Subscriber access provided by TUFTS UNIV
Biotechnology and Biological Transformations
Molecular rearrangement of glucans from natural starch to form size-controlled functional magnetic polymer beads Ke Luo, Ki-Baek Jeong, Sang-Mook You, Da-Hee Lee, and Young-Rok Kim J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01590 • Publication Date (Web): 14 Jun 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on June 16, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1 2 3
Molecular rearrangement of glucans from natural starch to form size-controlled functional magnetic polymer beads
4 5 6
Ke Luo,† Ki-Baek Jeong,† Sang-Mook You, Da-Hee Lee, and Young-Rok Kim*
7 8
Institute of Life Sciences and Resources & Department of Food Science and
9
Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, 17104
10
South Korea
11 12
* Corresponding author.
13
Tel: +82-31-201-3830
14
Fax: +82-31-204-8116
15
E-mail address:
[email protected] 16 17 18
1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
19
ABSTRACT: Herein, we report a fairly simple and environmentally friendly
20
approach for the fabrication of starch-based magnetic polymer beads (SMPBs) with
21
uniform shape and size through spontaneous rearrangement of short chain glucan
22
(SCG) produced by enzymatic debranching of waxy maize starch. The paramagnetic
23
materials, dextran-coated iron oxide nanoparticles (Dex@IONPs), were readily
24
incorporated into the starch microstructure and rendered a superparamagnetic
25
property to the SMPBs. The morphology and size of resulting SMPBs turned out to be
26
modulated by Dex@IONPs in concentration dependent manner, of which
27
Dex@IONPs was assumed to be acting as a seed inducing the epitaxial crystallization
28
of SCG and further transforming it into homogeneous microparticles. The surface of
29
SMPBs was readily functionalized with antibody through one step reaction using a
30
linker protein. The immuno-SMPBs showed great capture efficiency (>90%) for
31
target bacteria. The colloidal stability and favorable surface environment for
32
biomolecules are believed to be responsible for the high capture efficiency and
33
specificity of the SMPBs. Furthermore, the captured bacteria along with antibody and
34
linker protein were effectively eluted from the surface of SMPBs by adding free
35
maltose, making this new material suitable for various chromatographic applications.
36 37 38
KEYWORDS: polymeric magnetic beads, waxy maize starch, debranching, self-
39
assembly, epitaxial growth.
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 34
Page 3 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
40
41
Polymeric magnetic beads (PMBs) are spherical microstructure of polymeric
42
materials containing magnetic particles in dispersed or core-shell form. Due to the
43
paramagnetic nature, PMBs have mainly been utilized to separate target components
44
from heterogeneous matrices by external magnetic force upon functionalizing the
45
surface of PMBs with a specific ligand that binds to the target. The colloidal stability
46
of PMBs in aqueous environment along with versatile surface functionalization
47
techniques have extended its applications to many areas, such as targeted drug
48
delivery, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic hyperthermia, bio-separation,
49
and biosensing.1-4 The size and surface functionality are among the most critical
50
factors that determine the application of PMBs. In particular, micrometer-sized
51
spherical PMBs receive considerable attention in analytical field, including
52
immunomagnetic separation, column-based chromatography, and flow cytometry,
53
where its shape, size, porosity, surface functionality, and monodispersity should be
54
strictly controlled.5-6 A range of natural and synthetic polymers, such as dextran,
55
alginate, chitosan, polyaspartate, polystyrene, and polyacrylamide, are currently used
56
as a base materials for the synthesis of PMBs.7 The synthesis of PMBs using those
57
materials is typically carried out by emulsion polymerization and sol-gel process,8-9
58
microwave-assisted hydrothermal,10 sonochemical methods,11 which often require
59
complicated procedures and large energy consumption. They could also lead to
60
negative environmental impacts as well as causing a limited applications on large-
61
scale production. Achieving a high colloidal stability as well as controlling the size of
INTRODUCTION
3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
62
Page 4 of 34
PMBs for desired applications is another challenging tasks that need to be resolved.
63
Starch, as one of the most abundant polysaccharide in nature, is consisting of a
64
large number of glucose molecules joined by glycosidic bonds and serves as an
65
energy reserve in plants. Amylose is one of the major components in starch and is
66
mostly linear homopolymer of glucose linked with α(1,4) glycosidic bonds.
67
Amylopectin, another major component of starch, is a branched macromolecule
68
composed of α(1,4)-D-glucan chains linked with 5-6% α(1,6) bonds. The ratio of
69
amylose and amylopectin in starch varies among different types of plants. A short-
70
chain amylose or short-chain glucan (SCG) have been reported to recrystallize in
71
aqueous solution to form spherical microstructures and its mechanisms of self-
72
assembly have been intensively studied to understand the structural changes in starch
73
granules and to produce amylose-based microstructures.12 Due to their structural
74
stability, renewable and biocompatible nature, starch microparticles have emerged as
75
an effective carrier or encapsulation agent for various guest molecules, such as carbon
76
nanotubes,13 iron oxide nanoparticles,14 fatty acids,15 and β-carotene.16 SCG can be
77
produced through polymerization of glucose molecules into a linear glucan chain
78
using specific enzymes, such as phosphorylase or amylosucrase.13, 17 However, these
79
enzymes require a highly selective glycosylation reaction between a donor and an
80
acceptor molecule to form α(1,4)-linked glucan. For example, phosphorylase needs
81
expensive
82
oligosacchraides as a glycosyl acceptor.12 On the other hand, amylosucrase provides a
glucose-1-phosphate
(G-1-P)
as
a
glucosyl
4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
donor
and
malto-
Page 5 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
83
better means of producing linear glucan since it requires sucrose as a sole substrate for
84
the synthesis of linear glucan with a DP of 40~50.13 However, the conversion rate of
85
the substrate into a linear glucan in the amylosucrase-mediated catalytic process was
86
shown to be ~20%,18 which limits its applications in mass production.
87
Another approach to produce SCG is debranching amylopectins that contain a
88
large number of short-chain glucans linked by α(1,6) bonds. Debranching enzymes,
89
such as pullulanase and isoamylase, provide simple, effective and environmentally
90
friendly means of producing SCG by cleaving α(1,6)-linkages bonds in pullulan,
91
amylopectin, or related polysaccharides.19 Waxy starches, such as waxy maize, waxy
92
potato, and waxy rice starch, are good candidate to produce SCG by debranching
93
reaction since their main component is amylopectin with only trace amount of
94
amylose present. The catalytic action of these enzymes has been reported to produce
95
SCG, which can be crystallized directly into spherical microstructure in high yield
96
(85%) in aqueous environment without the need of any organic solvent and energy
97
consumption.20-21 However, their morphologies and sizes were highly heterogeneous,
98
limiting their applications in biomedical and analytical fields. Herein, we present a
99
fairly simple and eco-friendly approach for fabrication of monodisperse starch-based
100
magnetic polymer beads (SMPBs) with controlled particle size by modulating the
101
reaction with epitaxial seeding effect using Dex@IONPs, which could regulate the
102
nucleation and crystal growth during self-assembly process. The factors affecting the
103
size and polydispersity of SMPBs were also investigated. Furthermore, its potential as
5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
104
a highly efficient immunomagnetic separation material is presented.
105
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
106
Materials. Pullulanase, ferrous chloride tetrahydrate (FeCl2·4H2O), dextran (Mw
107
9000-11000), γ-Fe2O3, Tris–HCl, lysozyme, and isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside
108
(IPTG), 5(6)-carboxyfluoroscein diacetate (CFDA) were purchased from Sigma-
109
Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Ferric chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O), ammonium
110
hydroxide, and acetone were purchased from Daejung (Siheung, Korea). Anti-
111
Escherichia coli O157 monoclonal antibody (FITC conjugate) was purchased from
112
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (Cambridge, MA, USA). Sodium acetate trihydrate and
113
waxy maize starch were obtained from Yakuri Pure Chemicals (Kyoto, Japan) and
114
Samyang Co (Seoul, Korea), respectively. Maize Starch was provided from Daesang
115
Co (Seoul, Korea). Ampicillin was supplied by Biosesang (Seongnam, Korea). All
116
restriction enzymes were acquired from New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA, USA).
117
Ni-NTA Superflow resin was obtained from Qiagen (Valencia, CA, USA).
118
Preparation of dextran-coated iron oxide nanoparticles (Dex@IONPs).
119
Dex@IONPs were synthesized by the coprecipitation process using dextran and iron
120
chloride as reported by Ahmadi with modification.22 Briefly, 80 mM of FeCl3·6H2O,
121
40 mM of FeCl2·4H2O, and 150 mg of dextran were dissolved in 20 ml deionized
122
water (DW). The mixture was purged with nitrogen gas to remove dissolved oxygen
123
in solution, followed by ultrasonication by a Q500 Sonicator (VC 750, Sonics &
124
Materials Inc., Newtown, CT, USA) with on/off cycle of 3s/3s in an ice bath for 3 min 6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 34
Page 7 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
125
at 30% amplitude concurrently through a 6-mm ultrasound probe. During the
126
sonication, 60 % ammonium hydroxide solution was added dropwise into the mixture
127
using pipette until the mixture turned to dark suspension. The synthesized
128
Dex@IONPs was washed several times with absolute ethanol and DW to remove
129
residual ammonium hydroxide and dextran, followed by sonication for 10 s. The final
130
product was stored at 4 °C until use. The mean particle size of Dex@IONPs was
131
estimated by counting at least 100 particles from the field emission scanning electron
132
microscopy (FE-SEM) images.
133
Preparation of iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs). Pristine IONPs were
134
synthesized by coprecipitation process as described above in the absence of dextran.
135
The synthesized IONPs were dissolved in 10 ml DW with a final concentration of 20
136
mg/ml and sonicated (Q500 Sonicator, Qsonica, Newtown, CT) with on/off cycle of
137
10s/10s in an ice bath for 30 min at 30% amplitude concurrently through a 13-mm
138
ultrasound probe. The sonicated sample was centrifuged at 3000xg for 20 min, and
139
the supernatant containing well-dispersed IONPs were transferred to a fresh tube. The
140
final product was stored at 4 °C until use. The mean particle size of IONPs was
141
estimated by counting at least 100 particles from the SEM images.
142
Preparation of starch magnetic polymer beads (SMPBs). Three grams of
143
waxy maize starch was dissolved in 30 ml of distilled-deionized water (DDW) and
144
boiled at 100 °C for 30 min for gelatinization. After cooling to 60 °C, the gelatinized
145
starch was treated with pullulanase through two-step reaction for debranching of 7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
146
amylopectin. In the first reaction, pullulanase (30 ASPU/ml) was added to the reaction,
147
which was subsequently incubated at 60 °C for 4 h. The reaction was stirred with a
148
glass stick every hour. After the incubation, 20 ml supernatant of the reaction solution
149
was transferred to a conical tube and the volume was adjusted to 50 ml with DDW. In
150
the second debranching reaction, the sample was treated with a fresh pullulanase to a
151
final concentration of 8 ASPU/ml and incubated at 65 °C for overnight. The sample
152
was centrifuged at 15000xg for 5 min, and 0.8 ml of the supernatant was transferred
153
to a fresh EP tube containing varying concentrations of IONPs or Dex@IONPs
154
ranging from 0 to 10 mg/ml. The mixture was then incubated at 4 °C for 24 h to
155
induce the self-assembly of SMPBs. The prepared SMPBs was washed 3 times with
156
DW and stored at 4 °C until use. The morphology and composition of the synthesized
157
SMPBs were analyzed by FE-SEM and TEM equipped with EDS elemental mapping
158
of iron, carbon and oxygen. Magnetic properties of SMPBs were measured using
159
physical property measurement system (16 T PPMS Dynacool, Quantum Design,
160
USA) at room temperature from −12000 to 12000 Oe.
161
Preparation of Maltose binding protein-tagged streptococcal protein G
162
(MBP-SPG) fusion protein. The recombinant MBP-SPG fusion protein was
163
prepared as described elsewhere.14 Briefly, E. coli DH5α harboring the MBP-SPG-His
164
expression vector were cultured in 500 mL LB broth containing ampicillin (0.1 mg/ml)
165
at 37 °C with shaking at 250 rpm. When reaching an OD600 of 0.7-0.8, 0.1 mM IPTG
166
was added to induce overexpression of the fusion protein and incubated further at
8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 34
Page 9 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
167
18 °C for 18 h. The cells were harvested by centrifugation (3000xg for 20 min at 4 °C)
168
and resuspended in 5ml of a lysis buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, and10
169
mM imidazole, pH 8.0) for 20 min at 4 °C, followed by sonication (Q500 Sonicator)
170
with on/off cycle of 10s/10s in an ice bath for 10 min at 20% amplitude concurrently
171
using a 6-mm ultrasound probe. After centrifugation at 3000xg for 20 min, the
172
supernatant was passed through a column packed with Ni-NTA resin (Qiagen). The
173
Ni-NTA column was washed with a washing buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl,
174
20 mM imidazole, pH 8.0), and the MBP-SPG proteins were eluted with an elution
175
buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 250 mM imidazole, pH 8.0). The purified
176
MBP-SPG was stored at 4 °C until needed.
177
Conjugation of antibody to SMPBs using MBP-SPG fusion protein. To
178
conjugate antibodies to the surface of SAMBs, the recombinant MBP-SPG fusion
179
protein was used as a cross-linker with the specific affinity of MBP and SPG to
180
glucan and the Fc region of the antibody, respectively.14 The synthesized SMPBs were
181
suspended in an aqueous solution containing 30 µg/ml of MBP-SPG, incubated at
182
4 °C for 30 min in a rotary shaker, washed 3 times with 1X PBS (pH 7.4), and then
183
resuspended in 1X PBS to a final concentration of 50 mg/ml. The FITC-labelled anti-
184
E. coli O157 antibody with a final concentration of 2 µg/ml was added to the solution
185
containing MBP-SPG-functionalized SMPBs. After incubating at 4 °C for 60 min in a
186
rotary shaker, the antibody-labelled SMPBs were washed 3 times with 1X PBS and
187
stored at 4 °C until needed. The conjugation of FITC-labeled antibodies on the surface
9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
188
of the SMPBs were confirmed by fluorescence microscopy (Nikon TE2000U, Tokyo,
189
Japan).
190
Immunomagnetic separation of target bacteria. Freshly cultured E. coli
191
O157:H7 was diluted serially to the concentrations ranging from 102 to 106 CFU/ml in
192
1X PBS. The antibody-labelled SMPBs were introduced to the serially diluted
193
samples to a final concentration of 10 mg/ml. After incubating the sample at room
194
temperature for 30 min with gentle rotation, the target bacteria were separated along
195
with the immuno-SAMBs to a side of tube by magnet, and 0.1 ml of the solution
196
containing unbound bacteria was plated on LB agar plates. All plates were incubated
197
at 37 ºC for 24 h, and expressed as log CFU/ml. The capture efficiency of the SMPBs
198
was determined by following equation:
%CE=
Ncon − Nunbound ×100 Ncon
199
where %CE is relative capture efficiency to the target bacteria, Ncon is the initial
200
concentration of target bacteria, Nunbound is the concentration of unbound bacteria. For
201
CFDA staining of E. coli O157:H7, the cultured cells were harvested and washed
202
twice in 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7) by centrifugation at 3000×g for 10 min at 4 °
203
C. One ml of the bacterial suspension was mixed with 10 µl of CFDA stock solution
204
(10 mM), followed by incubation at 37 °C for 30 min. For recycling, the antibody-
205
conjugated SMPBs were treated with an elution buffer containing 10 mM maltose for
206
5 min with rotating at 10 rpm, followed by washing three times with 1X PBS. The
10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 34
Page 11 of 34
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
207
recycled SMPBs were labeled again with anti-E. coli O157:H7 IgG in the presence of
208
MBP-SPG as aforementioned. The capture efficiency of the immuno-SMPBs were
209
tested through three successive recycling of the same material.
210
Statistical analysis. Capture efficiency of the immuno-SMPBs for target bacteria,
211
E. coli O157:H7, was compared over a range of bacterial concentration through two-
212
way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the GraphPad Prism 7 software package
213
(Graphpad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA; www.graphpad.com). Statistical
214
significance was accepted for P-value of