Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes-Based

Institute of Physics, Sachivalaya Marg, Bhubaneswar-751005, Odisha, India. Energy Fuels , 2016, 30 (5), pp 4244–4250. DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6...
4 downloads 11 Views 3MB Size
Subscriber access provided by Weizmann Institute of Science

Article

Layered double hydroxides/multi-walled carbon nanotubes– based composite for high temperature CO adsorption 2

Lakshminarayana Kudinalli Gopalakrishna Bhatta, Seetharamu Subramanyam, Chengala D. Madhusoodana, Umananda Manjunatha Bhatta, Puspendu Guha, Raghavendra Prasad Havenje Dinakar, and Krishna Venkatesh Energy Fuels, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b00141 • Publication Date (Web): 07 Apr 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on April 7, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Energy & Fuels is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 23

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

1

Layered Double Hydroxides/Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes–Based Composite for High

2

Temperature CO2 Adsorption

3

Lakshminarayana Kudinalli Gopalakrishna Bhatta,

4

Madhusoodana D Chengala, Umananda Manjunatha Bhatta, Puspendu Guha, Raghavendra

5

Prasad Havenje Dinakar, Krishna Venkatesh

6 7 8 9 10

∗,†

§







Seetharamu Subramanyam, †

£



Centre for Emerging Technologies, Jain University, Ramangaram District-562 112, Karnataka,

India ‡

§

£

Central Power Research Institute, Sir C. V. Raman Road, Bangalore-560 080, India Ceramic Technological Institute, BHEL, Bangalore-560 012, India Institute of Physics, Sachivalaya Marg, Bhubaneswar-751005, Odisha, India

11

ABSTRACT: Layered double hydroxides (LDH) derived mixed metal oxides (MMO) are

12

considered as promising solid sorbents for CO2 capture in the temperatures range of 350–500 °C.

13

Accordingly, they find potential applications in the sorption enhanced water–gas shift (SEWGS)

14

process and in removal of CO2 from hot flue gas/syngas. Numerous strategies have been

15

explored to improve the CO2 capture property of LDH-derived MMO under the conditions of

16

intended applications. These strategies include novel sorbents by replacement of cations and

17

intercalation of organic anions on Mg–Al LDH, development of LDH based hybrid/composite

18

materials, optimization of synthesis conditions to control particle size, and method development

19

for different types of alkali impregnation. The present work involves synthesis of Mg–Al

20

LDH/multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) composite and explores its applicability for CO2

21

capture under dry conditions. Additionally, K2CO3 is impregnated onto the composite to study 1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 2 of 23

22

the effect of alkali promotion. The K2CO3-promoted Mg–Al LDH/MWNT composite exhibited a

23

fresh adsorption capacity of 1.12 mmol g-1 at 300 °C under a total pressure of 1 bar. The

24

enhanced CO2 sorption capacity of composites in comparison with their pristine counterparts can

25

be attributed to improved particle dispersion. Further, K2CO3-promoted Mg–Al LDH/MWNT

26

composite shows an average working capacity of 0.81 mmol g-1 over 10 cycles in the

27

temperature range of 300 – 400 °C. The deactivation model provides excellent predictions of the

28

experimental CO2 breakthrough curves obtained with various sorbents. The values of model

29

parameters are comparable with those reported in literature.

30

1. INTRODUCTION

31

Climate change due to anthropogenic emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs) is a major global

32

challenge of the present time. The surmised consequences of climate change such as extreme

33

weather events, ecosystem degradation, and species extinctions have compelled the humankind

34

to explore various GHG mitigation strategies. Among the many GHG mitigation strategies

35

explored so far, the carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) technology is considered as a mid-

36

term commercially viable option due to the fact that the fossil fuels will continue to be a major

37

source of energy in foreseeable future. This technology mainly consists of three steps; CO2

38

capture, transportation, and utilization/storage. Among these, CO2 capture is very expensive and

39

hence considered as the most critical one. Absorption, membranes, cryogenic distillation

40

systems, and adsorption are the four prominent techniques that are in either use or under

41

development for CO2 separation and capture. Among these techniques, adsorption of CO2 on

42

solid sorbents has been widely investigated as a means of an alternative to benchmark absorption

43

technology, which is having many challenges.1 The increased research interest in solid sorbents

44

can be noticed from the fact that there have been nearly more than 1500 new publications in this

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 23

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

45

area from the year 2011 to 2014. The numerous classes of CO2 solid sorbents that have been

46

reported in literature include zeolites, carbon based sorbents, metal organic frameworks (MOFs),

47

metal oxides, and alkaline ceramics. Further, the derivatives, hybrids, and composites of these

48

materials have also been investigated for enhanced CO2 capture.2 However, each of these

49

materials presents its own intrinsic limitations, stipulating the strong need for the development of

50

robust adsorbents that are capable of working under industrial relevant conditions.3

51

The layered double hydroxides (LDHs), also known as hydrotalcites, are anionic basic clays,

52

represented by the general formula (M12−+x M3x+ (OH)2 ) •(Anx −n mH2O ) ; where M2+ = Mg2+, Ni2+,

53

Zn2+, Cu2+, or Mn2+; M3+ = Al3+, Fe3+, or Cr3+; An- = CO32 -, SO42-, NO3-, Cl- , or OH-, and x = 0.1

54

- 0.5.4,5 Among numerous types of LDHs, the Mg–Al CO3 has been extensively investigated for

55

CO2 capture. It is widely accepted that LDHs as such do not exhibit any CO2 adsorption capacity

56

due to poor basicity and the presence of entities that hinder CO2 adsorption. Upon thermal

57

treatment, they are transformed into nearly amorphous metastable mixed metal oxides (MMO)

58

with a poorly defined 3D network. These LDH-derived MMO are known to adsorb CO2 at

59

temperatures in the range of 350–500 °C and accordingly, identified as intermediate-temperature

60

CO2 sorbents. Consequently, several investigations have demonstrated their applicability in the

61

sorption enhanced water–gas shift (SEWGS) process for effective CO2 capture. They also find

62

potential application in removal of CO2 from hot flue gas/syngas.6 In general, LDH-derived

63

MMO present several advantages such as high CO2/N2 selectivity, easy regenerability, good

64

hydrothermal stability, compatibility with SER catalysts, cost-effectiveness compared with

65

lithium ceramics, and fast kinetics. The demerits of this sorbent system include low adsorption

66

capacity (particularly at low CO2 partial pressure), low kinetics in comparison with

67

physisorbents and poor mechanical stability during multicycle adsorption-desorption process.7

x+

x−

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

68

Hence, in order to improve the performance of LDH-derived MMO under the conditions of

69

intended applications, several strategies have been explored since the last two decades. Such

70

efforts of current research can be summarized into following aspects: (1) novel sorbents by

71

replacement of cations and intercalation of organic anions on Mg–Al LDH, (2) development of

72

LDH based hybrid/composite materials, (3) optimization of synthesis conditions to control

73

particle size, (4) method development for different types of alkali impregnation, and (5) further

74

investigation on CO2 adsorption mechanism.7,8

75

In the current work, adsorption of CO2 on Mg–Al LDH/multi-walled carbon nanotubes

76

(MWNTs) composite has been investigated using a laboratory scale fixed bed reactor.

77

Additionally, K2CO3 is impregnated onto the composite to study the effect of alkali promotion.

78

In this regard, the following samples were synthesized and characterized using different

79

techniques: neat Mg−Al LDH (MO), K2CO3-promoted Mg−Al LDH (KMO), Mg–Al

80

LDH/MWNT composite (MOC), and K2CO3-promoted Mg–Al LDH/MWNT composite

81

(KMOC).

82

2. EXPERIMENTAL

83

2.1. Materials. The chemicals used in this work were of analytical reagent (AR) grade and

84

purchased from SD Fine-Chem Ltd. (India), except for aluminium nitrate nonahydrate, which

85

was purchased from Merck (India). Long, CVD-grown, multi-walled carbon nanotubes

86

(MWNTs) were procured from an Egyptian petroleum research institute (Egypt). Polycarbonate

87

membranes were from Millipore (HTTP Isopore membrane). Double distilled water was used

88

throughout the study.

89 90

Page 4 of 23

2.2. Synthesis of MO. The neat Mg–Al LDH with a Mg/Al atomic ratio of 1:1 was synthesized using the co-precipitation at low supersaturation method. In order to obtain about 4.0

4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 23

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

91

g of sample, 5.75 g of Mg(NO3)2·6H2O and 8.4 g of Al(NO3)3·9H2O were dissolved in 22.5 ml

92

of water. Dropwise addition of this solution to an aqueous solution (15 ml) containing 4.24 g of

93

Na2CO3 and simultaneous dropwise addition of another aqueous solution (17 ml) containing 6.4

94

g of NaOH resulted in white gelatinous precipitate. During addition, the pH of resulting solution

95

was continuously monitored using pH meter (Systronics, µ pH 361) and kept in the range of 10

96

to 12. After aging the mixture at room temperature for 24 h with continuous stirring, the

97

precipitate was separated by high-speed centrifugation and washed with water until the pH value

98

reduced to 7. Finally, the sample was dried overnight at 120 °C and then calcined at 400 °C in air

99

for 5 h to obtain mixed metal oxides.

100

2.3. Oxidation of MWNTs. About 100 mg of MWNTs was dispersed in 20 ml of a 3:1

101

mixture of concentrated H2SO4/HNO3 and sonicated for 30 min at room temperature. The

102

mixture was stirred for 2 h at 60 °C, diluted with water, and cooled to room temperature.9 The

103

mixture was then filtered using 0.4 µm polycarbonate membranes and washed with 200 ml of

104

0.01 M NaOH. Finally, it was washed with water until the pH value reduced to neutral.

105

2.4. Synthesis of MOC. In order to synthesize LDH/MWNT composite containing 70 wt%

106

of LDH, 1.68 g of MWNTs was dispersed in an aqueous solution (32 ml) containing 6.4 g of

107

NaOH and 4.24 g of Na2CO3 using ultrasonic liquid processor (Johson Plastosonic Pvt. Ltd). To

108

this mixture, was added another aqueous solution (22.5 ml) containing 5.75 g of

109

Mg(NO3)2·6H2O and 8.4 g of Al(NO3)3·9H2O. The resulting black suspension was aged at 60 °C

110

for 12 h under vigorous stirring. The precipitate was then separated by high-speed centrifugation

111

and washed with water until the pH value reduced to 7. The sample was dried at 120 °C and then

112

calcined at 400 °C under inert N2 atmosphere.

5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

113

Page 6 of 23

2.5. Synthesis of KMO and KMOC. Impregnation of nominal 20 wt% of K2CO3 onto MO

114

was achieved by employing an incipient wetness method. An aqueous solution (15 ml)

115

containing 1.0 g of K2CO3 was added to 5.0 g of MO to the point of incipient wetness. Decanting

116

the excess liquid after 1 h, the resulting paste was dried at 120 °C for 16 h, followed by

117

calcination at 400 °C for 4 h. The KMOC was synthesized in an analogous manner, but using

118

MOC instead of MO and calcining the sample under inert N2 atmosphere.

119

2.6. Characterization. The textural properties of samples were evaluated from N2

120

adsorption–desorption isotherms obtained at 77 K with a NOVA 1000 Quanta Chrome high-

121

speed gas sorption analyzer. Prior to the measurement, the samples were outgassed at 523 K for

122

several hours. The specific surface areas (SSA) were calculated using Brunauer–Emmett–Teller

123

(BET) relation applied to the adsorption branch of the isotherms in the range of relative

124

pressures: 0.05–0.3. The total pore volume and their size distribution (PSD) were obtained by

125

applying the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) analysis to the isotherm desorption branch.

126

Powdered X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns were recorded using Panalytical Xpertpro X-ray

127

diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.154 nm) in 2θ range 5o to 90o at 40 kV and a scanning

128

rate of 2 min-1. The surface morphology of samples was analyzed using scanning electron

129

microscope (SEM) images obtained on a Carl Zeiss, Neon 40 FESEM instrument. High-

130

resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images were obtained on a FEI Tecnai

131

T20; operating at 200 keV equipped with EDAX EDS. EDX was used to identify the elemental

132

composition of samples.

133

2.7. CO2 adsorption measurement. A fixed-bed reactor (SS, 320 mm length, 10 mm

134

internal diameter) was employed to perform the CO2 adsorption/desorption experiments. While

135

adsorption was carried out at 300 °C, desorption proceeded at 400 °C. The reactor was loaded

6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 23

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

136

with a known quantity of calcined sample (~ 2.0 g) and positioned vertically inside in an electric

137

furnace. The reactor is equipped with a K-type thermocouple for monitoring bed temperature and

138

two pressure transducers; one at entrance and another at the exit of reactor. Both adsorption and

139

desorption were performed at atmospheric pressure. The pressure drop across the bed was found

140

to be negligible for all samples during the experiment. Prior to adsorption, the loaded sample was

141

pre-treated at 400 °C for 1 h under helium flow (30 ml min-1) and cooled to 300 °C. A gas

142

mixture of 10% CO2 balanced by helium was passed through the bed at a flow rate of 20 ml min-

143

1

144

and a portion of that gas was fed to gas chromatograph (Mayura, 1100) equipped with a thermal

145

conductivity detector and a porapak Q column. The breakthrough capacity (qBT) and saturation

146

adsorption capacity (qSA) of sample were evaluated using the data of CO2 concentration at exit,

147

obtained from integrating the gas chromatograph peak area with necessary corrections for blank

148

experiment. After attaining saturation, the sample was flushed with helium at a rate of 30 ml min-

149

1

150

estimate multicycle stability for selected samples. The experiment was repeated at least twice for

151

first adsorption capacity to ascertain reproducibility of results.

152

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

153

. Subsequently, the column effluent was cooled to near-ambient temperature in a heat exchanger

for 1 h followed by desorption at 400 °C. The adsorption and desorption were continued to

3.1. Synthesis of sorbents. MWNTs were functionalized using acid treatment in order to

154

improve the purity and the solubility in water. Subsequent treatment with NaOH converts

155

carboxylated carbonaceous fragments resulted from oxidation of MWNTs into their conjugate

156

salts. Finally, the water washing removes other impurities leaving carboxylate sites on the

157

MWNTs, which will increase the compatibility with LDH deposition.10 All the adsorbents were

158

calcined at 400 °C under air/N2 atmosphere prior to adsorption as this temperature had been

7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 8 of 23

159

reported to be optimal for calcination of Mg−Al LDH.11–13 Alkali metal carbonates have been

160

mainly used to improve the CO2 capture properties of different types of sorbents, including

161

LDH-derived MMO, MgO, CaO, and alkaline ceramics. Potassium carbonate scores over other

162

alkali metal carbonates as promoter in terms of thermodynamic/kinetic factors.14 It is reported

163

that ~ 20 wt% of K2CO3 loading increases the sorption capacity of HTlcs due to an increase in

164

the number of active sites on surface, despite reduction in surface area and pore volume.15–17 The

165

exact mechanism of CO2 adsorption on LDH-derived MMO and optimal Mg/Al atomic ratio still

166

remain unclear. Additionally, the Mg/Al atomic ratio of tested LDHs has been in the range of 1

167

to 3.7,17–21 Investigating the MWNTs supported LDH with Mg/Al atomic ratio of 2:1, Garcia-

168

Gallastegui et al.10 found that use of a MWNT support improved the absolute capacity and cycle

169

stability of the hybrid adsorbent under dry conditions. The ionic interaction between the base-

170

washed, negatively-charged, oxidized, MWNTs and positively-charged LDH platelets resulted in

171

successful synthesis of hybrid. The optimum loading of MWNTs was in the range of 35 to 50

172

wt%. However, the presence of large amount of inert material in sorbent could increase the bed

173

volume due to low weight fraction of active material, leading to higher capital and operating

174

costs.2 In the light of these aspects, 20 wt% K2CO3 promoted 30 wt% MWNTs supported LDH

175

with Mg/Al atomic ratio of 1:1 was selected for the present study.

176

3.2. Characterization. Figure 1 shows N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of samples. In all

177

cases, isotherms correspond to type IV of IUPAC classification of physisorption isotherms.

178

Isotherm of this type is characteristic of mesoporous material with strong adsorbent-adsorbate

179

interaction. The isotherm shows distinct hysteresis at higher values of P/P0, which is associated

180

with capillary condensation taking place in mesopores. The hysteresis is closest in shape to the

181

H3 type, corresponding to aggregates of plate-like particles giving rise to slit-shaped pores.

8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 23

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

182

While the absence of knee implies negligible micropore volume, the steep rise in the adsorbed

183

volume of nitrogen at a relative pressure > 0.7 implies the broad pore size distribution.22 The

184

volume adsorbed was much higher after supporting with MWNTs, indicating a higher total

185

surface area. The SSA, BHJ pore diameter, and pore volume of adsorbents as well as MWNTs

186

are presented in Table 1. The SSAs and pore volumes of MOC and KMOC were significantly

187

lower than those of MWNTs. This can be attributed to effective loading of LDH-derived MMO

188

onto the MWNTs surface. As expected, K2CO3 impregnation (KMO) resulted in the reductions

189

of SSA and pore volume of MO due to blocking of pores. The pore size distributions (Figure 2)

190

show similar distribution shape and modal pore-size values. Additionally, the average pore

191

diameter (varied from 7.1 nm to 11.8 nm) of adsorbents indicates that pore diffusion should not

192

be the rate-determining step for the subsequent CO2 adsorption.23

193 194

Figure 1. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms at 77 K 9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 10 of 23

195

196 197

Figure 2. Pore size distribution of adsorbents from BJH method

198

The PXRD spectra of samples are shown in Figure 3. The reflection peak at 26o and 42o in the

199

MWNTs sample are indexed to the (002) and (001) planes of graphitic carbon, respectively

200

(JCPDS 23-0064). The broad peak reflections at ∼ 37°, 43°, and 62° for MO and KMO

201

correspond to diffractions of periclase MgO from (111), (200), and (220) planes, respectively

202

(JCPDS 43-1022), indicating smaller crystallite size of periclase phase. The spectra of MOC and

203

KMOC predominantly display the diffraction pattern of MWNTs since it was the base material.7

204

However, the more broadened characteristic peaks of LDH-derived MMO appeared in some

205

angle ranges, indicating a good dispersion of MMO phase on MWNTs support.24,25

10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 11 of 23

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

206 207

Figure 3. PXRD diffraction patterns of adsorbents and MWNTs

208

The electron microscope images of samples are shown in Figure 4. The surface of MO (Figure

209

4a and 4c) appears to be highly porous with loosely connected nanostructures (10s and 100s of

210

nm), resulting in inter particle voids. The SEM image of KMO (Figure 4b) shows flatter

211

morpholgy, which is complemented by TEM image (Figure 4d). The image shows no

212

interparticle voids but for a few light patches in between resulting from K2CO3 impregnation.

213

This observation supports the results of N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm, in which reduction in

214

SSA and pore volume was observed upon K2CO3 impregnation (Table 1). The TEM images of

215

MOC and KMOC (Figure 4e and 4f) show MMO nano structures/clusters embedded in MWNTs

216

network. Magnified images of MOC (Figure 5(a) and (b)) and KMOC (Figure 5(c) and (d)) show

217

isolated MO particles/fragments attached to MWNTs. The EDX analysis confirmed the presence

218

of Mg and Al in all samples. The presence of potassium in K2CO3-promoted samples and the

219

presence of carbon in MWNTs-supported samples are also confirmed.

220 221 222 11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 12 of 23

223 224

Figure 4. SEM micrographs of (a) MO, (b) KMO; TEM micrographs of (c) MO, (d) KMO, (e)

225

MOC, and (f) KMOC

226

12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 13 of 23

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

227 228

Figure 5. Magnified TEM images of MOC (a and b) showing small cluster of MO particles attached to MWNTs and larger fragments of KMO attached to MWNTS (c and d)

229

3.3. CO2 sorption results. In order to determine the adsorption capacities of synthesized

230

adsorbents, the dynamic column breakthrough (DCB) method was employed. This provides a

231

laboratory-based adsorption experiment that can more closely match the conditions in an

232

industrial-scale gas separation process than achievable with static adsorption experiments. The

233

DCB method is more practical, representing the material characteristic in a packed bed under

234

flow system. The representative dynamic adsorption data are particularly valuable to the gas

235

separation by means of methods like pressure swing adsorption (PSA), vacuum swing adsorption

236

(VSA), or temperature swing adsorption (TSA). Consequently, the data produced with the DCB

237

method improve the prospects for reliable scale-up of the adsorption technology with an

238

assessment of overall energy requirements of a cyclic operation. It is a necessary step towards

239

the process development as it provides information about the macroscopic performance of the

240

adsorption column.26–28 The amount of CO2 adsorbed on an adsorbent (q, mmol g-1) at a certain

241

time (t, min) has been estimated using the relation (1) after making necessary corrections for

242

blank run

243

q=

244

Where W = the weight of adsorbent (g); Q = the feed flow rate (normal ml min-1); Cin = the

245

influent (vol%); and Cout = the effluent CO2 concentrations (vol%). Integrating the equation 1

246

from t = 0 to breakthrough time when Cout reaches 10% of Cin gives the breakthrough capacity of

247

adsorbent (qBT)29,30, while integrating the equation from t = 0 to saturation time (ts) when Cout

248

reaches Cin gives the saturation capacity of adsorbent (qSA). The integral term in eq. 1 can be

249

easily obtained by a graphical method. Figure 6 shows the experimental CO2 breakthrough

t

Q Cin C ( 1 − out ) dt ∫ W × 22.4 0 Cin

( 1)

13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 14 of 23

250

curves obtained with adsorbents at 300 °C, 1 bar. The breakthrough time is longest for KMOC,

251

indicating highest sorption capacity since the breakthrough time is proportional to sorption

252

capacity provided adsorption temperature and sorbent quantity were normalized. The efficiency

253

of adsorption process depends on the overall dynamics of the fixed-bed reactor wherein mass

254

transfer resistances play an important role. The width and shape of mass-transfer zone depend on

255

the adsorption isotherm, flow rate, mass-transfer rate to the particles, and diffusion in the pores.

256

For a narrow mass-transfer zone, the breakthrough curve is very steep and most of the bed

257

capacity is used at the break point. In a typical fixed-bed reactor, the efficiency of adsorption

258

process is determined by the overall dynamics of the system, in which mass transfer resistances

259

are important. The mass-transfer zone width and shape depends on the adsorption isotherm, flow

260

rate, mass-transfer rate to the particles, and diffusion in the pores. For a narrow mass-transfer

261

zone, the breakthrough curve is very steep and most of the bed capacity is used at the break

262

point. In the present study, the curves show steep shape at the breakthrough times, indicating

263

narrow mass-transfer zone and no diffussional constraints.

264 265

Figure 6. Experimental CO2 breakthrough curves obtained with adsorbents at 300 °C, 1 bar

14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 15 of 23

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

266

The adsorption capacities of adsorbents, presented in Table 2, follow the order KMOC > MOC >

267

KMO > MO. The CO2 adsorption capacity of pristine MWNTs was found to be negligible. If

268

specific adsorption capacity (adsorption capacity per mass of LDH) is considered the increase in

269

capacity would be much more. However, adsorption capacity per mass of total adsorbent is a

270

more meaningful metric for practical applications. The enhanced capacities of LDH/MWNT

271

composites can be attributed to better contact between gas and surface of active material due to

272

improved particle dispersion. The improved dispersion of LDH is evident from characterization

273

results. As expected, the positive effect of K2CO3 impregnation on adsorption capacity is also

274

evident from the data. The increase in the sorption capacity of KMO compared with MO can be

275

ascribed to an increase in the number of active sites on surface, despite reduction in surface area

276

and pore volume (Table 1). However, the TEM images of MOC and KMOC (Figure 4e and 4f)

277

show predominantly MWNTs, which is also evident from sharp rise in C peak from the

278

corresponding EDX spectra. Hence, it can be reasonably deciphered that the optimal loading of

279

MWNTs might not be 30 wt% for LDH with Mg/Al atomic ratio of 1:1, providing scope for

280

future work.

281

3.4. Deactivation model for breakthrough analysis. The adsorption of CO2 on materials

282

investigated in the present study can be considered as a non-catalytic heterogeneous gas–solid

283

reaction.31,32 This type of reaction typically involves number of steps, including diffusion of CO2

284

molecules into surface and pores, chemisorption onto active sites, and consequent formation of

285

carbonate product layer. Subsequently, this product layer offers resistance to further diffusion of

286

CO2 molecules. One can also expect changes in pore structure, active surface area, and active site

287

distribution during the course of reaction. All these changes result in decrease in the activity of

288

the adsorbent with respect to time. Several studies have shown that the deactivation model can be

15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 16 of 23

289

successfully applied to non-catalytic heterogeneous gas–solid reaction to obtain kinetic

290

parameters.33–35 This model provides a better description of reaction kinetics in comparison with

291

other proposed models such as shrinking-core model and the homogeneous model.36 In the

292

deactivation model, a single activity term ‘a’ is employed to denote the decrease in reactivity and

293

textural changes of adsorbent with the reaction extent.

294

Among different forms of deactivation model, the one proposed by Yasyerli et al.37 has been

295

found to be more realistic since the model was modified to include the concentration dependence

296

of the deactivation term.38 According to this model, considering the pseudo steady state

297

assumption and neglecting the axial dispersion term, species conservation equation for the

298

packed column and the rate of change of activity of the solid reactant (a) can be expressed using

299

relations 2 and 3, respectively. dC A − ko a C A = 0 dW da − = kd C A a dt −Q

300

(2) (3)

301

Using an iterative procedure, the following approximate expression was obtained for the

302

breakthrough curve.

303

   ko W  1 − exp ( − kd t ) )   exp ( − kd t )  (  1 − exp  CA    Q  = exp    C Ao 1 − exp ( − kd t )       

304

Where a = the activity of the solid sorbent, CA = effluent CO2 concentrations (vol%), CAo =

305

influent CO2 concentrations (vol%), Q = volumetric flow rate (cm3 min-1), ko = initial sorption

306

rate constant (cm3 min-1 g-1), kd = deactivation rate constant (min-1), W = weight of solid sorbent

307

(g), and t = time (min).

(4)

16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 17 of 23

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

308

The iterative non-linear least squares regression analysis of experimental breakthrough data of all

309

studied sorbents showed an excellent agreement with eq. 4. The model parameters along with

310

correlation coefficients are reported in Table 2. While the deactivation rate constant (kd) was

311

found to be highest for MO, KMOC exhibited highest value of initial sorption rate constant (ko).

312

The values of rate parameters for all adsorbents were found to be consistent with their adsorption

313

capacities. The predictions of breakthrough curves from eq. 4, using these rate parameters are

314

shown in Figure 7, together with the experimental data points. The excellent fit of the

315

experimental data with the deactivation model predictions indicates the decrease of activity of

316

the sorbent with time along with probable changes in textural characteristics of sorbents. Further,

317

it can be seen from Table 3 that the values of the rate constants from this study are almost the

318

same order of magnitude as those reported in the literature.

319 320 321

Figure 7. Experimental breakthrough curves (data points) and deactivation model predictions (lines)

322

3.5. Cyclic stability. A good sorbent should maintain a constant working capacity during

323

multiple operation of adsorption-desorption. High cyclic stability is always desirable as it

324

reduces the operational cost due to low frequency of sorbent replacement in large scale

325

operation. Studies have shown that alkali impregnation improves the cyclic stability of parent 17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 18 of 23

326

LDH as well as supported LDH at ordinary pressure in the temperature range of 200 − 450 °C.7,39

327

Figure 8 shows the normalized CO2 adsorption capacity on KMOC and MO for 10 cycles of

328

adsorption-desorption. The KMOC exhibited better cyclic stability than MO and maintained an

329

average working capacity of 0.81 mmol g-1 over 10 cycles in the temperature range of 300 – 400

330

°C. It has been thought that the dispersion of the LDH on the MWNTs support apparently

331

mitigated the sintering during calcination leading to a more active and stable material.10

332 333

Figure 8. Normalized CO2 adsorption capacities of MO and KMOC

334

4. CONCLUSION

335

The Mg–Al LDH/multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) composite was synthesized using

336

the co-precipitation method. Additionally, K2CO3 was impregnated onto the composite to study

337

the effect of alkali promotion on CO2 adsorption. The synthesized materials were characterized

338

using N2 physisorption isotherms, PXRD, and electron microscopy techniques, which revealed

339

the successful synthesis of composite adsorbents. The LDH/MWNT composites exhibited better

340

CO2 sorption capacities than those of their counterparts. The enhanced capacity can be attributed

341

to better contact between gas and surface of active material due to improved particle dispersion.

342

The deactivation model provided a good prediction of the experimental CO2 breakthrough data. 18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 19 of 23

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

343

The values of the model parameters obtained are almost the same order of magnitude as those

344

reported in the literature. Further, the KMOC exhibited better cyclic stability than MO and

345

maintained an average working capacity of 0.81 mmol g-1 over 10 cycles in the temperature

346

range of 300 – 400 °C, apparently due to mitigation of sintering during calcination. The

347

possibility of further improvement in CO2 adsorption capacity of KMOC demands a deeper

348

study on optimization of MWNT.

349 350 351

AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding Author ∗

352 353 354 355 356 357

Phone: +91 80 2757 7200. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

358

The authors would like to acknowledge Prof P. V. Satyam (IOP, Bhubaneswar) as well as and

359

Prof S. M. Shivaprasad (JNCASR, Bangalore) for helping in electron microscopy measurements,

360

and Mr. Omkar S Power, Jain University for assistance in conducting the experiments. The

361

authors also thank the authorities of Bangalore Institute of Technology and St. Joseph's College,

362

Bangalore for their help in characterization of samples (BET and PXRD).

363

REFERENCES

364

(1) Choi, S.; Drese, J. H.; Jones, C. W. ChemSusChem 2009, 2, 796-854.

365

(2) Bhatta, L. K. G.; Subramanyam, S.; Chengala, M. D.; Olivera, S.; Venkatesh, K. J Clean

366

Prod. 2015, 103, 171-196.

367

(3) Chowdhury, S.; Parshetti, G. K.; Balasubramanian, R. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 263, 374-384.

368

(4) Vaccari, A.; Catal. Today 1998, 41, 53-71.

369

(5) Yong, Z.; Mata, V.; Rodrigues, A. E. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 204-209.

Notes The authors declare no competing financial interest.

19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 20 of 23

370

(6) Lee, K. B.; Beaver, M. G.; Caram, H. S.; Sircar, S. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 8048-

371

8062.

372

(7) Zhu, X.; Wang, Q.; Shi, Y.; Cai, N. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2015, 40, 9244-9253.

373

(8) Wang, J.; Huang, L.; Yang, R.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, J.; Gao, Y.; Wang, Q.; O’Hare, D.; Zhong, D.

374

Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 3478-3518.

375

(9) Jiang, X.; Gu, J.; Bai, X.; Lin, L.; Zhang, Y. Pigm. Resin Technol. 2009, 38, 165-173.

376

(10)

377

Thabaiti, S. A.; Alyoubi, A. O.; Chadwick, D.; Shaffer, M. S. P. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22,

378

13932-13940.

379

(11)

380

Chem. A 2013, 1, 12782-12790.

381

(12)

382

2006, 45, 7504-7509.

383

(13)

384

Borgna, A. ChemSusChem 2010, 3, 965-973.

385

(14)

386

Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54, 10876-10884.

387

(15)

388

Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2012, 37, 4516-4525.

389

(16)

390

W. ChemSusChem 2008, 1, 643-650.

391

(17)

Yang, J and Kim, J. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2006, 23, 77-80.

392

(18)

Ebner, A. D.; Reynolds, S. P.; Ritter, J. A. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 6387-6392.

G-Gallastegui, A.; Iruretagoyena, D.; Mokhtar, M.; Asiri, A. M.; Basahel, S. N.; Al-

Gao, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, J.; Yi, X.; Zheng, A.; Umar, A.; O'Hare, D.; Wang, Q. J. Mater.

Reddy, M. K. R.; Xu, Z. P.; (Max) Lu, G. Q.; Diniz da Costa, J. C. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.

Wang, Q.; Tay, H. H.; Ng, D. J. W.; Chen, L.; Liu, Y.; Chang, J.; Zhong, Z.; Luo, J.;

Bhatta, L. K. G.; Subramanyam, S.; Chengala, M. D.; Bhatta, U. M.; Venkatesh, K. Ind.

Halabi, M. H.; De Croon, M. H. J. M.; van der Schaaf J.; Cobden, P. D.; Schouten, J. C.

Walspurger, S.; Boels, L.; Cobden, P. D.; Elzinga, G. D.; Haije, W. G.; van den Brink, R.

20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 21 of 23

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

393

(19)

Lee, K. B.; Verdooren, A.; Caram, H. S.; Sircar, S. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2007, 308,

394

30-39.

395

(20)

396

147.

397

(21)

Ding, Y. and Alpay, E. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2000, 55, 3461-3474.

398

(22)

Vijayasankar, A. V.; Mahadevaiah, N.; Bhat, Y. S.; Nagaraju, N. J. Porous Mater. 2011,

399

18, 369-378.

400

(23)

401

2010, 49, 3663-3671.

402

(24)

Hanif, A.; Dasgupta, S.; Nanoti, A. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 280, 703-710.

403

(25)

Iruretagoyena, D.; Shaffer, M. S. P.; Chadwick, D. Adsorption 2014, 20, 321-330.

404

(26)

Hofman, P. S.; Rufford, T. E.; Chan, K. I.; May, E. F. Adsorption 2012, 18, 251-263.

405

(27)

Rajendran, A.; Kariwala, V.; Farooq, S. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2008, 63, 2696-2706.

406

(28)

Chatti, R.; Bansiwal, A. K.; Thote, J. A.; Kumar, V.; Jadhav, P.; Lokhande, S. K.;

407

Biniwale, R. B.; Labhsetwar, N. K.; Rayalu, S. S. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2009, 121,

408

84-89.

409

(29)

Su, F.; Lu, C.; Chen, H. Langmuir 2011, 27, 8090-8098.

410

(30)

Su, F.; Lu, C.; Kuo, S.; Zeng, W. Energy Fuels 2010, 24, 1441–1448.

411

(31)

Guo, Y.; Zhao, C.; Chen, X.; Li, C. Appl. Energy 2015, 137, 26-36.

412

(32)

Li, L.; Wen, X.; Fu, X.; Wang, F.; Zhao, N.; Xiao, F.; Wei, W.; Sun, Y. Energy Fuels

413

2010, 24, 5773-5780.

414

(33)

415

30, 663-666.

Oliveira, E. L. G.; Grande, C. A.; Rodrigues, A. E. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 62, 137-

Leon, M.; Diaz, E.; Bennici, S.; Vega, A.; Ordonez, S.; Auroux, A. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.

Dahlan, I.; Mohamed, A. R.; Kamaruddin, A. H.; Lee, K. T. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2007,

21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 22 of 23

416

(34)

Suyadal, Y.; Erol, M.; Oguz, H. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2000, 39, 724-730.

417

(35)

Hwang, K.; Han, L.; Park, D.; Oh, K.; Kim, S.; Park, S. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2010, 27,

418

241-248.

419

(36)

Park, S.; Sung, D.; Choi, B.; Oh, K.; Moon, K. Separ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 41, 2665-2684.

420

(37)

Yasyerli, S.; Dogu, G.; Ar I.; Dogu, T. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 5206-5214.

421

(38)

Kopac, T and Kocabas, S. Chem. Eng. Comm. 2003, 190, 1041-1054.

422

(39)

Walspurger, S.; de Munck, S.; Cobden, P. D.; Haije, W. G.; van den Brink, R. W.;

423

Safonova, O.V. Energy Procedia 2011,4, 1162-1167.

424

(40)

425

614-618.

426

(41)

Ficicilar, B and Dogu, T. Catal. Today 2006, 115, 274-278.

427

(42)

Song, F.; Zhao, Y.; Zhong, Q. J. Environ. Sci. 2013, 25, 554-560.

428

Table 1. BET surface area and pore characteristics of samples

Wang, X. P.; Yu, J. J.; Cheng, J.; Hao, Z. P.; Xu, Z. P. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42,

Sample

Surface area (m2 g-1)

Pore volume (cm3 g-1)

Average Pore Diameter (nm)

MO

95.6

0.29

11.8

KMO

84.7

0.15

7.1

MOC

460.3

0.90

7.8

KMOC

431.9

0.93

8.6

MWNTs

587.2

1.71

11.6

429 430

Table 2. CO2 adsorption data and deactivation model parameters Adsorption capacity

Deactivation model parameters

(mmol g-1 of total mass of sorbent) Adsorbent

qBT

qSA

ko (cm3 min-1 g-1) a

kd (min-1) x 102 R2

22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 23 of 23

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

MO

0.30

0.45

85.02

54.56

0.9999

KMO

0.43

0.65

93.27

39.01

0.9999

MOC

0.53

0.85

108.00

33.68

0.9999

KMOC

0.84

1.12

126.07

25.01

0.9999

a

with temperature correction for the flow rate

431 432

Table 3. Comparison of deactivation model parameters Adsorbent

Feed gas (vol%)a

Sorption

ko (cm3 min-1 g-1)

kd (min-1)

Ref.

conditions MgAlO

8% CO2

350 °C, 1 bar

148.7

0.51

40

CoAlO

8% CO2

350 °C, 1 bar

162.6

0.68

40

CaAlO

8% CO2

350 °C, 1 bar

163.2

0.59

40

MgO/Al2O3

16% CO2

527 °C, 1 bar

195.3

0.68

41

Wood ash

10% CO2+12% H2O

100 °C

480

0.72

31

TiNT-TEPA

15% CO2

70 °C

672.4

1.67

42

MgO/Al2O3

8% CO2

150 °C, 1 bar

47.92

0.46

32

KMOC

10% CO2

300 °C, 1 bar

126.07

0.25

This study

a

balanced by N2/He.

433

23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment