Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV
Article
In vitro bioavailability, cellular antioxidant activity, and cytotoxicity of #-carotene-loaded emulsions stabilized by catechin-egg white protein conjugates Luping Gu, Che Pan, Yujie Su, Ruojie Zhang, Hang Xiao, David Julian McClements, and Yan-Jun Yang J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05909 • Publication Date (Web): 31 Jan 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on February 1, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
In vitro bioavailability, cellular antioxidant activity, and cytotoxicity of β-carotene-loaded emulsions stabilized by catechin-egg white protein conjugates Luping Gu†,‡, Che Pan‡, Yujie Su†, Ruojie Zhang‡, Hang Xiao‡, David Julian McClements*,‡, Yanjun Yang*,†
†
Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, School of Food Science and Technology,
Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, People’s Republic of China ‡
Department of Food Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, United States
*Corresponding author: Email address:
[email protected];
[email protected] 1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Page 2 of 40
Abstract
2
Previously, it was shown that catechin-egg white protein (CT-EWP) conjugates were
3
effective antioxidant emulsifiers that could form and stabilize emulsions, and also inhibit the
4
degradation of encapsulated carotenoids. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the
5
impact of conjugation on the in vitro bioavailability, cellular antioxidant activity, and cytotoxicity
6
of β-carotene-loaded emulsions. Lipid droplets coated with EWP or with CT-EWP conjugates
7
exhibited quite similar behavior when they were passed through a simulated gastrointestinal
8
tract. The β-carotene encapsulated in emulsions stabilized by CT-EWP conjugates exhibited a
9
higher overall in vitro bioavailability, which was attributed to a greater stability of the
10
carotenoids to chemical transformation. The emulsions stabilized by CT-EWP conjugates also
11
exhibited greater ability in inhibiting oxidation in a cell-based assay (dichlorofluorescin
12
diacetate). Cytotoxicity analysis suggested that β-carotene emulsions stabilized by CT-EWP
13
conjugates only exhibited a slight cytotoxicity when used at high concentrations. These results
14
suggest that CT-EWP conjugates can be used to formulate emulsion-based delivery systems for
15
chemically labile hydrophobic bioactives with enhanced antioxidant activity and bioavailability.
16 17
Keywords: β-carotene; conjugates; bioavailability; antioxidant activity; cytotoxicity
2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 3 of 40
18 19
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Introduction Some carotenoids, such as β-carotene, have been shown to be bioactive components that 1, 2
20
have potential health benefits
21
vitamin A activity and acts as an effective antioxidant
22
highly hydrophobic and chemically labile molecule in functional foods is currently restricted due
23
to its poor water-solubility, chemical instability, and low oral bioavailability 5. These limitations
24
can be overcome by encapsulating β-carotene within well-designed emulsion-based delivery
25
systems, such as emulsions or nanoemulsions 6, 7. In O/W emulsions, β-carotene is present inside
26
small oil droplets that are dispersed in a water phase. The oil droplets are coated by a layer of
27
emulsifier molecules, which are usually selected to ensure good physical stability of the
28
emulsions by inhibiting flocculation or coalescence, but which may also be selected to provide
29
protection against chemical instability (such as oxidation). After ingestion, it is important that the
30
encapsulated carotenoids have a high oral bioavailability, which depends on their
31
bioaccessibility, transformation, and absorption characteristics 7. First, the lipid droplets should
32
be fully digested and release the encapsulated carotenoids into the surrounding intestinal fluids in
33
an absorbable form (bioaccessibility). In the stomach and small intestine, the triacylglycerol
34
molecules at the surfaces of the oil droplets are hydrolyzed by lipase into free fatty acids and
35
monoacylglycerols, which then mix with bile salts and phospholipids to form mixed micelles
36
capable of solubilizing and transporting the β-carotene molecules released from the lipid
37
droplets. In addition, the efficacy of the ingested carotenoids depends on the fraction that
38
remains in a biologically active form (transformation) and the fraction that is transported across
39
the epithelium cells (absorption). Consequently, it is important to determine the impact of any
40
new emulsifier used to fabricate an emulsion-based delivery system on the oral bioavailability of
. Numerous studies have reported that β-carotene has high pro3, 4
. Nevertheless, the utilization of this
3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
41 42
Page 4 of 40
encapsulated nutraceuticals. Recently, it has been shown that antioxidant emulsifiers can be fabricated by covalently
43
attaching polyphenols to proteins 8. The proteins provide good emulsifying properties
44
whereas the polyphenols provide strong interfacial antioxidant activity
45
have shown the protein-polyphenol conjugates synthesized using a free radical grafting method
46
improved the physical and chemical stability of β-carotene-enriched emulsions, when compared
47
with native proteins or conjugates prepared using other approaches
48
catechin-egg white proteins (CT-EWP) conjugates were fabricated using free radical grafting and
49
then the conjugates were utilized as a novel antioxidant emulsifier to prepare β-carotene-enriched
50
emulsions. Compared to native proteins, CT-EWP conjugates formed emulsions with improved
51
stability to environmental stresses (such as pH, salt, and heating), and that were better at
52
inhibiting the degradation of encapsulated β-carotene during storage. However, to the best our
53
knowledge, no information is currently available about the impact of these conjugates on the
54
bioavailability of the encapsulated bioactive agents.
14, 15
11-13
9, 10
,
. Previous studies
. In our previous study,
55
Consequently, a major objective of the current study was to determine the impact of
56
stabilizing emulsions with CT-EWP conjugates on the potential oral bioavailability of
57
encapsulated β-carotene. As mentioned earlier, the overall bioavailability depends on the
58
bioaccessibility, transformation, and absorption of the bioactive within the gastrointestinal tract
59
(GIT). The bioaccessibility and transformation of the carotenoids was determined using a three-
60
stage simulated gastrointestinal fate (GIT) model consisting of mouth, stomach, and small
61
intestine phases 16. The absorption of the carotenoids was determined using a cell culture model
62
(Caco-2 cells) that mimics the human intestinal layer
63
EWP conjugates had strong antioxidant activity, but the in vitro chemical assays used in that
17, 18
. Our previous work found that CT-
4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
64
study have low relevance for predicting the potential antioxidant effects of nutraceuticals within
65
the human body. For this reason, the cellular antioxidant activity of the conjugates and β-
66
carotene emulsions was also analyzed in the current study. Moreover, the potential toxicity of the
67
CT-EWP conjugate-stabilized emulsions was tested to evaluate their potential for applications in
68
the food industry.
69
The objective of this study was to evaluate the bioavailability, cellular antioxidant activity,
70
and cytotoxicity of β-carotene emulsions stabilized by CT-EWP conjugates so as to establish the
71
potential of this new antioxidant emulsifier for application in functional foods and beverages.
72
Materials and Methods
73
Materials
74
Fresh eggs and sunflower oil were purchased from a local supermarket. β-carotene, 2’,7’-
75
dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFH-DA), tert-Butyl hydroperoxide (t-BHP, 70%), 3-(4,5-
76
dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium
77
isothiocyanate (FITC), mucin from porcine stomach, pepsin from porcine gastric mucosa, lipase
78
from porcine pancreas, and porcine bile extract were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis,
79
MO, USA). Human colon carcinoma cell lines (Caco-2 cells, ATCC, Manassas, VA) were used
80
for cellular cytotoxicity, antioxidant activity and uptake assays after 30~45 passages. Dulbecco’s
81
modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (with 4.5g/L Glucose, L-Glutamine, and Sodium Pyruvate),
82
fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin-streptomycin (10,000 U/mL), Non-Essential Amino Acids
83
Solution (NAA, 100 X), HEPES (1 M), Trypsin-EDTA (0.25%), Phosphate Buffered Saline (10
84
X), Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), n-hexane, chloroform, Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were
85
obtained from Fisher Scientific (Agawam, MA, USA). All other chemicals and reagents used
86
were analytical grade. Double distilled water was used to prepare all aqueous solutions.
bromide
(MTT),
Nile
red,
fluorescein
5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
87
Page 6 of 40
Preparation of β-carotene Emulsions
88
Catechin-egg white protein (CT-EWP) conjugates were synthesized using a free radical
89
grafting method, and the amount of catechin bound to the egg white protein was found to be 5.71
90
mg/g conjugates. Their successful fabrication was confirmed using electrophoresis and liquid
91
chromatography-mass spectrometry, as described in our previous study
92
conjugates were used as an antioxidant emulsifier to encapsulate β-carotene within oil-in-water
93
emulsions. In brief, an aqueous phase was prepared by dissolving CT-EWP conjugates (2%,
94
w/w) in phosphate buffer solution (5 mM, pH 3.0) and then stirring overnight at 25 °C to ensure
95
dissolution. An oil phase was prepared by dispersing β-carotene (0.1%) in sunflower oil and then
96
sonicating for 20 min at 50 °C in the absence of light to ensure complete dispersion and
97
dissolution of the carotenoid crystals. Coarse emulsions were then fabricated by mixing the
98
aqueous phase (90% w/w) and oil phase (10% w/w), using a high-shear mixer for 2 min
99
(M133/1281-0, Biospec Products, Inc., ESGC, Switzerland). After that, the coarse emulsions
100
were passed through a high-pressure homogenizer (M110P, Microfluidics, Newton, MA) at
101
12000 psi for three cycles to form β-carotene-loaded oil-in-water emulsions. After preparation,
102
the emulsions were immediately placed in a refrigerator before further use. Emulsions prepared
103
using egg white protein (EWP) (rather than CT-EWP conjugates) as an emulsifier were used as
104
controls.
105
Cellular Antioxidant Activity of β-carotene Emulsions
106
15
. The CT-EWP
The cellular antioxidant of the samples was evaluated in Caco-2 cells using the DCFH-DA 19
107
assay described previously
108
NAA, and 1% penicillin and streptomycin at 37 °C in an incubator with 5% CO2 and 95%
109
humidified air. When the cells reached 80% confluence, they were seeded and grown in 96-well
. Caco-2 cells were cultured in DMEM containing 10% FBS, 1%
6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
110
plates (1×105 cells/mL). After 24 hours, the cells were treated with different concentrations of β-
111
carotene emulsions stabilized by either CT-EWP conjugates or EWP, or they were treated with
112
aqueous solutions containing either CT-EWP conjugates or EWP. The samples were obtained by
113
diluting initial emulsions and solutions 20, 40, 60, 80, or 100 times with DMEM and then
114
treating the cells for 24 hours. After that, the plates were treated with 100 µL of DCFH-DA (10
115
µM) per well and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. The plates were then washed with PBS (1 X)
116
twice before adding 100 µL of t-BHP (500 µM) to each well (except the negative control) and
117
then incubating for 30 min at room temperature. Finally, the fluorescence intensity of the
118
samples was recorded using a Microplate Reader (Synergy 2 Multi-Mode, BioTek Instruments,
119
Inc., Winooski, VT) at an emission wavelength of 528 nm and an excitation wavelength of 485
120
nm.
121 122
The cellular antioxidant activity of the samples was then calculated using the following equation: Cellular Antioxdant Activity% =
− !"#$" −
123
Here, Asample is the fluorescence intensity of the cells treated with different samples, Ablank is
124
the fluorescence intensity of the blank wells, and Acontrol is the fluorescence intensity of the cells
125
treated with DMEM only.
126
In vitro Cytotoxicity of β-carotene Emulsions
127
The MTT assay was utilized to determine the impact of the samples on cell viability and
128
therefore evaluate their potential cytotoxicity 20. In brief, Caco-2 cells were incubated in 96-well
129
plates at a density of 1×105 cells/mL at 37 °C in 5% CO2 incubator. After incubation for 24
130
hours, the cells were treated with β-carotene emulsions stabilized by either CT-EWP conjugates
131
and EWP, or with aqueous solutions containing either CT-EWP conjugates or EWP. A range of 7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 8 of 40
132
concentrations was utilized for each sample tested by diluting with DMED (20, 40, 60, 80, and
133
100 times) prior to analysis so as to ascertain the influence of emulsifier concentration on
134
cytotoxicity. After a further 24 hours, the cells were treated with 100 µL MTT solution (0.5
135
mg/mL) and incubated for 1 hour at 37 °C. Then, 100 µL of DMSO was used to dissolve the
136
products and the absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 570 nm using a Microplate Reader
137
(Synergy 2 Multi-Mode, BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT).
138
The cell viability was then calculated using the following equation: Cell Viability% =
139
− !"#$" −
Here, Asample is the absorbance of the cells treated with samples, Ablank is the absorbance of
140
blank wells, and Acontrol is the absorbance of cells treated with DMEM only.
141
In Vitro Digestion of β-carotene Emulsions
142
A three-step simulated gastrointestinal tract (GIT) model that consisted of mouth, stomach
143
and small intestine phases was utilized to evaluate the potential gastrointestinal fate of the
144
different samples and controls. The simulated saliva fluid (SSF) (sodium chloride 1.594 g/L,
145
ammonium nitrate 0.328 g/L, potassium phosphate 0.636 g/L, potassium chloride 0.202 g/L,
146
potassium citrate 0.308 g/L, uric acid sodium salt 0.021 g/L, urea 0.198 g/L, lactic acid sodium
147
salt 0.146 g/L), simulated gastric fluid (SGF) (sodium chloride 2 g/L, hydrochloric acid 83.3
148
mM), and simulated intestine fluid (SIF) (calcium chloride dihydrate 36.67 g/L, sodium chloride
149
219.13 g/L) were prepared as described as our previous study 21.
150
Mouth phase: Initially, 4 g of β-carotene emulsion was mixed with 16 g of phosphate buffer
151
(5 mM, pH 3.0) to reach the desired oil concentration (2%, w/w). Then, 20 g of the diluted
152
emulsions and 20 g of SSF containing mucin (30 mg/mL) were preheated to 37 °C and then
153
mixed together. The mixture was adjusted to pH 6.8 and then swirled for 2 min at a speed of 100 8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
154
rpm in an incubator shaker set at 37 °C (Innova Incubator Shaker, Model 4080, New Brunswick
155
Scientific, Edison, NJ).
156
Stomach phase: 20 g of the sample resulting from the mouth phase was mixed with 20 g of
157
SGF (37 °C) containing pepsin (3.2 mg/mL) and then adjusted to pH 2.5. After that, the mixture
158
was placed in the incubator shaker and swirled for 2 h at 100 rpm and 37 °C.
159
Small intestine phase: 30 g of the sample resulting from the stomach phase was placed in a
160
water bath (37 °C) and adjusted to pH 7.0. Subsequently, 1.5 mL of SIF and 3.5 mL of bile
161
extract (53.57 mg/mL) were added, and the mixture was then adjusted back to pH 7.0. Then, 2.5
162
mL of lipase suspension (24 mg/mL) was added and the mixture was maintained at pH 7.0 for 2
163
h by adding NaOH solution (0.25 M) using a pH-stat automatic titration device (Metrohm USA
164
Inc., Riverview, FL, USA). The volume of NaOH solution required to neutralize the FFA was
165
recorded during the incubation. The amount of free fatty acids released was then estimated using
166
the following equation: FFA% =
()*+ × -)*+ × ./001 × 100 2/001 × 2
167
Here, VNaOH is the volume of NaOH solution required to neutralize the FFA, mNaOH is the
168
molarity of the NaOH solution (0.25 M), MLipid is the average molecular weight of the sunflower
169
oil (876 g/mol), and WLipid is the weight of the sunflower oil in the digestion system (0.15 g).
170
Determination of Particle Characterization
171
The particle size distribution and mean particle diameter of the samples exposed to different
172
regions of the simulated GIT were determined using a laser light scattering instrument
173
(Mastersizer 2000, Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, Worcestershire, UK). Prior to particle
174
size measurements, the initial emulsions were diluted with phosphate buffer (5 mM, pH 3) to
175
minimize multiple scattering effects. The mouth and small intestine samples were diluted with 9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 10 of 40
176
neutral phosphate buffer (5 mM, pH 7), while the stomach samples were diluted with acidic
177
phosphate buffer (5 mM, pH 2.5). The ζ-potential values of the particles in the samples were
178
determined using a particle electrophoresis device (Zetasizer Nano, Malvern Instruments,
179
Worcestershire, UK). In this case, the initial emulsions were diluted with acidic phosphate buffer
180
(5 mM, pH 3), the mouth samples were diluted with SSF (pH 6.8), the stomach samples were
181
diluted with SGF (pH 2.5), and the small intestine samples were diluted with neutral phosphate
182
buffer (5 mM, pH 7). The refractive index of the aqueous phase and oil phase used in the
183
calculations were 1.33 and 1.45, respectively.
184
For microstructure analysis, the samples exposed to different regions of the GIT were
185
collected and then diluted with phosphate buffer as described for the particle size measurements.
186
Then, 1 mL of diluted samples was transferred to a glass test tube, and then, 20 µL of Nile red (1
187
mg/mL) and 20 µL of FITC (1 mg/mL) were added to stain the lipids and proteins, respectively.
188
After that, a drop of sample was placed on a microscope slide and covered with a thin glass
189
cover slip. The microstructural images were captured using a Nikon confocal microscope (Nikon
190
D-Eclipse C1 80i, Nikon, Melville, NY, USA) at a magnification of ×600 (×60 objective lens and
191
×10 eyepiece lens) and then analyzed using image analysis software (NIS-Elements, Nikon,
192
Melville, NY).
193
Determination of β-carotene Oral Bioavailability
194
The overall oral bioavailability (BA) of bioactives is determined by three main factors:
195
bioaccessibility (B*); absorption (A*); and stability to transformation (T*), as described
196
previously by our research group 7, 22: BA% = 7 ∗ × ∗ × 9 ∗
197
For this reason, we carried out experiments to determine the relative contribution of these
10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11 of 40
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
198
three factors to the overall bioavailability of β-carotene in the emulsion-based delivery systems
199
prepared in this study.
200
Bioaccessibility (B*): After emulsions had passed through the three-step simulated GIT
201
model, 20 g of small intestine sample was centrifuged (18,000 rpm, Thermo Scientific, Waltham,
202
MA) at 4 °C for 30 min. The yellow supernatant that appeared after centrifugation of the samples
203
was assumed to be the “micelle” fraction in which the β-carotene was solubilized, and the
204
carotenoid concentration in this fraction was determined according to a method described
205
previously 23. In brief, 2 mL of micelle phase was mixed with 2 mL of chloroform and 2 mL of
206
ethanol, and then the mixture was shaken vigorously for 20 s and centrifuged for 5 min at 3500
207
rpm. The supernatant layer was then transferred to a glass test tube and diluted with chloroform
208
to an appropriate concentration. Then, the absorbance of the diluted supernatant was recorded at
209
450 nm using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Cary 100 UV-Vis, Agilent Technologies, Santa
210
Clara, CA, USA), with chloroform as a control. The β-carotene concentration in the total small
211
intestine sample (without centrifugation) was also measured using the same approach. The
212
carotenoid concentrations were determined from the absorbance measurements using a standard
213
curve prepared using samples of known β-carotene level. The bioaccessibility of β-carotene was
214
calculated using the following equation: Bioaccessibility% =
-;0! × 100 -