Subscriber access provided by UB + Fachbibliothek Chemie | (FU-Bibliothekssystem)
Article
Implications of fuel choice and burner settings for combustion efficiency and NOx formation in PF-fired iron ore rotary kilns Rikard Edland, Fredrik Normann, Christian Fredriksson, and Klas Andersson Energy Fuels, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b03205 • Publication Date (Web): 07 Feb 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on February 11, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Energy & Fuels is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
1
Implications of fuel choice and burner settings for
2
combustion efficiency and NOx formation in PF-
3
fired iron ore rotary kilns
4 5
Rikard Edland1*, Fredrik Normann1, Christian Fredriksson2, Klas Andersson1
6
1
7
University of Technology, SE-412 96, Göteborg
8
2
9
*Corresponding author, Tel. +46 31 722 1000.
[email protected] Division of Energy Technology, Department of Energy and Environment, Chalmers
LKAB, Box 952, SE-971 27 Luleå
10
ABSTRACT:
The combustion process applied in the grate-kiln process for iron ore pellet
11
production employs air-to-fuel equivalence ratios in the range of 4–6, typically with coal as
12
fuel and high-temperature air (>1000°C) as oxidant. The NOx emissions from these units are
13
in general significantly higher than those in other combustion systems and the large flows of
14
flue gases make the implementation of secondary measures for NOx control costly. Therefore,
15
it is of importance to investigate NOx formation under combustion conditions relevant for iron
16
ore production, in order to control the emissions from these units. The present work examines
17
NOx formation during the combustion of four pulverized coals, as well as during co-firing
18
with biomass in a pilot-scale kiln (580 kWfuel) based on a two-week experimental campaign.
19
The influence of burner settings was also included in the investigation. Based on the 1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 2 of 28
20
presented experimental results and the results of previous modelling and experimental studies,
21
we suggest that the NOx emissions are mainly the result of a high conversion of fuel-bound
22
nitrogen (fuel-N) to NO. In particular, char-bound nitrogen (char-N) conversion appears to be
23
higher than in conventional pulverized fuel flames, presumably due to the high levels of
24
oxygen present in the char-burnout region. The temperatures in the kiln varied between the
25
test cases, but thermal NO formation is estimated to be of low importance.
26
1. Introduction
27
Iron ore is typically processed into pellets for easy transportation and handling in steel
28
making. To achieve the high temperatures required for sintering the hematite (Fe2O3) (the
29
pellet temperature should be >1300°C1), a rotary kiln may be used in the so-called ‘grate-kiln
30
process’. The kiln is heated by a flame and large volumes of highly preheated air. In the
31
rotary kiln, the molar air-to-fuel equivalence ratio, λ, is in the range of 4–6, which is high
32
compared to conventional pulverized fuel (PF) burners with λ-values in the range of 1.2–1.5,
33
and the inlet air temperature is around 1000°C (300°C in conventional burners). The process
34
is dependent upon an efficient combustion process, so current operation is often restricted to a
35
specific coal or oil. However, with the increasing volatility of the fossil fuel market and
36
increasing concerns regarding global warming, fuel flexibility and increased use of biomass
37
are of interest. Increasingly stringent regulations designed to reduce NOx emissions have also
38
intensified the desire to mitigate NOx emissions from the iron ore industry. Due to the high-
39
volume flue gas flow from the process, secondary mitigation strategies are costly, so primary
40
measures are preferred. However, when modifying the combustion process it is critical to
41
consider the pellet-making process, given that the sintering of the pellets requires controlled
42
heat transfer conditions and the oxidization of magnetite to hematite requires a high oxygen
43
content in the flue gas. 2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 3 of 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
44
The combustion conditions in the kiln used for iron ore processing are thus considerably
45
different from those in conventional coal flames for heat and power generation, and it is
46
unclear how these conditions influence NOx formation. During the combustion of coal, the
47
main source of NOx is the nitrogen bound to the fuel (fuel-N), as long as the temperature is
48
kept low enough to avoid significant amounts of air-borne nitrogen to react with oxygen
49
(thermal NO formation). Although thermal NO may have some importance for solid fuel
50
combustion, fuel-NO usually contributes with at least 75% of the total NOx formation2. The
51
prompt NO mechanism, whereby hydrocarbon radicals attack the air-bound nitrogen, is
52
considered to play a negligible role in solid fuel combustion3. The properties of the fuel,
53
burner design, and combustion conditions are known to be important factors for controlling
54
NO formation. A simple way to reduce the NOx emissions is to change to a fuel with a lower
55
nitrogen content. In the flame or combustor, a reducing zone can be formed in which N2
56
formation is favored over NO formation. Such a zone may be created by staging the
57
combustion air, either externally or internally. Fuel-NO can further be divided into NO that is
58
formed from the nitrogen in the volatiles (vol-N) and NO that is formed from the nitrogen in
59
the char (char-N). It is mainly the conversion of vol-N that is reduced when air-staging is
60
applied. NO formation from vol-N is strongly dependent upon the local stoichiometry and
61
may reach levels from 10% to 100%4. While the conversion of char-N to NO has been
62
investigated in many studies, the results are complex. For single-particle experiments, char-N
63
conversion may be 100%, whereas when more particles are introduced (approaching a fixed
64
bed system) heterogeneous NO reduction becomes of importance and char-N conversion
65
decreases to around 50%5. Furthermore, the initial NO concentration has a strong influence on
66
the net NO formation during char burnout, in which a higher initial NO concentration
67
decreases the conversion of char-N to NO6, 7. Common NO/char-N ratios found in the
68
literature are in the range of 10%–30%2, 4, 8-10. While the importance of oxygen for char-N 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 4 of 28
69
conversion is debated, at high temperatures it appears that the conversion rate increases
70
significantly with increasing amounts of air2, 7, 11. The total conversion of fuel-N to NO is thus
71
mainly a reflection of how the fuel-N is distributed between volatiles and char and the local
72
stoichiometry during the release of vol-N and char-N, of which vol-N conversion is somewhat
73
easier to control. The nitrogen fraction in the volatiles increases with the pyrolysis
74
temperature and the oxygen content of the fuel3, 12. With local sub-stoichiometric conditions
75
(achieved through low levels of excess air, as well as controlled mixing), it is possible to have
76
a total fuel-N conversion of 2000°C29, 30) and the air-to-fuel
105
equivalence ratio is lower, which alters significantly the conditions for NO formation.
106
The present work is a technical-scale experimental investigation of the influences of fuel
107
characteristics and burner settings on the combustion process in general and on NOx
108
formation in particular. The aim is to characterize how the combustion process is affected by
109
a fuel change given the special conditions of iron ore processing, so as to be able to increase
110
fuel flexibility and enable the use of biofuels without risking the efficiency of the iron ore
111
process. We evaluate current combustion praxis (i.e., fuel characteristics, influences of λ-
112
values and preheating temperatures) for low-NOx combustion under conventional combustion
113
to conclude on its applicability to the conditions of iron ore processing.
114 115 116
2.1. Equipment and fuels
117
The kiln is a pilot-scale version of a 40-MWfuel rotary kiln used for iron ore processing. The
118
pilot kiln is designed to explore the features of the combustion process, i.e., the product
2. Experimental
The present investigation was performed with the LKAB test kiln (580 kWfuel) (Figure 1).
5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 6 of 28
119
stream and the rotation of the kiln are not included. The combustion process is not adiabatic.
120
The burner hood (prior to the kiln inlet) and the first 4 m are scaled with regard to the full
121
scale kiln using constant velocity scaling. The diameter of the scaled kiln part is 0.65 m. The
122
total length of the test facility is 14 m in order to provide further measurement possibilities,
123
e.g. ash extraction. Measurement ports are located along the unit (marked as MH0-MH12 in
124
Figure 1). The burner has six registers (Figure 2), which are denoted N1–N6. Combustion air
125
enters at N1 and N4, while the remaining registers are fuel registers. The air that enters at N4
126
is swirled at an angle of 30°, so it is termed ‘swirl air’, while the air that enters N1 is called
127
‘axial air’. The burner is placed in the center with large volumes of highly preheated air being
128
introduced at two large inlets located above and below the burner (Figure 3). This air will be
129
referred to as ‘secondary air’, and the air flows in the burner (N1, N4 and fuel transport air)
130
will be referred to as ‘primary air’. The key combustion settings are listed in Table 1.
131
Measurements of CO2, CO, NO, NO2, O2, and SO2 were performed at the kiln outlet. The
132
levels of CO, CO2 and SO2 were measured by NDIR (ABB URAS), O2 by paramagnetism
133
(ABB MAGNUS), and NO and NO2 by NDUV (ABB LIMAS). In-flame gas measurements
134
were performed with a filter-equipped cooled probe connected to an FTIR-system (MKS
135
Multigas 2030) and a paramagnetic O2-measuring instrument (Maihak SIDOR). It is
136
estimated that the gas experienced instantaneous quenching due to the excessive cooling in
137
the probe. The probe was traversed horizontally in the kiln at four ports (MH0, MH1, MH3,
138
and MH7 in Figure 1). Seven radial measurement positions were used for each port to map
139
the radial concentration profiles. The central position was not included for MH0 due to the
140
high density of the fuel particles and potential interference with the flame. Temperature
141
measurements were performed using a suction pyrometer with a thermocouple type B at the
142
same locations as the gas measurements. The thermocouple was protected by two ceramic
143
housings, so as to minimize the effects of radiation, and mounted on the tip of a water-cooled 6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
144
probe with a central pipe connected to an ejector, which provided the required suction
145
velocity.
146
Four pulverized coals and two types of biomass were used. Biomass A was a pulverized
147
wood treated with steam explosion, and Biomass B was an untreated but pulverized mixture
148
of fir and pine. The coals were pulverized in a roller mill to the size distribution of a full-scale
149
process. The biomass was instead treated in a hammer mill due to technical constraints of
150
roller mills with respect to the fibers in biomass (it might have been possible to mill Biomass
151
A in the roller mill but this was not tested). During the milling process, the biomass pellets
152
were partly pulverized into their original particle size (prior to pelletization), which was
153
smaller for Biomass A than for Biomass B. The size of the biomass particles was larger than
154
the coals but probably smaller than they would have been in a full scale process. The fuel
155
compositions and volume weighted mean diameter of the particle distribution are presented in
156
Table 2. The fuels were introduced through register N6 during the coal firing. Co-firing of
157
coal and biomass was performed with the burner inserted 220 mm into the kiln and with the
158
coal fed through register N3 and biomass fed through register N2. This was done in order to
159
represent two different burner types seen in full scale. The biomass provided 30% of the total
160
fuel energy input, which corresponded to approximately 40% on a mass basis.
161
For comparison, the outlet NOx concentration is presented as ppm NOx corrected to 6% O2
162
and is calculated according to Eq. (1). The actual outlet concentration was around 15-16% in
163
all cases, which is somewhat lower than the theoretically calculated concentration of 16%
164
(Table 3). Considering the flows that need to be taken into account (secondary and primary air
165
flows as well as the fuel feeding rate), this is an acceptable discrepancy. The ratio of NOx
166
emissions to fuel-N (ߟே ) is calculated according to Eq. (2). This value is equal to or higher
167
than the actual conversion ratio depending on the contribution from the thermal-NO formation
168
from the air born nitrogen. 7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
169
ݔேைೣ ሺ6%ܱଶ ሻ = ሺݔேை + ݔேைమ ሻ ∗
170
ߟே =
.ଶଽି. .ଶଽି௫ೀమ
൫௫ಿೀ ା௫ಿೀమ ൯ሶೠ ቀ బ ቁ
ሶೠ ௬ಿ /ெಿ
బ ೃ
Page 8 of 28
Eq. (1)
Eq. (2)
171
Where:
172
ݔ
173
ሶ = volumetric flue gas flow (in m3n/h) ܸ௨
174
= normal pressure (101.3 kPa)
175
ܶ
= normal temperature (273.15 K)
176
R
= 8314
177
݉ሶ௨ = fuel mass flow (in kg/h)
178
ݕே
= mass fraction nitrogen in the fuel
179
ܯே
= molar mass of nitrogen (14 kmol/kg)
= fraction of component i
180 181
2.2 Fuel test cases
182
into two sections, one for the coal comparison and one for the biomass co-firing. The
183
secondary air temperatures varied somewhat during the experiments and the measured values
184
are displayed in one of the columns.
185 186
2.3 Parameter study
187
involved changing the primary air flow and observing the outlet NOx concentration, although
188
flame measurements were performed on one occasion where the total amount of primary air
189
was significantly lower. The influence of the air-to-fuel equivalence ratio, λ, on the
190
concentration of NOx was investigated by decreasing the oxygen content of the secondary air
191
flow. The effect of secondary air temperature was also examined. Table 4 provides an
192
overview of the ranges and settings for the investigated parameters.
Table 3 presents the combustion settings for each of the different fuels. The table is divided
A study of how the air flows influence NOx emissions was carried out. These tests mainly
8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
193 194
This chapter presents the measurements from the experimental campaign. The results are
195
discussed and interpreted with respect to implications on combustion and NOx formation in
196
direct connection to the results.
197 198
3.1 Coal comparison
199
are presented in Figure 4 in the form of interpolated contour maps, in which the white fields
200
correspond to areas where measurements were not performed due to technical issues.
201
Temperatures of >1500°C were reached for Coal D and >1600°C for Coal C, while the peak
202
temperatures were significantly lower for Coal A and Coal B. The O2 concentrations were
203
high throughout the flame and the CO concentrations were relatively low (usually 2%) relative to the
207
other coals and since it is unlikely that the levels of O2 and CO would be high simultaneously,
208
the O2 levels for Coal C are assumed to be lower than those for the other coals.
3. Results and discussion
The in-flame measurements of temperature and selected gas components for the coal tests
209
It is clear that the oxygen-lean zone in front of the burner is negligible for any of the three
210
coals with O2 data. This means that there is a potential to enhance burner design to decrease
211
mainly the vol-N conversion to NO. From the NO maps, it appears that the concentrations are
212
higher further into the kiln for Coal B than for the other coals, and that the highest
213
concentration is measured for Coal C, although this concentration drops to levels similar to
214
those for Coal A shortly afterwards. NH3 was generally present at around 0–20 ppm, and is
215
therefore not presented; however, an ammonia peak at 200 ppm was observed in the central
216
position in MH1 for Coal C.
217
Figure 5 presents the NOx conversion for each coal. With the exception of small variations
218
in the secondary air temperature, burner settings were kept constant when testing the four 9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 10 of 28
219
coals. Coal A generated the lowest NOx emissions and Coal B the highest emissions. As
220
anticipated, the level of NOx formation correlates with the amount of fuel-bound nitrogen in
221
the coals. An exception to this is Coal C, which exhibits a comparatively low fuel-N to NOx
222
conversion. However, Coal C has a high volatile content relative to the other coals, which
223
according to literature12 favours a low conversion of fuel-N to NOx (ߟே ). From Figure 6, it
224
can further be seen that the fuel-N to NOx conversion correlates well with the inverse volatiles
225
content.
226
The relative importance of fuel-nitrogen and volatile content is, however, case-specific and
227
difficult to predict without experimentation. Other factors, such as how the nitrogen is bound
228
in the fuel and local temperature profiles, will obviously also affect the formation of NOx in
229
the grate-kiln flames, which, taken together, makes modelling predictions uncertain. Full-
230
scale experiments are thus of great interest for future studies.
231
Although the NOx emissions correlate well with the fuel characteristics, they are
232
substantially higher than the levels seen in conventional PF flames. As a reference point,
233
using the best available technology (BAT) for large combustion plants gives emissions around
234
45-150 ppm (corrected to 6% O2) for pulverized coal using combined primary reduction
235
measures31. Although certain primary measures are not applicable to rotary kilns - due to the
236
rotation - significant improvements should be possible. The emissions seen in the test kiln are
237
also somewhat higher than the ones typically observed in full scale. The high level of
238
emissions (>1000 ppm at 6% O2) may be explained by either higher conversion of the volatile
239
nitrogen or the char-bound nitrogen to NO or thermal NO formation. Thermal NO formation
240
is dependent on O, N, and OH radicals, and is therefore coupled to the fuel combustion,
241
although decoupling is common due to the slower kinetics of thermal-NO formation. To get
242
an estimation of the thermal NO contribution, the nitrogen mechanism by Glarborg and
243
Mendiara32 was used to determine the NO-formation from N2 and O2 at 1700°C, i.e. 100°C 10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11 of 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
244
above the highest temperature measured during the campaign. Based on the measurements,
245
the high-temperature zone can, as a rough estimate, be assumed cylindrical with a diameter of
246
0.3m and a length of 1m (i.e. a volume of 0.07 m3). In this case, with a constant temperature
247
profile of 1700°C, the thermal NO formation rate becomes 0.0005 mole/s. This should be
248
compared to the total outlet NOx flow, which was about 0.015 mole/s in the case with the
249
highest temperature (Coal C). Thus, according to these rough calculations, the thermal NO
250
formation contributes with maximum 3% of the total NOx emissions.
251
In summary, vol-N conversion to NO appears to be high due to the high oxygen fraction in
252
the proximity of the burner outlet. Furthermore, char-N conversion is likely to be higher than
253
is usually seen in conventional combustion, since the high level of excess air leads to a high
254
level of oxygen in the char-burnout zone. The way in which the secondary air is added
255
probably inhibits external recirculation zones, which further promotes an oxidizing
256
environment.
257 258
3.2 Biomass co-firing
259
reference case with Coal A (all three cases used similar burner settings, see Table 3). Overall,
260
the temperature and concentration maps resemble each other, which means that substituting
261
30% of the coal energy with biomass does not appear to affect significantly (i.e. relative to
262
differences between coals and the requirements of the iron ore pelletization) the combustion
263
process. The oxygen levels were relatively high throughout the kiln for all three cases,
264
although slightly lower levels were found for the co-firing case with Biomass A, which also
265
exhibited a higher CO concentration. The zone with lower oxygen concentration was only
266
slightly longer for the biomass cases, although the diameters of the biomass particles are
267
substantially larger than those of the coal particles and the former are likely to burn later
Figure 7 presents the flame measurements for the two co-firing cases, as compared to a
11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
268
within the kiln. The temperatures measured during these experiments never reached more than
269
1500°C, and thermal NO formation was presumably negligible.
270
Figure 8 presents the NOx emissions and ߟே values for the coal plus biomass co-firing
271
cases. Co-firing coal and biomass emitted less NOx than when coal was fired alone, as
272
expected since the biomass have lower nitrogen content. The reduction in NOx emissions due
273
to co-firing (23% relative to Coal A) is of the same magnitude as the reduction in coal flow
274
(30%) in the co-firing cases. This indicates that the reduction in NOx is primarily an effect of
275
reducing the incoming fuel nitrogen, and that there are no significant effects on NO formation
276
owing to interactions between the coal and biomass. The NOx/fuel-N ratios are slightly higher
277
for the biomass cases, which may reflect the fact that the added transport air required for
278
biomass feeding (Table 3) augments the early oxidizing environment for nitrogen released
279
with the volatiles.
280
Since the NO maps in Figure 7 are strikingly similar, and the case without biomass has
281
significantly higher NOx emissions (Figure 8), it is likely that a substantial share of NO is
282
formed from char-N in the coal particles after the last measurement port (MH7). Assuming
283
that the velocity of a coal particle is constant at 9 m/s (the speed of the secondary air), it
284
would take about 240 ms for it to reach MH7, which may be insufficient for complete
285
burnout.
286 287
3.3 Parameter study
288
combustion settings on the combustion process and NO formation.
289 290
The parameter study represents an investigation of the influences of the different
3.3.1 Primary air flow
The influence of different primary air flows in the burner on NOx emissions was
291
investigated by altering the swirl, axial, and transport air flows. It was found that the levels of
292
NOx correlated more with the total amount of primary air (see Figure 9) than with specific
293
swirl/flow settings. The results from the coal experiments are consistent with the finding of 12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 28
Page 13 of 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
294
Vaccaro24 that the levels of NOx in rotary kilns decrease with decreasing primary air flow.
295
However, the cases with biomass co-firing showed the opposite trend, albeit much more
296
weakly than for the coals.
297
In-flame measurements were performed for one case in which the primary air flow was low,
298
and it is compared to the reference case with Coal A (same as Coal A in Figure 4), in which
299
the primary air flow was high. These two data-points are marked in red in Figure 9, and the
300
specific flame measurements are shown in Figure 10. The measured oxygen concentration
301
right in front of the burner is lower and the CO concentration is higher when the primary air
302
flow is low. Thus, the change in primary air flow has affected the flame and created a
303
reducing zone at the flame root. This flame type should produce less NO, which is in line with
304
the observation that NOx emissions are decreased from 1230 ppm to 930 ppm. We propose
305
that a decrease in vol-N conversion to NO is the most important factor, since less oxygen is
306
available during the release of volatiles. The temperatures are significantly higher when the
307
primary air flow is low, although this does not appear to contribute to any significant level of
308
thermal NO formation.
309 310
3.3.2 Secondary air flow
One of the most pronounced differences between combustion in rotary kilns for iron ore
311
processing and conventional PF combustion units (i.e., those used mainly for utility purposes)
312
is the amount of oxygen that is present during the process. To correlate the increased presence
313
of oxygen to NO formation, parts of the secondary air flow were replaced with a nitrogen
314
flow during one test sequence. Figure 11 shows how the ߟே value relates to the total
315
stoichiometric ratio of oxygen to fuel. The conversion of fuel-bound nitrogen to NO is
316
decreased from around 0.67 at λ=4.2 to around 0.59 at λ=2.8. As expected, the decreased
317
oxygen-to-fuel ratio leads to lower NOx emissions. The reason for this is that less oxygen is
318
available for both vol-N and char-N oxidation. The decrease in NOx emissions is, however, 13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 14 of 28
319
limited at these levels of excess air, as decreasing the oxygen supply by roughly 30% reduces
320
NOx formation by about 10%. The effect of decreased λ is expected to be significant first
321
when it approaches unity. Such low levels of oxygen are not feasible in rotary kilns for iron
322
ore processing, since oxygen is required to oxidize the product, i.e., in addition to being
323
needed for fuel oxidation.
324 325
3.3.3 Secondary air temperature
326
and the air flow in the upper inlet is on average about 40°C warmer than the air flow in the
327
lower inlet, due to differences in heat loss. The influence of air temperature on NOx emissions
328
was examined by raising the temperatures of the two air flows by about 80°C when Coal A
329
was combusted with low amounts of primary air. The result is displayed in Figure 12. The
330
level of NOx was not affected to a significant degree. If anything, the levels of NOx emissions
331
decreased during the course of the temperature increase. This supports the earlier assessment
332
of the weak importance of thermal NO formation, since the thermal-NO mechanism is
333
sensitive to temperature changes once activated.
The secondary air enters the rotary kiln at inlets above and below the fuel inlet (Figure 3),
334 335
This work analyzes at the implications of fuel choice and burner settings for combustion
336
efficiency and NOx formation in PF-fired rotary kilns used for iron ore production. Four coals
337
and two biomass co-firing cases were assessed. In general, the NOx emissions were
338
substantially higher than those usually detected for pulverized fuel flames. The main reason
339
for this is a high conversion of fuel-N to NO, as the importance of thermal NO is estimated to
340
be limited or even negligible. We show that the primary air flows in the burner have a
341
significant effect on the flame and that low primary air flows lead to a flame with an oxygen-
342
lean zone in front of the burner, thereby decreasing the conversion of volatile nitrogen. The
343
lowest measured NOx emission for such a flame was 900 ppm (corrected to 6% O2), which is
4. Conclusions
14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 15 of 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
344
still exceptionally high. NO that originates from the char is anticipated to be the main
345
contributor to NOx in the studied burner configuration. When the amount of excess air is
346
decreased the NOx emissions are reduced, although this is not expected to be feasible in a full-
347
scale setup due to the importance of oxygen with respect to the product quality. Co-firing coal
348
with biomass reduces the NOx emissions, mainly as a result of the lower nitrogen content in
349
the biomass. Thus, in order to reduce NOx emissions using primary measures in iron ore
350
production rotary kilns, the choice of fuel is critical. An appropriate choice is a fuel with low
351
nitrogen content and high volatile content need to be assessed carefully. If the chosen fuel
352
combusts efficiently with low amounts of primary air, this will facilitate more stringent
353
control of both the thermal and fuel-related reactions routes.
354
Acknowledgment
355
This work was financed by LKAB and the Swedish Energy Agency.
356
Figures
357 358
Figure 1. The test kiln viewed from the side. MH0–MH12 indicate the measurement ports.
359
The distances are given in mm.
15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 16 of 28
360 361
Figure 2. Schematic of the burner orifice. The registers are denoted N1–N6. N4 is the swirl
362
air register and N1 is the axial air register. The other registers (white) are for fuel feeding.
363 364 365
Figure
3.
Cross-sectional
view
of
the
test
kiln
inlet.
16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 17 of 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
Energy & Fuels
Figure 4. Contour maps created by interpolation between measurement points for each test coal. The y-axis in each figure reflects a distance of 0 mm to 650 mm and the black dots represent the measurement points. Blank regions represent sites where no measurements were performed 17
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 18 of 28
Figure 5. Nitrogen contents and NOx concentrations for each of the four test coals.
18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 19 of 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
Figure 6. Ratio of outlet NOx to inlet nitrogen plotted against the percentage of volatile matter for each of the four fuels.
19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
Page 20 of 28
Figure 7. Contour maps created by interpolation between measurement points for the three cases. The black dots represent measurement points.
20
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 21 of 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
Figure 8. NOx emission levels and conversion ratios of outlet NOx to inlet nitrogen (ߟே ) for the coal- and biomass-firing cases.
Figure 9. NOx emissions for cases of combustion with different amounts of primary air. 21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 22 of 28
22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 23 of 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
Energy & Fuels
Figure 10. Contour maps created by interpolation between measurement points for the two cases. The black dots represent measurement points 23
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 24 of 28
Figure 11. Nitrogen to NOx conversion as a function of global stoichiometry. Coal B was used as fuel and the primary air flow was 60 m3n/h.
Figure 12. Effects of secondary air temperature on concentrations of NOx in a rotary kiln. Coal A was used as fuel and the primary air flow was 60 m3n/h.
24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 25 of 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
Tables
Table 1. Operating conditions of the LKAB test kiln Fuel input
580 kW
Primary air flow
60–200 m3n/h
Primary air temperature
20°C
Secondary air flow
≈2250 m3n/h
Secondary air temperature
950°–1050°C
Total λ
4–5
Primary air λ
0.24–0.45
Table 2. Compositions and properties of the fuels used. Parameter Unit
Coal A
Coal B
Coal C
Coal D
Biomass A
Biomass B
LHV
MJ/kg, dry
29.7
31.2
28.5
26.7
20.3
19.2
H2 O
Mass-%
0.9
1.3
1.5
2
4.4
7.8
Ash
Mass-% dry
13.3
8.4
9.2
15.2
1.1
0.37
Volatiles
Mass-% dry
21.6
22.6
36.5
26.9
76.2
83.9
C
Mass-% dry
76.1
79.8
72.1
69.6
52.9
50.8
H
Mass-% dry
3.9
3.8
4.7
3.5
5.8
6.2
N
Mass-% dry
1.38
2.09
2.35
1.77
0.11
0.1
O
Mass-% dry
5.1
5.7
11.2
9.4
40
42.5
Diameter
µm (average)
43
44
47
46
210
443
LHV, Lower heating value.
25 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 26 of 28
Table 3. Combustion settings for the different fuels used. The air flows are set values and not actual averages.
Fuel(s)
Register
Secondary Axial air T [°C] air flow [m3n/h]
Swirl air flow [m3n/h]
Transport Total λ gas flow (calculated [m3n/h] O2% out)
Coal A
N6
990
60
70
10 (N2)
4.4 (16.1%)
Coal B
N6
965
60
70
10 (N2)
4.5 (16.1%)
Coal C
N6
995
60
70
10 (N2)
4.5 (16.0%)
Coal D
N6
1000
60
70
10 (N2)
4.5 (16.0%)
Coal A
N3
1015
45
30
100 (Air)
4.5 (16.2%)
Coal A + Bio A
N3 + N2
1020
30
30
140 (Air)
4.6 (16.2%)
Coal A + Bio B
N3 + N2
1020
30
30
140 (Air)
4.5 (16.1%)
Table 4. Combustion settings used during the parameter study Investigated parameter
Test range
Primary air
Global stoichiometry
Secondary air temperature
Fuel used
Primary air
60-240 m3n/h
-
≈ 4.5
1050°C
Mixed
Global stoichiometry
2.8-4.2
60 m3n/h
-
1050°C
Coal B
Secondary air temperature
940-1050 °C
60 m3n/h
4.3
-
Coal A
1. Thurlby, J., A dynamic mathematical model of the complete grate/kiln iron–ore pellet induration process. Metallurgical Transactions B 1988, 19, (1), 103-112. 2. Pershing, D.; Wendt, J. In Pulverized coal combustion: The influence of flame temperature and coal composition on thermal and fuel NOx, Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1977; Elsevier: 1977; pp 389-399. 3. Glarborg, P., Fuel nitrogen conversion in solid fuel fired systems. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 2002, 19, (2), 89-113. 4. Pohl, J. H.; Sarofim, A. F. In Devolatilization and oxidation of coal nitrogen, Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1977; Elsevier: 1977; pp 491-501.
26 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 27 of 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
5. Jensen, L. S.; Jannerup, H. E.; Glarborg, P.; Jensen, A.; Dam-Johansen, K., Experimental investigation of no from pulverized char combustion. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 2000, 28, (2), 2271-2278. 6. Coda, B.; Kluger, F.; Förtsch, D.; Spliethoff, H.; Hein, K.; Tognotti, L., Coal-nitrogen release and NOx evolution in air-staged combustion. Energy & fuels 1998, 12, (6), 1322-1327. 7. Spinti, J. P.; Pershing, D. W., The fate of char-N at pulverized coal conditions. Combustion and Flame 2003, 135, (3), 299-313. 8. Pershing, D.; Wendt, J., Relative contributions of volatile nitrogen and char nitrogen to NOx emissions from pulverized coal flames. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development 1979, 18, (1), 60-67. 9. Song, Y. H.; Pohl, J. H.; Beér, J. M.; Sarofim, A. F., Nitric oxide formation during pulverized coal combustion. Combustion science and technology 1982, 28, (1-2), 31-40. 10. Thomas, K. M., The release of nitrogen oxides during char combustion. Fuel 1997, 76, (6), 457-473. 11. Nelson, P. F.; Nancarrow, P. C.; Bus, J.; Prokopiuk, A., Fractional conversion of char N to NO in an entrained flow reactor. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 2002, 29, (2), 2267-2274. 12. van der Lans, R. P.; Glarborg, P.; Dam-Johansen, K., Influence of process parameters on nitrogen oxide formation in pulverized coal burners. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 1997, 23, (4), 349-377. 13. Harding, N.; Smoot, L. D.; Hedman, P. O., Nitrogen pollutant formation in a pulverized coal combustor: effect of secondary stream swirl. AIChE Journal 1982, 28, (4), 573-580. 14. Wang, W.; Brown, S. D.; Thomas, K. M.; Crelling, J. C., Nitrogen release from a rank series of coals during temperature programmed combustion. Fuel 1994, 73, (3), 341-347. 15. Harding, A.; Brown, S.; Thomas, K., Release of NO from the combustion of coal chars. Combustion and Flame 1996, 107, (4), 336-350. 16. Wendt, J. O.; Sternling, C.; Matovich, M. In Reduction of sulfur trioxide and nitrogen oxides by secondary fuel injection, Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1973; Elsevier: 1973; pp 897-904. 17. Smoot, L. D.; Hill, S. C.; Xu, H., NOx control through reburning1. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 1998, 24, (5), 385-408. 18. Kühnemuth, D.; Normann, F.; Andersson, K.; Johnsson, F.; Leckner, B., Reburning of Nitric Oxide in Oxy-Fuel Firing, The Influence of Combustion Conditions. Energy & Fuels 2011, 25, (2), 624-631. 19. Dean, A. M.; Bozzelli, J. W., Combustion chemistry of nitrogen. In Gas-phase combustion chemistry, Springer: 2000; pp 125-341. 20. Normann, F.; Andersson, K.; Leckner, B.; Johnsson, F., Emission control of nitrogen oxides in the oxy-fuel process. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 2009, 35, (5), 385-397. 21. Davis, R. A., Nitric oxide formation in an iron oxide pellet rotary kiln furnace. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 1998, 48, (1), 44-51. 22. Zahl, R. K.; Haas, L. A.; Engesser, J. Formation of NOx in iron oxide pelletizing furnaces; University of Minnesota: 1995. 23. Edland, R.; Normann, F.; Andersson, K.; Fredriksson, C. In Formation of nitrogen oxides in rotary kiln burners: an assessment of pilot scale experiments using gaseous, liquid and solid fuels, INFUB 2015, 2015; 2015. 24. Vaccaro, M. H. In Low NOx rotary kiln burner technology: design principles & case study, Cement Industry Technical Confernece, 2002. IEEE-IAS/PCA 44th, 2002; IEEE: 2002; pp 265270. 25. Nielsen, P.; Jepsen, O. In An overview of the formation of SOx and NOx in various pyroprocessing systems, Cement Industry Technical Conference, 1990., XXXII, Record of Conference Papers., IEEE, 1990; IEEE: 1990; pp 255-276. 26. Nathan, G. J.; Manias, C. G., The role of process and flame interaction in reducing NOx emissions. In The Institute of Energy's Second International Conference on Combustion & Emissions Control, Energy, T. I. o., Ed. Pergamon: 1995; pp 309-318.
27 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 28 of 28
27. Boateng, A. A., Rotary kilns: transport phenomena and transport processes. Butterworth-Heinemann: 2011. 28. Remus, R. Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for Iron and Steel Production: Industrial Emissions Directive 2010/75/EU Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control; 9279264753; Publications Office: 2013. 29. Mullinger, P. J. J., B. G. , NOx Reduction Techniques for Rotary Kilns American Flame Research Committee, Maui, Hawaii, October 16-20, 1994 1994. 30. Karstensen, K. H., Formation, release and control of dioxins in cement kilns. Chemosphere 2008, 70, (4), 543-560. 31. Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for Large Combustion Plants; JRC, The European Comission's science and knowledge service: 2006. 32. Mendiara, T.; Glarborg, P., Ammonia chemistry in oxy-fuel combustion of methane. Combustion and Flame 2009, 156, (10), 1937-1949.
28 ACS Paragon Plus Environment