Nanomolar Copper Enhances Mercury Methylation by Desulfovibrio

Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF NEW ENGLAND ARMIDALE

Environmental Processes

Nanomolar Copper Enhances Mercury Methylation by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132 Xia Lu, Alexander Johs, Linduo Zhao, Lihong Wang, Eric M. Pierce, and Baohua Gu Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00232 • Publication Date (Web): 29 May 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 29, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 19

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

1 2

Nanomolar Copper Enhances Mercury Methylation by

3

Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132

4 5

Xia Lu,1,2 Alexander Johs,1 Linduo Zhao,1 Lihong Wang,1 Eric M. Pierce,1 Baohua Gu1,3*

6 7 8

1

Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, United States

9 10

2

Key Laboratory of Cell Activities and Stress Adaptations, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China 730000

11 12

3

Department of Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, United States

13 14

*

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Email: [email protected]; Phone: (865)-574-7286

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


26 27

ABSTRACT Methylmercury (MeHg) is produced by certain anaerobic microorganisms, such as the

28

sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132, but environmental factors

29

affecting inorganic mercury [Hg(II)] uptake and methylation remain unclear. We report that the

30

presence of a small amount of copper ions [Cu(II), 0.05), regardless of the reaction time (2 or 24 h) (Figure 1b), since both Mg(II) and Mn(II) are

146

nutrients for microbes.

147

The enhanced Hg(II) methylation by nanomolar concentrations of Cu(II), but not by

148

Zn(II) or Ni(II), is of particular interest and indicates that the enhancement is highly metal ion

149

specific. Therefore, we further investigated Hg(II) methylation at varying concentrations of

150

Cu(II), Zn(II), and Ni(II) (Figure 2; SI Figure S1). MeHg production increased significantly with

151

increasing Cu(II) concentrations up to 75–100 nM (p < 0.01), but decreased with further

152

increasing Cu(II) concentrations (>100 nM) (Figure 2a). At 50–100 nM Cu(II) (or Cu:Hg molar

153

ratios of 2 to 4), MeHg production nearly doubled, but then decreased consistently at Cu(II)

154

concentrations >200 nM. Methylation was completely inhibited at a Cu(II) concentration of 1

155

µM. Similarly, Zn(II) and Ni(II) at concentrations >200 nM inhibited Hg(II) methylation (SI

156

Figure S1) but, unlike Cu(II), lower Zn(II) or Ni(II) concentrations cannot enhance Hg(II)

157

methylation.



158

The effect of Cu(II) on Hg(II) methylation was also demonstrated in time-dependent

159

experiments; MeHg production again doubled within 24 h at a Cu(II) concentration of 75 nM

160

(Figure 2b). However, significant inhibition occurred at a Cu(II) concentration of 500 nM at all

161

time points (p < 0.05). Careful examination of the initial methylation kinetics (within 0.5 h) also

162

revealed an inhibition of Hg(II) methylation even at low Cu(II) concentrations (25–75 nM)

163

(Figure 2b inset). MeHg production at 0.5 h decreased from 1.3 (±0.04) to 1.2 (±0.04) and

164

1.1(±0.03) nM with the addition of 0, 25, and 75 nM Cu(II), respectively, but then increased and

165

reached the same level as the Cu(II)-free control after 2 h, and ultimately exceeded that of the

166

control after 8 h. However, at a high Cu(II) concentration (500 nM), cells never completely

167

recovered, and methylation was inhibited even after 48 h. Therefore, the Cu(II)-enhanced or

168

inhibited methylation depends on both the Cu(II) concentration and exposure time, which can be

169

attributed again to both beneficial and toxic effects of Cu(II) on microbial metabolism. 24,29 The

170

initial, rapid uptake of Cu(II) and Hg(II) (described below) likely led to a metal stress response

171

by the cells, which is reflected in decreased MeHg production within the first 0.5 h. Over time,

172

the cells slowly recovered and detoxified, leading to enhanced methylation. These observations

173

suggest that microbial methylation activity was more sensitive to increasing Cu(II)

174

concentrations or Cu(II) toxicity than its overall metabolic activity, as evidenced by a substantial

175

decrease in Hg(II) methylation at 500 nM Cu(II) (Figure 2) but similar cell growth and

176

consumption rates of pyruvate and fumarate (or production rates of acetate and succinate) (SI

177

Figure S2). While exact mechanisms of Cu-enhanced Hg(II) methylation are unclear, it is known

178

that bacteria are extremely sensitive to Cu(II) toxicity and tightly control Cu resistance and

179

homeostasis.24, 31-33 Excess amounts of Cu(II) can trigger the expression of the genes for Cu

180

resistance such as Cu-efflux pumps to maintain tolerable copper levels in cells. 31,34,35 Gram-


Page 8 of 19

Page 9 of 19


181

negative bacteria may utilize several mechanisms to mitigate copper toxicity, such as tripartite

182

efflux pumps in the resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) family (e.g., CusCBA), 36,37

183

periplasmic multicopper oxidases (e.g., CueO, PcoA),38,39 and metallochaperones (e.g., CopZ,

184

CueP, etc.).32 The genome of D. desulfuricans ND132 encodes several homologs related to

185

copper efflux pumps, metallochaperones, and a putative Cu-responsive transcriptional regulator

186

(SI Table S1).

187

Since no apparent changes in cell growth or metabolic activity were observed over 72 h

188

either in the absence or presence of 75 nM Cu(II) (SI Figure S2), the results suggest that,

189

although it is not required, a small amount of Cu(II) may facilitate Hg(II) uptake and thus

190

methylation by a yet uncharacterized mechanism. This argument is supported by the following

191

lines of evidence; firstly, we found that addition of Cu(II) (75 and 200 nM) significantly

192

increased the initial rates of Hg(II) uptake by ND132 cells (p < 0.05) (Figure 3). When the cells

193

were added to a mixed solution of Cu(II) (75 nM) and Hg(II) (25 nM), cells took up ~65% of the

194

Hg(II) within a minute, as compared to ~30% of the Hg(II) uptake in Cu-free controls (Figure 3).

195

Hg(II) sorption and uptake by ND132 cells are fairly rapid (SI Figure S3), even in the absence of

196

Cu(II), as previously reported.23,26,27 Therefore, nearly 100% of the added Hg(II) was taken up

197

after 24 h, regardless of the presence or absence of Cu(II). At a high level of Cu(II) (200 nM),

198

Hg(II) uptake also increased from 8.6 nM [no Cu(II)] to 17.6 nM in 1 min, and from 15.9 nM to

199

19.7 nM in 30 min (Figure 3). Secondly, as described earlier, the Cu(II)-enhanced Hg(II) uptake

200

and methylation are metal ion specific since no enhancement was observed with the addition of

201

Zn(II) or Ni(II) at the same concentrations (Figure 1a; SI Figures S1 and S4). Only inhibitory

202

effects of Zn(II) and Ni(II) were observed at concentrations above 200 nM. The enhanced Hg(II)

203

methylation was observed neither with the addition of Mg(II) or Mn(II) (Figure 1b) at both low



204

and high concentrations. We also determined the effects of competition between Cu(II) (50 nM)

205

and Mg(II) (50 µM) on Hg(II) methylation and found that addition of Cu(II) (50 nM) together

206

with a high concentration of Mg(II) (50 µM) did not show any inhibitory effects on Hg(II)

207

methylation either (SI Figure S5), suggesting that there was no competition between Cu(II) and

208

Mg(II) and thus no effects on MeHg production.

209

Taken together our results indicate: (1) The presence of Cu(II) facilitates an initial rapid

210

uptake of Hg(II), but this effect diminishes over time, regardless of the presence or absence of

211

Cu(II) (Figure 3), as cells may have other pathways for Hg(II) uptake; (2) The initial, rapid

212

uptake of Hg(II) results in decreased Hg(II) methylation within a short time period (0.5 h)

213

(Figure 2b, inset). However, over time (> 2 h), methylation increases in the presence of low

214

Cu(II) concentrations ( 500 nM), cell

216

methylation activity was unable to recover, leading to a consistent decrease or cease of Hg(II)

217

methylation; (4) The Cu(II)-enhanced Hg(II) uptake and methylation are highly specific and not

218

observed with divalent metal ions such as Zn(II), Ni(II), Mg(II), and Mn(II) under the same

219

experimental conditions. Whether the initial increase in Hg(II) uptake involves copper

220

transporters or metallochaperones is unknown at present. Future studies may target specific

221

genes implicated with copper transport and homeostasis to confirm the potential roles of copper-

222

transporters and chaperones in Hg(II) uptake and methylation in ND132.

223


Page 10 of 19

Page 11 of 19


224

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

225

Supporting Information

226

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI:

227

XXX. Additional details on cell culture medium and conditions; Tables showing proteins

228

implicated with Cu transport and homeostasis; Figures showing metal ion effects on Hg(II)

229

methylation, cell growth and metabolic activity, and Hg(II) sorption and uptake.

230

Notes

231

The authors declare no competing financial interest. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will

232

provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the

233

DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doepublic-access-plan).

234 235

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

236

We thank Xiangping Yin for technical assistance in Hg(II) and MeHg analyses. This research

237

was sponsored by US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science, Office of Biological and

238

Environmental Research, as part of the Mercury Science Focus Area at the Oak Ridge National

239

Laboratory (ORNL), which is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC05-

240

00OR22725 with DOE.

241 242

REFERENCES

243 244 245

1.

Lavoie, R. A.; Jardine, T. D.; Chumchal, M. M.; Kidd, K. A.; Campbell, L. M., Biomagnification of mercury in aquatic food webs: A worldwide meta-analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47 (23), 13385-13394.

246 247

2.

Krabbenhoft, D. P.; Sunderland, E. M., Global change and mercury. Science 2013, 341 (6153), 1457-1458.

248 249

3.

Lamborg, C. H.; Hammerschmidt, C. R.; Bowman, K. L.; Swarr, G. J.; Munson, K. M.; Ohnemus, D. C.; Lam, P. J.; Heimburger, L. E.; Rijkenberg, M. J. A.; Saito, M. A., A global 11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


ocean inventory of anthropogenic mercury based on water column measurements. Nature 2014, 512, 65-68.

250 251 252 253 254

4.

Jonsson, S.; Skyllberg, U.; Nilsson, M. B.; Lundberg, E.; Andersson, A.; Bjorn, E., Differentiated availability of geochemical mercury pools controls methylmercury levels in estuarine sediment and biota. Nature Comm. 2014, 5, 4624.

255 256 257

5.

Clayden, M. G.; Lescord, G. L.; Kidd, K. A.; Wang, X. W.; Muir, D. C. G.; O'Driscoll, N. J., Using sulfur stable isotopes to assess mercury bioaccumulation and biomagnification in temperate lake food webs. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2017, 36 (3), 661-670.

258 259 260 261

6.

Parks, J. M.; Johs, A.; Podar, M.; Bridou, R.; Hurt, R. A.; Smith, S. D.; Tomanicek, S. J.; Qian, Y.; Brown, S. D.; Brandt, C. C.; Palumbo, A. V.; Smith, J. C.; Wall, J. D.; Elias, D. A.; Liang, L., The genetic basis for bacterial mercury methylation. Science 2013, 339 (6125), 1332-1335.

262 263 264

7.

Benoit, J. M.; Gilmour, C. C.; Mason, R. P., Aspects of bioavailability of mercury for methylation in pure cultures of Desulfobulbus propionicus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67 (1), 51-58.

265 266 267

8.

Benoit, J. M.; Gilmour, C. C.; Mason, R. P.; Heyes, A., Sulfide controls on mercury speciation and bioavailability to methylating bacteria in sediment pore waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33 (6), 951-957.

268 269 270

9.

Najera, I.; Lin, C. C.; Kohbodi, G. A.; Jay, J. A., Effect of chemical speciation on toxicity of mercury to Escherichia coli biofilms and planktonic cells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39 (9), 3116-3120.

271 272 273

10. Zhou, J.; Smith, M. D.; Cooper, S. J.; Cheng, X. L.; Smith, J. C.; Parks, J. M., Modeling of the passive permeation of mercury and methylmercury complexes through a bacterial cytoplasmic membrane. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51 (18), 10595-10604.

274 275

11. Schaefer, J. K.; Morel, F. M. M., High methylation rates of mercury bound to cysteine by Geobacter sulfurreducens. Nature Geosci. 2009, 2 (2), 123-126.

276 277 278

12. Schaefer, J. K.; Rocks, S. S.; Zheng, W.; Liang, L.; Gu, B.; Morel, F. M. M., Active transport, substrate specificity, and methylation of Hg(II) in anaerobic bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108 (21), 8714-8719.

279 280

13. Lin, H.; Lu, X.; Liang, L.; Gu, B., Cysteine inhibits mercury methylation by Geobacter Sulfurreducens PCA mutant ΔomcBESTZ. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2015, 2, 144–148.

281 282 283 284

14. Graham, A. M.; Bullock, A. L.; Maizel, A. C.; Elias, D. A.; Gilmour, C. C., Detailed assessment of the kinetics of Hg-cell association, Hg methylation, and methylmercury degradation in several Desulfovibrio species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78 (20), 73377346.


Page 12 of 19

Page 13 of 19


285 286 287

15. Lin, H.; Morrell-Falvey, J. L.; Rao, B.; Liang, L.; Gu, B., Coupled mercury-cell sorption, reduction, and oxidation affecting methylmercury production by Geobacter sulfurreducens PCA. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48 (20), 11969-11976.

288 289 290

16. Lu, X.; Liu, Y.; Johs, A.; Zhao, L.; Wang, T.; Yang, Z.; Lin, H.; Elias, D. A.; Pierce, E. M.; Liang, L.; Barkay, T.; Gu, B., Anaerobic mercury methylation and demethylation by Geobacter bemidjiensis Bem. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50 (8), 4366-4373.

291 292 293

17. Liu, Y.; Lu, X.; Zhao, L.; An, J.; He, J. Z.; Pierce, E. M.; Johs, A.; Gu, B., Effects of cellular sorption on mercury bioavailability and methylmercury production by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 13335-13341.

294 295 296 297

18. Ndu, U.; Barkay, T.; Mason, R. P.; Schartup, A. T.; Al-Farawati, R.; Liu, J.; Reinfelder, J. R., The use of a mercury biosensor to evaluate the bioavailability of mercury-thiol complexes and mechanisms of mercury uptake in bacteria. PLoS One 2015, 10 (9), e0138333.

298 299 300

19. Thomas, S. A.; Tong, T. Z.; Gaillard, J. F., Hg(II) bacterial biouptake: the role of anthropogenic and biogenic ligands present in solution and spectroscopic evidence of ligand exchange reactions at the cell surface. Metallomics 2014, 6 (12), 2213-2222.

301 302

20. Daguene, V.; McFall, E.; Yumvihoze, E.; Xiang, S. R.; Amyot, M.; Poulain, A. J., Divalent base cations hamper Hg(II) uptake. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46 (12), 6645-6653.

303 304

21. Schaefer, J. K.; Szczuka, A.; Morel, F. M. M., Effect of divalent metals on Hg(II) uptake and methylation by bacteria. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48 (5), 3007-3013.

305 306 307 308

22. Gilmour, C. C.; Elias, D. A.; Kucken, A. M.; Brown, S. D.; Palumbo, A. V.; Schadt, C. W.; Wall, J. D., Sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132 as a model for understanding bacterial mercury methylation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77 (12), 3938-3951.

309 310 311

23. Zhao, L.; Chen, H.; Lu, X.; Lin, H.; Christensen, G. A.; Pierce, E. M.; GU, B., Contrasting effects of dissolved organic matter on mercury methylation by G. sulfurreducens PCA and D. desulfuricans ND132. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 10468–10475.

312 313 314

24. Khalfaoui-Hassani, B.; Verissimo, A. F.; Koch, H. G.; Daldal, F., Uncovering the transmembrane metal binding site of the novel bacterial major facilitator superfamily-type copper importer CcoA. Mbio 2016, 7 (1), e01981-15.

315 316 317

25. Zane, G. M.; Yen, H. C. B.; Wall, J. D., Effect of the deletion of qmoABC and the promoter-distal gene encoding a hypothetical protein on sulfate reduction in Desulfovibrio vulgaris hildenborough. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76 (16), 5500-5509.

318 319

26. Lu, X.; Gu, W. Y.; Zhao, L.; Ul Haque, M. F.; DiSpirito, A. A.; Semrau, J. D.; Gu, B., Methylmercury uptake and degradation by methanotrophs. Science Adv. 2017, 3, e1700041.



320 321

27. Lin, H.; Lu, X.; Liang, L.; Gu, B., Thiol-facilitated cell export and desorption of methylmercury by anaerobic bacteria. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2015, 2 (10), 292-296.

322 323

28. Nies, D. H., Resistance to cadmium, cobalt, zinc, and nickel in microbes. Plasmid 1992, 27 (1), 17-28.

324 325

29. Waldron, K. J.; Robinson, N. J., How do bacterial cells ensure that metalloproteins get the correct metal? Nature Reviews Microbiology 2009, 7 (1), 25-35.

326 327

30. Macomber, L.; Hausinger, R. P., Mechanisms of nickel toxicity in microorganisms. Metallomics 2011, 3 (11), 1153-1162.

328 329 330 331

31. Porcheron, G.; Garénaux, A.; Proulx, J.; Sabri, M.; Dozois, C. M., Iron, copper, zinc, and manganese transport and regulation in pathogenic Enterobacteria: correlations between strains, site of infection and the relative importance of the different metal transport systems for virulence. Frontiers Cell. Inf. Microbiol. 2013, 3, Article 90.

332 333

32. Arguello, J. M.; Raimunda, D.; Padilla-Benavides, T., Mechanisms of copper homeostasis in bacteria. Front Cell Infect Mi 2013, 3, 73.

334 335 336 337

33. Osman, D.; Patterson, C. J.; Bailey, K.; Fisher, K.; Robinson, N. J.; Rigby, S. E. J.; Cavet, J. S., The copper supply pathway to a Salmonella Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase (SodCII) involves P1B-type ATPase copper efflux and periplasmic CueP. Mol Microbiol 2013, 87 (3), 466-477.

338 339

34. Nies, D. H.; Herzberg, M., A fresh view of the cell biology of copper in enterobacteria. Mol Microbiol 2013, 87 (3), 447-454.

340 341

35. Bondarczuk, K.; Piotrowska-Seget, Z., Molecular basis of active copper resistance mechanisms in Gram-negative bacteria. Cell Biol Toxicol 2013, 29 (6), 397-405.

342 343 344

36. Long, F.; Su, C. C.; Zimmermann, M. T.; Boyken, S. E.; Rajashankar, K. R.; Jernigan, R. L.; Yu, E. W., Crystal structures of the CusA efflux pump suggest methionine-mediated metal transport. Nature 2010, 467 (7314), 484-U140.

345 346 347

37. Long, F.; Su, C. C.; Lei, H. T.; Bolla, J. R.; Do, S. V.; Yu, E. W., Structure and mechanism of the tripartite CusCBA heavy-metal efflux complex. Philos T R Soc B 2012, 367 (1592), 1047-1058.

348 349

38. Rensing, C.; Fan, B.; Sharma, R.; Mitra, B.; Rosen, B. P., CopA: An Escherichia coli Cu(I)translocating P-type ATPase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000, 97 (2), 652-656.

350 351 352

39. Djoko, K. Y.; Xiao, Z. G.; Wedd, A. G., Copper resistance in E-coli: The multicopper oxidase PcoA catalyzes oxidation of copper(I) in (CuCuII)-Cu-I-PcoC. ChemBioChem 2008, 9 (10), 1579-1582.

353


Page 14 of 19

Page 15 of 19


354 355

FIGURE CAPTIONS:

356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363

Figure 1. Methylmercury (MeHg) production by washed cells of D. desulfuricans ND132 at 2 h and 24 h in the presence of various divalent metal ions: (a) 50 nM and (b) 50 µM each. The initial added Hg(II) (as HgCl2) concentration was 25 nM, which was mixed first with the metal ion solution in PBS. Cells were added last at 5×108 cells mL-1. Error bars represent one standard deviation of replicate samples (3–5) from two independent batch experiments. An asterisk denotes a significant difference from the control (PBS only), p < 0.01, using pairwise comparison (Bonferroni test) in the one-way ANOVA.

364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371

Figure 2. (a) Copper concentration-dependent Hg(II) methylation with washed cells of D. desulfuricans ND132 (5×108 cells/mL) in 24 h, and (b) MeHg production kinetics in the presence of Cu(II) at 0, 25, 75, and 500 nM under the same experimental conditions described in Figure 1. The Inset shows MeHg production in the first 8 h. Error bars in (a) represent one standard deviation of 6–8 replicate samples from three independent batches and (b) from 2–3 replicate samples. The statistical differences were tested at the 0.05 significance level by the one-way ANOVA (a) or two-way repeated measures ANOVA (b).

372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379

Figure 3. Effects of Cu(II) ions on time-dependent Hg(II) uptake by washed cells of D. desulfuricans ND132 in PBS. Hg(II) uptake (or internalized) was determined by the difference between the total Hg(II) and the wash-off inorganic Hg(II) using a strong Hgchelator, 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanesulfonic acid (DMPS) at various time points. Other experimental conditions are the same as described in Figure 1. Error bars represent one standard deviation of 2–3 replicate samples. The statistical differences were tested at the 0.05 significance level by the two-way repeated measures ANOVA.

380 381 382



383

Page 16 of 19

Figure 1

14 2h

(a) 50 nM 12

24 h

*

MeHg (nM)

10 8 6 4 2 0

PBS only Mg

Mn

Ni

Zn

Cu

14

(b) 50 M

2h

24 h

12

MeHg (nM)

10 8 6 4 2 0 384

* PBS only Mg

Mn

Ni

385


* *

* *

Zn

Cu

Page 17 of 19

386


Figure 2 14

(a)

12

MeHg (nM)

10 8 6 4

24 h

2 0 0

100

200

300

500

1000

Cu (nM) 4

15

0 Cu

75 nM Cu

25 nM Cu

500 nM Cu

(b)

2

MeHg (nM)

12 0

9

0.5 h

2h

8h

6

3

0 Cu 25 nM Cu 75 nM Cu 500 nM Cu

0 0 387

12

24

36

Time (h)


48


388

Page 18 of 19

Figure 3

389

25

0 nM Cu 75 nM Cu 200 nM Cu

Hg uptake (nM)

20 15 10 5 0 390

1 min

3 min

10 min

30 min

391


24 h


15

15

50 nM metal ions added

MeHg (nM)

12

12

2h

24 h

9 6 3

MeHg (nM)

Page 19 of 19

9

0

PBS only Mg

Mn

Ni

Zn

Cu

6

24 h 3

0 0

100

200

300

500

Cu (nM)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

1000

Nanomolar Copper Enhances Mercury Methylation by Desulfovibrio

Recommend Documents