Importance of a Nanoscience Approach in the Understanding of Major

Feb 17, 2015 - and Michael F. Hochella*. ,†. †. The Center for NanoBioEarth, Department of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061,...
0 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
Subscriber access provided by UCF Libraries

Article

The Importance of a Nanoscience Approach in the Understanding of Major Aqueous Contamination Scenarios: A Case Study from a Recent Coal Ash Spill Yi Yang, Benjamin P. Colman, Emily S Bernhardt, and Michael F. Hochella Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/es505662q • Publication Date (Web): 17 Feb 2015 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on February 18, 2015

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 22

Environmental Science & Technology

1

The Importance of a Nanoscience Approach in the Understanding of Major

2

Aqueous Contamination Scenarios: A Case Study from a Recent Coal Ash

3

Spill

4

Yi Yang a,c,d*, Benjamin P. Colman b,d, Emily S. Bernhardt b,d, Michael F. Hochella, Jr.a*

5

a

6

24061, USA

7

b

Biology Department, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA

8

c

Department of Geosciences, East China Normal University, 3663 North Zhongshan Road,

9

Shanghai, 200062, China

The Center for NanoBioEarth, Department of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA

10

d

11

Durham, NC, 27517, USA

12

Corresponding authors: [email protected] (Y. Yang); [email protected] (M. F. Hochella,

13

Jr.)

14

TOC

Center for the Environmental Implications of NanoTechnology (CEINT), Duke University,

15 16

17 1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

18

Abstract

19

A coal ash spill that occurred from an ash impoundment pond into the Dan River, North Carolina,

20

provided a unique opportunity to study the significance and role of naturally-occurring and

21

incidental nanomaterials associated with contaminant distribution from a large-scale, acute

22

aquatic contamination event. Besides traditional measurements of bulk watercolumn and

23

sediment metal concentrations, the nanoparticle (NP) analyses are based on cross-flow

24

ultrafiltration (CFUF) and advanced transmission electron microscopy (TEM) techniques. A

25

drain pipe fed by coal ash impoundment seepage showed a high level of arsenic, with

26

concentrations many times over the EPA limit. The majority of the arsenic was found sorbed to

27

large aggregates dominated by incidental iron oxyhydroxide (ferrihydrite) NPs, while the

28

remainder of the arsenic was truly dissolved. These ferrihydrites were probably formed in situ

29

where Fe(II) was leached through subsurface flowpaths into an aerobic environment, and further

30

act as a significant contributor to the elevated As concentrations in downstream sediments after

31

the spill. In addition, we discovered and describe a photocatalytic nano-TiO2 phase (anatase)

32

present in the coal ash impacted river water that was also carrying/transporting transition metals

33

(Cu, Fe), which may also have environmental consequences.

34 35 36

Introduction

37

It is becoming increasing apparent that naturally occurring and anthropogenic incidental

38

nanomaterials play an important and often completely overlooked role in regulating the behavior

39

of contaminants in complex aquatic systems. This statement is applicable to both manmade

40

aquatic systems, such as nanomaterials in water treatment plants and distribution systems,1-3 and 2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 22

Page 3 of 22

Environmental Science & Technology

41

natural aquatic systems, such as rivers and ground water.4-7 What has been generally missing is

42

an example of a major, acute aqueous contaminant spill where the central role of naturally

43

occurring and incidental nanomaterials has been clearly delineated. Our opportunity to study this

44

underrepresented type of impact in a major aqueous contamination scenario came in February of

45

2014 during a coal ash spill into the Dan River near the town of Eden, North Carolina. Although

46

this spill was considerably smaller than previously studied coal ash spills in the North

47

Carolina/Tennessee areas, 8, 9 it was still a major event. The resulting flow of ash and water was

48

estimated to contain 27 million gallons of water and 30,000 to 39,000 tons of coal ash flowing

49

into the Dan River from February 2nd to the 8th, 2014, when the leak was finally and successfully

50

capped.10

51

Coal combustion residues (CCRs) can cause elevated concentrations of toxic metals in surface

52

water (streams, rivers, and lakes), and potentially in ground water.11,12 Previous studies of coal

53

ash spills have documented long-term chemical impacts that may result in long-term

54

environmental and health impacts on these aquatic systems.9,12 There has been limited research

55

on these long-term impacts, however a recent study concluded that the amount of toxic metal

56

released from coal ash and its further mobility in an aquatic system are considered the key

57

factors that control the environmental risk.8

58

While regulations in the United States for many contaminants commonly found in ash spills

59

are based on total concentrations, studies on water quality and pollutants following coal ash

60

spills often differentiate between solid particulate matter (SPM) and dissolved materials by

61

separating them using membrane filters (e.g. having a pore size of 0.45 µm). In fact, the

62

“dissolved” phase present in the filtrate of natural waters is a complex mixture including a range

63

of sizes of colloids, nanoparticles (NPs), and the truly dissolved phase.13,14 In the last several

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

64

years, growing attention has been given to NPs due to their inherent reactivity with contaminants

65

and their implications for contaminant mobility.15,16 These NPs can be transported for long

66

distances and serve as carriers for contaminants that may significantly alter their fate and

67

transport relative to standard geochemical assumptions, calculations, and models.

68

In order to systematically assess the role of NPs associated with toxic metals in a major

69

aqueous contamination scenario, water samples from the Dan River and two inflows to the Dan

70

River from the coal ash impoundment areas were sequentially separated using cross-flow

71

ultrafiltration (CFUF) into > 0.45 µm, 0.45 um fractions were acid digested

123

according to Standard Method 3030F.18 This method is satisfactory for most metals but is

124

inefficient for titanium oxides, which are insoluble even under strong acidic condition. Sediment

125

samples were acid digested in duplicates following EPA Method 3050B. Major and trace

126

element concentrations were analyzed using a Thermo Electron X-Series inductively coupled

127

plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) per Standard Method 3125-B.18

128

Electron Microscopy Analysis. Sediment and the retentate of the > 0.45 um fraction of

129

inflow samples were investigated using an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope (ESEM,

130

FEI Quanta 600 FEG) equipped with an Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectrometer (EDS,

131

QUANTAX 400, Bruker). Selected colloidal solution samples were placed onto a 300 mesh

132

copper TEM grad with lacey carbon support film (Electron Microscopy Sciences, PA).

6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 22

Page 7 of 22

Environmental Science & Technology

133

Morphology, aggregation, chemistry and crystal structure of the NPs in the colloidal solution

134

(1kD-0.45µm fraction) were investigated using a JEM 2100 TEM/STEM (JEOL Corporation)

135

operating at 200 kV and equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometer. Electron

136

diffraction patterns of the crystalline and semi-crystalline phases were recorded in selected area

137

electron diffraction (SAED) mode.

138

XRD. The SPM suspension from Inflow A was pipetted onto a zero background sample

139

holder and analyzed by a Rigaku MiniFlex x-ray diffractometer (Ni-filtered Cu Kα radiation,

140

scanned between 10° and 80° 2θ at a scan rate of 0.02° 2θ s-1). All raw data files were converted

141

to an Excel file from which the relative intensity was plotted versus 2θ.

142 143

Results and Discussion

144

The highest concentrations of contaminants in water samples associated with CCR were

145

measured not at the site of the spill, but from the two inflows which enter the Dan River both

146

upstream (Inflow A) and downstream (Inflow B) of the ash containment basins. Concentrations

147

in < 0.45 µm water of Na, S, Al, Cr, Mn, Co, As, Sr, and Mo were all significantly higher in both

148

inflows than in any of the sampling locations within the Dan River (Table S2, t-test, p < 0.05).

149

For both inflows we found that the majority of the trace metals were in the