Subscriber access provided by University of Florida | Smathers Libraries
Article
Lignin Alkylation Enhances Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass Chenhuan Lai, Maobing Tu, Changlei Xia, Zhiqiang Shi, Shao-Long Sun, Qiang Yong, and Shiyuan Yu Energy Fuels, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b02405 • Publication Date (Web): 19 Oct 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on October 21, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Energy & Fuels is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 34
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
1
Lignin Alkylation Enhances Enzymatic Hydrolysis
2
of Lignocellulosic Biomass
3
Chenhuan Lai,†,§ Maobing Tu,*,‡,§ Changlei Xia,‡ Zhiqiang Shi,§ Shaolong Sun,‡,┴ Qiang Yong,†
4
and Shiyuan Yu†
5
†
College of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210037, China
6
‡
Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati,
7
Ohio 45221, USA
8
§
9
Auburn, Alabama 36849, USA
Forest Products Laboratory and Center for Bioenergy and Bioproducts, Auburn University,
10
┴
11
Guangzhou, Guangdong 510642, China
12
* Corresponding author
13
Email address:
[email protected] 14
Fax: +1 513 556 2259; Tel: +1 513 556 4162
College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University,
15 16 1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 2 of 34
1
ABSTRACT: Understanding the interactions between lignin and cellulase will help better
2
design biomass pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis processes. Ethanol organosolv lignins
3
(EOLs) were isolated from organosolv pretreatment of sweetgum (SG) and loblolly pine (LP)
4
under different temperature. The structural changes of EOLs were determined by 13C NMR and
5
Heteronuclear multiple bond correlation (HMBC) NMR to elucidate their positive and/or
6
negative effects on enzymatic hydrolysis. Alkylation of lignin with ethanol resulting in the
7
etherification of Cα was observed in both EOL-SG and EOL-LP. The effect of EOL-SG on
8
enzymatic hydrolysis was correlated with the content of ethoxyl group. The lignin alkylation in
9
EOLs appeared to be reversible at high temperature, resulting in the inverse change of their
10
effects on enzymatic hydrolysis. A strong correlation was observed between the binding affinity
11
of cellulases onto EOLs and their corresponding hydrolysis yields. Lignin alkylation likely
12
reduce the affinity of enzyme onto lignin, which can enhance the enzymatic hydrolysis.
13
KEYWORDS: adsorption, biomass, enzymatic hydrolysis, organosolv lignin, pretreatment
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 3 of 34
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
1
1. INTRODUCTION
2
Lignocellulosic biomass, as a renewable resource, is the most abundantly available feedstock. It
3
has a great potential to produce biofuels, and valuable chemicals.1-4 However, the biorefinery of
4
lignocelluloses is not cost effective, mainly because producing fermentable sugars from
5
lignocellulosic biomass is costly and inefficient. The influential factors affecting the enzymatic
6
digestibility of lignocelluloses have been studied, such as the presence of lignin and
7
hemicellulose in biomass, the degree of polymerization and crystallinity of cellulose, or
8
accessible surface areas.5 Lignin is a crosslinked polymer with different phenylpropane units in
9
biomass, which cements the celluloses in the plant cell wall, and limits the enzyme accessibility,
10
by physically blocking the enzyme attack and non-productive binding of the cellulase enzyme.6-8
11
It has been widely accepted that the lignin in biomass played a negative role in enzymatic
12
hydrolysis and increased the cellulase cost to achieve the high sugar yields.9
13
To understand the mechanism of lignin inhibition, the physicochemical properties and
14
chemical structures of lignin, which might impact the enzymatic hydrolysis, have been examined,
15
including hydrophobicity, surface charges, phenolic hydroxyl group contents, carbonyl group
16
contents, and degree of condensation.10-13 The characteristics of lignin in pretreated biomass
17
varied considerably with the types of biomass and the pretreatment methods. The composition of
18
three phenol building blocks (p-hydroxyphenyl, guaiacyl, and syringyl) differs in the lignin of
19
softwood, hardwood and herbaceous plants.14 More importantly, lignin structures are altered
20
significantly during the thermochemical pretreatment. A decrease in the percentage of β-O-4
21
bonds, but an increase in the percentage of C-C condensed structures were observed in lignins
22
after pretreatment, which indicated that lignin depolymerization and repolymerization reactions
23
occurred simultaneously.15 It has been reported that the more condensed lignin tended to adsorb 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 4 of 34
1
more cellulases enzyme.16 The phenolic hydroxyl groups in lignin might be the necessary sites
2
for the enzyme nonproductive adsorption and enzyme inactivation.17, 18 By contrast, the
3
carboxylic groups in lignin could enhance the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated lignocellulose,
4
by increasing the electrostatic repulsion to enzymes.19 However, a clear understanding of lignin
5
structure-inhibition/stimulation relationship on enzymatic hydrolysis is lacking.6, 20, 21
6
Organosolv pretreatment is one the promising pretreatment processes for softwood and
7
hardwood, which can enhance the substrates hydrolyzability and produce high purity of lignin.22,
8
23
9
organosolv process.24 During the process, the solubilized organosolv lignin could be precipitated
Cleavage of α-aryl ether and β-aryl ether has been suggested to the major reaction in the
10
out from the spent liquor by adding water.25, 26 Recently, certain EOL has been observed to
11
enhance the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic substrates considerably.13, 27 Effect of EOLs on
12
enzymatic hydrolysis was suggested to be controlled by lignin hydrophobicity and negative zeta
13
potentials.28 Lignin hydrophobicity and zeta potential are further governed by lignin structures
14
and functional groups. However, which lignin structures and functional groups are responsible
15
for EOLs inhibition and/or stimulation has not been fully understood. Furthermore, which
16
reactions are accountable for the positive effect of EOLs from organosolv process has not been
17
explored.
18
Acid catalyzed alkylation of lignin with methanol or ethanol at 30°C has been reported, in
19
which the methylene proton of ethoxyl group was observed at δH 3.4 ppm.29 Liberation of
20
phenolic groups has also been observed in alkylation of spruce lignin.29 Early research also
21
demonstrated that extensive methylation took place in alkylation of lignin with alcoholic
22
hydrochloric acid and suggested the etherification of benzyl alcohol groups or the re-
23
etherification of benzyl ether group was the main reaction under mild conditions (20-30°C) for 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 5 of 34
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
1
solvent pretreatment with acids. In the organosolv pretreatment, the condition was much severe
2
(160–190°C). As a result, the reactions could be different and more complicated. The alcohols
3
have been proposed to have a significant effect on acidic delignification processes.30 The lignin
4
condensation reactions predominating under acidic conditions were reduced substantially by the
5
addition of solvents. 2-naphthol has also been found to suppress the lignin condensation in steam
6
explosion pretreatment of aspen,15 in which 2-naphthol was suggested to react with Cα in lignin.
7
In a catalytic depolymerization of lignin process (>350°C)under supercritical ethanol, ethanol
8
has been also found to suppress the lignin condensation though O-alkylation and C-alkylation
9
capping reactions.31 It is hypothesized that alkylation of lignin with ethanol occurs in organosolv
10
pretreatment processes, and this alkylation of lignin suppresses lignin condensation and results in
11
positive of effect of EOLs.
12
The primary goal of this study is to investigate the effect of lignin alkylation on enzymatic
13
hydrolysis of cellulosic substrates and to elucidate the structural and functional groups changes
14
in EOLs and their influence on enzymatic hydrolysis. A series of EOLs were produced from
15
organosolv pretreatment of sweetgum and loblolly pine under different temperature (160-200 °C).
16
Effect of pretreatment temperature on the alkylation reactions between ethanol and lignin was
17
examined by 13C, HSQC and HMBC NMR. The physicochemical properties of lignin, including
18
hydrophobicity, surface charge, and molecular weight (Mw), and the binding affinity of lignins
19
with enzymes were examined as well. The stimulatory or inhibitory effects of EOLs on
20
enzymatic hydrolysis of Avicel and pretreated biomass were correlated to the ethoxyl groups in
21
alkylated lignins.
22
5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
1
Page 6 of 34
2. MTERIALS AND MEHTODS
2
2.1. Organosolv Pretreated Biomass Preparation. Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
3
wood chips and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) wood chips with the size of 1.0 × 1.0 cm (L × W)
4
were collected by Forest Products Laboratory at Auburn University. Organosolv pretreated
5
sweetgum (OPSG) was prepared in a 1.0 L Parr batch reactor as described previously.13 Briefly,
6
sweetgum wood chips (80 g) soaked in 25% ethanol solution with 1.0% (w/w) sulfuric acid
7
overnight in a solid to liquid ratio of 1:7. After that, the wood chips with solution were loaded
8
into the reactor and pretreated at 160 °C for 1 h. For organosolv pretreatment of loblolly pine
9
(OPLP), wood chips were pretreated similarly in 75% ethanol solution at 170 °C for 1 h. After
10
pretreatment, the reactor was cooled down in a water bath. The pretreated substrate was collected
11
by filtration, washed with 95% ethanol solution at room temperature three times (1:10 of
12
solid/liquid), and followed by at least three times water washing.
13
2.2. Ethanol Organosolv Lignin Preparation. To prepare EOLs from sweetgum (EOL-SG),
14
four kinds of spent liquor were collected from organosolv pretreatment of sweetgum with 75%
15
ethanol and 1.0% sulfuric acid, at 160, 170, 180, and 190 °C for 1 h, respectively. EOLs were
16
precipitated by adding 3-fold volumes of water into the organosolv spent liquor. The precipitated
17
EOLs were collected by filtration on Whatman No. 1 filter paper and washed three times with
18
warm water. Similarly, four EOLs from loblolly pine (EOL-LP) were collected from organosolv
19
pretreatment of loblolly pine with 75% ethanol and 1.0% sulfuric acid, at 170, 180, 190, and 200
20
°C for 1 h, respectively. The EOL was designated based on the biomass name and pretreatment
21
temperature. For example, EOL from organosolv pretreatment of sweetgum at 160 °C was
22
designated as EOL-SG160.
6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 34
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
1
Energy & Fuels
2.3. Cellulase Enzymes. Commercial cellulase, Novozym 22C, was provided from
2
Novozymes (Franklinton, NC), and used for enzymatic hydrolysis of Avicel (pure cellulose),
3
OPSG, and OPLP (pretreated substrates). The filter paper enzyme activity of Novozym 22C was
4
100 FPUmL-1, determined by using Whatman NO. 1 filter paper as the substrate;32 and the β-
5
glucosidase activity of Novozym 22C was 343 IUmL-1, determined by using p-nitrophenyl-β-D-
6
glucoside as the substrate.33 Cellulase from Trichoderma reesei ATCC 26921 was purchased
7
from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) and only used for cellulase adsorption isotherm
8
determination.
9
2.4. Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Avicel, OPSG and OPLP with the Addition of Various
10
EOLs. Enzymatic hydrolysis was performed in 50 mL of 50 mM sodium citrate buffer (pH 4.8)
11
at 2% glucan (w/v) with commercial enzyme (Novozym 22C) as previously described.13 In brief,
12
the hydrolysis reaction was performed at 50 °C and 150 rpm for 72 h. The enzyme loading of
13
Novozym 22C was 5.0 FPUg-1 glucan in enzymatic hydrolysis of Avicel and OPSG, but 10.0
14
FPUg-1 glucan in enzymatic hydrolysis of OPLP. To investigate the effects of EOLs on
15
enzymatic hydrolysis, EOLs were added into the enzymatic hydrolysis system prior to the
16
enzyme addition. In detail, 4 gL-1 EOLs were added to a mixture of the substrates and citrate
17
buffer, and then incubated for 1 h at room temperature. After that, the enzyme was added to
18
initiate the enzymatic hydrolysis. To examine the substrate digestibility, the samples were taken
19
from the hydrolysis solution at various time intervals. The glucose and xylose content was
20
determined by HPLC with Aminex HPX-87P column. The hydrolysis yield of the substrates was
21
calculated from the released glucose content, as a percentage of the theoretical sugars available
22
in the substrates. Initial hydrolysis rate was calculated based on the released glucose in the first 3
7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
1
h of enzymatic hydrolysis. Enzymatic hydrolysis was carried out in duplicate, and each data
2
point was presented as the average of two replicates.
3
Page 8 of 34
2.5. Enzyme Adsorption Isotherm. To examine the affinity of cellulases on EOL samples,
4
cellulase C2730 (protein content 41 mgmL-1) with low β-glucosidase content was used. Cellulase
5
C2730 was incubated with 2% (w/w) lignin at 4 °C and 150 rpm for 3 h. A range of enzyme
6
concentration was used from 0.01 to 0.4 mgmL-1. After reaching equilibrium, the sample was
7
taken to determine the protein content in the supernatant by Bradford assay as free enzyme
8
content in the enzymatic hydrolysis solution. The adsorbed enzyme was calculated from the
9
difference between the initial enzyme content and the free enzyme content. The classical
10
Langmuir adsorption isotherm (Γ=ΓmaxKC/(1+KC)) was used to fit the cellulase enzyme
11
adsorption on substrates. Where, Γmax is the surface concentration of protein at full coverage
12
(mgg-1 substrate); K is the Langmuir constant (mLmg-1); and C is the free enzyme content in
13
solution (mgmL-1). Moreover, the distribution coefficient (R) can be expressed as R= ΓmaxK.
14
2.6. EOLs Surface Hydrophobicity Determination. The surface hydrophobicity of EOLs
15
was estimated by the Rose Bengal (hydrophobic dye) adsorption method.13, 34 To mimic the
16
enzymatic hydrolysis conditions, Rose Bengal was mixed with EOL at pH 4.8, 50 °C, and 150
17
rpm for 2 h. The concentration of Rose Bengal was fixed at 40 mgL-1, while the concentration of
18
EOL was in a range of 2–10 gL-1. The hydrophobic dye, Rose Bengal, could be adsorbed on the
19
lignin surface through hydrophobic interaction. The free dye content in the supernatant was
20
determined by measuring the absorbance at 543 nm using a UV-Vis spectrometer. The content of
21
adsorbed dye was calculated from the difference between the initial dye content and the free dye
22
content. The partition quotient (PQ) was calculated from the ratio of the adsorbed dye over the
8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 34
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
1
free dye. The obtained PQ was plotted against the corresponding lignin content. The slope from
2
the linear plot was defined as the surface hydrophobicity of lignin (Lg-1).
3
2.7. EOLs Surface Charge Determination. The surface charges of EOLs were determined
4
by the potentiometric titration.20 Briefly, lignin samples (120 mg) were firstly dissolved in 10.0 g
5
NaOH solution (0.1 M), then the solution was acidified with 3.0 g 1.0 M HCl and stirred for 10
6
min. After that, 30.0 g of 0.1 M NaOH was added to the solution to neutralize the acid and to re-
7
dissolve the lignin. The sample solution was titrated by 0.1 M HCl with the automatic titrator
8
(AUT-701, DKK-TOA) from pH 12 to 2. Blank solution (without lignin) was prepared and
9
titrated as well. The surface charges (mM g-1) on the lignin under pH 4.8 were calculated as
10
following: Q= (Vblank-Vsample) ×M/W, where Q is the surface charge (mM g-1), Vsample and Vblank
11
are the titration volume consumed by lignin sample solution and blank solution at pH 4.8
12
respectively, M is the mole concentration of HCl and W is the weight of lignin samples.
13
2.8. Acetylation of Ethanol Organosolv Lignin. The acetylation of EOLs (0.5 g) was
14
conducted in 6 mL pyridine-acetic anhydride (1:1, v/v) at room temperature, and stirred for 72 h.
15
The solution was added dropwise to 120 mL ice-cold water containing 1 mL concentrated HCl.
16
The precipitated acetylated lignin was extensively washed by water, and then collected on
17
Whatman No. 1 filter paper. The resultant acetylated lignin was air-dried in fume hood, and used
18
for lignin molecular weight determination and 1H NMR analysis.
19
2.9. EOLs Molecular Weight Determination. The acetylated EOLs were used in the
20
determination of their weight-average molecular weights (Mw) by gel permeation
21
chromatography (GPC) using an HPLC system equipped with three 4.6 mm × 300 mm Styragel
22
columns (HR5E, HR4, and HR2) (Waters, Milford, MA) in tandem, and a refractive index 9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
1
detector. The acetylated EOLs (1 mg) were dissolved in 1 mL HPLC-grade tetrahydrofuran
2
(THF), and 50 µL of sample injection volume. THF was used as eluent at a flow rate of 1
3
mLmin-1 operated at 35°C. The columns were calibrated with polystyrene standards.
4
Page 10 of 34
2.10. 1H NMR Analysis of EOLs. Functional groups (phenolic hydroxyl, aliphatic hydroxyl,
5
and methoxyl) of acetylated EOLs were estimated using 1H-NMR on a Bruker 400/600
6
spectrometer. Lignin acetate (50 mg) and p-nitrobenzaldehyde (NBA, 5 mg as internal standard)
7
were dissolved in 0.5 mL of CDCl3.35 The contents of functional groups were calculated from the
8
integration ratios of the protons of functional groups to the protons of the internal standard.
9
2.11. 13C NMR Analysis of EOLs. Quantitative 13C NMR employed a 90º pulse width, a 1.2
10
s acquisition time and a 1.7 s relaxation delay. Chromium (III) acetylacetonate (0.01 M) was
11
added to the solution to provide complete relaxation of all nuclei. Non-acetylated EOLs (120
12
mg) were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO-d6). A total of 20000 scans per sample were
13
collected.
14
2.12. 2D HMBC NMR Analysis of EOLs. Lignin samples (80 mg) were dissolved in 0.5
15
mL of DMSO-d6. The experiments were carried out at room temperature on a 400 MHz or 600
16
MHz Bruker Avance NMR spectrometer equipped with a cryoprobe. Matrices of 2048 × 256
17
data points were collected. The recycle delay was 1.5 sec with number of scans of 128. The
18
HMBC spectra were recorded via heteronuclear zero and double quantum coherence experiment
19
(HMBCgplpndqf sequence).
20
2.13. 2D HSQC NMR Analysis of EOLs. EOLs (60 mg) were dissolved in 0.5 mL of
21
deuterated dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO-d). HSQC spectra were recorded on a Bruker 600 MHz
10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11 of 34
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
1
Bruker Spectrometer using the pulse program “hsqcetgp” as described previously.28 The DMSO
2
solvent peak was used as an internal reference (δC 39.52, δH 2.50 ppm).
3
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4
3.1. Effects of EOLs on Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Avicel and Pretreated Substrates. To
5
examine the characteristic effects of EOLs, EOL-SG and EOL-LP lignins were added into the
6
enzymatic hydrolysis of Avicel, OPSG and OPLP (Figure 1). Four EOL-SG lignins showed
7
stimulatory effects on enzymatic hydrolysis of Avicel, OPSG and OPLP. EOL-SG lignins from
8
the lower pretreatment temperature resulted in better hydrolysis yields. By contrast, EOL-LP170
9
and 180 showed inhibitory effects on hydrolysis yields; EOL-LP190 and 200 showed stimulatory
10
effects. It was unexpected that higher pretreatment temperature resulted in the positive effects of
11
EOL-LP lignins on enzymatic hydrolysis.
12
Specifically, the addition of EOL-SG160, 170, 180 and 190 increased the 72 h hydrolysis
13
yield of Avicel by 5–8% (Figure1a). These four lignins also enhanced the 72 h hydrolysis yield
14
of OPSG by 10–36% (Figure 1b), and improved the 72 h hydrolysis yield of OPLP by 7–32%
15
(Figure 1c). This indicates that EOL-SG enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated biomass
16
better than pure cellulose, which is probably due to the residual lignin (11%) in OPSG and
17
OPLP. Remarkably, it was observed that EOL-SG from lower pretreatment temperature showed
18
much higher stimulation than those from higher temperature. For instance, EOL-SG160
19
increased the 72 h hydrolysis yield of OPSG by 36%, while EOL-SG190 increased it only by
20
12%. It is most likely that the physicochemical properties (such as hydrophobicity, functional
21
groups and surface charge) of EOL-SG changed at high temperature.
11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
Glucose yield / %
60
80
(a) EOL-SG/160 EOL-SG/170 EOL-SG/180 EOL-SG/190
60
40
20
0 12
24
36
48
60
20
(c) EOL-SG160 EOL-SG170 EOL-SG180 EOL-SG190
40
20
0
0
12
24
Time / h
36
48
60
72
0
12
24
36
48
60
72
Time / h
Time / h
Figure 1. Effects of EOL-SG on enzymatic hydrolysis of Avicel (a), OPSG (b), and OPLP (c). Avicel Avicel+ Avicel+ Avicel+ Avicel+
60
80
(a) EOL-LP170 EOL-LP180 EOL-LP190 EOL-LP200
OPSG OPSG+ OPSG+ OPSG+ OPSG+
60
40
20
0
80
(b) EOL-LP170 EOL-LP180 EOL-LP190 EOL-LP200
40
20
12
24
36
48
Time / h
60
72
40
20
0
0 0
(c)
OPLP OPLP+ EOL-LP170 OPLP+ EOL-LP180 OPLP+ EOL-LP190 OPLP+ EOL-LP200
60 Glucose yield / %
80
3
OPLP OPLP+ OPLP+ OPLP+ OPLP+
60
40
72
Glucose yield / %
2
80
(b) EOL-SG160 EOL-SG170 EOL-SG180 EOL-SG190
0
0
1
OPSG OPSG+ OPSG+ OPSG+ OPSG+
Glucose yield / %
Avicel Avicel+ Avicel+ Avicel+ Avicel+
Glucose yield / %
80
Glucose yield / %
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 12 of 34
0
12
24
36
48
60
72
Time / h
0
12
24
36
48
60
72
Time / h
4
Figure 2. Effects of EOL-LP on enzymatic hydrolysis of Avicel (a), OPSG (b), and OPLP (c).
5
By contrast, EOL-LP lignins (EOL-LP170, 180, 190, and 200) changed the 72 h hydrolysis
6
yields of Avicel from 60.5 (control) to 50.4, 58.6, 61.8, and 63.8%, respectively (Figure 2a).
7
Similarly, EOL-LP170 and 180 decreased the 72 h hydrolysis yields of OPSG and OPLP, but
8
EOL-LP190 and P200 increased those of OPSG and OPLP (Figure 2b and Figure 2c).
9
Unexpectedly, the higher pretreatment temperature (190 - 200 °C) changed the negative effects
10
of EOL-LP on enzymatic hydrolysis to be positive. This suggested that the higher temperature in
11
organosolv process changed the lignin structures and potentially increased the carboxylic acid
12
and ester functional groups in EOL-LP lignins resulting in positive effects (Tables S2 in
13
Supporting Information).
14
Similar results have been reported on the effects of wood extractives on enzymatic hydrolysis
15
of Avicel,36 in which it was observed that that the phenolic extractives from birch wood
16
increased the glucose yield by 7% and the phenolic extractives from pine wood decreased it by 12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 13 of 34
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
1
9%. It was suggested that these phenolic extractives are composed of lignin oligomers created by
2
steam explosion.36 They proposed that wood extractives can prevent nonproductive binding of
3
cellulase enzymes on to cellulose surface. Likewise, lignosulfonate has also been reported to
4
improve the 72 h hydrolysis yield of pretreated poplar by 26%.37 It was suggested that
5
lignosulfonate could reduce the nonproductive binding between enzymes and residual lignin via
6
electrostatic repulsion from the negative charged lignosulfonate groups. In this study, as the
7
pretreatment temperature increased, the positive effects of EOL-SG decreased, whereas the
8
negative effects of EOL-LP reduced. We believe that cellulase enzymes would adsorb onto
9
EOLs with two binding modes (tight binding and weak binding). The tight binding would result
10
in irreversible nonproductive binding, and the weak binding would stabilize cellulase enzyme
11
activity and reduce nonproductive binding between enzymes and cellulose/residual lignins. The
12
net effect of EOLs depends on the collective influence of tight binding and weak binding. These
13
two binding modes most likely are controlled by lignin hydrophobicity, surface charge and
14
functional groups.
15
3.2. Effects of Pretreatment Temperature on Lignin Structural Changes Revealed by
16
Quantitative 13C NMR. To understand the chemical structures of EOLs, 13C NMR and 2D
17
HMBC NMR were used to characterize EOL-SG and EOL-LP lignins.
13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 14 of 34
1 2
Figure3. Quantitative
3
SG190.
4
13
C NMR spectra of EOL-SG160, EOL-SG170, EOL-SG180 and EOL-
13
C NMR spectra showed a distinct methyl (CH3) peak at 15.4 ppm in EOL-SG lignins,
5
which was not observed in original lignin (MWL-SG) (Figure 3).A corresponding methylene
6
group (-OCH2CH3) was also observed at δc 63.9 ppm. It is possible that an ethoxyl group was
7
introduced on lignin through etherification of benzyl alcohol group (Scheme 1). A similar peak
8
has been reported on isolated lignin from Miscanthus by ethanol organosolv process under reflux
9
condition previously by HSQC-TOCSY NMR.38 Unexpectedly, higher pretreatment temperature
10
results in lower ethoxyl group in EOL-SG. The amount of ethoxyl related methyl carbon (per Ar)
11
decreased gradually in EOL-SG (Figure 3 and Table S1 in Supporting Information). The 14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 15 of 34
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
1
ethoxyl group gave a HSQC correlation with a methylene group at δC/δH 63.9/3.36 ppm, the peak
2
signal also gradually decreased with the increase of pretreatment temperature. We believe that
3
the newly formed ether bonds were cleaved under the higher temperature, which decreased the
4
content of ethoxyl groups in EOL-SG. This suggested this etherification reaction was reversible
5
and higher temperature results in lower etherification. The decrease of ethoxyl group was
6
coincident with the decrease of stimulatory effect of EOL-SG on enzymatic hydrolysis. It is
7
possible that ethanol alkylation suppresses lignin condensation. C5 and Cα condensation has been
8
observed in lignin model compounds.39 In this case, the Cα was etherified with ethanol and
9
would not be available for further condensation reactions. Similar observation has been reported
10
in organosolv pulping, in which it was suggested that lignin condensation under acidic condition
11
was significantly hindered by the addition of alcohols.30
12
Meanwhile, it was also observed the content of etherified S3,5 at 152 ppm decreased
13
gradually and non-etherified S3,5 and G3 at 147 ppm increased correspondingly at higher
14
temperature (Table S1 in Supporting Information). The increase of the signal of non-etherified
15
S3,5 and G3 in 13C NMR spectra indicated the formation of new phenolic hydroxyl group in EOL-
16
SG170, 180 and 190. This was consistent with the 1H NMR analysis result (Table 1), which
17
showed the increasing pretreatment temperature increased the content of phenolic hydroxyl
18
group by 44, 77, and 84% in EOL-SG170, 180 and 190 respectively, as comparing to EOL-
19
SG160.
20 21
15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 16 of 34
1
Table 1. Determination of functional groups in EOL-SG and EOL-LP by 1H NMR analysis
2
using p-nitrobenzaldehyde as internal standard [mM g-1] Lignin
Phenolic hydroxyl
Aliphatic hydroxyl
Methoxyl
EOL-SG160
2.75
5.27
11.75
EOL-SG170
3.96
3.98
11.83
EOL-SG180
4.88
2.77
11.10
EOL-SG190
5.07
2.68
10.43
EOL-LP170
2.91
5.74
8.99
EOL-LP180
3.59
5.48
8.74
EOL-LP190
3.53
4.87
7.14
EOL-LP200
3.60
4.37
6.14
3 HO HO
MeO
HO HC
O OMe OMe O
HO H3C
O
+
H
-H2O MeO
MeO
OMe MeO
O
O
H+, CH3CH2OH
OMe O
MeO
OMe MeO
OMe O
4 5 6 7
Scheme 1. Alkylation of lignin with ethanol resulting in the etherification of Cα (reversible reaction). For EOL-LP, the similar etherification of lignin substructure was observed based on 13C
8
NMR (Figure S1 in Supporting Information). As the pretreatment temperature increased, the
9
amount of ethoxyl related methyl group in EOL-LP decreased gradually (Table S2 in Supporting
10
Information). The cleavage of the newly formed ether bonds were not significant for softwood
11
lignin at higher temperature, and the etherified ethoxyl groups in loblolly pine appeared to be
12
more stable than those in sweetgum. Unexpectedly, higher temperature resulted an increased
13
signal at 14.7 ppm in EOL-LP. Meanwhile, the signals of carboxylic acid/ester groups at 178– 16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 17 of 34
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
1
168 ppm in EOL-LP increased gradually with the increase of temperature (Table S2 in
2
Supporting Information). The aliphatic esters probably were formed between ethanol and
3
aliphatic acid groups. Similar results have been reported in catalytic depolymerization of lignin
4
with supercritical ethanol, in which the formation of alkyl ester was observed in HSQC NMR
5
and esterification took place between ethanol and lignin side chains.31 The aliphatic acid groups
6
were most likely generated from the oxidation of the propyl side chain. The substructure
7
etherified aliphatic ester was also confirmed by HMBC NMR in our study (Figure S2 in
8
Supporting Information). The C-H of methyl group correlation was observed at δC/δH 14.4/1.2
9
ppm in HMBC NMR. The C of methyl group can see the H of methylene at δH 4.05 ppm. The
10
corresponding C in methylene at δC 60.2 ppm, gives further HMBC correlation to C=O at 173
11
ppm. The ester gave a HSQC correlation with a methylene group at δC/δH 60.2/4.05 ppm (Figure
12
4). Similar correlation has been observed in the residual lignin of a catalytic reaction,31 in which
13
they suggested the esterification can also suppress the lignin condensation. In this study, this
14
cross signal increased gradually with the increase of temperature. This probably can explain why
15
the EOL-LP from higher temperature became stimulatory, because more esterification took place
16
and inhibited the lignin condensation. The chemical shifts of both ethyl carbons in lignin ester
17
agreed well with those of model carboxylic esters.40 Similar aliphatic ethyl esters reaction
18
products have been identified in the reaction of lignin and ethanol under toluene sulfonic acid
19
catalyzation.41 Meanwhile, the content of etherified G3,4 at 149 ppm decreased slightly and non-
20
etherified G3,4 at 147 ppm increased correspondingly at higher temperature (Table S2 in
21
Supporting Information). This indicated that higher temperature increased the content of
22
phenolic hydroxyl group in EOL-LP slightly, which was confirmed by 1H NMR analysis.
17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
1
Compared to the EOL-SG, the phenolic hydroxyl groups in EOL-LP did not increase much as
2
the temperature increased (Table 1).
Page 18 of 34
3
The aromatic region (160–103 ppm) and higher aliphatic region (89–58 ppm) in 13C NMR
4
spectra were analyzed as well. The increase of temperature increased the content of condensed
5
aromatics in both EOL-SG and EOL-LP, which contributed to the decrease of the content of
6
protonated aromatics. It was observed that the condensed aromatics in both EOL-SG and EOL-
7
LP increased with the increase of temperature (Table S1 and Table S2 in Supporting
8
Information). This indicated that the condensation reaction in EOLs took place in higher
9
temperature of organosolv process. A similar observation has been reported for isolated lignins
10
from hydrothermal pretreatment of aspen, in which the condensed aromatics also increased after
11
pretreated at 170 °C.42 It should be noted that this condensation reaction was significantly
12
suppressed by lignin alkylation and esterification in organosolv processes.
13
The propyl side chain related aliphatic region in 13C NMR can be separated into three areas
14
(89–78, 73–71, and 61–58 ppm), which was mainly identified as Cβ, Cα and Cγ areas,
15
respectively in β-O-4 linkage substructures. Organosolv process breaks the interunit linkages of
16
α-aryl-ether and β-aryl-ether bonds in both EOL-SG and EOL-LP. An increase of temperature in
17
the organosolv process resulted in a significant decrease of Cβ, Cα, and Cγ areas. This agrees with
18
previous reports that cleavage of β-O-4 linkage is the main mechanism for the organosolv
19
process.24 It was also confirmed by the increase of the signals (130–145 ppm) of non-etherified
20
G3 and S3,5 groups as the pretreatment temperature increased.
21
The HSQC spectra of EOL-SG and EOL-LP from different pretreatment temperature was
22
compared in Figure 4. The inter-unit linkages of β-aryl-ether (β-O-4, A), resinol (β-β, B), 18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 19 of 34
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
1
phenylcoumaran (β-5, C) were identified by their cross-peaks (Figure 4 and Table S3). HSQC
2
NMR spectra showed that an α-ethoxylated β-O-4ʹ substructure (Aʹ) was formed in both EOL-
3
SG and EOL-LP. The methylene group of Aʹα-OCH2CH3 was observed at δC/δH 63.9/3.36 ppm.
4
The correlation of Cα-Hα in Aʹ was observed at δC/δH 80.1/4.57 ppm. As the temperature
5
increased, the cross signals of Aα andAʹα decreased significantly and became not visible in EOL-
6
SG180 and EOL-SG190 (Figure 4a). This suggested that most of β-O-4 linkage was cleaved,
7
including the newly formed β-O-4ʹ in Aʹ. The cross signals of Bγ did not change at higher
8
temperature. This indicated resinol was stable in organosolv processes. The HSQC spectra
9
showed the cross signals of Aʹα-OEt decreased gradually as the temperature increased, which 13
10
agreed well with the observations in the
C NMR spectra. For EOL-LP, one cross signal
11
increased dramatically in HSQC at δC/δH 60.2/4.05 ppm (Figure 4b). This agrees well with the
12
observed correlation of methylene group in ethyl esters in lignin depolymeration.41
13
19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 20 of 34
1 2
(a) HSQC NMR spectra of EOL-SG lignins (side chain region)
20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 21 of 34
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3
(b) HSQC NMR spectra of EOL-LP lignins (side chain region) Figure 4. HSQC NMR spectra of EOL-SG and EOL-LP lignins.
4
3.3. Effects of Pretreatment Temperature on Hydrophobicity, Surface Charge and
5
Molecular Size of EOLs. To examine the changes on physicochemical properties of EOLs in
6
the organosolv process, surface charge, molecular weight and hydrophobicity of EOL-SG and
7
EOL-LP lignins were determined (Table 2). As pretreatment temperature increased, the surface
8
charges of EOL-LP lignins increased by 11-55%, as compared to EOL-LP170, which could be
9
attributed to the increase on carboxylic acid groups as shown in 13C NMR analysis (Table S2 in
10
Supporting Information). The increasing negative charge in lignins could come from the more
11
side chain oxidized under the higher temperature. The more negatively charged groups in EOL-
12
LP could result in the stronger electrostatic repulsion between enzyme and lignins, thus reduced
13
non-productive binding and enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis. Compared to EOL-LP, the surface 21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 22 of 34
1
charges of EOL-SG first decreased and then increased. GPC analysis indicated that the Mn, Mw,
2
and Mw/Mn (degree of polydispersity) decreased in both EOL-SG and EOL-LP, as the
3
pretreatment temperature increased. The decrease on molecular weight was mainly due to the
4
cleavage of ether linkages of the lignin, which was observed in 13C NMR spectra (Table S1 and
5
Table S2 in Supporting Information). A similar result was reported that increasing temperature
6
resulted in extensive cleavage of ether linkages of EOL from poplar.26, 43As for the
7
hydrophobicity of lignins, the increasing temperature seemed decrease the hydrophobicity in
8
both EOL-SG and EOL-LP. EOL-SG160 showed the highest hydrophobicity, and EOL-LP170
9
showed the highest hydrophobicity. The increase of negative charge could decrease the enzyme
10
nonproductive binding due to the electrostatic repulsion. The decrease of hydrophobicity in EOL
11
could decrease the hydrophobic interaction between enzyme and lignin. However, the net effect
12
of lignin inhibition or stimulation depends on the combined influence of hydrophobicity and
13
surface charge.28
14
Table 2. Hydrophobicity, surface charges, and molecular weight of organosolv lignins. Lignin
Surface charge at pH 4.8
Mw
Hydrophobicity
[mM g-1]
[g M-1]
[L g-1]
EOL-SG160
-0.542
5457
0.56
EOL-SG170
-0.458
3039
0.23
EOL-SG180
-0.583
2013
0.45
EOL-SG190
-0.583
1881
0.33
EOL-LP170
-0.375
5210
1.07
EOL-LP180
-0.417
3532
0.47
22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 23 of 34
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
EOL-LP190
-0.583
2920
0.49
EOL-LP200
-0.583
2855
0.27
1 2
3.4. Effects of Pretreatment Temperatures on EOLs Affinity to Enzyme. To assess the
3
cellulases affinity to EOLs, Langmuir adsorption isotherms were determined (Table 3). The
4
results showed that EOL-SG had lower affinity to cellulases than EOL-LP. The Langmuir
5
constant (K) from EOL-LP was two or three fold of that from EOL-SG. The distribution
6
coefficient (R) from EOL-LP was 10–15 folds higher than that from EOL-SG. Specifically for
7
EOL-SG, the higher pretreatment temperature resulted in the higher binding affinity between
8
lignin and enzyme based on the Langmuir constant (K) and distribution coefficient (R).
9
Table 3. Langmuir adsorption isotherm parameters from enzyme adsorption on lignins. Lignins
Гmax [mg g-1]
K [mL mg-1]
R [L g-1]
EOL-SG160
1.05
7.21
0.008
EOL-SG170
2.66
8.82
0.023
EOL-SG180
4.51
9.90
0.045
EOL-SG190
5.59
10.18
0.057
EOL-LP170
6.40
20.73
0.139
EOL-LP180
5.81
20.96
0.122
EOL-LP190
5.49
21.17
0.116
EOL-LP200
5.17
18.90
0.098
10
23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
1
Page 24 of 34
On the contrary for EOL-LP, the higher pretreatment temperature resulted in the lower
2
binding affinity based on R value. A good correlation (r2>0.70) was found between R values and
3
the amount of surface charge of EOL-LP. This indicated the increase in surface charge could
4
increase the electrostatic repulsion between enzyme and lignin, thus reduced the binding affinity
5
of high-temperature EOL-LP to enzyme.
6
The R value has been considered as the binding strength between enzyme and lignin, which
7
was related to enzyme adsorption and desorption. A lower R value of EOL-SG resulted in the
8
higher positive effect on enzymatic hydrolysis. A strong negative correlation (r2>0.97) was
9
observed between R value of EOL-SG lignins and their corresponding 72 h hydrolysis yields of
10
OPSG and OPLP (Figure 5). This indicated that weaker binding from EOL-SG lignin could
11
stimulate enzymatic hydrolysis.
12
For EOL-LP, a similar correlation (r2>0.85) was found between R value and their
13
corresponding 72 h hydrolysis yields of OPSG and OPLP (Figure 5). Higher temperature in
14
pretreatment typically resulted in higher R value for lignin.42 However in this study, the higher
15
temperature results in lower R value for EOL-LP. It was most likely because the esterification
16
took place at higher temperature and effectively suppressed the lignin condensation and reduced
17
the hydrophobicity of EOL-LP lignins.
24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 25 of 34
70
72 h Glucose yield (%)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
60
50
Avicel OPSG OPLP Left: EOL-SG Right: EOL-LP
40
30
0.00
1
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.16
Distribution coefficient (R)
2
Figure 5. Correlation between distribution coefficient (R) and 72 h hydrolysis yield of Avicel,
3
OPSG and OPLP.
4
3.5. The Potential Effects of Lignin Alkylation in Organosolv Pretreatment Process.
5
Quantitative 13C NMR suggested that an alkylation of sweetgum lignin with ethanol in the
6
organosolv process resulted in the etherification of the propyl side chain. As mentioned earlier,
7
this remarkable change was observed in the lower aliphatic region (~15 ppm) for EOLs. A signal
8
of 15.4/15.7 ppm was assigned to a methyl carbon in an ethoxyl group, which has been
9
suggested to be due to a nucleophilic addition reaction between ethanol and benzylic position in
10
β-aryl ether substructure of lignin.38, 44 As the pretreatment temperature increased, the amount of
11
this ethoxyl group in EOL-SG gradually decreased (Table S1 in Supporting Information). More
12
importantly, a strong negative correlation (r2=0.90) was observed between the affinity of enzyme
13
on EOL-SG (R value) and the content of ethoxyl group in EOL-SG. This indicated that the
14
decrease of ethoxyl group content in EOL-SG probably increased the affinity of enzyme to
15
lignins, and thus reduced their stimulatory effects. Moreover, the higher temperature in
16
organosolv resulted in the less etherification of lignin. This has a potential application in the 25 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 26 of 34
1
biorefinery if higher temperatures or severity are not necessary for hardwood biomass.
2
Quantitative 13C NMR and HMBC NMR indicated that an alkylation of loblolly pine lignin with
3
ethanol at higher temperature (>190 °C) resulted in the esterification of aliphatic acid side chain,
4
which changed the inhibitory effects of EOL-LP lignins to become positive.
5
4. CONCLUSIONS
6
The structural changes of EOLs in organosolv processes and their positive/negative effects on
7
enzymatic hydrolysis were investigated. Quantitative 13C NMR was used to characterize the
8
effects of pretreatment temperature on structural changes of EOLs. It was observed ethanol
9
etherification of propyl side chain occurred in hardwood lignin (EOL-SG) and this etherification
10
is a reversible reaction. Remarkably, as organosolv pretreatment temperature increased, the
11
positive effects of EOL-SG from sweetgum decreased. On the contrary, the negative effects of
12
EOL-LP from loblolly pine changed to become positive at higher temperature. It was proposed
13
that this change was associated with the ethanol esterification of aliphatic acid side chain of
14
lignin substructure at higher temperature in softwood lignin. We believe that lignin etherification
15
and esterification suppress lignin condensation reactions and resulted in lignins low affinity to
16
enzyme, which in turn enhanced the enzymatic hydrolysis by reducing the non-productive
17
binding between residual lignin and cellulases.
18
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
19
Supporting Information
20
Table S1. Summary of chemical groups in EOL-SG lignins by quantitative 13C NMR analysis.
21
Table S2. Summary of chemical groups in EOL-LP lignins by quantitative 13C NMR analysis.
22
Table S3. Assignments of 13C-1H cross-signals in 2D-HSQC spectra of lignins. Figure S1. 26 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 27 of 34
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
1
Quantitative 13C NMR spectra of EOL-LP170, EOL-LP180, EOL-LP190 and EOL- LP200.
2
Figure S2. HMBC NMR spectra of EOL-LP200 lignin. Figure S3. HSQC NMR spectra of
3
EOL-SG lignins. Figure S4. HSQC NMR spectra of EOL-LP lignins.
4
AUTHOR INFORMATION
5
Corresponding Author
6
* E-mail:
[email protected] 7
Notes
8
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
9
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
10
The study was supported in part by grants from Alabama Agricultural Experimental Station, Sun
11
Grant and USDA NIFA (Grant NO. 2011-68005-30410). Lai’s study was also partially supported
12
by Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province for youth (BK20150874) and National
13
Natural Science Foundation for youth (31600463).
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 27 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
1
Page 28 of 34
REFERENCES
2 3
(1) Bhutto, A. W.; Qureshi, K.; Harijan, K.; Zahedi, G.; Bahadori, A. Strategies for the
4
consolidation of biologically mediated events in the conversion of pre-treated
5
lignocellulose into ethanol. RSC Adv.2014, 4, 3392-3412.
6
(2) Himmel, M. E.; Ding, S.-Y.; Johnson, D. K.; Adney, W. S.; Nimlos, M. R.; Brady, J. W.;
7
Foust, T. D. Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels
8
production. Science 2007, 315, 804-807.
9
(3) Chundawat, S. P.; Beckham, G. T.; Himmel, M. E.; Dale, B. E. Deconstruction of
10
lignocellulosic biomass to fuels and chemicals. Annu.Rev.Chem.Biomol.Eng.2011, 2,
11
121-145.
12 13 14 15
(4) Luterbacher, J.; Alonso, D. M.; Dumesic, J. Targeted chemical upgrading of lignocellulosic biomass to platform molecules. Green Chem.2014, 16, 4816-4838. (5) Mansfield, S. D.; Mooney, C.; Saddler, J. N. Substrate and enzyme characteristics that limit cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Progr.1999, 15, 804-816.
16
(6) Mooney, C. A.; Mansfield, S. D.; Touhy, M. G.; Saddler, J. N. The effect of initial pore
17
volume and lignin content on the enzymatic hydrolysis of softwoods. Bioresour.
18
Technol.1998, 64, 113-119.
19
(7) Kumar, L.; Arantes, V.; Chandra, R.; Saddler, J. The lignin present in steam pretreated
20
softwood binds enzymes and limits cellulose accessibility. Bioresour. Technol.2012, 103,
21
201-208.
28 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 29 of 34
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
1
(8) Rahikainen, J. L.; Evans, J. D.; Mikander, S.; Kalliola, A.; Puranen, T.; Tamminen, T.;
2
Marjamaa, K.; Kruus, K. Cellulase-lignin interactions—The role of carbohydrate-binding
3
module and pH in non-productive binding. Enzyme Microb. Technol.2013, 53, 315-321.
4
(9) Zeng, Y.; Zhao, S.; Yang, S.; Ding, S.-Y. Lignin plays a negative role in the biochemical
5
process for producing lignocellulosic biofuels. Curr.Opin.Biotechnol.2014, 27, 38-45.
6
(10)
Pereira, A.; Hoeger, I. C.; Ferrer, A.; Rencoret, J.; del Rio, J. C.; Kruus, K.;
7
Rahikainen, J.; Kellock, M.; Gutierrez, A.; Rojas, O. J. Lignin films from spruce,
8
eucalyptus, and wheat straw studied with electroacoustic and optical sensors: Effect of
9
composition and electrostatic screening on enzyme binding. Biomacromolecules 2017,
10 11
18, 1322-1332. (11)
Pielhop, T.; Larrazábal, G. O.; Studer, M. H.; Brethauer, S.; Seidel, C.-M.; von
12
Rohr, P. R. Lignin repolymerisation in spruce autohydrolysis pretreatment increases
13
cellulase deactivation. Green Chem.2015, 17, 3521-3532.
14
(12)
Yu, Z.; Gwak, K. S.; Treasure, T.; Jameel, H.; Chang, H. m.; Park, S. Effect of
15
lignin chemistry on the enzymatic hydrolysis of woody biomass. ChemSusChem 2014, 7,
16
1942-1950.
17
(13)
Lai, C.; Tu, M.; Shi, Z.; Zheng, K.; Olmos, L. G.; Yu, S. Contrasting effects of
18
hardwood and softwood organosolv lignins on enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose.
19
Bioresour. Technol.2014, 163, 320-327.
20
(14)
Campbell, M. M.; Sederoff, R. R. Variation in Lignin Content and Composition
21
(Mechanisms of Control and Implications for the Genetic Improvement of Plants). Plant
22
Physiol.1996, 110, 3.
29 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
1
(15)
Page 30 of 34
Li, J.; Henriksson, G.; Gellerstedt, G. Lignin depolymerization/repolymerization
2
and its critical role for delignification of aspen wood by steam explosion. Bioresour.
3
Technol. 2007, 98, 3061-3068.
4
(16)
Nakagame, S.; Chandra, R. P.; Kadla, J. F.; Saddler, J. N. The isolation,
5
characterization and effect of lignin isolated from steam pretreated Douglas-fir on the
6
enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Bioresour. Technol.2011, 102, 4507-4517.
7 8 9
(17)
Pan, X. Role of functional groups in lignin inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis of
cellulose to glucose. J. Biobased Mater.Bioenergy 2008, 2, 25-32. (18)
Sewalt, V.; Glasser, W.; Beauchemin, K. Lignin impact on fiber degradation. 3.
10
Reversal of inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis by chemical modification of lignin and by
11
additives. J. Agric. Food Chem.1997, 45, 1823-1828.
12
(19)
Nakagame, S.; Chandra, R. P.; Kadla, J. F.; Saddler, J. N. Enhancing the
13
enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass by increasing the carboxylic acid content
14
of the associated lignin. Biotechnol.Bioeng.2011, 108, 538-548.
15
(20)
Rahikainen, J. L.; Martin-Sampedro, R.; Heikkinen, H.; Rovio, S.; Marjamaa, K.;
16
Tamminen, T.; Rojas, O. J.; Kruus, K. Inhibitory effect of lignin during cellulose
17
bioconversion: the effect of lignin chemistry on non-productive enzyme adsorption.
18
Bioresour. Technol.2013, 133, 270-278.
19
(21)
Selig, M. J.; Viamajala, S.; Decker, S. R.; Tucker, M. P.; Himmel, M. E.; Vinzant,
20
T. B. Deposition of lignin droplets produced during dilute acid pretreatment of maize
21
stems retards enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Biotechnol.Progr.2007, 23, 1333-1339.
30 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 31 of 34
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
1
Energy & Fuels
(22)
Kim, D. E.; Pan, X. J. Preliminary study on converting hybrid poplar to high-
2
value chemicals and lignin using organosolv ethanol process. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.2010,
3
49, 12156-12163.
4
(23)
Pan, X. J.; Arato, C.; Gilkes, N.; Gregg, D.; Mabee, W.; Pye, K.; Xiao, Z. Z.;
5
Zhang, X.; Saddler, J. Biorefining of softwoods using ethanol organosolv pulping:
6
Preliminary evaluation of process streams for manufacture of fuel-grade ethanol and co-
7
products. Biotechnol.Bioeng.2005, 90, (4), 473-481.
8 9 10 11 12
(24)
McDonough, T. J. The chemistry of organosolv delignification. Tappi J.1992, 76,
186-193. (25)
Zhao, X.; Cheng, K.; Liu, D. Organosolv pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass
for enzymatic hydrolysis. Appl.Microbiol.Biotechnol.2009, 82, 815. (26)
Pan, X.; Gilkes, N.; Kadla, J.; Pye, K.; Saka, S.; Gregg, D.; Ehara, K.; Xie, D.;
13
Lam, D.; Saddler, J. Bioconversion of hybrid poplar to ethanol and co‐products using an
14
organosolv
15
Biotechnol.Bioeng.2006, 94, 851-861.
16
(27)
fractionation
process:
Optimization
of
process
yields.
Lai, C. H.; Tu, M. B.; Li, M.; Yu, S. Y. Remarkable solvent and extractable lignin
17
effects on enzymatic digestibility of organosolv pretreated hardwood. Bioresour. Technol.
18
2014, 156, 92-99.
19
(28)
Huang, Y.; Sun, S. L.; Huang, C.; Yong, Q.; Elder, T.; Tu, M. B. Stimulation and
20
inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis by organosolv lignins as determined by zeta potential
21
and hydrophobicity. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2017, 10.
31 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
1
(29)
Page 32 of 34
Adler, E.; Brunow, G.; Lundquist, K. Investigation of the acid-catalyzed
2
alkylation of lignins by means of NMRspectroscopic methods. Holzforschung 1987, 41,
3
199-207.
4 5 6
(30)
Lai, Y. Z.; Mun, S. P. The chemical Aspects of acidic delignification processes .1.
Role of aryl-ether hydrolysis in aspen. Holzforschung 1994, 48, 203-206. (31)
Huang, X. M.; Koranyi, T. I.; Boot, M. D.; Hensen, E. J. M. Ethanol as capping
7
agent and formaldehyde scavenger for efficient depolymerization of lignin to aromatics.
8
Green Chem.2015, 17, 4941-4950.
9 10 11 12 13
(32)
Adney, B.; Baker, J. Measurement of cellulase activities. Laboratory analytical
procedure 1996, 6, 1996. (33)
Wood, T. M.; Bhat, K. M., Methods for measuring cellulase activities. Methods in
enzymology 1988, 160, 87-112. (34)
Gessner, A.; Waicz, R.; Lieske, A.; Paulke, B.-R.; Mäder, K.; Müller, R.
14
Nanoparticles with decreasing surface hydrophobicities: influence on plasma protein
15
adsorption. Int.J. Pharm.2000, 196, 245-249.
16 17 18
(35)
Pan, X.; Saddler, J. N. Effect of replacing polyol by organosolv and kraft lignin
on the property and structure of rigid polyurethane foam. Biotechnol.Biofuels2013, 6, 12. (36)
Leskinen, T.; Salas, C.; Kelley, S. S.; Argyropoulos, D. S. Wood Extractives
19
Promote Cellulase Activity on Cellulosic Substrates. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16, 3226-
20
3234.
21 22
(37)
Wang, Z. J.; Zhu, J. Y.; Fu, Y. J.; Qin, M. H.; Shao, Z. Y.; Jiang, J. G.; Yang, F.,
Lignosulfonate-mediated cellulase adsorption: enhanced enzymatic saccharification of
32 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 33 of 34
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Energy & Fuels
1
lignocellulose through weakening nonproductive binding to lignin. Biotechnol. Biofuels
2
2013, 6.
3
(38)
Bauer, S.; Sorek, H.; Mitchell, V. D.; Ibáñez, A. B.; Wemmer, D. E.
4
Characterization of Miscanthus giganteus lignin isolated by ethanol organosolv process
5
under reflux condition. J. Agric.Food Chem.2012, 60, 8203-8212.
6
(39)
Barkhau, R. A.; Malcolm, E. W.; Dimmel, D. R. Insoluble lignin models (4) -
7
condensation-reactions of a polymer-bound guaiacylpropanol model. J. Wood Chem.
8
Technol. 1990, 10, 269-291.
9 10 11
(40)
Couperus, P. A.; Clague, A. D. H.; Vandongen, J. P. C. M. C-13 Chemical-shifts
of some model carboxylic-acids and esters. Org. Magn. Resonance 1978, 11,590-597. (41)
Mbotchak, L.; Le Morvan, C.; Duong, K. L.; Rousseau, B.; Tessier, M.; Fradet,
12
A. Purification, structural characterization, and modification of organosolv wheat straw
13
lignin. J. Agric.Food Chem.2015, 63, 5178-5188.
14
(42)
Sun, S. L.; Huang, Y.; Sun, R. C.; Tu, M. B. The strong association of condensed
15
phenolic moieties in isolated lignins with their inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis. Green
16
Chem.2016, 18, 4276-4286.
17
(43)
El Hage, R.; Brosse, N.; Sannigrahi, P.; Ragauskas, A. Effects of process severity
18
on
19
Polym.Degrad.Stab.2010, 95, 997-1003.
20
the
(44)
chemical
structure
of
Miscanthus
ethanol
organosolv
lignin.
Balakshin, M. Y.; Capanema, E. A. Comprehensive structural analysis of
21
biorefinery lignins with a quantitative
22
87199.
13
C NMR approach. RSC Adv.2015, 5, 87187-
23 33 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Energy & Fuels
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
1
Page 34 of 34
TOC Figure
2
3 4
34 ACS Paragon Plus Environment