Heterometallic MnIII4Ln2 (Ln = Dy, Gd, Tb) Cross-Shaped Clusters

May 3, 2017 - Department of Chemistry, University of Cyprus, 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus. ‡ Department of Chemistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fl...
1 downloads 16 Views 1MB Size
Download PDF
Article pubs.acs.org/IC

Heterometallic MnIII4Ln2 (Ln = Dy, Gd, Tb) Cross-Shaped Clusters and Their Homometallic MnIII4MnII2 Analogues Maria Savva,† Katerina Skordi,† Adeline D. Fournet,‡ Annaliese E. Thuijs,‡ George Christou,‡ Spyros P. Perlepes,& Constantina Papatriantafyllopoulou,*,¶ and Anastasios J. Tasiopoulos*,† †

Department of Chemistry, University of Cyprus, 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus Department of Chemistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, United States & Department of Chemistry, University of Patras, Patras 26504, Greece ¶ School of Chemistry, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland ‡

S Supporting Information *

ABSTRACT: The employment of di-2-pyridyl ketone, (py)2CO, in heterometallic Mn/4f and homometallic Mn cluster chemistry has yielded six MnIII4Ln2 and two MnIII4MnII2 structurally related clusters, namely, [Mn4Ln2O2{(py)2CO2}4(NO3)2(RCO2)2(H2O)6](NO3)2 (Ln = Gd, 1, 5; Dy, 2; Tb, 3; R = Et, 1−3; Me, 5), [Mn4Dy2O2{(py)2CO2}4(NO3)4(EtCO2)2(H2O)3(MeOH)]·0.7MeOH·0.8H2O (4· 0.7MeOH·0.8H2O), [Mn4Gd2O2{(py)2CO2}4(NO3)4(C6H4ClCO2) 2(MeOH)2(py)2]·2MeOH (6·2MeOH), [Mn6O2{(py)2CO2}4(py)4(H2O)4](ClO4)4·4H2O (7·4H2O), and [Mn6O2{(py)2CO2}4(NO3)4(py)4] (8), where (py)2CO22− is the dianion of the gem-diol derivative of (py)2CO. The compounds possess a new type of cross-shaped structural core, which in the case of 1−6 is essentially planar, whereas in 7 and 8 it deviates from planarity. Clusters 1−6 are rare examples of Mn/4f species bearing (py)2CO or its derivatives, despite the fact that this ligand has been well-studied and proven a rich source of more than 200 metal compounds so far. Variable-temperature, solid-state direct-current and alternating-current magnetization studies were performed on complexes 1−5, 7, and 8 revealing that the dominant exchange interactions between the metal ions are antiferromagnetic and indicating ground-state spin values of S = 5 (for 1), 6 (for 5), and 2 (for 7 and 8).

■

their S = 2 spin state and a significant uniaxial anisotropy.14−18 Many Mn/Ln SMMs are now known, for example, Mn21Ln,14 Mn6Ln2,15 Mn12Gd,16 Mn11Gd2,17a Mn5Ln4,17b Mn9Dy8,17c and Mn8Dy818 species. Some of these compounds display enhanced SMM properties, such as the Mn6Tb2 cluster with Ueff = 103 K,15 and the Mn21Dy cluster with Ueff = 74 K14 comparable to that of the Mn12 family of SMMs, the first discovered and most studied such species to date.2a 3d/4f metal clusters are also of special importance in the field of magnetic refrigerants. Magnetic refrigeration is a cooling technique, which is based on the magnetocaloric effect (MCE). It is defined as the response of a ferri- or ferromagnet to an external magnetic field causing the change of its temperature.19 There are now known several species displaying enhanced MCE, the majority of which contain the f7 GdIII ion, since it provides zero magnetic anisotropy, as well as weak exchange interactions favoring the presence of low-lying spin states. High-nuclearity 3d/4f clusters, such as Co16Gd24,20a Co8Gd8,20b Co8Gd4,20c Cu36Gd24,21 M10Gd42 (M = CoII/III, NiII),11b Ni12Gd36,22a Ni64Gd96,22b Ni6Gd6,22c and Mn9Gd922d have been reported to display enhanced cooling properties. Among them, Co10Gd42 and Ni10Gd42 exhibit impressively large

INTRODUCTION The synthesis and characterization of 3d/4f polynuclear compounds have gained significant attention in recent times owing to their relevance to different research areas, including molecule-based magnetic materials and magnetic refrigerants.1 In the former field, such species often behave as single-molecule magnets (SMMs) exhibiting super-paramagnet behavior below a blocking temperature TB.2 Their properties originate from intrinsic structural and electronic characteristics of their metal cores, such as the large ground-spin state (S) and the large and negative Ising (or easy-axis) type of magnetoanisotropy D. SMMs are good candidates for many technological applications including high-density information storage,2 molecular spintronics,3 and qubits for quantum computation.4 Furthermore, quantum mechanical phenomena have been identified in SMMs, such as spin-state entanglement,4 spin-phonon coupling,5 spin-parity effects,6 both thermally assisted and pure quantum tunneling of the magnetization (QTM),7 quantum phase interference,8 and others.9 Most 4f ions exhibit large single-ion anisotropy and several unpaired electrons, providing all the requirements for a compound to behave as an SMM. Indeed, many 3d/4f SMMs have been reported, including Fe/4f,10 Co/4f,11 Ni/ 4f,11b,12 and Cu/4f13 compounds. However, the majority of 3d/ 4f SMMs are Mn/4f clusters bearing some MnIII centers with © 2017 American Chemical Society

Received: January 21, 2017 Published: May 3, 2017 5657

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00191 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 5657−5668

Article

Inorganic Chemistry

ray analysis, or collected by filtration and dried under vacuum. Yield: ∼60%. Anal. Calcd (Found) for 1: C, 32.13 (32.52); H, 2.91 (3.13); N, 8.99 (9.24)%. Selected IR data (KBr, cm−1): 3373 (m,b), 3145 (w), 2926 (w), 1585 (m), 1529 (m), 1483 (m), 1388 (s), 1313 (m), 1227 (m), 1209 (m), 1061 (s), 1032 (w), 978 (w), 939 (w), 901(w), 874 (w), 806 (w), 785 (w), 766 (w), 667 (m), 609 (s), 538 (m), 438 (w), 419 (w). [Mn4Dy2O2{(py)2CO2}4(NO3)2(EtCO2)2(H2O)6](NO3)2 (2). This was prepared in the same manner as complex 1 but using Dy(NO3)3·6H2O (0.399 g, 0.88 mmol) instead of Gd(NO3)3·6H2O. After two weeks, X-ray quality orange crystals of 2·solvents were collected by filtration, washed with MeCN (2 × 5 mL) and Et2O (2 × 5 mL), and dried under vacuum. Yield: ∼60%. Anal. Calcd (Found) for 2: C, 31.95 (32.25); H, 2.90 (3.18); N, 8.94 (9.26)%. Selected IR data (KBr, cm−1): 3370 (m,b), 3145 (w), 2924 (w), 1580 (m), 1530 (m), 1483 (m), 1393 (s), 1313 (m), 1225 (m), 1211 (m), 1063 (s), 1034 (w), 975 (w), 941 (w), 905 (w), 874 (w), 803 (w), 787 (w), 769 (w), 668 (m), 611 (s), 536(m), 438 (w), 417 (w). [Mn4Tb2O2{(py)2CO2}4(NO3)2(EtCO2)2(H2O)6](NO3)2 (3). This was prepared in the same manner as complex 1 but using Tb(NO3)3·6H2O (0.400 g, 0.92 mmol) instead of Gd(NO3)3·6H2O. After three weeks, X-ray quality orange crystals of 3·solvents were collected by filtration, washed with MeCN (2 × 5 mL) and Et2O (2 × 5 mL), and dried under vacuum. Yield: ∼60%. Anal. Calcd (Found) for 3: C, 32.07 (32.52); H, 2.91 (2.88); N, 8.98 (8.69)%. Selected IR data (KBr, cm−1): 3372 (m,b), 3144 (w), 2926 (w), 1585 (m), 1525 (m), 1485 (m), 1391 (s), 1314 (m), 1227 (m), 1207 (m), 1065 (s), 1032 (w), 978 (w), 938 (w), 902 (w), 876 (w), 803 (w), 785 (w), 768 (w), 669 (m), 603 (s), 538 (m), 439 (w), 418 (w). [Mn 4 Dy 2 O 2 {(py) 2 CO 2 } 4 (NO 3 ) 4 (EtCO 2 ) 2 (H 2 O) 3 (MeOH)]· 0.7MeOH·0.8H2O (4·0.7MeOH·0.8H2O). Solid Dy(NO3)3·6H2O (0.100 g, 0.22 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of [Mn3O(EtCO2)6(py)3](ClO4) (0.201 g, 0.21 mmol) and (py)2CO (0.149 g, 0.81 mmol) in MeOH (10 mL). The resulting red solution was stirred for 40 mins, filtered, and the filtrate was left in an open flask. Slow evaporation of the filtrate at room temperature yielded orange crystals of 4·0.7MeOH·0.8H2O, which were kept in mother liquor for X-ray analysis, or collected by filtration and dried under vacuum for other solid-state studies. Yield: ∼60%. Anal. Calcd (Found) for 4: C, 32.78 (33.04); H, 3.00 (3.27); N, 8.87 (9.09)%. Selected IR data (KBr, cm−1): 3395 (m, b), 2759 (w), 1576 (m), 1477 (m), 1450 (m), 1386 (s), 1302 (m), 1219 (w), 1155 (w), 1072 (s), 1016 (m), 897 (w), 817 (w), 771 (m), 697 (m), 670 (m), 631 (m), 561 (m). [Mn4Gd2O2{(py)2CO2}4(NO3)2(MeCO2)2(H2O)6](NO3)2 (5). To a stirred solution of N-butyldiethanolamine (bdeaH2) (0.160 mL, 0.98 mmol) and (py)2CO (0.099 g, 0.54 mmol) in MeCN (20 mL) was added solid Mn(MeCO2)2·4H2O (0.250 g, 1.02 mmol), which caused a rapid color change to red. The mixture was left under stirring for 15 min, Gd(NO3)3·6H2O (0.402 g, 0.89 mmol) was added, and the resulting solution was stirred for a further 3 h. Solid NBu4MnO4 (0.101 g, 0.28 mmol) was then added in small portions, the solution was left under stirring for 15 min, filtered, and the filtrate was left in an open flask. Slow evaporation of the solvent at room temperature gave orange crystals of 5·solvents, which were kept in mother liquor for Xray analysis or collected by filtration and dried under vacuum. Yield: ∼60%. Anal. Calcd (Found) for 5: C, 31.31 (31.64); H, 2.74 (3.09); N, 9.13 (9.25)%. Selected IR data (KBr, cm−1): 3408 (m, b), 2850 (w), 1590 (m), 1520 (m), 1473 (m), 1430 (m), 1384 (s), 1301 (m), 1219 (w), 1155 (w), 1103 (w), 1070 (m), 1045 (s), 895 (w), 812 (m), 777 (m), 694 (m), 670 (m), 636 (m), 565 (w). [Mn 4 Gd 2 O 2 {(py) 2 CO 2 } 4 (NO 3 ) 4 (C 6 H 4 ClCO 2 ) 2 (MeOH) 2 (py) 2 ]· 2MeOH (6·2MeOH). To a stirred solution of C6H4ClCO2Na (0.180 g, 1.01 mmol) and (py)2CO (0.099 g, 0.54 mmol) in MeOH/py (20/5 mL) was added Mn(NO3)2·4H2O (0.251 g, 1.00 mmol), which caused a rapid color change to dark red. The solution was left under stirring for 15 min, and then Gd(NO3)3·6H2O (0.402 g, 0.89 mmol) was added. The dark red solution was stirred for a further 2 h and filtered, and the filtrate was left in an open flask. Slow evaporation of the solvent at room temperature gave orange crystals of 6·2MeOH, which

MCEs,11b revealing their potential for use as magnetic coolers in the ultralow temperature range. From the above-mentioned, clearly 3d/4f metal clusters are very promising for the development of new species with enhanced magnetic properties. However, for this to be realized, it is very crucial to gain extensive knowledge on the way that 4f ions affect the properties of the isolated compounds. In this context, scientists working in this field are mainly focused on the isolation of low nuclearity compounds that are amenable to an in-depth magnetic analysis. Indeed, a lot of work has been done and has provided valuable information on how the isotropic or anisotropic nature of the 4f ion involved affects the nature and magnitude of the exchange interactions, as well as the dynamics of slow relaxation of magnetization in lownuclearity compounds.12a,23 However, the number of heterometallic compounds that are amenable to this approach is highly restricted by the nuclearity of the studied species. An alternative approach in this direction, which could be applied to polynuclear 3d/4f metal clusters, is based on the generation of a “library” that includes isostructural 3d/4f heterometallic and 3d homometallic clusters, that is, clusters with the same metal core and same bridging ligands that possibly differ in the terminal ligation. Comparison of the properties of homometallic and heterometallic compounds with identical or very similar structural features would definitely provide new insights for the magnetic understanding of metal clusters and SMMs. However, this approach is still in its infancy, and in fact there have been reported very few heterometallic compounds that possess the same structural core as homometallic clusters; these are mostly confined to tetranuclear compounds with a “butterfly” topology.23a−c,24 Herein, we report the synthesis and characterization of six Mn4Ln2 (Ln = Dy, Tb, Gd) and their homometallic Mn6 structural analogues. The reported compounds possess an uncommon cross-shaped metal core25 and bear a di-2-pyridyl ketone ((py)2CO) derivative as the primary chelating organic ligand. Notably, although (py)2CO has been extensively studied in 3d and 3d/4f metal cluster chemistry, the reported compounds are uncommon Mn/Ln species containing this ligand.26 Furthermore, direct current (dc) and alternating current (ac) magnetic susceptibility studies were performed on representative compounds and revealed that one of the Mn4Dy2 compounds displays out-of-phase ac tails revealing the existence of a slow relaxation of the magnetization process at very low temperatures.

■

EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Synthesis. All manipulations were performed under aerobic conditions using materials as received. Mn(EtCO2)2·2H2O, [Mn3O(EtCO2)6(py)3](ClO4), and NBu4MnO4 were prepared as previously reported.27 Caution! Although no such behavior was observed during the present work, perchlorate, nitrate, azide, and organic permanganate salts are potentially explosive; they should be synthesized and used in small quantities and treated with care. [Mn4Gd2O2{(py)2CO2}4(NO3)2(EtCO2)2(H2O)6](NO3)2 (1). To a solution of 1,3-propanediol (H2pd) (0.300 mL, 4.15 mmol) and NEt3 (0.279 mL, 2.00 mmol) in MeCN (20 mL) was added solid Mn(EtCO2)2·2H2O (0.300 g, 1.27 mmol) under stirring. To the resulting red solution was added solid (py)2CO (0.099 g, 0.54 mmol), and the solution was left under stirring for 1 h. Then, solid Gd(NO3)3· 6H2O (0.402 g, 0.89 mmol) was added, the solution was stirred for a further 15 min under mild heat, filtered, and the filtrate was left in an open flask. Slow evaporation of the filtrate at room temperature gave orange crystals of 1·solvents, which were kept in mother liquor for X5658

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00191 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 5657−5668

Article

Inorganic Chemistry Table 1. Crystallographic Data for Complexes 1−8 parameter

1·solvents

2·solvent

3·solvents

4·0.7MeOH·0.8H2O

empirical formula formula weight crystal system space group a (Å) b (Å) c (Å) β (deg) V (Å3) Z ρcalc (g cm−3) radiation, λ (Å) μ (mm−1) temperature (K) measd/independent reflns parameters refined GOF (on F2) R1a (I > 2σ(I)) wR2b (I > 2σ(I)) (Δρ)max/(Δρ)min (e Å−3) parameter

C50H42Gd2Mn4N12O32 1857.19 trigonal R3̅ 37.2321(12) 37.2321(12) 24.4488(9) 90 29351.0(17) 9 0.946 0.710 73 1.428 100(2) 20053/11446 441 0.999 0.0694 0.1791 2.377/−1.583 5·solvents

C50H44Dy2Mn4N10O26 1745.71 trigonal R3̅ 37.581(5) 37.581(5) 24.268(5) 90 29683(8) 9 0.879 0.710 73 1.532 100(2) 62897/11604 419 1.101 0.0458 0.1395 1.067/−0.550 6·2MeOH

C50H42Tb2Mn4N10O26 1736.54 trigonal R3̅ 37.293(5) 37.293(5) 24.475(5) 90 29479(8) 9 0.880 0.710 73 1.481 100(2) 21356/11374 415 1.003 0.0936 0.2403 2.318/−2.872 7·4H2O

C51.7H48.1Dy2Mn4 N12O31.5 1886.25 monoclinic P21/n 16.7857(16) 20.4275(19) 22.1167(18) 99.130(9) 7487.5(12) 4 1.678 0.710 73 2.711 100(2) 58548/13151 947 1.042 0.0363 0.0863 1.870/−1.421 8·solvents

empirical formula formula weight crystal system space group a (Å) b (Å) c (Å) β (deg) V (Å3) Z ρcalc (g cm−3) radiation, λ (Å) μ (mm−1) temperature (K) measd/independent reflns parameters refined GOF (on F2) R1a (I > 2σ(I)) wR2b (I > 2σ(I)) (Δρ)max/(Δρ)min (e Å−3) a

C48H38Gd2Mn4N12O32 1829.16 monoclinic P21/n 10.743(5) 23.668(5) 14.565(5) 94.123(5) 3694(2) 2 1.645 0.710 73 2.519 100(2) 19 567/6483 442 1.059 0.0411 0.0996 1.16/−0.970

C72H62Cl2Gd2Mn4N14O30 2208.52 orthorhombic Pna21 24.0267(9) 17.1784(4) 20.7235(6) 90 8553.4(5) 4 1.715 0.710 73 2.252 100(2) 32 767/12 354 1120 1.043 0.0460 0.1227 2.994/−1.083

C64H64Cl4Mn6N12O34 2016.71 orthorhombic Cmca 23.3908(18) 16.0481(13) 21.000(2) 90 7882.9(12) 4 1.699 0.710 73 1.164 100(2) 10 167/3560 327 1.067 0.0653 0.1849 1.101/−0.840

C64H52Mn6N16O22 1726.86 monoclinic I2/m 12.3330(8) 30.364(2) 26.7615(17) 101.072(6) 9835.0(12) 4 1.166 0.710 73 0.810 100(2) 17 190/8709 487 0.927 0.0889 0.2197 0.792/−0.957

R1 = Σ(|F0| − |Fc|)/Σ(|F0|). bwR2 = {Σ[w(F02 − Fc2)2]/Σ[w(F02)2]}1/2.

were kept in mother liquor for X-ray analysis, or collected by filtration and dried under vacuum. Yield: ∼45%. Anal. Calcd (Found) for 6: C, 39.13 (39.61); H, 2.72 (2.89); N, 9.13 (8.93)%. Selected IR data (KBr, cm−1): 3385 (m, b), 2860 (w), 1582 (m), 1530 (m), 1498 (w), 1435 (m), 1392 (s), 1323 (w), 1215 (w), 1127 (w), 1104 (m), 1078 (m), 1053 (s), 971 (w), 902 (w), 813 (w), 755 (w), 703 (w), 670 (m) 631 (m), 564 (w). [Mn6O2{(py)2CO2}4(py)4(H2O)4](ClO4)4·4H2O (7·4H2O). Method A. To a solution of H2pd (0.300 mL, 4.15 mmol) in MeCN/py (20/2 mL) was added Mn(ClO4)2·6H2O (0.750 g, 2.95 mmol) under stirring resulting in the formation of a dark red solution. This was stirred for 5 min, and then (py)2CO (0.099 g, 0.54 mmol) and HCO2Na (0.067 g, 0.98 mmol) were added under vigorous stirring. The solution was stirred for a further 20 h and filtered, and the filtrate was left in an open flask. Slow evaporation led to the formation of red crystals of 7· 4H2O, which were kept in contact with the mother liquor for X-ray analysis, or collected by filtration and dried under vacuum. Yield: ∼60%. Anal. Calcd (Found) for 7: C, 39.45 (39.17); H, 3.10 (3.26); N, 8.63 (8.77)%. Selected IR data (KBr, cm−1): 3390 (s, b), 2950 (w),

2883 (w), 1603 (m), 1543 (w), 1485 (w), 1443 (m), 1303 (w), 1221 (w), 1148 (s), 1086 (s), 1014 (s), 812 (w), 787 (w), 752 (m), 704 (m), 670 (m), 573 (w), 540 (w), 507 (w), 409 (w). Method B. Method A was repeated without the addition of pdH2. Slow evaporation of the solvent at room temperature gave red crystals (yield: ∼60%). The product was identified as 7·4H2O by IR spectral comparison with authentic material and from unit cell determinations. [Mn6O2{(py)2CO2}4(NO3)4(py)4] (8). Method A. To a stirred solution of H2pd (0.300 mL, 4.15 mmol) in EtOH/py (20/2 mL) was added solid Mn(NO3)2·4H2O (0.751 g, 2.99 mmol) resulting in a dark red solution. The solution was stirred for a further 5 min, and then (py)2CO (0.099 g, 0.54 mmol), MeCO2Na (0.080 g, 0.98 mmol), and NaN3 (0.070 g, 1.08 mmol) were added under vigorous stirring. The solution was stirred for a further 4 d, filtered, and the filtrate was left undisturbed in a closed flask at room temperature. This gave red crystals of 8·solvents, which were kept in contact with the mother liquor for X-ray analysis, or collected by filtration and dried under vacuum. Yield: ∼60%. Anal. Calcd (Found) for 8: C, 44.52 (44.81); H, 3.04 (3.36); N, 12.98 (13.17)%. Selected IR data (KBr, cm−1): 3360 5659

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00191 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 5657−5668

Article

Inorganic Chemistry (s,b), 3100 (w) 2950 (w), 1601 (s), 1474 (m), 1435 (s), 1383 (s), 1298 (m), 1238 (w), 1219 (w), 1113 (w), 1099 (w), 1076 (s), 1020 (s), 976 (w), 885 (w), 812 (w), 785 (w), 752 (m), 698 (m), 665 (m), 636 (m), 569 (w), 534 (w), 513 (w), 413 (w). Method B. Method A was repeated without the addition of pdH2. Slow evaporation of the solvent led to the formation of red crystals (yield: ∼60%). The product was identified as 8 by IR spectral comparison with authentic material and from unit cell determinations. X-ray Crystallography. Data were collected on an OxfordDiffraction SuperNova diffractometer equipped with a CCD area detector and a graphite monochromator utilizing Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.710 73 Å). Selected crystals were attached to glass fiber with paratone-N oil and transferred to a goniostat for data collection. Empirical absorption corrections (multiscan based on symmetryrelated measurements) were applied using CrysAlis RED software.28 The structures were solved by direct methods using SIR9229a and refined on F2 using full-matrix least-squares using SHELXL9729b and SHELXL-2014/7.29c Software packages used: CrysAlisCCD28 for data collection, CrysAlisRED28 for cell refinement and data reduction, WINGX for geometric calculations,29d while DIAMOND30a and MERCURY30b were used for molecular graphics. The program SQUEEZE,31 a part of the PLATON package of crystallographic software, was used to remove contribution of highly disordered solvent molecules in 1−5 and 8. Although many experiments were performed to grow better quality crystals of compounds 2−4 and several crystallographic data sets were also collected, the NO3− counterions were highly disordered in every case, thus their contribution was removed using the program SQUEEZE.31 For all compounds, the nonH atoms were treated anisotropically, whereas the H atoms were placed in calculated, ideal positions and refined as riding on their respective C atoms. In some cases, the H atoms of the H2O and MeOH solvent molecules could not be located. Unit cell parameters and structure solution and refinement data for complexes 1−8 are listed in Table 1. Physical Studies. Infrared spectra were recorded in the solid state (KBr pellets) on a Shimadzu Prestige-21 spectrometer in the 4000− 400 cm−1 range. Variable-temperature dc and ac magnetic susceptibility data were collected at the University of Florida using a Quantum Design MPMS-XL SQUID susceptometer equipped with a 7 T magnet and operating in the 1.8−300 K range. Samples were embedded in solid eicosane to prevent torquing. The ac magnetic susceptibility measurements were performed in an oscillating ac field of 3.5 G and a zero dc field. The oscillation frequencies were in the 5− 1488 Hz range. Pascal’s constants were used to estimate the diamagnetic corrections, which were subtracted from the experimental susceptibilities to give the molar paramagnetic susceptibility (χM).

well-shaped orange crystals of compounds 1−3 with the general formula [Mn4Ln2O2{(py)2CO2}4(NO3)2(EtCO2)2(H2O)6](NO3)2 were subsequently isolated. The formation of 1−3 is summarized in eq 1. (py)2CO exists in its dianionic gem-diolate form, (py)2CO22−, whose formation involves a nucleophilic attack by the H2O molecule on the carbonyl group. 4Mn(EtCO2 )2 ·2H 2O + 2Ln(NO3)3 ·6H 2O + 4(py)2 CO + O2 MeCN

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯→ [Mn4Ln 2O2 {(py)2 CO2 }4 (NO3)2 (EtCO2 )2 (H 2O)6 ](NO3)2 + 8H+ + 6EtCO2− + 2NO3− + 10H 2O (Ln = Gd, 1; Dy, 2; Tb, 3)

(1)

After the crystallographic characterization of 1−3, which revealed that they possess aesthetically pleasing structures with a rare metal topology, this reaction system was investigated in detail. Thus, many reactions were performed involving the employment of different metal sources, as well as various RCOOH (R = Me, Et, C6H4Cl) leading to the isolation of three new compounds, namely, [Mn 4 Dy 2 O 2 {(py) 2 CO 2 } 4 (NO3)4(EtCO2)2(MeOH)4] (4), [Mn4Gd2O2{(py)2CO2}4(NO3)2(MeCO2)2(H2O)6](NO3)2 (5), and [Mn4Gd2O2{(py)2CO2}4(NO3)4(C6H4ClCO2)2(MeOH)2(py)2] (6) that are structurally related to 1−3. The formation of 4−6 is summarized in eqs 2−4. In particular, the reaction of [Mn 3 O(EtCO 2 ) 6 (py) 3 ](ClO 4 ), Dy(NO 3 ) 3 ·6H 2 O and (py)2CO in MeOH yielded a dark red solution, from which orange crystals of 4 were isolated after a few days. The reaction of Mn(MeCO2)2·4H2O, Gd(NO3)3·6H2O, (py)2CO, Nbutyldiethanolamine (bdeaH2), and NBu4MnO4 in MeCN provided access to compound 5, whereas the reaction of Mn(NO 3 ) 2 ·4H 2 O, Gd(NO 3 ) 3 ·6H 2 O, (py) 2 CO, and C6H4ClCO2Na in MeOH/py (4:1 v/v) afforded a dark red solution, from which compound 6 was isolated in fairly high yield. We note that the formation of 5 can also take place without the addition of NBu4MnO4, which facilitates the oxidation of Mn; however, longer stirring time is required, whereas the yield of the reaction is much lower. The aliphatic diols that were added in the reaction mixtures that yielded clusters 1−3 and 5 played a crucial role in their synthesis and/ or isolation; experiments in the absence of diols have led to amorphous materials that could not be further characterized.

■

4[Mn3O(EtCO2 )6 (py)3 ](ClO4 ) + 6Dy(NO3)3 · 6H 2O + 12(py)2 CO + 12MeOH

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Synthesis. The use of (py)2CO in 3d metal cluster chemistry has been extensively investigated over the years leading to the isolation of a variety of new compounds with interesting structural features and magnetic properties.26 The attractive characteristic of this ligand is its carbonyl group, which can undergo nucleophilic attack upon coordination yielding a variety of transformed derivatives with rich coordination chemistry and bridging capability. However, there is only a handful of 3d/4f species bearing (py)2CO and its derivatives, including Fe2Ln, Ni2Ln, Ni3Ln, and Cr4Ln examples.12a,23d−g The absence of a systematic study of the Mn/4f/(py)2CO system is noticeable considering the great development of this research field over the recent years. On the basis of this, we decided to use of (py)2CO in Mn/4f carboxylate chemistry exploring its potential to yield new highnuclearity clusters and SMMs. The reaction of Mn(EtCO2)2·2H2O, Ln(NO3)3·6H2O (Ln = Gd, 1; Dy, 2; Tb, 3), (py)2CO, and NEt3 in the presence of 1,3propanediol (H2pd) afforded a dark red solution from which

MeOH

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯→ 3[Mn4Dy2O2 {(py)2 CO2 }4 (NO3)4 (EtCO2 )2 (MeOH)4 ] (4) + 12pyH+ + 16H+ + 6NO3− + 4ClO4− + 18EtCO2− + 22H 2O

(2) 4Mn(MeCO2 )2 ·4H 2O + 2Gd(NO3)3 ·6H 2O + 4(py)2 CO + O2 MeCN

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯→ [Mn4Gd 2O2 {(py)2 CO2 }4 (NO3)2 (MeCO2 )2 (H 2O)6 ](NO3)2 (5) + 8H+ + 6MeCO2− + 2NO3− + 18H 2O

(3)

4Mn(NO3)2 ·4H 2O + 2Gd(NO3)3 ·6H 2O + 4(py)2 CO + 2C6H4ClCO2 Na + O2 + 2MeOH + 2py MeOH

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯→ [Mn4Gd 2O2 {(py)2 CO2 }4 (NO3)4 (C6H4ClCO2 )2 (MeOH)2 (py)2 ] (6) + 24H 2O + 8H+ + 2Na + + 10NO3−

(4)

The unusual cross-shaped metal core that is observed in clusters 1−6 is thermodynamically favored, as evidenced by the fact that these compounds were obtained under a variety of reaction conditions. As a consequence, the isolation of the structurally related homometallic mixed-valent Mn6 com5660

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00191 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 5657−5668

Article

Inorganic Chemistry pounds, namely, [Mn6O2{(py)2CO2}4(py)4(H2O)4](ClO4)4 (7) and [Mn6O2{(py)2CO2}4(NO3)4(py)4] (8), was also feasible. In particular, the reaction of Mn(ClO4)2·xH2O, (py)2CO, HCO2Na, and H2pd in MeCN/py yielded a dark red solution from which 7 was isolated, whereas the reaction of Mn(NO3)2·4H2O, (py)2CO, MeCO2Na, NaN3, and H2pd in EtOH/py provided access to 8. The stoichiometric reactions that afforded compounds 7 and 8 are summarized in eqs 5 and 6.

Table 2. Selected Interatomic Distances (Å) and Angles (deg) for 1 Mn(1)−O(1) Mn(1)−O(1′)a Mn(1)−O(2′) Mn(1)−O(5) Mn(1)−O(16) Mn(2)−O(1′) Mn(2)−O(3) Mn(2)−O(4) Mn(2)−O(12) Mn(2)−N(2) Mn(2)−N(3) Mn(1)−O(16)−Gd(1) Mn(1)−O(2′)−Gd(1) Mn(1)−O(1)−Mn(2′)

6Mn(ClO4 )2 + 4(py)2 CO + O2 + 8H 2O + 4py MeCN/py

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯→ [Mn6O2 {(py)2 CO2 }4 (py)4 (H 2O)4 ](ClO4 )4 (7) + 8H+ + 8ClO4 −

(5)

6Mn(NO3)2 ·4H 2O + 4(py)2 CO + O2 + 4py

Gd(1)−O(6) Gd(1)−O(7) Gd(1)−O(2′) Gd(1)−O(10) Gd(1)−O(11) Gd(1)−N(1) Gd(1)−N(4′) Mn(1)···Mn(1′) Mn(1)···Gd(1) Gd(1)···Gd(1′) Mn(2)···Mn(2′) Mn(1)−O(1)−Mn(1′) Mn(1′)−O(1)−Mn(2′)

2.388(4) 2.502(4) 2.367(3) 2.393(4) 2.428(5) 2.568(5) 2.593(4) 2.803(5) 3.416(5) 9.607(5) 6.434(5) 98.2(2) 131.1(2)

Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms: (′) −x + 2/3, −y + 1/3, −z + 1/3.

a

EtOH/py

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯→ [Mn6O2 {(py)2 CO2 }4 (NO3)4 (py)4 ] (8) + 8H+ + 8NO3− + 20H 2O

1.853(3) 1.856(3) 1.936(3) 2.157(4) 1.946(3) 2.003(3) 1.865(4) 1.861(4) 2.187(4) 2.089(4) 2.098(4) 104.7(2) 104.6(2) 130.8(2)

(6)

Structural figures for 2−6 are provided in the Supporting Information (Figures S1−S5). Complex 1 crystallizes in the trigonal space group R3̅. Its structure consists of a [Mn4Gd2O2{(py)2CO2}4(NO3)2(EtCO2)2(H2O)6]2+ cation and NO3− counterions. The cation of 1 possesses a cross-shaped [MnIII4Gd2(μ3-O)2(μ-OR)4]10+ core, which is uncommon in metal-cluster chemistry. In particular, it has never been reported before in a 3d/4f metal cluster, whereas it has been observed one more time in homometallic 3d metal cluster chemistry.25 Alternatively, the structural core of 1 can be described as consisting of a [MnIII4(μ3-O)2]8+ butterfly unit that is linked through four η1:η2:η1:η1:μ3 (py)2CO22− ligands (Scheme 1) to two GdIII ions,

Note that after the determination of the crystal structures of compounds 7 and 8, which revealed that H2pd is absent from the final products, their synthesis was successfully repeated without the addition of H2pd in the reaction mixture. Description of Structures. Representations of the molecular structure and the structural core of 1 are shown in Figure 1. Selected interatomic distances and angles are listed in Table 2. Compounds 1−6 possess related structures containing the same [MnIII4Ln2(μ3-O)2(μ-OR)4]10+ core (Ln = Gd, 1, 5, 6· 2MeOH; Dy, 2, 4; Tb, 3). Thus, only the structure of 1 will be described in detail, and it will be compared to those of 2−6.

Scheme 1. Crystallographically Established Coordination Mode of (py)2CO22− in Complexes 1−8

one at each side. All the metal and O atoms in the structural core of 1 are arranged in an almost planar configuration with the largest deviation from the mean plane defined by the metal and O atoms of the core being ∼0.18 Å for Mn1 (and Mn1′; Figure 2, left). The two Gd III ions are nine-coordinate with their coordination spheres being completed by two η1:η1:μ EtCO2− ions, two chelating NO3− ions, and four H2O molecules. Mn2 and Mn2′ are six-coordinate displaying a distorted octahedral geometry, and their coordination sphere is completed by two additional H2O molecules. Mn1 (and Mn1′) is five-coordinate with square pyramidal geometry; the O5 (and O5′) atom of the propionate ion occupies the apical position. The Mn oxidation states and the protonation level of O2− ions were confirmed by charge considerations, bond-valence sum (BVS) calculations32 (BVS calculations for Mn and O atoms gave values 2.81 and 3.16 for Mn3+ and 1.81 for O2−), and the observation of Jahn− Teller distortions at the octahedral MnIII ions.

Figure 1. Structure of the cation of 1 (top) and its [MnIII4Ln2(μ3O)2(μ-OR)4]10+ structural core (bottom). Color code: MnIII, blue; GdIII, pink; O, red; N, green; C, gray. The hydrogen atoms and solvent molecules were omitted for clarity. 5661

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00191 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 5657−5668

Article

Inorganic Chemistry

Figure 2. Structural cores of 1 (left) and 7 (right) emphasizing the relative planarity of the metal and O atoms. Color code: MnIII, blue; MnII, yellow; GdIII, pink; O, red.

Figure 3. Structure of the cation of 7 (left) and its [MnIII4MnII2(μ3-O)2(μ-OR)4]8+ structural core (right). Color code: MnIII, blue; MnII, yellow; O, red; N, green; C, gray. The H atoms and solvent molecules were omitted for clarity.

The program SHAPE was used to deduce the coordination polyhedra formed by the donor atoms around the GdIII ions, comparing the experimental structural data with the theoretical data for the most common polyhedral structures with nine vertices.33,34 There are no Platonic, Archimedean, or Catalan polyhedra with nine vertices, as well as no prisms or antiprisms can be made with an odd number of vertices; thus, the main semiregular three-dimensional figures that may be considered33 are the octagonal pyramid, the heptagonal bipyramid, and five Johnson polyhedra (capped cube, capped square antiprism, tricapped trigonal prism, tridiminished icosahedron, triangular cupola). The best fit was obtained for a tricapped trigonal prism. The crystal structure of 1 is stabilized by strong hydrogen bonds between the O atoms of terminally ligated H2O molecules (O12), which act as donors, and O atoms of NO3− counterions (O14), which act as acceptors [O12···O14 = 2.86(2) Å]. The cations of 1 are relatively well-isolated with the shortest metal···metal separation between the neighboring Mn4Gd2 units being 9.384(2) Å (Mn2···Gd1). The structures of compounds 2−6 are similar to that of 1, with their main differences being in (i) the type of LnIII ion (2, 4, DyIII; 3, TbIII); (ii) the charge of the compound: 4· 0.7MeOH·0.8H2O and 6·2MeOH are neutral instead of cationic (1). The charge balance is achieved by the coordination of two additional NO3− in 4·0.7MeOH·0.8H2O and 6·2MeOH, which in case of 1 act as counterions; (iii) the terminal ligation: one MeOH and three H2O molecules in 4· 0.7MeOH·0.8H2O, two MeOH and two py in 6·2MeOH, instead of six H2O molecules in 1; and (iv) the kind of the carboxylate ligand: MeCO2− in 5 and ClPhCO2− in 6·2MeOH, instead of EtCO2− in 1. Representations of the molecular structure and the structural core of compound 7·4H2O are shown in Figure 3, and selected interatomic distances and angles are listed in Table 3.

Table 3. Selected Interatomic Distances (Å) and Angles (deg) for 7·4H2O Mn(1)−O(4) Mn(1)−O(3) Mn(1)−O(2‴)a Mn(1)−N(‴) Mn(2)−O(5″) Mn(2)−O(2‴) Mn(2)−N(2) Mn(3)−O(1‴) Mn(1)−O(2)−Mn(2) Mn(2)−O(5)−Mn(2′)

2.141(7) 2.152(5) 2.175(3) 2.301(4) 1.866(3) 1.882(3) 2.203(6) 1.892(3) 103.9(2) 97.6(2)

Mn(3)−O(1″) Mn(3)−O(5) Mn(3)−N(4) Mn(3)−N(3) Mn(1)···Mn(1′) Mn(1)···Mn(2) Mn(2)···Mn(2′) Mn(3)···Mn(3″) Mn(2)−O(5)−Mn(3)

1.892(3) 1.902(4) 2.107(6) 2.285(4) 8.944(4) 3.200(4) 2.808(4) 6.264(4) 131.2(2)

a

Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms: (′) x, −y, −z; (″) −x + 2, −y, −z; (‴) −x + 2, y, z.

Complex 7·4H2O crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Cmca. Its structure consists of a [Mn6O2{(py)2CO2}4(py)4(H2O)4]4+ cation, ClO4− counterions, and H2O solvent molecules. The centrosymmetric cation possesses a crossshaped [MnIII4MnII2(μ3-O)2(μ-OR)4]8+ core, which is similar to the one present in compounds 1−6 with the LnIII ions being replaced by MnII ions. However, in this case the core is distorted; thus, the Mn and O atoms do not adopt a planar configuration as happens with the structural cores of 1−6. In particular, the structural core of 7·4H2O consists of a planar [Mn4(μ3-O)2]8+ butterfly unit that is linked through four η1:η2:η1:η1:μ3 (py)2CO22− ligands to two MnII ions (Mn1 and Mn1′), lying 1.60 (2) Å above and below the plane defined by the atoms of the [Mn4(μ3-O)2]8+ butterfly core (Figure 2, right). The coordination sphere of the metal ions is completed by four py and four H2O molecules. The MnII and two of the MnIII ions (Mn3 and its symmetry equivalent) are six-coordinate with distorted octahedral geometry, whereas the remaining MnIII 5662

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00191 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 5657−5668

Article

Inorganic Chemistry atoms (Mn2 and its symmetry equivalent) are five-coordinate adopting a square pyramidal coordination geometry. The Mn oxidation states and the protonation level of O2− ions were determined by charge considerations, BVS calculations32 (BVS calculations for Mn and O atoms gave values 3.01 and 3.02 for Mn3+, 1.97 for Mn2+ and 1.93 for O2−), and the observation of Jahn−Teller distortions for the octahedral MnIII ions, which take the form of axial elongation of the N3−Mn3−N3′ and the symmetry equivalent axes. Closer inspection of the crystal structure of 7·4H2O reveals that there are strong H-bonding interactions involving the bound and lattice H 2 O molecules, alkoxy groups of (py)2CO22−, and O atoms of ClO4− counterions. Although there are extended H-bonding interactions in 7·4H2O, there are no direct H-bonds linking neighboring Mn6 units, and, as a result, these are fairly well-separated with the shortest metal··· metal distance between neighboring molecules of 7·4H2O being 8.438 Å (Mn1···Mn1). The structure of compound 8 (Figure S6) is similar to that of 7·4H2O, with the main difference being the replacement of the four terminal H2O molecules in 7·4H2O by four nitrato ligands in 8; as a result, 7·4H2O is a cationic, whereas 8 is a neutral compound. Furthermore, there are no significant intermolecular interactions in 8. Compounds 1−6 are uncommon examples of Mn/Ln clusters bearing di-2-pyridyl ketone, (py)2CO. (py)2CO is a very well-studied organic ligand with rich coordination chemistry that has led to a variety of homometallic and heterometallic clusters with interesting structural features and magnetic properties.26 However, very few Mn/Ln clusters with this ligand or any of its derivatives have been reported.26c Thus, 1−6 fill an important literature gap providing new insights for the coordination chemistry of (py)2CO. In addition, they possess a planar cross-shaped structural core, which has never been observed before in mixed metal cluster chemistry.25 The same structural core, although slightly distorted, is observed in the homometallic clusters 7·4H2O and 8; in addition, the latter bear (py)2CO22−, which adopt the same coordination mode as in the case of 1−6. Thus, the reported MnIII4MnII2 compounds and MnIII4LnIII2 represent an uncommon collection of homometallic compounds (7 and 8) and their heterometallic analogues (1−6) possessing related crystal structures, which display novel structural features. Magnetic Susceptibility Studies. Solid-state, variabletemperature dc magnetic susceptibility (χM) data were collected on vacuum-dried microcrystalline samples of complexes 1−5, 7, and 8 suspended in eicosane to prevent torquing, in the 5.0− 300 K range in a 0.1 T (1000 Oe) magnetic field, and they are shown in Figure 4 as χMT versus T plots. For 1, χMT slightly decreases with decreasing temperature from 17.47 cm3 mol−1 K at 300 K to 14.50 cm3 mol−1 K at 5.0 K. The χMT value at 300 K is much lower than the calculated spin-only (g = 2.00) value of 27.75 cm3 mol−1 K expected for two non-interacting Gd3+ and four non-interacting Mn3+ ions, indicating the presence of predominantly antiferromagnetic exchange interactions between the metal centers. The 5 K χMT value indicates that 1 has an S = 5 ground-state spin value; the spin-only (g = 2) value for S = 5 is 15 cm3 mol−1 K. The χMT for 2 steadily decreases with decreasing temperature from 27.46 cm3 mol−1 K at 300 K to 20.91 cm3 mol−1 K at 5.0 K. The χMT at 300 K is lower than the 40.34 cm3 mol−1 K calculated for four MnIII and two DyIII (6H15/2 free ion, S = 5/2, L = 5, gJ = 4/3) non-interacting ions. For 3, χMT at 300 K is 21.00 cm3 K mol−1, lower than the 35.64

Figure 4. (top) χMT vs T plots for complexes 1 (●), 2 (○), 3 (▼), 4 (▽), and 5 (■); (bottom) χMT vs T plots for complexes 7 (○) and 8 (●).

cm3 K mol−1 calculated for four MnIII and two TbIII (7F6 free ion, S = 3, L = 3, gJ = 3/2) non-interacting ions. It slowly decreases with decreasing temperature to 20 K and then more rapidly to 14.29 cm3 K mol−1 at 5.0 K. The χMT for 4 steadily decreases with decreasing temperature from 31.55 cm3 mol−1 K at 300 K to 19.06 cm3 mol−1 K at 5.0 K. The 300 K value is lower than the spin-only value of 40.34 cm3 mol−1 K for four MnIII and two DyIII non-interacting ions. For 5, χMT slightly decreases with decreasing temperature from 24.19 cm3 mol−1 K at 300 K to 22.36 cm3 mol−1 K at 90 K, remains relatively constant to 20 K, and decreases to 20.47 cm3 mol−1 K at 5 K. The χMT value at 300 K is slightly lower than the predicted spin-only (g = 2.00) value of 27.75 cm3 mol−1 K expected for two non-interacting Gd3+ and four non-interacting Mn3+ ions. The 5 K χMT value indicates that 5 possesses a ground-state spin value of S = 6 (the spin-only value for S = 6 is 21 cm3 mol−1 K). For complexes 1−5, the χMT versus T profiles are similar and consistent with dominant antiferromagnetic (AF) intramolecular exchange interactions. Note that antiferromagnetic interactions are very common in MnIII−Gd and other 3d4f species possessing unoccupied 3dx2−y2 orbital, for example, CoII (low spin)−Gd, CrIII−Gd.23a,c,35 For the homometallic compounds 7 and 8, the χMT value at 300 K is much lower (7, 13.02 cm3 mol−1 K; 8, 15.09 cm3 mol−1 K) than the calculated spin-only (g = 2.00) value of 20.75 cm3 mol−1 K expected for two Mn2+ and four Mn3+ noninteracting ions, indicating the existence of strong antiferro5663

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00191 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 5657−5668

Article

Inorganic Chemistry magnetic exchange interactions between the metal centers. χMT steadily decreases with decreasing temperature to 50 K (7, 9.85 cm3 mol−1 K; 8, 11.57 cm3 mol−1 K) and then more rapidly to 3.85 cm3 K mol−1, for 7, and to 4.75 cm3 K mol−1 ,for 8, at 5.0 K. The χMT values at low temperature are indicative of a very low or diamagnetic ground state for both compounds. Magnetization (M) data were also collected for 1, 5, 7, and 8 in the 0.1−7 T and 1.8−10.0 K ranges, and these were plotted as reduced magnetization (M/NμB) versus H/T (Figures S7 and S8). We collected data at a wide range of magnetic fields, including low-field data to avoid problems caused by the existence of low-lying excited states and/or intermolecular interactions.36 However, it was not feasible to obtain a good quality fit assuming that only the ground state is populated in this temperature range. This reveals that the complexes possess low-lying excited states, populated even at these relatively low temperatures. The ac susceptibility studies were performed on complexes 1−5, 7, and 8 in the 1.8−15 K region in zero applied field with a 3.5 Oe driving field to probe for slow magnetization relaxation. The ac susceptibility data for complex 4, shown as χ′MT versus T in Figure 5, top, were collected at various

bottom) indicating that 4 may display a slow relaxation process at very low T indicative of single-molecule magnetism behavior. The ac susceptibility studies of complexes 1−3 and 5 (χ′MT vs T, Figures S9−S12) are in good agreement with the dc data at the same temperature range. However, no frequency-dependent drop is seen in the in-phase plots at low temperatures, and consequently no signal is observed in the ac out-of-phase plots (χ″M, Figures S9−S12) indicating that complexes 1−3 and 5 do not display SMM behavior. The ac susceptibility studies use no dc field being an excellent complementary tool for determining the ground-state spin value S by avoiding potential complications from a large dc field.36 The in-phase susceptibility χ′M data for 1 (Figure S9) and 5 (Figure S12) reveal that the χ′MT values are ∼15.9 and ∼22.6 cm3 mol−1 K at 15 K, remain almost constant down to ∼7 K, and then decrease to ∼12.8 and 17.5 cm3 mol−1 K, respectively, at 1.8 K. Extrapolation of the χ′MT signal to 0 K from T > ∼7 K (to avoid the effects of intermolecular interactions at lower temperatures) gives values of ∼14.1 and ∼21 cm3 mol−1K indicating an ST = 5 (with g ≈ 1.94) and ST = 6 (with g ≈ 2.00) for 1 and 5, respectively, confirming the conclusions from the dc studies. The ac susceptibility data of complexes 7 and 8 are shown as χ′MT versus T plots in Figures S13 and S14. For both complexes, χ′MT continuously decreases with decreasing temperature, indicating the existence of lowlying excites states. Extrapolation of the χ′MT signal to 0 K from T > ∼8 K gives a value of ∼3 cm3 K mol−1 in both complexes, indicative of a spin ground-state value ST = 2 (with g ≈ 2). Finally, as expected, on the basis of their small ST value, complexes 7 and 8 do not exhibit out-of-phase ac signals down to 1.8 K (Figures S13 and S14) and thus are not SMMs. It is noteworthy that the heterometallic MnIII4Gd2 complexes 1 and 5 display different ground-state spin values (1, ST = 5; 5, ST = 6) that are significantly larger than that of the homometallic complexes 7 and 8 (ST = 2). A possible explanation for the observed spin variability could come from the comparison of the crystal structures of the MnIII4Gd2 and MnIII4MnII2 complexes. All compounds comprise a {MnIII4(μ3O)2}8+ butterfly unit, which is linked either to two GdIII ions (in 1 and 5) or to two MnII ions (in 7 and 8), one at each side. The magnetic interactions between the GdIII ions (for 1 and 5) and the central MnIII4 structural unit are expected to be very weak; thus, the former could be considered as magnetically isolated GdIII ions contributing an S = 7 to the total spin of the compounds. The rationalization of the ST values of 1 (ST = 5) and 5 (ST = 6) requires that their {MnIII4(μ3-O)2}8+ units possess S = 2 and 1 ground states, respectively. Indeed, this could be the case, since compounds possessing the planar {MnIII4(μ3-O)2}8+ butterfly core are known to exhibit spin variability due to the presence of spin frustration effects. Thus, small changes in the relevant magnitude of the competing Jbb and Jwb interactions (Jbb and Jwb refer to the inner “body−body” and outer “wing tip−body” interactions, respectively, of the Mn4 butterfly), which could result, for example, from the presence of different bridging carboxylate ligands as happens in 1 (EtCO2) and 5 (MeCO2), can affect significantly their spin ground state, which, as a result, can vary from ST = 0 to ST = 8.37 Thus, the spin variability observed in the MnIII4Gd2 complexes is attributed to the presence of the planar {MnIII4(μ3-O)2}8+ unit in their structure, which is well-known to display various ST values due to spin frustration effects. In addition, the homometallic Mn6 compounds exhibit lower ground-state spin values (ST = 2) than the corresponding

Figure 5. In-phase ac susceptibility (χ′M) signal, plotted as χ′MT vs T (top), and out-of-phase (χ″M) signal plotted as χ″M vs T (bottom) for 4 in a 3.5 Oe field oscillating at the indicated frequencies.

frequencies. The values at high temperatures agree closely with the dc susceptibility data at the same temperature. The χ′MT decreases continuously with decreasing temperature up to ∼3 K as was also observed in the dc plot, suggesting the depopulation of excited states as temperature is lowered. Below 3 K a slight frequency-dependent drop is observed, which is combined with the presence of a tail in the out-of-phase ac plot (χ″M, Figure 5, 5664

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00191 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 5657−5668

Article

Inorganic Chemistry

synthesis of Mn and Mn/Ln clusters with (py)2CO combined with diol-type ligands are in progress and will be reported in due course.

Mn4Gd2 (ST = 5, 6) ones. This can be attributed to a number of reasons including (i) the higher spin contribution from Gd3+ than Mn2+, (ii) different metric parameters (bond lengths and angles) of the compounds due to the presence of MnII (in 7 and 8) instead of GdIII ions (in 1, 5) and (iii) stronger exchange interactions of the two terminal metal ions (MnII in 7, 8 and GdIII in 1, 5) with the MnIII4 planar butterfly, in the case of the homometallic complexes.

■

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

* Supporting Information S

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00191. Structural figures for 2−6 and 8, and magnetism plots (PDF) Crystallographic data for complexes 1−8 (CIF) Crystallographic data (CIF) Crystallographic data (CIF) Crystallographic data (CIF) Crystallographic data (CIF) Crystallographic data (CIF) Crystallographic data (CIF) Crystallographic data (CIF)

■

CONCLUSIONS The synthesis, structures, and magnetic properties of six heterometallic MnIII4Ln2 metal clusters (1−6) and their homometallic MnII2MnIII4 (7 and 8) structural analogues are discussed. The compounds bear the anionic gem-diolate form of di-2-pyridyl ketone as organic ligand, and most of the heterometallic ones (1−3, 5) were prepared from a reaction procedure that involves use of a combination of (py)2CO with aliphatic diols in Mn/4f carboxylate chemistry. Although the diols do not appear in the final product they play a crucial role in the isolation of the Mn4Ln2 compounds, since reactions in their absence did not result in the their formation. In fact this is the initial systematic investigation on the use of a combination of (py)2CO with diols for the isolation of new Mn-containing complexes. The reported compounds display an uncommon cross-shaped metal core,25 which appears for the first time in both the heterometallic 3d/4f metal cluster chemistry and in the coordination chemistry of (py)2CO. The isolation of a series of clusters possessing this uncommon cross-shaped core is unexpected, since it reveals its stability and the easiness of its formation something that is not in line with the literature findings. Similarly, the isolation of both the homometallic Mn6 and the heterometallic Mn4Ln2 analogues is rather surprising, especially if we take into account that these compounds display uncommon structural cores. The difficulty to isolate homometallic 3d and heterometallic 3d/4f complexes possessing related cores arises mainly from the larger coordination numbers of the 4f ions and also from the significant difference in the size of 3d and 4f metal ions. The dc and ac magnetic susceptibility measurements in representative compounds revealed the presence of dominant antiferromagnetic exchange interactions. The Mn4Gd2 compounds display spin ground-state values ST = 5 (1) and 6 (5), whereas the homometallic Mn6 analogues (7 and 8) show ST = 2. On the one hand, the spin variability in the case of the two heterometallic complexes was attributed to the presence of the planar {MnIII4(μ3-O)2}8+ butterfly unit in their structure, which is weakly coupled to the two GdIII ions and is well-known to display various ST values from 0 to 8 due to spin frustration. On the other hand, the Mn6 compounds display a significantly smaller ST value for a number of reasons discussed in the magnetism section, as expected, since they are different compounds. In addition, one of the Mn4Dy2 compounds (4· 0.7MeOH·0.8H2O) displays weak out-of-phase ac signals (χ″M) at low temperatures indicating that it might be a weak SMM. Thus, (py)2CO, after many years of intense research efforts that have yielded an impressive number of compounds bearing this ligand or its derivatives, remains a wellspring of new metal clusters with novel structural features and interesting magnetic properties. The combination of (py)2CO with diol-type ligands is demonstrated as a powerful synthetic method toward the isolation of new 3d and 3d/4f metal clusters that will definitely afford several new compounds both homometallic and heterometallic in the near future. Further studies toward the

■

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Corresponding Authors

*E-mail: [email protected]. (A.J.T.) *E-mail: [email protected]. (C.P.) ORCID

Constantina Papatriantafyllopoulou: 0000-0002-5652-7747 Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

■

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported by Univ. of Cyprus (UCY Internal Research Grant), the European Union Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) under Grant Nos. PCIG09-GA2011-293814 (A.J.T. and C.P.) and PIRSES-GA-2011-295190 (A.J.T., G.C., and M.S.). G.C. thanks the USA National Science Foundation for support (CHE-1565664).

■

REFERENCES

(1) (a) Rosado Piquer, L.; Sanudo, E. C. Heterometallic 3d−4f single-molecule magnets. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 8771−8780. (b) Liu, K.; Shi, W.; Cheng, P. Toward heterometallic single-molecule magnets: Synthetic strategy, structures and properties of 3d−4f discrete complexes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2015, 289−290, 74−122. (2) (a) Bagai, R.; Christou, G. The Drosophila of single-molecule magnetism: [Mn12O12(O2CR)16(H2O)4]. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1011−1026. and references cited therein. (b) Christou, G.; Gatteschi, D.; Hendrickson, D. N.; Sessoli, R. Single-Molecule Magnets. MRS Bull. 2000, 25, 66−71. (c) Gatteschi, D.; Sessoli, R. Quantum Tunneling of Magnetization and Related Phenomena in Molecular Materials. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 268−297. (d) Aromi, G.; Brechin, E. K. Synthesis of 3d Metallic Single-Molecule Magnets. Struct. Bonding (Berlin) 2006, 122, 1−69. (e) Milios, C. J.; Winpenny, R. E. P. Cluster-Based Single-Molecule Magnets. Struct. Bonding (Berlin, Ger.) 2014, 164, 1−109. (f) Qin, L.; Yu, Y.-Z.; Liao, P.-Q.; Xue, W.; Zheng, Z.; Chen, X.-M.; Zheng, Y.-Z. A “Molecular Water Pipe”: A Giant Tubular Cluster {Dy72} Exhibits Fast Proton Transport and Slow Magnetic Relaxation. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 10772−10779. (3) Bogani, L.; Wernsdorfer, W. Molecular spintronics using singlemolecule magnets. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 179−186. (4) (a) Hill, S.; Edwards, R. S.; Aliaga-Alcalde, N.; Christou, G. Quantum Coherence in an Exchange-Coupled Dimer of SingleMolecule Magnets. Science 2003, 302, 1015−1018. (b) Tiron, R.; Wernsdorfer, W.; Aliaga-Alcalde, N.; Christou, G. Quantum tunneling 5665

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00191 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 5657−5668

Article

Inorganic Chemistry

Dinuclear 3d-4f Single-Molecule Magnets. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 7268−7273. (d) Mondal, K. C.; Kostakis, G. E.; Lan, Y.; Wernsdorfer, W.; Anson, C. E.; Powell, A. K. Defect-Dicubane Ni2Ln2 (Ln = Dy, Tb) Single Molecule Magnets. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 11604−11611. (13) (a) Zhu, Q.; Xiang, S.; Sheng, T.; Yuan, D.; Shen, C.; Tan, C.; Hu, S.; Wu, X. A series of goblet-like heterometallic pentanuclear [LnIIICuII4] clusters featuring ferromagnetic coupling and singlemolecule magnet behavior. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 10736−10738. (b) Ghosh, S.; Ida, Y.; Ishida, T.; Ghosh, A. Linker StoichiometryControlled Stepwise Supramolecular Growth of a Flexible Cu2Tb Single Molecule Magnet from Monomer to Dimer to One-Dimensional Chain. Cryst. Growth Des. 2014, 14, 2588−2598. (c) Osa, S.; Kido, T.; Matsumoto, N.; Re, N.; Pochaba, A.; Mrozinski, J. A Tetranuclear 3d-4f Single Molecule Magnet: [CuIILTbIII(hfac)2]2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 420−421. (d) Baskar, V.; Gopal, K.; Helliwell, M.; Tuna, F.; Wernsdorfer, W.; Winpenny, R. E. P. 3d−4f Clusters with large spin ground states and SMM behaviour. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 4747−4750. (14) Papatriantafyllopoulou, C.; Wernsdorfer, W.; Abboud, K. A.; Christou, G. Mn21Dy Cluster with a Record Magnetization Reversal Barrier for a Mixed 3d/4f Single-Molecule Magnet. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 421−423. (15) Holynska, M.; Premuzic, D.; Jeon, I. − R.; Wernsdorfer, W.; Clérac, R.; Dehnen, S. [MnIII6 O3Ln2] Single-Molecule Magnets: Increasing the Energy Barrier Above 100 K. Chem. - Eur. J. 2011, 17, 9605−9610. (16) Stamatatos, T. C.; Teat, S. J.; Wernsdorfer, W.; Christou, G. Enhancing the Quantum Properties of Manganese−Lanthanide Single - Molecule Magnets: Observation of Quantum Tunneling Steps in the Hysteresis Loops of a {Mn12Gd} Cluster. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 521−524. (17) (a) Mereacre, V.; Ako, A. M.; Clerac, R.; Wernsdorfer, W.; Filoti, G.; Bartolome, J.; Anson, C. E.; Powell, A. K. A Bell-Shaped Mn11Gd2 Single-Molecule Magnet. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 9248−9249. (b) Mereacre, V.; Ako, A. M.; Clerac, R.; Wernsdorfer, W.; Hewitt, I. J.; Anson, C. E.; Powell, A. K. Heterometallic [Mn5-Ln4] Single-Molecule Magnets with High Anisotropy Barriers. Chem. - Eur. J. 2008, 14, 3577−3584. (c) Langley, S.; Moubaraki, B.; Murray, K. S. A heptadecanuclear MnIII9DyIII8 cluster derived from triethanolamine with two edge sharing supertetrahedra as the core and displaying SMM behaviour. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 5066−5069. (18) Vignesh, K. R.; Langley, S. K.; Moubaraki, B.; Murray, K. S.; Rajaraman, G. Large Hexadecametallic {MnIII−LnIII} Wheels: Synthesis, Structural, Magnetic, and Theoretical Characterization. Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 16364−16369. (19) (a) Warburg, E. Magnetische Untersuchungen. Ann. Phys. 1881, 249, 141. (b) Debye, P. Einige Bemerkungenzur zur Magnetisierung bei tiefer Temperatur. Ann. Phys. 1926, 386, 1154. (20) (a) Zhang, Z.-M.; Pan, L.-Y.; Lin, W.-Q.; Leng, J.-D.; Guo, F.-S.; Chen, Y.-C.; Liu, J.-L.; Tong, M.-L. Wheel-shaped nanoscale 3d−4f {CoII16LnIII24} clusters (Ln = Dy and Gd). Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 8081−8083. (b) Zheng, Y.-Z.; Evangelisti, M.; Winpenny, R. E. P. Co−Gd phosphonate complexes as magnetic refrigerants. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 99−102. (c) Zheng, Y.-Z.; Evangelisti, M.; Tuna, F.; Winpenny, R. E. P. Co−Ln Mixed-Metal Phosphonate Grids and Cages as Molecular Magnetic Refrigerants. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 1057−1065. (21) Leng, J.-D.; Liu, J.-L.; Tong, M.-L. Unique nanoscale {CuII36LnIII24} (Ln = Dy and Gd) metallo-rings. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 5286−5288. (22) (a) Peng, J.-B.; Zhang, Q.-C.; Kong, X.-J.; Ren, Y.-P.; Long, L.S.; Huang, R.-B.; Zheng, L.-S.; Zheng, Z. A 48-Metal Cluster Exhibiting a Large Magnetocaloric Effect. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 10649−10652. (b) Chen, W.-P.; Liao, P.-Q.; Yu, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Chen, X.-M.; Zheng, Y.-Z. A Mixed-Ligand Approach for a Gigantic and Hollow Heterometallic Cage {Ni64RE96} for Gas Separation and Magnetic Cooling Applications. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 9375−9379. (c) Zheng, Y.-Z.; Evangelisti, M.; Winpenny, R. E. P. Large Magnetocaloric Effect in a Wells−Dawson Type {Ni6Gd6P6}

in a three-dimensional network of exchange-coupled single-molecule magnets. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2003, 68, 140407. (5) (a) Kovalev, A. A.; Hayden, L. X.; Bauer, G. E. W.; Tserkovnyak, Y. Macrospin Tunneling and Magnetopolaritons with Nanomechanical Interference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106, 147203. (b) Garanin, D. A.; Chudnovsky, E. M. Quantum entanglement of a tunneling spin with mechanical modes of a torsional resonator. Phys. Rev. X 2011, 1, 011005. (c) Ganzhorn, M.; Klyatskaya, S.; Ruben, M.; Wernsdorfer, W. Strong spin−phonon coupling between a single-molecule magnet and a carbon nanotube nanoelectromechanical system. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 165−169. (6) (a) Wernsdorfer, W.; Bhaduri, S.; Boskovic, C.; Christou, G.; Hendrickson, D. N. Spin-parity dependent tunneling of magnetization in single-molecule magnets. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2002, 65, 180403. (b) Wernsdorfer, W.; Chakov, N. E.; Christou, G. Quantum Phase Interference and Spin-Parity in Mn12 Single-Molecule Magnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95, 037203. (7) (a) del Barco, E.; Kent, A. D.; Hill, S.; North, J. M.; Dalal, N. S.; Rumberger, E. M.; Hendrickson, D. N.; Chakov, N. E.; Christou, G. Magnetic Quantum Tunneling in the Single-Molecule Magnet Mn12Acetate. J. Low Temp. Phys. 2005, 140, 119−197. (b) Stamp, P. C. E. Tunnelling secrets extracted. Nature 1996, 383, 125−127. (8) (a) Wernsdorfer, W.; Sessoli, R. Quantum Phase Interference and Parity Effects in Magnetic Molecular Clusters. Science 1999, 284, 133− 135. (b) Wernsdorfer, W.; Soler, M.; Christou, G.; Hendrickson, D. N. Quantum phase interference (Berry phase) in single-molecule magnets of [Mn12]2‑. J. Appl. Phys. 2002, 91, 7164−7166. (9) (a) Macia, F.; Hernandez, J. M.; Tejada, J.; Datta, S.; Hill, S.; Lampropoulos, C.; Christou, G. Effects of quantum mechanics on the deflagration threshold in the molecular magnet Mn12 acetate. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2009, 79, 092403. (b) Adams, S. T.; da Silva Neto, E. H.; Datta, S.; Ware, J. F.; Lampropoulos, C.; Christou, G.; Myaesoedov, Y.; Zeldov, E.; Friedman, J. R. Geometric-Phase Interference in a Mn12 Single-Molecule Magnet with Fourfold Rotational Symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 110, 087205. (10) (a) Baniodeh, A.; Liang, Y.; Anson, C. E.; Magnani, N.; Powell, A. K.; Unterreiner, A. N.; Seyfferle, S.; Slota, M.; Dressel, M.; Bogani, L.; Goß, K. Unraveling the Influence of Lanthanide Ions on Intra- and Inter-Molecular Electronic Processes in Fe10Ln10 Nano-Toruses. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 6280−6290. (b) Badia-Romano, L.; Bartolomé, F.; Bartolomé, J.; Luzón, J.; Prodius, D.; Turta, C.; Mereacre, V.; Wilhelm, F.; Rogalev, A. Field-induced internal Fe and Ln spin reorientation in butterfly {Fe3LnO2} (Ln = Dy and Gd) singlemolecule magnets. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2013, 87, 184403. (c) Schmidt, S.; Prodius, D.; Mereacre, V.; Kostakis, G. E.; Powell, A. K. Unprecedented chemical transformation: crystallographic evidence for 1,1,2,2-tetrahydroxyethane captured within an Fe6Dy3 single molecule magnet. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 1696−1698. (11) (a) Chandrasekhar, V.; Pandian, B. M.; Azhakar, R.; Vittal, J. J.; Clérac, R. Linear Trinuclear Mixed-Metal CoII−GdIII−CoII SingleMolecule Magnet: [L2Co2Gd][NO3]·2CHCl3 (LH3 = (S)P[N(Me)N = CH−C6H3-2-OH-3-OMe]3. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 5140−5142. (b) Peng, J. − B.; Zhang, Q. − C.; Kong, X. − J.; Zheng, Y. − Z.; Ren, Y. − P.; Long, L. − S.; Huang, R. − B.; Zheng, L. − S.; Zheng, Z. High-Nuclearity 3d−4f Clusters as Enhanced Magnetic Coolers and Molecular Magnets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 3314−3317. (c) Ungur, L.; Thewissen, M.; Costes, J.-P.; Wernsdorfer, W.; Chibotaru, L. F. Interplay of Strongly Anisotropic Metal Ions in Magnetic Blocking of Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 6328−6337. (12) (a) Efthymiou, C. G.; Stamatatos, T. C.; Papatriantafyllopoulou, C.; Tasiopoulos, A. J.; Wernsdorfer, W.; Perlepes, S. P.; Christou, G. Nickel/Lanthanide Single-Molecule Magnets: {Ni3Ln} “Stars” with a Ligand Derived from the Metal-Promoted Reduction of Di-2-pyridyl Ketone under Solvothermal Conditions. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 9737− 9739. (b) Pasatoiu, T. D.; Etienne, M.; Madalan, A. M.; Andruh, M.; Sessoli, R. Dimers and chains of {3d−4f} single molecule magnets constructed from heterobimetallic tectons. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 4802−4808. (c) Colacio, E.; Ruiz-Sanchez, J.; White, F. J.; Brechin, E. K. Strategy for the Rational Design of Asymmetric Triply Bridged 5666

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00191 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 5657−5668

Article

Inorganic Chemistry

0.5MeCN. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5703−5711. (b) Lis, T. Manganese (II) Propionate Dihydrate. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Crystallogr. Cryst. Chem. 1977, B33, 2964−2966. (28) Oxford Diffraction. CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED, version 1.171.32.15; Oxford Diffraction Ltd: Abingdon, England, 2008. (29) (a) Altomare, A.; Cascarano, G.; Giacovazzo, C.; Guagliardi, A.; Burla, M. C.; Polidori, G.; Camalli, M. SIR92: a program for automatic solution of crystal structures by direct methods. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1994, 27, 435−435. (b) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXL97; University of Göttingen, Germany. (c) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXL-2014/7, Program for Refinement of Crystal Structures; University of Göttingen: Germany, 2014. (d) Farrugia, L. J. WinGX suite for small-molecule single-crystal crystallography. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1999, 32, 837−838. (30) (a) Brandenburg, K., DIAMOND, Version 3.1d; Crystal Impact GbR: Bonn, Germany, 2006. (b) Macrae, C. F.; Edgington, P. R.; McCabe, P.; Pidcock, E.; Shields, G. P.; Taylor, R.; Towler, M.; Van de Streek, J. Mercury: visualization and analysis of crystal structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2006, 39, 453−457. (31) Van der Sluis, P.; Spek, A. L. BYPASS: an Effective Method for the Refinement of Crystal Structures Containing Disordered Solvent Regions. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A: Found. Crystallogr. 1990, A46, 194− 201. (32) (a) Liu, W.; Thorp, H. H. Bond Valence Sum Analysis of MetalLigand Bond Lengths in Metalloenzymes and Model Complexes. 2. Refined Distances and Other Enzymes. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 4102− 4105. (b) Brown, I. D.; Altermatt, D. Bond-Valence Parameters Obtained from a Systematic Analysis of the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci. 1985, 41, 244−247. (33) Ruiz-Martinez, A.; Casanova, D.; Alvarez, S. Polyhedral Structures with an Odd Number of Vertices: Nine-Coordinate Metal Compounds. Chem. - Eur. J. 2008, 14, 1291−1303. (34) Llunell, M.; Casanova, D.; Girera, J.; Alemany, P.; Alvarez, S. SHAPE, version 2.0; University of Barcelona: Barcelona, Spain, 2010. (35) (a) Liu, S. J.; Xie, X. R.; Zheng, T.-F.; Bao, J.; Liao, J.-S.; Chen, J.-L.; Wen, H.-R. Three-dimensional two-fold interpenetrated CrIII− GdIII heterometallic framework as an attractive cryogenic magnetorefrigerant. CrystEngComm 2015, 17, 7270−7275. (b) Gómez, V.; Vendier, L.; Corbella, M.; Costes, J.-P. Antiferromagnetic Co−Gd Interactions in a Tetranuclear [CoGd]2 Complex with Low-Spin Square-Planar Co Ions − Role of the Singly Occupied 3d Co Magnetic Orbital. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 2011, 2653−2656. (c) Gómez, V.; Vendier, L.; Corbella, M.; Costes, J.-P. Tetranuclear [Co−Gd]2 Complexes: Aiming at a Better Understanding of the 3d-Gd Magnetic Interaction. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 51, 6396−6404. (36) (a) Charalambous, M.; Moushi, E. E.; Papatriantafyllopoulou, C.; Wernsdorfer, W.; Nastopoulos, V.; Christou, G.; Tasiopoulos, A. J. A Mn36Ni4 ‘loop-of-loops-and-supertetrahedra’ aggregate possessing a high ST = 26 ± 1 spin ground state. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 5410− 55412. (b) Charalambous, M.; Zartilas, S. M.; Moushi, E. E.; Papatriantafyllopoulou, C.; Manos, M. J.; Stamatatos, T. C.; Mukherjee, S.; Nastopoulos, V.; Christou, G.; Tasiopoulos, A. J. Discrete and encapsulated molecular grids: homometallic Mn15 and heterometallic Mn24Ni2 aggregates. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 9090− 9093. (37) (a) Sanudo, E. C.; Cauchy, T.; Ruiz, E.; Laye, R. H.; Roubeau, O.; Teat, S. J.; Aromi, G. Molecules Composed of Two Weakly Magnetically Coupled [MnIII4] Clusters. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 9045− 9047. (b) Canada-Vilalta, C.; Huffman, J. C.; Christou, G. Preparation, crystal structure and chelate substitution reactions of [Mn4O2(O2CPh)6(dpm)2] (dpm = the anion of dipivaloylmethane). Polyhedron 2001, 20, 1785−1793. (c) Elshaarawy, R. F. M.; Lan, Y.; Janiak, C. Oligonuclear homo- and mixed-valence manganese complexes based on thiophene- or aryl-carboxylate ligation: Synthesis, characterization and magnetic studies. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2013, 401, 85−94. (d) Taguchi, T.; Daniels, M. R.; Abboud, K. A.; Christou, G. Mn4, Mn6, and Mn11 Clusters from the Use of Bulky Diphenyl(pyridine-2-yl)methanol. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 9325−9335. (e) Bagai, R.; Abboud, K. A.; Christou, G. Ligand-induced distortion of a tetranuclear manganese butterfly complex. Dalton Trans. 2006,

Cage. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 3692−3695. (d) Zheng, Y.-Z.; Pineda, E. M.; Helliwell, M.; Winpenny, R. E. P. MnII−GdIII Phosphonate Cages with a Large Magnetocaloric Effect. Chem. - Eur. J. 2012, 18, 4161−4165. (e) Zhou, G.-J.; Richter, J.; Schnack, J.; Zheng, Y.-Z. Hydrophobicity-Driven Self-Assembly of an EighteenMembered Honeycomb Lattice with Almost Classical Spins. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 14846−14850. (23) (a) Papatriantafyllopoulou, C.; Abboud, K. A.; Christou, G. Carboxylate-Free MnIII2LnIII2 (Ln = Lanthanide) and MnIII2YIII2 Complexes from the Use of (2-Hydroxymethyl)pyridine: Analysis of Spin Frustration Effects. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 8959−8966. (b) Mukherjee, S.; Daniels, M. R.; Bagai, R.; Abboud, K. A.; Christou, G.; Lampropoulos, C. A variety of new tri- and tetranuclear Mn−Ln and Fe−Ln (Ln = lanthanide) complexes. Polyhedron 2010, 29, 54−65. (c) Savva, M.; Papatriantafyllopoulou, C.; Viskadourakis, Z.; Giapintzakis, J.; Tasiopoulos, A. J. MnIII2LnIII2 (Ln = Gd, Dy, Ho) Complexes From The Initial Employment of 1,3-Propanediol In Mixed 3d/4f Metal Cluster Chemistry. Curr. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 3, 86− 93. (d) Efthymiou, C. G.; Georgopoulou, A. N.; Papatriantafyllopoulou, C.; Terzis, A.; Raptopoulou, C. P.; Escuer, A.; Perlepes, S. P. Initial employment of di-2-pyridyl ketone as a route to nickel(II)/lanthanide(III) clusters: triangular Ni2Ln complexes. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 8603−8605. (e) Lampropoulos, C.; Stamatatos, T. C.; Abboud, K. A.; Christou, G. Initial Use of Dioximate Ligands in 3d/4f Cluster Chemistry: Synthesis, Structure, and Magnetic Studies of an Unusual [GdIII2MnIVO]8+ Complex. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 429−431. (f) Georgopoulou, A. N.; Adam, R.; Raptopoulou, C. P.; Psycharis, V.; Ballesteros, R.; Abarca, B.; Boudalis, A. K. Expanding the 3d-4f heterometallic chemistry of the (py)2CO and pyCOpyCOpy ligands: structural, magnetic and Mössbauer spectroscopic studies of two FeII−GdIII complexes. Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 8199−8205. (g) Blacque, O.; Amjad, A.; Caneschi, A.; Sorace, L.; Car, P.-E. Synthesis, structure, magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of a series of {CrIII4LnIII} complexes. New J. Chem. 2016, 40, 3571−3577. (24) Roubeau, O.; Clérac, R. Rational Assembly of High-Spin Polynuclear Magnetic Complexes into Coordination Networks: the Case of a [Mn4] Single-Molecule Magnet Building Block. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 2008, 4325−4342. (25) (a) Bhula, R.; Collier, S.; Robinson, W. T.; Weatherburn, D. C. Complexes of the Ligand 1,5,8,12-Tetraazadodecane(3,2,3-tet) with Manganese(III) and with a Valence-Trapped Manganese(III)/ Manganese(IV) Hexanuclear Array. Crystal and Molecular Structures of [trans-Mn(3-IOBz) 2 (3,2,3-tet)](ClO 4 ) and [Mn 6 (3,2,3tet)4O6(OAC)3]I5·2H2O·4C4H8O. Inorg. Chem. 1990, 29, 4027− 4032. (b) Perlepe, P. S.; Cunha-Silva, L.; Bekiari, V.; Gagnon, K. J.; Teat, S. J.; Escuer, A.; Stamatatos, T. C. Structural diversity in NiII cluster chemistry: Ni5, Ni6, and {NiNa2}n complexes bearing the Schiff-base ligand N-naphthalidene-2-amino- 5-chlorobenzoic acid. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 10256−10270. (26) (a) Stamatatos, T. C.; Efthymiou, C. G.; Stoumpos, C. C.; Perlepes, S. P. Adventures in the Coordination Chemistry of Di-2pyridyl Ketone and Related Ligands: From High-Spin Molecules and Single-Molecule Magnets to Coordination Polymers, and from Structural Aesthetics to an Exciting New Reactivity Chemistry of Coordinated Ligands. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 2009, 3361−3391. (b) Papaefstathiou, G. S.; Perlepes, S. P. Families of Polynuclear Manganese, Cobalt, Nickel and Copper Complexes Stabilized by Various Forms of Di-2-pyridyl Ketone. Comments Inorg. Chem. 2002, 23, 249−274. (c) Wang, H.-S.; Yang, F.-J.; Long, Q.-Q.; Huang, Z.-Y.; Chen, W.; Pan, Z.-Q.; Song, Y. Two unprecedented decanuclear heterometallic [MnIIMnIIILnIII] (Ln = Dy, Tb) complexes displaying relaxation of magnetization. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 18221−18228. (27) (a) Vincent, J. B.; Chang, H. R.; Folting, K.; Huffman, J. C.; Christou, G.; Hendrickson, D. N. Preparation and Physical Properties of Trinuclear Oxo-Centered Manganese Complexes of the General Formulation [Mn3O(O2CR)6L3]0,+ (R = Me or Ph; L = a Neutral Donor Group) and the Crystal Structures of [Mn 3 O(O 2 CMe) 6 (pyr) 3 ](pyr) and [Mn 3 O(O 2 CPh) 6 (pyr) 2 (H 2 O)]· 5667

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00191 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 5657−5668

Article

Inorganic Chemistry 3306−3312. (f) McLellan, R.; Palacios, M. A.; Brechin, E. K.; Dalgarno, S. J. Influencing the Orientation of Jahn−Teller Axes in Butterfly-Like MnIII4 Clusters. ChemPlusChem 2014, 79, 667−670.

5668

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00191 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 5657−5668