Near-Room-Temperature Ethanol Detection Using Ag-Loaded

Jul 14, 2017 - Article Views: 825 Times. Received 19 April 2017. Date accepted 7 June ... We live in a thirsty world. Each person on Earth needs about...
0 downloads 0 Views 6MB Size
This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License, which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.

Article http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf

Near-Room-Temperature Ethanol Detection Using Ag-Loaded Mesoporous Carbon Nitrides Vijay K. Tomer,† Ritu Malik,‡ and Kamalakannan Kailasam*,† †

Institute of Nano Science and Technology (INST), Mohali, Punjab 160062, India Department of Applied Physics, Mahavir Swami Institute of Technology, Sonepat, Haryana 131001, India



S Supporting Information *

ABSTRACT: Development of room-temperature gas sensors is a much sought-after aspect that has fostered research in realizing new two-dimensional materials with high surface area for rapid response and low-ppm detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Herein, a fast-response and low-ppm ethanol gas sensor operating at near room temperature has been fabricated successfully by utilizing cubic mesoporous graphitic carbon nitride (g-CN, commonly known as g-C3N4), synthesized through template inversion of mesoporous silica, KIT-6. Upon exposure to 50 ppm ethanol at 250 °C, the optimized Ag/g-CN showed a significantly higher response (Ra/Rg = 49.2), fast response (11.5 s), and full recovery within 7 s in air. Results of sensing tests conducted at 40 °C show that the sensor exhibits not only a highly selective response to 50 ppm (Ra/Rg = 1.3) and 100 ppm (Ra/Rg = 3.2) of ethanol gas but also highly reversible and rapid response and recovery along with long-term stability. This outstanding response is due to its easily accessible three-dimensional mesoporous structure with higher surface area and unique planar morphology of Ag/g-CN. This study could provide new avenues for the design of next-generation roomtemperature VOC sensors for effective and efficient monitoring of alarming concern over indoor environment.



INTRODUCTION The quench of realizing highly sensitive, fast response/recovery, and selective gas sensors that can operate at room temperature for detecting trace concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in indoor climate has always fostered the development of novel synthesis routes and new materials.1,2 Ethanol is one of the kinds of beverage VOC present in alcoholic drinks (beer, wine, whiskey, liquors, spirits, etc.) in diluted form.3,4 The detection of the concentration of ethanol in breath, blood, or urine facilitates prosecuting drunk drivers.5−7 In addition, the quantitative detection of ethanol in human breath can be utilized as breath marker for specific diseases.3−5 Ethanol is also used as an industrial solvent, and its vapors are released in air during the production of chemical compounds such as lacquers, aerosols, cleaning/mouthwash products, polishes, surface coatings, dyes, inks, pesticides, preservatives, explosives, and petrol additives.8,9 Ethanol is a central nervous system depressant and affects brain, brainstem, and spinal cord when inhaled or consumed. Exposure to ethanol leads to stupor, nausea, mental excitement or depression, vomiting, loss of coordination (ataxia), sleepiness, narcosis, impaired perception, lack of coordination, and death.10,11 Considering the harmful effects of the potential exposure of ethanol gas on human, much efforts have been invested in the development of low-cost, highly sensitive, selective, and durable ethanol sensors, which can precisely © 2017 American Chemical Society

recognize and detect ethanol gas when operating at room temperature as well as result in significantly fast response and recovery.12−14 Recently, explosive growth of interest in generating novel two-dimensional (2D) materials because of their high surfaceto-volume ratio, quantum hall effect at room temperature, high electron transfer rate, and excellent thermal stability has stimulated their use in a variety of applications, such as energy-storage devices, catalysis, and chemical sensors.15,16 Graphitic carbon nitrides (g-CNs, commonly known as gC3N4) are a metal-free polymeric semiconductor consisting of tri-s-triazine building blocks with structure analogous to that of 2D layered graphite.17−20 Owing to its exciting physicochemical properties, appropriate band gap, and excellent thermal/ chemical stability, g-CN has been extensively explored in photocatalysis, electrocatalysis, fuel cell, bioimaging, and sensing applications.15−19 However, in conventional g-CN, the high degree of polycondensation of monomeric heptazine units results in a very low surface area (3 times) toward detecting

Hence, the ethanol gas removes the adsorbed oxygen, frees up electrons, and increases the electrical conductivity of the Ag/ meso-CN sensor. Role of Ag NPs. Ag NPs because of their excellent electrical conductivity have been known to increase the response of ntype semiconductors. The presence of Ag NPs accelerates the process of catalytic oxidation and chemical sensitization, which increases active oxygen species on the surface of meso-CN. Chemical sensitization (spillover effect) of Ag NPs greatly enhances the adsorption−desorption rate of molecular oxygen over the sensor surface and converts them to oxygen ions (O−) 3665

DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.7b00479 ACS Omega 2017, 2, 3658−3668

ACS Omega

Article

of the samples was observed using HRTEM instrument (JEOL) at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. Quantitative information on the elemental composition was obtained using SEM instrument (JSM-IT300; JEOL). Gas-Sensing Measurement. Sensing measurements were performed on Ag−Pd interdigitated substrates with five pairs of electrodes. The procedure for sensor fabrication and gassensing experiments was similar to that described in our previous study.12,24 To measure the sensor response under highly humid conditions, the humidity level was maintained at 90% RH in the testing sensor chamber. The resulting response (R = Ra/Rg) is the mean value obtained from repeated experiments at a particular temperature.

ethanol gas compared to that of measured test VOCs. Interestingly, the response at near room temperature (40 °C) shows that the sensor was also able to selectively detect 50 ppm (R = 1.3) and 100 ppm (R = 3.2) ethanol gas among a variety of test VOCs. The excellent sensing response results from the high surface area and the unique planar morphology of Ag/gCN, which facilitates the adsorption and diffusion and fastens the reaction kinetics of ethanol molecules on its surface. We believe that the demonstration of outstanding room-temperature sensing results in this study holds promise for the accurate identification of harmful VOCs present in indoor climate at room temperature and thus provides a positive glimpse for futuristic miniaturized, handheld sensing devices with superior gas-sensing attributes.





EXPERIMENTAL SECTION Synthesis of Mesoporous Silica, KIT-6. Typically, Pluronic P123 (2.0 g; Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in 70 mL of distilled water and vigorously stirred (1200 rpm) at 40 °C for 1 h. HCl (2.75 mL, 35%; Fisher Scientific) was added to the above solution, and the mixture was again stirred for 45 min. Thereafter, 1-butanol (2.5 mL; Fisher Scientific) was added and stirred to obtain a clear transparent solution. To this solution, tetraethoxy orthosilicate (4.6 mL; Sigma-Aldrich) was added and further stirred for 24 h. The white gel product thus obtained was autoclaved in a hydrothermal reactor at 100 °C for 24 h. After cooling to room temperature, the products were recovered, washed, and dried at 80 °C. Finally, the recovered products were calcined at 550 °C (heating rate, 2 °C/min) for 4 h to produce KIT-6. Mesoporous g-CN (meso-CN). The mesoporous g-CN was synthesized using as-prepared KIT-6 silica as hard template. Initially, CH2N2 (cyanamide, 1 g; Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in 1 mL of distilled water and then poured dropwise in KIT-6 (0.5 g). The mixture was stirred for 1 h at 40 °C, followed by drying in air at 80 °C for 3 h. The white powder was then moved to a covered crucible and heated at 550 °C (heating rate, 2 °C/min) for 4 h. The obtained products were mixed with NH4HF2 (ammonium hydrogen difluoride, 2M, 50 mL; Sigma-Aldrich) and stirred for 24 h. The bright yellow filtrate was washed with distilled water and dried at 100 °C for 6 h to obtain ordered meso-CN nanostructures. Ordered mesoporous Ag-doped g-CN nanostructures (Ag/ meso-CN) were obtained by sequential addition of an adequate amount of AgNO3 (silver nitrate; Fisher Scientific) aqueous solution to the solution of cyanamide, and further the same route was followed as utilized for the synthesis of meso-CN nanostructures. A series of optimizing experiments were carried out with different weight ratios of Ag in Ag/meso-CN nanocomposite, and the prepared products at above-mentioned ratios were denoted as Ag(X)/meso-CN, where X represents 1, 3, and 5 wt % ratios of Ag NPs in meso-CN. Conventional gCN was synthesized by directly heating cyanamide according to the reported procedure.20 Characterization. The crystalline phases of the materials were evaluated by XRD using advance Bruker D8 diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) at 40 kV and 40 mA in the 2θ range of 10−70°. SAXS data were recorded at 2θ = 0.5−3° on SAXSess mc2 instrument (Anton Paar) equipped with a high-performance charge-coupled device detector. Nitrogen-sorption isotherms were collected using Autosorb iQ2 instrument (Quantachrome) at 77 K. The samples were degassed overnight under vacuum at 200 °C. The morphology

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

S Supporting Information *

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.7b00479. Low-angle X-ray diffraction spectra and Barrett−Joyner− Halenda pore size distribution for all of the samples; response/recovery time of the Ag(3)/meso-CN sensor toward detection of 1 ppm ethanol gas at 250 °C and varying concentrations (50−500 ppm) of ethanol gas at 40 °C; response of as-prepared materials toward varying concentrations (10−1500 ppm) of ethanol gas and 100 ppm test gases at 40 °C; repeated response/recovery of the Ag(3)/meso-CN sensor to 50 ppm (250 °C) ethanol; the response and recovery times of all of the materials to 1 and 50 ppm (250 °C) ethanol gas; the response and recovery times of the Ag(3)/meso-CN sensor to 50 ppm (250 °C) test gases; stability in response of the Ag(3)/ meso-CN sensor to ethanol for 5 weeks (PDF)



AUTHOR INFORMATION

Corresponding Author

*E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]. ORCID

Vijay K. Tomer: 0000-0002-4368-9149 Kamalakannan Kailasam: 0000-0002-5931-7649 Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.



ACKNOWLEDGMENTS V.K.T. acknowledges INST and DST, Government of India, for postdoctoral fellowship. K.K. thanks DST, Government of India, for financial support to INST, Mohali, Punjab, India. The authors gratefully acknowledge Professor Surender Duhan, DCR University of Science & Technology (Haryana, India) for assistance in gas-sensing measurements.



REFERENCES

(1) Kapoor, M. P.; Kasama, Y.; Yokoyama, T.; Yanagi, M.; Inagaki, S.; Nanbu, H.; Juneja, L. R. Functionalized mesoporous dendritic silica hybrids as base catalysts with volatile organic compound elimination ability. J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 4714−4722. (2) Hoa, N. D.; Safty, S. A. E. Highly sensitive and selective volatile organic compound gas sensors based on mesoporous nanocomposite monoliths. Anal. Methods 2011, 3, 1948−1956. (3) Yarita, T.; Nakajima, R.; Otsuka, S.; Ihara, T.; Takatsu, A.; Shibukawa, M. Determination of ethanol in alcoholic beverages by high-performance liquid chromatography−flame ionization detection

3666

DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.7b00479 ACS Omega 2017, 2, 3658−3668

ACS Omega

Article

using pure water as mobile phase. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 976, 387− 391. (4) Gallignani, M.; Garrigues, S.; Guardia, M. D. L. Direct determination of ethanol in all types of alcoholic beverages by nearinfrared derivative spectrometry. Analyst 1993, 118, 1167−1173. (5) Schmitt, G.; Droenner, P.; Skopp, G.; Aderjan, R. Ethyl Glucuronide Concentration in Serum of Human Volunteers, Teetotalers, and Suspected Drinking Drivers. J. Forensic Sci. 1997, 42, 1099−1102. (6) Jones, A. W.; Andersson, L. Comparison of ethanol concentrations in venous blood and end-expired breath during a controlled drinking study. Forensic Sci. Int. 2003, 132, 18−25. (7) Miekisch, W.; Schubert, J. K. From highly sophisticated analytical techniques to life-saving diagnostics: Technical developments in breath analysis. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2006, 25, 665−673. (8) Wang, S.; Ang, H. M.; Tade, M. O. Volatile organic compounds in indoor environment and photocatalytic oxidation: State of the art. Environ. Int. 2007, 33, 694−705. (9) Mølhave, L.; Grønkjær, J.; Larsen, S. Subjective reactions to volatile organic compounds as air pollutants. Atmos. Environ., Part A 1991, 25, 1283−1293. (10) Brown, S. K.; Sim, M. R.; Abramson, M. J.; Gray, C. N. Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds in Indoor Air−A Review. Indoor air 1994, 4, 123−134. (11) Wolkoff, P.; Nielsen, G. D. Organic compounds in indoor air their relevance for perceived indoor air quality? Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35, 4407−4417. (12) Tomer, V. K.; Duhan, S. Ordered mesoporous Ag-doped TiO2/ SnO2 nanocomposite based highly sensitive and selective VOC sensors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 1033−1043. (13) Chen, G.; Ji, S.; Li, H.; Kang, X.; Chang, S.; Wang, Y.; Yu, G.; Lu, J.; Claverie, J.; Sang, Y.; Liu, H. High-Energy Faceted SnO2-Coated TiO2 Nanobelt Heterostructure for Near-Ambient TemperatureResponsive Ethanol Sensor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 24950−24956. (14) Shao, S.; Koehn, R.; Wu, H.; Wu, T.; Rao, W. F. Generation of highly ordered nanoporous Sb−SnO2 thin films with enhanced ethanol sensing performance at low temperature. New J. Chem. 2016, 40, 5523. (15) Zhang, H. Ultrathin Two-Dimensional Nanomaterials. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 9451−9469. (16) Tomer, V. K.; Nishanthi, S. T.; Gahlot, S.; Kailasam, K. Cubic mesoporous Ag@CN: A high performance humidity sensor. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 19794−19803. (17) Gu, Q.; Gao, Z.; Xue, C. Self-sensitized carbon nitride microspheres for long-lasting visible-light-driven hydrogen generation. Small 2016, 12, 3543−3549. (18) Kailasam, K.; Fischer, A.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, J.; Schwarze, M.; Schröder, M.; Wang, X.; Schomäcker, R.; Thomas, A. Mesoporous Carbon Nitride Tungsten Oxide Composites for Enhanced Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. ChemSusChem 2015, 8, 1404−1410. (19) Ong, W. J.; Tan, L. L.; Ng, Y. H.; Yong, S. T.; Chai, S. P. Graphitic Carbon Nitride (g-C3N4) Based Photocatalysts for Artificial Photosynthesis and Environmental Remediation: Are We a Step Closer To Achieving Sustainability? Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 7159− 7329. (20) Xiang, M.-H.; Liu, J.-W.; Li, N.; Tang, H.; Yu, R.-Q.; Jiang, J.-H. A fluorescent graphitic carbon nitride nanosheet biosensor for highly sensitive, label-free detection of alkaline phosphatase. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 4727−4732. (21) Tomer, V. K.; Duhan, S.; Malik, R.; Nehra, S. P.; Devi, S. A novel highly sensitive humidity sensor based on ZnO/SBA-15 hybrid nanocomposite. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 98, 3719−3725. (22) Wang, Y.; Liu, L.; Meng, C.; Zhou, Y.; Gao, Z.; Li, X.; Cao, X.; Xu, L.; Zhu, W. A novel ethanol gas sensor based on TiO2/Ag0.35V2O5 branched nanoheterostructures. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, No. 33092. (23) Zhang, L.; Zhao, J.; Lu, H.; Li, L.; Zheng, J.; Li, H.; Zhu, Z. Facile synthesis and ultrahigh ethanol response of hierarchically porous ZnO nanosheets. Sens. Actuators, B 2012, 161, 209−215.

(24) Malik, R.; Tomer, V. K.; Chaudhary, V.; Dahiya, M. S.; Nehra, S. P.; Rana, P. S.; Duhan, S. Ordered mesoporous In-(TiO2/WO3) nanohybrid: An ultrasensitive n-butanol sensor. Sens. Actuators, B 2017, 239, 364−373. (25) Tomer, V. K.; Devi, S.; Malik, R.; Duhan, S. Mesoporous Materials & Their Nanocomposites. In Nanomaterials and Nanocomposites; Visakh, P. M., Morlanes, M. J. M., Eds.; Wiley-VCH Verlag, 2016; pp 223−254. (26) Zhao, C.; Fu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Xie, E. Enhanced ethanol sensing performance of porous ultrathin NiO nanosheets with neck-connected networks. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 4018−4023. (27) Xu, S.; Sun, F.; Yang, S.; Pan, Z.; Long, J.; Gu, F. Fabrication of SnO2-Reduced Graphite Oxide Monolayer-Ordered Porous Film Gas Sensor with Tunable Sensitivity through Ultra-Violet Light Irradiation. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, No. 8939. (28) Lee, E. Z.; Jun, Y.-S.; Hong, W. H.; Thomas, A.; Jin, M. M. Cubic Mesoporous Graphitic Carbon (IV) Nitride: An All-in-One Chemosensor for Selective Optical Sensing of Metal Ions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 9706−9710. (29) Goettmann, F.; Fischer, A.; Antonietti, M.; Thomas, A. Chemical Synthesis of Mesoporous Carbon Nitrides Using Hard Templates and Their Use as a Metal-Free Catalyst for Friedel−Crafts Reaction of Benzene. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4467−4471. (30) Wang, X.; Maeda, K.; Chen, X.; Takanabe, K.; Domen, K.; Hou, Y.; Fu, X.; Antonietti, M. Polymer Semiconductors for Artificial Photosynthesis: Hydrogen Evolution by Mesoporous Graphitic Carbon Nitride with Visible Light. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 1680−1681. (31) Kailasam, K.; Epping, J. D.; Thomas, A.; Losse, S.; Junge, H. Mesoporous carbon nitride−silica composites by a combined sol−gel/ thermal condensation approach and their application as photocatalysts. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 4668−4674. (32) Kleitz, F.; Choi, S. H.; Ryoo, R. Cubic Ia3d large mesoporous silica: synthesis and replication to platinum nanowires, carbon nanorods and carbon nanotubes. Chem. Commun. 2003, 2003, 2136−2137. (33) Malik, R.; Rana, P. S.; Tomer, V. K.; Chaudhary, V.; Nehra, S. P.; Duhan, S. Visible light-driven mesoporous Au-TiO2/SiO2 photocatalysts for advanced oxidation process. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 10892− 10901. (34) Yan, H.; Song, P.; Zhang, S.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Q. Facile fabrication and enhanced gas sensing properties of hierarchical MoO3 nanostructures. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 72728−72735. (35) Zhou, X.; Li, X.; Sun, H.; Sun, P.; Liang, X.; Liu, F.; Hu, X.; Lu, G. Nanosheet-Assembled ZnFe2O4 Hollow Microspheres for HighSensitive Acetone Sensor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 15414− 15421. (36) Zhang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Guo, W.; Chen, S. The α-Fe2O3/g-CN heterostructural nanocomposites with enhanced ethanol gas sensing performance. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 685, 84−90. (37) Chen, G.; Ji, S.; Li, H.; Kang, X.; Chang, S.; Wang, Y.; Yu, G.; Lu, J.; Claverie, J.; Sang, Y.; Liu, H. High-Energy Faceted SnO2-Coated TiO2 Nanobelt Heterostructure for Near-Ambient TemperatureResponsive Ethanol Sensor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 24950−24956. (38) Wang, Z.; Tian, Z.; Han, D.; Gu, F. Highly Sensitive and Selective Ethanol Sensor Fabricated with In-Doped 3DOM ZnO. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 5466−5474. (39) Wang, C.; Cui, X.; Liu, J.; Zhou, X.; Cheng, X.; Sun, P.; Hu, X.; Li, X.; Zheng, J.; Lu, G. Design of Superior Ethanol Gas Sensor Based on Al-Doped NiO Nanorod-Flowers. ACS Sens. 2016, 1, 131−136. (40) Shao, S.; Koehn, R.; Wu, H.; Wu, T.; Rao, W.-F. Generation of highly ordered nanoporous Sb−SnO2 thin films with enhanced ethanol sensing performance at low temperature. New J. Chem. 2016, 40, 5523−5530. (41) Zhang, R.; Zhou, T.; Wang, L.; Lou, Z.; Deng, J.; Zhang, T. The synthesis and fast ethanol sensing properties of core−shell SnO2@ ZnO composite nanospheres using carbon spheres as templates. New J. Chem. 2016, 40, 6796−6802. 3667

DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.7b00479 ACS Omega 2017, 2, 3658−3668

ACS Omega

Article

(42) Tomer, V. K.; Duhan, S. A facile nanocasting synthesis of mesoporous Ag-doped SnO2 nanostructures with enhanced humidity sensing performance. Sens. Actuators, B 2016, 223, 750−760. (43) Zhou, X.; Zhu, Y.; Luo, W.; Ren, Y.; Xu, P.; Elzatahry, A. A.; Cheng, X.; Alghamdi, A.; Deng, Y.; Zhao, D. Chelation-assisted softtemplate synthesis of ordered mesoporous zinc oxides for low concentration gas sensing. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 15064−15071. (44) Xing, R.; Xu, L.; Song, J.; Zhou, C.; Li, Q.; Liu, D.; Song, H. W. Preparation and Gas Sensing Properties of In2O3/Au Nanorods for Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds in Exhaled Breath. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, No. 10717. (45) Sebok, D.; Janovák, L.; Kovács, D.; Sápi, A.; Dobó, D. G.; Kukoveczb, Á .; Kónyab, Z.; Dékány, I. Room temperature ethanol sensor with sub-ppm detection limit: Improving the optical response by using mesoporous silica foam. Sens. Actuators, B 2017, 243, 1205. (46) Li, X. J.; Chen, S. J.; Feng, C. Y. Characterization of silicon nanoporous pillar array as room-temperature capacitive ethanol gas sensor. Sens. Actuators, B 2007, 123, 461. (47) Zhu, Z.; Kao, C.-T.; Wu, R.-J. A highly sensitive ethanol sensor based on Ag@TiO2 nanoparticles at room temperature. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 320, 348. (48) Renitta, A.; Vijayalakshmi, K. A novel room temperature ethanol sensor based on catalytic Fe activated porous WO3 microspheres. Catal. Commun. 2016, 73, 58. (49) Qu, F.; Yuan, Y.; Guarecuco, R.; Yang, M. Low WorkingTemperature Acetone Vapor Sensor Based on Zinc Nitride and Oxide Hybrid Composites. Small 2016, 12, 3128−3133. (50) Deng, J.; Yu, B.; Lou, Z.; Wang, L.; Wang, R.; Zhang, T. Facile synthesis and enhanced ethanol sensing properties of the brush-like ZnO−TiO2 heterojunctions nanofibers. Sens. Actuators, B 2013, 184, 21. (51) Tomer, V. K.; Devi, S.; Malik, R.; Nehra, S. P.; Duhan, S. Highly sensitive and selective sensors to volatile organic amines (VOAs) using mesoporous WO3-SnO2 nanohybrids. Sens. Actuators, B 2016, 229, 321−330. (52) Malik, R.; Tomer, V. K.; Chaudhary, V.; Dahiya, M. S.; Rana, P. S.; Nehra, S. P.; Nehra, S. P.; Duhan, S. Facile Synthesis of Hybridized Mesoporous Au@TiO2/SnO2 as Efficient Photocatalyst and Selective VOC Sensor. ChemistrySelect 2016, 1, 3247−3258. (53) Xu, L.; Xing, R.; Song, J.; Xu, W.; Song, H. ZnO−SnO2 nanotubes surface engineered by Ag nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, and highly enhanced HCHO gas sensing properties. J. Mater. Chem. C 2013, 1, 2174. (54) Zhang, Z.; Song, H.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, J.; Bao, W.; Zhao, Q.; Wu, X. Selective epichlorohydrin-sensing performance of Ag nanoparticles decorated porous SnO2 architectures. CrystEngComm 2014, 16, 110−115.

3668

DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.7b00479 ACS Omega 2017, 2, 3658−3668