In Vitro Digestion and Fermentation of Three Polysaccharide Fractions

May 24, 2019 - The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b00970. ... Download...
3 downloads 0 Views 894KB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIV AUTONOMA DE COAHUILA UADEC

Functional Structure/Activity Relationships

In vitro digestion and fermentation of three polysaccharide fractions from Laminaria japonica and their impact on lipid metabolism-associated human gut microbiota Jie Gao, Lianzhu Lin, Zijie Chen, Yongjian Cai, Chuqiao Xiao, Feibai Zhou, Baoguo Sun, and Mouming Zhao J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b00970 • Publication Date (Web): 24 May 2019 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 29, 2019

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Title and authorship In vitro digestion and fermentation of three polysaccharide fractions from Laminaria japonica and their impact on lipid metabolism-associated human gut microbiota Jie Gao a, c, Lianzhu Lin a, c, Zijie Chen a, c, Yongjian Cai a, c, Chuqiao Xiao a, c, Feibai Zhou a, c, Baoguo Sun b, d, Mouming Zhao a, b, c, d, * a

School of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology Guangzhou 510640, China b Beijing

Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health,

Beijing Technology & Business University, Beijing 100048, China c Guangdong

Food Green Processing and Nutrition Regulation Technologies Research Center, Guangzhou 510640, China d

Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, Beijing Technology & Business University, Beijing 100048 *Corresponding author Mouming Zhao (Tel./Fax: +86 20 87113914; E-mail: [email protected]). No.381, Wushan Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

Abstract

2

Our previous study has proved that the three polysaccharide fractions from L.

3

japonica (LP-A4, LP-A6, and LP-A8) had significantly different structure

4

characterization. Herein, we conducted in vitro simulated digestion and fermentation to

5

study the digestive mechanism of LP-As. The results of gastrointestinal digestion

6

indicated that LP-A6 and LP-A8 would be easier to trap the enzyme molecules for their

7

denser interconnected macromolecule network compared with LP-A4. Fermentation of

8

LP-As by human gut microbiota, especially for LP-A8, generated a large amount of

9

short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), which could upregulate the abundance of Firmicutes

10

(Lachnoclostridium and Eubacterium). The high content of sulfate and highly branched

11

sugar residue of LP-A8 might help it be easily used by Firmicutes in gut microbiota of

12

hyperlipidemic patients. Functional analysis revealed that the increased metabolic

13

activities of glycerophospholipid metabolism, ether lipid metabolism and fatty acid

14

metabolism induced by LP-A8 treatment were closely associated with metabolic

15

syndromes and hyperlipidemia.

16

Keywords: Laminaria japonica polysaccharide fractions; Gastrointestinal digestion;

17

Gut microbiota; Fermentation; Lipid metabolism

2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 32

Page 3 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

18

INTRODUCTION

19

There is a growing interest in understanding how soluble dietary fiber

20

(polysaccharide) could be digested in the human gastrointestinal tract and affect the

21

intestinal microbiota.1-4 Simulated gastrointestinal digestion is usually used to study the

22

digestive mechanism of functional food, because human experiments are expensive,

23

resource intensive and ethically disputable.5 Reproducibility, controlled conditions, less

24

sample consumption and easy sampling at the site of interest make in vitro models very

25

suitable for digestive and metabolic mechanism studies of purified polysaccharide

26

fractions. Simulated digestion methods typically include the oral, gastric and small

27

intestinal phases, and occasionally colon fermentation, taking into account the

28

concentrations of digestive enzymes, pH, digestion time and salt concentrations.6-9

29

Evidence is now accumulating to demonstrate that the gut microbiota plays a

30

critical role in the development of diseases associated with lipid metabolism.10-17

31

Animal models are commonly used to investigate the possible correlation between gut

32

microbiota and lipid metabolism, which are much more convenient and affordable than

33

conducting human trials.9-12 However, human gut microbiota may differ markedly from

34

the animal models and it is not feasible to perform in vivo studies for the purified

35

polysaccharide fractions. Recently, short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), produced by

36

particular gut microbiota in colon, are being investigated in different ways to explain

37

the association between gut microbiota and human body. These fatty acids not only

38

serve as energy sources for the gut microbiota but also have impact on lipid and glucose

39

metabolism.18-20

3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 4 of 32

40

L. japonica is the most widely cultivated and consumed commercial edible brown

41

seaweed around the world. Numerous published papers have demonstrated that

42

polysaccharides from L. japonica have beneficial bioactivities for human health, such

43

as

44

immunoregulation and hypolipidemic activities, which are particularly associated with

45

their structural characteristics.21-27 Our previous study suggested that the three

46

polysaccharide

47

fucomannoglucan and fucogalactan, had notably distinct structure feature and bile acid-

48

binding capacity.28 Compared with other two fractions, LP-A8 exhibited the highest

49

bile acid-binding capacity, which might have correlation with their abundant sulfate,

50

very tiny amounts of uronic acid and highly branched sugar residue such as (1→2, 3,

51

4) linked β-D-ManpA. 28 However, limited information is focused on the connection

52

between digestive mechanism and structural characteristics of purified polysaccharide

53

fractions from L. japonica.

antioxidant,

antiallergic,

fractions

of

anticancer,

L.

japonica,

anti-thrombotic,

characterized

as

anticoagulant,

mannoglucan,

54

Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate how the LP-As digest in the

55

gastrointestinal tract and alter the gut microbiota with SCFA production. Herein, we

56

conducted in vitro simulated digestion and fermentation to study the digestive

57

mechanism of three purified polysaccharide fractions (LP-A4, LP-A6 and LP-A8) from

58

L. japonica. Fermentation of LP-A4, LP-A6 and LP-A8 by human gut microbiota

59

generates large amount of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and leads to the change of

60

gut microbiota community composition, which could change the microbiota

61

composition, uphold health and be a valuable food supplement.

4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

62

MATERIALS AND METHODS

63

Materials

64

L. japonica, harvested in July 2018 from Weihai (Shandong, China), was washed

65

with tap water and distilled water, then dried at 60 °C in an oven. The dried samples

66

were pulverized to get the powdered material using a 50-mesh screen. Pepsin from

67

porcine gastric mucosa, α-amylase from human saliva, pancreatin, SCFAs standards

68

including acetic, propionic, butyric, valeric, isobutyric and isovaleric acids were

69

purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corp. (St. Louis, USA). All the other reagents used in

70

the present study were of analytical grade.

71

Extraction and Purification of L. Japonica Polysaccharide

72

The extraction and purification methods used in this study were as described in

73

our previously published paper.24 Briefly, the dried L. japonica powder was extracted

74

with 0.1 mol/L HCl solution. The L. japonica polysaccharide (LP-A) was got by freeze-

75

drying of the final polysaccharide solution after precipitation and dialysis. The

76

purification of LP-A was conducted with ion-exchange chromatography which was

77

monitored with phenol-sulfuric acid reaction.2 The three purified LP-A fractions, LP-

78

A4, LP-A6 and LP-A8, were obtained after dialysis, concentrating and lyophilization,

79

which would be used in the subsequent digeston and fermentation.

80

Simulated gastrointestinal digestion

81 82 83

The simulated salivary, gastric and intestinal fluids were made according to the previously published procedures with some modifications. 1 The simulated salivary fluid (SSF) consisted of 15.1 mmol/L KCl, 13.6 mmol/L

5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

84

NaHCO3, 3.7 mmol/L KH2PO4, 0.15 mmol/L MgCl2(H2O)6 and 0.06 mmol/L

85

(NH4)2CO3 and 1.1 mmol/L HCl 10 mg of LP-As were dissolved in 1 mL distilled water

86

to make a solution for the simulated salivary digestion. The simulated salivary digestion

87

(SSD) tube was the mixture of 5 mL of LP-As solution (10mg/mL), 3.5mL SSF, 0.5

88

mL 1500 U/mL salivary alpha-amylase solution (alpha-amylase, 1000-3000 U/mg

89

protein, human saliva Type IX-A, Sigma), 25 μL CaCl2(H2O)2 (0.3 mol/L) and 0.975

90

mL distilled water. The simulated salivary digestion test was conducted at 37 °C for 5

91

min and then heated in a boiling bath for 5 min.

92

The simulated gastric fluid (SGF) consisted of 47.2 mmol/L NaCl, 25 mmol/L

93

NaHCO3, 8.5 mmol/L HCl, 6.9 mmol/L KCl, 0.9 mmol/L KH2PO4, 0.5 mmol/L

94

(NH4)2CO3 and 0.1 mmol/L MgCl2(H2O)6. The simulated gastric digestion (SGD) tube

95

was the mixture of 5 mL of salivary chyme from the simulated salivary digestion, 3.75

96

mL SGF, 0.8 mL 25000 U/mL porcine pepsin solution (pepsin, 3200-4500 U/mg

97

protein, porcine gastric mucosa, Sigma), 2.5 μL CaCl2(H2O)2 (0.3 mol/L), 0.1mL HCl

98

(1.0 mol/L) and 0.348 mL distilled water. The simulated salivary digestion test was

99

conducted at 37 °C for 2h and then heated in a boiling bath for 5 min.

100

The simulated intestinal fluid (SIF) consisted of 85 mmol/L NaHCO3, 38.4

101

mmol/L NaCl, 8.4 mmol/L HCl, 6.8 mmol/L KCl, 0.8 mmol/L KH2PO4 and 0.33

102

mmol/L MgCl2(H2O)6. The simulated gastric digestion (SGD) tube was the mixture of

103

5 mL of gastric chyme from the simulated gastric digestion, 2.75 mL SIF, 1.25 mL

104

pancreatin solution (800 U/mL trypsin, porcine pancreas, Sigma), 0.625mL fresh bile

105

(160 mM), 10 μL CaCl2(H2O)2 (0.3 mol/L), 38 μL NaOH (1.0 mol/L) and 0.328 mL

6

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 32

Page 7 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

106

distilled water. The simulated salivary digestion test was conducted at 37 °C for 2h and

107

then heated in a boiling bath for 5 min.

108

After simulated digestion, the molecular weight distribution of LP-As was

109

determined by high performance size exclusion chromatography equipped with multi-

110

angle laser light scattering and refractive index detector (HPSEC-MALLS-RID). Each

111

sample was replicated three times.

112

Microscopic observation and molecular weight distribution

113

The simulated salivary, gastric and intestinal digestion solutions were put on slide

114

glass substrates at room temperature and observed at 400× magnification by optical

115

microscope. The molecular weight distribution of the LP-As after simulated salivary,

116

gastric and intestinal digestion were measured and compared by using HPSEC-

117

MALLS-RID according to the previous published method.29

118

HPSEC-MALLS-RID measurements were conducted on a multiangle laser light

119

scattering detector (MALLS, DAWN HELEOS-Ⅱ, Wyatt Technology Co., Santa

120

Barbara, CA, USA) with a 2998 PDA detector in a Waters e2695 HPLC system coupled

121

with TSK-GEL G5000PWXL (300 mm × 7.8 mm, i.d.) and TSK-GEL G3000PWXL

122

(300 mm × 7.8 mm, i.d.) columns in series. Bovine serum albumin (BSA, 5 mg/mL)

123

was used to normalize the diodes of the MALLS detector. A dn/dc value of 0.185 mL/g

124

was determined for the BSA in our carrier liquid. NaCl aqueous solution (0.9%) was

125

used as mobile phase at the flow rate of 0.6 mL/min. The simulated digestion solution

126

was filtered by a 0.22 mm membrane and tested at an injection volume of 50 μL and a

127

concentration of 2 mg/mL. The Astra software (Version 6.0.2, Wyatt Tech. Corp. Santa

7

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

128

Barbara, CA, USA) was used for data analysis.

129

In vitro fermentation

130

In vitro fermentation of LP-As was performed in triplicate according to the

131

published methods with some modification.1-4, 30 Fecal samples were collected from

132

two healthy donors (group NL, normal-lipid control, one female and one male, 45 - 60

133

years old, TG 1.52 ± 0.1 mmol/L, TC 5.97 ± 0.49 mmol/L) and two hyperlipidemic

134

patients (group HL, hyper-lipid control, one female and one male, 45 - 60 years old,

135

TG 8.8 ± 0.28 mmol/L, TC 6.64 ± 1.40 mmol/L) who were eating their regular diets

136

without taking antibiotics for more than 3 months. Fecal samples were tightly sealed in

137

plastic tubes, kept on ice prior to rapidly being stored in -80 °C refrigerator, and used

138

within 7 days of collection. The fecal samples were homogenized with sterilized

139

phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4 (feces: PBS buffer= 1: 9 (w/v)) and then filtered and

140

pooled to make the fecal slurries under anaerobic conditions maintained by Anaero

141

Pack (Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Co., Tokyo, Japan). Then 100 μL of pooled fecal slurry

142

and 400 μL of LP-As (17.5 mg LP-As dissolved in 400 μL PBS buffer, the final

143

concentration for fermentation was 0.5%, w/v,) were inoculated into 3mL brain heart

144

infusion (BHI) and incubated in a 37 °C incubator (120 rpm) for 120 h anaerobically

145

(AnaeroPack‐Anaero; Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Co., Tokyo, Japan). The preparation

146

of pooled fecal samples for fermentation experiments does not lead to a bacterial

147

community with an aberrant profile and activity compared to that normally prepared

148

from single donors.4, 9, 30 And according to the previous published studies, every steps

149

of making fecal slurries should be kept in anaerobic conditions. At the end of the

8

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 32

Page 9 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

150

fermentation for each LP-As fraction, two aliquots were collected from each sample for

151

DNA extraction (1 mL) and SCFA analysis (1 mL).

152

SCFA analysis

153

SCFA analyses were conducted as previously described.31 1 mL of each sample

154

with 1% of formic acid were suspended and stored at -20 °C immediately after

155

collection. Once thawed, the sample suspensions were homogenized and then

156

centrifuged for 10 min at 17949 × g. One mL supernatant of each sample was extracted

157

with 1 mL of ethyl acetate for 2 min and then separated by centrifugation for 10 min at

158

17949 × g. Organic extracts were obtained and stored at -20 °C. Before analysis, 600

159

μL organic extracts was transferred into a test tube with 500 μmol/L 4-methyl valeric

160

acid as IS. The IS was employed for the correction of injection variability between

161

samples and instrument stability.

162

Analysis of the SCFAs was conducted by using Trace GC-MS system coupled

163

with a Trisplus automated sampler, an Ultra GC and a quadrupole DSQ II MS (Thermo

164

Finnigan, San Jose, CA). Separation was conducted with a TR-Wax column (30 m ×

165

0.32 mm × 0.25 μm, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). SCFAs were analyzed

166

under the following conditions: injector temperature at 230 °C, ion source and interface

167

temperature at 250 °C; initial oven temperature at 90 °C, temperature increased to

168

150 °C at 15 °C / min, to 170 °C at 5 °C/min and finally to 250 °C at 20 °C / min and

169

maintain for 2 min (total time 14 min). Helium was used as carrier gas at 1 mL/min.

170

The detector was operated in electron impact ionization mode (electron energy 70 eV),

171

scanning the 30 - 350 m/z range. Identification of the SCFAs was conducted according

9

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

172

to the retention time of standard compounds based on the NIST 08 and Wiley7N

173

libraries. Three independent replicate extractions were performed per sample.

174

DNA extraction

175

One milliliter fermentation for each LP-As fraction was stored at -80 °C before

176

DNA isolation. Total DNA was isolated by using the PowerMag Soil DNA isolation

177

kit optimized for epMotion (Mo Bio Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to

178

the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples stored at -80 °C were thawed and centrifuged

179

at 13000 rpm for 10 mins. Precipitate was homogenized and transferred into the Lysing

180

Matrix E tube for the DNA extraction.

181

16S rRNA sequencing

182

For 16S rRNA sequencing, the V3–V4 region of 16S rRNA gene was amplified

183

by PCR using the universal bacterial primers: 341F(CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG) and

184

806R (GGACTACHVGGGTATCTAAT) and then sequenced by using 500 bp paired-

185

end sequencing (Illumina MiSeq). For shotgun metagenomic sequencing, libraries were

186

sequenced by using 50 bp single-read sequencing (Illumina HiSeq). 32-33

187

Sequence processing and community analysis

188

Sequences were processed with Mothur v.1.39.1 according to the MiSeq SOP

189

using the described 454 standard operating procedure (SOP).34-35 All OTUs were

190

clustered at a cutoff of 0.02 (98% similarity) and classified using the Ribosomal DNA

191

Project (RDP) database (v9).36 Heat maps and bar plots were created in R using the

192

packages vegan and ggplots.37-38

193

For PICRUSt, we normalized the OTU results by subsampling to the lowest

10

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 10 of 32

Page 11 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

194

sequence count (3,500 OTUs/sample). This table was input into the QIIME pipeline,

195

which was used to reference the Greengenes 16S rRNA database (v9), the required

196

input for PICRUSt.39 Subsequently, OTUs were normalized by 16S rRNA copy number,

197

and metagenomes were predicted based on the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and

198

Genomes (KEGG) catalogue.40 HUMAnN was used to predict downstream pathway

199

coverage based on the KEGG Ortholog results.41

200

Statistical Analysis

201

The data was presented as mean ± SD (n = 3) and evaluated by one-way analysis

202

of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Duncan’s test. All statistical analyses were

203

carried out using R statistical package and SPSS for Windows, Version 17.0 (SPSS

204

Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

205 206

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

207

Microscopic observation and molecular weight distribution

208

The microscopic observation of the simulated salivary, gastric and intestinal

209

digestion solutions of LP-As was showed in Fig. 1A. The remarkable aggregation of

210

LP-A4 molecules has been observed after simulated gastric digestion for 2 hours,

211

compared with LP-A6 and LP-A8. Furthermore, the precipitate formed in gastric

212

digestion disappeared in the next intestinal digestion, which might due to the changing

213

of pH value. According to our previous study, there is a large amount of uronic acids

214

in the molecules of LP-A4 (89.64 ± 2.27%).24 Considering that the ionization of

215

mannuronic acid and glucuronic acid in LP-A4 molecules could be inhibited by the

11

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

216

sharply increased concentration of H+ in simulated gastric digestion solution, the

217

intermolecular repulsive force of the macromolecular was weaker, thus stimulated the

218

LP-A4 gathering of precipitation, decreasing the stability of the solution system.42

219

As presented in Fig. 1B, HPSEC profiles with the static light scattering signals

220

(SLS 90◦) indicate that there were no significant changes in molecular weight

221

distribution of LP-As after simulated salivary (SSD) and gastric (SGD) digestion.

222

However, the HPSEC profile of LP-A4 in gastric digestion couldn’t be recorded in this

223

experiment, because LP-A4 molecules gathered and precipitated in gastric digestion

224

solution revealed by the results of microscopic observation.

225

During the simulated intestinal digestion (SIG), the average Mw of LP-A6

226

decreased slightly from 1.959±0.06×106 g/mol to 5.244±1.92×105 g/mol after 2-hour

227

digestion. The same downtrends could be found in the average Mw of LP-A8, which

228

decreased from 1.332±0.32×106 g/mol to 1.109±0.60×106 g/mol after digestion, but

229

there was no distinct variety in molecular weight distribution of LP-A4 after intestinal

230

digestion. The different digestive characteristics of LP-As might indicate the possible

231

connection between structure feature and digestibility. Compared with LP-A4, LP-A6

232

and LP-A8 revealed a denser interconnected macromolecule network with higher

233

content of sulfate and more branched sugar residue, which would be easier to trap the

234

enzyme molecules in pancreatin and expose more cutting site for the enzyme digestion.

235

24

236

SCFA Production during the in vitro Fermentation

237

Short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) are the major products of bacterial metabolism in

12

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 12 of 32

Page 13 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

238

the large intestine and colon, which mainly come from the breakdown of polysaccharide

239

and are beneficial to human health. Acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid and

240

isobutyric acid were the main fermentation products in fecal (Fig. 2).

241

The fermentation of LP-A8 in group HL (hyper-lipid control) produced

242

significantly higher concentrations of acetic acid (34.46 ± 1.37 mmol/L), butyric acid

243

(22.24 ± 1.07 mmol/L), isobutyric acid (12.73 ± 0.39 mmol/L), valeric acid (1.56 ± 0.26

244

mmol/L) and total SCFA (78.35 ± 2.44 mmol/L) compared with the blank (p < 0.05).

245

Furthermore, the concentration of acetic acid (26.60 ± 0.64 mmol/L), propionic acid

246

(14.32 ± 0.87 mmol/L) and total SCFA (58.96 ± 3.47 mmol/L) were notably increased

247

in group NL (normal-lipid control) by the intervention of LP-A8 compared with the

248

blank (p < 0.05). At the same time, the fermentation of LP-A8 in both groups generated

249

more acetic acid, propionic acid and total SCFA than LP-A4 and LP-A6. Propionic acid

250

in the fermentation of group HL treated with LP-A8 was significantly decreased from

251

7.64 ± 0.54 mmol/L (blank) to 5.81 ± 0.40 mmol/L (p < .05). Significant decreasing

252

was also observed between the blank and LP-A4 or LP-A6 treatment of group NL in

253

the amount of isobutyric acid. In particular, treatment of LP-A4 and LP-A6 led to

254

increases in the concentration of butyric acid and isovaleric acid in both group HL and

255

group NL, and also the total SCFAs in group HL, compared with the blank.

256

Recently, many host metabolic pathways have been found to be linked to dietary

257

fiber and gut microbiota. Numerous published papers have proved that SCFAs, the final

258

fermentation products of the anaerobic intestinal microbiota, are beneficial to the host

259

energy metabolism by upregulating expression of host SCFA receptors and target

13

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

260

molecules in metabolic tissues. GPR109A is expressed in adipose tissues and activated

261

adipose tissue macrophages where it regulates lipid homeostasis, which was first

262

identified as a receptor for niacin and is mainly activated by β-hydroxybutryate and

263

butyrate.43-44 Furthermore, SCFAs inhibited isoproterenol-induced lipolysis in a

264

concentration-dependent manner in mouse 3T3-L1-derived adipocytes.45 GPR43, also

265

named as FFAR2 has been identified as a receptor of SCFA and is activated by acetate

266

and propionate followed by butyrate.46-47 FFAR2 is expressed in intestinal endocrine L-

267

cells, which could be activated by SCFAs and result in the inhibition of fat

268

accumulation.48 In this study, acetate and butyrate were the most abundant SCFAs in

269

group NL, and their generation was upregulated sharply by LP-A8, which might reveal

270

that LP-A8 have some beneficial effects on the host lipid metabolism. These data also

271

indicated that fermentation of different kinds of LP-As by human gut microbiota in HL

272

and NL groups promoted the generation of different SCFAs, which might then change

273

the microbiota composition in different rules.

274

Taxonomic composition of gut microbiota

275

We plotted average relative abundance of microbiota composition in the

276

fermentation products of LP-As in group NL and HL at order, family, genus and species

277

level (Fig. 3).

278

Proportions of four frequently detected orders including Gram-negative

279

Bacteroidales (Bacteroidetes phylum) and Enterobacteriales (Proteobacteria phylum),

280

Gram-positive Clostridiales and Lactobacillales (all from Firmicutes phylum), totaled

281

up to ~90% of the entire community (Fig. 3A). Moreover, there were some differences

14

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 14 of 32

Page 15 of 32

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

282

between group NL and HL gut microbiota contents. Gram-positive Clostridiales and

283

Lactobacillales were mainly observed in the gut microbiota of hyperlipidemic patients

284

(group HL), while Gram-negative Bacteroidales and Enterobacteriales were the

285

principal orders in the gut microbiota of healthy donors (group NL). The relative

286

abundance of Clostridiales was significantly increased by the treatment of LP-As in

287

group HL(P