Methanogenic Archaea in Marcellus Shale: A Possible Mechanism for

Apr 29, 2015 - ... is the natural gas in the Marcellus Shale of the Appalachian Basin. ...... Buhler , J. D. ; Lancaster , J. M. ; Jacob , A. C. ; Cha...
1 downloads 0 Views 796KB Size
Subscriber access provided by GAZI UNIV

Article

Methanogenic Archaea in Marcellus Shale: A Possible Mechanism for Enhanced Gas Recovery in Unconventional Shale Resources Yael Tarlovsky Tucker, James Kotcon, and Thomas Mroz Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00765 • Publication Date (Web): 29 Apr 2015 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 5, 2015

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 20

Environmental Science & Technology

Methanogenic Archaea in Marcellus Shale: A Possible Mechanism for Enhanced Gas Recovery in Unconventional Shale Resources Yael T. Tucker*, 1, 2, James Kotcon2, and Thomas Mroz1 1

National Energy Technology Laboratory, United States Department of Energy, Morgantown, WV, USA

2

Division of Plant and Soil Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA

*National Energy Technology Laboratory, United States Department of Energy, 3610 Collins Ferry Rd., PO Box 880, Morgantown, WV, 26505 USA; ph. (304) 285-1398; [email protected]

1

ABSTRACT

2

Marcellus Shale occurs at depths of 1.5 to 2.5 km (5,000 to 8,000 ft.) where most geologists generally assume that

3

thermogenic processes are the only source of natural gas. However, methanogens in produced fluids and isotopic

4

signatures of biogenic methane in this deep shale have recently been discovered. This study explores whether those

5

methanogens are indigenous to the shale or are introduced during drilling and hydraulic fracturing. DNA was

6

extracted from Marcellus Shale core samples, pre-injected fluids and produced fluids and was analyzed using Miseq

7

sequencing of 16s rRNA genes. Methanogens present in shale cores were similar to methanogens in produced fluids.

8

No methanogens were detected in injected fluids suggesting that this is an unlikely source and that they may be

9

native to the shale itself. Bench-top methane production tests of shale core and produced fluids suggest that these

10

organisms are alive and active under simulated reservoir conditions. Growth conditions designed to simulate the

11

hydrofracture processes indicated somewhat increased methane production; however, fluids alone produced

12

relatively little methane. Together, these results suggest that some biogenic methane may be produced in these wells

13

and that hydrofracture fluids currently used to stimulate gas recovery could stimulate methanogens and their rate of

14

producing methane.

15

INTRODUCTION

16

With continued development of second- and third-world economies and continued population growth,

17

worldwide energy demands have become more difficult to fulfill. Currently, the United States uses more than 96

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Tucker et al.

Methanogenic Archaea In Marcellus Shale

Page 2 of 20

2

18

Quadrillion British Thermal Units (BTUs) of energy per year, only 8 % of which comes from renewable sources.1

19

The majority of that energy is provided by coal, petroleum, and natural gas. One of the newest and most

20

controversial frontiers in energy production is the natural gas in the Marcellus Shale of the Appalachian Basin. That

21

gas is believed to have the capacity of ensuring at least 100 years of additional reliable energy and can be acquired

22

domestically, so it is of special interest. Although other sources of natural gas were used in the past, it is within

23

recent years that technology has been used advantageously to extract natural gas trapped in the deep, low-

24

permeability shale rock. However, due to its continuing development, both challenges and benefits are still arising. 2

25

Although it has been generally accepted that methane gas from Marcellus Shale is completely thermogenic,

26

recent studies using isotope measurements have found evidence of potentially biogenic gases present in these shale

27

wells.3 Such a finding may be of great importance because biogenic methane is generated by micro-organisms at a

28

much more rapid rate than methane generated by inorganic, thermogenic processes, which require geologic time

29

periods at current reservoir temperatures.4 Therefore, biogenic sources would mean faster regeneration of natural gas

30

in these shales and potential for secondary gas recovery. Such recovery efforts can be seen in coal today because

31

coal has been shown to contain methanogens that are able to produce significant amounts of biogenic methane.5, 6

32

Similarly, much work has also been done to engineer methanogens for gas recovery from waste coal materials.7-9

33

Economic production of biogenic methane has also been found in shales. For example, in Michigan, where the

34

Devonian-age Antrim Shale was discovered to contain large numbers of Methanohalophilus, the shale naturally

35

produces enough biogenic methane for economic recovery.10 Although this shale is younger and shallower (0.05).

187

All of the produced water Barnett Shale samples indicated homology to uncultured Methanosarcina. This suggests

188

that methanogens are present in the Barnett well and may not originate from the injected hydrofracture water.

189

Alternatively, it is possible that methanogenic Archaea are at concentrations that are too low for detection in these

190

Barnett Shale pre-injection fluids.

191

Five Marcellus Shale wells were sampled for produced fluids; however, pre-injection samples were only

192

available for one well (MB). Produced water samples were taken from the separator or the storage tank or both

193

(Table 1). The pre-injection water from well MB contained no sequences that could be identified with methanogens

194

and a few sequences that identified with uncultured Archaea (and therefore may belong to non-methanogenic

195

species). However, produced water from the storage tank on the same well (MB), on day 60 of production, did

196

contain a 0.02% propostion of methanogenic organisms. The presence of organisms found in the flowback fluids is

197

significant (p ≤ 0.05), using a Poisson test of significance when compared to the pre-injection fluids. These

198

organisms included those with homologies to the genus Methanococcoides and other uncultured species from the

199

order Methanosarcinales. Organisms in Methanococcoides are characterized as methanogens that consume

200

methylated compounds.35 The water from the holding tanks of the other wells from the same region, (M1, M2, M3)

201

all contained DNA with homologies to methanogenic Archaea. Wells M1 and M2 were also sampled later in

202

production but only well M2 contained sequences with homology to methanogenic Archaea in the later samples.

203

Samples of separator water from both M1 and M2 were also analyzed to consider possible contamination from the

204

holding tank or negative selection due to the oxygenated conditions during storage. The initial sample taken from

205

the M1 well separator on day 661 of production contained a much enriched methanogenic culture (17%); however,

206

other samples taken from this separator at later times did not contain sequences from methanogenic Archaea. It is

207

unclear why this sample was so much more enriched than the others at just one point in time. Notably, this sample

208

also contained a biofilm producer (Halanaerobium prevalens) in a high percentage, so it is possible that a biofilm

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 20

Environmental Science & Technology

Tucker et al.

Methanogenic Archaea In Marcellus Shale

9

209

dislodged from the well and was carried into the separator. This may indicate why a small percentage of

210

methanogens are usually seen in produced fluids, as methanogens may normally be immobile in their biofilms.36

211

DNA isolated from two different depths (7860 and 7872 feet) of Marcellus Shale core samples from

212

Greene County, PA (Core 1, 2 respectively) indicated the presence of methanogens in the population (0.01-0.47%).

213

These values were not statistically different from those in the produced fluids. Nearly all of these methanogenic

214

sequences identified with >97% homology to uncultured Methanosarcina, much like the produced water samples

215

above. Evidence of methanogens in produced fluids was paired with evidence from core samples to examine any

216

overlap in methanogenic species. Despite the non-sterile nature of these samples, the cores have never come in

217

contact with hydrofracturing fluids; therefore, contamination from injection water would not explain an overlap in

218

organisms between core and produced water. Presence of methanogens in both sets of samples suggests that the

219

methanogens seen in produced fluids may have come from the shale, and that there may be a native community of

220

these organisms in the shale before drilling began. The fact that these organisms are not similar enough to currently

221

isolated organisms in these conserved regions also supports this hypothesis, since these organisms would have had

222

much time while in isolation to differentiate from methanogens at the Earth’s surface.

223

A matched pairs test indicated that the number of sequences from methanogenic Archaea was highly

224

correlated with the number of sequences from certain non-methanogenic organisms, with r values of 0.99, 0.95,

225

0.96, and 0.95 for Halanaerobium, Anaerophaga, Clostridium and Fastidosipila, respectively (NCBI sample

226

numbers SAMN03273679-SAMN03273731). These genera all include extremophiles that could have sourced

227

alongside these methanogens. Diversity analysis illustrated both differences and similarities between the organisms

228

present in samples of pre-injection water, storage tank water, separator water, and cores. Although the absence of

229

organism detection in any sample may have been because their abundance was below detectable levels, overlaps

230

between all types of organisms found in storage tank water, separator water, and cores but absent in pre-injection

231

water provides information on which organisms may be in (or perhaps native to) the shale.

232

Metagenomic Assay. To eliminate possible primer bias, an enriched separator sample (from well M1) indicating

233

17% methanogenic composition, as identified by the DNA sequencing, was analyzed using metagenomic

234

techniques. Although the percentages are different, metagenomic analysis identified sequences that are homologous

235

to proteins or 16S rRNA regions of several methanogenic Archaea (Figure 1). Despite its relatively low (97% homology)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment