Microbial Mats as a Biological Treatment Approach for Saline

Apr 13, 2015 - Citation data is made available by participants in Crossref's Cited-by Linking service. For a more comprehensive list of citations to t...
0 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size
Subscriber access provided by ECU Libraries

Article

Microbial Mats as a Biological Treatment Approach for Saline Wastewaters: The Case of Produced Water from Hydraulic Fracturing Benay Akyon, Elyse Stachler, Na Wei, and Kyle Bibby Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/es505142t • Publication Date (Web): 13 Apr 2015 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on April 20, 2015

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 29

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Microbial Mats as a Biological Treatment Approach for

2

Saline Wastewaters: The Case of Produced Water from

3

Hydraulic Fracturing

4

Benay Akyon1, Elyse Stachler1, Na Wei1, Kyle Bibby1,2*

5

1

6

Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and 2Department of Computational and

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14 15

*

16

[email protected], 412-624-9207

17

Keywords: Microbial mats, biodegradation, biological treatment, saline wastewater, hydraulic

18

fracturing, wastewater, produced water, flowback water

Corresponding Author: Kyle Bibby, 709 Benedum Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15261

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

19

ABSTRACT

20

Treatment of produced water, i.e. wastewater from hydraulic fracturing, for reuse or final

21

disposal is challenged by both high salinity and the presence of organic compounds. Organic

22

compounds in produced water may foul physical-chemical treatment processes, or support

23

microbial corrosion, fouling, and sulfide release. Biological approaches have potential

24

applications in produced water treatment, including reducing fouling of physical-chemical

25

treatment processes and decreasing biological activity during produced water holding; however,

26

conventional activated sludge treatments are intolerant of high salinity. In this study, a biofilm

27

treatment approach using constructed microbial mats was evaluated for biodegradation

28

performance, microbial community structure, and metabolic potential in both simulated and real

29

produced water. Results demonstrated that engineered microbial mats are active at total

30

dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations up to at least 100,000 mg/L, and experiments in real

31

produced water showed a biodegradation capacity of 1.45 mg COD/gramwet-day at a TDS

32

concentration of 91,351 mg/L. Additionally, microbial community and metagenomic analyses

33

revealed an adaptive microbial community that shifted based upon the sample being treated and

34

has the metabolic potential to degrade a wide array of contaminants, suggesting the potential of

35

this approach to treat produced waters with varying composition.

36

37

38

39

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 29

Page 3 of 29

Environmental Science & Technology

40

INTRODUCTION

41

Advances in high-volume hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling techniques have enabled

42

oil and gas production from unconventional reservoirs and have altered the current and future

43

energy landscape. In 2012, more than 34% of U.S. natural gas was produced from

44

unconventional resources,1 and that percentage is expected to increase.2 Additionally, shale gas

45

resources are globally distributed,3 with worldwide exploration expected to begin in the coming

46

decades. High-volume hydraulic fracturing involves the injection of 10-20 million liters of

47

fracture fluid at high pressure to fracture the target formation and stimulate reservoir

48

permeability.4 Following well completion, a portion (5% to greater than 100%) of the fracture

49

fluid mixed with subsurface brine returns to the surface as produced water.5, 6 Fracture fluid is

50

typically 99% water and sand, with the remaining 1% comprised of chemicals to regulate pH,

51

viscosity, and reduce friction, precipitation, scaling and biological fouling.4,

52

typically has an elevated total dissolved solids (TDS) concentration that ranges from 5,000 to

53

300,000 mg/L,7-9 including high concentrations of sodium, calcium, barium, strontium, chloride,

54

bromide and naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM).9,

55

typically contain a large suite of poorly defined organic compounds.11 A large volume of this

56

water is produced upon well completion and is known as ‘flowback water’; however, wells

57

continue to produce water during their entire operation. Here, the term ‘produced water’ is used

58

to refer to all wastewater generated during unconventional well operation. Produced water

59

characteristics are unique to each geological formation.10, 12

60

Water management challenges associated with hydraulic fracturing, including produced water

61

disposal and water sourcing for fracturing, have emerged at the forefront of the public and

62

regulatory discussion regarding hydraulic fracturing. Due to large volumes and high salt

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

10

6

Produced water

Produced waters also

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 4 of 29

63

concentrations, disposal and treatment options for produced water are limited. Treatment of

64

produced water in municipal wastewater treatment plants for surface disposal is no longer a

65

viable alternative with new regulations in effect.4 Deep well injection is one of the most common

66

methods for produced water disposal; however, some regions (e.g. Pennsylvania) have limited

67

deep well disposal capacity.4 Additionally, induced seismic activity has been associated with

68

deep well injection,13 suggesting the potential for future regulatory limitations to this disposal

69

approach. Finally, in some regions with suitable disposal capacity, there are concerns about the

70

environmental impacts of fresh water sourcing.6

71

Biological treatment is a promising and underexplored treatment technology to remove organic

72

compounds in high-salinity produced water. Biological treatment approaches may be used in

73

conjunction with physical-chemical treatment to limit energy costs and membrane fouling for

74

both produced water reuse in future hydraulic fracturing operations and final disposal.

75

Additionally, reduced concentrations of organic compounds due to biological treatment would

76

limit heterotrophic microbial growth during produced water holding, decreasing the need for

77

biocide use. Recently, the effect of dissolved solids on chemical oxygen demand (COD)

78

biodegradation in sequencing batch reactors was examined.14 While the biological removal of

79

COD decreased the membrane fouling potential, a significant decrease in COD degradation with

80

increasing salt concentration was observed,14 prompting further investigation into the suitability

81

and potential of biological treatment approaches for produced water. These results suggest the

82

need for more halo-tolerant biological treatment approaches.

83

Microbial mats, clustered biofilms of mixed microbial communities,15,

84

hypersaline habitats, with abundant microbial diversity.16, 20 Microbial mats have been used as a

85

bioremediation technique for more than twenty years, and are tolerant of high salinity as well as

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

16

occur naturally in

Page 5 of 29

Environmental Science & Technology

86

metal and metalloid toxicity.17 An early study demonstrated oil biodegradation by microbial mats

87

developing in an oil-contaminated area.18, 19 Hypersaline microbial mats are capable of removing

88

25-85% of model petroleum compounds, with performance decreasing as salinity increases.19-21

89

Various approaches have been attempted to cultivate microbial mats,16, 17, 22-24 including using

90

glass wool,17 coconut mesh,22 polyester fiber,23 silica particles,24 and grass silage16 as a growth

91

scaffold. Among these, grass silage has been found to perform well due to stimulation of rapid

92

microbial growth by providing a scaffold surface to support microbial growth and an initial

93

supply of nutrients including lactic acid, amino acids and various minerals.16

94

In the current study, microbial mats were constructed using grass silage, the degradation of

95

model compounds at various TDS concentrations was tested in both simulated and real produced

96

water, and biodegradation rates were evaluated. In addition, 16S rRNA and shotgun

97

metagenomic sequencing was performed to evaluate the microbial community structure and

98

metabolic potential of microbial mats treating produced water.

99

MATERIALS AND METHODS

100

Construction of engineered microbial mats

101

To prepare microbial mats, window screen was cut in approximately 2.5 centimeter diameter

102

circles, filled with grass silage (1 gram), and sewn together (Fig S1). Growth medium for the

103

microbial mats was comprised of 25 g/L Luria Bertani (LB) broth in deionized water (Synergy-R

104

purification system with 18.2 MΩ resistance) amended with 50,000 mg/L TDS (35 g/L NaCl, 15

105

g/L CaCl2). The growth media was seeded with 10% (v/v) of a mixed stock of produced water

106

and activated sludge from municipal wastewater. Prepared mats were then placed in the growth

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

107

medium in a 2 L plastic beaker and mixed continuously for 21 days to maintain aerobic

108

conditions. The same growth batch of microbial mats was used for each set of experiments.

109

Preparation of the test media

110

Microbial mats guar gum degradation capacity was tested in both synthetic and real hydraulic

111

fracturing produced water; acetate degradation was tested only in synthetic produced water.

112

Acetate was utilized as a model simple organic molecule, as a fermentation and breakdown

113

product from other complex organic molecules in fracturing fluid, such as guar gum, and has

114

previously been identified in produced water.25 In experiments conducted with synthetic

115

produced water media, NaCl and CaCl2 were added at a Na/Ca mass ratio of 3.510 to supply TDS

116

concentrations of 0, 50,000, 100,000, or 200,000 mg/L. For the synthetic produced water acetate

117

degradation experiment, a 5,000 mg/L acetate stock solution was prepared with 6.94 g/L sodium

118

acetate in deionized water. The stock solution was used to provide a 2,500 mg/L acetate

119

concentration to all test conditions. In the synthetic produced water guar gum degradation

120

experiment, guar gum solution was prepared using a modified approach of Lester et al.14 Guar

121

gum is a commonly used chemical in fracturing fluid to increase viscosity14 and was used here as

122

a representative complex organic COD source. Typical guar gum dosage in fracturing fluid

123

ranges from 600-4800 mg/L.26 Briefly, 3,000 mg/L guar gum was prepared with deionized water,

124

the supernatant was withdrawn after an 18-hour settling period and filtered through glass fiber

125

filters (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). The resulting filtrate had a COD value of

126

approximately 2,500 mg/L. Real produced water experiments were conducted with two different

127

produced water samples, Sample A and Sample B, together with each sample diluted one half,

128

Sample A1/2 and Sample B1/2. Sample characteristics are shown in Table 1. Sample A (182,702

129

mg/L TDS) was produced water from a well in southwest PA, and the biocide used in the

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 29

Page 7 of 29

Environmental Science & Technology

130

fracturing fluid was glutaraldehyde. Sample B (18,400 mg/L TDS) was from an open produced

131

water holding pond containing water from multiple wells in southwest PA that was maintained

132

with chlorine dioxide. All test conditions were supplemented with 2,500 mg COD/L guar gum as

133

described above. As the produced water samples used had low biodegradable COD

134

concentrations, guar gum addition was utilized to more accurately provide a degradation rate

135

estimate. Chemical details of all test media are included in Table 1.

136

Experimental Procedure

137

Prior to use, microbial mats were rinsed for 1.5 hours at 70 rpm in 50,000 mg/L TDS synthetic

138

produced water to limit the carryover of the cultivation media to the test medium. Following

139

rinsing, the wet weight of the mats was recorded and they were placed into 10 mL of test media

140

in 6-well plates (Corning Costar, Tewksbury, MA). For an initial homogenization period, 6-well

141

plates were placed on a shaker table at 110 rpm for 15 minutes and time zero sampling was

142

performed. Microbial mats were continuously shaken at 110 rpm throughout each experiment.

143

All conditions were sampled at 0, 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours. Successive loadings of test media were

144

performed, with each loading lasting 72 hours. The 72 hour loading period was chosen based

145

upon preliminary tests demonstrating limited substrate removal following this time period. Three

146

biological replicates were conducted for each test condition. Surface samples of the mats were

147

taken at the beginning and at the end of each cycle and stored at -20°C for later microbial

148

analysis.

149

High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, Agilent Technologies 1200 Series) and

150

HACH (Loveland, CO) COD kits were used to quantify acetate and guar gum, respectively. In

151

acetate experiments with synthetic produced water, 0.5 mL of liquid was withdrawn from each

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

152

well and centrifuged (Fisher Scientific, Accuspin Micro 17) at 4000xg for 5 minutes.

153

Supernatants were transferred to slip syringes (Fisher Scientific, Luer-Slip Syringes, 3 mL

154

capacity) and filtered through syringe filters (Fisher Scientific, Cellulose Syringe Filter, 0.2µm)

155

into microcentrifuge tubes (Fisher Scientific, 1.5 mL) and 0.2 mL from each filtered sample was

156

analyzed by HPLC. The HPLC was equipped with a refractive index detector and a Rezex ROA-

157

Organic Acid H+ (8%) column (Phenomenex Inc., Torrance, CA). The column was eluted with

158

0.005 N H2SO4 as a mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min at 50°C with a quaternary pump.

159

In guar gum experiments, 0.5 mL of liquid was withdrawn from each well, diluted 20 times with

160

deionized water, and filtered through 0.45 µm filter paper (Millipore MF-EMD, Billerica MA).

161

Filtered samples were stored at -20°C prior to analysis. The COD of the filtered samples were

162

measured with HACH LR (low range) COD vials and a DR850 HACH Colorimeter. Due to the

163

high salt content of samples, 0.5 g of mercuric sulfate (Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium) was

164

added to COD vials to decrease chloride interference.27 Standard errors were calculated with

165

biological triplicates of each test condition. Technical replicates of COD measurements were

166

performed for each time point.

167

Rate Analysis and Kinetics

168

Rate analysis was performed on all experiments to analyze COD removal. The assumed

169

theoretical COD value from acetate was 0.92 g acetate/g COD (64 g COD/mole acetate). The

170

second and third loadings of each experiment were utilized to determine the removal rates.

171

Reaction rate constants are shown in Table S1. The highest and lowest kinetic constants were

172

selected (denoted as highest and lowest performance, respectively) for each TDS condition.

173

Microbial Ecology

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 29

Page 9 of 29

Environmental Science & Technology

174

DNA was extracted from each sample using the PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit (MO BIO

175

Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA) and quantified using a Qubit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA).

176

The 16S rRNA region was PCR amplified using the 515F primer and 806R barcoded sequencing

177

primers as previously described.28 Additional details are included in the Supplemental

178

Information. Sequence reads were analyzed using QIIME 1.7.0.29 The sequences were

179

demultiplexed and filtered to remove sequences that did not contain a correct sample barcode

180

and did not have a quality score of Q20 or higher. Demultiplexed and quality filtered sequences

181

are available on MG-RAST30 (accession 4576856.3). Closed reference OTUs were predicted

182

from the quality filtered sequences (pick_closed_reference_otus.py) and assigned taxonomy

183

based on the Greengenes 13_8 database.31 For alpha diversity estimation, a single rarefaction

184

was run using 4500 random sequences from each sample and alpha diversity was calculated

185

using the observed_species metric.

186

DNA for metagenomic sequencing was prepared using Illumina’s Nextera XT DNA Sample

187

Preparation Kit (San Diego, CA) without kit normalization. Samples were denatured and pooled

188

to a final concentration of 12 pM. Sequencing was performed with a MiSeq reagent Kit V2 (500

189

cycles) (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Sequences were quality trimmed in CLC Genomics

190

Workbench 7.0.3 (CLC Bio, Aarhus, Denmark) by the following parameters: a Q score of Q30

191

or higher, a length greater than 100 bp, and the maximum number of ambiguities allowed was 2.

192

Quality filtered sequences were then assembled using a kmer of length 20 and a minimum contig

193

length of 500 bps. Assembled contigs were submitted to the MG-RAST server for annotation and

194

are available under accession numbers 4570162.3, 4570163.3, 4570164.3, and 4570165.3. In

195

MG-RAST, contigs were functionally annotated by the Subsystems pathways and KEGG

196

Orthology, extracted, and taxonomically assigned using Galaxy/MGTAXA.32

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 10 of 29

197

Statistical analysis was performed in Minitab statistical software (Versions 16 and 17, State

198

College, PA). One-way ANOVA analysis was conducted on biological removal data and a

199

pairwise comparison of each data set was performed. Confidence intervals (95%) and unequal

200

variances were assumed. Statistical analysis of removal rates was conducted by ANOVA

201

General Linear Model by selecting TDS as covariate with 95% confidence interval. For

202

microbial ecology statistical analysis, an ANOVA General Linear Model was run with 2 factors

203

(sample and cycle) along with interaction from the two factors with an individual family as the

204

response for taxonomic diversity or the number of observed species for alpha diversity. Grouping

205

information was obtained using Tukey comparisons at a 95% confidence level.

206

RESULTS

207

Synthetic Produced Water Experiments

208

Results from synthetic produced water experiments with acetate and guar gum are provided in

209

Figure 1A and B, respectively. The first loading cycle demonstrated significant performance

210

variability for all conditions, potentially due to growth media carryover or microbial community

211

adaptation. For acetate, the removal performance of the 0 and 50,000 mg/L total dissolved solids

212

(TDS) conditions were statistically indistinguishable (p=0.735), while the 100,000 mg/L TDS

213

condition demonstrated statistically significant decreased performance (p0.99 in all conditions) and lowest

239

removals (R2>0.96 for 0 and 50,000 mg/L and R2 =0.53 for 100,000 mg/L TDS) within a 72 hour

240

period. The second and third produced water loading cycles of each experiment were evaluated

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 12 of 29

241

to determine removal rates (Figure 2). Comparable removal rates were observed in 0 and 50,000

242

mg/L TDS conditions for degradation of each substrate, with reduced rates at 100,000 mg/L

243

TDS. No degradation was observed at 200,000 mg/L TDS. Microbial mats demonstrated higher

244

guar gum degradation rates in real produced water than in synthetic produced water (p=0.008).

245

Microbial Ecology

246

The microbial ecology of mats treating Sample A1/2, Sample B, and Sample B1/2 was analyzed

247

using high-throughput 16S rRNA sequencing. The ecology of mats treating Sample A was not

248

analyzed, as no degradation was observed. Samples were taken and analyzed prior to the first

249

loading and following the first and third loadings. After quality filtering, the number of

250

sequences ranged from 5,144–36,602 per sample (Table S2). Figure 3 shows the average class

251

level abundances for each condition. The taxonomic composition of the microbial mats differed

252

by the salinity of the sample being treated, while biological replicates tended to be more similar

253

in composition. ANOVA was performed on family level diversity to compare the microbial

254

community of the initial mats with the ecology of mats following operational cycles (Table S3).

255

Sample A1/2 exhibited a significant increase in Idiomarinaceae, specifically the genus

256

Idiomarina. All samples except Sample A1/2 at the end of the first loading showed a significant

257

decrease in the Campylobacteraceae, specifically the genus Arcobacter. Sample B showed a

258

significant increase in the Rhodospirillaceae family while Sample B1/2 showed a slight increase,

259

corresponding to the genus Novispirillum, which is not generally considered to be halotolerant.

260

This is reflected in Figure 3 by the large increase in Alphaproteobacteria in the Sample B mats at

261

the end of the third loading.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 13 of 29

Environmental Science & Technology

262

Alpha diversity was calculated to estimate the number of species observed in each sample (Table

263

S2). An ANOVA General Linear Model was run on the data to observe statistical differences

264

between sample types and cycles. The mats at time zero, along with the Sample A1/2 mats were

265

found to have a significantly lower number of species than microbial communities from Sample

266

B from the later cycles.

267

Four metagenomes were generated in this study: two mats treating Sample A1/2 (91,351 mg/L

268

TDS) and two mats treating Sample B (18,400 mg/L TDS), all from the end of the third loading.

269

These conditions were chosen to provide replication and a range of salinity concentrations, while

270

maximizing sequencing coverage. Results from sequencing are included in Tables S4-S6. While

271

differing slightly from 16S rRNA sequencing data, metagenomic taxonomic data (Figure 3)

272

exhibited general trends from 16S rRNA sequencing, such as an increase in the

273

Alphaproteobacteria population in the Sample B mats. At the genus level, the Sample A1/2

274

metagenomes also captured an increase in the Idiomarina population similar to the 16S rRNA

275

data (Table S5). The metagenomes were analyzed for carbon metabolism pathways and stress

276

response subsystems. Guar gum is composed of a mannan backbone with galactose residues

277

attached.33 In addition to the enzymes necessary for guar gum degradation, the mat samples

278

included necessary genes for diverse carbohydrate degradation, including xylose, ribose,

279

fructose, sucrose, and glycogen (Figures S2 and S3). Additionally, the metagenomes evidenced a

280

wide range of stress response mechanisms. Mechanisms of osmotic stress response in the mat

281

communities include choline and betaine uptake and sodium antiporters.

282

To relate functional annotations with observed shifts in the microbial community, functionally

283

annotated metagenomic sequences were extracted and taxonomically classified. Specific

284

functional annotations investigated included carbohydrate, galactose, and mannose/fructose

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 14 of 29

285

metabolism, and oxidative and osmotic stress response (Figure 4). Results demonstrated that

286

functional microbial community changes mirrored taxonomic shifts. Specifically, analyses

287

showed an increased abundance of Alphaproteobacteria, Flavobacteriia and Sphingobacteriia in

288

Sample B compared to Sample A1/2, and Sample A1/2 demonstrated an increased abundance of

289

Gammaproteobacteria and Bacteroidia. Moreover, analyses at the genus level (Table S4)

290

indicated that the most abundant genera associated with carbohydrate metabolism were

291

Halomonas, Marinobacterium, and Marinobacter in Sample A1/2, and Vibrio and

292

Flavobacterium in Sample B.

293

DISCUSSION

294

This study demonstrates the ability of engineered microbial mats to treat saline hydraulic

295

fracturing produced water. Several concerns (e.g. fouling, souring, and corrosion) regarding

296

produced water holding and reuse have emerged, generally requiring some level of treatment

297

before reuse, and biocide application during holding. Currently, nearly all produced water

298

treatment is physical-chemical and generally involves transportation to a centralized facility.

299

Biological produced water treatment approaches may be combined with physical-chemical

300

treatment to reduce process fouling, or applied prior to produced water holding to reduce

301

biological activity. The development of on-site and low-cost treatment options, including biofilm

302

processes such as microbial mats, will encourage produced water reuse in future hydraulic

303

fracturing operations, reducing the environmental impacts of fresh water sourcing, produced

304

water transportation and disposal, and excess chemical usage. For example, biocide application

305

is commonly used to control biological activity during produced water holding, often with

306

limited efficacy.34, 35 Biological treatment to remove available electron donors has the potential

307

to decrease heterotrophic microbial growth and the necessity of biocide use. It is envisioned that

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 15 of 29

Environmental Science & Technology

308

microbial mats may be used as either an on-site technology during produced water holding or

309

coupled with physical-chemical treatment to reduce process fouling, although additional

310

evaluation is necessary to determine the best application of this technology.

311

Microbial mat treatment experiments conducted for two different substrates in synthetic and real

312

produced water demonstrated similar trends. For all experiments, the first sample loading

313

showed significant performance variability. This is likely due to the acclimation period of the

314

microorganisms36 or growth medium leaching from the mats to the test medium. Our approach

315

was to treat the first cycle as a wash and adaption step and exclude it from further rate

316

evaluation. After several successive loadings, the biodegradation performance decreased with a

317

steeper decrease at higher TDS concentrations. This behavior could be a result of a reduction in

318

mat activity due to nutrient limitation, salinity stresses, or starvation between cycles. The highest

319

biodegradation rates were observed at 0 and 50,000 mg/L TDS conditions for both acetate and

320

guar gum. The 100,000 mg/L TDS condition exhibited a decreased rate, and no biological

321

substrate removal was observed in the 200,000 mg/L TDS condition. Tests in real produced

322

water reflected trends observed in synthetic produced water. A similar trend was seen in real

323

produced water experiments, where the performance of mats decreased in Sample A1/2 (91,351

324

mg/L TDS) and no biodegradation occurred in Sample A (182,702 mg/L TDS), similar to the test

325

conditions with salt concentrations of 100,000 and 200,000 mg/L TDS, respectively. Improved

326

COD removal in real produced water is likely due to constituents in the produced water, such as

327

trace minerals, organics, nutrients, or salts. Additionally, it has been shown that trace minerals

328

(e.g. Mg, Fe) have a significant effect on cell viability during starvation conditions.37 As

329

demonstrated by microbial mats treating synthetic produced water, salinity had a strong role in

330

driving the performance of the mats. In real produced water, uncharacterized compounds,

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 16 of 29

331

including biocides, may have influenced the performance; however, these results demonstrate the

332

ability of microbial mats to perform in actual produced water samples.

333

The influence of salinity on microbiological treatment performance has long been recognized.38

334

Previous studies have demonstrated that activated sludge treatment systems experience a sharp

335

decrease in COD removal efficiency above TDS concentrations of 10,000 mg/L,39,

336

decrease in the COD removal efficiency from 85% to 59% when the TDS concentration

337

increased from zero to 50,000 mg/L.40 A recent study evaluating the efficiency of activated

338

sludge to treat synthetic produced water demonstrated a 60% removal efficiency in 31 hours at a

339

salt concentration of 45,000 mg/L.14 The current study demonstrates guar gum COD removals of

340

66% and 45% COD at 50,000 and 100,000 mg/L TDS concentrations, respectively. A rate

341

analysis (Figure 2) demonstrated that the acetate degradation rate by microbial mats was higher

342

than the guar gum degradation rate, likely due to the simpler chemical structure of acetate. Both

343

acetate and guar gum showed similar removal rate trends with increasing salt concentration.

344

Microbial ecology analyses were performed to further the understanding of degradation and

345

survival mechanisms of microbial communities in engineered microbial mats. The microbial mat

346

community composition was strongly driven by the sample being treated. Mats treating higher

347

TDS samples exhibited a lower alpha-diversity, while the microbial community of mats treating

348

lower TDS samples diverged throughout the study, suggesting salinity constrained microbial

349

diversity. Idiomarina increased with each treatment cycle in the higher salinity Sample A1/2,

350

suggesting this may be an important population in mats treating higher salinity produced water.

351

This genus is comprised of moderate halophiles that are generally strict aerobes41, 42 and have

352

been isolated from various marine environments, including a hypersaline solar saltern.43 They

353

have a high content of iso-branched fatty acids and certain species produce large amounts of

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

40

and a

Page 17 of 29

Environmental Science & Technology

354

extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) to facilitate biofilm formation, both of which would

355

assist growth in the harsh conditions of high salinity produced water,44,

356

salinity protection for the biofilm. Idiomarina cannot use carbohydrates as their sole carbon and

357

energy sources, instead using amino acids to obtain carbon and energy,44 and cannot utilize

358

mannose for energy. This suggests that they cannot grow on guar gum alone,41,

359

require amino acids synthesized by the microbial community for survival.

360

Microbial community analyses of microbial mats in this study demonstrate similar trends as

361

previous studies of the microbial communities in oil and gas wastewater treatment and hydraulic

362

fracturing produced

363

Gammaproteobacteria classes have previously been found to degrade 80-100% of polycyclic

364

aromatic hydrocarbons in crude-oil contaminated marine water.46 Additionally, microbial

365

community analysis of an acetate-fed denitrification reactor showed increased abundance of

366

Gammaproteobacteria with increasing salinity,47 consistent with trends observed here. Finally,

367

previous studies of the microbial ecology of early stage produced water have identified the

368

predominance of Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Bacteroidia, and Clostridia,48, 49

369

consistent with the dominant microbial groups identified in microbial mats following three

370

cycles of treatment.

371

Functional metagenomic analysis demonstrated the presence of metabolic pathways necessary to

372

degrade the substrate (guar gum) and respond to the saline conditions. To gain a more

373

fundamental understanding of how microbial community shifts affected the desired functional

374

potential of the microbial community, we extracted functionally annotated genes and assigned

375

them to microbial taxa. Taxonomic assignment of functional metagenomic subsets largely

376

mirrored the shifts observed via 16S rRNA microbial community profiling, suggesting that

water.

Moderate halophiles

from

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

45

and may provide

42

and likely

the Alphaproteobacteria

and

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 18 of 29

377

observed shifts were to maximize functional potential. Specifically, in Sample A1/2 the taxa

378

associated with carbon metabolism demonstrated an increased abundance of Halomonas,

379

Marinilabilia and Marinobacterium (Table S6). Strains of Halomonas are able to grow at salt

380

concentrations of 3-15% (w/v) and utilize D-galactose and D-mannose.50 Moreover, certain

381

strains of Marinilabilia are known to have α- and β-glucosidase and α-galactosidase,51,

382

some species of Marinobacterium can use D-galactose as a sole carbon source.53 In Sample B, a

383

higher abundance of the genera Vibrio and Flavobacterium was observed in subsystems

384

associated with carbohydrate metabolism. Certain strains of Vibrio are known to produce

385

extracellular or capsular polysaccharide consisting several types of sugars including D-galactose

386

and D-mannose, suggesting related metabolisms.54-57 Several recently isolated species of

387

Flavobacterium can tolerate salt concentrations up to 5% (w/v NaCl) and produce acid from D-

388

mannose,

389

Rhodobacteraceae and Hyphomonadaceae, were observed to be significantly more abundant in

390

the osmotic and oxidative stress response categories in the less saline Sample B, suggesting that

391

the observed increase in abundance of Alphaproteobacteria was related to the decreased salinity.

392

Taxonomic assignment of functionally annotated metagenomes demonstrated that observed

393

microbial community shifts were in response to the composition of the samples being treated.

394

Mats treating both Sample B and Sample B1/2 became more diverse in the number of operational

395

taxonomic units (OTUs) that could be detected with each successive treatment cycle. Most of

396

these newly detected taxa were present at low relative abundance and are not known halophiles.

397

These emergent species were likely present at low relative abundance from initial cultivation,

398

and were able to become a larger percentage of the mat microbial community with the reduction

399

in salinity; however, as the produced water was not sterilized prior to use, the potential for

D-galactose

and

D-fructose.58

Classes

of

Alphaproteobacteria,

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

52

and

including

Page 19 of 29

Environmental Science & Technology

400

growth of native microorganisms cannot be excluded. Mat microbial communities demonstrated

401

compositional differences by the end of the first loading, suggesting rapid adaptation to new

402

environments, such as produced waters with changing chemical and biological characteristics.

403

Additionally, metagenome data evidenced the potential of mat microbial communities to adapt to

404

different substrates, as well as different salt and metal concentrations through various stress

405

response mechanisms. Produced water characteristics vary both between and within

406

unconventional oil and gas plays.10,

407

microbial mats for the treatment of produced water of various composition and TDS

408

concentrations by maintaining a population of diverse microbes that can grow to suit a particular

409

environment. Additional work is necessary to identify the role of cultivation conditions on mat

410

performance, and optimal cultivation conditions.

411

In the current study, the biodegradation performance of engineered microbial mats was

412

investigated in both synthetic and real produced water, with acetate and guar gum utilized to

413

simulate simple and complex substrates. Our experiments demonstrate that engineered microbial

414

mats are capable of degrading COD in a broad range of salt concentrations. Furthermore,

415

microbial ecology analyses demonstrate that engineered microbial mats are capable of adapting

416

to different produced waters to effectively degrade COD. Results suggest the potential

417

applicability of microbial mats for produced water treatment within a wide range of salinity

418

concentrations, and rates were found to be zero-order. While further work is necessary to

419

understand the scale-up requirements of microbial mats for produced water treatment, microbial

420

mats represent an emerging biological treatment technology to encourage produced water reuse,

421

improve the performance of physical-chemical treatment approaches, remove organic

422

constituents, and reduce biocide application. Biological produced water treatment approaches,

12

These results demonstrate the potential for utilizing

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

423

including microbial mats, have the potential to decrease the operational costs and improve the

424

efficiency of treating produced water from hydraulic fracturing. Ultimately, improved produced

425

water treatment will serve to address a significant source of public and regulatory concern

426

surrounding the environmental impacts of the hydraulic fracturing process.

427

428

ACKKNOWLEDGEMENTS:

429

This work was funded by a United States National Science Foundation EAGER award

430

(1353858) to KB.

431

432

Supporting Information Available:

433

This information is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org/.

434

435

REFERENCES:

436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447

1.

EIA U.S. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production. http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_prod_sum_dcu_NUS_m.htm (September 2014), 2. EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2014, with projections to 2040; U.S. Energy Information Administration: Washington, D.C., 2014; pp MT-6, A-28,. 3. EIA Today in energy. http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=11611 (8/20/2014), 4. Lutz, B. D.; Lewis, A. N.; Doyle, M. W., Generation, transport, and disposal of wastewater associated with Marcellus Shale gas development. Water Resources Research 2013, 49, (2), 647-656. 5. Bibby, K. J.; Brantley, S. L.; Reible, D. D.; Linden, K. G.; Mouser, P. J.; Gregory, K. B.; Ellis, B. R.; Vidic, R. D., Suggested Reporting Parameters for Investigations of Wastewater from Unconventional Shale Gas Extraction. Environmental Science & Technology 2013, 47, (23), 13220-13221.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 20 of 29

Page 21 of 29

448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492

Environmental Science & Technology

6. Gregory, K. B.; Vidic, R. D.; Dzombak, D. A., Water Management Challenges Associated with the Production of Shale Gas by Hydraulic Fracturing. Elements 2011, 7, (3), 181-186. 7. Acharya, H. R.; Henderson, C.; Matis, H.; Kommepalli, H.; Moore, B.; Wang, H. In Cost effective recovery of low-TDS frac flowback water for re-use, Ground Water Protection Council Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, 2010; 2010. 8. Kargbo, D. M.; Wilhelm, R. G.; Campbell, D. J., Natural gas plays in the Marcellus shale: Challenges and potential opportunities. Environmental Science & Technology 2010, 44, (15), 5679-5684. 9. Warner, N. R.; Christie, C. A.; Jackson, R. B.; Vengosh, A., Impacts of shale gas wastewater disposal on water quality in Western Pennsylvania. Environmental science & technology 2013, 47, (20), 11849-11857. 10. Barbot, E.; Vidic, N. S.; Gregory, K. B.; Vidic, R. D., Spatial and Temporal Correlation of Water Quality Parameters of Produced Waters from Devonian-Age Shale following Hydraulic Fracturing. Environmental science & technology 2013, 47, (6), 2562-2569. 11. Lester, Y.; Ferrer, I.; Thurman, E. M.; Sitterley, K. A.; Korak, J. A.; Aiken, G.; Linden, K. G., Characterization of hydraulic fracturing flowback water in Colorado: Implications for water treatment. Science of The Total Environment 2015, 512–513, (0), 637-644. 12. Mauter, M. S.; Alvarez, P. J. J.; Burton, A.; Cafaro, D. C.; Chen, W.; Gregory, K. B.; Jiang, G.; Li, Q.; Pittock, J.; Reible, D.; Schnoor, J. L., Regional Variation in Water-Related Impacts of Shale Gas Development and Implications for Emerging International Plays. Environmental Science & Technology 2014, 48, (15), 8298-8306. 13. Keranen, K.; Weingarten, M.; Abers, G.; Bekins, B.; Ge, S., Sharp increase in central Oklahoma seismicity since 2008 induced by massive wastewater injection. Science 2014, 345, (6195), 448-451. 14. Lester, Y.; Yacob, T.; Morrissey, I.; Linden, K. G., Can We Treat Hydraulic Fracturing Flowback with a Conventional Biological Process? The Case of Guar Gum. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2013. 15. Ley, R. E.; Harris, J. K.; Wilcox, J.; Spear, J. R.; Miller, S. R.; Bebout, B. M.; Maresca, J. A.; Bryant, D. A.; Sogin, M. L.; Pace, N. R., Unexpected Diversity and Complexity of the Guerrero Negro Hypersaline Microbial Mat. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2006, 72, (5), 3685-3695. 16. Bender, J.; Phillips, P., Microbial mats for multiple applications in aquaculture and bioremediation. Bioresource Technology 2004, 94, (3), 229-238. 17. Bender, J.; Lee, R.; Phillips, P., Uptake and transformation of metals and metalloids by microbial mats and their use in bioremediation. Journal of Industrial Microbiology 1995, 14, (2), 113-118. 18. Cohen, Y., Bioremediation of oil by marine microbial mats. International Microbiology 2002, 5, (4), 189-193. 19. Grötzschel, S.; Köster, J.; Abed, R. M.; de Beer, D., Degradation of petroleum model compounds immobilized on clay by a hypersaline microbial mat. Biodegradation 2002, 13, (4), 273-283. 20. Abed, R. M.; Al Thukair, A.; De Beer, D., Bacterial diversity of a cyanobacterial mat degrading petroleum compounds at elevated salinities and temperatures. FEMS microbiology ecology 2006, 57, (2), 290-301.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538

21. Ward, D. M.; Brock, T., Hydrocarbon biodegradation in hypersaline environments. Applied and environmental microbiology 1978, 35, (2), 353-359. 22. Phillips, P.; Bender, J.; Rodrıguez-Eaton, S.; Gould, J.; Shea-Albin, V. In Removal of metals from mine drainage by microbial mats, Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Environmental Issues and Waste Management in Energy and Mineral Production, 1996; 1996; pp 475-482. 23. Lehr, J. H.; Lehr, J. K., Standard handbook of environmental science, health, and technology. McGraw-Hill New York: 2000. 24. Bender, J.; Duff, M. C.; Phillips, P.; Hill, M., Bioremediation and Bioreduction of Dissolved U(VI) by Microbial Mat Consortium Supported on Silica Gel Particles. Environmental Science & Technology 2000, 34, (15), 3235-3241. 25. Olsson, O.; Weichgrebe, D.; Rosenwinkel, K.-H., Hydraulic fracturing wastewater in Germany: composition, treatment, concerns. Environmental Earth Sciences 2013, 70, (8), 38953906. 26. Thomas, A.; Gaillard, N.; Favero, C. In Novel Associative Acrylamide-based Polymers for Proppant Transport in Hydraulic Fracturing Fluids, SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, 2013; Society of Petroleum Engineers: 2013. 27. HACH Company. http://www.hach.com/cod-digestion-vials-low-range-pk-150/productdownloads?id=7640193205 (8/20/14), 28. Caporaso, J. G.; Lauber, C. L.; Walters, W. A.; Berg-Lyons, D.; Huntley, J.; Fierer, N.; Owens, S. M.; Betley, J.; Fraser, L.; Bauer, M., Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. The ISME journal 2012, 6, (8), 1621-1624. 29. Caporaso, J. G.; Kuczynski, J.; Stombaugh, J.; Bittinger, K.; Bushman, F. D.; Costello, E. K.; Fierer, N.; Pena, A. G.; Goodrich, J. K.; Gordon, J. I., QIIME allows analysis of highthroughput community sequencing data. Nature methods 2010, 7, (5), 335-336. 30. Meyer, F.; Paarmann, D.; D'Souza, M.; Olson, R.; Glass, E. M.; Kubal, M.; Paczian, T.; Rodriguez, A.; Stevens, R.; Wilke, A., The metagenomics RAST server–a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC bioinformatics 2008, 9, (1), 386. 31. DeSantis, T. Z.; Hugenholtz, P.; Larsen, N.; Rojas, M.; Brodie, E. L.; Keller, K.; Huber, T.; Dalevi, D.; Hu, P.; Andersen, G. L., Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Applied and environmental microbiology 2006, 72, (7), 5069-5072. 32. Tovchigrechko, A. S., Seung-Jin Galaxy/MGTAXA Web server. http://mgtaxa.jcvi.org/ (2015, Feb 2), 33. Hartemink, R.; Schoustra, S. E.; Rombouts, F. M., Degradation of guar gum by intestinal bacteria. Biosci. Microflora 1999, 18, 17-25. 34. Vikram, A.; Lipus, D.; Bibby, K., Produced Water Exposure Alters Bacterial Response to Biocides. Environmental Science & Technology 2014, 48, (21), 13001-13009. 35. Gaspar, J.; Mathieu, J.; Yang, Y.; Tomson, R.; Leyris, J. D.; Gregory, K. B.; Alvarez, P. J. J., Microbial Dynamics and Control in Shale Gas Production. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2014, 1, (12), 465-473. 36. Alexander, M., Biodegradation and bioremediation. Gulf Professional Publishing: 1999. 37. Kim, D.-S.; Thomas, S.; Fogler, H. S., Effects of pH and trace minerals on long-term starvation of Leuconostoc mesenteroides. Applied and environmental microbiology 2000, 66, (3), 976-981.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 22 of 29

Page 23 of 29

539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582

Environmental Science & Technology

38. McCarty, P. L., Anaerobic waste treatment fundamentals. Public works 1964, 95, (9), 107-112. 39. Uygur, A.; Kargı, F., Salt inhibition on biological nutrient removal from saline wastewater in a sequencing batch reactor. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2004, 34, (3), 313318. 40. Kargi, F.; Dincer, A. R., Biological treatment of saline wastewater by fed batch operation. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 1997, 69, (2), 167-172. 41. Ivanova, E. P.; Romanenko, L. A.; Chun, J.; Matte, M. H.; Matte, G. R.; Mikhailov, V. V.; Svetashev, V. I.; Huq, A.; Maugel, T.; Colwell, R. R., Idiomarina gen. nov., comprising novel indigenous deep-sea bacteria from the Pacific Ocean, including descriptions of two species, Idiomarina abyssalis sp. nov. and Idiomarina zobellii sp. nov. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology 2000, 50, (2), 901-907. 42. Martínez-Cánovas, M. J.; Béjar, V.; Martínez-Checa, F.; Páez, R.; Quesada, E., Idiomarina fontislapidosi sp. nov. and Idiomarina ramblicola sp. nov., isolated from inland hypersaline habitats in Spain. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology 2004, 54, (5), 1793-1797. 43. Choi, D. H.; Cho, B. C., Idiomarina seosinensis sp. nov., isolated from hypersaline water of a solar saltern in Korea. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology 2005, 55, (1), 379-383. 44. Hou, S.; Saw, J. H.; Lee, K. S.; Freitas, T. A.; Belisle, C.; Kawarabayasi, Y.; Donachie, S. P.; Pikina, A.; Galperin, M. Y.; Koonin, E. V., Genome sequence of the deep-sea γproteobacterium Idiomarina loihiensis reveals amino acid fermentation as a source of carbon and energy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2004, 101, (52), 18036-18041. 45. Donachie, S. P.; Hou, S.; Gregory, T. S.; Malahoff, A.; Alam, M., Idiomarina loihiensis sp. nov., a halophilic γ-Proteobacterium from the Lō ‘ihi submarine volcano, Hawai ‘i. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology 2003, 53, (6), 1873-1879. 46. Arulazhagan, P.; Vasudevan, N., Role of a moderately halophilic bacterial consortium in the biodegradation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons. Marine pollution bulletin 2009, 58, (2), 256262. 47. Osaka, T.; Shirotani, K.; Yoshie, S.; Tsuneda, S., Effects of carbon source on denitrification efficiency and microbial community structure in a saline wastewater treatment process. Water research 2008, 42, (14), 3709-3718. 48. Murali Mohan, A.; Hartsock, A.; Bibby, K. J.; Hammack, R. W.; Vidic, R. D.; Gregory, K. B., Microbial community changes in hydraulic fracturing fluids and produced water from shale gas extraction. Environmental science & technology 2013, 47, (22), 13141-13150. 49. Cluff, M. A.; Hartsock, A.; MacRae, J. D.; Carter, K.; Mouser, P. J., Temporal changes in microbial ecology and geochemistry in produced water from hydraulically fractured Marcellus Shale gas wells. Environmental science & technology 2014, 48, (11), 6508-6517. 50. Mata, J. A.; Martínez-Cánovas, J.; Quesada, E.; Béjar, V., A detailed phenotypic characterisation of the type strains of Halomonas species. Systematic and Applied Microbiology 2002, 25, (3), 360-375. 51. Kumar, S.; Subramanian, S.; Raghava, G. P. S.; Pinnaka, A. K., Genome sequence of the marine bacterium Marinilabilia salmonicolor JCM 21150T. Journal of bacteriology 2012, 194, (14), 3746-3746.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604

52. Shalley, S.; Kumar, S. P.; Srinivas, T. N. R.; Suresh, K.; Kumar, P. A., Marinilabilia nitratireducens sp. nov., a lipolytic bacterium of the family Marinilabiliaceae isolated from marine solar saltern. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2013, 103, (3), 519-525. 53. Kim, Y.-G.; Jin, Y.-A.; Hwang, C. Y.; Cho, B. C., Marinobacterium rhizophilum sp. nov., isolated from the rhizosphere of the coastal tidal-flat plant Suaeda japonica. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology 2008, 58, (1), 164-167. 54. Bramhachari, P.; Dubey, S., Isolation and characterization of exopolysaccharide produced by Vibrio harveyi strain VB23. Letters in applied microbiology 2006, 43, (5), 571-577. 55. Wai, S. N.; Mizunoe, Y.; Takade, A.; Kawabata, S.-I.; Yoshida, S.-I., Vibrio cholerae O1 strain TSI-4 produces the exopolysaccharide materials that determine colony morphology, stress resistance, and biofilm formation. Applied and environmental microbiology 1998, 64, (10), 36483655. 56. Enos-Berlage, J. L.; McCarter, L. L., Relation of capsular polysaccharide production and colonial cell organization to colony morphology in Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Journal of bacteriology 2000, 182, (19), 5513-5520. 57. Thompson, F. L.; Iida, T.; Swings, J., Biodiversity of vibrios. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews 2004, 68, (3), 403-431. 58. McCammon, S. A.; Bowman, J. P., Taxonomy of Antarctic Flavobacterium species: description of Flavobacterium gillisiae sp. nov., Flavobacterium tegetincola sp. nov., and Flavobacterium xanthum sp. nov., nom. rev. and reclassification of [Flavobacterium] salegens as Salegentibacter salegens gen. nov., comb. nov. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology 2000, 50, (3), 1055-1063.

605

606

607 608 609 610 611 612 613

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 24 of 29

Page 25 of 29

614

Environmental Science & Technology

Table 1. Chemical characteristics of Synthetic Produced Water, Sample A, and Sample B Constituent

615

Sample A

Sample B

Na (mg/L) 47,107.2 5,272 Ca (mg/L) 16,509.14 1,691 Mg (mg/L) 1,820.2 193 Ba (mg/L) 328.26 14.61 Sr (mg/L) 1,888.39 1,051.3 Fe (mg/L) 19 4.22 Cl (mg/L) 115,277.6 13,867 COD (mg/L) 1,865 440 TDS (mg/L) 182,702 18,400 pH 5.89 7.35 Days after Fracture 20 N/A a : Example synthetic media given for 50,000 mg/L TDS condition.

616 617

618 619

TOC Art

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Synthetic Produced Watera 17,500 5,000 0 0 0 0 27,500 2,500 50,000 6.66 N/A

Environmental Science & Technology

620

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 26 of 29

Page 27 of 29

621 622 623 624 625

Environmental Science & Technology

Figure 1. Microbial mat treatment of various substrates. A. Acetate removed in synthetic produced water as a function of time; B. COD (guar gum) removed in synthetic produced water as a function of time; C. COD (guar gum) removed in real produced water as a function of time. Each 72-hour loading is denoted by a dark vertical line. Data shown is the average of biological triplicates for each conditions. Error bars represent +/- 1 standard deviation.

626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634

Figure 2. Microbial mat substrate removal rates in synthetic and real produced water. Data shown is the average of biological triplicates for each conditions. Error bars represent +/- 1 standard deviation.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 28 of 29

635 636 637 638 639

Figure 3. Normalized plot of average class abundance for triplicate (microbial community) or duplicate (metagenome) microbial mats treating guar gum amended produced water. ‘Other’ indicates sequences that could not be annotated to the class level or of classes that comprised less than 2% of relative abundance.

640

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 29 of 29

Environmental Science & Technology

641 642 643 644

Figure 4. Taxonomic assignment to metagenomic data from microbial mats associated with carbon metabolism and stress response pathways. ‘Other’ indicates classes below 2% abundance in all metabolisms in averaged samples.

645

ACS Paragon Plus Environment