Nickel Based Membrane Electrodes Enable High Rate

Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF DURHAM

Energy and the Environment

Nickel Based Membrane Electrodes Enable High Rate Electrochemical Ammonia Recovery Dianxun Hou, Arpita Iddya, Xi Chen, Mengyuan Wang, Wenli Zhang, Yifu Ding, David Jassby, and Zhiyong Jason Ren Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b01349 • Publication Date (Web): 25 Jun 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on June 26, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39

Environmental Science & Technology

Nickel Based Membrane Electrodes Enable High Rate Electrochemical Ammonia Recovery by Dianxun Hou1, Arpita Iddya2, Xi Chen1, Mengyuan Wang3, Wenli Zhang4, Yifu Ding3, David Jassby2, Zhiyong Jason Ren1 * 1. Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80303, USA 2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States 3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA 4. Materials Science and Engineering, Physical Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 239556900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

* Corresponding author address: Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA; Tel: +1 (303) 492 4137; Fax: +1 (303) 492 7317; E-mail: [email protected]

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment


40

Abstract

41

Wastewater contains significant amounts of nitrogen that can be recovered and

42

valorized as fertilizers and chemicals. This study presents a new membrane electrode

43

coupled with microbial electrolysis that demonstrates very efficient ammonia recovery

44

from synthetic centrate. The process utilizes the electrical potential across electrodes to

45

drive NH4+ ions towards the hydrophilic nickel top layer on a gas-stripping membrane

46

cathode, which takes advantage of surface pH increase to realize spontaneous NH3

47

separation and recovery using the membrane electrode structure. Compared with a

48

control configuration with conventionally separated electrode and hydrophobic

49

membrane, the integrated membrane electrode showed 40% higher in NH3-N recovery

50

rate (36.2 ± 1.2 gNH3-N/m2/d) and 11% higher in current density. The energy

51

consumption was 1.61 ± 0.03 kWh/kgNH3-N, which was 20% lower than the control and

52

70-90% more efficient than competing electrochemical nitrogen recovery processes (5-

53

12 kWh/kgNH3-N). Besides, the negative potential on membrane electrode repelled

54

negatively charged organics and microbes thus reduced fouling. In addition to

55

describing the system’s performance, we explored the underlying mechanisms

56

governing the reactions, which confirmed the viability of this process for efficient

57

wastewater ammonia recovery. Furthermore, the nickel-based membrane electrode

58

showed excellent water entry pressure (∼41 kPa) without leakage, which was much

59

higher than PTFE/PDMS based cathodes (~1.8 kPa). The membrane electrode also

60

showed superb flexibility (180o bend) and can be easily fabricated at low cost (1100 mgNH3-N/L), total Kjeldahl

86

nitrogen (TKN, >1300 mgN/L), orthophosphate (>200 mgPO4-P/L), and organics (up to

87

2000 mg/L)

88

primary treatment units. However, the small volume of centrate (< 1% total volume) can

89

contribute up to 30% of nutrient loading, as well as elevated energy demand, pipe

90

scaling (from struvite), which leads to an increase in the environmental footprint of

91

mainstream treatment facilities12, 13. Therefore, direct ammonia recovery from centrate

92

represents a good opportunity for wastewater nutrient recovery.

11

. Generally, wastewater treatment plants recycle centrate back to the

93 94

Air stripping, ion exchange, and membrane processes have been used for ammonia

95

recovery from wastewater

96

demand and/or require large quantities of chemicals for regeneration

97

many of these technologies have low selectivity. Besides ammonium, phosphate and

98

other non-nutrient ions (e.g., Na+, Cl-) are also recovered and mixed with ammonium,

99

which downgrades product quality, reduces efficiency

14-17

. However, these technologies suffer from high energy

13, 19-23

2, 18

. Moreover,

and leads to scaling (e.g.,

21, 22, 24

100

struvite)

. In this regard, electrochemical processes carry a good advantage for

101

product selection by utilizing low-cost electrons to realize phase separation

102

an electrochemical system, the electrolysis of water produces hydroxide ions on the


10, 20, 25-28

. In

Page 5 of 30


29, 30

103

cathode

. By separating the anode and cathode using an ion exchange membrane

104

(IEM), the high pH in the cathode chamber can drive the conversion of ammonium ion

105

(NH4+) to ammonia (NH3), which can be recovered using air stripping or gas-permeable

106

hydrophobic membranes 13, 19, 31. Based on this hypothesis, Kuntke et al. firstly achieved

107

ammonia recovery (3.29 gNH3-N/m2/d) from a membrane electrode assembly (MEA) air

108

cathode in a microbial fuel cell (MFC) via gas diffusion

109

fabricated at low cost, such gas diffusion structure was generally thick (>1 mm) with low

110

flexibility, and it could not withhold high water pressure ( 99%) with the COD in the

302

recovery solution maintained below 10 mg/L.

10, 25, 28, 58

. The ammonia recovery rate and energy

2, 10, 25, 36, 58

. The membrane

303 304

The higher performance observed in Run 3 was believed to be associated with the

305

mutual benefits caused by the active ammonia harvesting at the membrane electrode

306

surface, which alleviated the accumulation of NH3/OH- and reduced cathode over-

307

potential

308

According to the Nernst equation (Section S10 in SI), increasing pH by one unit can

309

lead to an increase of over-potential by 59 mV. Therefore, the low catholyte pH in Run 3

27, 59

; this, in turn, led to a higher current density and ammonia recovery.



310

might have reduced the apparent over-potential by 17.7 and 75.5 mV compared to Run

311

2 and Run 1, respectively. In order to further illustrate the effect of active ammonia

312

recovery on the over-potential, the membrane electrode was operated with and without

313

active ammonia recovery (Figure 3B). It was shown that the over-potential difference

314

was 0.11 V, suggesting that at a same current density, the actual pH on the electrode

315

surface with active ammonia recovery was 1.86 lower than that operated without

316

ammonia recovery. It is interesting to note that the pH variance at the cathode surface

317

was larger than that of the bulk (1.28, Figure S10A). This indicated that the pH

318

difference between the cathode surface and bulk solution during ammonia recovery was

319

comparatively lower than that without ammonia recovery. The reduced pH gradient was

320

due to the active ammonia harvesting, which could effectively remove ammonia from

321

the electrode surface thus altered the NH4+/NH3 equilibrium and mitigated the

322

accumulation of NH3/OH- on the electrode surface. The reduced pH on the electrode

323

surface hence mitigated cathodic potential losses and might theoretically enhance the

324

overall electrical efficiency by 8.8% 30, 60.

325 326

3.3. Ammonia Mass Balance and Mechanism for Improved Recovery

327

Figure 3 shows the overall mass balance of the NH3-N present in different operating

328

conditions. While for all runs good mass balances were achieved, the NH3-N transport

329

in different runs varied significantly. Driven by the current, NH4+ was continuously

330

transported from the anolyte to the catholyte (Figure 3A) and the loss rate in the anolyte

331

was positively correlated with the current in the reactor (Figure 3C). This is in

332

agreement with our previous findings in microbial resource recovery, in which ion


Page 14 of 30

Page 15 of 30


333

transport was determined by the current as well as its relative abundance in the solution

334

21

335

chamber can be balanced with the NH3-N increase in the cathode chamber. However,

336

up to 85 mg NH3-N overall loss from the system was observed, presumably due to the

337

formation of struvite precipitate due to increased cathode pH

338

the corresponding loss of PO4-P (Figure S9).

. For Run 1 without ammonia harvesting, most of the NH3-N loss in the anode

13, 24

; this is supported by

339 340

In contrast, when ammonia harvesting was applied in Run 2 and Run 3, NH3-N

341

concentrations dropped in both the anolyte and catholyte. This simultaneous drop was

342

due to the ammonia harvesting from the cathode to the recovery solution (Figure 3A).

343

Overall, in Run 3, where the cathode chamber was equipped with the membrane

344

electrode (on which NH4+-N was electro-adsorbed and pH was much higher than the

345

bulk pH 61, 62), the direct deprotonation and capture greatly enhanced ammonia recovery

346

by 40% as compared to Run 2. Benefiting from the active ammonia recovery using the

347

membrane electrode, the local pH on the membrane electrode surface was lowered,

348

which reduced the cathodic potential loss (Figure 3B) and enhanced current production

349

(Figure 2). Moreover, the catholyte bulk pH was also maintained below 8.06 during Run

350

3 (Figure S10A), which mitigated ammonia/phosphate precipitation (Figure S11).

351 352

Importantly, the ammonia recovery in Run 3 was directly correlated with the current, as

353

shown in Figure 3D. This is likely because NH4+ ions served as proton shuttles during

354

operation 17, 22, 62, in which NH4+ ions carried protons to the membrane electrode surface,

355

and lost protons when they were converted to NH3. In this study, the NH4+ ions



Page 16 of 30

356

accounted for 36.9±0.7% of all proton shuttles, which agreed with the findings from a

357

previous study 62.

358 359

During MEC operation, the effective concentration (Ceffective,i) of a cation on the electrode

360

surface can be determined using the Nernst-Plank equation

361

are pulled via diffusion and migration from the bulk solution and accumulate at the

362

electrode-solution interface, where NH4+ concentration is higher than that in the bulk

363

(Figure 4)

364

accumulates on the electrode surface, leading to localized pH increase and the

365

deprotonation of NH4+ 29, 30. Researchers previously employed hydrophobic membranes

366

for ammonia recovery from the catholyte

367

NH3/OH- from the cathode surface to the bulk largely governed the cathodic potential

368

losses thus current production, which may reduce the overall recovery performance

369

Moreover, buffer ions (e.g., HCO3- and HPO42-) can further reduce the efficiency by

370

countering catholyte pH change

371

we took advantage of the local pH increase on the membrane cathode surface to

372

enable in situ NH3 generation and separation, which mitigated over-potential and

373

eliminated the transport limitation of NH3/OH- from the cathode surface to the bulk for

374

further recovery

375

OH- and promoted NH4+ transport from the bulk toward the electrode to enable

376

continuously high efficient NH3 harvesting (Figure 4). The active ammonia recovery also

377

reduced the electrode-solution interface pH, which reduced the over-potential

378

associated with electrolysis and enhanced current production 30.

63

. Accordingly, NH4+ ions

64

. Due to water reduction during electrolysis on the MEC cathode, OH-

30, 37

26, 35

, but the diffusion and/or migration of

30

.

and decreasing the ammonia fraction. In this study,

30

. This approach enhanced the local generation and consumption of


Page 17 of 30


379 380

In addition to ammonia, hydrogen gas was also recovered from the system. In Run 1

381

without ammonia recovery, the system was operated similarly to a traditional two-

382

chamber MEC with a nickel foam cathode, so H2 was stably produced at 0.15 ± 0.01

383

m3-H2/m3/d with a cathode efficiency of 100 ± 7%. The cathodic efficiency was

384

approximately 40% higher than our previously reported result in a single-chamber MEC

385

47

386

cathode efficiency to 0.13 ± 0.02 m3-H2/m3/d and 75 ± 9%, respectively, though the

387

current was much higher as shown in Figure 2 and Table S3. However, with active

388

ammonia recovery using the membrane electrode, Run 3 exhibited improved H2

389

production rate (0.19 ± 0.01 m3-H2/m3/d) and cathode efficiency (85 ± 2%) than Run 2.

390

The variation of H2 production is believed to be associated with ammonia recovery thus

391

pH and free ammonia in the catholyte, which can greatly affect the activities of hydrogen

392

consumption microbes (e.g., sulfate reducing bacteria and methanogens)

393

discussions can be found in Section S13 in SI.

394

3.4. Low Fouling Behavior

395

Figure 5 shows the membrane surface in Run 2 and membrane electrode in Run 3

396

following the ammonia harvesting experiments. The bare PP membrane used in Run 2

397

displayed a yellowish color (Figure S7C), and its SEM images with EDX analysis

398

showed the presence of organic fouling with significant crystal deposition (Figure 5A).

399

The deposited organics reduced the porosity of the PP membrane (Figure 5A-2)

400

which could reduce the ammonia recovery efficiency. A more severe issue on PP

401

membrane in Run 2 can be membrane wetting, which can result from organic matter

. It is interesting to note that ammonia recovery in Run 2 reduced H2 production and


65, 66

. Detailed

67

,


Page 18 of 30

402

depositing inside the membrane’s pores.68 This can result in the acid leaking and

403

reduced gas separation. In contrast, the membrane electrode in Run 3 did not suffer

404

from organic fouling (Figure 5B-1 and Figure S7A-2). This benefit may be a result of the

405

negative potential on the membrane electrode during operation, which repelled the

406

negatively charged organics and/or microbes

407

nickel thin layer greatly reduced the roughness (~35 nm vs ~120 nm of the PP

408

membrane, Figure S3) and hydrophobicity (CA: 21.4±0.5°, Table S1) of the composite

409

membrane electrode, both of which help mitigate organic fouling and biofouling

410

However, the membrane electrode did show inorganic scaling (Figure S7A-2 and Figure

411

5B-1), which, based on XPS analysis, was found to be similar to the composition of

412

NH4MgPO4 (struvite)

413

believed to be attributed to the heterogeneous/surface crystallization on the electrode

414

surface, which was exacerbated by the pH change due to electrolysis

415

electrolysis, the negative potential can promote the formation of an electric double layer

416

on the membrane surface

417

adsorbs cations (e.g., NH4+ and Mg2+)

418

fouling and promoting ammonium transfer, the side effect is the increased pH due to

419

OH- accumulation, which could promote crystallization

420

scaling did not significantly hinder the performance of the membrane electrode, with

421

current production dropped from 61.2 to 56.5 mA (7.7%), and ammonia recovery

422

decreased from 37.4 to 34.9 gNH3-N/m2/d (6.8%) , respectively, in 7 batches (Figure 2

423

and Figure 3A). Moreover, the deposited crystals only appeared on the membrane

24, 70

39, 40

. In addition, the electrodeposited

17, 69

.

and/or Mg3(PO4)2 or Ca3(PO4)2 71, 72 (Figure S8A). This was

70-72

. During

73, 74

. Though the double layer repels anions and but also 74

. Even though it has benefits of anti-organic


71, 72

. Fortunately, inorganic

Page 19 of 30


424

surface and was easily cleaned with 0.1% H2SO4 (Figure 5B-2, Figure S7A-3 and

425

Figure S8A).

426 427

3.5. Implications and Outlook

428

The study demonstrated in both reaction mechanisms and lab scale experiments that

429

the nickel based membrane electrodes can achieve high rates of electrochemically-

430

driven ammonia recovery. The layered structure enabled both efficient catalysis on the

431

hydrophilic side and gas separation on the hydrophobic side, and the negative potential

432

and local OH- accumulation reduced fouling and facilitated ammonia generation. In

433

addition to the data presented, we also found the membrane electrode endured higher

434

water pressure (41.4 ± 0.4 kPa) than traditional air cathodes (∼12 kPa for PVDF based

435

cathode, and 0.18 ± 0.02 m for PTFE and PDMS based cathodes)

436

enter pressure was able to prevent gas channel flooding and grant the membrane

437

electrode better scalability or modulation (Section S5 in SI). Furthermore, the

438

membrane electrode was very thin (

Nickel Based Membrane Electrodes Enable High Rate

Recommend Documents