Subscriber access provided by GAZI UNIV
Article
Multi-scale structural changes of wheat and yam starches during cooking and their effect on in vitro enzymatic digestibility Shujun Wang, Shaokang Wang, Peng Guo, Lu Liu, and Shuo Wang J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b04272 • Publication Date (Web): 12 Dec 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on December 13, 2016
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Multi-scale structural changes of wheat and yam starches during
2
cooking and their effect on in vitro enzymatic digestibility
3 Shujun Wanga*, Shaokang Wanga, Peng Guoa, Lu Liua, Shuo Wangab*
4 5 6
a
Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Ministry of Education, College of Food
7
Engineering and Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457,
8
China
9
b
Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, Beijing Technology & Business University, Beijing 100048, China
10 11 12 13 14
* Corresponding authors: Dr. Shujun Wang or Dr. Shuo Wang
15
Mailing address: No 29, 13th Avenue, Tianjin Economic and Developmental Area (TEDA), Tianjin
16
300457, China
17
Phone: 86-22-60912486
18
E-mail address:
[email protected] or
[email protected] 19 20 21 22 1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
23
ABSTRACT
24
In the present study, the multi-scale structures and in vitro digestibility of wheat and
25
yam starches with different water contents after heating at 100 oC were investigated.
26
After heating for the same time, the degree of gelatinization of both starches increased
27
with increasing water content, followed by the gradual disruption of multi-scale
28
structures of starch granules. At a water content of 37% for wheat and 46% for yam
29
starch, both starches were almost gelatinized completely after heating for 5 min at 100
30
o
31
especially at a water content of above 28%. It is interesting to note that extending heat
32
treatment did not further disrupt the multi-scale structures nor increase the in vitro
33
enzymatic digestibility of both starches with the same water content. In contrast to
34
wheat starch, yam starch showed a higher resistance to heat treatment. From this study,
35
we can conclude that water content plays a more important role in determining the
36
gelatinization behavior and in vitro enzymatic digestibility of starch than the duration
37
of heating.
C. Heat treatment increased greatly in vitro enzymatic digestibility of both starches,
38 39 40
Keywords: starch; water content; duration of heating; multi-scale structure;
41
gelatinization; in vitro enzymatic digestibility
42 43 44 2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 36
Page 3 of 36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
45
INTRODUCTION
46
Starch is the main component of many foods and the source of glycemic
47
carbohydrates in the human diet. The rate of digestion and absorption of starch is
48
determined by the state of starch in foods and has a relationship to major
49
nutrition-related health problems.1,2 Starch is a heterogeneous polymer which contains
50
amylose and amylopectin. Amylose is mainly made up of the linear α-1,4-D-glucan
51
chains connected with a small number of branched chains by α-1,6-glycosidic bond.
52
Amylopectin is a moderately branched macromolecule composed of backbone chains
53
and side chains that are linked by an average of 5% of α-1,6-glucosidic bonds.
54
Amylose and amylopectin make up approximately 98-99% dry weight of starch.3-6
55
Native starch has a very complex hierarchical structure, ranging in scale from nano- to
56
micrometer, including glucose units, double helices, crystalline and amorphous
57
lamellae, super helices, blocklets, growth rings and intact granules. Each of the
58
structural units plays an important role in determining starch functionality that relates
59
to food processing and digestion.7
60 61
During heating in the presence of water, starch undergoes a series of sequential phase
62
transitions, including glass transition, gelatinization, and/or melting transition.2,8 The
63
multi-scale structures of starch granules are disrupted during cooking or processing,
64
and the degree of disruption is dependent on water content, heating temperature and
65
length. Gelatinization increases the susceptibility of starch to enzymatic digestion.9-13
66
The relationship between degree of gelatinization and starch digestibility has been 3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
67
well studied, mostly on starch systems with high moisture contents.11, 14-16 Most starch
68
in food is cooked or processed with limited water (ratio of water:starch < 2:1, w/w),17,
69
18
70
multi-scale structures. Up to now, there is little information on the changes that starch
71
undergoes during thermal processing under water-limited conditions and how these
72
changes influence the susceptibility of starch to enzymic hydrolysis. While the effect
73
of heat-moisture treatment on physicochemical properties of starch has been studied
74
extensively, these studies mainly aim to improving the functionality of
75
hydrothermally-modified starch. 19, 20
which results in partial gelatinization of starch and incomplete disruption of
76 77
Understanding the effect of cooking or processing parameters on starch digestibility is
78
of great importance for optimization of food processing to manipulate starch
79
digestibility in foods.2 Under water limited conditions, starch is not always fully
80
gelatinized, which increases the complexity of understanding starch digestibility in
81
terms of the extent of structural changes induced by processing. In the present study,
82
the effects of water content (19 to 64%, wt%) and duration of heating at 100 oC on
83
gelatinization behavior and in vitro enzymatic digestibility of wheat and yam starches
84
were examined. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the
85
changes of multi-scale structures and in vitro enzymatic digestibility of starches
86
during heating at 100 oC over such a wide range of water content.
87 88
MATERIALS AND METHODS 4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 36
Page 5 of 36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
89
Materials. The grains of hard winter wheat were provided by Lixiahe Agricultural
90
Research Institute, Jiangsu Province, China. Yam tubers were purchased from local
91
market in Tianjin, China. Native wheat starch (NWS) and yam starch (NYS) were
92
isolated from wheat grains and yam tubers according to the method of Wang, Wang,
93
Zhang, Li, Yu, and Wang21 and Ek, Wang, Copeland and Brand-Miller.22 The amylose
94
contents of NWS and NYS, as determined by the method of Chrastil,23 were 27.7 and
95
37.1%, respectively. The moisture content of both starches was about 10%. Glucose
96
oxidase/peroxidase kit (GOPOD format) and Aspergillus niger amyloglucosidase
97
(3260U/mL) were purchased from Megazyme International Ireland Ltd. (Bray Co.,
98
Wicklow, Ireland). α-Amylase (Sigma, EC3.2.1.1, type VI-B from porcine pancreas,
99
13 U/mg) was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). All other
100
chemical reagents were of analytical grade.
101 102
Heat treatment of starch-water mixtures. Unlike common heat-moisture treatment,
103
which is often conducted by heating starch-water mixtures in a sealed glass container
104
using an oven,24 heat treatment of starch-water mixtures in the present study was
105
performed as follows. Wheat and yam starches (5 g) were weighed exactly into a
106
polypropylene bag, and a certain amount of distilled water was added to obtain water
107
contents of 19%, 28%, 37%, 46%, 55%, and 64% (w/v, dry weight basis). The starch
108
samples were mixed thoroughly during the addition of water. The bags were sealed
109
and allowed to stand at room temperature for 2 h before heating in a boiling water
110
bath for 5 min, 10 min, 20 min and 30 min. As a control, both native starches were 5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 6 of 36
111
placed in the bags and hermetically heated in the same way. After heating, the samples
112
were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen for about 10 min, freeze-dried, ground into
113
a powder and passed through a 100 µm sieve. As there were no significant differences
114
in structural properties and in vitro enzymatic digestibility between native starch and
115
control samples, only the data for native starch are presented. The samples in the
116
figures were named as NWS (NYS)-water content (%)-heating time (min), which
117
means that native wheat or yam starch with the specified water contents was heated at
118
100 oC for the times indicated.
119 120
Differential scanning calorimetry. Thermal properties of starch samples were
121
analyzed using a differential scanning calorimeter (200 F3, Netzsch, Germany)
122
equipped with a thermal analysis data station. Approximately 3 mg of starch samples
123
were weighed accurately into 40 µL aluminum pans. Distilled water was added with a
124
pipette to obtain a starch: water ratio of 1:5 (w/v) in the DSC pans according to a
125
method described previously.6 The pans were sealed and allowed to stand at room
126
temperature for 12 h before DSC analysis. The pans were heated from 20 to 100 oC at
127
a heating rate of 10 oC /min. An empty aluminum pan was used as the reference. All
128
measurements were performed in triplicate. The degree of gelatinization (DG) of each
129
sample was calculated according to the formula:13, 25
130
DG (%) = (1 −∆H heated starch/∆H native starch) ×100
131
where ∆H
132
enthalpy change of native starch.
heated starch
is the enthalpy change of heated starch, ∆H
6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
native starch
is the
Page 7 of 36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
133 134
Attenuated
Total
Reflectance-Fourier
transform
infrared
(ATR-FTIR)
135
spectroscopy. The short-range molecular order of double helices in starch was
136
determined using a Thermo Scientific Nicolet IS50 FTIR spectrometer (Thermo
137
Fisher Scientific, USA). Starch (150 mg) was pressed into round tablets and scanned
138
between 4000 and 400 cm-1. The spectra were obtained at a resolution of 4 cm-1 with
139
an accumulation of 32 scans against air as the background. The FTIR spectra were
140
baseline-corrected automatically by OMNIC 8.0 and deconvoluted from 1200 to
141
800cm-1 with a half-bandwidth of 19 cm-1 and an enhancement factor of 1.9. The
142
ratios of absorbances at 1047/1022 cm-1 were obtained to estimate the short-range
143
ordered structure of starch. 26
144 145
Laser confocal micro-Raman (LCM-Raman) spectroscopy. Raman spectra were
146
obtained using a Renishaw Invia Raman microscope
147
Gloucestershire, United Kingdom) equipped with a Leica microscope (Leica
148
Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and a 785 nm green diode laser source was used. The
149
Raman system was calibrated with a silicon semiconductor using the Raman peak at
150
520 cm−1. The spectra from 4000 to 400 cm-1 were collected from at least five
151
different spots with a resolution of approximately 7 cm-1. The full width at half
152
maximum (FWHM) of the band at 480 cm-1 was obtained using the software of WIRE
153
2.0, which is usually used to characterize the change of molecular order during
154
gelatinization or retrogradation.7, 27 7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
system (Renishaw,
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
155 156
X-ray diffraction. X-ray diffraction analysis was performed using a Bruker D8 Focus
157
X-ray diffractometer (Bruker AXS, Germany) operating at 40 kV and 40 mA with Cu
158
Kα radiation (λ=0.154 nm). Starch samples were equilibrated over a saturated NaCl
159
solution at room temperature for one week before analysis. The X-ray diffraction
160
pattern was obtained from 4° to 35° (2θ) at a scanning speed of 1°/min and a step size
161
of 0.02°. The relative crystallinity was quantified as the ratio of the crystalline area to
162
the total area between 4o and 35o (2θ) using the Origin software (Version 8.0,
163
Microcal Inc., Northampton, MA, USA).
164 165
Field-emission scanning electron microscopy. The freeze-dried samples were
166
mounted on a stub with double-sided adhesive tapes, sputter-coated with gold before
167
imaging using a field-emission scanning electron microscope (1530, LEO, Germany).
168
An accelerating voltage of 5 kV was used during imaging.
169 170
In vitro starch digestion. In vitro enzymic digestion of starch was determined
171
according to the method described elsewhere.28 At specified time points during
172
digestion (from 0 min to 120 min), an aliquot (0.05 mL) of the hydrolysate was
173
withdrawn and mixed with 0.95 mL of 95% ethanol to deactivate the enzymes. The
174
amount of glucose released in the digestion solution was measured using the
175
Meagazyme GOPOD kit. The percentage of hydrolysed starch was calculated by
176
multiplying the glucose content with a factor of 0.9. The starch digestograms were 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 36
Page 9 of 36
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
177
obtained by plotting the percentage of starch digestion as a function of hydrolysis
178
time.
179 180
Statistical analysis. All analyses were performed at least in triplicate and the results
181
are reported as the mean values and standard deviations. One way analysis of variance
182
(ANOVA) followed by post-hoc Duncan’s multiple range tests (p