Subscriber access provided by RMIT University Library
Sustainability Engineering and Green Chemistry
Higher Substrate Ratios of Ethanol to Acetate Steered Chain Elongation Toward n-Caprylate in a Bioreactor with Product Extraction Catherine Spirito, Alex Marzilli, and Largus T. Angenent Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b03856 • Publication Date (Web): 18 Oct 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on October 21, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 32
Environmental Science & Technology
1
Higher Substrate Ratios of Ethanol to Acetate Steered Chain Elongation Toward n-
2
Caprylate in a Bioreactor with Product Extraction
3 4
Catherine M. Spirito1, Alexander M. Marzilli1, Largus T. Angenent1,2*
5 6
1
7
14853, USA
8
2
Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Center for Applied Geosciences, University of Tübingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germany
9 10
*Correspondence to:
11
Largus T. Angenent
12
Email:
[email protected] 13
1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
14
ABSTRACT
15
Syngas fermentation to ethanol and acetate has recently been coupled to microbial chain
16
elongation to produce medium-chain carboxylates (MCCs), including n-caproate and n-
17
caprylate. These medium chain carboxylates are relatively hydrophobic, and thus easier to
18
extract from solution than miscible ethanol. Here, we examined the effect of eleven different
19
ethanol-to-acetate substrate ratios (ranging from 1.8 to 275 g COD g COD-1 [1.2 to 183 mole
20
mole-1]) on directing chain elongation toward n-caprylate in a 0.7-L upflow anaerobic filter with
21
product extraction. During an eight-month operating period, we monitored the performance and
22
characterized the microbiome composition of this chain-elongating bioreactor. We also
23
developed a thermodynamic model to predict the favorability of n-caprylate production at
24
different substrate ratios. As predicted by our model, higher ethanol-to-acetate substrate ratios
25
fed to our bioreactor led to higher specificities for n-caprylate production. We observed that
26
feeding primarily ethanol to the bioreactor (i.e., ethanol-to-acetate substrate ratio of 275 g COD
27
g COD-1) resulted in the highest specificity for n-caprylate, but the n-caprylate production rate
28
decreased at this high ratio, resulting in lower conversion efficiencies. Thus, care should be taken
29
not to overload the system with primarily ethanol as the substrate and to lower the organic
30
loading rate.
31 32
INTRODUCTION
33
For syngas fermentation, pyrolysis gas (a mixture of CO, CO2, and H2 gas) from the gasification
34
of organic waste materials (e.g., municipal solid waste or industrial waste), as well as off-gas
35
from steel manufacturing, can be converted into ethanol by anaerobic syngas-fermenting bacteria
36
(i.e., acetogens).1-4 Ethanol production rates of higher than 0.14 mole L-1 h-1 (6 g L-1 h-1) have
2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 32
Page 3 of 32
Environmental Science & Technology
37
been reported for syngas fermentation systems.2,
5
38
commercial syngas fermentation plant went on-line in China in the spring of 2018,6 and the
39
company is currently constructing a plant in Belgium.7 Besides ethanol, acetate is another 2-
40
carbon compound (C2) that is present in the effluent of syngas fermentation systems and the
41
relative product ratio for ethanol and acetate is tunable depending on the operating conditions.2
42
For optimized syngas fermentation systems, the ethanol-to-acetate product ratio can be high,
43
with reported ratios that are typically ~30 (based on chemical oxygen demand [COD] with the
44
unit g COD g COD-1; or a molar ratio of 20 mole mole-1).8, 9 In a recent study by Abubackar et
45
al.,10 the production of primarily ethanol via syngas fermentation by Clostridium
46
autoethanogenum DSM 10061 was reported. Importantly, the concentration of ethanol produced
47
by syngas fermentation is typically limited to 1.3 M (6% w/v) due to the product toxicity of
48
ethanol to acetogens.2
The company Lanzatech announced that a
49 50
Extraction of this dilute ethanol from syngas fermentation broth via distillation is energetically
51
costly. A study by Vane et al.11 estimated that for fractional distillation of 1.3-M ethanol
52
solutions, 0.23 MJ-fuel is required per mole of ethanol distilled. To circumvent energy-intensive
53
ethanol distillation, an alternative route was found by chain elongating ethanol into medium-
54
chain carboxylates (MCCs), such as n-caproate (C6) and n-caprylate (C8).12 This has been
55
performed by pure-, co-, or open-cultures by placing syngas fermentation and chain elongation in
56
series,13-15 or by combining all pathways into one-stage bioreactor.16-18 With open cultures of
57
microbial consortia (reactor microbiomes),19-21 the pH of the broth can be lowered to mildly
58
acidic conditions (5-5.5)12,
59
conditions the MCCs exist at relatively high concentrations as undissociated carboxylic acid
15
to inhibit acetoclastic methanogens. At these mildly acidic
3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 4 of 32
60
species (pKa ~ 4.9),22 which have a low maximum solubility concentration. In-line product
61
extraction systems can be employed to maximize chain elongation by removing the accumulating
62
undissociated medium-chain carboxylic acids, which can become toxic to bacteria.23 The
63
coupling of a mildly acidic broth and an in-line product extraction system should result in the
64
extraction of the product from the broth at much lower energy consumption rates than ethanol
65
distillation, though an in-depth energy consumption analysis has not been conducted. To avoid
66
addition of acid or base to the bioreactor and extraction system, an in-line membrane electrolysis
67
system (i.e., an electrochemical system) was employed by Xu et al.24 following the extraction
68
unit of the bioreactor. By using renewable electric power, n-caproic acid can be separated from
69
the extraction solution by taking advantage of the innate pH gradient between the anode and
70
cathode of the membrane electrolysis system.
71 72
An electron donor, such as ethanol or lactic acid, is required to provide the energy and carbon to
73
chain elongate by the reverse β-oxidation pathway. Syngas fermentation broth, as mentioned
74
previously, has a relatively high ethanol-to-acetate substrate ratio. Previous pure-culture studies
75
of reverse β-oxidation with Clostridium kluyveri have shown that higher ethanol-to-acetate
76
substrate ratios led to higher n-caproate-to-n-butyrate product ratios in both batch25,
77
continuously-fed27 bioreactors. Open-culture studies have also found that higher ethanol
78
concentrations can drive chain elongation toward n-caproate, as long as the ethanol concentration
79
does not become inhibitory.28-30 A recent study by Kucek et al.15 demonstrated via batch tests
80
that increasing concentrations of ethanol compared to acetate also led to increased production of
81
n-caprylate compared to n-caproate. A simple generalized stoichiometric model demonstrated
82
that increased ethanol-to-acetate substrate ratios created more thermodynamically favorable
4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
26
and
Page 5 of 32
Environmental Science & Technology
83
conditions for chain elongation to n-caproate,20 which explained the higher n-caproate-to-n-
84
butyrate product ratios that others had observed (see above). This previous model by Angenent et
85
al.20 did not include n-caprylate production.
86 87
Here, our main objective was to test eleven different ethanol-to-acetate substrate ratios ranging
88
from 1.8 to 275 g COD g COD-1 (1.2 to 183 mole mole-1) in a continuously operated chain-
89
elongating bioreactor with product extraction to steer the production toward n-caprylate. In
90
addition, we investigated whether n-caprylate could be produced from primarily ethanol in the
91
substrate (i.e., an ethanol-to-acetate substrate ratio 275 g COD g COD-1), which had not
92
previously been demonstrated. We extended the thermodynamic model by Angenent et al.20 to n-
93
caprylate and we used our experimental data to validate the model. Finally, we characterized the
94
bioreactor microbiome via Illumina 16S rRNA gene sequencing during the operating period (30
95
time points) at two different sampling locations in the bioreactor and correlated the relative
96
abundance data with n-caprylate specificity data.
97 98
MATERIALS AND METHODS
99
Growth Medium, Inoculum, and Bioreactor Setup
100
The composition for the growth medium that we used has been described previously.14, 15 For
101
each operating period, the substrate concentrations of ethanol and acetate in the growth medium
102
were varied to achieve the targeted ethanol-to-acetate substrate ratios (Table 1). At the end of a
103
previous study in our lab,15 the bioreactor had been overloaded for research purposes, and as a
104
result its performance had suffered. We kept the reactor microbiome in the system, however, and
105
between the end of the previous study and the beginning of Period 1 an operating period of
5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
106
approximately six months was required to recover the performance (data not shown). The
107
bioreactor system was described previously.15 An upflow anaerobic filter (working volume 0.7
108
L) was operated with a continuous in-line membrane-based liquid-liquid extraction (i.e.,
109
pertraction) system. The substrate feed flow rate that we used was approximately 0.6 L d-1, while
110
the system recycle flow rate was 130 L d-1, which resulted in a recycle-to-feed ratio of ~220. The
111
hydraulic retention time (HRT) was ~1.2 days. The temperature of the bioreactor was maintained
112
at 30±1ºC, while the pH of the bioreactor broth was maintained at 5.26±0.09 via addition of 0.5
113
M hydrochloric acid to the well-mixed recycle and feed inlet at the base of the bioreactor. The
114
alkaline extraction solution was initially buffered with 0.3 M sodium borate and was then
115
maintained at pH 9.48±0.34 via addition of 5 M sodium hydroxide. When the n-caprylate
116
concentration in the alkaline extraction solution reached ~150-200 mM, two-thirds of the
117
extraction solution was removed (so 2-L out of ~ 3-L) and deionized water plus 5 M sodium
118
hydroxide was used to bring it back to its original 3-L volume. The purpose of this step was to
119
maintain efficient extraction rates from the bioreactor by maintaining low n-caprylate
120
concentrations in the extraction solution.
121 122
Operating Periods
123
Information on analysis and calculations is given in the supplementary information. When we
124
use the terminology ethanol-to-acetate substrate ratio, we consistently report the ratio of the
125
measured ethanol and acetate concentrations in the influent and express this ratio as g COD g
126
COD-1, with the molar ratio included in parenthesis for convenience. Measured moles of ethanol
127
and carboxylates were converted to a g COD basis using the following conversion factors (g
128
COD to mole): 96 (ethanol); 64 (acetate); 112 (propionate); 160 (n-butyrate), 208 (n-valerate),
6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 32
Page 7 of 32
Environmental Science & Technology
129
256 (n-caproate), 304 (n-heptanoate), and 352 (n-caprylate). On the other hand, when we use the
130
terminology ethanol-to-acetate liquor ratios, this is in relationship to our thermodynamic
131
model for which we used the ratio of the measured concentrations of ethanol and acetate (mM) in
132
the effluent, which we assume the active biomass to experience in the mixed liquor. During the
133
acclimation period (Period 1), the average organic loading rate (OLR) was 18.7 g COD L-1 d-1
134
with an ethanol-to-acetate substrate ratio of 11.7 g COD g COD-1 (7.8 mole mole-1) (Table 1).
135
During the main period (Periods 2 to 7), we operated the bioreactor at the following ethanol-to-
136
acetate substrate ratios: 275 (Period 2), 16.9 (Period 3), 6.7 (Period 4), 3.6 (Period 5), 2.9 (Period
137
6), and 1.8 g COD g COD-1 (Period 7) (equivalent molar ratios are: 183, 11.3, 4.5, 2.4, 1.9, and
138
1.2 mole mole-1, respectively), while maintaining a higher OLR of between 23.3 to 28.2 g COD
139
L-1 d-1 compared to Period 1 (Table 1). We operated the bioreactor at each ratio for an operating
140
period of at least two weeks (11 HRTs). During the recovery period (Periods 8 to 11), following
141
a loss of performance at an ethanol-to-acetate substrate ratio of 1.8 g COD g COD-1 (i.e., no
142
detectable n-caprylate production and a decrease in n-caproate production rates, Table S2), we
143
ran another set of ethanol-to-acetate substrate ratios: 5.1 (Period 8), 6.5 (Period 9), 6.0 (Period
144
10), and 135 g COD g COD-1 (Period 11) (equivalent molar ratios are: 3.4, 4.3, 4, and 90 mole
145
mole-1, respectively) (Table 1).
146 147 148 149 150 151
Table 1. Operating data for each period in the acclimation, main, and recovery periods are reported as mean ± standard error. During Period 9, the extraction system was switched off for the bioreactor. For Period 10, measurements of acetate were not available (na) for the influent. Therefore, values reported for ethanol-to-acetate substrate ratio and OLR are an approximation. Period
Days
HRT (d)
Ethanol (mM)
Acetate (mM)
OLR (g COD L-1 d-1)
1.2 ± 0.02
Ethanol-to-acetate substrate ratio (g COD g COD-1) 11.7 ± 1.0
Period 1
0 to 42
200 ± 9.42
25.7 ± 1.75
18.7 ± 0.81
Period 2
43 to 55
1.17 ± 0.05
275 ± 58.3
289 ± 3.64
1.58 ± 0.33
25.2 ± 1.1
Period 3
56 to 71
1.27 ± 0.07
16.9 ± 2.1
282 ± 5.21
25.0 ± 3.01
23.9 ± 1.43
7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 8 of 32
Period 4
72 to 84
1.16 ± 0.04
6.7 ± 0.4
282 ± 10.5
63.4 ± 3.35
28.2 ± 1.24
Period 5
85 to 101
1.17 ± 0.04
3.6 ± 0.3
223 ± 10.65
94.1 ± 4.74
25.2 ± 1.18
Period 6
102 to 119
1.2 ± 0.05
2.9 ± 0.1
216 ± 5.26
112 ± 3.41
24.6 ± 1.08
Period 7
120 to 136
1.2 ± 0.04
1.8 ± 0.1
178 ± 4.53
146 ± 6.24
23.3 ± 0.85
Period 8
137 to 181
1.14 ± 0.04
5.1 ± 0.5
218 ± 9.68
64.6 ± 6.1
23.5 ± 1.16
Period 9
182 to 202
1.2 ± 0.04
6.5 ± 0.5
245 ± 11.92
56.4 ± 3.55
24.0 ± 1.31
Period 10
203 to 214
1.14 ± 0.04
6
221 ± 17.14
na
24
Period 11
215 to 242
1.12 ± 0.05
135 ± 18.1
287 ± 6.08
3.18 ± 0.42
26.2 ± 1.35
152 153
Microbial Community Analysis
154
We collected biomass samples for Illumina 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis from ports
155
located at the bottom and middle of the bioreactor height approximately weekly throughout the
156
operating period by following the method previously described by Kucek et al.15 The bioreactor
157
was mixed by withdrawing and refilling a 60-mL syringe ten times at each sampling port to
158
resuspend the flocculent biomass prior to sampling. We did not observe clearly defined biofilms
159
on the packing material in the bioreactor, so we did not perform biofilm sampling. Pelleted
160
biomass samples were stored at -80°C until further processing. Genomic DNA was extracted
161
using the PowerSoil-htp 96 Well Soil DNA Isolation kit (MO BIO Laboratories Inc., Carlsbad,
162
CA) according to the protocol of the manufacturer. The DNA amplification protocol was
163
described previously31 with the following changes: Mag-Bind RxnPure Plus magnetic beads
164
solution (Omega Biotek, Norcross, GA, USA) was used instead of Mag-Bind E-Z Pure and 50 ng
165
DNA per sample was pooled instead of 100 ng. Duplicate PCR reactions of each DNA extract
166
were performed and pooled prior to sequencing. Paired-end reads were joined in QIIME
167
v.1.9.132 using the joined_paired_ends.py script and then the joined reads were uploaded to
168
QIITA (qiita.microbio.me) for further processing. The sortmerna method33 was used to bin
169
sequences in operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at 97% identity. Taxonomy was assigned for
170
representative sequences selected for each OTU using the Greengenes v.13.8 database.34 The 8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 32
Environmental Science & Technology
171
remaining analyses were performed locally in QIIME and R v.3.3.2.35 Singletons (i.e., OTUs that
172
were observed fewer than two times in the entire dataset) were removed from the dataset
173
resulting in 932 unique OTUs.
174 175
Alpha diversity was analyzed via the Gini coefficient (a measure of unevenness), observed OTUs
176
(richness), and Shannon diversity36 metrics available in QIIME. One hundred rarefactions at a
177
depth of 6,510 sequences per sample were performed and collated. Statistical analyses of the
178
alpha diversity results were performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD in
179
R. In addition, heat maps were created to represent OTU relative abundance via the gplots
180
package in R.37 Correlations of OTU relative abundance with n-caprylate specificities was
181
investigated using the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient via rcorr function38,
182
Hmisc package in R. P-values were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery
183
rate (FDR) method40 via the function p.adjust in the stats package in R. Correlations with
184
adjusted p-values |ΔGreq| for scenario 1 in Fig. S2), as well as the formation of mixtures of n-butyrate, n-
327
caproate, and n-caprylate (|ΔGrxn|>|ΔGreq| for scenarios 2 and 3 in Fig. S2). Indeed, we observed
328
high n-caprylate-to-n-caproate product ratios of 5.9 and 2.0 g COD g COD-1 (4.3 and 1.5 mole
329
mole-1) and n-caprylate specificities of 82% and 64% for our bioreactor during Periods 2 and 3,
330
respectively (Table S1).
331 332
During Period 4 at an ethanol-to-acetate substrate ratio of 6.7 g COD g COD-1 (4.5 mole mole-1)
333
(Table 1), the ethanol-to-acetate liquor ratio declined to 3.11 (Table S3). At this ratio that was
334
observed by the microbiome, the model predicted that formation of only n-caprylate was not
335
thermodynamically feasible, but formation of a mixture of n-butyrate, n-caproate, and n-
336
caprylate was (|ΔGrxn|>|ΔGreq| for scenarios 2 and 3, but not scenario 1 in Fig. S2). This mixed
337
product spectrum was experimentally verified (Fig. 1 and Table S1). At the lowest ethanol-to-
338
acetate substrate ratios that we maintained during the main period (i.e., 3.6, 2.9 and 1.8 during
339
Periods 5, 6, and 7, respectively, Table 1), the ethanol-to-acetate liquor ratios were also
16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 32
Page 17 of 32
Environmental Science & Technology
340
correspondingly low (i.e., 1.4, 1.0, and 0.6, respectively, Table S3). At these liquor ratios none
341
of the scenarios that we tested were thermodynamically feasible (Fig. S2), ruling out
342
considerable amounts of n-caprylate production from our thermodynamic model. However, we
343
did observe lower n-caprylate production during Periods 5 and 6 with specificities of 25.7% and
344
23.7%, respectively, but did not observe any n-caprylate production during Period 7 (Fig. 1 and
345
Table S1). These experimental specificities for Periods 5 to 6 were, indeed, lower than the
346
alleged specificity for our 3rd scenario (i.e., 1.5 moles n-butyrate, 1.5 moles n-caproate, and
347
0.625 moles n-caprylate), which would have translated into a 35.3% n-caprylate specificity based
348
on COD, and which was not possible according to our model (Fig. S2).
349 350
Even though the predictions of our model are in agreement with the bioreactor performance, real
351
care should be taken in using the model, because of our over-simplifications and assumptions.
352
First, we assumed that the effluent ethanol and acetate concentrations represented a uniform
353
concentration in the bioreactor experienced by the microbiome. In fact, we saw different
354
microbiome compositions at two different sampling locations in our bioreactor across the study
355
period (discussed later in the text), which suggests that the substrate composition (i.e., ethanol-
356
to-acetate liquor ratio may have varied throughout the bioreactor height. Second, we developed a
357
formula for the moles of ATP produced by our model assuming that the Rnf complex
358
(ferredoxin-NAD oxidoreductase complex) found in C. kluyveri was being used to establish a
359
proton gradient across the cell membrane and drive ATP production. Wang et al.42 have reported
360
that under low ethanol and acetate concentrations (~1 mM), and therefore correspondingly lower
361
reaction Gibbs free energies, C. kluyveri can adjust the activity of two enzymes (an electron
362
bifurcating Nfn complex and a NADP+dependent β-hydroxybutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase) to
17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
363
decrease its ATP production requirements. Our current model does not account for this potential
364
shift in ATP production (and lower associated Gibbs free energy requirements) in considering
365
the thermodynamic feasibility of n-caprylate production. Third, our model was based on the
366
reported metabolism of C. kluyveri, which may not represent the actual situation for our reactor
367
microbiome. Fourth, this model was designed for a system with product extraction (e.g., our
368
bioreactor) where n-caprylate is continuously being removed from the bioreactor broth. Our
369
model does not account for the effect of product toxicity on n-caprylate production, and therefore
370
cannot be directly applied to batch systems without product extraction.
371 372
Primarily Ethanol in the Substrate Led to Lower MCC Production Rates Than When
373
Acetate was Present
374
To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate n-caproate and n-caprylate production
375
from primarily ethanol as the substrate of a bioreactor (i.e., an ethanol-to-acetate ratio of 275 g
376
COD g COD-1 [183 mole mole-1] during Period 2). Even though ethanol as the primary substrate
377
led to the highest n-caprylate specificity of 81.9% (Table S1), it also led to a lower sum of n-
378
butyrate and MCC production rates (to estimate the total chain elongation rates) of 13.2 g COD
379
L-1 d-1 during Period 2 compared to 17.6 g COD L-1 d-1 during Period 1 (Table S2) at a
380
considerably higher OLR of 25.2 compared to 18.7 g COD L-1 d-1, respectively (Table 1).
381
During Periods 3 to 6 with similar OLRs than Period 2, the sum of n-butyrate and MCC
382
production rates was also higher compared to Period 2 and remained between 14.5 and 19.9 g
383
COD L-1 d-1 (Table S2), resulting in higher n-butyrate plus MCC conversion efficiencies during
384
Periods 3 to 6 compared to during Period 2 (Table S4). These conversion efficiencies increased
385
from 60.5% and 80.6% between Period 3 and Period 6, while the conversion efficiency was
18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 32
Page 19 of 32
Environmental Science & Technology
386
52.6% during Period 2 (Table S4). Thus, the total chain elongation rate was considerably lower
387
for Period 2 when primarily ethanol was used as a substrate compared to the period before and
388
after. The lower sum of n-butyrate and MCC production rates resulted in a higher average
389
effluent ethanol concentration during Period 2 compared to Periods 3 to 6 with a maximum
390
concentration up to 95 mM on Day 61 during Period 2 (Fig. 2B), even though the OLR was
391
similar (Table 1). Therefore, ethanol availability was not the reason for the sluggish chain
392
elongation rates. The ethanol concentration remained well below the concentrations that have
393
previously been found to be inhibitory in a pure-culture study (460 mM)26 and in an open-culture
394
study (~300 mM).15
395 396
Our model does not provide kinetic information, but it may guide us in finding an explanation
397
for the sluggish chain elongation rates during Period 2. At the highest ethanol-to-acetate ratios,
398
our thermodynamic model (Eq. 1) predicted an increased production of hydrogen via reverse β-
399
oxidation. Possibly, increased hydrogen concentrations in the bioreactor at the highest ethanol-
400
to-acetate ratio acted to slow the kinetics by lowering the ATP production of reverse β-oxidation,
401
and therefore by reducing the n-caprylate production rates. This was explained before by
402
Angenent et al.20 because of a shift from a pathway with both substrate-level phosphorylation
403
and transport-coupled phosphorylation at low hydrogen partial pressures to a pathway with
404
solely substrate-level phosphorylation pathway at high hydrogen partial pressures. Here, we have
405
not been able to experimentally confirm this hypothesized shift in pathways. Others found hints
406
as well for a slower kinetic rate of chain elongation with ethanol when hydrogen was anticipated
407
to be at higher concentrations. For example, Roghair et al.43 found slow kinetic rates for chain
408
elongation with ethanol in an ethanol/propionate fed bioreactor, but also found that by adding
19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
409
CO2 to lower the hydrogen partial pressure (due to methanogenesis), the rate of chain elongation
410
with ethanol was stimulated greatly. A different explanation for a more sluggish chain elongation
411
rate with increasing ethanol-to-acetate molar ratios was given by Leng et al.,44 who found an
412
optimum energy release at a ratio of 3 with a simple thermodynamic model that included only n-
413
butyrate and n-caproate production.
414 415
Regardless of the explanation for a slower chain-elongating rate with primarily ethanol, we did
416
not find a clear optimum ethanol-to-acetate substrate ratio that would satisfy the maximum n-
417
caprylate specificity, the n-caprylate production rate, and the total chain elongation rate. Clearly,
418
the highest n-caprylate specificity of 82% was observed with the highest ethanol-to-acetate
419
substrate ratio of 275. However, primarily feeding ethanol at this ratio decreased the n-caprylate
420
production rates and also the total chain elongation rates, and thus care should be taken to not
421
over load the system with such lower production rates by lowering the organic loading rates. We
422
found the total chain elongation rate to be the highest at 19.9 g COD L-1 d-1 at an ethanol-to-
423
acetate substrate ratio of 2.9 g COD g COD-1 (1.9 mole mole-1) during Period 6 (Table S2).
424 425
Reactor Microbiomes in Bottom and Middle of Bioreactor Were Different
426
We performed a time-series analysis of the microbiome sampled from the bottom and middle
427
sampling ports of our upflow bioreactor during all the study periods (Periods 1 to 11). Clear
428
differences in the composition of the microbiomes from the bottom and middle port of the
429
bioreactor were observed throughout the operating period (Fig. 3, Fig. S3, Fig. S4). The majority
430
of samples from the bottom of the bioreactor had a higher relative abundance of the phylum
431
Firmicutes compared to the phylum Proteobacteria (Fig. S4A), whereas the reverse was true in
20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 20 of 32
Page 21 of 32
Environmental Science & Technology
432
the middle of the bioreactor (Fig. S4B). The bottom and middle port samples consisted of 53 and
433
56 OTUs, respectively, which reached a higher than one percent relative abundance in at least
434
one of the bioreactor samples (Fig. 3 and Fig. S3). Of these OTUs, the bottom port had 15
435
unique OTUs (primarily belong to the phylum Firmicutes, highlighted in blue in Fig. 3) and the
436
middle port had 18 unique OTUs (primarily belonging to the phylum Proteobacteria, highlighted
437
in blue in Fig. S3). This difference in communities is similar to the microbial community
438
stratification that has previously been observed in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors for
439
methane production.45 Potential differences in substrate concentrations, pH, and oxygen
440
concentrations throughout the height of the bioreactor may have played an important role in the
441
differences observed. Though we employed a high recycle-to-feed flow rate ratio (~220) in this
442
study, the packing material in the bioreactor may have interfered with efficient mixing of the
443
bioreactor. From anaerobic digestion studies, we already know that the composition of substrate
444
is a large driver of the community composition46. Because we were adding our substrate to the
445
base of the bioreactor, we hypothesize that a higher chain-elongating activity occurred in the
446
bottom of the bioreactor compared to in the middle. Though, more work would need to be
447
performed to confirm this. Our observations of different microbial communities in the two
448
sampling locations highlight the need for multiple microbiome sampling locations in a bioreactor
449
that is not completely mixed. We note that the study by Kucek et al.15 only characterized the
450
microbiome in the middle of the bioreactor.
451 452
Despite the differences observed in our microbiomes, we did see some common trends. We
453
examined which populations of OTUs in the bottom and middle ports of our bioreactor were
454
significantly positively or negatively correlated with n-caprylate specificities (FDR-adjusted p-
21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
455
value