HST-MRM-MS: A Novel High-Sample-Throughput Multiple Reaction

Oct 22, 2018 - Absolute quantification of clinical biomarkers by mass spectrometry (MS) has been challenged due to low sample-throughput of current mu...
1 downloads 0 Views 716KB Size
Subscriber access provided by University of South Dakota

Article

HST-MRM-MS: A Novel High-Sample-Throughput Multiple Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometric Method for Multiplex Absolute Quantitation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Serum Biomarker Hucong Jiang, Lei Zhang, Ying Zhang, Liqi Xie, Yi Wang, and Haojie Lu J. Proteome Res., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00790 • Publication Date (Web): 22 Oct 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on October 26, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Journal of Proteome Research

HST-MRM-MS: A Novel High-SampleThroughput Multiple Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometric Method for Multiplex Absolute Quantitation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Serum Biomarker Hucong Jiang †, Lei Zhang†,‡, Ying Zhang†,‡, Liqi Xie†,‡, Yi Wang‡ and Haojie Lu†,‡,* † Shanghai Cancer Centre and Department of Chemistry, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P. R. China ‡ Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P. R. China. *

To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]; Fax:

+86-21-54237961; Tel: +86-21-54237618

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Proteome Research 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 2 of 33

ABSTRACT: Absolute quantification of clinical biomarkers by mass spectrometry (MS) has been challenged due to low sample-throughput of current multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) methods. To overcome this problem, in this work, a novel high-sample-throughput multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometric (HST-MRM-MS) quantification approach is developed to achieve simultaneous quantification of 24 samples. Briefly, triplex dimethyl reagents (L, M, and H) and eight-plex iTRAQ reagents were used to label the N-termini and C-termini of the Lys C digested peptides respectively. The triplex dimethyl labeling produces three co-elute peaks in MRM traces, while the iTRAQ labeling produces eight peaks in MS2, resulting 24 (3*8) channels in a single experiment. HSTMRM-MS has shown good accuracy (R2>0.98 for absolute quantification), reproducibility (RSD 0.980. From Table S3 (Supporting Information), we found that the experimental amounts were smaller than expected values when the iTRAQ ratio was large especially in gradient f and gradient g (For example, the experimental amount of PAAT was about 2.50 ng in gradient g, however, the expected values was 7.08 ng). It suggested that the dynamic range of iTRAQ-labeling was compressed, as mentioned by Desouza et al.27 Additionally, the relative standard deviations (RSDs) of most channels at different concentration were less than 15%, indicating the good reproducibility of this method (Table S3). In addition, the triple references mixed at 1 : 1 : 1 were measured at ratio of 0.83 − 1.2 in most mixtures, which has demonstrated the accuracy of the results (Table S3). In order to assess the dynamic range of relative quantification based on the ratios of isotopic peak areas in MRM traces analysis and the ratios of reporter ion intensities in MS2 analysis, two mixtures of synthetic standard peptides were prepared. (I).The amounts of 16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 17 of 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Journal of Proteome Research

triplex dimethyl labeled peptides were set as (L : M : H = 0.5 : 1 : 0.5), and for each dimethyl group, the sample were divided into eight parts according to the ratio of iTRAQ (113 : 114 : 115 : 116 : 117 : 118 : 119 : 121 = 1 : 2 : 2 : 4 : 4 : 2 : 2 : 1), then labeled with eight-plex iTRAQ reagents, accordingly. (II). Expected ratio of dimethyl labeling was set as (L : M : H = 1 : 0.5 : 1), and the ratio of iTRAQ was set as (113 : 114 : 115 : 116 : 117 : 118 : 119 : 121 = 4 : 2 : 2 : 1 : 1 : 2 : 2 : 4). To ensure the accuracy of relative quantification results, the amount of every peptide was set in a concentration range closed to its endogenous abundance. Pooled unlabeled serum sample was also added as blank matrix background. In the MRM-MS analysis results of the two mixtures, the XICs of triplex MRM traces and the MS2 spectra of eight-plex reporter ions from the best transition (y4) of the standard peptide PAAT were shown as an example in Figure S3 (Supporting Information). For mixture (I), bar graphs showed that the measured ratio of the MRM traces is close to the expected value (0.5 : 1 : 0.5) for all the three target peptides and the RSDs of every peptide were less than 10% in all dimethyl types (Figure 4a1, 4b1, 4c1). This result indicated that the relative quantification obtained from the MRM traces are of good accuracy and reproducibility. The intensities of iTRAQ-113 and iTRAQ-121 were set as the denominator, and the calibration curves were made by comparing other iTRAQ labeling channels to the denominator. The results of every dimethyl type from every peptide showed a good linear response with R2 > 0.985 (Figure 4a2, 4b2, 4c2), which supported the 17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Proteome Research 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

reliability of relative quantification results by comparing intensities of reporter ions. As shown in Figure S4 in the Supporting Information, the bar graphs and the calibration curves for relative quantification of mixture (II) also showed good accuracy, reproducibility and dynamic range. These results demonstrated that HST-MRM-MS strategy could achieve reliable and reproducible quantification not only in absolute quantification but also in relative quantification. Application for Protein Quantification in HCC Sera HST-MRM-MS strategy was further applied for protein quantitation of HCC serum samples. For each protein, one unique peptide was selected as the quantitation surrogate (Table 1), and 21 HCC serum specimens, 21 postoperative HCC serum specimens and 21 normal serum specimens were used. Because of the high-throughput of the method, all of the serum specimens could be quantitative analyzed in only three experiments, and each experiment was analyzed three times by MRM-MS. The absolute concentrations of the three proteins in every sample were calculated and shown in Table 2 (for details, see Table S4, Supporting Information) and are plotted in Figure 5. DISCUSSION Protein C3 is synthesized by liver hepatocytes. It plays a central role in the complement system and contributes to innate immunity.28 The amounts of C3 decreased slightly in HCC 18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 18 of 33

Page 19 of 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Journal of Proteome Research

serum compared to normal human serum, and there was no significant difference between post-HCC serum and normal serum. It has been reported that C3 levels in plasma showed an overall trend of lower expression in those with liver cirrhosis (LC) compared to controls, and with a ‘‘bounce back’’ effect seen as the protein levels are somewhat restored to control levels in the HCC serum specimens.19 From our results, AAT expression in HCC serum and post-HCC serum was higher than that in normal human serum specimens. It was reported that AAT levels are marginally increased with LC followed by a marked upregulation with progression to HCC.19 Meanwhile, AAT is considered an acute-phase reactant as its plasma levels increase during the hostresponse to inflammation or tissue injury.29 Therefore, from the results of our experiments, postoperative HCC serum with high AAT level was reasonable. The function of HPX is scavenging the heme released or lost by the turnover of heme proteins such as hemoglobin and thus it protects the body from the oxidative damage that free heme can cause.30 In our study, HPX expression in HCC serum was decreased compared to normal human serum, and the decrease between postHCC serum and normal serum was slight. The trend for HPX expression was reported similar to that of C3 with its levels dropping from control to LC are somewhat restored to control levels in HCC.19,21 In summary, we developed a new HST-MRM-MS strategy combining triplex nonisobaric labeling (dimethyl) and eight-plex isobaric labeling (iTRAQ). Thus, this method expanded the throughput of MRM-MS to 24 channels in a single MRM-MS 19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Proteome Research 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 20 of 33

experiment. The new method showed good accuracy, reproducibility, linear response and finally successfully applied in evaluating amounts of three candidate biomarkers in HCC related serum specimens. With this method, we found the concentrations of C3 and HPX were decreased slightly in HCC serum compared to normal human serum, while the expressions of AAT were increased in HCC serum. In all, HST-MRM-MS shows a promising future in the quantitative proteomics for high-throughput verification of candidate biomarkers.

20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 21 of 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Journal of Proteome Research

FIGURES

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of UHT-MRM-MS strategy.

21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Proteome Research 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 22 of 33

Figure 2. (a) MRM trace and (b, c, d) MS2 spectra of endogenous target peptide PAAT (SVLGQLGITK). In the MRM trace (a), blue represents L-dimethyl, green represents M-dimethyl, and orange represents H-dimethyl. (b), (c) and (d) shows the MS2 spectra of reporter ions from triplex dimethyl labeling types L, M and H, respectively.

22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 23 of 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Journal of Proteome Research

Figure 3. Calibration curves of triplex dimethyl labeled synthetic standard peptides (a1) PC3-L, (a2) PC3-M, (a3) PC3-H, (b1) PAAT-L, (b2) PAAT-M, (b3) PAAT-H, (c1) PHPX-L, (c2) PHPX-M, and (c3) PHPXH, for absolute quantification. The average ratios were calculated and plotted with error bars of standard deviation based on three times analysis by MRM-MS.

23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Proteome Research 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 24 of 33

Figure 4. Bar graphs of triplex dimethyl labeling types (L : M : H = 1 : 0.5 : 1) of labeled synthetic standard peptides (a1) PC3, (b1) PAAT, and (c1) PHPX, and the dynamic range of relative quantification of MS2 of labeled synthetic standard peptides (a2) PC3, (b2) PAAT, and (c2) PHPX. The average was calculated and plotted with error bars of standard deviation based on three times analysis by MRM-MS. (Blue represents L-dimethyl, green represents M-dimethyl, and orange represents H-dimethyl)

24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 25 of 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Journal of Proteome Research

Figure 5. Concentration distribution of C3, AAT and HPX in HCC serum, postoperative HCC serum and normal serum (μg/μL serum).

25 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Proteome Research 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 26 of 33

TABLES Table 1. Transitions Used for MRM Analysis.

Proteins

Peptides

Label

Precursor

Charge

Product

Charge

type

(Q1)

state (Q1)

(Q3)

state (Q3)

CE (V)

1005.67 (y6) L

696.41

3+

807.54 (y4)

1+

31.50

1+

31.50

1+

31.50

1+

37.10

1+

37.10

1+

37.10

1+

35.00

1+

35.00

1+

35.00

694.45 (y3) Complement C3

RIPIEDGSGEVVLSRK

(C3)

( PC3 )

1005.67 (y6) M

697.75

3+

807.54 (y4) 694.45 (y3) 1005.67 (y6)

H

699.09

3+

807.54 (y4) 694.45 (y3) 1133.72 (y8)

L

674.43

2+

1020.64 (y7) 722.47 (y4)

Alpha-1-antitrypsin (AAT)

1133.72 (y8) SVLGQLGITK ( PAAT )

M

676.44

2+

1020.64 (y7) 722.47 (y4) 1133.72 (y8)

H

678.45

2+

1020.64 (y7) 722.47 (y4) 1133.72 (y8)

L

724.05

3+

1020.64 (y7) 722.47 (y4)

Hemopexin(HPX)

SGAQATWTELPWPHEK ( PHPX )

1133.72 (y8) M

725.39

3+

1020.64 (y7) 722.47 (y4) 1133.72 (y8)

H

726.73

3+

1020.64 (y7) 722.47 (y4)

26 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 27 of 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Journal of Proteome Research

Table 2. Concentration of C3, AAT and HPX in HCC serum, postoperative HCC serum and normal serum (μg/μL serum).

Serum type (μg/μL) Protein

HCC

Post-HCC

Normal

C3

0.92±0.47

1.20±0.55

1.27±0.54

AAT

0.81±0.40

1.33±0.70

0.65±0.27

HPX

0.41±0.13

0.77±0.23

0.91±0.38

27 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Proteome Research 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 28 of 33

ASSOCIATED CONTENT Supporting Information: The following supporting information is available free of charge at ACS website http://pubs.acs.org Table S1. Clinical features of the patients and healthy volunteers. (PDF) Table S2. The theoretical amount of three peptide for the calibration mixtures of all dimethylation types. (PDF) Table S3. The actual amounts of peptides and RSDs for absolute quantitation. Table S4. Detailed concentration of C3, AAT and HPX. (PDF) Figure S1. MALDI TOF MS spectra of the labeling efficiency and specificity of triplex N-terminal dimethylation. (PDF) Figure S2. MALDI-TOF MS1 and MS2 spectra of the each labeling steps of standard peptide. (PDF) Figure S3. The MRM traces and MS2 spectra of the labeled standard peptide. Figure S4. Bar graphs and the calibration curves for relative quantification of mixture (II). (PDF) AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding Author

28 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 29 of 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Journal of Proteome Research

*Tel: +86 21 54237618. E-mail: [email protected]. ORCID Notes The authors declare no competing financial interest. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC0906600 and 2016YFA0501303), NSF (Grants 21335002 and 31670835), the Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (20130071110034), Key Laboratory of Glycoconjugates Research Ministry of Public Health and Shanghai Projects (Eastern Scholar, 15JC1400700 and B109), Special Project on Precision Medicine under the National Key R&D Program Program (SQ2017YFSF090210).

29 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Proteome Research 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 30 of 33

REFERENCES (1) Patel, S., Role of proteomics in biomarker discovery and psychiatric disorders: current status, potentials, limitations and future challenges. Expert Rev. Proteomics 2012, 9, (3), 249-265. (2) Parker, C. E.; Borchers, C. H., Mass spectrometry based biomarker discovery, verification, and validation--quality assurance and control of protein biomarker assays. Mol. Oncol. 2014, 8, (4), 840-858. (3) Rifai, N.; Gillette, M. A.; Carr, S. A., Protein biomarker discovery and validation: the long and uncertain path to clinical utility. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24, (8), 971983. (4) Makawita, S.; Diamandis, E. P., The bottleneck in the cancer biomarker pipeline and protein quantification through mass spectrometry-based approaches: current strategies for candidate verification. Clin. Chem. 2010, 56, (2), 212-222. (5) Hüttenhain, R.; Malmström, J.; Picotti, P.; Aebersold, R., Perspectives of targeted mass spectrometry for protein biomarker verification. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2009, 13, (5), 518-525. (6) Mcintosh, M.; Fitzgibbon, M., Biomarker validation by targeted mass spectrometry. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009, 27, (7), 622-623. (7) Domon, B.; Gallien, S., Recent advances in targeted proteomics for clinical applications. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 2015, 9, (3-4), 423-431. (8) Sajic, T.; Liu, Y.; Aebersold, R., Using data-independent, high resolution mass spectrometry in protein biomarker research: Perspectives and clinical applications. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 2015, 9, (3-4), 307-321. (9) Picotti, P.; Aebersold, R., Selected reaction monitoring–based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, (6), 555566. (10) Kiyonami, R.; Schoen, A.; Prakash, A.; Peterman, S.; Zabrouskov, V.; Picotti, P.; Aebersold, R.; Huhmer, A.; Domon, B., Increased selectivity, analytical precision, and throughput in targeted proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2011, 10, (2), M110.002931. (11) Castillo, M. J.; Mcshane, A. J.; Cai, M.; Shen, Y.; Wang, L.; Yao, X., Nonisotopic Reagents for a Cost-Effective Increase in Sample Throughput of Targeted Quantitative Proteomics. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, (18), 9209-9216.' (12) Yin, H. R.; Zhang, L.; Xie, L. Q.; Huang, L. Y.; Xu, Y.; Cai, S. J.; Yang, P. Y.; Lu, H. J., Hyperplex-MRM: A Hybrid Multiple Reaction Monitoring Method Using mTRAQ/iTRAQ Labeling for Multiplex Absolute Quantification of Human Colorectal Cancer Biomarker. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12, (9), 3912-3919. (13) Yang, S. J.; Nie, A. Y.; Zhang, L.; Yan, G. Q.; Yao, J.; Xie, L. Q.; Lu, H. J.; Yang, P. Y., A novel quantitative proteomics workflow by isobaric terminal labeling. J. Proteomics 2012, 75, (18), 5797-5806. 30 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 31 of 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Journal of Proteome Research

(14) Xie, B.; Sharp, J. S., Relative Quantification of Sites of Peptide and Protein Modification Using Size Exclusion Chromatography Coupled with Electron Transfer Dissociation. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectr. 2016, 27, (8), 1-6. (15) Ressom, H. W.; Xiao, J. F.; Tuli, L.; Varghese, R. S.; Zhou, B.; Tsai, T. H.; Ranjbar, M. R. N.; Yi, Z.; Wang, J.; Poto, C. D., Utilization of Metabolomics to Identify Serum Biomarkers for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 743, (18), 90-100. (16) Mustafa, G. M.; Larry, D.; Petersen, J. R.; Elferink, C. J., Targeted proteomics for biomarker discovery and validation of hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis C infected patients. World J. Hepatol. 2015, 7, (10), 1312-1324. (17) Daniele, B.; Bencivenga, A.; Megna, A. S.; Tinessa, V., Alpha-fetoprotein and ultrasonography screening for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterol. 2004, 127, (5 Suppl 1), S108-112. (18) Colli, A.; Fraquelli, M.; Casazza, G.; Massironi, S.; Colucci, A.; Conte, D.; Duca, P., Accuracy of ultrasonography, spiral CT, magnetic resonance, and alpha-fetoprotein in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2006, 101, (3), 513-523. (19) Fye, H. K.; Wrightdrakesmith, C.; Kramer, H. B.; Camey, S.; Nogueira, D. C. A.; Jeng, A.; Bah, A.; Kirk, G. D.; Sharif, M. I.; Ladep, N. G., Protein profiling in hepatocellular carcinoma by label-free quantitative proteomics in two west African populations. Plos One 2013, 8, (7), e68381. (20) Ahn, Y. H.; Shin, P. M.; Kim, Y. S.; Oh, N. R.; Ji, E. S.; Kim, K. H.; Lee, Y. J.; Kim, S. H.; Yoo, J. S., Quantitative analysis of aberrant protein glycosylation in liver cancer plasma by AAL-enrichment and MRM mass spectrometry. Analyst 2013, 138, (21), 6454-6462. (21) Kobayashi, S.; Nouso, K.; Kinugasa, H.; Takeuchi, Y.; Tomoda, T.; Miyahara, K.; Hagihara, H.; Kuwaki, K.; Onishi, H.; Nakamura, S., Clinical utility of serum Fucosylated-hemopexin in Japanese patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Hepatol. Res. 2012, 42, (12), 1187-1195. (22) Qin, H.; Wang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, Z.; Song, C.; Wu, R.; Ye, M.; Zou, H., Isobaric cross-sequence labeling of peptides by using site-selective N-terminus dimethylation. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, (50), 6265-6267. (23) Melissa K. T.; Daniel W. C.; David C.; Andrew K. G.; William E. G.; Karl E. K.; William R.; Martin S.; Lynn S.; Sanford S.; Wendy W.; Dean E. B. Standard operating procedures for serum and plasma collection: early detection research network consensus statement standard operating procedure integration working group. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, (1), 113–117. (24) Apinya L.; Sri V. S.; John P. B.; Raynell J. C.; Elizabeth L. S.; Teresa A. M.; Linda M. S.; Ileana A.; Catherine D. M.; David M. N.; Nicholas F. L.; Piet C. G.; Narayanan M.; Konstantinos N. L.; Gregory J. G.; Michael R. C.; Rosebud O. R.; Terry M. T.; Jerry A. K.; Lewis R. R. The Utility of AFP-L3% in The Diagnosis of Hepatocellular 31 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Proteome Research 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 32 of 33

Carcinoma: Evaluation in A U.S. Refferral Population. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2007, 5, (3), 394–267. (25) Unwin, R. D.; Griffiths, J. R.; Leverentz, M. K.; Grallert, A.; Hagan, I. M.; Whetton, A. D., Multiple Reaction Monitoring to Identify Sites of Protein Phosphorylation with High Sensitivity. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4, (8), 1134-1144. (26) Unwin, R. D.; Griffiths, J. R.; Whetton, A. D., A sensitive mass spectrometric method for hypothesis-driven detection of peptide post-translational modifications: multiple reaction monitoring-initiated detection and sequencing (MIDAS). Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, (6), 870-877. (27) Desouza, L. V.; Taylor, A. M.; Li, W.; Minkoff, M. S.; Romaschin, A. D.; Colgan, T. J.; Siu, K. W., Multiple reaction monitoring of mTRAQ-labeled peptides enables absolute quantification of endogenous levels of a potential cancer marker in cancerous and normal endometrial tissues. J. Proteome Res, 2008, 7, (8), 3525-3534. (28) Stephan, A. H.; Barres, B. A.; Stevens, B., The Complement System: An Unexpected Role in Synaptic Pruning During Development and Disease. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2012, 35, (1), 369-389. (29) Rudnick, D. A.; Perlmutter, D. H., Alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency: a new paradigm for hepatocellular carcinoma in genetic liver disease. Hepatol. 2005, 42, (3), 514– 521. (30) Tolosano, E.; Altruda, F., Hemopexin: structure, function, and regulation. Dna Cell Biol. 2002, 21, (4), 297-306.

32 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 33 of 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Journal of Proteome Research

For TOC Only

33 ACS Paragon Plus Environment