Microbial Transglutaminase Used in Bread Preparation at Standard

about tariff impact. Slapping a 25% tariff on $200 billion worth of Chinese imports would raise the prices of countless products... POLICY CONCENT...
0 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
Subscriber access provided by University of Florida | Smathers Libraries

Article

Microbial transglutaminase used in bread preparation at standard bakery concentrations does not increase immuno-detectable amounts of deamidated gliadin Andreas Heil, Jürgen Ohsam, Bernard van Genugten, Oscar Diez, Keiichi Yokoyama, Yoshiyuki Kumazawa, Ralf Pasternack, and Martin Hils J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02414 • Publication Date (Web): 19 Jul 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on July 20, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

Microbial transglutaminase used in bread preparation at standard bakery

2

concentrations does not increase immuno-detectable amounts of deamidated

3

gliadin

4 5

Andreas Heil1, Jürgen Ohsam1, Bernard van Genugten2, Oscar Diez2, Keiichi

6

Yokoyama3, Yoshiyuki Kumazawa3, Ralf Pasternack1, Martin Hils1,*

7

1

Zedira GmbH, Roesslerstrasse 83, Darmstadt, 64293, Germany

8

2

AB Enzymes GmbH, Feldbergstrasse 78, Darmstadt, 64293, Germany

9

3

Ajinomoto Co., Inc., Institute of Food Sciences & Technologies, 1-1, Suzuki-Cho,

10

Kawasaki-Ku, Kawasaki-Shi, 2010-8681, Japan

11 12

* Corresponding author: phone +49 6151 325110; fax +49 6151 325119; e-mail:

13

[email protected] (M. Hils)

14 15

Conflict of interest statement

16

The authors declare the following competing financial interests: R.P., M.H., A.H., and

17

J.O. are shareholders and/or employees of Zedira. K.Y. and Y.K. are employees of

18

Ajinomoto. B.v.G. and O.D. are employees of AB Enzymes. Zedira received financial

19

support from Ajinomoto to perform this study. Ajinomoto did not participate in the

20

analysis and interpretation of the data.

21 22 1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 2 of 33

23

Abstract

24

The effect of standard bakery concentrations of microbial transglutaminase (MTG) in

25

wheat bread preparation on the immunoreactivity of celiac disease (CD) patients’

26

sera was investigated.

27

Immunoblotting using monoclonal

28

deamidated gliadin showed no differences between control bread and MTG-bread.

29

Deamidation of gliadin could not be detected at standard MTG concentrations.

30

CD patients’ sera were characterized using anti-gliadin and anti-DGP ELISA and

31

grouped into DGP high and low titer pools. The recognition pattern obtained after

32

using both CD sera pools for immunoblotting did not reveal differences between

33

control and MTG-treated bread protein extracts.

34

Our results indicate that MTG-treatment of wheat bread prepared with typical MTG

35

concentrations used in standard bakery processes does not lead to immuno-

36

detectable amounts of CD-immunotoxic deamidated gliadins.

antibodies

specific

to unmodified

37 38

Keywords:

39

microbial transglutaminase, celiac disease, gliadin, wheat bread

40

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

and/or

Page 3 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

41

Introduction

42

Celiac disease (CD) is an autoimmune disorder triggered by the ingestion of gluten

43

derived from cereals like wheat, rye, or barley in susceptible individuals.1 The major

44

symptom of CD is chronic inflammation of the small intestine, combined with severe

45

damage of the intestinal mucosa. The wheat grain storage protein gluten is

46

composed of alcohol-soluble gliadins and propanol/urea/DTE-soluble glutenins.

47

Proteins present in the gliadin fraction, e.g. α- and γ-gliadins, are characterized by a

48

high content of proline. This renders gliadin resistant to proteolytic cleavage by

49

digestive enzymes of the gastro-intestinal tract. However, gliadins are broken down

50

into oligopeptides containing up to several dozen amino acids reaching the intestinal

51

mucosa. Another characteristic of these peptides is the high content of glutamine

52

residues in close proximity with prolins and hydrophobic residues, resulting in

53

multiple copies of the peptide motive QXPF in their sequence. This motif is a

54

preferred substrate sequence for human tissue transglutaminase (TG2). Under the

55

specific conditions in the inflamed gut TG2 catalyzes deamidation of glutamines

56

instead of cross-linking, which is the general function of transglutaminases.2,3

57

Deamidation results in a strong increase in affinity of the gliadin peptides towards

58

HLA-DQ2/8 receptors present on antigen presenting cells. Binding of deamidated

59

gliadin to HLA-DQ2/8 leads to CD4+ T helper 1 cells mediated intestinal

60

inflammation.4 In addition it leads to the production of antibodies against deamidated

61

gliadin peptides (DGP) as well as auto-antibodies against the endogenous TG2.2,5,6

62

These (auto)antibodies are used as standard serological markers in CD

63

diagnostics 6,7, whereas anti-gliadin antibodies can also be related to other diseases.8

64

The vicious circle of inflammation, transglutaminase release, deamidation of gliadin,

65

and further immune stimulation currently can only be stopped by adhering to a

66

completely gluten-free diet.9 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

67

Microbial transglutaminase (MTG) is an enzyme derived from Streptomyces

68

mobaraensis and catalyzes cross-linking of protein-bound glutamine to protein-bound

69

lysine. Although it has a similar catalytic mechanism, it is not related to eukaryotic

70

transglutaminases in structure or sequence but is a result of convergent evolution.

71

Most importantly, and in contrast to human transglutaminases, the microbial enzyme

72

does not require Ca2+ for catalytic activity, thus enabling its industrial application.

73

Under certain conditions, transglutaminases may also catalyze deamidation of

74

protein-bound glutamine residues forming the respective glutamic acid. While TG2

75

shows equal cross-linking and deamidation activities under the slightly acidic

76

conditions as given in the duodenum this is not the case for MTG. Over a broad pH-

77

range from 4 – 9 the deamidation activity of MTG constantly is more than a

78

magnitude lower than its cross-linking tendency.10

79

The idea of a potential generation of CD-specific deamidated gliadin epitopes

80

resulting from MTG-treatment of gluten-containing food was described in 2005.11 It is

81

based on the hypothesis that MTG may mimic TG2 due to the similar mode of action.

82

Since then this topic was further investigated by other research groups who found

83

that MTG is able to deamidate gluten-related peptides which are immunotoxic in CD

84

at least under certain experimental conditions.10,12,13 In contrast, other studies

85

suggest that the use of MTG in bread preparations has no effect on the

86

immunogenicity of gluten, but may even be used to detoxify gluten by covalent

87

incorporation of primary amines.14,15 Despite of this, some research groups

88

postulated the hypothesis that MTG used for production of baked products could lead

89

to an increased incidence in celiac disease in Western countries.16–18 So far, to our

90

knowledge no clinical nor epidemiologic data is available whether there is a

4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 33

Page 5 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

91

relationship between the apparent increase in CD and the use of MTG in baked

92

goods.

93

Commercial use of MTG

94

Since its discovery in 1989, the use of MTG has spread into many different

95

biotechnological applications, most importantly in food processing.19,20 The cross-

96

linking function is used to improve properties of protein containing food like meat,

97

sausage, fish, dairy products, pasta

98

preparation was described using many different flour types, e.g. wheat, rye

99

barley, soybean 24,25, oats 26, and mixtures of wheat and millet.27

21

and bread. The use of MTG in bread

28

22,23

,

100

The use of MTG in bakery products was patented by Röhm GmbH in 1990

101

was marketed by this company (nowadays known as AB Enzymes GmbH) for bakery

102

related applications since approximately the mid 1990’s. First products were just

103

enzyme preparations combining MTG with other enzyme classes. At a later stage a

104

single activity MTG named VERON® TG (a product with 100 TG Units/g) was put on

105

the market and happens to be the subject of this investigation. Since this product (like

106

the majority of bakery enzymes available in the market) is based on a wheat flour

107

carrier it is not suitable for the use in gluten-free bakery products. Therefore only a

108

normal standard wheat bread application was considered for the purpose of this

109

study.

110

Various articles and studies have been published showing the potential technological

111

benefits of MTG in bakery applications.22,23,26,27,29–37 Generally, MTG has a positive

112

effect on loaf volume when used at low concentrations, and at high concentrations

113

the loaf volume is reduced due to formation of a strong meshwork of cross-linked

114

proteins and therefore reduced expansion of gas bubbles.30–32

5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

and

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

115

However, typically MTG is never used as a single enzyme in a given bakery

116

application but always in combination with other technologically required enzyme

117

classes. Due to the limited field of benefits it can be considered a niche enzyme

118

within the group of typical baking enzymes such as amylases, xylanases, lipases,

119

oxidases, hemicellulases, cellulases, proteases, etc. and the global market share in

120

terms of volume and value of MTG used for baking is estimated by industry experts

121

to be lower than 1% of the total baking enzymes market.

122

This low share is a result of its relatively low dosage (VERON® TG is used at 1-3 g /

123

100 kg of flour, corresponding to 1-3 U/kg flour), that is a result of a relatively high

124

cost in use and very specific functionality. Regardless of the low usage volumes MTG

125

is sold and used for bakery applications on all continents without any significant focus

126

countries. MTG is only required for solving explicit technical cases such as industrial

127

bakers using wheat dough with short proofing times, where optimization of dough

128

properties directly after mixing is crucial and MTG can complement the enzymes

129

such as xylanase and amylase that are already used. This is the main reason why

130

only low dosages of MTG (1-3U/kg flour) are required.

131

Countries with traditionally high protein quantity and quality flours (such as derived

132

from e.g. US or Canadian wheat) tend to have lower need for MTG use as compared

133

to countries with predominant medium to poor quality flours, where MTG is used to

134

improve dough elasticity to more closely resemble properties of high protein flour.38

135

Currently in scientific journals as well as in the public, a discussion on a postulated

136

celiac disease triggering effect by MTG takes place – controversial, due to lacking

137

scientific data. Therefore, in order to provide a more solid base to assess this topic,

138

the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of common industrially applied MTG

6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 33

Page 7 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

139

concentrations in wheat bread production on the formation of deamidated gluten

140

epitopes.

141 142 143

Materials and Methods

144

Materials

145

Microbial transglutaminase was applied as formulation VERON® TG (AB Enzymes,

146

Darmstadt, Germany) containing MTG from Ajinomoto (Tokyo, Japan). Deamidated

147

gliadin peptide DGPx2, 26mer gliadin peptide G051, as well as the monoclonal

148

antibodies A011, A054, A064, A067 and A062 were from Zedira (Darmstadt,

149

Germany). Celiac disease patients’ sera (n=26) were anonymized residual samples

150

purchased from in.vent Diagnostica (Hennigsdorf, Germany).

151 152

ELISA

153

Celiac disease patients’ sera were analyzed for the following antibody titers (IgA and

154

IgG) using commercial ELISA test kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions:

155

gliadin (Steffens Biotechnische Analysen, Ebringen, Germany), DGP (Zedira,

156

Darmstadt, Germany).

157 158

Bread preparation

159

Bread was prepared according to an internal recipe by AB Enzymes (Darmstadt,

160

Germany). Each bread contained 550 g wheat flour, 33 mg ascorbic acid, 11 g salt, 7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

161

11 g butter, 11 g sugar, and 27.5 g yeast. Three bread preparations contained

162

different concentrations of VERON® TG (100 U/g): 20, 40, and 80 ppm,

163

corresponding to a total of 2, 4 and 8 U MTG/kg flour. 2 U/kg flour is within the

164

recommended dose range of 1 – 3 U/kg, 4 U/kg and 8 U/kg exceed the upper dose

165

limit by up to 170%. The doughs were mixed in Diosna Spiral mixers type SP12

166

applying standard mixing times of 2 minutes slow speed and 8 minutes fast speed to

167

achieve an optimum dough development. The breads were fermented at 32°C and

168

85% relative humidity for 80 minutes and then baked at 235°C for 35 minutes in

169

unlidded baking tins.

170

As positive control, bread was prepared according to Cabrera-Chávez et al.16 but

171

with 2,000 U MTG/kg flour. For this MTG-concentration preliminary experiments

172

revealed increased immuno-detectable deamidated gliadin peptides.

173 174

Preparation of albumin/globulin, gliadin and glutenin extracts

175

Extraction was essentially performed as previously described.39 Briefly, 0.5 g bread

176

sample were added to 10 mL buffer consisting of 67 mM HKNaPO4, 400 mM NaCl,

177

pH 7.6. Albumins and globulins were extracted at room temperature through vigorous

178

mixing of the sample for 2 min, followed by gentle stirring for further 10 min and

179

subsequent centrifugation at 6,000 x g for 15 min. Extraction of gliadins was

180

performed using 60% ethanol (v/v). Glutenins were extracted at 60°C using 50 mM

181

Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 50% (v/v) 1-propanol, 2 M urea, 1% (w/v) DTE.

182

All extraction steps were performed three times with the same sample and the

183

supernatants from each step were pooled.

184 8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 33

Page 9 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

185 186

Gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting

187

SDS-PAGE was performed according to Laemmli.40 Briefly, samples were mixed with

188

5x SDS-PAGE loading buffer (128 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 10% β-mercaptoethanol,

189

10% glycerol, 4% SDS, 13% bromophenol blue), boiled for 10 min and loaded on a

190

10% SDS-PAGE gel. Separation was performed at 200 V for 40 min. Gels were

191

stained with silver nitrate according to Blum et al.41 Electro-blotting was performed in

192

a Trans Blot SD Semi Dry Transfer Cell (Bio-Rad, Hercules, U.S.A.) at 20 V for 80

193

min. After blotting, the nitrocellulose membranes were presoaked in 48 mM Tris, 39

194

mM glycine, 1.3 mM SDS, 20% (v/v) methanol. Residual binding sites were blocked

195

in 5% skimmed milk powder in TBS-T (10 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% (v/v)

196

Tween 20, pH 8.0) for 60 min at RT. The membrane was washed in TBS-T wash

197

buffer and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with primary antibody/serum

198

(diluted 1,000 fold in TBS-T). After washing for 3 × 5 min in TBS-T, the secondary

199

antibodies (anti-human IgA (Thermo Scientific, Karlsruhe, Germany), anti-human

200

IgG, anti-mouse IgG (both Sigma, Schnelldorf, Germany), each conjugated to

201

alkaline phosphatase and diluted 10,000 fold in TBS-T buffer) were added to the

202

membrane followed by a 1 h incubation at room temperature. After intensive

203

washing, the membrane was placed in detection reagent (100 fold dilution of AP

204

color reagent in color development buffer, BioRad, Hercules, U.S.A.) and incubated

205

for 30 to 60 s at room temperature. Excess detection reagent was drained off and the

206

staining reaction was stopped with 20 mM Tris-HCl, 5 mM EDTA, pH 8.0. All washing

207

steps were performed at room temperature on a shaker.

208

9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 10 of 33

209 210

Dot blots

211

To analyze the specific binding epitopes of the antibodies used in this study, dot blot

212

analysis was performed using unmodified or deamidated γ-gliadin 26mer (aa 59-84;

213

FLQPQQPFPQQPQQPYPQQPQQPFPQ

214

PEQPFPQ

215

LQLQPFPQPQLPYPQPQLPYPQPQLPYPQPQPF

216

PELPYPQPELPY-PQPQPF [33mer DGP], respectively) fused to a carrier protein

217

(Zedira, Darmstadt, Germany). DGPx2 is a recombinant protein composed of both

218

33mer DGP and 26mer DGP fused to a carrier protein. Different amounts (1 and 10

219

µg) of either wheat gliadin (extracted from commercially available standard wheat

220

flour) or recombinant protein were spotted on a nitrocellulose membrane and dried.

221

The membrane was cut into small strips and each of them incubated with an

222

individual antibody (A011, A054, A064, A057, A062). Further steps were identical to

223

the immunoblotting procedure already described.

[26mer

DGP],

and

respectively)

or

FLQPEQPFPEQPEQPYPEQα-gliadin and

10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

33mer

(aa

57-89;

LQLQPFPQPELPYPQ-

Page 11 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

224

Results and Discussion

225

Determination of the specificity of monoclonal antibodies against wheat gliadin

226

The monoclonal antibodies used in this study were evaluated for their specific binding

227

epitope using dot blotting with different antigens containing either unmodified or

228

deamidated immunotoxic CD epitopes, as well as wheat gliadin extracted from wheat

229

flour. Figure 1 shows, that the antibodies strongly differed in their recognition pattern.

230

A011 and A054 showed strong reactivity with wheat gliadin and recombinant

231

unmodified 26mer γ-gliadin. A064 was able to recognize both unmodified and

232

deamidated gliadin independent of the peptide sequence, which indicates that the

233

binding epitope does not cover a deamidation site. Monoclonal antibodies A057 and

234

A062

235

(KLQPFPQPELPYPQPQ).13 Whereas A057 is very specific for the deamidated

236

peptide, A062 detects both unmodified and deamidated 33mer gliadin to a similar

237

extent. Therefore, A057 is one of the most important tools for identifying deamidated

238

33mer gliadin peptide at the moment.

239

Importantly, none of the antibodies showed cross-reactivity with the carrier protein.

were

raised

against

the

same

immunogenic

peptide

240 241

242

Analysis of wheat gluten extracts from MTG-treated breads

243

As expected baked breads prepared with increasing MTG-concentrations (2, 4 and 8

244

U MTG/kg flour) did not show visible differences, while high-dose positive control

245

MTG-bread (2,000 U/kg) was characterized by a small dough volume and reduced air

246

bubble size. Albumin/globulin, gliadin and glutenin extracts from these breads were 11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

247

initially analyzed using SDS-PAGE followed by silver staining and Western blotting

248

with an antibody detecting unmodified gliadin (A011) (Figure 2). Similar protein

249

amounts were extractable for albumin/globulin, gliadin, and glutenin fractions of the

250

control (0), 2, 4 and 8 U MTG/kg flour extracts. Western blot analysis revealed only

251

little gliadin detectable in the albumin/globulin extracts. As expected, more intensive

252

staining was observed for gliadin and glutenin extracts from the samples. The cross

253

reactivity of anti-gliadin antibody A011 (as well as A064 and A054, see Figure 3) to

254

glutelins is in agreement with the observation by Martínez-Esteso et al. for anti-

255

gliadin antibodies used in gluten diagnostics.42

256

However, neither in silver stained gels nor in western blotting, differences in the band

257

pattern between the 0, 2, 4 and 8 U MTG/kg samples were observed. An influence of

258

MTG on the protein composition of the bread samples prepared with increasing

259

amounts of MTG could not be detected. This is in line with earlier data by Bauer et al.

260

who, in a detailed analysis, did observe polymerization and decreased extractability

261

of wheat flour proteins starting with 891 U MTG/kg flour. In contrast, with up to

262

133 U MTG/kg no polymerization was detectable.43 Further the results are in

263

agreement with the observation for bread or pasta prepared with MTG (both about

264

300 U MTG/kg flour).16,39

265

In the positive control extract prepared with the extraordinarily high MTG-

266

concentration of 2,000 U MTG/kg, high molecular weight bands are present

267

predominantly for gliadins and glutenins.

268

Further analysis (Figure 3) of the extracts was performed using additional monoclonal

269

antibodies recognizing unmodified gliadin (A054) or both unmodified and deamidated

270

gliadin peptides (A064) (for specificity, see Figure 1). All samples showed intensive

271

staining with both antibodies. The staining in the albumin/globulin-fraction may be 12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 12 of 33

Page 13 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

272

explained by residual amounts of gliadin. Again, and in agreement with the silver

273

stained gels (Figure 2 A, B, C), an influence of MTG on the protein composition of the

274

extracts prepared with increasing amounts of MTG could not be observed. We

275

already reported analogous results for pasta treated with 300 U MTG/kg.39

276

Taken together, MTG-treatment of wheat dough only results in detectable amounts of

277

high molecular weight proteins, if MTG concentration is extraordinarily high (>300

278

U/kg) which is not the case in standard bakery products.

279 280

Analysis of MTG-treated bread for gliadin deamidation

281

Antibodies raised against deamidated α2-gliadin 33mer epitopes, either specific for

282

the deamidated epitope (A057) or recognizing both unmodified and deamidated

283

33mer (A062) were used to detect possible deamidation of gluten by MTG.13

284

Western blot analysis showed that in the industrially prepared bread samples (0, 2, 4

285

and 8 U MTG/kg flour), basically no staining was observed using deamidation-

286

specific antibody A057 (Figure 4). However, for the 2,000 U MTG/kg controls,

287

staining of multiple bands with a molecular size of 36-40 kDa was observed in every

288

extract. Also the positive control DGPx2 was intensively stained. A062 finally

289

showed, an increase in staining intensity of bands with a molecular size of approx. 37

290

kDa in the albumin/globulin and gliadin extracts for samples with 4 U and 8 U

291

MTG/kg flour. As for the more sensitive antibody A057 (Figure 1) no signal increase

292

was observed, the growing intensity with A062 (the antibody shows some selectivity

293

for the unmodified gliadin, Figure 1) should be due to unmodified gliadin. It can be

294

speculated that MTG-treatment increases accessibility of the (unmodified) epitope.

13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

295

At least using monoclonal antibody A057 specific to deamidated α2-gliadin 33mer

296

neither increase nor presence of any deamidated gliadin could be detected. To

297

further examine this finding, celiac disease patients’ sera were used in Western blot

298

analysis of the bread extracts.

299 300

Analysis of MTG-treated bread using celiac disease patients’ sera

301

In total, 26 celiac disease patients’ sera were characterized for their antibody-titers

302

against unmodified gliadin and deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP). All sera were

303

positive for DGP antibodies (either IgA or IgG) with the exception of two sera (225224

304

and 232559), which were in addition negative for both types of anti-gliadin antibodies.

305

Further, half of the sera were negative for anti-gliadin antibodies (IgA and IgG), 5 of

306

them with a high anti-DGP-titer. The sera were grouped in high (>50 U/mL, Table 1)

307

and low titer anti-DGP (500 U/kg. While we were able to generate deamidated gliadin peptides in

338

high-dose MTG-treated bread (2,000 U/kg) no deamidated gliadin could be detected

339

in bread produced with standard bakery amounts of MTG. In addition, MTG has a

340

more than 10-fold transamidation preference. In the presence of sufficient amounts of

341

primary amine substrates deamidation can be blocked completely.10 Taking these

342

observations together, deamidation probably may take place only at high dose MTG 15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

343

when primary amines are not available in sufficient amounts anymore or already

344

depleted by the MTG-reaction. This is supported by the finding from Mazzeo et al.,

345

who did not detect deamidated gliadin by nano-HPLC-ESI-MS/MS upon addition of

346

even 8,000 U MTG/kg flour in the presence of 20 mM Lysine-ethylester.45

347

To our knowledge so far one example for a food based trigger for celiac disease is

348

described. In the 1980s the Swedish national recommendation to postpone

349

introduction of gluten to 6 months old children resulted in an immediate increase of

350

celiac disease in Sweden. Within 3 years celiac disease incidence almost

351

quadrupled.46 MTG has been introduced in bakery products in the mid-1990s.

352

However, no evidence for an immediate increase in celiac disease incidence at the

353

same time has been reported. Thus, epidemiological data do not support a celiac

354

disease triggering impact by MTG.

355

It is a fact that MTG is able to deamidate gliadin rendering the peptides immunotoxic,

356

as shown by ourselves and other groups. Therefore, it cannot be excluded that MTG

357

treatment of bread has an impact on celiac disease. However, in the light of our

358

results and the published data mentioned above, citing Philippus Theophrastus

359

Aureolus Bombastus von Hohenheim (1493 – 1541) - also known as Paracelsus -

360

seems appropriate: “sola dosis facit venenum – the dose makes the poison”.

361

In summary, standard bakery doses of MTG are magnitudes lower than used in

362

academic examinations. They do not lead to detectable amounts of deamidated

363

gliadin using a deamidated gliadin specific monoclonal antibody and celiac disease

364

patients’ sera in western blotting. Especially no increase in deamidated gliadin was

365

found.

366

16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 16 of 33

Page 17 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

367 368

Abbreviations used:

369

CD, celiac disease; DGP, deamidated gliadin peptide; ELISA, enzyme linked immune

370

sorbent assay; MTG, microbial transglutaminase; DGP, deamidated gliadin peptide;

371

SDS-PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; DTE,

372

dithioerythritol.

373 374 375

Acknowledgement:

376

Preparation of MTG-containing bread by Norman Burkhardt (AB Enzymes) and

377

preparation of graphics by Katrin Bott-Fischer (Zedira) is gratefully acknowledged.

17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

378

References

379

(1)

380 381

Dieterich, W.; Esslinger, B.; Schuppan, D. Pathomechanisms in Celiac Disease. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2003, 132 (2), 98–108.

(2)

Molberg, Ø.; Mcadam, S. N.; Körner, R.; Quarsten, H.; Kristiansen, C.; Madsen, L.; Fugger, L.;

382

Scott, H.; Norén, O.; Roepstorff, P.; et al. Tissue transglutaminase selectively modifies gliadin

383

peptides that are recognized by gut-derived T cells in celiac disease. Nat. Med. 1998, 4 (6),

384

713–717.

385

(3)

Stamnaes, J.; Fleckenstein, B.; Sollid, L. M. The propensity for deamidation and transamidation

386

of peptides by transglutaminase 2 is dependent on substrate affinity and reaction conditions.

387

Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1784 (11), 1804–1811.

388

(4)

389 390

Sollid, L. M. Coeliac disease: dissecting a complex inflammatory disorder. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2002, 2 (9), 647–655.

(5)

Quarsten, H.; Molberg, O.; Fugger, L.; McAdam, S. N.; Sollid, L. M. HLA binding and T cell

391

recognition of a tissue transglutaminase-modified gliadin epitope. Eur. J. Immunol. 1999, 29

392

(8), 2506–2514.

393

(6)

Dieterich, W.; Ehnis, T.; Bauer, M.; Donner, P.; Volta, U.; Riecken, E. O.; Schuppan, D.

394

Identification of tissue transglutaminase as the autoantigen of celiac disease. Nat. Med. 1997,

395

3 (7), 797–801.

396

(7)

Aleanzi, M.; Demonte, A. M.; Esper, C.; Garcilazo, S.; Waggener, M. Celiac disease: antibody

397

recognition against native and selectively deamidated gliadin peptides. Clin. Chem. 2001, 47

398

(11), 2023–2028.

399

(8)

Hill, I. D. What are the sensitivity and specificity of serologic tests for celiac disease? Do

400

sensitivity and specificity vary in different populations? Gastroenterology 2005, 128 (4 SUPPL.

401

1), 25–32. 18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 18 of 33

Page 19 of 33

402

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

(9)

403 404

Schuppan, D.; Junker, Y.; Barisani, D. Celiac Disease: From Pathogenesis to Novel Therapies. Gastroenterology 2009, 137 (6), 1912–1933.

(10)

Heil, A.; Ohsam, J.; Büchold, C.; Pasternack, R.; Yokoyama, K.; Kumazawa, Y.; Hils, M. Microbial

405

transglutaminase has a lower deamidation preference than human tissue transglutaminase on

406

a celiac disease relevant wheat gliadin T-cell epitope. J. Cereal Sci. 2016, 70, 47–56.

407

(11)

408 409

Gerrard, J. A.; Sutton, K. H. Addition of transglutaminase to cereal products may generate the epitope responsible for coeliac disease. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2005, 16 (11), 510–512.

(12)

Dekking, E. H. a.; Van Veelen, P. a.; de Ru, A.; Kooy-Winkelaar, E. M. C.; Gröneveld, T.;

410

Nieuwenhuizen, W. F.; Koning, F. Microbial transglutaminases generate T cell stimulatory

411

epitopes involved in celiac disease. J. Cereal Sci. 2008, 47 (2), 339–346.

412

(13)

Skovbjerg, H.; Koch, C.; Anthonsen, D.; Sjöström, H. Deamidation and cross-linking of gliadin

413

peptides by transglutaminases and the relation to celiac disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004,

414

1690 (3), 220–230.

415

(14)

Gianfrani, C.; Siciliano, R. A.; Facchiano, A. M.; Camarca, A.; Mazzeo, M. F.; Costantini, S.;

416

Salvati, V. M.; Maurano, F.; Mazzarella, G.; Iaquinto, G.; et al. Transamidation of wheat flour

417

inhibits the response to gliadin of intestinal T cells in celiac disease. Gastroenterology 2007,

418

133 (3), 780–789.

419

(15)

Lombardi, E.; Bergamo, P.; Maurano, F.; Bozzella, G.; Luongo, D.; Mazzarella, G.; Rotondi

420

Aufiero, V.; Iaquinto, G.; Rossi, M. Selective inhibition of the gliadin-specific, cell-mediated

421

immune response by transamidation with microbial transglutaminase. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2013, 93

422

(4), 479–488.

423

(16)

Cabrera-Chávez, F.; Rouzaud-Sández, O.; Sotelo-Cruz, N.; Calderón de la Barca, A. M.

424

Transglutaminase treatment of wheat and maize prolamins of bread increases the serum IgA

425

reactivity of celiac disease patients. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56 (4), 1387–1391. 19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

426

(17)

427 428

Lerner, A.; Matthias, T. Possible association between celiac disease and bacterial transglutaminase in food processing: a hypothesis. Nutr. Rev. 2015, 73 (8), 544–552.

(18)

Matthias, T.; Jeremias, P.; Neidhöfer, S.; Lerner, A. The industrial food additive, microbial

429

transglutaminase, mimics tissue transglutaminase and is immunogenic in celiac disease

430

patients. Autoimmun. Rev. 2016, 15 (12), 1111–1119.

431

(19)

432 433

A review. Folia Microbiol. (Praha). 2014, 59 (3), 241–250. (20)

434 435

Yokoyama, K.; Nio, N.; Kikuchi, Y. Properties and applications of microbial transglutaminase. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 64 (4), 447–454.

(21)

436 437

Kieliszek, M.; Misiewicz, A. Microbial transglutaminase and its application in the food industry.

Aalami, M.; Leelavathi, K. Effect of Microbial Transglutaminase on Spaghetti Quality. J. Food Sci. 2008, 73 (5), C306–C312.

(22)

Grossmann, I.; Döring, C.; Jekle, M.; Becker, T.; Koehler, P. Compositional Changes and Baking

438

Performance of Rye Dough As Affected by Microbial Transglutaminase and Xylanase. J. Agric.

439

Food Chem. 2016, 64 (28), 5751–5758.

440

(23)

441 442

performance of rye dough as affected by transglutaminase. J. Cereal Sci. 2011, 54 (1), 29–36. (24)

443 444

Ribotta, P. D.; Pérez, G. T.; Añón, M. C.; León, A. E. Optimization of Additive Combination for Improved Soy–Wheat Bread Quality. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2010, 3 (3), 395–405.

(25)

445 446

Beck, M.; Jekle, M.; Selmair, P. L.; Koehler, P.; Becker, T. Rheological properties and baking

Basman, A.; Koksel, H.; Ng, P. K. W. Effects of Transglutaminase on SDS-PAGE Patterns of Wheat, Soy, and Barley Proteins and their Blends. J. Food Sci. 2002, 67 (7), 2654–2658.

(26)

Huang, W.; Li, L.; Wang, F.; Wan, J.; Tilley, M.; Ren, C.; Wu, S. Effects of transglutaminase on

447

the rheological and Mixolab thermomechanical characteristics of oat dough. Food Chem.

448

2010, 121 (4), 934–939.

20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 20 of 33

Page 21 of 33

449

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

(27)

Schoenlechner, R.; Szatmari, M.; Bagdi, A.; Tömösközi, S. Optimisation of bread quality

450

produced from wheat and proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) by adding emulsifiers,

451

transglutaminase and xylanase. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 51 (1), 361–366.

452

(28)

Gottmann, K.; Sproessler, B. Bakery products and intermediates. EP0492406, B1, 1994.

453

(29)

Gerrard, J. A.; Fayle, S. E.; Brown, P. A.; Sutton, K. H.; Simmons, L.; Rasiah, I. Effects of

454

Microbial Transglutaminase on the Wheat Proteins of Bread and Croissant Dough. J. Food Sci.

455

2001, 66 (6), 782–786.

456

(30)

Basman, A.; Köksel, H.; Ng, P. Effects of increasing levels of transglutaminase on the

457

rheological properties and bread quality characteristics of two wheat flours. Eur. Food Res.

458

Technol. 2002, 215 (5), 419–424.

459

(31)

Steffolani, M. E.; Ribotta, P. D.; Pérez, G. T.; León, A. E. Effect of glucose oxidase,

460

transglutaminase, and pentosanase on wheat proteins: Relationship with dough properties

461

and bread-making quality. J. Cereal Sci. 2010, 51 (3), 366–373.

462

(32)

463 464

Caballero, P. A.; Gómez, M.; Rosell, C. M. Improvement of dough rheology, bread quality and bread shelf-life by enzymes combination. J. Food Eng. 2007, 81 (1), 42–53.

(33)

Basman, A.; Koksel, H.; Ng, P. K. W. Utilization of Transglutaminase to Increase the Level of

465

Barley and Soy Flour Incorporation in Wheat Flour Breads. J. Food Sci. 2003, 68 (8), 2453–

466

2460.

467

(34)

Ahn, H. J.; Kim, J. H.; Ng, P. K. W. Functional and Thermal Properties of Wheat, Barley, and Soy

468

Flours and Their Blends Treated with a Microbial Transglutaminase. J. Food Sci. 2005, 70 (6),

469

c380–c386.

470

(35)

471 472

Yildiz, Ö.; Dogan, I. S. Optimization of Gluten-Free Cake Prepared from Chestnut Flour and Transglutaminase: Response Surface Methodology Approach. Int. J. Food Eng. 2014, 10 (4).

(36)

Huang, W. N.; Yuan, Y. L.; Kim, Y. S.; Chung, O. K. Effects of Transglutaminase on Rheology, 21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

473

Microstructure, and Baking Properties of Frozen Dough. Cereal Chem. J. 2008, 85 (3), 301–

474

306.

475

(37)

476 477

Koh, B.-K.; Ng, P. K. W. Effects of Ferulic Acid and Transglutaminase on Hard Wheat Flour Dough and Bread. Cereal Chem. J. 2009, 86 (1), 18–22.

(38)

Li, Z.; Tang, X.; Huang, W.; Liu, J. G.; Tilley, M.; Yao, Y. Rheology, Microstructure, and Baking

478

Characteristics of Frozen Dough Containing Rhizopus chinensis Lipase and Transglutaminase.

479

Cereal Chem. J. 2011, 88 (6), 596–601.

480

(39)

Ruh, T.; Ohsam, J.; Pasternack, R.; Yokoyama, K.; Kumazawa, Y.; Hils, M. Microbial

481

Transglutaminase Treatment in Pasta-Production Does Not Affect the Immunoreactivity of

482

Gliadin with Celiac Disease Patients’ Sera. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62 (30), 7604–7611.

483

(40)

Cleveland, D. W.; Fischer, S. G.; Kirschner, M. W.; Laemmli, U. K. Peptide mapping by limited

484

proteolysis in sodium dodecyl sulfate and analysis by gel electrophoresis. J. Biol. Chem. 1977,

485

252 (3), 1102–1106.

486

(41)

487 488

Blum, H.; Beier, H.; Gross, H. J. Improved silver staining of plant proteins, RNA and DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Electrophoresis 1987, 8 (2), 93–99.

(42)

Martínez-Esteso, M. J.; Brohée, M.; Nørgaard, J.; O’Connor, G. Label-Free Proteomic Analysis

489

of Wheat Gluten Proteins and Their Immunoreactivity to ELISA Antibodies. Cereal Chem. J.

490

2017, CCHEM-11-16-026.

491

(43)

Bauer, N.; Koehler, P.; Wieser, H.; Schieberle, P. Studies on Effects of Microbial

492

Transglutaminase on Gluten Proteins of Wheat. I. Biochemical Analysis. Cereal Chem. J. 2003,

493

80 (6), 781–786.

494

(44)

Heredia-Sandoval, N. G.; Islas-Rubio, A. R.; Cabrera-Chávez, F.; Calderón de la Barca, A. M.

495

Transamidation of gluten proteins during the bread-making process of wheat flour to produce

496

breads with less immunoreactive gluten. Food Funct. 2014, 5 (8), 1813. 22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 22 of 33

Page 23 of 33

497

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

(45)

Mazzeo, M. F.; Bonavita, R.; Maurano, F.; Bergamo, P.; Siciliano, R. A.; Rossi, M. Biochemical

498

modifications of gliadins induced by microbial transglutaminase on wheat flour. Biochim.

499

Biophys. Acta 2013, 1830 (11), 5166–5174.

500

(46)

Ivarsson, A.; Persson, L. A.; Nyström, L.; Ascher, H.; Cavell, B.; Danielsson, L.; Dannaeus, A.;

501

Lindberg, T.; Lindquist, B.; Stenhammar, L.; et al. Epidemic of coeliac disease in Swedish

502

children. Acta Paediatr. 2000, 89 (2), 165–171.

503

23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

504

Figure captions

505 506

Figure 1. Specificity of monoclonal antibodies used for the analysis of MTG-treated

507

bread. Recombinant proteins carrying different unmodified and deamidated

508

immunotoxic peptide sequences isolated from wheat gliadin were analyzed using dot

509

blot to identify specific binding patterns of the antibodies.

510 511

Figure 2. SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis of wheat protein fractions extracted

512

from bread prepared without (0), 2, 4 and 8 U MTG/kg flour. A, B, C: silver-stained

513

gels; D, E, F: Western blots using monoclonal antibody A011 specific to gliadin as

514

detection antibody. Gliadin extract from 2,000 U MTG/kg flour and DGPx2 were

515

deamidated gliadin positive controls.

516 517

Figure 3. Western blot analysis of MTG treated bread extracts using antibodies

518

against unmodified gliadin. Protein extracts as described in figure 2. A, B, C: Western

519

blots with gliadin specific antibody A054; D, E, F: Western blots with gliadin specific

520

antibody A064. DGPx2: deamidated gliadin control. 26mer GP: non-deamidated

521

gliadin control (the multiple bands visible in the blots are essentially due to multimers

522

or degradation products of recombinant 26mer GP visible at high concentrations in

523

combination with sensitive detection).

524 525

Figure 4. Western blot analysis of extracts from MTG treated bread samples using

526

antibodies against deamidated gliadin. Protein extracts as described in figure 2. A, B, 24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 24 of 33

Page 25 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

527

C: Western blots with gliadin specific antibody A057; D, E, F: Western blots with

528

gliadin specific antibody A062. DGPx2: deamidated gliadin control.

529 530

Figure 5. Western blot analysis of MTG treated bread samples using high titer celiac

531

disease patients’ sera. Protein extracts as described in figure 2. A, B, C: Western

532

blots with high titer sera pool of IgG type; D, E, F: Western blots with high titer sera

533

pool of IgA type. DGPx2: deamidated gliadin control. 26mer GP: non-deamidated

534

gliadin control.

535 536

Figure 6. Western blot analysis of MTG treated bread samples using low titer celiac

537

disease patients’ sera. Protein extracts as described in figure 2. A, B, C: Western

538

blots with low titer sera pool of IgG type; D, E, F: Western blots with low titer sera

539

pool of IgA type. DGPx2: deamidated gliadin control. 26mer GP: non-deamidated

540

gliadin control.

25 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 26 of 33

Tables Table 1: Celiac disease patients’ sera with high titers of anti-DGP and anti-gliadin antibodies (IgA and IgG; c/o = cut off).

Serum No. 221096 223261 224184 224187 224234 225254 225380 225833 225872 227542 232554 240820 240993 232394

High titer sera, either IgA or IgG > 50 U/mL (n = 14) DGPx1 IgA DGPx1 IgG Gliadin IgA c/o = 8 c/o = 7 c/o = 14 31 65 8 100 33 >100 96 99 68 6 50 20 70 12 >100 23 >100 4 100 3 41 >100 24 100 0 >100 >100 40 27 >100 11 >100 87 >100 >100 >100 55 27 60 16

Gliadin IgG c/o = 14 7 4 9 3 3 80 16 >100 8 14 2 12 10 2

Table 2: Celiac disease patients’ sera with low titers of anti-DGP and anti-gliadin antibodies (IgA and IgG; c/o = cut off), respectively.

Serum No. 221057 223253 223260 223333 224360 225224 225292 225387 232553 232559 225938 223332

Low titer sera, IgA and IgG < 50 U/mL (n = 12) DGPx1 IgA DGPx1 IgG Gliadin IgA c/o = 8 c/o = 7 c/o = 14 33