lower temperatures such as 5 K, 100

18

K and 200 K (Figure 2d). The low-temperature hysteresis loops showed that the

19

FePt NPs were magnetically hard, with coercivity reaching 8.93 kOe (200 K), 9.84

20

kOe (100 K) and 11.01 kOe (5 K). 9

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Nano Letters 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

1 2

Figure 3. (a) Low- and (b) high-magnification HAADF-STEM images of

3

representative fct-FePt NPs synthesized at 350 oC for 9 h with a Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratio

4

of 3:1. (c) Corresponding HAADF line profiles across the line scan position in (b)

5

normalized with Z contrast of metal atoms.

6

To verify the FePt NPs ordering, we characterized the fct-FePt NPs synthesized at 350

7

oC

8

field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM). The typical HAADF-

9

STEM image of the L10-FePt NPs also showed that each FePt NPs was composed of small

10

NPs (Figure 3a). The intermetallic structure, represented by the periodic contrast change,

11

was clearly visible in the high-magnification HAADF-STEM image (Figure 3b). The

12

layered Fe/Pt structure in the fct-FePt NPs was obviously revealed by the high (Pt) and

13

low (Fe) Z contrasts, which were consistent with line profiles (Figure 3c) across the line

14

scans No 1 and 2 along the direction drawn in Figure 3b. The alternating intensity

15

profile of the line scan No 3 along the direction (Figure 3c) confirmed that the

16

L10-FePt NPs consisted of the layered Fe/Pt structure and the Fe/Pt atoms arranging

for 9 h with a Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratio of 3:1 by aberration-corrected high-angle annular dark

10

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 10 of 22

Page 11 of 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Nano Letters

1

alternatively in the order of FePt along the direction. These results fully confirm

2

the formation of ordered bimetallic fct-FePt NPs in the current synthesis.

3

In addition, the effects of a Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratio on the composition, morphology,

4

crystal structure and magnetic properties of the FePt NPs synthesized at 350 oC for

5

3 h were investigated. The compositions of the FePt NPs synthesized with a

6

different amount of Cl- were characterized by ICP-AES. Figure 4a shows that

7

without Cl-, the Fe/Pt atoms mole ratio of the as-prepared FePt NPs was 49:51. By

8

increasing the Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratio from 1:1 to 3:1, the Fe/Pt atoms ratio in the FePt

9

NPs changed from 47.4:52.6 to 47.1:52.9, suggesting that the Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratios

10

of lower than 3:1 had little influence on the FePt NPs composition. Further

11

increasing the Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratio to higher than 3:1, the composition of the as-

12

prepared FePt NPs was greatly affected. And the amount of Fe in the FePt NPs

13

started to decrease sharply while relative Pt amount increased. The as-prepared

14

FePt NPs compositions approached to be Fe40Pt60, Fe30Pt70 and Fe25Pt75 when the

15

Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratios increased to 4:1, 5:1 and 6:1, respectively. Therefore, it can be

16

concluded that excess Cl- could slow down the Fe3+ and Pt2+ reduction rate and

17

inhibit the formation of the FePt alloy with Fe and Pt atoms ratio of 1:1 in the OAm.

18

The crystal structure of the NPs synthesized at 350 oC for 3 h in the presence of

19

different amount of Cl- was characterized by XRD, as shown in Figure 4b. A strong 11

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Nano Letters 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

1

peak (37.2o ~44.4o) and a weak broad peak (44.4o ~50.5o) were observed in the

2

FePt NPs synthesized without Cl-, corresponding to (111) and (200) diffraction

3

peaks of fcc-FePt phase structure, respectively. When the Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratio was

4

1:1, weak (001) and (110) peaks certified the formation of L10-FePt NPs. The (001)

5

and (110) peaks relative intensity enhanced with the Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratio increasing

6

from 2:1 to 3:1. And more splitting of (200) and (002) peaks meant higher ordering

7

degree of L10-FePt NPs. The peaks of (001) and (110) relative intensity started to

8

decrease and the (111) peak split to two peaks, indicating the formation of L12-

9

FePt3 in the sample with a Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratio of 4:1. When the Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratio

10

increased to 6:1, no other diffraction peaks from L10-FePt phase could be observed

11

in the XRD pattern, finally only L12-FePt3 NPs were separated. These results

12

suggest that L10-FePt structure could be directly obtained by co-reduction of

13

Fe(acac)3 and Pt(acac)2 with OAm by simply controlling the amount of Cl-.

14

15 12

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 12 of 22

Page 13 of 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Nano Letters

1

Figure 4. (a) Relationship between the Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratio and the Fe and Pt

2

compositions in the NPs synthesized at 350 oC for 3 h. (b) The XRD patterns of

3

FePt NPs synthesized with a different Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratio synthesized at 350 oC for

4

3 h.

5

6

In order to further characterize the size and morphology of the Cl- amount-dependent

7

NPs, we also performed TEM measurements, as shown in Figure S3. It can be seen that

8

the amount of NH4Cl added in the synthesis controlled not only the crystal structure, but

9

also the size and morphology of the as-synthesized NPs. For the synthesis without NH4Cl,

10

polyhedral NPs with their size being at around 5 nm could be obtained, as shown in Figure

11

S3a. When the Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratio was lower than 3:1, the NPs with irregular shape could

12

be obtained (Figure S3b). The NPs with dendritic nanostructures were achieved by further

13

increasing the Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratio from 3:1 to 6:1, which were composed of a number of

14

densely packed branches (Figure S3c-f). Increasing the amount of Cl- in the synthesis

15

caused particle size enlargement and size distribution widening. The diameter of the L10-

16

FePt NPs increased from ∼39 to ∼90 nm with the Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratio changing from 2:1

17

to 6:1. The color of the reaction mixture slowly changed from brown to black at about 195

18

oC,

19

was tuned from 1:1 to 6:1, suggesting that the NH4Cl additive resulted in slower metal

20

ions reduction rate. In comparison, in the absence of NH4Cl, the color of the reaction

225 oC , 239 oC, 248 oC, 252 oC and 259 oC , respectively, when the Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratio

13

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Nano Letters 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

1

mixture changed from yellow to black at about 184 °C. These results indicated that the Cl-

2

retarded the nucleation rate of the NPs and enabled the NPs to grow to a larger size.

3

Room temperature magnetic properties of the NPs syntesized with a different Cl-/Pt2+

4

mole ratio are shown in Figure S4. Without the addition of NH4Cl in the synthesis, the

5

as-synthesized NPs showed superparamagnetic property at room temperature. When the

6

Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratio varied from 1:1 to 2:1, the coercivity of the NPs increased from 2.31

7

kOe to 2.84 kOe, suggesting that the FePt NPs contained hard magnetic fct phase. A room

8

temperature coercivity of 6.89 kOe was achieved when the Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratio reached 3:1.

9

Further increasing the Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratio to 4:1 resulted in a decrease in the coercivity.

10

When the Cl-/Pt2+ mole ratio was increased to 6:1, the NPs were paramagnetic at room

11

temperature, suggesting that only L12-FePt3 phase was obtained in the production. From

12

this series of magnetic measurement, we can also confirm that excess Cl- inhibit the fct-

13

FePt phase formation.

14

To investigate the determining factor for the fct-FePt phase formation, we

15

synthesized the NPs under the same condition other than replacing NH4Cl with

16

(NH4)2SO4 or the precursor of Fe(acac)3 with FeCl2·4H2O in the absence of NH4Cl.

17

When FeCl2·4H2O was used as precursors, 24.9 nm fct-FePt NPs with the

18

coercivity of 1.74 kOe were formed (Figure S5-S7). In the presence of (NH4)2SO4,

14

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 14 of 22

Page 15 of 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Nano Letters

1

only fcc-FePt NPs were obtained (Figure S8 and S9). These studies indicate that

2

Cl- has a strong effect on the fct-FePt growth.

3

We further tested the effects of other halide ions of Br- and I- on the growth of

4

FePt NPs. Thermally unstable compounds such as KBr and KI were used as halide

5

addition agent to replace the NH4Cl in the synthesis. When Br- and I- were

6

introduced into the reaction mixture, the product showed the (001) and (110) peaks

7

of fct-FePt phase in the corresponding XRD patterns (Figure S11). The as-

8

synthesized NPs also showed the ferromagnetic properties at room temperature

9

(Figure S12). With the addition of KBr and KI, the coercivity of the as-prepared

10

NPs can reach 1.68 kOe and 5.72 kOe, respectively. Our studies indicate that halide

11

ions (Cl-, Br- or I-) are the key controlling factor of the fct-FePt phase formation.

12

13 15

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Nano Letters 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

1

Figure 5. The schematic illustration of fct-FePt NPs formation in the presence of

2

Cl-.

3 4

On the basis of the results described above, it can be concluded that only fcc-

5

FePt NPs were formed due to the fast reduction reaction rate in the absence of halide

6

ions. An appropriate amount of halide ions (Cl-, Br- or I-) can efficiently retard the

7

fcc-FePt growth kinetics, facilitating the formation of ordered fct-FePt NPs.32-34

8

Increasing the amount of halide ions in the synthesis will slow down metal

9

precursors reduction rate, further decreasing the nucleation rate of the NPs and

10

resulting in the larger size NPs.35,36 As illustrated in Figure 5, we hypothesize that

11

strong binding forces of Fe-halide ions and Pt-halide ions slow down the growth of

12

Fe and Pt atoms on the surface of seeding NPs, then facilitate the NPs growth by a

13

thermodynamic more stable way to form fct phase.

14

In summary, a halide-ions (Cl-, Br- or I-) mediated strategy for synthesis of fct-

15

FePt NPs was developed. The FePt NPs structure can be controlled to be either fcc

16

(without halide ions) or poly-crystalline fct (with different amounts of halide ions)

17

through co-reduction of Fe(acac)3 and Pt(acac)2 in OAm. The systematic

18

investigation on the synthetic mechanism confirm that the key control factor to

19

form fct-FePt NPs is the strong binding force between halide ions and Fe or Pt ions,

20

which are crucial for favoring FePt NPs growing in a more thermodynamic stable 16

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 16 of 22

Page 17 of 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Nano Letters

1

way and forming more stable fct phase structure. L10-FePt NPs with a room-

2

temperature coercivity as high as 8.64 kOe and saturation magnetization of 64.21

3

emu/g can be directly obtained by controlling the amount of the halide ions. This

4

halide ion-assisted strategy may demonstrate a general route to tune the phase

5

structure, magnetic properties and morphology of the FePt NPs by addition of

6

different kinds of halide ions or in various amounts. The strategy also provides

7

opportunities to prepare other magnetically hard Pt-based bimetallic NPs in a more

8

controllable manner.

9

10

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

11

Supporting Information. The Supporting Information is available free of charge

12

on the ACS Publications website, and includes experiment section, TEM images,

13

XRD patterns and hysteresis loops (Figures S1-S12).

14

AUTHOR INFORMATION

15

Corresponding Author

16

* E-mail: [email protected]

17

* E-mail: [email protected]

18

* E-mail: [email protected] 17

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Nano Letters 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

1

ORCID

2

Yongsheng Yu:

3

Weiwei Yang:

4

Yanglong Hou:

5

Author Contributions

6

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have

7

given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

8

Notes

9

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

10

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

11

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under

12

Grant (No. 51571072, 51590882, 51631001), the National Key R&D Program of China

13

(2017YFA0206301), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.

14

AUGA5710012715), Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Scientific Research Development Fund

15

(No. LBH-Q14058), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2015M81436) and

16

Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. LBH-Z15065).

17

REFERENCES

18

(1)

Yue, M.; Zhang, X.; Liu, J. P. Nanoscale. 2017, 9 (11), 3674-3697. 18

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 18 of 22

Page 19 of 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Nano Letters

1 2

(2)

3090-3094.

3

(3)

4

190.

5

(4)

6 7 8

Yu, Y.; Mendozagarcia, A.; Ning, B.; Sun, S. H. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25 (22),

Zeng, H.; Li, J.; Wang, Z.; Liu J. P.; Sun, S. H. Nano. Lett. 2015, 4 (1), 187-

Yu, Y. S.; Sun, K.; Tian, Y.; Li, X. Z.; Kramer, M. J.; Sellmyer, D. J.; Shield

J. E.; Sun, S. H. Nano. Lett. 2013, 13 (10), 4975-4979. (5)

Zeng, H.; Li, J.; Liu, J. P.; Wang, Z. L.; Sun, S. H. Nature. 2002, 420 (6914),

395-398.

9

(6)

Min, C.; Liu, J. P.; Sun, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126 (27), 8394-8395.

10

(7)

Yu, Y. S.; Yang, W.; Sun, X. L.; Zhu, W. L.; Li, X. Z.; Sellmyer, D. J.; Sun,

11 12 13

S. H. Nano. Lett. 2014, 14 (5), 2778-2782. (8)

(39), 15354-15357.

14

(9)

15

2882.

16

(10)

17

Guo, S. J.; Zhang, S.; Sun, X. L.; Sun, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133

Yang, W.; Yu, Y.; Wang, L.; Yang, C.; Li, H. Nanoscale. 2015, 7 (7), 2877-

Bu, L.; Ding, J.; Guo, S.; Zhang, X.; Su, D.; Zhu, X.; Yao, J.; Guo, J.; Lu, G.;

Huang, X. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27 (44), 7204-7212.

18

(11)

Wang, C.; Hou, Y.; Kim, J.; Sun, S. Angew. Chem. 2007, 46 (33), 6333-6335.

19

(12)

Bu, L.; Guo, S.; Zhang, X.; Shen, X.; Su, D.; Lu, G.; Zhu, X.; Yao, J.; Guo,

20

J.; Huang, X. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11850-11860. 19

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Nano Letters 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

(13)

Bian, B.; Xia, W.; Du, J.; Zhang, J.; Liu, J. P.; Guo, Z.; Yan, A. Nanoscale.

2013, 5 (6), 2454-2459. (14)

Sun, S.; Murray, C. B.; Weller, D.; Folks, L.; Moser, A. Science. 2000, 287

(5460), 1989-1992. (15)

Jeyadevan, B.; Shinoda, K.; Justin, R. J.; Matsumoto, T. IEEE. T. Magn.

2006, 42 (10), 3030-3035. (16)

Chuanbing, R.; Daren, L.; Vikas, N.; Narayan, P.; Yong, D.; Zhonglin, W.;

Hao, Z.; JiuPing, L. Cheminform. 2007, 38 (6), 2984-2988.

9

(17)

Sun, S. H. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18 (4), 393-403.

10

(18)

Zeynali, H.; Akbari, H.; Arumugam, S. J, Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 23, 235-

11

237.

12

(19)

Lai, J.; Luque R.; Xu, G. ChemCatChem, 2015, 7 (20), 482-488.

13

(20)

Hu, X.; Agostinelli, E.; Ni, C.; Hadjipanayis, G.; Capobianchi, A. Green.

14 15 16 17 18 19

Chem. 2014, 16 (4), 2292-2297. (21)

Yamamoto, S.; Morimoto, Y.; Ono, T.; Takano, M. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005,

87 (032503), 1-3. (22)

Tamada, Y.; Yamamoto, S.; Takano, M.; Nasu, S.; Ono, T. Appl. Phys. Lett.

2007, 90 (162509), 1-3. (23)

Kim, J.; Rong, C.; Liu, J. P.; Sun, S. H. Adv. Mater. 2010, 21 (8), 906-909.

20

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 20 of 22

Page 21 of 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Nano Letters

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

(24)

Kim, J.; Rong, C.; Lee, Y.; Liu, J. P.; Sun, S. H. Chem. Mater. 2012, 20 (23),

7242-7245. (25)

Kang, S.; Miao, G.; Shi, S.; Jia, Z.; Nikles, D. E.; Harrell, J. J. Am. Chem.

Soc. 2006, 128 (4), 1042-1043. (26)

Li, Q.; Wu, L.; Wu, G.; Su, D.; Lv, H.; Zhang, S.; Zhu, W.; Casimir, A.; Zhu,

H.; Mendozagarcia, A. Nano. Lett. 2014, 15 (4), 2468-2473. (27)

Kang, S.; Jia, Z.; Nikles, D. E.; Harrell, J. W. IEEE. T. Magn. 2003, 39 (5),

2753-2757. (28)

Wang, H.; Shang, P.; Zhang, J.; Guo, M.; Mu, Y.; Li, Q.; Wang, H. Chem.

Mater. 2013, 25 (12), 2450-2454. (29)

Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Chen, X.; Shu, D.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H.;

Wang, Y.; Ruterana, P. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2017, 422, 470-474. (30)

Yu, Y. S.; Mukherjee, P.; Tian, Y.; Li, X. Z.; Shield, J. E.; Sellmyer, D. J.

Nanoscale. 2014, 6 (20), 12050-12055. (31)

Maeda, T.; Kai, T.; Kikitsu, A.; Nagase, T. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 80 (12),

2147-2149. (32)

Zhang, S.; Jiang, G.; Filsinger, G. T.; Wu, L.; Zhu, H.; Lee, J.; Wu, Z.; Sun,

S. H. Nanoscale. 2014, 6 (9), 4852-4856. (33)

Yang, Z.; Zhao, T.; Huang, X.; Chu, X.; Tang, T.; Ju, Y.; Wang, Q.; Hou, Y.;

Gao, S. Chem. Sc. 2017, 8 (1), 473-481. 21

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Nano Letters 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

1 2 3 4 5 6

(34)

Yang, C.; Zhao, H.; Hou, Y.; Ma, Ding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134 (38),

15814-15821. (35)

Yu, Y.; Goodfellow, B. W.; Rasch, M.; Bosoy, C.; Smilgies, D.; Korgel, B.

A. Langmuir. 2015, 31 (24), 6924-6932. (36)

Xie, S.; Peng, H. C.; Lu, N.; Wang, J.; Kim, M. J.; Xie, Z.; Xia, Y. J. Am.

Chem. Soc. 2013, 135 (44), 16658-16667.

7 8 9 10 11 12

TOC Graphic:

13 14

22

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 22 of 22