Mixed micelles of dioctanoyl-L-.alpha.-lecithin and hydrocarbon

Mixed micelles of dioctanoyl-L-.alpha.-lecithin and hydrocarbon amphiphiles. Aspects of fluidization of the micellar interior. Roel J. E. M. De Weerd,...
0 downloads 0 Views 796KB Size
2528

J. Phys. Chem. 1982, 86,2528-2533

CTAB/TTAB mixed micelles, studied by Lindman et al.,lS correspond nicely with those of the 1:l mixed micelles of decanoate and dodecanoate of this study. In retrospect, the CTAB/TTAB mixed micelles form a special case of the more general situation as presented.

Acknowledgment. This investigation has been supported by the Netherlands Foundation for Chemical Research (SON) with financial aid from the Netherlands Organization for the Advancement of Pure Research (ZWO).

Mixed Micelles of Dioctanoyl-L-a-lecithin and Hydrocarbon Amphiphiles. Aspects of Fluidization of the Micellar Interior Roe1 J. E. M. de Weerd,* Jan W. de Haan, Leo J. M. van de Ven, and Henk M. Buck Laboratories of Instrumental Analysis and Organic Chemistry, University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands (Received: September 15, 1981; I n Final Form: January 12, 1982)

13CNMR measurements of dioctanoyl-L-a-lecithin micellar solutions detect an almost complete visibility of the intrinsic magnetic nonequivalent behavior of the two lipid acyl chains. This is an extension of recently published observations. According to the latter, the chemical shift data are interpreted in terms of effectively different lengths of the sn-1 and sn-2 acyl chains due to a bending near the C2 carbon atom of the sn-2 chain. Mixed micellar systems of DOPC and several n-alkyltrimethylammonium bromides show a difference in effective chain lengths of the constituent detergent types. 13CNMR shieldings are observed for n-alkyl detergent fragments which are longer than both acyl chains of the lipid molecules. A t an effective chain length difference of seven carbon atoms a sizeable contribution of extra gauche conformers with respect to their single micelles occur for these n-alkyl surfactants. For smaller differences decreasing van der Waals interactions (i.e., decreasing molecular packing) participate almost exclusively leading to chain separation. The deshieldings observed for the n-alkyl segments situated directly between neighboring lecithin chains indicate conformational changes toward more extended forms, as compared with their single micellar solutions, rather than increasing van der Waals interactions. The lipid molecules do not undergo measurable conformational changes upon mixed micelle formation but are only subject to increased molecular packing. This may indicate that conformational changes are of minor importance for solubilizing micelle bound hydrocarbon-like compounds.

Introduction The importance of micelle-forming phospholipids in biological membranes has often been stated, for example, as carriers for membrane bound enzymes1,2or trans-membrane transport-enhancing constituents within a bilayer membrane or particles stimulating cell division.* Conformational and motional behavior of head groups and acyl tails and perhaps also intermolecularly correlated molecular ordering3 may well be of great interest for these important regulations. Efforts have been made in the elucidation of the conformational structures of micelles of short-chain lecithins by means of different spectroscopic methods. By 'H NMR the intrinsic nonequivalence of the sn-1 and sn-2 acyl chains of dioctanoylphosphatidylcholine and dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine is v i ~ i b l e . ~In total, four separate a protons were observed; the remaining proton signals either overlapped or were not assigned. The explanation was given in terms of different conformational (1)C.Baron and T. E. Thompson, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 382,276 (1975). (2)B.de Kruijff, A. J. Verkley, C. J. A. van Echtveld, W. J. Gerritsen, C. Mambers, P. C. Noordam, and J. de Gier, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 555, 200 (1979);P.R. Cullis and B. de Kruijff, ibid., 559, 399 (1979). (3)M. Barbe and D. Patterson, J. Phys. Chem., 82, 40 (1978);P. Lemaire and P. Bothorel, Macromolecules, 13,311 (1980),and references therein. (4) M. F. Roberts, A. A. Bothner-By, and E. A. Dennis, Biochemistry, 17, 935 (1978). (5) R. A. Burns and M. F. Roberts, Biochemistry, 19, 3100 (1980).

behaviors of both chains, as suggested earlier by Seelig et ale6who studied the gel phase and liquid crystalline phase

of dipalmitoylphosphatidylethanolamine and dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine. In this picture, the sn-1 and sn-2 chains run parallel to each other except for bending of the sn-2 chain near the C-2 carbon atom. This results in different effective chain lengths.6 Recently, also 13C NMR spectra were published for dibutyryl-, dihexanoyl-, diheptanoyl-, and dioctanoylpho~phatidylcholine.~ Again, the intrinsic nonequivalent chains resulted in partially resolved spectra. In the present study 13CNMR spectra with considerably better resolution will be presented; for all but two carbons separate signals were observed and assigned to the sn-1 and sn-2 chains. It will be shown that micelles of dioctanoyl-L-a-lecithin (DOPC) resemble mixed micelles of n-alkyl detergents bearing chains of nonequivalent lengths. Increasing the effective chain length difference upon elongation of the sn-1 chain causes fluidization near the apolar middle region of the bilayer. Keough et al.7 described this fluidization in terms of intermolecular ordering. Stumpel et a1.8 supposed intramolecular contributions like disordering conformational changes. However, van der Waals attractive interactions either were ignoreds (6)J. Seelig, Biochem. Soc. Trans.,6,40(1978),and references therein, J. Seelig and A. Seelig, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 406,l (1975);G. Buldt and J. Seelig, Biochemistry, 19, 6170 (1980). (7)K. M. W.Keough and P. J. Davis, Biochemistry, 18,1453(1979). (8) J. Stumpel, A. Nicksch, and H. Eibl, Biochemistry, 20,662 (1981).

0022-3654/82/2086-2528$01.25/00 1982 American Chemical Society

The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Vol. 86, No. 13, 1982 2529

Fluidization of the Micellar Interior

TABLE I: 13CNMR Chemical Shifts of the Micelle Solutions ( 5 0 mM) Relative t o Me,Sia DOPC carbon no. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

sn-1

sn-2

C,TAB

C,,TAB

C ,,TAB

C ,,TAB

C,,TAB

34.43 25.18 29.45 29.35b 32.12 22.89 14.08

34.52 25.31 29.51 29.41b 32.12 22.94 14.13

22.40 25.93 28.55 28.55 31.41 22.71 13.87

23.08 26.38 29.20 29.57 29.71b 29.84b 29.84b 29.51 32.11 22.84 14.17

23.26 26.59 29.52

23.32 26.66 29.62

23.38 26.72 29.72

9 10

11 12 13 14 15 16 17

30.14 29.79 32.32 22.99 14.25

30.38 30.22 29.87 32.38 23.03 14.26

18 C,D, at 128 ppm downfield from Me,% in T,values.

30.25 29.96 32.44 23.08 14.29

Resonances could not be assigned properly because of little or no differences

or were presumed to be c o n ~ t a n t .In ~ our opinion, the latter have to contribute. On the contrary, the extent to which intermolecular van der Waals attractions on the one hand and intramolecular conformational changes on the other hand cause fluidization should be a function of the effective chain length difference. Recently, a method has been developed for interpreting 13C NMR spectra of mixed micelles of different alkano ate^.^ This was performed in terms of conformational equilibria changes with respect to the single micelles on the one hand and growing interchain distances on the other hand. I t allowed us to distinguish these two factors to a certain extent. We also mentioned the possible influence of solvent effects on the spectra. Our previously developed model will be applied to mixed micelles of DOPC and several trimethylammonium bromides. It will describe the connection between van der Waals interactions, conformational changes, and the effective chain length difference (vide supra) with respect to the fluidization process. Also larger interchain distances due to van der Waals interact i o n ~only ~ are once more considered. Experimental Section The n-alkyltrimethylammonium bromides were prepared by the reaction of trimethylamine with the n-alkyl bromides in alcoholic solution according to literature data.1° Dioctanoyl-L-a-lecithin was purchased from Supelco, Inc. A lipid stock solution was prepared by removal of the organic storage solvent under a stream of nitrogen and by solubilization in chloroform. This stock solution was stored a t -20 "C. Mixed micelle solutions were obtained by adding the appropriate amounts of deionized water to the solid ammonium bromides and dried samples of the lipid stock solutions. The resultant solutions were sonicated for 1 min at 25 "C. All 13CNMR spectra were run at 62.93 MHz on a Bruker WM 250 spectrometer under proton noise decoupling at 45 "C. The deuterium signal from C6D6was employed as an external lock signal. All chemical shifts are related to Me& (C6D6 a t 128 ppm downfield from Me&). 2000-9000 transients were accumulated of spectral width 2000 Hz in 32K data points limiting the resolution to 0.005 (9)R. de Weerd, J. W. de Haan, L. J. M. van de Ven, M. Achten, and H. M. Buck, J . Phys. Chem., in press. (10) A. B. Scott and H. V. Tartar, J . Am. Chem. SOC.,65,692 (1943).

TABLE 11: (De-)shieldings upon Mixed Micelle Formation of C,TAB and DOPCa mixing ratios carbon no.

4:l

2:l

1:l

1:2

1:4

C,TAB t O . l l +0.08 +0.06 t 0 . 0 3 t 0 . 1 4 +0.10 + 0.07 + 0.04 c3 +0.17 +0.13 t 0.08 + 0.04 c4 t 0 . 1 7 t 0 . 1 3 +0.08 + 0.04 c, + 0 . 1 4 +0.10 t 0.07 + 0.04 6' + 0 . 1 1 t 0 . 0 5 t 0.04 t 0.02 c7 t 0.07 t 0.05 + 0.04 + 0 . 0 2 c6 DOPC C, (sn-1) + 0.00 +o.oo +o.oo t 0.00 + 0.00 (sn-2) t0.00 t o . 0 0 +o.oo + 0.00 + 0.00 C, (sn-1) t 0 . 0 2 t o . 0 1 +0.01 +0.01 + 0.00 (sn-2) t 0.02 +o.oo +o.oo + 0.00 -0.01 c, (sn-1) + 0.00 -0.02 -0.03 -0.04 -0.05 (sn-2) + 0.05 + 0 . 0 3 + 0 . 0 2 + 0 . 0 1 + 0.00 t 0.04 + 0 . 0 3 + 0 . 0 2 + 0.01 -0.01 c, + 0 . 0 4 t 0 . 0 3 + 0 . 0 2 c0.01 -0.01 C, (sn-1) + 0 . 0 3 +0.01 +o.oo + 0.00 -0.02 (sn-2) + 0.03 +0.01 +o.oo + 0.00 -0.02 C, (sn-1) + 0 . 0 2 +o.oo +o.oo -0.01 -0.02 (sn-2) + 0 . 0 2 +o.oo -0.01 -0.01 -0.03 c, (sn-1) + 0.00 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.04 (sn-2) +o.oo -0.02 -0.02 -0.02 -0.03 The total detergent concentration is 50 mM. Mixing ratios are defined as the quotient of the concentrations of the DOPC and the ammonium bromide. c2

t0.16 +0.19 +0.26 +0.26 +0.21 +0.13 t0.10

ppm. The pulsewidth was set to a 90" flip angle. Results 13CNMR chemical shifts of the micelles have been assigned by combining literature data and relative relaxation time values, assuming that T1 values increase toward the apolar e n d ~ . ~ J 'Such a pattern was first suggested by Allerhand et al.'la and subsequently used by others.llbe It is primarily based on increased segmental motions or rotational diffusions near the free ends of the chains. Such (11) (a) E.Williams, B. Sears, A. Allerhand, and E. H. Cordes, J.Am. Chem. SOC.,95,4871 (1973); (b) D. Canet, J. Brondeau, H. Nery, and J. P. Marchal, Chem. Phys. Lett., 72,184 (1980); ( c ) H. Wennerstrom, B. Lindman, 0. Soderman, T. Drakenberg, and J. B. Rosenholm, J. Am. Chem. SOC.,101,6860 (1979); (d) M. van Bockstaele, J. Gelan, H. Martens, J. Put, F. de Schrijver, and J. c. Dederen, Chem. Phys. Lett., 70, 605 (1980); (e) R. M. Levy,M. Karplus, and P. G. Wolynes, J.Am. Chem. SOC.,103,5998 (1981), and references therein.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Vol. 86, No. 13, 1982

2530

TABLE V : (De-)shieldingsupon Mixed Micelle Formation of C,,TAB and DOPC'

TABLE 111: (De-)shieldings upon Mixed Micelle Formation of C,,TAB and DOPC' mixing ratios carbon no.

2:l

1:l

mixing ratios

1:2

1:4

t0.04 t0.10 +0.16 t0.17 40.16 +0.15

tO.01

carbon no.

4:l

C ,,TAB

ci c, C, g:b

CTb C,

c, C 1" CII

c

4 :1

de Weerd et al.

12

+0.21 +0.37 t0.55 tO.59 +0.51 t0.41 t0.49 iO.31 +0.20 10.13 -0.12

+0.15 t0.28 t0.41 t0.44 10.43 ~0.39

+0.09 -0.17 +0.29 +0.29 t0.28 ~0.26 -0.30 +0.19 +0.26 1 0 . 1 7 +0.16 + 0 . 1 1 10.06 t 0 . 0 5 --0.11 --0.10

+0.04 +0.07 +0.08 +0.08

t0.07 t0.10 + 0 . 0 3 +0.10 +0.04 t 0 . 0 5 +0.02 +0.01 ~ 0 . 0 0 -0.09 -0.07

DOPC

+0.03 (sn-2) +0.01 t 0 . 0 3 C, (sn-1) +0.03 t 0 . 0 4 (sn-2) +0.02 +0.01 C, (sn-1) +0.01 --0.01 (sn-2) - 0 . 0 5 1 0 . 0 4 20.05 +0.04 c, -0.05 +0.04 C, (sn-1) 1 0 . 0 4 +0.04 (sn-2) +0.04 +0.04 C, (sn-1) +0.04 + 0 . 0 3 (sn-2) t 0 . 0 3 + 0 . 0 2 C, (sn-1) 40.03 + 0 . 0 5 (sn-2) t 0 . 0 3 +0.05

C, (sn-1)

+0.02

+0.05 +0.05 +0.04 t0.01 -0.04 +0.03 +0.02 t0.02 10.02 t0.02 +0.03 +0.02 t0.06 +0.07

+0.06 +0.06 +0.04

t0.00

+0.09 +0.09 +0.04

+o.oo

-0.01 +0.01 +0.01 CO.01

t0.01

+0.01 +0.03

+0.01

+O.OO +0.08 +0.08

+0.02 t0.00 +0.09 -0.09

The a The total detergent concentration is 50 mM. signals of the carbon atoms could not be assigned properly.

c2 c3

c,

CII

c,: c I3 c I? CIS

c

I6

C, (sn-1)

(sn-2) C, (sn-1) (sn-2) C, (sn-1) (sn-2)

+0.05

+0.22 +0.48 +0.16 -0.12 -0.17

-0.16 -0.16 -0.30 +0.03 +0.01 +0.04 t0.01 -0.01 +0.05

c,

+0.04 +0.04

C, (sn-1)

+0.05 t0.05 +0.05

(sn-2) C, (sn-1) (sn-2) C, (sn-1) (sn-2)

+0.03 +0.11 +0.10

2:l

1:2

1:l

C ,,TAB +0.02 +0.02 +0.16 +0.09 +0.24 +0.16 +0.14 +0.04 -0.07 -0.02 -0.12 -0.07 -0.08 -0.12 -0.13 -0.07 -0.26 -0.19

1:4

+0.01

-0.01 +0.03 t 0.04 +0.03 + 0.04 -0.01 -0.00 -0.04 -0.0 2 -0.04 -0.02 -0.06 -0.03 -0.07 -0.12

+0.05 +0.08

DOPC +0.04 +0.05 t 0 . 0 8 +0.03 +0.05 +0.08 +0.04 +0.04 +0.04 +o.oo -0.01 -0.01 -0.03 -0.05 -0.06 +0.03 +0.01 + O . O O +0.01 +0.02 i 0 . 0 2 +0.01 +0.02 +0.02 1 0 . 0 4 +0.03 +0.02 t 0 . 0 4 +0.03 +0.02 +0.06 +0.07 +0.04 +0.05 +0.15 +0.20 + 0 . 2 5 t 0 . 1 4 +0.18 +0.22

+ 0.09 +0.10

+ 0.05 +o.oo -0.09

+ 0.00 +0.04 + 0.04 + 0.02 + 0.02

+0.28 +0.24

" The total detergent concentration is 50 mM. TABLE VI: (De- khieldings upon Mixed Micelle Formation of C,,TAB and DOPC" mixing ratios

TABLE IV : (De-)shieldingsupon Mixed Micelle Formation of C,,TAB and DOPC' mixing ratios carbon no.

4:l

2:l C ,,TAB

c: c,

+0.10 t 0 . 0 6

c4

1

0.38

-0.20 +0.30

-0.01 -0.06 -0.11 -0.32

+0.03 -0.03 -0.09 -0.30

-0.27

c c II 1"

CI2

c

13

C 14

c 2(sn-1) c, c,

(sn-2) (sn-1) (sn-2) (sn-1) (sn-2)

c, c, (sn-1) c, c,

1:l

(sn-2) (sn-1) (sn-2) (sn-ij (sn-2)

+0.03 -0.14 ~0.21 t 0.08 +0.03 -0.01 -0.07 -0.24

carbon no.

1:2

1:4

+0.03 +0.02 +0.03 +0.01 -0.01 + 0.00 -0.04 i 0 . 0 5 +0.03 +0.02 + 0.04 + 0.04 + 0 . 0 2 + 0.04 +0.01 + 0.04 +0.03 +0.04 + 0 . 0 4 t 0 . 0 3 +0.02 +o.o3 +o.os t0.03 t0.09 +0.01 0.00 +0.03

4

0.01

~ 0 . 0 8 +0.05

+0.13 + 0.08 + 0.04 -0.00 -0.03 -0.15

+0.05 +0.08 +0.04 1 0 . 0 7 ~ 0 . 0 3 +0.04 -0.01 -0.01 -0.07 -0.07 +O.OO

+o.oo TO.OO

to.00

-0.02 +0.04

t0.02 +o.i3 +0.13

c3 c4

+ 0.02

+0.07 + 0.04 +0.03 -0.00 -0.01 -0.08

DOPC +

c2

+o.oo

+0.01 to.01 + 0.00 +0.02 + 0.06 t 0.04 +o.i8 +0.17

io.09 t 0.09 + 0.04

+o.oo

-0.07 -0.01 +0.01 + 0.01 + 0.00 + 0.01 + 0.06 + 0.04 +0.21 iO.20

" The total detergent concentration is 50 mM. a pattern is quite general.llf Results are presented in Table I. Tables 11-VI show the chemical shift changes of the mixed micelles with respect to the micelle solutions of the pure detergents. Assignments of the different carbon pairs to the sn-1 and sn-2 chains have been performed by assuming that the spin-lattice relaxation times of the carbon atoms of the sn-1 chain are larger compared to those of the sn-2 chain.5

c

14

CIS

c

16

CI, C I"

4:l -0.01 +0.17 10.24 -0.22 -0.29 -0.23 -0.20 -0.29

2:l

1:l

C ,,TAB -0.03 -0.03 +0.11 t 0 . 0 9 t 0 . 1 6 +0.13 -0.14 -0.10 -0.20 -0.17 -0.17 -0.14 -0.15 -0.13 -0.20 -0.23

1:2 -0.03

1:4

-0.03

+0.05

+ 0.02

+0.07 -0.02 -0.10 -0.08 -0.07 -0.12

+0.02 -0.00 -0.07

t 0.09

-0.06 -0.06 -0.08

DOPC C, (sn-1)

(sn-2) C3 (sn-1) (sn-2) c4(sn-1) (sn-2)

+0.03 +0.01 +0.04 +0.01

+o.oo

t 0.05

CS

+0.05 t0.05

C, (sn-1)

+0.06 +0.06 +0.03 +0.02

(sn-2) C, (sa-1) (sn-2) C, (sn-1) (sn-2) " The total

+0.05

+0.06

+0.08

+0.03

1-0.07

+0.05

+0.05 t0.05

+0.01

+0.01

+o.oo + 0.05

+0.02 to.00 +0.04

+0.05 +0.05

+0.06 t0.06

+o.oo

+0.05 +0.05 +0.05

+0.07 +0.06 +0.07 +0.06 +0.09 t0.10 +0.06 +0.08 1-0.15 +0.21 +0.24 +0.14 +0.19 1 0 . 2 1 detergent concentration is

t0.06

+0.07 t0.07

+ 0.09 + 0.06 + 0.02 -0.02 + 0.03 t 0.05 +0.05

+ 0.06

+ 0.06

+0.29 +0.31 +0.26 +0.27 50 mM.

Discussion Micelle Solutions of DOPC. The present measurements yield a better resolution for the dioctanoyl-L-a-phosphatidylcholine (DOPC)micelles (see Table I) with respect to recently published data.5 The visibility of the nonequivalent behavior is not retricted to carbon atoms close to the carbonyl function5 but extends over almost the complete chains. Comparing the w-methyl resonances of the lecithin micelles with micellar solutions of the quaternary ammonium detergents shows a decreased chain packing for the

Fluidization of the Micellar Interior

former. Since significant water penetration can be ruled out: a possible explanation is that the lecithin head groups are much bulkier than those of the n-alkyl detergents and that the micellar shape is rather rodlike (vide infra). The 13C NMR chemical shifts of the DOPC micelles were insensitive to the concentration of the solution from 5 to 50 mM. This indicates that no changes in molecular packing and concomittant conformational changes occur. Recently, Tausk et al.12 showed that, at the concentrations investigated here, the micelle size is larger than spherical. Apparently, this growth of the DOPC micelles does not influence the 13CNMR spectra significantly, since the line widths are also constant over the entire concentration range. Furthermore, the results indicate a similarity between the behavior of mixed n-alkanoates of different chain lengthsg and synthetic short-chain lecithins in an aqueous medium presented here: both systems represent a magnetic nonequivalence between the different alkyl chains for comparable carbon atoms. Mixed Micelles of DOPC and Several n-dlkyltrimethylammonium Bromides. Several aspects have to be considered upon interpreting 13CNMR chemical shifts of DOPC micelles mixed with amphiphiles of different effective chain lengths. Analogous situations in simple mixed micelles of alkanoates have been discussed in detail in a previous paper.g It was shown that mainly two factors will influence 13CNMR chemical shifts of alkane moieties, viz. different conformational equilibria and/or different env i r ~ n m e n t s . ~Sometimes, J~ these two factors are inter~0nnected.l~Different environments per se (solvents, packing) will cause different medium effects on the chemical shifts. The relative magnitudes at different positions in a solute are governed by site factors.16J8 For convenience, relative site factors within an alkane chain are presented in Figure 2e. So that van der Waals solvent effects on the one hand and conformational changes on the other hand could be distinguished, a schematic representation of As’s is given (see Figure 2). In terms of 13CNMR chemical shift changes Figure 2a reproduces schematically the influence of contributions of gauche conformers for the alkyl fragments investigated here. Literature data from Mann, Bovey, Schneider, de Haan, and c ~ - w o r k e r s were ~ ~ J ~combined in order to arrive at the absolute values of the A& upon formation of a single gauche from an anti conformer. With respect to an anti isomer carbon atoms at a relative 1,4 gauche position are shifted upfield by about 4 ppm (except o-methyl carbons which are shielded by about 5 ppm). Intermediate carbons (12)R.J. M.Tausk, J. Karmiggelt, C. Oudshoorn, and J. Th. G . Overbeek, Biophys. Chem., 1, 175 (1974);R.J. M.Tausk, J. van Esch, J. Karmiggelt, G. Voordouw, and J. Th. G . Overbeek, Biophys. Chem., 1, 184 (1974);R. J. M. Tausk, C. Oudshoorn, and J. Th. G. Overbeek, Biophys. Chem., 2,53 (1974). (13)B. Perason, T. Drakenberg, and B. Lindman, J.Phys. Chem., 80, 2124 (1976). (14)N. 0.Petersen and S. I. Chan, Biochemistry, 16, 2657 (1977). (15)J. W.de Haan, L. J. M. van de Ven, A. R. N. Wilson, A. E. van der Hout-Lodder, C. Altona, and D. H. Faber, Org. Magn. Reson., 8,477 (1976). (16)J. W.de Haan, L. J. M. van de Ven, and A. BuEinskl, J. Phys. Chem., preceding article in this issue. (17)W.L. Earland and D. L. Vanderhart, Macromolecules, 12, 762 (1979);C. A.Fyfe, J. R. Lyerla, W. Volksen, and C. S. Yannoni, ibid., 12, 757 (1979). (18)D. Cans, B. Tiffon, and J. E. Dubois, Tetrahedron Lett., 24,2075 (1976);B. Tiffon and J. P. Doucet, Can. J. Chem., 54,2045(1976);A. R. N.Wilson, L. J. M. van de Ven, and J. W. de Haan, Org. Magn. Reson., 6,601 (1974). (19)H.N.Cheng and F. A. Bovey, Org. Magn. Reson., 11,457(1978); G . Mann, E. Kleinpeter, and H. Werner, ibid., 11, 561 (1978);H.-J. Schneider and W. Freitag, J . Am. Chem. SOC.,98,478 (1976).

The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Vol. 86, No. 13, 1982 2531

Flgure 1. Average orientation of monomers within a part of a cross section of a 1:l mixed micelle of D O E and C,BTAB. For convenience all extended conformations are drawn.

change by about half this magnitude. Taking into account all possible gauche conformers in different ratios results in the shielding patterns presented in Figure 2b-c. Figure 2d shows the opposite effects due to generating possible anti conformers from gauche conformers. Quite obviously, no clear-cut distinction between the two aspects is possible in all cases. However, combining the literature data of Figure 2 and experimental data of Tables 11-VI, we are now able to indicate approximately to what extent conformational changes on the one hand and medium effects on the other hand will contribute to the observed As’s. A few consequences of the combined influences of conformational changes and alterations in environment will now be mentioned, in close analogy with mixed alkanoate micelles? First, shielding is expected for carbon atoms of those parts of the detergent chains which protrude from the DOPC acyl chains (see Figure 1). The average distances between those alkyl fragments are then larger than in their single micellar solutions. This is the case for the ClzTABup to and including the C18TABdetergent. (The following abbreviations have been used: CETAB, noctyltrimethylammonium bromide; C12TAB, n-dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide; C1,TAB, n-tetradecyltrimethylammonium bromide; C16TAB, n-hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide; C18TAB, n-octadecyltrimethylammonium bromide; DOPC, dioctanoyl-L-a-lecithin.) Larger interchain distances cause a diminuation of deshielding van der Waals solvent effects. In addition, increased differences in effective chain lengths may possibly lead to conformational changes toward more kinking. This is consistent with the conclusions of Petersen and Chan’, and de Haan and van de Ven,15 who describe intramolecular alterations as a consequence of a decrease of correlated intermolecular van der Waals attractive interactions going from a relatively ordered (single micellar) to a relatively disordered (mixed micellar) state, rather than the reverse. A decrease in intermolecular interactions (Le., by “chain unpacking”) will lead to shielding, as mentioned for neat and diluted alkanes.16 Similar conclusions were reached from 13C studies of polyethylene in different packing states.” Furthermore, the above-mentioned shielding effects will be enhanced upon raising the concentration of the zwitterionic surfactant. Second, for the carbons of the part of the n-alkyl detergent chains which are situated directly between DOPC molecules in the mixed micelles, deshieldings are anticipated, caused by increased deshielding van der Waals interactions and/or by an increase in the ratio of anti to gauche isomers. These effects are thus expected to decrease upon raising the concentration of the quaternary detergent. Consequently, for the lecithin acyl chains incorporated in micelles of longer n-alkyl chain amphiphiles, also de-

2532

The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Vol. 86, No. 13, 1982

shieldings are expected due to increasing solvent effects along with conformational changes toward more extended forms. If only solvent effects participate, deshieldings should correspond to the respective site factors, thus leading to maximal differences for the methyl carbons.18 These differences have to increase upon lowering the lipid concentration. Finally, for the alkyl detergents possessing effectively shorter alkyl chains as compared with DOPC, deshielding effects are anticipated (vide supra). Thus, shieldings will occur for the carbons for those parts of the lecithin acyl chains which protrude from the n-alkyl amphiphile chains. Recapitulating, combining literature data of Figure 2 and experimental data of Table I1 we are now able to indicate approximately to which extent conformational changes on the one hand and solvent effects on the other hand will contribute to the observed Ad’s. Combination of these data and the observed deshieldings upon intercalating C8TAB in DOPC micelles leads to the following conclusion. C8TABbecomes more extended with respect to its single micelle over the entire concentration range (Table 11, the 1:4 up to and including the 4:l mixing ratio). This is in accordance with recently published observations of Lindman and co-workers.m Effects are most distinct in mixed micelles containing an excess of lecithin (Le., the 4 1 mixing ratio), where the c8TAB undergoes the largest disturbing effect from the lecithin molecules. Regarding DOPC/C12TABmixed micelles, deshieldings are observed for the C2-Cll alkyl chain fragment indicating effects comparable with the DOPC/C8TAB mixed micelle. However, pronounced shielding is obtained for the C12 carbon atom. Since no extra contributions of gauche conformers are feasible (Figure 2 vs. Table 111), only decreasing van der Waals solvent effects are responsible. The reason is that the C12TABsurfactant posesses a greater effective length than the DOPC molecules in the mixed Incorporating C1,TAB in DOPC micelles increases the effective chain length of the n-alkyltrimethylammonium detergent. This is reflected by the observed shielding effects for the C11-C14 segment of the C14TAB with respect to ita single micelle. It is clear that conformationalchanges are possible in principle. For folding around the C12-C13 bond one would expect shielding at Cll (see Figure 2a). This, however, is not observed (see Table IV). A decrease in molecular packing is able to cause the experimental Ad’s. Thus alkyl chain separation as compared with the single micelles is accomplished. Furthermore, the pattern of the observed A6’s of the first eleven carbons resembles that of the C12TABmolecules in their mixed micelles. For the DOPC/C16TAB mixed micelles shieldings are observed for the cll-C16 part of the C16TABamphiphiles, thus showing once more an increase of the effective chain length. It is still impossible to take large contributions of gauche isomers into account (see Figure 2 and Table V), due to the discrepancy between the observed and calculated A6’s (for all anti/gauche ratios). However, comparing observed with calculated AS’S for the c14418 fragment of the C18TA.B surfactant in its mixed micellar systems with DOPC indeed indicates pronounced contributions of gauche conformers, around the C16-C17carbon bond, apart from unpacking effects (cf. the experimental shielding of the CI4methylene carbon with its calculated value based on conformational changes). (20)J. B. Rosenholm, T. Drakenberg, and B. Lindman, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 63, 538 (1978). (21)P.Mukerjee and K. J. MyseLs, Natl. Stand. Ref. Data Ser., Natl. Bur. Stand., No.-36 (1971).

de Weerd et al.

ratio i:II

‘14

‘15

‘16

1: 9

‘13

‘12

Calc.

-0.32

-0.16

-0.14

-0.21

-0.03

Exp.

-0.3C

-0.16

-0.16

-0.17

-0.12

Q

rat10

‘18

‘17

‘16

‘15

‘14

‘13

calc.

-0.29

-0.19

-0.23

-0.30

-0.12

-0.08

Exp.

-0.29

-0.20

-5.23

-0.29

-0.22

-

:::1:111::v a.2:

2:6

‘12

0.00

-C gauche gauche gauche gauche gauche

c,-c;

‘ _c3-c4

c -c. 4

C5-Cg

3

Cg-C,

ratio:

1

caic.

+0.10

+0.12

tO.21

r0.26

t0.26

+0.21

10.12

10.08

EX^.

+0.10

+0.13

10.21

10.26

~0.26 10.19

10.16

-

i

‘0

1

:

1.7

1

:

‘6

‘7

:

‘5

1

‘4

‘3

‘2

‘1

d -

-5

-2

- 1

- 2

- 2

- 2

-e Figure 2. The influence (in ppm) of single gauche conformers on the chemical shifts of all extended hydrocarbon chain fragments (a). (b) Possible gauche conformers of that part of the quaternary C,,TAB detergent chain protruding from the DOPC molecules in their mixed micelles. Full circles at the left side of the chain fragments represent the methyl carbon atoms. The calculated shielding pattern which resembles closest the experimental data of the c1&6 segment Is given. It was obtalned by wel@~hg the gauche conformers in the ratio indicated. (c) Similar to b, for Ci8TAB in mixed micelles with DOPC. Again only v a k which are cbsest to the experiments are mentioned. (d) Deshielding pattern of C8TABin DOPC micelles obtained with opposite values of a, assuming almost equal contrlbutions of anti conformers around all bonds. (e) Relative site factors within an alkane chain fragment due to decreaslng van der Waals interactions.“

In retrospect, the situation described here is similar to that of the mixed micelles of potassium dodecanoate and potassium hexanoate described in a previous paper.g For this latter case, we were not in a position to rule out conformational changes of the dodecanoatechains with respect to their single micelles. A definite conclusion could not be reached due to our inability to detect the C8 resonance of the dodecanoate chain properly. For the phospholipid in its mixed micelles the chemical shift differences of both chains are retained almost independently of chain length and concentration of the n-alkyltrimethylammonium bromide detergents. Conse-

2533

J. Phys. Chem. 1982, 86, 2533-2537

quently, this implies a rather unaltered average conformational behavior of the sn-1 and sn-2 chains in the mixed micelles. Only van der Waals solvent effects change upon mixed micelle formation with the quaternary surfactant molecules. This is clearly demonstrated by maximum differences in chemical shift for the methyl carbonsl6reflecting the respective site factors.18 Logically, induced differences are most pronounced for mixed micelles containing less lecithin (Le., the 1:4 mixing ratio) and decrease toward the 4 1 mixing ratio. At the lowest ratio the lecithin undergoes the largest disturbing effect from the surrounding quaternary detergent molecules. This perturbation fades as the lipid concentration is raised to ratios

where the n-alkyl amphiphiles become the perturbed moieties in mixed micelles mainly containing lipid molecules (Le,, the 4:l mixing ratio). So, the possibility has been demonstrated to determine, at least approximately, to what extent n-alkyl detergents incorporated in DOPC micelles undergo additional chain bendings as compared with the single micelle solution. Acknowledgment. This investigation has been supported by the Netherlands Foundation for Chemical Research (SON) with financial aid from the Netherlands Organization for the Advancement of Pure Research (ZWO).

Mixed Micelles of GM1 Ganglioside and a Nonionic Amphiphile Marlo Cortl,' CISE Sp.A., 20090 Segrate, Milano, Italy

Vlttorlo Degiorglo, Istituto di Flsica Applicata, Universiti di Pavla, 27100 Pavla, Italy

Rlccardo Ghldonl, and Sandro Sonnlno Department of Biological Chemistry, The Medical School, University of Milano, Milano, Italy (Received: November 13, 1981; I n Final Form: February 8, 1982)

Aqueous solutions containing a mixture of two amphiphiles, a nonionic surfactant, n-dodecyl octaoxyethylene glycol monoether (ClZEs), and a biological lipid, the ganglioside GM1, are investigated by static and dynamic light scattering. It is found that mixed micelles are formed in the whole range of investigated molar ratios. The theory of light scattering from solutions of homogeneous micelles is generalized to the case of mixed micelles. The final formula is used to derive from the experimental data the aggregation number of the mixed micelle. A simple phenomenological law is proposed to describe the dependence of the aggregation number on the molar ratio between the two amphiphiles.

Introduction The micelles formed in aqueous solutions of two amphiphiles contain usually both components and are in equilibrium with the two monomeric species in the aqueous phase. Several experimental and theoretical investigations have discussed the dependence of the monomer concentrations on the molar ratio between the two components and on the total amphiphile c~ncentration.'-~In particular,calculations of the mixed critical micelle concentration have been performed and compared with experimental data obtained through surface tension and electrical conductivity measurement^.'-^ Little information exists in the literature about the size and the aggregation number of the mixed micelles. We have recently reported experiments on mixed micelles of a biological glycolipid, the ganglioside GM1, and a commercial nonionic surfactant, Triton X-100.4 Such experiments were performed with the aim of establishing a correlation between the structural organization of lipid monomers and the activity of an enzyme which uses the GM1 as a substrate. Other authors (1) H.Lange and K. H. Beck, Kolloid 2.2.Polym. 251, 424 (1973). (2) J. Clint, J. Chem. SOC.,71, 1327 (1975). (3) D. N. Rubingh in "Solution Chemistry of Surfactants",Vol. 1, K. L. Mittal, Ed., Plenum Press, New York, 1979,. p 337. (4) M. Corti, V.Degiorgio, S. Sonnino, R. Ghldoni, M. Masserini, and G. Tettamanti, Chem. Phys. Lipids, 28, 197 (1981). 0022-3654/82/2086-2533$01.25/0

had previously studied mixed micelles of phospholipids arid Triton X-100 for similar biochemical application^.^^^ We present in this paper a light-scattering investigation of aqueous solutions containing the ganglioside GM1 and a pure nonionic surfactant, n-dodecyl octaoxyethylene glycol monoether (C12E8). From the point of view of a physicochemical study of mixed micelles, such a system is interesting because the molecular weight of the GM1 micelle is about 8 times that of the C12E8 micelle. This allows one to establish in a very direct way by the lightscattering measurement that the two amphiphiles form mixed micelles, as shown later on. Besides the fact that C12E8is a better characterized component than Triton X-100, there is a further advantage in using C12E8because the lower consolute temperature is considerably higher for C12E8 than that found for Triton X-100. This means that the temperature range over which the experimental results reflect the properties of the individual micelle instead of cooperative properties associated with the second-order phase transition is much larger for ClzE8 and includes, in particular, the room temperature. ~~~

~

(5) E. A. Dennis, A. A. Ribeiro, M. F. Robers, and R. J. Robson in 'Solution Chemistry of Surfactanh", Vol. 1, K.L.Mittal, Ed., Plenum Press, New York, 1979, p 175. (6) S. Yedgar, Y. Barenholz, and V. G. Cooper, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 363, 98 (1974).

0 1982 American Chemical Society