Investigation of the Best Approach for Assessing Human Exposure to

Oct 10, 2017 - Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), including fluorotelomer alcohols (FTOHs), perfluoroalkyl sulfonamidoethanols (FOSEs), and ...
0 downloads 13 Views 2MB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF CAMBRIDGE

Article

INVESTIGATION OF THE BEST APPROACH FOR ASSESSING HUMAN EXPOSURE TO POLY- AND PERFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES THROUGH INDOOR AIR Juan A. Padilla-Sánchez, Eleni Papadopoulou, Somrutai Poothong, and Line S. Haug Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03516 • Publication Date (Web): 10 Oct 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on October 11, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 21

Environmental Science & Technology

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

INVESTIGATION OF THE BEST APPROACH FOR ASSESSING HUMAN EXPOSURE TO POLY- AND PERFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES THROUGH INDOOR AIR Juan A. Padilla-Sánchez*, Eleni Papadopoulou, Somrutai Poothong, Line S. Haug Department of Environmental Exposure and Epidemiology, Domain of Infection Control and Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. Box 4404 Nydalen, NO0403 Oslo, Norway.

13

Abstract

14

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), including fluorotelomer alcohols (FTOHs),

15

perfluoroalkyl sulfonamidoethanols (FOSEs) and perfluoroalkyl sulfonamides (FOSAs) were

16

assessed in 61 residential indoor air and 15 personal air samples collected in Oslo area,

17

Norway.

18

FTOHs were detected in all samples, and the median concentrations in residential indoor air

19

were 2970, 10400 and 3120 pg m-3 for 6:2, 8:2 and 10:2 FTOH, respectively. This is similar

20

to or higher than previously reported in studies from the same geographical area and

21

worldwide. FOSEs and FOSAs were detected in 49–70% and 7–13% of the residential indoor

22

air samples, respectively.

23

The median FTOH concentrations observed in personal air were 1970, 7170, and 1590 pg m-3

24

for 6:2, 8:2 and 10:2 FTOH, respectively, which is 30 to 50% lower than the median

25

concentrations in residential indoor air. No FOSEs or FOSAs were detected above the method

26

detection limit (MDL) in the personal air samples.

27

Intakes of perfluorohexanoate (PFHxA), perfluoroheptanoate (PFHpA), perfluorooctanoate

28

(PFOA), perfluorononanoate (PFNA), perfluorodecanoate (PFDA), perfluoroundecanoate

29

(PFUnDA) and perfluorooctyl sulfonate (PFOS) through inhalation and biotransformation of

30

PFAS precursors in air were estimated. Median intakes of 1.7, 0.17, 5.7, 0.57, 1.8, 0.18 and

31

2.3 pg kg bw-1 day-1, were obtained in residential indoor air, while 1.0, 0.10, 3.3, 0.33, 0.88

32

and 0.09 pg kg bw-1 day-1 were found in personal air for PFHxA, PFHpA, PFOA, PFNA,

33

PFDA, PFUnDA and PFOS, respectively. The median PFOA intakes from residential indoor

34

air (5.7 pg kg bw-1 day-1) and personal air (3.3 pg kg bw-1 day-1) were both around five orders

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 2 of 21

35

of magnitude lower than the tolerable daily intake (TDI) reported by the European Food

36

Safety Authority (EFSA).

37

Keywords:

PFOS,

PFOA,

intakes,

biotransformation,

personal

air.

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 21

Environmental Science & Technology

38

INTRODUCTION

39

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are highly versatile substances and are frequently

40

used in consumer products such as in water and oil proofing agents, in inks, varnishes, waxes,

41

lubricants, leather, paper, textiles, and fluoropolymers, due to their unique physicochemical

42

properties (1,2). The release of PFASs from consumer products to the indoor environment can

43

represent an important human exposure source (1). Perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and

44

perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) are the most frequently studied PFASs and their occurrence in

45

wildlife and humans has been thoroughly described. For both PFOA and PFOS toxic effects have

46

been observed in several types of animals (2-4). Further, many epidemiological studies have been

47

reporting associations between exposure to these compounds and health effects (5,6).

48

Increasing concern about PFASs have led to several measures taken by public bodies and

49

industry. PFOS and its salts were included in the list of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)

50

under Stockholm Convention in 2009 (7). In 2006, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

51

(U.S. EPA) together with eight fluoropolymer and fluorotelomer manufacturers, launched a

52

PFOA stewardship program with the aim to eliminate emissions of perfluoroalkyl carboxylic

53

acids (PFCAs), their precursors and products by 2015 (8). In addition, PFOA has been included

54

in the Candidate List of Substances of Very High Concern for Authorization in the European

55

Union (EU) under the REACH regulation (9). These measures were thought to lead to a

56

substantial decrease in the human body burdens of PFOA and PFOS. However, previous studies

57

have found that the decline in PFOA concentrations in human blood was not according to its

58

observed half-life, thus indicating additional indirect sources of human exposure to PFASs (10).

59

One possible indirect exposure pathway could be exposure to volatile PFAS precursors, such as

60

fluorotelomer alcohols (FTOHs), perfluorooctane sulfonamides (FOSAs) and perfluorooctane

61

sulfonamidoethanols (FOSEs) through indoor air, and subsequent biotransformation in the human

62

body. Biotransformation of FTOHs to PFOA have been reported in rats (11) as well as in animal

63

and human cells (12), while other studies have reported biotransformation of FOSAs and FOSEs

64

to PFOS (13,14).

65

Several studies have reported the occurrence of FTOHs, FOSAs and FOSEs in indoor air

66

worldwide (15-21). In these studies, sample collection was performed in specific places, such as

67

homes, offices, or shops, using active or passive stationary air samplers placed at the same point

68

during the entire collection period, which might not be representative of all PFASs exposure 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 4 of 21

69

through air. To our knowledge, no studies have evaluated how well these fixed point samplers

70

represent the actual exposure, as we are usually spending our days in several different places, for

71

instance at work, in public or private transport, sport centers, homes, etc. Type and number of

72

consumer products might vary between these places and exposure could thus vary substantially

73

(22,23). To gain knowledge on this, different sampling approaches should be compared in order

74

to provide more reliable information about PFASs exposure through indoor air.

75

The overall aim of this study was to determine and compare the concentrations of volatile PFASs

76

in residential indoor air and personal air samples. To achieve this, sixty-one residential indoor air

77

and fifteen personal air samples were collected by placing stationary air samplers in houses and

78

attaching personal samplers to the participants, respectively, during 24h. Differences and

79

correlations between sampling methods were evaluated, and based on the determined

80

concentrations the human exposure to selected PFASs through indoor air was evaluated.

81 82

MATERIAL AND METHODS

83

Chemicals Volatile PFASs, 6:2 FTOH, 8:2 FTOH 10:2 FTOH, MeFOSA, EtFOSA, MeFOSE

84

and EtFOSE were included in this study. Further information on these compounds is found in the

85

supporting information (SI), in the “Chemicals and reagents” section.

86

Study population. This study is part of a comprehensive sampling campaign that has been

87

thoroughly described elsewhere (24). In brief, a study group of 61 adults, males and females,

88

from Oslo, Norway was recruited and a wide variety of environmental and biological samples

89

were collected from the participants and their houses. This included house dust and air samples,

90

hand wipes, foods and drinks, blood, urine, saliva, nails, and hair. In addition, detailed

91

information on dietary habits, the indoor domestic environment, and other lifestyle characteristics

92

of the participant was collected through questionnaires. The sampling campaign was conducted

93

from November 2013 to April 2014.

94

Collection of air samples. Residential indoor air samples were collected by connecting four

95

parallel ENV + cartridges (200 mg, 6 mL) to a SKC Leland Legacy low volume pump (SKC Inc.,

96

Eight Four, PA, USA). The low volume pump was placed in participants' living rooms and

97

programmed to collect air for 24 h. The flow rate was set at 5 L min−1, resulting in a total air

98

volume of 7.2 m3. When the sampling equipment was installed (samplers were placed

99

approximately 1.2 m above the floor), doors, windows, stoves and display screens surroundings 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 21

Environmental Science & Technology

100

were avoided. Sample collection was conducted during the winter period when the proportion of

101

time spent indoors is at a maximum and ventilation is at its minimum.

102

Personal air samples were collected using one ENV+ cartridge (1000 mg and 25 mL, Biotage,

103

Uppsala, Sweden) connected to a low volume SKC pump 224-PCMTX4 (SKC Inc., Eight Four,

104

PA, USA) at 1 L min−1 flow rate. A total air volume of 1.44 m3 was collected. The pump was

105

placed in a backpack that accompanied the participants throughout the 24 h sampling period. The

106

air sampler was attached to the participant's shoulder and participants were advised to keep the

107

sampler close to their face during the entire 24 h sampling event, including sleeping hours. Due

108

to sampling design limitations only 15 personal air samples, out of 61, were available for PFASs

109

analysis. SPE cartridges used as samplers were stored in -20°C until analysis. Additional

110

information on the sampling procedure can be found in Papadopoulou et al. 2016 (24).

111

To get an indication of the exposure to volatile PFASs at workplace, triplicate air samples were

112

collected in two offices in two consecutive days using the described method for residential indoor

113

air collection.

114

Analysis and quality assurance.

115

The method used for sample preparation and analysis is thoroughly described in the SI.

116

Internal standards (ISs) were added to the sample cartridges before analysis. 13C 6:2 FTOH, 13C

117

8:2 FTOH,

118

MeFOSA was used as IS for MeFOSA and EtFOSA while d-N-MeFOSE was used as IS for

119

MeFOSE and EtFOSE.

120

Breakthrough was tested before the sampling campaign started, by coupling two SPE cartridges

121

in series and spiking the top cartridge with a high amount of internal standards. Subsequently, air

122

was drawn through the cartridges for 24h at a flow of 5 L min-1. No major losses were observed

123

for the analytes studied (see SI and Figure S1 of the SI).

124

Flow rates for both personal and residential indoor air were measured both at the beginning and

125

end of sampling and in each sampling site, in order to check that the flow was constant. In

126

addition, since personal pumps required a manually battery change by researchers within the 24h

127

sampling period, the flow rate was also measured before and after the battery change.

128

Three field blanks, i.e. cartridges brought along with cartridges used for sample collection but not

129

connected to the pump, were collected in order to assess possible contamination during transport

130

to/from sampling sites. These field blanks and one procedural blank were analyzed with each

13

C 10:2 FTOH were used as IS for 6:2, 8:2 and 10:2 FTOH, respectively. d-N-

5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 6 of 21

131

batch of samples. Low concentrations of 6:2 FTOH (in more than 50% of blanks) and 8:2 FTOH

132

(in 100% of blanks) were observed, with procedural blanks showing higher concentrations than

133

field blanks for 8:2 FTOH. As air samples and field blanks were collected with SPE cartridges

134

from the same lot number, it was decided to discard the results for the procedural blanks taken

135

from a different lot number. Concentrations measured in the samples were subtracted by the

136

mean concentration of all analyzed field blanks.

137 138

Intake estimations. An inhalation rate of 13.3 m3 day-1 was used, and the absorption of FTOHs

139

and MeFOSE through lungs was assumed to be 100%, as was previously suggested for PFOA

140

(2). Indirect exposure to PFCAs through biotransformation of FTOHs was estimated using the

141

concentrations obtained for 6:2 FTOH, 8:2 FTOH and 10:2 FTOH in residential indoor air and

142

personal air. Intakes of PFHxA and PFHpA were estimated from 6:2 FTOH, PFOA and PFNA

143

from 8:2 FTOH, and PFDA and PFUnDA from 10:2 FTOH. There is indication that 8:2 FTOH

144

may also be biodegraded to PFHxA, but the biotransformation factor is unknown and likely very

145

low (25). Thus, this transformation of 8:2 FTOH to PFHxA and similarly 10:2 FTOH to PFOA

146

has not been considered. Indirect exposure to PFOS was estimated using the results obtained for

147

MeFOSE. A biotransformation rate of 8:2 FTOH to PFOA of 0.003 was used (26). Further, based

148

on studies finding the biotransformation of 8:2 FTOH to PFNA being approximately one order of

149

magnitude lower than 8:2 FTOH to PFOA (25), a biotransformation rate of 0.0003 was used for

150

8:2 FTOH to PFNA. Biotransformation rates for 6:2 FTOH and 10:2 FTOH has not yet been

151

reported. Thus, the same rates as for 8:2 FTOH were used, i.e. 6:2 FTOH to PFHxA and PFHpA

152

was set to 0.003 and 0.0003, respectively, while 10:2 FTOH to PFDA and PFUnDA was set to

153

0.003 and 0.0003, respectively. A biotransformation rate of MeFOSE to PFOS of 0.1 was used

154

based on the assumption that the transformation rate of EtFOSE to PFOS is the same as for

155

MeFOSE to PFOS(27).

156

Statistical analysis. PFAS concentrations in residential indoor air and personal air samples were

157

presented using descriptive statistics. Only compounds with detection frequency >50% (i.e.,

158

FTOHs and MeFOSE in residential indoor air, and FTOHs in personal air) were included in

159

further statistical analyses. All non-detects were replaced by half of the method detection limit

160

(MDL) reported for this compound.

6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 21

Environmental Science & Technology

161

Since all concentrations failed the Shapiro-Wilk test of normality, Spearman’s rank correlation

162

was used to assess correlations and Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to test differences

163

between residential indoor air and personal air concentrations. The significance level was set to

164

p=0.05. Scatter plots were used to graphically present associations. SPSS v.22 (Chicago, IL,

165

USA) was used for the statistical analyses.

166 167 168

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

169 170

PFAS concentrations in residential indoor air. FTOHs were detected in all samples and the

171

concentrations ranged from 604 pg m-3 (6:2 FTOH) to 446000 pg m-3 (8:2 FTOH) (Figure 1a and

172

Table S2). Median concentrations for 6:2, 8:2 and 10:2-FTOHs were 2970, 10400, and 3120,

173

respectively. MeFOSE was observed in 70% of the samples with concentrations ranging from

174