Miniaturized Thermal-Assisted Purge-and-Trap Technique Coupling

Aug 10, 2017 - It still remains a great challenge for quantification of trace analytes in complex samples by surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) ...
0 downloads 12 Views 2MB Size
Subscriber access provided by University of Rochester | River Campus & Miner Libraries

Article

Miniaturized thermal-assisted purge-and-trap technique coupling with surface-enhanced Raman scattering for trace analysis of complex samples Zhengyi Chen, Gongke Li, and Zhuomin Zhang Anal. Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02912 • Publication Date (Web): 10 Aug 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on August 11, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Analytical Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 26

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Analytical Chemistry

1 2 3

Miniaturized

thermal-assisted

purge-and-trap

technique

4

coupling with surface-enhanced Raman scattering for trace

5

analysis of complex samples

6 7 8

Zhengyi Chen, Gongke Li*, Zhuomin Zhang*

9 10

School of Chemistry, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

11 12 13 14

* Corresponding authors: Gongke Li, Zhuomin Zhang

15

Tel.: +86-20-84110922

16

Fax.: +86-20-84115107

17

E. mail : [email protected] (Gongke Li)

18

[email protected] (Zhuomin Zhang)

19

1 `

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Analytical Chemistry

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

20

ABSTRACT

21

It still remains a great challenge for quantification of trace analytes in complex

22

samples by surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) technique due to potential matrix

23

influence or weak SERS responses of analytes. In this work, a miniaturized thermal-

24

assisted purge-and-trap (MTAPT) device was designed and developed to eliminate matrix

25

influence coupled with derivatization method before SERS analysis. The design of

26

MTAPT chamber was optimized based on quantitative calculation of its dead volume by

27

computational fluid dynamics simulation. The small straight chamber was selected as an

28

optimized design with a recovery of 96.1% for formaldehyde. The practical feasibility of

29

MTAPT was validated based on four real analytical applications including phenthiol in

30

industrial water, formaldehyde in flour, sulfion in waste water and methanol in industrial

31

alcohol. The results showed that SERS responses of all analytes dramatically increased

32

by eliminating sample matrices after MTAPT process. Phenthiol, formaldehyde, sulfion

33

and methanol in real samples could be accurately quantified with recoveries of 80.9%-

34

110.0%, and the analytical results were validated by corresponding standard methods.

35

The time consumption of MTAPT-SERS for real sample analysis including sample

36

preparation and determination was within 16 min. It is highly expected that the

37

combination of MTAPT technique with portable SERS instrument can greatly expand the

38

range of SERS analysis. The proposed MTAPT-SERS method has high potential for on-

39

site analysis of complex samples.

40 41

Keywords: Miniaturized thermal-assisted, Purge-and-trap, SERS, Trace analysis,

42

Complex sample.

2 `

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 26

Page 3 of 26

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

43

Analytical Chemistry

Introduction

44

In recent years, SERS technique for rapid and on-site analysis of real samples has

45

aroused great attention1-3, because it can provide more delicate information of target

46

molecular fingerprints with potential single-molecule level of sensitivity4,

47

analysis techniques. However, SERS analysis becomes impractical when being applied in

48

complex samples, since SERS amplification of Raman signals highly depends on noble

49

metal nanoparticles such as Au, Ag or their composites, which are susceptible to the

50

matrix of real samples and finally influence the accuracy of SERS analysis6-8. To achieve

51

accurate analysis of real samples by SERS, it is crucial to eliminate sample matrices via

52

efficient sample preparation

53

attaching on the surface of SERS substrates to generate severe interference signals12.

9-11

5

than other

in order to avoid large amounts of matrix molecules

54

Recently, many efforts have gone to reduce matrix interference and enrich target

55

analytes during SERS analysis of real samples by coupling of traditional sample

56

preparation or separation methods such as liquid-liquid extraction13, solid-phase (micro-)

57

extraction SP(M)E10, magnetic extraction3, headspace microextraction14 or HPLC15, thin

58

layer chromatography9, capillary electrophoresis16 and ion-pair chromatography (IC)17 .

59

Most of these sample preparation methods are based on liquid-liquid or solid-liquid

60

extraction-separation process and usually require large amounts of organic solvent and

61

sample solutions with long proceeding time, which usually results in potential

62

interference to targets and relatively low extraction efficiency. The ideal sample

63

preparation technique coupling to rapid SERS analysis should efficiently eliminate the

64

complex sample matrices using few organic solvents with short proceeding time and

65

portable instrument scale18. Sample preparation technique, based on liquid-gas or solid-

3 `

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Analytical Chemistry

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

66

gas extraction-separation process, such as purge-and-trap (P&T) and SPME, would be

67

potentially suitable for rapid SERS analysis because they avoid using large volumes of

68

organic solvent19 and any further clean-up post-treatment20. Thus, it is expected that the

69

development of liquid-gas or solid-gas sample preparation methods would benefit the

70

enhancement of analytical selectivity and accuracy by SERS. Chen et al.17 developed a

71

thin-film headspace microextraction for SERS analysis of trace sulfur dioxide in wine

72

samples. This method utilized headspace microextraction process to achieve the efficient

73

separation of target volatile SO2 and matrix remaining in the sample solution, which

74

resulted in the selective enrichment of SO2 and great enhancement of SRES response

75

simultaneously. However, up to now there are few works focusing on the development of

76

efficient and portable sample preparation technique coupling with rapid SERS analysis

77

for complex samples 11. Moreover, most sample preparation methods coupled with SERS

78

were designed for specific volatile compounds within a limited range. Few works are

79

devoted to the combination of portable but efficient sample preparation techniques with

80

SERS ananlysis for real sample analysis.

81

P&T technique is a traditional liquid-gas separation technique with the great

82

potential to a suitable sample preparation technique for rapid SERS analysis because

83

P&T can efficiently separate the trace analytes from complex sample matrices and has

84

been widely applied for the enrichment and analysis of voltile targets from various

85

samples20. However, most of commercial P&T devices are adapted to the large-scale

86

analytical instruments such as gas chromatography (GC) and GC-mass spectrometry

87

(GC-MS). Generally, P&T device includes a sample vessel, a thermal-assisted desorption

88

unit and a trapping unit19. Conventional sample vessels are frit purge tubes or common

4 `

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 26

Page 5 of 26

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Analytical Chemistry

89

frit bottle21. Common thermal-assisted desorption unit and trapping unit is based on the

90

manifold heater22 and Tenax-GC trap23, respectively. Thus, commercial P&T devices are

91

so bulky that they are not suitable for rapid on-site SERS analysis. To overcome these

92

problems, a miniaturized thermal-assisted purge-and-trap (MTAPT) device is developed

93

in this work. The main challenge is how to realize the miniaturization of separation

94

system in MTAPT but remain its high transferring efficiency at the same time. On one

95

hand, it is crucial to design and develop the efficient micro-heater with battery-voltage for

96

MTAPT. Recently, as an important unit, micro-heater using battery-voltage can heat to

97

300℃ within a short time and has been applied for volatiles monitoring24 or sample

98

preparation25 due to its high heating efficiency. An MTAPT device with high heating

99

efficiency was designed by using low voltage of micro heater in our work. On the other

100

hand, in order to remain high transferring efficiency, it is essential to quantitatively

101

investigate the dead volume in the chamber for the optimization of MTAPT design.

102

However, until now there are no studies focusing on the investigation of the quantitative

103

method for dead volume. Simulation strategies such as computational fluid dynamics

104

(CFD) analysis are ideal methods for quantitative calculation of many physical

105

parameters of the gas in a specific region26, such as pressure and velocity. Benefit from

106

the velocity distribution function of CFD, the dead volume, which is minimal magnitude

107

of velocity, could be vividly present during the design of the chamber’s geometry of

108

MTAPT. Compared with the traditional P&T device, MTAPT presents not only

109

portability but also various functions due to its superior liquid-gas transformation

110

performance and efficient heating rate.

111

The targets after treatment with MTAPT are volatile and most of them possess weak

5 `

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Analytical Chemistry

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 6 of 26

112

SERS response due to their small Raman cross sections. However, SERS is usually

113

suitable for analysis of targets containing highly polarizable aromatic groups6, which are

114

large Raman cross sections and yield the strong SERS response

115

SERS analysis, derivatization is an efficient strategy to enhance Raman cross section by

116

modification of polarizable aromatic groups28,

117

derivatization strategy is limited to those chemical active volatile compounds, such as

118

hydrazine6, formaldehyde7, 30, 31 and acetone8. Therefore, for some chemically inert or

119

non-volatile compounds, derivatization strategy for SERS activated becomes unavailable.

120

MTAPT is a good way to solve this problem, since it can transfer some non-volatile

121

compounds to volatile or chemically active targets.

29

27

. To realize MTAPT-

. However, the applicability of

122

In this work, an MTAPT device with high heating efficiency was designed

123

containing a micro-heater and specific heating chamber. The miniaturization process was

124

optimized in detail based on the CFD simulation. And then four application strategies of

125

MTAPT were developed based on various targets with sharply different properties

126

including strong SERS response, easily SERS activated and volatile, non-volatile and

127

difficultly SERS activated compounds. The application of MTAPT-SERS was illustrated

128

by four targets including phenthiol, formaldehyde, sulfion, and methanol. MTAPT-SERS

129

technique was actually applied for the rapid analysis of these four trace targets in real

130

complex samples.

131

Experimental

132

Chemicals. 3-Methyl-2-benzothiazolinone hydrazone hydrochloride monohydrate (98%),

133

N,N-dimethyl-p-phenylenediamine

134

dinitrophenylhydrazine (98%), trifluoroacetic acid (99.5%, TFA) and acetaldehyde

sodium

sulfide

nonahydrate

6 `

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

(99.99%),

4-

Page 7 of 26

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Analytical Chemistry

135

(99.5%) were purchased from Aladdin Chemistry Co. Ltd (Shanghai, China).

136

NH4Fe(SO4)2·12H2O was obtained from Tianjin Chemical Reagent Plant (Tianjin, China).

137

Au/SiO2 colloids (2.94×10-4 mol/L) having pinholes consisting of Au NP cores with a

138

diameter of 55 nm around and silica shell thickness of 1-2 nm and Au colloids were

139

supplied by the groups of Prof. Tian in Xiamen University (Xiamen, China)32.

140

Instruments. A portable DeltaNu (Laramie, WY) battery-powered Raman spectrometer

141

(model Inspector Raman, diode laser excitation wavelength λex=785 nm) with a liquid-

142

N2-cooled CCD detector (Model Spec-10:400B, Roper Scientic, Trenton, NJ) was used

143

for SERS analysis. The LTQ-Orbitrap (Thermo-Fisher, San Jose, CA, USA) was used for

144

identifying the target analyte and by-product during derivazation. All chromatographic

145

analyses for comparison study were performed by a Shimadzu LC-20AB (Shimadzu,

146

Japan) which consisted of binary pumps (LC-20AT), an injection valve (Rheodyne model

147

7725i) equipped with a 20 µL injection loop, a UV-Vis wavelength detector, a system

148

controller (SPD-20A) and an acquisition data software of LC-Solution. Chromatographic

149

separation was carried out on a Diamonsil C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 µm

150

particle size) from Dikma (Beijing, China), and a 10 mm ×4.6 mm i.d. C18 security guard

151

column from Elite (Dalian, China). Current source (ZHAOXIN KXN-3002D DC, China)

152

was purchased from local market which could precisely mediate the voltage from 0.0-

153

36.0 V.

154

Development of MTAPT technique. The MTAPT system mainly included four parts: a

155

carrier gas pump, a vapour chamber, a heating vessel and an adoptor (Scheme 1). The

156

carrier gas was pumped by a commercial mini-aquarium pump or mini-N2 cylinder. The

157

vapour chamber was consisted of a sample injection pore for injecting sample and a

7 `

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Analytical Chemistry

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

158

heater entrance pore for loading vessel. Silicone gasket was plugged in the sample

159

injection pore and the heater entrance pore for preventing the leakage of volatile targets.

160

A pore on the adoptor was used for gas venting. The heating vessel was well designed

161

because it played an important part during the miniaturization. Considering its portability,

162

a commercial metal ceramics heater with the size of 1.0 cm × 1.0 cm was employed to

163

miniaturize the vapour chamber in MTAPT as much as possible. Considering heating

164

efficiency and safety, the resistance and the max voltage of micro-heater was set at 3.0 Ω

165

and 17 V, respectively. The micro-heater could heat to 120℃ at 6.0 V simply by use of

166

several batteries. The vessel was made of anodic aluminum oxide owing to its much

167

higher resistance to corrosion and chemical inertness than the other common metals such

168

as copper and iron.

169

Computational fluid dynamics analysis of chamber geometry. The effect of the

170

chamber geometry on fluid flow conditions and further sampling efficiency were

171

investigated by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis. Four different chambers

172

consisting of one sample inlet, gas inlet and outlet were designed for obtaining optimal

173

chamber geometry. The dimensions of these four chambers were illustrated in Figure S1.

174

The Navier–Stokes equation was established for the calculation using a commercial

175

software package of ANSYS 14.0/fluent CFD. The modelling was made based on three-

176

dimensional steady and incompressible flow. The modelled fluid was air with the density

177

of 1.29 kg/m3 and the realizable k-є model (RKE) was used for turbulence model.

178

Application strategies of MTAPT-SERS for real sample analysis. MTAPT-SERS

179

strategies were developed and applied for analysis of four selected targets including

180

phenthiol, formaldehyde, sulfion and methanol in corresponding complex samples in

8 `

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 26

Page 9 of 26

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Analytical Chemistry

181

order to validate the feasibility of the method. The corresponding strategy was present in

182

Scheme 1S. The specific sample preparation and analysis protocols were presented in the

183

experimental section of “Supplementary Material”. After being treated by MTAPT, 200

184

µL of sample solutions were mixed with 100 µL of corresponding SERS substrate

185

followed by SERS detection in the specific acquisition integration time and power. SERS

186

acquisition integration time for detection of phenthiol, formaldehyde, sulfion and menthol

187

was 5s, 1 s, 1 s and 3 s, respectively. SERS powers for detection of phenthiol,

188

formaldehyde, sulfion and menthol were set at high power, medium high power, high

189

power and high power.

190

Results and discussion

191

The Design of MTAPT Device. The presence of dead volumes would make the

192

components remain in the sampling chamber, especially in gas recirculation

193

illustrate the effect of the miniaturization of chamber on dead volume, CFD simulation

194

was carried out for four different kinds of vapour chambers which were circuitous (Type

195

a, Figure S1a), straight but big (Type b, Figure S1 b), straight with long heater vessel

196

entrance (Type c, Figure S1c) and small with short heater vessel entrance (Type d,

197

Figure S1d) respectively. The resulting velocity vectors (Figure 1) showed the gas

198

recirculation regions that occurred in the chambers but varied with different dead

199

volumes. Especially, it was clearly seen there was gas recirculation region in the inlet of

200

circuitous chamber (Figure 1a) in comparison with other straight chambers (Figure 1b-d).

201

For further study, the velocity magnitude distribution of these four chambers was

202

quantitatively counted based on their CFD simulations data, and their volumes were

203

precisely calculated based on their geometry. Dead volume was quantified by the peak

9 `

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

3233

. To

Analytical Chemistry

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 10 of 26

204

value (vp) and the distribution percent of velocity magnitude below 0.005 m/s (v