How Fine Structural Differences of Xylooligosaccharides and

The objective of this research was to understand how the structural differences of XOS and AXOS influenced the growth of Bacteroides species commonly ...
0 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
Subscriber access provided by Miami University Libraries

Functional Structure/Activity Relationships

How fine structural differences of xylo-oligosaccharides and arabinoxylooligosaccharides regulate differential growth of Bacteroides species Mihiri Mendis, Eric C. Martens, and Senay Senay Simsek J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01263 • Publication Date (Web): 04 Jun 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on June 4, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 25

1 2

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Title: How fine structural differences of xylo-oligosaccharides and arabinoxylo-oligosaccharides regulate differential growth of Bacteroides species

3 4

Mihiri Mendisa, Eric C. Martensb, and Senay Simseka#

5

a

6

ND, 58108-6050

7

b

8

Arbor, MI

9

#

Department of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, PO Box 5050, Dept 7670 Fargo,

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann

Corresponding Author: Senay Simsek

10

Corresponding author. Phone: (701) 231-7737. Fax: (701) 231-8474.

11

E-mail: [email protected]

12

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

13

Abstract

14

Xylo-oligosaccharides (XOS) and arabinoxylo-oligosaccharides (AXOS) could be used

15

to selectively favor growth of certain gut bacterial groups. The objective of this research was to

16

understand how the structural differences of XOS and AXOS influenced the growth of

17

Bacteroides species commonly found in the intestine. We report that the specific structural

18

details of XOS and AXOS dictate the differential growth of Bacteroides species in the intestine.

19

We also investigated the expression of two polysaccharide utilization loci (PULs) in a strain of

20

B. ovatus upon growth on AXOS using three different susC transcripts as sentinel reporter genes.

21

23- α-L-arabinofuranosyl-xylotriose (A4) was shown to upregulate small xylan PUL gene

22

expression while 23, 33-di- α-L-arabinofuranosyl-xylotriose (A6) decreased expression of this

23

PUL. These results reveal new details about the potentially very specific structure-function

24

relationship of XOS and AXOS that could be used in targeted alteration of the microbial

25

population in the gut through dietary interventions to maintain health.

26

Key words: Bacteroides species, polysaccharide utilization loci (PUL) gene expression,

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 25

Page 3 of 25

27 28

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Introduction The intestine is an important organ that consists of an extensive surface area and permits

29

vital interactions with the external world, including with the gut microbiota.1 The microbiota

30

refers to “the microbial life forms within a given habitat or host.”2 The gut microbiota exerts a

31

significant impact on host physiology, impacting the control of energy homeostasis, the immune

32

system, digestion and vitamin synthesis1 and inhibition of pathogen colonization.3 More so, the

33

involvement of gut microbiota in conditions such as depression4 and autism5 has also been

34

suggested. A potential role between the microbiome and Parkinson’s (PD) disease6 and multiple

35

sclerosis (MS)7 has also been indicated.

36

Studies of healthy adult gut microbiota have shown that it is composed primarily of

37

members of a few bacterial phyla, with the Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes being most numerous.8

38

The Bacteroidetes generally encode more carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) than other

39

phyla such as Firmicutes, indicating their enhanced capacity to utilize wide range of

40

polysaccharide substrates.9 The members of the genus Bacteroides are adept at utilizing plant

41

and host derived polysaccharides10 These Bacteroides are rich in CAZymes involved in the

42

acquisition and metabolism of various glycosides including glycoside hydrolases and

43

polysaccharide lyases which are organized into polysaccharide utilization loci (PULs) that are

44

distributed throughout the genome.10

45

Different bacteria have preferential growth on different substrates. It was observed that

46

different Bacteroides species preferred different substrates depending on the structural and

47

chemical complexity of the polysaccharide substrate.11 This indicates that just as dietary

48

polysaccharides have the potential to alter the growth of specific bacteria, these polysaccharides

49

can be utilized for selective targeting of specific bacteria. Xylan is a polysaccharide that is found

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

50

in many plant materials. Xylans consists of a back bone of β-(1 → 4)-linked xylopyranose units

51

onto which 4-O-methylglucuronic acid (MeGlcA) groups, O-acetyl groups or other sugars such

52

as arabinose can be substituted at C (O)-2 and/or C (O)-3 positions.12 Ferulic acid can be found

53

attached to the C(O)-5 position of these arabinose13 Arabinoxylans are xylans with arabinose

54

substitution at C-2 and/or C-3 positions of the xylan backbone. Arabinoxylans are prevalent in

55

many cereal grains: wheat (5.5-7.2%), barley (3.9-5.4%), maize (1-2%), rice (2-3%).14

56

Arabinoxylans can be hydrolyzed into xylo-oligosaccharides (XOS) and arabinoxylo-

57

oligosaccharides (AXOS).

58

Genus Bacteroides contain the most expanded glycolytic gene repertoires that target

59

xylan degradation.15 Previous research has shown closely related Bacteroides species to utilize

60

xylan in different ways.11 Rose, et al. 16 indicated differences among the fermentation profiles for

61

AX from different cereals (maize, rice and wheat), which consists of different structural features.

62

Xu 17 concluded that specific molecular regions of dietary fibers differentiate gut bacteria.

63

Depending on the structural complexity of the XOS and AXOS, different Bacteroides species

64

could respond to these substrates differently. Understanding how these structurally different

65

oligosaccharides influence the growth of commensal bowel bacteria could lead to manipulation

66

of the gut microbiome through introduction of XOS and AXOS to correct dysbiosis. Thus, the

67

objective of this research was to understand how the structural differences of XOS and AXOS

68

impacted the growth of Bacteroides species commonly found in the intestine.

69

Materials and Methods

70

Materials

71 72

The bacterial fermentation experiments were carried out using six publicly available Bacteroides strains belonging to five different species. The strains were: Bacteroides

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 25

Page 5 of 25

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

73

cellulosilyticus DSM 14838, Bacteroides ovatus ATCC 8483, Bacteroides ovatus 3-1-23 ,

74

Bacteroides eggerthii DSM 20697, Bacteroides intestinalis DSM 17393, Bacteroides

75

xylanisolvens XB1A , Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron ATCC 29148 (VPI 5482). All strains were

76

originally isolated from human colon or fecal samples, representative of the most commonly

77

encountered xylanolytic organisms in the gut.

78

All the carbohydrate substrates were purchased from Megazyme. These included five

79

XOS samples: 1,4-β-D-xylobiose (X2), 1,4-β-D-xylotriose (X3), 1,4-β-D-xylotetraose (X4), 1,4-

80

β-D-xylopentaose (X5), 1,4-β-D-xylohexaose (X6) and 7 AXOS samples: 1,5-α-L-arabinobiose

81

(A2), 32- α-L-arabinofuranosyl-xylobiose (A3), 23- α-L-arabinofuranosyl-xylotriose (A4), 33- α-

82

L-arabinofuranosyl-xylotetraose (A5), 23, 33-di- α-L-arabinofuranosyl-xylotriose (A6), 23- α-L-

83

plus-33- α-L-Arabinofuranosyl-xylotriose (A7), 23, 33-di- α-L-arabinofuranosyl-xylotetraose

84

(A8), 23- α-L-plus-33- α-L-arabinofuranosyl-xylotetraose (A9) and three arabinoxylan

85

polysaccharides: low molecular weight AX (AX L), medium molecular weight AX (AX M),

86

high molecular weight AX (AX H), monosaccharides: xylose (Xyl), arabinose (Ara), glucose

87

(Glu).

88

Pure strain growth experiments

89

The bacterial growth experiments were carried out according to the methods described by

90

Martens, et al. 18 Each carbohydrate substrate was prepare in to stock solutions (10 mg/mL)

91

using millipore water. Each substrate solution was autoclaved at 121 ºC for 20 min. Substrate

92

solution (30 µL) was pipetted into one of the designated wells on a 24 × 16 plate assigning three

93

wells for each substrate per bacterial strain. Each bacterial strain inoculum was added to each

94

well (30 µL), diluting the final substrate concentration to 5 mg/mL.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

95

The bacterial inocula were prepared as follows: each bacterium was inoculated into

96

custom chopped meat media using sterile wood sticks from glycerol stocks from freezer. These

97

cultures for assay inoculations were grown for 24 h at 37 0C under an anaerobic atmosphere of

98

10% H2, 5% CO2, and 85% N2 using an anaerobic chamber (Coy manufacturing, Grass Lake,

99

MI).

100

Bacteroides minimal media was prepared using minimal media19 supplemented with

101

additional compounds.20 In detail Bacteroides minimal media was prepared by adding together

102

10 mL Bacteroides salts solution (KH2PO4 (544 g), NaCl (35 g), (NH4)2SO4 (45 g) dissolved in

103

1L), 100 µL each of Vitamin K3 (1 mg/mL in ethanol), FeSO4 (0.4 mg/mL in 10 mM HCl),

104

MgCl2 (0.1M in water), CaCl2 (0.8% (w/v) in water), Histidine/Hematin solution (1.9 mM

105

Hematin in 0.2M Histidine solution), 50 µL of vitamin B12 stock (0.01 mg/mL in water), 100 mg

106

L-cysteine, and 1 mL each of Balch’s vitamin mixture, trace mineral solution, Purine and

107

Pyrimidine solution, and amino acid solution20 and bringing the volume to 50 mL with distilled

108

water (pH 7.2) and filter sterilizing the media.

109

The culture (1 mL) was drawn into 1.5 mL centrifuge tube and was centrifuged at 10 ×

110

1000g for 1 min. The supernatant was discarded and Bacteroides minimal medium (1 mL) was

111

added and the bacterial pellet was re-suspended in it. This was again centrifuged (10 × 1000g for

112

1 min) to wash the bacteria. This step was repeated another time. After discarding the second

113

washing, the bacterial pellet was re-suspended in 1 mL of Bacteroides minimal medium. This

114

was the washed culture. Washed culture was pipetted into Bacteroides minimal medium to

115

prepare the “diluted bacterial culture” (1:50 ratio, OD