Importance of Terminal Amino Acid Residues to the Transport of

Aug 16, 2017 - College of Food Science and Engineering, Bohai University, Jinzhou, Liaoning 121013, People,s Republic of China. ABSTRACT: The objectiv...
0 downloads 0 Views 478KB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE LIBRARIES

Article

Importance of Terminal Amino Acid Residues to the Transport of Oligopeptides across Caco-2 Cell Monolayer Long Ding, Liying Wang, Zhipeng Yu, Sitong Ma, Zhiyang Du, Ting Zhang, and Jingbo Liu J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b03450 • Publication Date (Web): 16 Aug 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on August 17, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

Importance of Terminal Amino Acid Residues to the Transport of Oligopeptides

2

across Caco-2 Cell Monolayer

3

Long Ding†, Liying Wang†, Zhipeng Yu‡, Sitong Ma†, Zhiyang Du†, Ting Zhang†,

4

Jingbo Liu†*

5



6

China

7



8

China

College of Food Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130062, P.R.

College of Food Science and Engineering, Bohai University, Jinzhou 121013, P.R.

9 10

Running title: Terminal Amino Acid Residues and Transport of Oligopeptides

11 12

*Corresponding author: Tel.: +86 431 87836351. Fax: +86 431 87836391. E-mail:

13

[email protected].

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

14

ABSTRACT: The objective of this paper was to investigate the effects of terminal

15

amino acids on the transport of oligopeptides across Caco-2 cell monolayer. Ala-based

16

tetra- and penta-peptides were designed and the N-terminal or C-terminal amino acid

17

residues were replaced by different amino acids. The results showed that the

18

oligopeptides had a wide range of transport permeability across Caco-2 cell

19

monolayer and could be divided into 4 categories: non/poor permeability, low

20

permeability, intermediate permeability, and good permeability. Tetrapeptides with

21

N-terminal Leu, Pro, Ile, Cys, Met, Val or C-terminal Val showed the highest

22

permeability with apparent permeability coefficient (Papp) values over 10×10-6 cm/s (P

23

< 0.05), suggesting that non-polar hydrophobic aliphatic amino acids or polar

24

sulfur-containing amino acids were the best for the transport of tetrapeptides.

25

Pentapeptides with an N-terminal or C-terminal Tyr also showed high permeability

26

levels with Papp values about 10×10-6 cm/s. The amino acids Glu, Asn, Thr at the

27

N-terminus or Lys, Asp, Arg at the C-terminus were also beneficial for the transport of

28

tetra- and penta-peptides with Papp values ranging from 1×10-6 cm/s to 10×10-6 cm/s.

29

In addition, peptides with amino acids replaced at the N-terminus generally showed

30

higher permeability than those with amino acids replaced at the C-terminus (P < 0.05),

31

suggesting that N-terminal amino acids were more important for the transport of

32

oligopeptides across Caco-2 cell monolayer.

33

KEYWORDS: oligopeptide, amino acid, transport permeability, Caco-2 cell

34

monolayer, brush border membrane peptidase

2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 32

Page 3 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

35

INTRODUCTION

36

Bioactive peptides derived from enzymatic hydrolysis of food proteins have

37

generated much attention for their potential human health-promoting functions and

38

limited adverse effects. In the last few decades, a large number of bioactive peptides

39

have been identified from food proteins, including animal and plant proteins, as well

40

as marine proteins. These bioactive peptides have been shown to have different

41

biological activities such as antihypertensive, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory,

42

immunomodulatory, anticancer, antimicrobial, and calcium-binding activities.1

43

However, it has been found that the in vitro bioactivities of peptides do not always

44

correlate with in vivo activity.2 This is mainly because, most food-derived bioactive

45

peptides have to overcome two important physiological barriers, extensive enzymatic

46

degradation in the gastrointestinal tract, poor permeability through the intestinal

47

epithelium, and be absorbed in an intact form into the circulation to exert their

48

bioactive functions in vivo after oral administration.3 This implies the importance of

49

resistance to various peptidases, including brush border membrane peptidases, and

50

absorption through the intestine for the bioavailability of food-derived bioactive

51

peptides.

52

Neway and Smith first found that some dipeptides, such as glycyl-glycine, could be

53

absorbed through the intestine without hydrolysis.4,5 Two important H+-coupled

54

transporters for dipeptides, peptide transporter 1 (PepT1) and peptide transporter 2

55

(PepT2), were successfully cloned and identified in the 1990s, providing evidence for

56

the intact absorption of dipeptides at the molecular level.6,7 Moreover, many 3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

57

tripeptides or peptidomimetic drugs were also demonstrated to be transported by

58

PepT1 and PepT2.8 However, the exact transport pathways for oligopeptides,

59

especially peptides containing 4 to 10 amino acid residues, remain unknown.

60

Compared with di- or tri-peptides, oligopeptides are generally more easily hydrolyzed

61

by brush border membrane peptidases and have a lower permeability through the

62

intestine. It is speculated that some oligopeptides might be transported through the

63

intestinal epithelium by transcytosis and the tight junction-mediated paracellular

64

pathway,9 although convincing empirical evidence is lacking. In addition, Ananth and

65

colleagues10,11, and Chothe and colleagues12,13 reported two novel Na+-coupled

66

oligopeptide transporters SOPT1 and SOPT2, that can transport peptides consisting of

67

five or more amino acids. These two new peptide transporters differ from PepT1 and

68

PepT2, as the transport of oligopeptides through SOPT1 and SOPT2 can be

69

stimulated or inhibited by some di- or tri-peptides. Nevertheless, the genes encoding

70

SOPT1 and SOPT2 and their protein structures have not yet been fully identified.

71

Actually, regardless of the oligopeptide transport pathway, it is important to

72

understand the relationship between transport and structural features of oligopeptides

73

or whether there are structural determinants. In our previous study, the relationship

74

between the structure of RVPSL and transport across Caco-2 cell monolayer was

75

investigated. A series of pentapeptides derived from RVPSL was obtained by amino

76

acid replacement with proline. It was found that N-terminal Pro was more beneficial

77

for the transport of pentapeptides across Caco-2 cell monolayer than Arg and Val

78

residues, while no similar results were observed at the C-terminus.14 To further verify 4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 32

Page 5 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

79

the effects of terminal amino acid residues on the transport of oligopeptides, up to 78

80

Ala-based tetra- and penta-peptides with different N-terminal or C-terminal amino

81

acids were designed and their transport across Caco-2 cell monolayer was

82

investigated in the present study. In addition, the enzymatic degradation of peptides

83

by brush border membrane peptidases of Caco-2 cells was studied.

84

MATERIALS AND METHODS

85

Chemicals. Caco-2 cell lines were purchased from American Type Culture

86

Collection. All peptides were synthesized by solid-phase procedures using

87

Fmoc-protected amino acid synthetic methods with purity over 95% by ChinaPeptide

88

Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), fetal

89

bovine serum, penicillin-streptomycin, nonessential amino acid solution, and Hanks’

90

balanced salt solution (HBSS) were purchased from Gibco BRL Life Technology

91

(Carlsbad, CA, USA). Trypsin, L-glutamine, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO),

92

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and collagen type I were all purchased from

93

Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Acetonitrile (ACN), trifluoroacetic acid (TFA),

94

and methanol were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). All other

95

reagents were analytical grade.

96

Cell culture. Caco-2 cells were grown in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine

97

serum, 1% nonessential amino acid solution, 100 units/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL

98

streptomycin, and 4 mM L-glutamine at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 90%

99

relative humidity. Stock cultures were grown in 75 cm2 tissue culture flasks and were

100

split at 80% to 90% confluency using 0.25% trypsin and 0.02% EDTA solution. The 5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

101

cells from passage numbers of 30−40 were used and seeded on collagen type I-coated

102

permeable polycarbonate inserts (12 mm diameter, 0.4 µm pore size, 1.12 cm2 grown

103

surface area; Costar, Corning, NY, USA) in 12 transwell plates at a density of 1 × 105

104

cells/insert. The culture medium (0.5 mL on the apical side (AP) and 1.5 mL on the

105

basolateral side (BL)) was replaced every 2 days for the first week and then daily until

106

the cells were used for experiments 21 days after seeding. The integrity of the cell

107

monolayer was evaluated by measuring transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER)

108

values with an EVOM epithelial volt/ohmmeter (Millicell-ERS, Millipore, Billerica,

109

MA, USA). Only Caco-2 cell monolayers with TEER values higher than 300 Ω·cm2

110

were used for transport studies.

111

Transport experiments. The transepithelial transport of peptides across Caco-2

112

cell monolayer was conducted according to the method described by Hubatsch.15 The

113

Caco-2 cell monolayers were rinsed with HBSS twice and then incubated with HBSS

114

for 30 min at 37 ℃ in 5% CO2 prior to transport experiments. The HBSS was

115

removed and replaced with 0.5 mL of 3.0 mM peptides (dissolved in HBSS, pH 7.4)

116

on the AP and 1.5 mL fresh HBSS on the BL (pH 7.4). All plates were incubated at

117

37 ℃ in 5% CO2 for 2 h. Peptide concentrations on both the AP and BL were

118

determined by RP-HPLC analysis.

119

The apparent permeability coefficient (Papp, cm/s) was calculated as follows:  =

 1 1 × × ×  

120

where dC/dt was the change of peptide concentration on the BL (mM/s); A was the

121

area of the membrane (cm2); C0 was the initial peptide concentration on the AP (mM); 6

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 32

Page 7 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

122

V was the volume of the BL (mL).

123

During the process of absorption, peptides were partly degraded by various brush

124

border membrane enzymes into smaller peptides and amino acids and this might have

125

decreased the concentrations of peptides on the AP and affected the permeability of

126

peptides. For many peptides, the more they were degraded by brush border membrane

127

enzymes, the less well absorbed they were. Thus, we introduced a new permeability

128

coefficient (Papp’) here to account for the final peptide concentrations on the AP in the

129

present study.

130

The Papp’ (cm/s) was calculated as follows:  ′ =

 1 1 × × ×  

131

where dC/dt was the change of peptide concentration on the BL (mM/s); A was the

132

area of the membrane (cm2); Ct was the peptide concentration on the AP after 2 h

133

(mM); V was the volume of the BL (mL).

134 135

Degradation of peptides by various brush border membrane enzymes (cytosolic peptidases were not included) was calculated as follows: Degradation % = 1 −

 × +  × " × 100%  ×

136

where C0 and Ct were the initial and final peptide concentrations on the AP (mM),

137

respectively, and C was the peptide concentration on the BL (mM); V0 and V were the

138

volumes of the AP and BL (mL), respectively.

139

RP-HPLC. Peptides were quantified using a Shimadzu HPLC system equipped

140

with LC solution software, an LC-20AD binary gradient pump, an SIL-20AC

141

autosampler, a CTO-20AC column oven and SPD-20AV UV detector (Shimadzu, 7

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

142

Kyoto, Japan). The analytical column was a C18 reverse-phase column (Symmetry C18

143

column, 250×4.6 mm, particle size 5 mm, Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The mobile

144

phases were 0.1% TFA in water (solvent A) and 0.1% TFA in ACN (solvent B).

145

Samples were eluted with a gradient of solvent B from 15% to 55% over 15 min and

146

held at 55% for 2 min at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The injection volume was 20 µL,

147

and the absorbance detector wavelength was set at 220 nm. Peptide concentrations

148

were calculated by a linear regression analysis of known concentrations ranging from

149

1 µM to 3000 µM of peptide standard and corresponding peak areas. The calibration

150

curves of peak area vs concentration and the coefficients were then analyzed.

151

Statistical analysis. All data were expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Differences

152

between two means were detected by unpaired Student’s t-tests. When there were

153

more than two means, the differences were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance

154

(ANOVA) followed by the least significant difference (LSD) test with the significance

155

level at P < 0.05 using SPSS 19.0 software.

156

RESULTS

157

Transport of peptides. An Ala-based tetrapeptide (Ala-Ala-Ala-Ala) and

158

pentapeptide (Ala-Ala-Ala-Ala-Ala) were firstly designed and their N-terminal or

159

C-terminal amino acid residues were then replaced with other amino acids. In total, 78

160

tetra- and penta-peptides with different N-terminal or C-terminal amino acid residues

161

were obtained and synthesized. The permeability coefficients of Papp and Papp’ of these

162

oligopeptides were determined in Caco-2 cell monolayer.

163

N-terminal amino acids had a large influence on the transport of tetrapeptides 8

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 32

Page 9 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

164

(Figure 1A and B). It was found that tetrapeptides with N-terminal amino acid

165

residues of Leu, Ile, Pro, Cys, Met or Val had the highest transport permeability with

166

Papp and Papp’ values over 20×10-6 cm/s and 30×10-6 cm/s, respectively. Tetrapeptides

167

with N-terminal Tyr, Glu, Asn, Thr, Asp, Gly or His all had relatively low

168

permeability with Papp and Papp’ values ranging from 1×10-6 cm/s to 10×10-6 cm/s,

169

respectively. Tetrapeptides with N-terminal Phe, Gln, Ser, Lys, Ala, Arg and Trp were

170

either poorly transported or not transported at all. Compared with the N-terminal

171

amino acids, tetrapeptides with altered C-terminal amino acid residues generally

172

showed lower permeability (Figure 1C and D). Only the tetrapeptide with the Val at

173

C-terminus had a Papp value greater than 10×10-6 cm/s, followed by that with Cys, Glu,

174

Lys, Asp, Thr and Arg, ranging from 1×10-6 cm/s to 10×10-6 cm/s. However, the two

175

tetrapeptides with C-terminal Val and Cys residues both exhibited Papp’ values greater

176

than 40×10-6 cm/s. The amino acids Tyr, Trp, Ala, Ile, Asn, Gln, Ser, His, and Gly at

177

the C-terminus all caused tetrapeptides to be either poorly transported or not

178

transported at all across Caco-2 cell monolayer.

179

Pentapeptides with the N-terminal amino acids Asp, Gly and Tyr had Papp values

180

greater than 10×10-6 cm/s, followed by Asn, Arg, Glu, Gln, Thr, Lys, His and Cys that

181

ranged from 1×10-6 cm/s to 10×10-6 cm/s (Figure 2A). Pentapeptides with N-terminal

182

Ser, Ala, Pro, Leu, Phe, Trp, and Val residues had poor permeability or were not

183

transported at all. However, what should be noted was that the pentapeptide with an

184

N-terminal Tyr residue had the highest Papp’ value of approximately 70×10-6 cm/s and

185

it was significantly higher than pentapeptides with N-terminal Asp, Gly and Asn 9

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

186

residues (Figure 2B). Interestingly, the pentapeptide with C-terminal Tyr also showed

187

the highest Papp value compared with other C-terminal amino acids, although the Papp

188

value was only approximately 7×10-6 cm/s. Pentapeptides with the C-terminal amino

189

acids Pro, Lys, Asp, Cys, Gln, Arg and Val had lower Papp values ranging from 1×10-6

190

cm/s to 5×10-6 cm/s. Pentapeptides with Ala, Phe, Met, Ile, Trp, Leu, Glu, and Thr at

191

the C-terminus were non-permeable or had poor transport permeability (Figure 2C).

192

Notably, pentapeptides with different C-terminal amino acids showed lower Papp’

193

values compared with N-terminal replaced pentapeptides. Only the pentapeptides with

194

C-terminal Cys and Tyr had Papp’ values greater than 10×10-6 cm/s. However, it was

195

found that the Papp’ value of the pentapeptide with C-terminal Cys was higher than

196

that with Tyr. Pentapeptides with C-terminal Asp, Lys, Pro, Val, Gln, Arg, Gly, Thr,

197

Asn and Leu also showed intermediate permeability with Papp’ values ranging from

198

1×10-6 cm/s to 10×10-6 cm/s (Figure 2D).

199

The effects of the replacement of different amino acids at the N-terminus and

200

C-terminus on the transport permeability of Ala-based tetra- and penta-peptides across

201

the Caco-2 cell monolayer were compared. As shown in Figure 3, the replacement of

202

N-terminal amino acids generally improved the transport permeability of Papp (P
10

> 20

Leu, Ile, Pro, Cys, Met and Val at N-terminus; Val and Cys at C-terminus

Category

Tetrapeptides

Pentapeptides

Lys, Ser, Gln and Phe at N-terminus; Trp and Tyr at C-terminus His and Trp at N-terminus; Pro, His, Gly, Ser and Gln at C-terminus

Ser at N-terminus; Trp, Met, Ile, Phe and Ala at C-terminus

24

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Met, Val, Trp, Phe and Ile at N-terminus; Gly, His, Asn, Ser, Thr, Glu and Leu at C-terminus Asn, Arg, Glu, Gln, Thr, Lys and Cys at N-terminus; Tyr, Pro, Lys, Asp, Cys, Gln, Arg and Val at C-terminus Tyr, Asp and Gly at N-terminus

Page 25 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Figure legends Figure 1. Effects of N-terminal (A, B) and C-terminal (C, D) amino acid residues on the permeability coefficients Papp (A, C) and Papp’ (B, D) for tetrapeptides across Caco-2 cell monolayer. All values are means ± SD (n = 3). Figure 2. Effects of N-terminal (A, B) and C-terminal (C, D) amino acid residues on the permeability coefficients Papp (A, C) and Papp’ (B, D) for pentapeptides across Caco-2 cell monolayer. All values are means ± SD (n = 3). Figure 3. Effects of different amino acids at the N-terminus and C-terminus on the transport permeability of Papp (A) and Papp’ (B) for Ala-based tetra- and penta-peptides across Caco-2 cell monolayer. All values are means ± SD (n = 3). Figure 4. Correlation between the transport permeability of Papp and Papp’ of a number of Ala-based tetra- and penta-peptides with different N-terminal or C-terminal amino acids across Caco-2 cell monolayer. The solid line represents the fitted equation for all plots: y=2.5460x+0.6116; R2=0.8420, n=78; The dotted line represents the fitted equation that did not include the plots of AAAC, AAAV and YAAAA: y=2.3538x-0.0817; R2=0.8626, n=75. Figure 5. Effects of N-terminal amino acid residues on the degradation of tetrapeptides (A) and pentapeptides (B) by brush border membrane enzymes of Caco-2 cells. All values are means ± SD (n = 3). Figure 6. Effects of C-terminal amino acid residues on the degradation of tetrapeptides (A) and pentapeptides (B) by brush border membrane enzymes of Caco-2 cells. All values are means ± SD (n = 3). 25

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

-6

Papp (1×10 , cm/s) 8 -6

15

10

Papp' (1×10 , cm/s)

-6

-6

Papp (1×10 , cm/s) 20

10

6

4

FA A Q A AA SA A A KA A A RA A A AA A W AA AA HA A A DA A A G A AA NA A A EA A A TA A A YA A A VA A A PA A A M A AA A IA A CA A A LA A AA

16

Papp' (1×10 , cm/s)

FA A Q A AA SA A A KA A A AA A A RA A W AA AA HA A A G A AA DA A A TA A A NA A A EA A A YA A A VA A A M A AA CA A A IA A A PA A A LA A AA

35

AA AA AY A AA W A AA N A AA A A AA Q A AA S AH AA AA AI A AA G A AA P A AA M A AA F A AA L A AA D A AA T A AA R A AA E A AA K A AA C AV

AA AA AY A AA W A AA A AA AI A AA N A AA Q A AA S A AA F A AA G A AA M A AA H A AA L A AA P A AA R A AA T AD AA A AA K A AA E A AA C AV

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

(A)

Papp 90

30

5

0

(C) 80

2 10

0 0

(B)

Papp'

80

25 70

60

50

40

30

20

10 0

14

(D)

12 70

60

50

40

30

20

Figure 1

26

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 26 of 32

-6

Papp (1×10 , cm/s) 4 -6

5

3

2

Papp' (1×10 , cm/s)

-6

12 60

10 50

6

4

Papp' (1×10 , cm/s)

-6

Papp (1×10 , cm/s) 8

8 20

SA A AA AA A LA AA A IA AA W AAA AA FA AA A VA AA A M AA AA HA AA A PA AA A KA AA A CA AA A TA AA A Q AA AA EA AA A RA AA A NA AA A G AA AA DA AA A YA AA AA A

SA A AA AA A PA AA A LA AA AA IA A A FA AA W AAA AA VA AA A M AA AA CA AA A HA AA A KA AA A TA AA A Q AA AA EA AA A RA AA A NA AA A YA AA A G AA AA DA AA AA A

14

AA A AA AA A AA AF AA AA M AA AA A I AA AW A AA AE A AA AH A AA AS A AA AL A AA AN A AA AT A AA AG A AA AR A AA AQ A AA AV A AA AP A AA AK A AA AD A AA AY AA C

AA A AA AA A AA AF AA AA M AA AA AA I AA W A AA AL A AA AE A AA AT A AA AS A AA AN A AA AH A AA AG A AA AV A AA AR A AA AQ A AA AC A AA AD A AA AK A AA AP AA Y

Page 27 of 32 Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

(A)

Papp 70

2 10

0 0

(C)

7 18

1

0

(B)

Papp'

40

30

20

(D)

6 16

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

Figure 2

27

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

(A)

35

N-terminus C-terminus

30

-6

Papp (1×10 cm/s)

Page 28 of 32

25 20 15 10 5 0 0 90

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

35

40

number of peptides

(B)

N-terminus C-terminus

80

60 50

-6

Papp' (1×10 cm/s)

70

40 30 20 10 0

0

5

10

15

20

25

number of peptides

30

Figure 3

28

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 29 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

y=2.5460x+0.6116, 2 R =0.8420, n=78

80

YAAAA 70

AAAV

-6

Papp' (1×10 cm/s)

60 50

AAAC

y=2.3538x-0.0817, 2 R =0.9626, n=75

40 30 20 10 0 0

5

10

15

20

25

30

-6

Papp (1×10 cm/s) Figure 4

29

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

35

H A R AA A A G AA A A D AA AA A TA AA EAAA A KAAA A A IA A A Q AA A A W AA A A C AA AA A N A A A VAAA A FAAA A M AA AA A LA A A YAAA A AAAA A PAAA A SAAA AAA A

Degradation (%) PA LAAA VAAA H AA AA IA A C AA A YAAA M AA A D AA A EAAA N AA A SAAA TAAA G AA A W AA AA R A A KAAA Q AA A FAAA AAAA AA

Degradation (%)

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

90

80

100

90

(A)

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

(B)

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Figure 5

30

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 30 of 32

AA AAAAH AAAA Y AAAA P AAAA S AAAA K AA AA E AAAA G AAAA D AA AA R AAAA Q AAAA N AA AA V AAAAC AAAAT AA AA A L AA AM A A AF AA AA A AI AA AW AA A

Degradation (%) AA AA AE AAAD AAAH AA AT AA AS AAAN AA AP AAAQ AA AK AAAG AA AV AAAC AAAR AAAA AAAY A AA L AA AI AA AM A AA W AF

Degradation (%)

Page 31 of 32 Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

100 90

100

90

(A)

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

(B)

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Figure 6

31

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

XAAA/XAAAA AAAX/AAAAX Caco-2 cell monolayers

Good permeability 35 30

-6

Papp (1×10 , cm/s)

25

Intermediate permeability

20

Non/Poor permeability 15 10

Low permeability

5

AA AA S W SAAA A A AA AA W AW A AAAA AA AS W A AA G AA AA AA A H AA AA S A AA A AA H A G AAAA R TAAA AAR A A AAAA A D AAAD TAAK N AA AAAA A A EAAK EA A A N AA AA A YA A A G AA AA A D A AA A AAAA VAAV M AA A C AA AA IA A PAAA LAAA AA

0

Table of content graphic

32

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 32 of 32