Impact of Ohmic Resistance on Measured Electrode Potentials and

For example, should the RE be placed near the brush surface (fibers) or near the metal current collector core? It is recommended that very small, Lugg...
4 downloads 0 Views 421KB Size
Subscriber access provided by NEW MEXICO STATE UNIV

Energy and the Environment

The Impact of Ohmic Resistance on Measured Electrode Potentials and Maximum Power Production in Microbial Fuel Cells Bruce E. Logan, Emily Zikmund, Wulin Yang, Ruggero Rossi, Kyoung-Yeol Kim, Pascal E. Saikaly, and Fang Zhang Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02055 • Publication Date (Web): 02 Jul 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on July 6, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 26

1 2 3 4 5

Environmental Science & Technology

Date: June 5, 2018 (originally submitted April 16, 2018) Submitted to: Environmental Science & Technology

The Impact of Ohmic Resistance on Measured Electrode Potentials and Maximum Power Production in Microbial Fuel Cells

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

ABSTRACT

24

Low solution conductivity is known to adversely impact power generation in microbial fuel cells (MFCs),

25

but its impact on measured electrode potentials has often been neglected in the reporting of electrode

26

potentials. While errors in the working electrode (typically the anode) are usually small, larger errors can

27

result in reported counter electrode potentials (typically the cathode) due to large distances between

28

the reference and working electrodes, or the use of whole cell voltages to calculate counter electrode

29

potentials. As shown here, inaccurate electrode potentials impact conclusions concerning factors

30

limiting power production in MFCs at higher current densities. To demonstrate how the electrochemical

31

measurements should be adjusted using the solution conductivity, electrode potentials were estimated

32

in MFCs with brush anodes placed close to the cathode (1 cm), or with flat felt anodes placed further

33

from the cathode (3 cm) to avoid oxygen crossover to the anodes. The errors in the cathode potential

34

for MFCs with brush anodes reached 94 mV using acetate in a 50 mM phosphate buffer solution. With a

Bruce E. Logan1*, Emily Zikmund1, Wulin Yang1, Ruggero Rossi1, Kyoung-Yeol Kim1, Pascal Saikaly2, Fang Zhang3 1

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, 231Q Sackett Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA 2 Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division, Water Desalination and Reuse Research Center, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia 3 School of Environment and State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China *Corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected]; phone: +1-814-863-7908; fax: +1-814-863-7304

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

35

felt anode and acetate, cathode potential errors increased to 394 mV. While brush anode MFCs

36

produced much higher power densities than flat anode MFCs under these conditions, this better

37

performance was shown primarily to result from electrode spacing following correction of electrode

38

potentials. Brush anode potentials corrected for solution conductivity were the same for brushes set 1

39

or 3 cm from the cathode, although the range of current produced was different due to ohmic losses

40

with the larger distance. These results demonstrate the critical importance of using corrected electrode

41

potentials for to understand factors limiting power production in MFCs.

42 43

Introduction

44

Many different types of electrodes have been used in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) in order to try to

45

increase power production.1-9 Anodes such as graphite fiber brushes10 or highly porous carbon felt11, 12

46

produce higher power densities in MFCs due to their high surface areas and porosities. A comparison of

47

anode types based on reports in the literature showed that cylindrical brush anodes generally produced

48

higher current densities than flat carbon felt, carbon cloth and carbon paper anodes, when coupled to a

49

cathode with a platinum catalyst.3 Placing the electrodes close to each other should improve power

50

production as it reduces ohmic resistance. However, flat anodes cannot be placed close to the cathode

51

unless a separator or membrane is used to block oxygen transfer from the cathode to the anode, as

52

oxygen crossover reduces power production.13-18 In contrast, a brush anode can be placed close to the

53

cathode in the absence of a separator without an appreciable loss in power, as long as the brush is more

54

than ~1 cm thick.10, 19-22 The brush is quite thick relative to many felt or cloth anodes, which should

55

facilitate maintenance of anaerobic conditions within the brush. Removing up to 65% of a 2.5 cm long

56

brush on the side most distant from the cathode, so that the brush was only 0.9 cm thick, did not impact

57

power production suggesting that the portion of the anode closest to the cathode was important for

58

power production.19 Small diameter brushes (0.8 cm) have produced higher power densities than larger

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 26

Page 3 of 26

Environmental Science & Technology

59

brushes (2.5 cm diameter) when acetate concentrations were kept high (~ 1 g/L), but they have failed to

60

produce stable power with lower strength wastewater (