High Throughput Biodegradation-Screening Test To Prioritize and

Subscriber access provided by CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY

Article

A high-throughput biodegradation-screening test to prioritise and evaluate chemical biodegradability Timothy James Martin, Andrew Kenneth Goodhead, Kishor Acharya, Ian M Head, Jason R. Snape, and Russell J Davenport Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • Publication Date (Web): 09 May 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 12, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 28

Environmental Science & Technology

1

A high-throughput biodegradation-screening test to

2

prioritise and evaluate chemical biodegradability

3

Timothy J. Martin† •, Andrew K. Goodhead†

4

Snape‡∆, Russell J. Davenport*†

5

†

6

Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom.

7

‡

8

∆

9

*[email protected]; Telephone: +44 (0) 191 208 5544; Fax: +44 (0) 191 208 6502

• ◊

, Kishor Acharya†, Ian M. Head†, Jason R.

School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Cassie Building, Newcastle University,

AstraZeneca, Mereside, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK10 4TG, United Kingdom. School of Life Sciences, Gibbet Hill Campus, The University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL.

10

KEYWORDS Biodegradation; Persistence; PBT; Environmental Risk Assessment

11

ABSTRACT

12

Comprehensive assessment of environmental biodegradability of pollutants is limited by the use

13

of low-throughput systems.

14

Cooperation and Development (OECD) Ready Biodegradability Tests (RBTs), where one

15

sample from an environment may be used to assess a chemical’s ability to readily biodegrade or

16

persist universally in that environment. This neglects the considerable inherent microbial

17

variation spatially and temporally in any environment.

These are epitomized by the Organisation for Economic

Inaccurate designations of

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

1


Page 2 of 28

18

biodegradability or persistence can occur as a result. RBTs are central in assessing

19

biodegradation fate of chemicals and inferring exposure concentrations in environmental risk

20

assessments. We developed a colorimetric assay for the reliable quantification of suitable

21

aromatic compounds in a high throughput biodegradation screening test (HT-BST). The HT-BST

22

accurately differentiated and prioritised a range of structurally diverse aromatic compounds

23

based on their assigned relative biodegradabilities and Quantitative Structure-Activity

24

Relationship (QSAR) model outputs. Approximately 20,000 individual biodegradation tests were

25

performed, returning analogous results to conventional RBTs. The effect of substituent group

26

structure and position on biodegradation potential demonstrated a significant correlation

27

(P methyl (CH3)= chloro (Cl) > methoxy (CH3O)= fluoro (F ) > nitro (NO2) >

282

bromo (Br) for MPN data, which was similar to COOH > OH > CH3 > CH3O > Cl > NO2 > Br >

283

F for Biowin2 data, where COOH has the highest potential.

284

Regression analysis of the biodegradation potential (expressed as MPN counts) showed a weak

285

but significant correlation with the substituent Hammett constant (R2 = 0.19, P < 0.05). When

286

broken down into the different positions, there was a significant negative correlation (R2 = 0.58,

287

P < 0.05) between the biodegradation potential and the Hammett constant for the substituent


13


Page 14 of 28

288

groups in position 3 (meta-position) on the ring (Figure 3). There was no significant correlation

289

for positions 2 and 4 unlike those determined in previous studies for specific biodegradation rate

290

30, 32

.

291 292

DISCUSSION

293

Proof of principle for HT-BSTs. The HT-BST described here, using a single activated sludge

294

source of inoculum, has been shown to correctly prioritise a group of structurally diverse

295

aromatic chemicals based on their previous biodegradability classification using conventional

296

RBT test criteria (i.e. ability to aerobically biodegrade in an aqueous medium). The HT-BST also

297

allowed us to investigate the effect of substituent group on biodegradability of the twenty-five

298

mono-substituted phenols, which compared well to biodegradability from QSAR estimates and

299

other experimental studies.

300

The HT-BST has high throughput and replication. We typically used a 96-well plate per dilution

301

of inoculum per chemical, resulting in approximately 20,000 individual biodegradation-

302

screening tests during the course of this research at a fraction of the cost and time of a standard

303

RBT (Table S5 SI), in addition to addressing the labour and time restrictions associated with

304

conventional analyses33. This method is amenable to automation using liquid handling robots,

305

unlike existing RBTs, which may further streamline the process. The format described in the

306

present study could also be adapted to include multiple chemicals, multiple inocula

307

concentrations, and/or multiple inocula from the same or different environmental sources on one

308

plate; indeed during the standard curve production each column (i.e. 8 wells) represented a

309

different chemical concentration. It opens up the possibility of explicitly investigating the


14

Page 15 of 28


310

variability of chemical biodegradation both spatially and temporally in relation to differences in

311

microbial communities. The colorimetric detection of specific chemicals was accurate and

312

reproducible; concentrations were statistically indistinguishable from those quantified by HPLC

313

in HT-BSTs showing primary degradation, the method had a low median coefficient of variation,

314

and the method detection limits were suitable for the current end-point thresholds used for RBTs.

315

At environmentally relevant inoculum concentrations, the assay effectively screened for potential

316

environmental persistence, correctly characterizing eight out of the ten selected chemicals, based

317

on their biodegradation potential. False negatives were more frequently observed at low

318

inoculum concentrations. It should be noted that the total number of bacteria present in typical

319

standard OECD RBTs (A-C, F) might sometimes reach the total number present at the highest

320

concentrations used in the HT-BST (~108) even though the concentrations may be different. This

321

is due to the test volumes used (up to L in RBTs, hundreds of µL in HT-BST). However, the

322

ratio of chemical to inoculum concentration, i.e. the food to microorganism ratio, was the same

323

in the HT-BST as those used in OECD RBTs for the range of OECD inocula concentrations

324

used. We have further shown previously that the variation in biodegradation at these lower

325

concentrations is extremely high, which in RBTs is further exacerbated by a drastic reduction in

326

the bacterial diversity of inocula preparation compared to the original activated sludge samples10.

327

Other recent studies have also investigated high-throughput miniaturized biodegradation tests

328

based on measuring oxygen uptake as a proxy for ultimate biodegradation of two readily and one

329

inherently biodegradable chemical 17. These tests report similar limits of detection and substrate

330

concentration ranges as those reported here. Unlike the current HT-BST, those based on oxygen

331

uptake appear to scale differently to conventional RBTs; the biodegradation end-point achieved

332

the same values but in a different amount of time, which may complicate cross-validation. The


15


Page 16 of 28

333

current HT-BST gave analogous results to conventional RBTs within the same timeframe,

334

although it measured primary biodegradation after a particular time and not over time. Using

335

plates that were sacrificially sampled at different time points would rectify this. Nevertheless,

336

both high-throughput methods would complement each other at a cost comparable to current

337

RBTs, thereby offering the opportunity to measure both primary and ultimate biodegradation in

338

the same test. The assessment of primary biodegradation, as described in the present study, does

339

not consider the potential formation of dead end by-products, which may or may not be toxic.

340

The HT-BST described is a relatively simple screening test and must be considered as a tool in a

341

broader intelligent testing strategy, as is current practice in REACH9,

342

potential formation of dead-end by-products, the assay could be coupled with analytical

343

chemistry, or the biodegradation of a rapidly degradable compound after the end of a study could

344

be performed as a toxicity assessment.

345

Regulatory implications. The prioritisation of chemicals based on hazards including

346

persistency, bioaccumulation and toxicity (collectively termed PBT)6 has been advocated since

347

the introduction of REACH in 2007. Of these, persistence/ biodegradation represents one of the

348

greatest uncertainties and most sensitive parameters in chemical exposure models 35. Persistence

349

is also a critical parameter in risk assessment: half-life combined with Kd are the two driving

350

factors governing predicted environmental concentrations (PECs) in various media. There has

351

been a significant drive towards increasing throughput and improving the reliability of

352

bioaccumulation and toxicity tests

353

required tests, as part of the replacement, reduction and refinement (3Rs) framework for humane

354

animal research

355

environment has received comparatively little attention, despite the need for it being highlighted

15

16

10, 13, 34

. To assess the

, with a view to ultimately reducing the overall number of

. Developing methods to effectively prioritize chemical persistence in the


16

Page 17 of 28


356

in REACH documentation 5. Persistence is probably the cheapest and most straightforward of the

357

hazards to characterise. Guidance recommends that chemicals should undergo persistence

358

assessments before bioaccumulation and toxicity assessments to avoid unnecessary animal tests,

359

and that the latter should be conducted following a chemical being assigned as potentially

360

persistent, dependent upon the chemical’s properties36. However, it has been estimated that of the

361

many chemicals which fail RBTs, up to 80% may be false negatives

362

unnecessary bioaccumulation and toxicity tests.

363

assessment would save upwards of 600 fish (Table S6 SI), and approximately $75K for every

364

chemical reliably screened out earlier in the testing process37. At the current rate of failure, this

365

equates to savings in the order of millions of fish and hundreds of millions of dollars.

366

Such tests could also help fulfill the criteria espoused for green chemistry i.e. process

367

optimisation and informed design to minimise exposure of the environment to hazardous

368

substances 38. The accurate characterisation of chemicals liable to persist in the environment at

369

an early stage of development has two benefits: (i) a cost-benefit opportunity to remove those

370

chemicals which are unlikely to receive regulatory acceptance at an earlier stage of product

371

development and (ii) prioritization of those chemicals which are designed to have a degree of

372

persistence in order to perform effectively (e.g. certain pharmaceuticals which need to remain

373

stable until they reach their intended point of action) for more intensive testing to determine their

374

overall risk to the environment.

375

Biodegradability and structure analysis. High throughput biodegradation tests may also enable

376

the generation of extensive and reliable biodegradation half-life data that could be used to

377

develop and validate in silico QSARs 39, 40. The use of QSAR methods in a regulatory capacity is

378

at present fundamentally undermined by a lack of reliable and robust experimental data. We used

12

, thereby resulting in

We estimate that accurate persistence


17


Page 18 of 28

379

the assay to demonstrate that there was a strong and statistically significant correlation with

380

Hammett’s constant for substituents on position 3 (meta) of the phenol, indicating that

381

biodegradability of phenols is influenced by the electrophilicity of the substituent group at this

382

position. There was a similar but weaker relationship of the substituents on positions 2 (ortho)

383

and 4 (para). This indicates that electronic effects on the 3 position are more pronounced than

384

the 2 and 4 position, which are adjacent and opposite to the C1 hydroxyl group. It is interesting

385

to note that for selected compounds, those with greater Gibbs free energy changes for rate

386

controlling reactions had higher probabilities of degradation (4-HBA, phenol, 4-nitrophenol and

387

4-chlorophenol; -251.97, -246.11, -245.61 and -207.39 kCal/mol respectively). There was thus a

388

general trend for increased biodegradability as the electrophilicity of the substituted group

389

decreased. The rank order of the effect of substituent groups agrees noticeably with previous

390

work by Pitter et al. who showed a correlation between the Hammett constant and specific rates

391

of degradation for phenolic compounds 30. Therefore, although the HT-BST is an end point, not a

392

rate assay, it can be used as a good indicator of relative biodegradability.

393

Future applications. The following limitations of the assay warrant further investigation: (i) the

394

assay is only applicable to chemicals which can react with 4-NBTFB, although there are

395

potential alternative colorimetric assays (e.g.25) which would benefit from further investigation;

396

(ii) degradation products may interact with 4-NBTFB to form an azo-dye which may result in a

397

false-negative assessment (although there was no evidence that this occurred); and (iii) the limit

398

of detection is suitable for current standard OECD test concentrations and pass thresholds (i.e.

399

the test has the capacity to resolve 70% degradation given a starting chemical concentration of

400

10 mg C L-1), however, it may not be sufficiently sensitive for investigations into

401

environmentally relevant chemical concentrations in the ng to µg L-1 range41. The assay is


18

Page 19 of 28


402

intended as an alternative to existing screening tests and is thus also limited by some of the

403

general constraints of standard OECD RBTs. For example, this assay would not be suitable for

404

volatile compounds or those with high log Kow and, in its current format, would not be suitable

405

for accounting for co-metabolic processes. Modifications to existing screening studies proposed

406

within REACH can also be applied to HT-BSTs to address some of these issues, however some

407

compounds would still be problematic, as they are for existing screening studies. Similarly,

408

potential inferences such as high DOC levels potentially impact OECD RBTs. There is a range

409

of options currently prescribed within the guidelines to circumvent these issues, such as ageing

410

the inocula, or washing to reduce background DOC levels1. The efficacy of these options could

411

also be assessed for the HT-BST described. Modifications to the assay may allow the assessment

412

of biodegradation under a range of different testing conditions, including the assessment of

413

anaerobic biodegradability.

414

Overall the HT-BST proposed here promises to be useful tool in the prioritization of persistent

415

chemicals and for investigating the rules that govern the biodegradation rates of chemicals

416

towards establishing reliable in silico methods of prioritization.

417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431

ASSOCIATED CONTENT Supporting information. Plot of absorbance against chemical concentration for chemicals used to evaluate the 4-NBTFB colorimetric assay. RBT data for 4-nitrophenol and 4-flurophenol. Chemical structures and properties. Chemical persistence classification sources and summary. Table of coefficients of variation for replicate absorbance measurements for chemicals used to evaluate the 4-NBTFB colorimetric assay. A relative cost comparison between HT-BST and RBT. Estimated fish requirements for B and T assessments. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org. AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding Author * Russell J. Davenport, School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Cassie Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom: [email protected]


19


432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477

Page 20 of 28

Present Addresses ◊ Andrew K. Goodhead is presently affiliated with Promega Corporation, Southampton, UK. Author Contributions These authors contributed equally. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

•

Funding Sources Funding for this work was received from EPSRC (including a Challenging Engineering award, EP/I025782/1), RCUK (EP500501/1), BBSRC (BB/H530897/1) and AstraZeneca Global SHE Research Programme. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This work represents an AstraZeneca Global Environment contribution to the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) under grant agreement no. 115735 – iPiE: Intelligent led assessment of Pharmaceuticals in the Environment. ABBREVIATIONS 1-A-2-N-4 SA, 1-amino-2-naphthalene-4-sulphonic acid; 2-A-1-NSA, 2-amino-1-naphthalene sulfonic acid; 2-N, 2-naphthol; 3-R’s, replacement, reduction and refinement framework; 4-A-5H, 2, 7-NSA, 4-amino-5-hydroxy-2, 7-naphthalene sulfonic acid; 4-CP, 4-chlorophenol; 4-HBA, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid; 4-HQ, 4-hydroquinone; 4-NBTFB, 4-nitrobenzenediazonium tetrafluoroborate; 4-NP, 4-nitrophenol; AS, activated sludge; BSA, benzene sulphinic acid; BST, biodegradation screening test; DOC, dissolved organic carbon; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; HT-BST, high throughput biodegradation screening test; MPN, most probable number; MS, mass spectrometry; OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; P, phenol; PBT, persistent, bioaccumulatory and toxic; Pexp, experimentally derived probability of biodegradation; PQSAR, QSAR derived probability of biodegradation; QSAR, quantitative structure-activity relationship; RBT, ready biodegradability test; REACH, registration, evaluation, authorization and restriction of chemicals; vPvB, very persistent and very bioaccumulative REFERENCES 1. OECD, Guidelines for the testing of chemicals, section 3, degradation and accumulation. Test No. 301: Ready Biodegradability. 1992. 2. Vazquez-Rodriguez, G.; Goma, G.; Rols, J. L., Toward a standardization of the microbial inoculum for ready biodegradability testing of chemicals. Water Sci. Technol. 2000, 42, (5-6), 43-46. 3. Geiss, F.; Del Bino, G.; Belech, G.; Norager, O.; Orthmann, E.; Mosselmans, G.; Powell, J.; Roy, R.; Smyrniotis, T.; Town, W. G., The EINECS inventory of existing chemical substances on the EC market. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 1992, 37, (1-2), 21-33. 4. Binetti, R.; Costamanga, F. M.; Marcello, I., Exponential growth of new chemicals and evolution of information relevant to risk control. Ann. Ist. Super. Sanita 2008, 44, (1), 13-15. 5. ECHA, Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.11: PBT assessment. Version 2.0. 2014. 6. ECHA REACH. http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/regulations/reach (27/10/2013),


20

Page 21 of 28

478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523


7. Nyholm, N.; Lindgaard-Jørgensen, P.; Hansen, N., Biodegradation of 4-nitrophenol in standardized aquatic degradation tests. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 1984, 8, (5), 451-470. 8. Painter, H. A. Detailed review paper on biodegradability testing: Environment monograph No. 98; OECD: Paris, 1995. 9. Martin, T. J.; Snape, J. R.; Bartram, A.; Robson, A.; Acharya, K.; Davenport, R. J., Environmentally relevant inocula concentrations improve the reliability of persistent assessments in biodegradation screening tests. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, (5), 3065-3073. 10. Goodhead, A. K.; Head, I. M.; Snape, J. R.; Davenport, R. J., Standard inocula preparations reduce the bacterial diversity and reliability of regulatory biodegradation tests. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2013, 21, (16), 9511-9521. 11. Kowalczyk, A.; Martin, T. J.; Price, O. R.; Snape, J. R.; van Egmond, R. A.; Finnegan, C. J.; Schäfer, H.; Davenport, R. J.; Bending, G. D., Refinement of biodegradation tests methodologies and the proposed utility of new microbial ecology techniques. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 111, (0), 9-22. 12. ECETOC, Workshop on biodegradation and persistence. Workshop Report No. 10. 2007. 13. ECHA, Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.7b: Endpoint specific guidance. 2012. 14. Hartung, T.; Rovida, C., Chemical regulators have overreached. Nature 2009, 460, (7259), 1080-1081. 15. NC3Rs National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research. http://www.nc3rs.org.uk/the-3rs (16/12/2015), 16. Gray, G. M.; Cohen, J. T., Policy: Rethink chemical risk assessments. Nature 2012, 489, (7414), 27-28. 17. Cregut, M.; Jouanneau, S.; Brillet, F.; Durand, M. J.; Sweetlove, C.; Cheneble, J. C.; L'Haridon, J.; Thouand, G., High throughput and miniaturised systems for biodegradability assessments. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2014, 21, (16), 9545-9552. 18. Thouand, G.; Capdeville, B.; Block, J. C., Preadapted Inocula for Limiting the Risk of Errors in Biodegradability Tests. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 1996, 33, (3), 261-267. 19. Thouand, G.; Durand, M. J.; Maul, A.; Gancet, C.; Blok, H., New Concepts in the Evaluation of Biodegradation/Persistence of Chemical Substances using a Microbial Inoculum. Front. Microbiol. 2011, 2. 20. APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water & Wastewater. American Public Health Association: 2005. 21. Zollinger, H., Diazo Chemistry, Vol. 1, Aromatic and Heteroaromatic Compounds. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. : 1994; Vol. 1. 22. Chapman, R. A.; Moy, P.; Henning, K., A Simple Test for Adaptation of SoilMicroorganisms to the Degradation of the Insecticide Carbofuran. J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part B 1985, (20), 313-319. 23. E.U., Directive 2013/39/EU of the European Pariament and of the Council of 12 August 2013 amending Directives 2000/60/EC and 2008/105/EC as regards priority substances in the field of water policy: L226. Official Journal of the European Union 2013. 24. USEPA, 40 CFR Part 423, Appendix A. In Code of Federal Regulations, 2014. 25. Walker, A., Enhanced degradation of iprodione and vinclozolin in soil: A simple colorimetric test for identification of rapid-degrading soils. Pestic. Sci. 1987, 21, (3), 233-240. 26. USEPA Estimation Program Interface (EPI) Suite. http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/exposure/pubs/episuite.htm


21


524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563

Page 22 of 28

27. Thouand, G.; Friant, P.; Bois, F.; Cartier, A.; Maul, A.; Block, J. C., Bacterial Inoculum Density and Probability of para-Nitrophenol Biodegradability Test Response. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 1995, 30, (3), 274-282. 28. OECD eChem portal: The global portal to information on chemical substances. http://www.echemportal.org/echemportal/index.action (2.4.2013), 29. Lee, Y.; von Gunten, U., Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for the transformation of organic micropollutants during oxidative water treatment. Water Res. 2012, 46, (19), 6177-6195. 30. Pitter, P., Correlation of microbial-degradation rates with the chemical-structure. Acta Hydrochim. Hydrobiol. 1985, (13), 453-460. 31. Itrich, N. R.; McDonough, K. M.; van Ginkel, C. G.; Bisinger, E. C.; LePage, J. N.; Schaefer, E. C.; Menzies, J. Z.; Casteel, K. D.; Federle, T. W., Widespread Microbial Adaptation to l-Glutamate-N,N-diacetate (L-GLDA) Following Its Market Introduction in a Consumer Cleaning Product. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, (22), 13314-13321. 32. Pitter, P.; Chudoba, J., Biodegradability of organic substances in the aquatic environment. CRC Press: 1990. 33. Lu, G. H.; Wang, C.; Yuan, X.; Zhao, Y. H., QSBR study of substituted phenols and benzoic acids. J. Environ. Sci. 2003, 15, (1), 88-91. 34. François, B.; Armand, M.; Marie-José, D.; Thouand, G., From laboratory to environmental conditions: a new approach for chemical’s biodegradability assessment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2016, 23, (18), 18684-18693. 35. Arnot, J. A.; Brown, T. N.; Wania, F.; Breivik, K.; McLachlan, M. S., Prioritizing chemicals and data requirements for screening-level exposure and risk assessment. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012, 120, (11), 1565-1570. 36. EC, TGD Part II: Technical guidance document on risk assessment in support of: Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for new notified substances: Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for existing substances; Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. 2003. 37. Fleischer, M., Regulation and innovation in the chemical industry: A comparison of the EU, Japan and the USA. Surf. Coat. Int., Part B 2003, 86, (1), 21-29. 38. Anastas, P. T.; Warner, J. C., Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press: 2000. 39. Pavan, M.; Worth, A. P., Review of estimation models for biodegradation. QSAR Comb. Sci. 2008, 27, (1), 32-40. 40. Rucker, C.; Kummerer, K., Modeling and predicting aquatic aerobic biodegradation - a review from a user's perspective. Green Chem. 2012, 14, (4), 875-887. 41. Loos, R.; Gawlik, B. M.; Locoro, G.; Rimaviciute, E.; Contini, S.; Bidoglio, G., EU-wide survey of polar organic persistent pollutants in European river waters. Environ. Poll. 2009, 157, (2), 561-568.

564 565


22

Page 23 of 28


a. Probability of degradation

1.0

0.8

0.6

Phenol 4-HBA 4-HQ

0.4

0.2

0.0

Maximum cell concentration in OECD RBT (301 A-F) 104

105

106

107

108

109

108

109

108

109

Cells/mL

b. Probability of degradation

1.0

0.8 4-CP 4-NP 2-N BSA

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0

104

105

106

107

Cells/mL

c. Probability of degradation

1.0

0.8

0.6

2-A1-NSA 1-A2N-4 4-A5-H2,7-N

0.4

0.2

0.0

104

105

106

107

Cells/mL



Figure 1. Probability of degradation for the selected chemicals at different activated sludge inoculum concentrations, displayed as cells/mL. Chemicals are clustered into 3 groups: (a) readily biodegradable; (b) inherently biodegradable or variable reported biodegradation and (c) not readily biodegradable. These assessments were based on regulatory data accessed via eChem portal 22. The standard OECD 301 series inoculum concentrations are marked on the plot by the shaded area.


Page 24 of 28

Page 25 of 28

104


OH Position 2 (ortho-) Position 3 (meta-)

log10 MPN/mL

103

Position 4 (para-)

Br NO2 Fl CH3O Cl CH3 OH COOH

102

101

100 Position 2 (ortho-)

Position 3 (meta-)

Position 4 (para-)

Figure 2. Most Probable Number (MPN) estimates of specific degrader abundance for phenolic compounds derived from the number of wells exhibiting a positive biodegradation outcome, volume contained within negative wells and the total volume contained within all wells. Error bars indicate the standard deviation, which was low for all compounds.



Page 26 of 28

4.0 COOH

3.5

R-Sq (adj) (adj) 0.579 R-Sq 57.9% yy = 2.723 1.239 = 2.723 – 1.239 xx

OH

log MPN

3.0 CH3

Cl

2.5 CH3O

Fl

2.0

1.5

NO2

Br

1.0 -0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

Substituent constants

Figure 3. Regression analysis showing a strong and significant negative correlation (R2 = 0.58, P70 – 100% in 1-20 days) Not readily (6-24% in 14 days) Not readily (0-8% in 14-29 days) No data Low probability of degradation¥ Inherently (13-54% in 28 days) Inherently§ (28-100% in 414 days) Variable (0-100% in 7-28 days) Readily (76.5% in 4 days) Readily (70% in 14 days)


OECD Environmental Range Range

96 tests 28 days

20,000 tests 28 days ……..

Probability of degradation

One test 28 days

Ready (not P)

Inherent (not P)

Persistent (P) Increasing: inoculum concentration; environmental relevance; confidence in persistence assignment


Page 28 of 28

High Throughput Biodegradation-Screening Test To Prioritize and

Recommend Documents