Highly Stereoselective Biocatalytic Synthesis of Key Cyclopropane

Oct 17, 2016 - PDF. cs6b02550_si_001.pdf (755.72 kB). Citing Articles; Related Content. Citation data is made available by participants in Crossref's ...
3 downloads 31 Views 374KB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS

Letter

Highly Stereoselective Biocatalytic Synthesis of Key Cyclopropane Intermediate to Ticagrelor Kari E. Hernandez, Hans Renata, Russell D. Lewis, S. B. Jennifer Kan, Chen Zhang, Jared Forte, David Rozzell, John A. McIntosh, and Frances H. Arnold ACS Catal., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b02550 • Publication Date (Web): 17 Oct 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on October 17, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

ACS Catalysis is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 15

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Catalysis

1

Highly Stereoselective Biocatalytic Synthesis of Key

2

Cyclopropane Intermediate to Ticagrelor

3

AUTHOR NAMES

4

Kari E. Hernandez†, Hans Renata†,§, Russell D. Lewis‡, S. B. Jennifer Kan†, Chen Zhang¶, Jared

5

Forte¶, David Rozzell¶, John A. McIntosh†,♯, and Frances H. Arnold†,‡,*

6

AUTHOR ADDRESSES

7



8

California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91125, United States

9

§

Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering and ‡Biology and Biological Engineering,

Current address: Department of Chemistry, Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, 33458,

10

United States

11



12



Provivi, Inc., Santa Monica, CA, 90404, United States Current address: Merck, Kenilworth, NJ, 07033, United States

13 14

KEYWORDS

15

biocatalysis, directed evolution, ticagrelor, cyclopropanation, Bacillus subtilis, truncated globin

16

ABSTRACT

17

Extending the scope of biocatalysis to important non-natural reactions such as olefin

18

cyclopropanation will open new opportunities for replacing multi-step chemical syntheses of

19

pharmaceutical intermediates with efficient, clean, and highly selective enzyme-catalyzed

20

processes. In this work, we engineered the truncated globin of Bacillus subtilis for the synthesis

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

1

ACS Catalysis

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

1

of a cyclopropane precursor to the antithrombotic agent ticagrelor. The engineered enzyme

2

catalyzes the cyclopropanation of 3,4-difluorostyrene with ethyl diazoacetate on a preparative

3

scale to give ethyl-(1R, 2R)-2-(3,4-difluorophenyl)-cyclopropanecarboxylate in 79% yield, with

4

very high diastereoselectivity (>99% dr) and enantioselectivity (98% ee), enabling a single-step

5

biocatalytic route to this pharmaceutical intermediate.

Page 2 of 15

6 7

TEXT Ticagrelor (1) is a P2Y12 antagonist developed by AstraZeneca under the trade name

8 9

Brilinta® (Figure 1). It was approved by the FDA in 2011 for the prevention of platelet

10

aggregation after the occurrence of a thrombotic event.1 Sales in 2015 were $619 million and are

11

projected to go as high as $3.5 billion by 2023.2-3 Most of the patented syntheses of ticagrelor

12

use a key chiral cyclopropane intermediate, (1R,2S)-2-(3,4-difluorophenyl)cyclopropan-1-amine

13

(2). The various methods reported for the preparation of this building block are lengthy,

14

requiring resolutions, chiral auxiliaries or expensive catalysts to obtain the desired enantiomer.4-

15

18

16

pharmaceutical production ‘greener’.19-20 A notable example of success in the development of

17

biocatalytic alternatives can be found in Merck’s production of sitagliptin, used to treat Type 2

18

diabetes. Directed evolution was used to engineer a transaminase to synthesize the drug under

19

industrial process conditions; the result was a biocatalytic process with 10-13% higher product

20

yield, a 19% reduction in overall waste, and elimination of all heavy metals.21 Similarly,

21

biocatalysis can potentially offer very high selectivity and environmentally friendly process

22

conditions for the synthesis of ticagrelor. Turner and coworkers recently examined three

23

complementary biocatalytic routes for the preparation of cyclopropylamine 2.22 They

Recently, there has been a push to use biocatalysts in order to decrease toxic wastes and make

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

2

Page 3 of 15

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Catalysis

1

demonstrated that a ketoreductase could convert 1-(3,4-difluorophenyl)-3-nitropropan-1-one to

2

the corresponding enantiopure alcohol, a building block that could lead to cyclopropylamine 2 in

3

two to three steps; alternatively, a lipase or amidase could be used for kinetic resolution of a

4

racemic mixture of cyclopropyl ester or amide to yield chiral precursors suitable for the

5

preparation of 2.

6

Recent reports from our laboratory23-24 and others25-26 have shown that heme proteins can

7

catalyze the cyclopropanation of various olefins using diazo compounds. Cyclopropyl motifs are

8

present in many bioactive and synthetic compounds and serve as versatile intermediates in

9

organic synthesis.27-28 The proteins reported to catalyze olefin cyclopropanation have proven to

10

be amenable to directed evolution for increased activity and to obtain the desired product with

11

high diastereo- and enantioselectivity in a single step: for example, Wang et al. engineered a

12

cytochrome P450 to produce the chiral cyclopropane core of levomilnacipran.24

13

Here we report an enantioselective synthesis of the chiral cyclopropane core of ticagrelor

14

(Figure 1C) using a whole-cell biocatalyst expressing an engineered heme protein derived from

15

Bacillus subtilis group II truncated hemoglobin (UniProt ID: O31607).29 This engineered enzyme

16

catalyzes the cyclopropanation of commercially available 3,4-difluorostyrene (DFS, 3) using

17

ethyl diazoacetate (EDA, 4) to provide one-step access to ethyl-(1R,2R)-2-(3,4-difluorophenyl)-

18

cyclopropanecarboxylate (R,R)-5, an ester precursor of the ticagrelor cyclopropylamine 2, with

19

excellent selectivity for the desired stereoisomer.

20

We began by screening various heme proteins for their ability to catalyze the reaction of

21

DFS (3) with EDA (4) to produce the ticagrelor cyclopropyl ester (R,R)-5. Most of the proteins

22

tested, such as the H64V V68A variant of sperm whale myoglobin,25 gave primarily the opposite

23

enantiomer of the desired precursor. Three proteins gave an enantio-enriched product with the

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

3

ACS Catalysis

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 4 of 15

1

desired (R,R)-configuration: B. subtilis group II truncated globin, Hydrogenobacter thermophilus

2

cytochrome c M59A Q62A, and Bacillus megaterium P450-BM3 T268A C400H, which gave

3

product in 34, 44, and 8 % ee, respectively. Mutagenesis was performed on all three proteins, but

4

substantial improvement in enantioselectivity was only observed with variants of the B. subtilis

5

group II truncated globin. The directed evolution strategy we used to optimize the performance

6

of this protein is outlined below.

7

B. subtilis group II truncated globin is a small (132 residues, 15 kDa) monomeric protein

8

with very high oxygen affinity and a published crystal structure (PDB ID: 1UX8).29 We

9

hypothesized that iron-carbenoid formation occurred in the distal region of the heme and that

10

mutation of amino acid residues in this nascent “active site” could improve its catalytic

11

performance. Bordeaux et al. showed that mutations at H64 and V68 in sperm whale myoglobin

12

could tune the stereoselectivity of the cyclopropanation reaction between ethyl diazoacetate and

13

styrene.25 We chose the analogous residues in B. subtilis truncated globin (T45 and Q49, based

14

on a sequence alignment, see Supplemental Information) and targeted those two sites for

15

mutagenesis (Figure 2). The two residues were mutated simultaneously to one of three residues

16

(leucine, phenylalanine, and alanine) in an attempt to find variants that would improve the yield

17

and enantioselectivity of the reaction. The T45A Q49A double mutant stood out as highly

18

selective, yielding the desired product in 95% ee with a yield of 57%. Modeling with a Dunbrack

19

rotamer library30 suggests that the amount of space in the nascent active site is increased when

20

the polar and larger threonine and glutamine are mutated to smaller, non-polar alanine.

21

Truncated globins natively bind oxygen and do not have an active site for catalysis; we

22

attribute the observed improvement in selectivity to the formation of a binding pocket on the

23

distal side of the heme, which presumably binds the substrates in an orientation that favors

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

4

Page 5 of 15

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Catalysis

1

formation of the desired product. To further improve enantioselectivity, site-saturation

2

mutagenesis was performed at position A45, and the distal heme ligand Y25. While mutations at

3

A45 failed to improve enantioselectivity, screening of the Y25 library led to the discovery of

4

variant Y25L T45A Q49A, which maintained the yield of the parent protein while affording

5

>99% dr and 97% ee at 20 mM DFS and 40 mM EDA.

6

To further increase product yield, the Y25L T45A Q49A variant was expressed in two E.

7

coli BL21 derivative cell lines C41(DE3) and C43(DE3), which have been optimized to

8

overexpress mildly toxic proteins.31 Both C41(DE3) and C43(DE3) cells expressing the Y25L

9

T45A Q49A variant showed increases in enantio- and diastereoselectivity through improved

10

expression of the recombinant protein. The engineered protein now effectively outcompetes the

11

small amount of background reaction from the cells (which produces racemic product).32 The

12

C43(DE3) line displayed the highest diastereo- and enantioselectivity (>99% dr and ee) at 20

13

mM DFS/40 mM EDA and was selected for use in preparative-scale reactions.

14

Preparative scale (0.4 mmol, 20 mL) reactions were performed anaerobically23-24 using

15

whole-cell catalyst (OD600=80) and 20 mM DFS/40 mM EDA (Figure 3). Initially these

16

reactions were done with simultaneous addition of the bacterial catalyst and reagents, which gave

17

high selectivity for the desired product, but only ~50% yield. After testing a range of reaction

18

conditions, we found that slow addition of the whole-cell catalyst and EDA (4) solutions to DFS

19

(3) over the course of 3 hours gave the ticagrelor cyclopropyl ester (R,R)-5 as virtually a single

20

isomer (>99% dr, 98% ee) in 79% yield (see Supporting Information). It is likely that slow

21

addition slows down the formation of EDA dimer and reduces catalyst inactivation by carbene

22

transfer to the protein (heme cofactor and nucleophilic side chains) rather than the DFS, an

23

inactivation mechanism we recently analyzed in detail in another cyclopropanation enzyme.33

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

5

ACS Catalysis

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

1

Page 6 of 15

This work has generated an efficient, stereoselective, and potentially low-cost bacterial

2

biocatalyst for producing the cyclopropane precursor to the antithrombotic agent ticagrelor. The

3

ester product of the biocatalytic reaction (R,R)-5, can be converted easily to the amine ticagrelor

4

precursor 2 via ammonolysis followed by Hofmann rearrangement16 of the corresponding amide

5

or a Curtius rearrangement9 on the corresponding acyl azide. This work has also demonstrated

6

how directed evolution can rapidly optimize a newly discovered enzyme activity, olefin

7

cyclopropanation, to achieve desired product selectivity and yield. With careful process

8

optimization, processes based on biological catalysts such as reported here can continue to

9

replace far less environmentally friendly methods for producing pharmaceutical intermediates.

10

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

6

Page 7 of 15

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

1

ACS Catalysis

FIGURES (A) N

N

N N HO

F

HN

N

(B)

F

F

EtO 2C

S

F

F

OH O

(R,R)-5

1

2

OH

(C) F +

EtO 2C

B. subtilis truncated globin

N2

F

EtO 2C

+

3

F

EtO 2C

F

F

2

F

H 2N

(R,R)-5

4

F (S,S)-5

3

Figure 1. (A) Structure of ticagrelor 1. (B) The cyclopropyl ester precursor 5 can be converted to

4

the cyclopropylamine precursor 2 by making the acyl azide and performing a Curtius

5

rearrangement9 or via ammonolysis followed by Hofmann rearrangement16 of the corresponding

6

amide. (C) Cyclopropanation of 3,4-difluorostyrene (3) with ethyl diazoacetate (4) catalyzed by

7

engineered heme protein makes the cyclopropyl ester 5.

Y25

Q49

T45

8 9 10

Figure 2. Positions of the Y25, T45, and Q49 residues near the heme iron in the B. subtilis wildtype protein (PDB ID: 1UX8).

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

7

ACS Catalysis

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

A)

Page 8 of 15

100 75

% ee 50 (trans) 25 0

wild-type

T45A Q49A Y25L T45A Q49A

100

B) 98 % ee (trans) 96

94

BL21

1

C41

C43

2

Figure 3. (A) Enantioselectivity of the cyclopropanation reaction catalyzed by various B. subtilis

3

variants. Reaction conditions: OD600=60, 20 mM DFS/40 mM EDA. (B) Enantioselectivity of

4

the cyclopropanation reaction catalyzed by B. subtilis T45A Q49A Y25L expressed in various E.

5

coli strains. Reaction conditions: OD600=60, 20 mM DFS/40 mM EDA. The error bars represent

6

standard deviation of % ee (trans) for the reactions run in triplicate.

7 8

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

9

Supporting information available: experimental procedures, standard curves, and characterization

10

of ticagrelor cyclopropyl ester (R,R)-5. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at

11

http://pubs.acs.org.

12 13

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

8

Page 9 of 15

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Catalysis

1

AUTHOR INFORMATION

2

Corresponding author

3

*E-mail: [email protected] (Frances H. Arnold)

4 5

Funding sources

6

This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation, Office of Chemical,

7

Bioengineering, Environmental and Transport Systems SusChEM Initiative (grant CBET-

8

1403077) and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Biological Robustness in

9

Complex Settings Contract HR0011-15-C-0093. Funding for this work to Provivi, Inc. from the

10

National Science Foundation under Phase 1 STTR Grant 1549855 is also gratefully

11

acknowledged. R.D.L. is supported by NIH/NRSA training grant (5 T32 GM07616). Any

12

opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of

13

the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organizations.

14 15

Notes

16

Caltech and FHA have a financial ownership interest in Provivi, Inc., the company sponsoring

17

this research through the National Science Foundation STTR Program. FHA and Caltech may

18

benefit financially from this interest if the company is successful in making product(s) that is/are

19

related to this research. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by

20

Caltech in accordance with its conflict of interest policies.

21 22 23

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

9

ACS Catalysis

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 10 of 15

1

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

2

We thank Dr. S. Virgil and the Center for Catalysis and Chemical Synthesis (3CS) at Caltech for

3

assistance with the SFC.

4 5

ABBREVIATIONS

6

EDA, ethyl diazoacetate; DFS, 3,4-difluorostyrene

7

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

10

Page 11 of 15

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Catalysis

1

REFERENCES

2

(1)

3

269.

4

(2)

5

https://www.astrazeneca.com/media-centre/press-releases/2016/full-year-and-q4-2015-results-

6

04022016.html (accessed Aug 24, 2016)

7

(3)

8

(press release), May 6, 2014.

9

https://www.astrazeneca.com/media-centre/press-releases/2014/astrazeneca-updated-strategy-

Wijeyeratne, Y. D.; Joshi, R.; Heptinstall, S. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. 2012, 5, 257-

AstraZeneca, Full-Year and Q4 2015 Results (press release), Feb 4, 2016.

AstraZeneca, AstraZeneca Issues Update on Strategy to Deliver Value to Shareholders

10

value-for-shareholders-06052014.html (accessed Aug 24, 2016)

11

(4)

12

d)pyrimidine Compounds. WO 0034283, Jun 15, 2000.

13

(5)

14

2001036421 A1, May 25, 2001.

15

(6)

16

Compounds. WO 0192263 Dec 6, 2001.

17

(7)

18

Carboxylic Acid Esters and Derivatives. US Patent 7,122,695 B2, Oct 17, 2006.

19

(8)

20

C.; Chapman, D.; Dixon, J.; Guile, S. D.; Humphries, R. G.; Hunt, S. F.; Ince, F.; Ingall, A. H.;

21

Kirk, I. P.; Leeson, P. D.; Leff, P.; Lewis, R. J.; Martin, B. P.; McGinnity, D. F.; Mortimore, M.

22

P.; Paine, S. W.; Pairaudeau, G.; Patel, A.; Rigby, A. J.; Riley, R. J.; Teobald, B. J.; Tomlinson,

23

W.; Webborn, P. J.; Willis, P. A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 6013-6018.

Guile, S.; Hardern, D.; Ingall, A.; Springthorpe, B.; Willis, P. Novel Triazolo(4,5-

Guile, S.; Springthorpe, B. Novel [1,2,3]-Triazolo[4,5-d]pyrimidine Compounds. WO

Larsson, U.; Magnusson, M.; Musil, T.; Palmgren, A. Novel Triazolo Pyrimidine

Clark, A.; Jones, E.; Larsson, U.; Minidis, A. Process for the Preparation of Cyclopropyl

Springthorpe, B.; Bailey, A.; Barton, P.; Birkinshaw, T. N.; Bonnert, R. V.; Brown, R.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

11

ACS Catalysis

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 12 of 15

1

(9)

Mitsuda, M.; Moroshima, T.; Tsukuya, K.; Watabe, K.; Yamada, M. A Process for the

2

Preparation of Optically Active Cyclopropylamines. WO 2008018823 A1, Feb 14, 2008.

3

(10)

4

Aromatic Cyclopropane Esters and Amides. WO 2008018822 A1, Feb 14, 2008.

5

(11)

6

Recknagel, M.; Weiss, U. A Process for Preparing [1S-[1-alpha, 2-alpha, 3-beta (1S*, 2R*) 5-

7

beta] ]-3-[7-[2-(3, 4-Difluorophenyl) -cyclopropylamino]-5-(propylthio)-3H-1, 2, 3-triazolo[4, 5-

8

d]pyrimidin-3-yl]-5-(2-hydroxyethoxy)cyclopentane-1, 2-diol and to its Intermediates. WO

9

2010030224 A1, Mar 18, 2010.

Dejonghe, J.-P.; Peeters, K.; Renard, M. Chemical Process for the Preparation of

Aufdenblatten, R.; Bohlin, M. H.; Hellstroem, H.; Johansson, P. W.; Larsson, U. G.;

10

(12)

Dejonghe, J.-P.; Peeters, K.; Renard, M. Chemical Process for Preparation of

11

Intermediates. US Patent 7,863,469 B2, Jan 4, 2011.

12

(13)

13

Phenylcyclopropylamine Derivatives Using Novel Intermediates. WO 2011132083 A3, Oct 27,

14

2011.

15

(14)

16

Phenylcyclopropylamine Derivatives and Use thereof for Preparing Ticagrelor. WO 2012001531

17

A2, Jan 5, 2012.

18

(15)

19

22, 3598-3602.

20

(16)

21

WO 2013124280 A1, Aug 29, 2013.

22

(17)

23

Chem. 2013, 21, 2795-2825.

Khile, A. S.; Patel, J.; Trivedi, N.; Pradhan, N. S. Novel Process for Preparing

Khile, A. S.; Nair, V.; Trivedi, N.; Pradhan, N. S. Novel Processes for the Preparation of

Zhang, H.; Liu, J.; Zhang, L.; Kong, L.; Yao, H.; Sun, H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012,

Sterk, D.; Zupancic, B. Synthesis of 2-(3,4-Difluorophenyl)cyclopropanecarboxylic Acid.

Ding, H. X.; Liu, K. K.-C.; Sakya, S. M.; Flick, A. C.; O'Donnell, C. J. Bioorg. Med.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

12

Page 13 of 15

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Catalysis

1

(18)

Shinde, G. B.; Mahale, P. K.; Padaki, S. A.; Niphade, N. C.; Toche, R. B.; Mathad, V. T.

2

Springerplus 2015, 4, 493-504.

3

(19)

Pollard, D. J.; Woodley, J. M. Trends Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 66-73.

4

(20)

Dunn, P. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 1452-1461.

5

(21)

Savile, C. K.; Janey, J. M.; Mundorff, E. C.; Moore, J. C.; Tam, S.; Jarvis, W. R.;

6

Colbeck, J. C.; Krebber, A.; Fleitz, F. J.; Brands, J.; Devine, P. N.; Huisman, G. W.; Hughes, G.

7

J. Science 2010, 329, 305-309.

8

(22)

9

Chem. 2016, 14, 8064-8067

Hugentobler, K. G.; Sharif, H.; Rasparini, M.; Heath, R. S.; Turner, N. J. Org. Biomol.

10

(23)

Coelho, P. S.; Brustad, E. M.; Kannan, A.; Arnold, F. H. Science 2013, 339, 307-310.

11

(24)

Wang, Z. J.; Renata, H.; Peck, N. E.; Farwell, C. C.; Coelho, P. S.; Arnold, F. H. Angew.

12

Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 6810-6813.

13

(25)

Bordeaux, M.; Tyagi, V.; Fasan, R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 1744-1748.

14

(26)

Gober, J. G.; Rydeen, A. E.; Gibson-O'Grady, E. J.; Leuthaeuser, J. B.; Fetrow, J. S.;

15

Brustad, E. M. ChemBioChem 2016, 17, 394-397.

16

(27)

Chen, D. Y.-K.; Pouwer, R. H.; Richard, J.-A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 4631-4642.

17

(28)

Reissig, H.-U.; Zimmer, R. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 1151-1196.

18

(29)

Giangiacomo, L.; Ilari, A.; Boffi, A.; Morea, V.; Chiancone, E. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280,

19

9192-9202.

20

(30)

Dunbrack, R. L.; Karplus, M. J. Mol. Biol. 1993, 230, 543-574.

21

(31)

Miroux, B.; Walker, J. E. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 260, 289-298.

22

(32)

Weissenborn, M. J.; Löw, S. A.; Borlinghaus, N.; Kuhn, M.; Kummer, S.; Rami, F.;

23

Plietker, B.; Hauer, B. ChemCatChem 2016, 8, 1636-1640.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

13

ACS Catalysis

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

1

(33)

2

H. Identification of Mechanism-Based Inactivation in P450-Catalyzed Cyclopropanation

3

Facilitates Engineering of Improved Enzymes, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 12527-12533.

Page 14 of 15

Renata, H.; Lewis, R. D.; Sweredoski, J.; Moradian, A.; Hess, S.; Wang, Z. J.; Arnold, F.

4 5 6 7 8

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

14

Page 15 of 15

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

1

ACS Catalysis

TOC graphic

F

HN N F F

EtO 2C

EtO 2C

N2

B. subtilis truncated globin Y25L T45A Q49A

F

N

N

F

N HO

N

F S

OH O

OH

ticagrelor

2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

15