Mollweide projections, molecular orbital ... - ACS Publications

1) 0 inire:ws down thr prupwiun fnm tr tt, n on paqsing from 8, ... (b) Mollweide projection for this arrangement of six ligsnd atoms. ... '1q!qio dno...
0 downloads 0 Views 3MB Size
Mollweide Projections Molecular Orbital Symmetries o! : the Spherical Shell C. M. Quinn and J. G. McKiernan Department of Chemistry D. B. Redmond Department of Mathematics St. Patrick's College. Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland

Two recent papers ( I , 2) have initiated interest in the generator-orbital approach to the construction of symmetry-adapted LCAO functions. A difficulty in this approach or any other approach to molecular orbital symmetries is the problem surrounding the presentation of' three-dimensional details in a general, easily visualized form. A very convenient device for this ourDose is nrovided IIV the Mollweide oroiection (3) of cartography &hereby detail on the surfa'ce of a sphere can be presented as a two-dimensional map. We present in this paper a first application' of this device within the generator-orbital aooroach to molecular orbital svmmetries. ~ ~ m m e t r ~ - a d a pfunctions &d are obtained directly and oictoriallv. for -given molecular structures on the basis of the nodal structures of the central harmonic functions for which the Mollweide oroicrtioni are oresented. In this uauer the technique is illustrated for the ekes of ligand groipbrbitals. both o and a t m e in Oh svmmetrv. In the oaner which follows this (4) and eiiewheri(5, 6) we shall show how other interactions can be handled with eanal facilitv and summarize the usefulness of this new approach for receit cluster-orbital theory (7.8). Later (9) we shall show the utilitv of our approach for the presentation of correlation diagrams of the Walsh kind (lo), and the discussion of orbital symmetry conservation in reaction mechanisms (11). Mollwelde Proiectlons of the Soherlcal Harmonics In the generator-orbital approach, symmetry-adapted LCAO functions or localized eauivalent functions (1.2) result from the local matching a t lfgand orbital positions of the phases of harmonic functions or their hvbrid . spherical . equivalents, which are considered to he a t the center of the molecular structure. The validity of this technique, of course, stems from the fact that the spherical harmonics provide a set of basis functions for the irreducible representations of the spherical group RR and, therefore, present an overcomplete set for the reoresentiltion of all the irreducible representations of the molecular point groups, which determine the possible molecular orbital symmetries for a given molecular structure. The principal difficulty is the conceptual one of three dimensions. A knowledge of the phases of the spherical harmonics (or their hybrid equivalents for localized functions) in terms of their Mollweide projections removes this difficulty and in manv cases reduces the eeneration of aonrooriate .. . ligand orbital combinations to an exercise in the superimposition of svrnbols for the lieand orbitals on the basic set of ~ o l l w e i d eprojections. Mollweide's ellintical ~roiection for the surface of a unit . . sphere, i.e., a hollow globe is drawn in Figure 1.Viewed from along the +x axis the hollow globe is imagined to be split from top to bottom along a line passing from the point (OOI), the north pole, to the point (00 - I), the south pole, through the point (-loo), and then opened out and flattened onto a twodimensional plane so that the original equatorial circumference is preserved and divided in equal quarters bounded by the directions @,,@,-@,, and -& In Figure 1 these unit

from along the + x axis vectors identifying the dispositions of the axes of the Cartesian coordinate svstem throueh the unit snhere are marked in spherical polnr coordinatrs that conform to the rules 1) 0 inire:ws down thr p r u p w i u n f n m tr tt, n on paqsing from 8, t1,0.11in i ~ h mr x d ~ n a t e s r,l l -9, rl.i.0,. 2) $increases to the right from +&I Thus, along the equator ( B = 9/27 the other fundamental directions are &, ((l,?r/2,0) or (l,lr/Z,Zn)), PY(l,a/2,a/2), -&,(l,a/Z,a occurring a t both right and left equatorial extremes), and -&(l,n/2,3~/2). This scheme is somewhat different from the original cartographic form (31, in which equal areas are emphasized and which requires different scalings . of B and 4. In Figures 2-4 the Mollweide projections of the s to R spherit.aI harmonics are prrsented. In the figures, arras on the unit sphere that correspund to regions of positive amplitude d t h r functions are shaded. ' h e "kublc harmonic" 1131 , , forms ~-~~~~ are used for the f and g projections since these are required for the representation of the irreducible symmetries of the is an important example. An cubic point groups, of which 01, examination of Fieure 3. usine for comoarison earlier mesentations (13-15)"of tbe'compiicated f-iarmonic functibns, demonstrates the usefulness of the nroiection techniaue for . . the visualiz:ition of these three-dimensional distributions, and this i i further em~haaizedin Figure 4 wherein they k u b ~ c harmonics are for the-first time.2 Note that the Mollweide projections for theg(x4 y 4 z4) andg(2z' - y 4 - 2 4 ) functions have been idealized. There are slight distortions from circular in the nodal lines for these projections but these have been ignored in the drawing of Figure 4. ~~~

~~

~

~

~~

~

~

+ +

'

The aulhors are aware of only one previous use of these projections in the chemical literature. J. W. Linneti presenled the spherical hamwnic

solutions for the "particle-on-the-sphere" problem as Mollweide projections in his monograph on "Wave Mechanics and Valence Thewy" 1< 9.9) .-,.

The squared functionsin cross-section for the general subsets of

g and &spherical harmonics are to be found in various publications

Volume 61

Number 7 Julv 1984

569

d".

Figure 4. Mollweide projectionsfor Me *cubic harmonics on the unit sphere identified using the Muiiiken symbols for 4 irreducible representations and Bethe's notation. Note that in both Figures 3 and 4 there are repetitions of the ineducible representationsof Oh(T," and Tagfor example) f w which lower-order hamwnics (pard 4provide basis hmctions. In such casesue f-and ghamnnics are onhagonaiired to the lower order functions ( 12) and this is manifest, for example, in the f$ funnion by the conical nodes about the xaxes distinguishing this function from the p, harmonic.

Figure 2. Mollweide projections of the s-, p. and d-spherical harmonics on the unit sphere classifiedalso as basis functions for the irreducible symmetries of the point group 4.

Figure 5. (a) Ligand geometry (Xs) exhibiting Oh Symmetry in usual 3-D perspective. (b) Mollweide projection for this arrangement of six ligsnd atoms. The perspectiveham above the page is along the - x axis towards the coordinate origin; thus atom 4 appears in the center of the projection at the position -& IC) Suitable symbols for s- or powbitais at ligand positions. For sorbitals filied Circles correspond to positme orbital amplitude on the unit sphere about iigand positions: Open circles correspond to the contribution -1 times the sorbital amplitude about ligand positions. For pa-orbitals the symbol used denotes the plobe visible radially ham outside the sphere. Id) Suitable symbols for the plr-vertical set (a:) of ligand pwbitals: filied circles-positive amplitude: open circle-negative amplitude. (e) Suitable symbols for the plr hariroml set (sf) of ligand porbitals. Figure 3. Maliweide projectionsof the f-kubic harmonics ( 12)and their ciassification~for the irreducible symmetries of 4. The general and cubic sets of f-harmonics are identical in the cases f,s, fa+-pl and ,,,f and it is a useful exercise to compare these Projections with the earlier presentations of these general functions ( 13. 14). The remainingspecificallycubic linear combinations also are available for comparison in reference ( 15).B e W s ( 12)original notation is given in brackets.The projections are arbitrarily changed in sign to agree with referenceI15)where necessary, since it is customary to display the probability amplitude functions as positive about a posltive axis when this is convenient.

570

Journal of Chemical Education

Llgand Group Orbitals in Oh Symmetry The generation of LCAO approximations of molecular orbitals requires components of comparable energies to match in symmetry; the resultant molecular orbital energies can then he assessed in terms of both overlap considerations and the non-crossing rule for limited hnsis-set expansions. The symmetry-matrhing requirement then becomes straightforward

aqq 103 suiaqed ap!aralloM aql uo g ain%!j 30 suo!laa[oid a q l j o uo!q!soduc!iadns v yeq!qio d n o i - o d pue - s pueag 30 sasea aldtqs aqq i o j pqeiqsn[[! s! a n b q a a l a47 g a i n a ! ~UI '[[aqs leapaqds aql uo suo!pai!p [e!quaRuq pue [e!pei 0%Klleau puodsaiioa qaqm suo!lepa!io p p q i o xd p w 'od 's plm%![jo uoqquasaidai aqq 103 palsaaRns are qoqmAs [eiauaZ a[qel!ns a-ag ain%S u! uaq& 'suo~!sod puea!l aql au!q!iasu! aiaqds l!un aql i o j (qg 'hd) uo!?aatoid ap!ara[lom e se pue (eg .a!d) mioj [eariou u! pal!q!qxa s! luauc -aaueiie p u e q s!qq 30 Kiqamoaa aqq r; a i n a ! ~u~ .AqamurKs '0 Ruyrq~qxaainqaniqs e plalL 07 paRueiie spuea!l~oasea aql ~

aql Kq pai!nbai i a u w m aqq u! palua!io spp!~!prq asoql Kpo '1q!qio dnoiR put74!1 E u! '8u!qunoa Kq pau!elqo are KiqatuucKs alqepnsjo quauodaroa pw8!1 Bu!punoiins 'uo!fsod Ieiiuaa e inooe suiaiied aruouneu lealiauds alsea aui iox suoriaaloid

puffi!~-xd aql UOJ, sa!~laluwAs6 z ~pua "11

,a

'IBS lei!qm slal!qlo dnoJ6 pue6!1 .L am6!3

~~

iauueuc alqeldaaieun ue u! sauq a a ~ j i n ps p o u ssori q i y m sle~!qiopueB![ Ru!pnpxa PUB ainqanqs p p o u [lays-[aa!iaqds .'c'x&ztclq

Pue '@"*l-El*"%' S3!UOUlleq 163!leqds-~ aql qI!M pB181U"03Ua IS,!) S! UO $0hlawurAs "3 aql pal aql u!pau!eldxa se dals luanbasqns e se pau!elqo ale S U O ! I ~ U ! ~ W Mle~060q~10 pa1103 aq1 slewlo dnm6 od pue s 4% 'suo!~m!o>d a q l 6 am6!4 wl!a*l~ovuse sa!naruluAsuo!puni s!seqn3 pue63 ~euofioq~i+uou

' U O ! I ~ Jovm 3 s p m m aqo! awsod aql u! lua!qUeo>an!i!sode W!M P P ! ~ S S B S! ~ w a aql q l ! 1uauodu03 ~ od aqlleql UO!IUBAUO~eq101swlo)uo3 ua!leu!qluo3("11)od am IW axo~ 'sua!puw lelnwau pldepe LqeqsmluAs ewlda~dde aql q suo!lnq -!nu03 14!q10pue6!1-odese3 eua u! pue s do) slwqm dnol6 pue6!7 'g a>n6!4

spherical harmonics given in the earlier diagrams leads directly to the correct symmetry-adapted forms. In Figures 7 and 8 the simplicity and directness of the technique is emphasized by the construction of the more obscure pn-group orbitals, tl,, tz,, tzuand tl,, which involves the use of both the f - and g-harmonics projecttions. The results are produced by excluding component orbitals on ligands which do not match the local symmetry requirements of the particular central harmonic nodal structure as indicated on the appropriate diagrams. For Oh symmetry there is disagreement with the results of a conventional group theory projection operator analysis only in the case of the e, set of u-type group orbitals. This discrepancy arises because the Mollweide projections distinguish only the sign hut not the magnitude of the central function a t apwition on the unit sphere. The kubic harmonics of thed-set exhibitingE symmetry in Oh are chosen orthogonally on the hasis that atq - bx 2- cy2 and a'x2 - b ' y 2 involve coefficients whose sums are zero; thus the choice 2z2 - x 2 - y 2 and x y 2. The conventional result in the present case can he obtained by multiplying ligand orbital components by the magnitudes of the central functions a t the ligand positions. Alternatively, this result can he obtained using the nonorthogonal projections for the E, set given in Figure 9 based on z 2 - x 2 and z 2

572

Journal of Chemical Education

-

- y and then orthogonalizing hy taking sum and difference combinations as a subsequent step. This ~rocedurethen leads to the desired results 20; 2u6 0 2 - - u4 - us and 0 2 u4 - u3 - u5 for the e,-type u-group orhitals.

+

&

+

Literature Cited (1) Hq.fh;:,

D. K., Ruedenberg, K.. and Verkade. J. G., J. CHEM. Eouc. 54, 590

,.S#,,.

(2) Holfman, D. K., Ruedenberp, K., and Verke.de, J. G., Strurf. Rondig. 33.57 (1977). 13) McDonneli Jr. P. W., "Introduction to Map Making." Marcell Dckker, New York, 1111.

(4) Q " ~ < c . M., McKiernan, J. G., and Redmond, D. B., J. CHEM. EDUC., 56, 572 l19M). (5) Quinn, C. M., McKiernan, J . G..and Redmond, D. B., lnarg. Chem., 22,2310 (1983). 16) Redmond, 0.B..Quinn, C. M., and McKiernsn.J. G.. J. Chem Sac. Fareday Tram.

.

7 ,1. 9 1791 . .. ...114117, ,. .. . ,.

17) Stone,A. J., Mol. Phya.,41,1339I1980). (8) Stone,A. J.,lnorg. Chem.20.563 11981). 19) Quinn, C. M., McKiernan, J . G., and Redmond, D. B., to he published. 110) Ws1sh.A. D., J. Chem.Sor.,2260 11953). (11) Pearson, R. G.,"Symmetry Rules for Chemical Reactions." John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. 1976. (12) Bethe, H., Ann. der Physik, 3,133 11929). (13) Friedman, H.G.. Jr., Choppin, G. R., and Feuerbacher, D G.,J. CREM. EDuc. 41,354 119641.

(14) ~gk;