Subscriber access provided by Kaohsiung Medical University
Energy, Environmental, and Catalysis Applications
Nickel Molybdenum Nitride Nanorods Grown on Ni Foam as Efficient and Stable Bifunctional Electrocatalysts for Overall Water Splitting Jun-Ran Jia, Meng-Ke Zhai, Jing-Jing Lv, Bao-Xun Zhao, Hongbin Du, and Jun-Jie Zhu ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b09854 • Publication Date (Web): 20 Aug 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on August 20, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
3
Nickel Molybdenum Nitride Nanorods Grown on Ni Foam as Efficient and Stable Bifunctional Electrocatalysts for Overall Water Splitting
4
JunRan Jia,[a] MengKe Zhai,[a] JingJing Lv,[b] BaoXun Zhao,[a] HongBin Du,*[a] JunJie Zhu*[b]
1 2
5
[a]State Key Laboratory of Coordination Chemistry, Collaborative Innovation Center of
6
Chemistry for Life Sciences, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing
7
University, Nanjing, 210023, China. Email:
[email protected] 8
[b]State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science, School of Chemistry and
9
Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China. Email:
[email protected] 10
KEYWORDS: Water splitting • Electrocatalysts • Metal nitride • Hydrogen evolution • Oxygen
11
evolution
12
ABSTRACT: Non-noble-metal electrocatalysts for water splitting hold great promises for
13
developing sustainable and clean energy sources. Herein, a highly efficient bifunctional electrode
14
consisting of Ni-doped molybdenum nitride nanorods on Ni foam is prepared through topotactic
15
transformation of NiMoO4 nanorods that are in situ hydrothermally grown on Ni foam. The
16
electrode not only contains rich, accessible, electrochemically active sites, but also possesses
17
extraordinary chemical stability. It exhibits excellent hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and
18
oxygen evolution reaction (OER) performance in 1.0 M KOH with low overpotentials of 15 mV
19
and 218 mV, respectively, at a current density of 10 mA cm−2, superior to the commercial
20
benchmark materials Pt/C and RuO2 under the same condition. A simple water electrolyzer using
21
the obtained electrode as both the anode and cathode needs a very low cell potential of 1.49 V to
22
reach a current density of 10 mA cm−2 and maintains stability for 110 h without degradation. The
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
1
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 2 of 28
23
excellent performance of the electrode could be attributed to the formation of highly conductive,
24
corrosion- and oxidation-resistant metal nitrides and the synergetic effect between intimately
25
interconnected, electrochemically active nickel molybdenum nitride and Ni or NiO
26
nanoparticles. This study shows that the use of transition metal nitrides in combination of
27
nanostructured heterojunctions of multiple active components enables one to develop highly
28
stable and efficient water electrolyzers without precious metals. The preparative strategy used in
29
this work could be applied to devise new electrocatalysts.
30
1. INTRODUCTION
31
The catalytic electrolysis of water via hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen
32
evolution reaction (OER) provides a potential solution to the challenge of developing clean and
33
sustainable energy sources.1,2 The major difficulty in water electrolysis is to reduce the large
34
overpotentials in water-splitting electrolyzer, which highly depend on the interfaces,
35
microstructures and elemental compositions of the electrocatalysts.3 RuO2 and Pt/C are the state-
36
of-the-art catalysts for OER and HER, respectively, which have already been commercialized4,5.
37
However, the noble metals are scare in earth crust and expensive, which have limited their
38
applications. Recently, extensive research has been carried out on the use of earth-abundant
39
transition metals6 and their derivatives (e.g. oxides,7-9 hydroxides,10-13carbides,14-18nitrides,19-22
40
phosphides,23-27, boride28, selenides29 and sulfides30) as water-splitting electrocatalysts, some of
41
which have shown promising HER or OER activities. However, most of the state-of-the-art non-
42
noble metal electrocatalysts usually do not perform well over a long period of time under harsh
43
operating conditions (such as pH, high electrode potentials) due to the corrosion and/or oxidation.
44
The development of inexpensive and efficient non-noble metal electrocatalysts for HER and,
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
2
Page 3 of 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
45
particularly, OER, remains a challenge.31-33 Moreover, it is also desirable to develop highly
46
efficient bifunctional noble-metal-free electrocatalysts for construction of simplified water-
47
splitting electrolyzers.
48
Bimetallic alloys (e.g. NiCo, FeCo, NiFe, NiMo, etc.) and derivatives have been known to
49
possess better HER or OER electrocatalytic activities than the single ones owing to the
50
synergistic effect of the two active components.7,10,19,21,30 38 The presence of a second metal atom
51
in bimetallic alloys could offer more reaction sites and enhance the electronic conductivity.
52
Moreover, bimetallic alloys allow adjustability on the elemental composition ratio, which affords
53
great potential on regulating chemical properties. For instance, Ni atoms are identified as
54
efficient water splitting centres, while Mo atoms are thought to have strong binding effects
55
towards hydrogen. Upon alloying, the bonding strength of the Mo−H bond in NiMo catalysts is
56
effectively reduced due to the presence of nickel atoms, so the dissociation and desorption of
57
hydrogen proceed smoothly and the HER reactivity is greatly improved.6 However, like most
58
electrocatalysts, the alloys usually suffer degradation because of corrosion and/or oxidation
59
under applied electrode potentials in a strongly acidic or basic electrolyte solution.
60
Transition metal nitrides have recently been showed high catalytic activities for water
61
splitting due to their unique physical and chemical properties.15,34 The incorporation of nitrogen
62
atoms alters the d band structure of the original metal, making it more resembling the electronic
63
structure of the noble metal catalyst and thus improving the electrocatalytic activities.16 On the
64
other hand , due to its small radius, the nitrogen atom tends to occupy the interstitial sites in the
65
original close-packed lattice of metal atoms when forming the nitrides. The modified lattice not
66
only allows transition metal nitrides to have higher electrical conductivity, but also better
67
corrosion and oxidation resistance. As a result, transition metal nitrides have showed advantages
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
3
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 4 of 28
68
in water splitting over pure metals or metal alloys.21 For instance, Ni3N nanosheets were found to
69
be great OER catalyst in KOH solution, attributable to the formation of highly electrochemically
70
active NiOOH on the surface.35 Ni3N-Ni0.2Mo0.8N nanosheets and nanotubes showed
71
considerable improvement on both HER and OER.36,37.Ni-Ni0.2Mo0.8N nanoparticles were also
72
demonstrated to have good HER property.38 The latter two consisted of heterostructures of two
73
active ingredients, which provided synergetic effects to further improve the electrocatalytic
74
performance.
75
Herein we report the designed synthesis of a highly efficient bifunctional nickel molybdenum
76
nitride nanorod electrocatalyst grown on Ni foam (denoted as
[email protected]) for water
77
splitting. The catalyst is devised by taking advantage of the synergistic effect of the multiple
78
active components, highly conductive and corrosion-resistant nature of metal nitride and
79
integrated 1-dimensional (1-D) nanostructures that consist of interconnecting electrochemically-
80
active nanoparticles to minimize resistance potentials. The resulting
[email protected] 81
exhibits exceptional HER and OER performance in 1.0 M KOH, both of which surpass the
82
commercial benchmark materials Pt/C and RuO2 under the same condition.
83
2. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
84
Materials. Nickel nitrate hexahydrate, ammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate (AHM),
85
potassium hydroxide and hydrochloric acid were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent
86
Co. Ltd. Nickel foam (thickness 1.6 mm, 40 PPI) was purchased from Long Sheng Bao Kunshan
87
Electronic Materials Co. Ltd. Commercial Pt/C (20 wt%) were purchased from Shanghai
88
Macklin Biochemical Co. Ltd. RuO2 (99.9 %) was purchased from Aladdin industrial
89
Corporation. All reagents were used as received without further purification.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
4
Page 5 of 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
90
Synthesis of
[email protected]. In order to synthesize the
[email protected] 91
electrocatalyst, NiMoO4 nanorods were first hydrothermally grown on Ni foam according to the
92
literature.39-41 In a typical preparation, Ni foam was first cut into 4 × 4 cm2 pieces and
93
successively cleaned in ethanol, 3 M HCl solution and deionized water. Then, one piece of Ni
94
foam was placed into a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave. 80 mL of deionized water
95
containing AHM (0.01 M) and Ni(NO3)2·6H2O (0.05 M) were immediately added into the
96
autoclave to prevent Ni foam being oxidized. Next, the autoclave was sealed and heated at 160
97
°C for 6 h. After cooled to room temperature, the substrate (denoted as Nifoam@NiMoO4) was
98
washed with deionized water and then dried under an infrared light. The loading mass of the
99
formed NiMoO4 nanorods on nickel foam was estimated as ∼46.3 mg cm–2. For nitridation, the
100
obtained yellow nickel foam plate was put in a tube furnace and heated at 550 °C for 3 h in a
101
flowing NH3 atmosphere to form the
[email protected] electrocatalyst. The loading weight
102
of the formed Ni0.2Mo0.8N nanorods on nickel foam was estimated as ∼42.0 mg cm–2.
103
Synthesis of Nifoam@Ni4Mo/MoO2. Nifoam@Ni4Mo/MoO2 was synthesized by following the
104
same procedure except for changing NH3 to H2/Ar (10 : 90 v/v) and the calcination temperature
105
set at 550°C to 500°C according to the reference.6 SEM images showed nanorods grown on Ni
106
foam (Figure S1), which consist of Ni, Mo and O with an atomic ratio of 0.30 : 0.46 : 1.00.
107
XRPD and XPS analyses revealed the formation of Ni4Mo and MoO2 on Ni foam (Figure S1).
108
The loading mass of the formed Ni4Mo/MoO2 nanorods on nickel foam was estimated as
109
∼43.6 mg cm–2. It is noted that the freshly prepared Ni4Mo/MoO2 nanorods are highly reactive
110
and easily oxidized in air (e.g. burst into flame even cooled down to room temperature), which
111
need passivation in Ar atmosphere for several hours to prevent bursting into flame.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
5
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 6 of 28
112
Synthesis of Nifoam@Ni3N. Nifoam@Ni3N was synthesized by high temperature nitridation of
113
Ni(OH)2 precursor on nickel foam, which was synthesized by following the reported method:42 A
114
piece of cleaned Ni foam (4 × 4 cm2) was immersed into 80 mL of HCl solution (pH = 3.0) and
115
heated at 180°C for 6 h to produce Ni(OH)2 nanosheets anchored Ni foam. The resulted nickel
116
foam plate was then put in a tube furnace and heated at 550 °C for 2 h under a flowing NH3
117
atmosphere. SEM images showed nanosheets grown on Ni foam (Figure S2a). EDS and XRPD
118
analysis revealed the formation of Ni3N on Ni foam (Figures S2b-c). The loading mass of the
119
formed Ni3N nanosheets on nickel foam was estimated as ∼25.1 mg cm–2.
120
Physical Methods. X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) patterns were recorded on a Bruker D8-
121
Advance diffractometer using Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å) at 40 kV and 40 mA with a scan
122
rate of 0.1 s/step. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images and Energy-dispersive spectrum
123
(EDS) were recorded on a Hitachi S-4800 field emission scanning electron microscope.
124
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution (HR) TEM images were collected
125
on a JEM-2100 instrument (Japan). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra were
126
obtained on a PHI 5000 Versa Probe instrument. The binding energy was calibrated against the C
127
1s peak energy of 284.6 eV. FT-IR spectra were collected on a Nicolet 6700 instrument (USA).
128
Electrochemical measurements. The electrochemical tests were carried out on a CHI 660D
129
electrochemical workstation (Chenhua, China) in a three-electrode system. The electrocatalyst-
130
loaded Ni foam (1 × 1 cm2 in sizes) was directly used as a working electrode, while a graphite
131
rod was used as the counter electrode and a Hg/HgO electrode as the reference electrode. Linear
132
sweep voltammetry (LSV) and cyclic voltammetry (CV) were measured in a N2-saturated (for
133
HER) or O2-saturated (for OER) KOH (1.0 M) solution with a scan rate of 1 mV s–1.
134
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were recorded with operating overpotentials set
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
6
Page 7 of 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
135
at +0.2 V (OER) and −0.2 V (HER).43 The frequency ranges from 100000 to 0.01 Hz. For overall
136
water splitting,
[email protected] was employed as both the cathode and the anode in a
137
two-electrode system. All the electrochemical data were converted according to the equation:
138
Potential (vs. RHE) = Emeasured,
139
according to the equation: Ecompensated = Emeasured – iRs (Rs is the series resistance determined by
140
EIS).44 Long-term durability tests were carried out at a current density of 10 mA cm–2 without iR
141
compensation. The double-layer capacitances (Cdl) were measured, according to the reported
142
method in Ref. 45, by conducting cyclic voltammograms (CVs) in 1.0 M KOH with different
143
scan rates from 20 to 300 mV s−1 in a potential window of 1.025 to 1.125 V (vs. RHE). The
144
capacitor charging current jc and discharging current ja at 1.075 V were plotted vs. the scan rate v
145
according to the equation: |j| = v × Cdl, where Cdl was the slope of the linear fit.
vs. Hg/HgO
+ 0.059 pH + 0.098 V. The test data were corrected
146
The rotating ring-disk electrode (RRDE) voltammograms were collected to determine the
147
Faraday efficiency, using a RRDE configuration (Pine Research Instrumentation, USA)
148
comprised of a glassy carbon disk electrode and a platinum ring electrode. The Nifoam@Ni-
149
Ni0.2Mo0.8N was peeled off from nickel foam and then coated onto RRDE with Nafion as the
150
binder (catalyst loading: 0.28 mg cm-2). Rotation rate was maintained at 1000 rpm. The O2/H2
151
produced by OER/HER on the surface of glassy carbon disk can easily diffuse to the platinum
152
ring electrode in such high rotating speed. The ring potential of the RRDE was kept constantly at
153
1.2 V (HER) and 0.4 V (OER) vs. RHE to reduce the H2/O2 produced from catalyst on the disk
154
electrode in 1.0 M KOH solution. The electron transfer number (N) can be calculated from the
155
disk current (Id) and ring current (Ir) of the RRDE: N = n × Id/ (Id+ Ir/N), where n is the
156
theoretical electron transfer number (n = 2 for HER, n = 4 for OER).46 The Faraday efficiency
157
can be calculated as: Faraday efficiency = N / n ×100 %.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
7
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 8 of 28
158
For comparisons of the electrocatalytic properties, the Pt/C and RuO2 electrodes were
159
prepared as follows: 10 mg of catalysts (20 wt% Pt/C and 99.9% RuO2) were dispersed in 900
160
µL of 4 : 1 (v / v) water/ethanol and 100 µL of 0.5 % nafion solution by sonication for 30 min to
161
form a homogeneous ink and then loaded onto a freshly cleaned 1 cm2 Ni foam.
162
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
163
Material Preparation and Characterization.
164
The
[email protected] nanostructures were fabricated by thermal nitridation of
165
Nifoam@NiMoO4, i.e. NiMoO4 nanorods grown on Ni foam. As shown in Figures 1a-b, a dense
166
forest of NiMoO4 nanorods with a diameter of 0.5~1 µm and a length of ~50 µm were in situ
167
grown perpendicularly onto the surface of Ni foam via a simple hydrothermal reaction. X-ray
168
powder diffraction (XRPD) and element mapping analyses showed the nanorods were composed
169
of crystalline NiMoO4·xH2O (JCPDS card no. 13-0128) and NiMoO4 (JCPDS card no. 33-0948)
170
(Figures S3 and S4). After heated at 550°C in an ammonia atmosphere, the golden color of
171
Nifoam@NiMoO4 turned black (Figure S5), implying successful nitridation.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
8
Page 9 of 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
172 173
Figure 1. SEM images of (a, b) Nifoam@NiMoO4, and (c, d)
[email protected]. (e) Element
174
mapping and (f) HRTEM images of
[email protected]. Insert shows the SAED pattern.
175
As depicted in Figures 1c-d, the morphology of the
[email protected] remained the
176
same as the precursor Nifoam@NiMoO4 after nitridation at high temperature. Element mapping
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
9
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 10 of 28
177
images showed that Mo, Ni, and N were uniformly distributed in the nanorods (Figure 1e).
178
Energy-dispersive spectrum (EDS) suggested that the nanarods mainly consisted of Mo, Ni, N
179
and O, with an atomic ratio of Ni/Mo/N/O close to 0.88 : 0.88 : 1 : 0.88 (Figure S6). XRPD
180
analyses confirmed the successful nitridation (Figure S7). The four broad diffraction peaks at
181
36.49°, 49.41°, 65.32° and 74.91° were related to the (200), (202), (220) and (222) planes of
182
Ni0.2Mo0.8N (JCPDS card No. 29-0931). The diffraction peaks at 44.53°, 51.90°, and 76.36° were
183
due to Ni (JCPDS card No. 04-0850), which were resulted from reduction of NiMoO4 by NH3
184
during nitridation and from the Ni foam substrate as well. In addition, NiO (JCPDS card No. 47-
185
1049) was also present in the nanorods, which was likely due to the oxidation of Ni nanoparticles
186
upon exposure to air. The average crystallite sizes of Ni0.2Mo0.8N, Ni and NiO were calculated as
187
11, 9 and 15 nm, respectively, based on the Scherrer equation. High-resolution transmission
188
electron microscopy (HR-TEM) images revealed that the nanorods consisted of randomly
189
distributed, interconnecting crystallites of ca. 5–15 nm in sizes, the lattice fringes of which could
190
be attributed to those of Ni0.2Mo0.8N, Ni or NiO (Figures 1f and S8). Consistently, the selected
191
area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns showed the diffraction spots belonging to these species.
192
The above results suggested that after nitridation, the nanorods were converted into
193
interconnecting Ni0.2Mo0.8N nano crystallites decorated by partially oxidized Ni nanoparticles.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
10
Page 11 of 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
194 195
Figure 2. XPS spectra of
[email protected]: (a) survey scan, (b) Ni 2p, (c) Mo 3d, and (d)
196
N 1s regions.
197
The XPS survey spectra of
[email protected] revealed the presence of Mo, Ni, O and
198
N (Figure 2a), in agreement with the element mapping results. The Ni 2p3/2 XPS spectrum
199
showed a strong peak of the metallic Ni0 at 852.7 eV, accompanied by a slightly weaker peak of
200
the divalent Ni2+ at 855.6 eV (Figure 2b). The former was due to the Ni nanoparticles reduced
201
from NiMoO4 and the Ni substrate, while the latter likely came from NiO owing to partial
202
oxidation of Ni0. The strong peak at 229.0 in the Mo 3d XPS spectrum (Figure 2c) could be
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
11
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 12 of 28
203
deconvoluted into two peaks at 229.0 eV and 229.8 eV, respectively, which belonged to MoIII
204
3d5/2 and MoIV 3d5/2. The slightly weaker peak at 232.2 eV was attributable to the overlap of
205
MoVI 3d5/2, MoIII 3d3/2 and MoIV 3d3/2. There were trace amounts of MoVI species (i.e. Mo 3d5/2
206
peak at 232.2 eV and 3d3/2 peak at 235.4 eV) in the sample, likely due to the oxidized surface Mo
207
species.47,48 The results implied the transformation of MoVI to lower oxidation states during the
208
nitridation at high temperature. The N 1s XPS spectrum gave an asymmetric peak around 396 eV
209
(Figure 2d), which could be deconvoluted into three peaks at 394.8 eV, 397.1 eV and 398.8 eV,
210
respectively. The first peak was due to MoIII 3p3/2, while the second peak was close to the N 1s
211
value expected for the Mo/Ni–N bond (396.7 eV),38 suggesting the formation of metal nitrides.
212
The third peak can be attributed to N-H groups, which implies the formation of N-H species at
213
the surface of the electrocatalyst.37 The XPS results showed that
[email protected] was
214
composed of partially oxidized Ni nanoparticles and nickel molybdenum nitrides on Ni foam,
215
consistent with the XRPD, SEM and TEM results. Quantitative calculations were made to
216
determine the ratio of Ni and Ni0.2Mo0.8N, which is close to 0.6 : 1, consistent with the EDS
217
results (Figure S6).
218
HER Performance
219
The HER and OER properties of
[email protected] were performed in a 1.0 M KOH
220
solution by using a standard three-electrode system, where the
[email protected] foam with
221
dimensions of 1 × 1 cm2 was directly used as the working electrode. Figure 3 shows the linear
222
sweep voltammograms (LSV) for the HER performance of
[email protected], together
223
with those of several reference electrodes, including Nifoam@NiMoO4 (the precursor to
224
[email protected], prepared according to Ref. 39 to 41), Nifoam@Ni4Mo/MoO2 (H2-reduced
225
Nifoam@NiMoO4, a product composed of Ni4Mo/MoO2 nanorods on Ni foam, prepared according
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
12
Page 13 of 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
226
to Ref. 6, Figure S1), and Nifoam@Ni3N (Ni3N nanosheets on Ni foam, prepared according to Ref.
227
41, Figure S2). As shown in Figure 3a,
[email protected] displayed an overpotential (η10)
228
of 15 mV at a current density (j) of 10 mA cm−2, which was much smaller than reference
229
materials Nifoam (263 mV), Nifoam@Ni3N (164 mV), Nifoam@NiMoO4 (262 mV), and
230
Nifoam@Ni4Mo/MoO2 (97 mV). In fact, the extremely low η10 of
[email protected] is one
231
of the lowest amongst the state-of-the-art non-noble-metal-based HER catalysts (Table S1).
232
Notably, the outstanding activity of
[email protected] exceeded that of the commercial
233
benchmark HER catalyst 20% Pt/C supported on Ni foam with a mass loading of 10 mg cm-2,
234
which required an overpotential of 21 mV to achieve j = 10 mA cm−2. Moreover, the Tafel slope
235
of
[email protected] was estimated to be merely 39 mV dec−1, which was also smaller than
236
those of Nifoam@Ni4Mo/MoO2 (162 mV dec−1), Nifoam@NiMoO4 (212 mV dec−1), Nifoam@Ni3N
237
(183 mV dec−1), Nifoam (322 mV dec−1) and even the Pt/C on Nifoam (45 mV dec−1) (Figure 3b).
238
The Faraday efficiencies of
[email protected] determined by using rotating ring-disk
239
electrode (RRDE) voltammograms were 96.75±0.25% (Figure S9a). More importantly, the
240
[email protected] catalyst showed excellent HER stability for 110 h of successive testing
241
with negligible increase in the overpotentials (Figure 3d). To the best of our knowledge, such a
242
low η10 value accompanied with a very small Tafel slope has scarcely been reported for non-
243
noble-metal-based electrocatalysts (Table S1). The above results suggest that Nifoam@Ni-
244
Ni0.2Mo0.8N is one of the most efficient HER electrocatalysts reported to date.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
13
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 14 of 28
245 246
Figure 3. (a) iR-corrected LSV curves, (b) Tafel and (c) Nyquist plots (at η = −200 mV) for
247
HER measured in a N2-saturated 1.0 M KOH solution at a scan rate of 1 mV s–1. (d) Long-term
248
durability of
[email protected] at j = –10 mA cm–2 without iR compensation. The inset
249
shows polarization curves before and after the stability tests.
250
To shed light on the low HER overpotentials of
[email protected], electrochemical
251
impedance spectroscopy (EIS) (Figure 3c) was used to study the charge-transfer resistance (Rct)
252
in these materials. The observed Rct value (5.0 Ω) of
[email protected] was smaller than
253
those of Nifoam@Ni4Mo/MoO2 (18.2 Ω), Nifoam@NiMoO4 (18.2 Ω), Nifoam@Ni3N (5.3 Ω), and
254
Nifoam (27.1 Ω), suggesting rapid electron transport for hydrogen evolution within the electrode
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
14
Page 15 of 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
255
system of
[email protected]. This could be attributed to the formation of highly conductive
256
and electrochemically active metal nitride nanorods and the intergrowth of the nanorods on the
257
Ni foam electrode that allows minimization of interface-resistance potentials.
258 259
Figure 4. (a) iR-corrected LSV curves measured in negative polarization scanning mode, (b)
260
Tafel and (c) Nyquist plots (at η = 200 mV) for OER measured in an O2-satuarated 1.0 M KOH
261
at a scan rate of 1 mV s−1. The insert in (c) shows the enlarged plots. (d) Long-term durability of
262
[email protected] at j = 10 mA cm−2 without iR compensation. The inset in (d) shows the
263
polarization curves before and after the stability tests measured in positive polarization scanning
264
mode.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
15
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
265
Page 16 of 28
OER Performance
266
Figure 4 shows the OER performance of
[email protected] measured in an O2-
267
saturated 1.0 M KOH solution. To achieve a current density of 10 mA cm−2, Nifoam@Ni-
268
Ni0.2Mo0.8N displayed the smallest overpotential of 218 mV amongst the tested materials
269
including Nifoam@Ni4Mo/MoO2 (247 mV), Nifoam@Ni3N (372 mV), Nifoam@NiMoO4 (241 mV),
270
and Nifoam (405 mV), even better than the commercial benchmark material RuO2 supported on Ni
271
foam with a mass loading of 10 mg cm-2 (245 mV). Impressively, the Tafel slope of Nifoam@Ni-
272
Ni0.2Mo0.8N was estimated to be 55 mV dec−1, which was also smaller than those of
273
Nifoam@Ni4Mo/MoO2 (181 mV dec−1), Nifoam@NiMoO4 (133 mV dec−1), Nifoam@Ni3N (81 mV
274
dec−1), Nifoam (110 mV dec−1) and even the RuO2 on Nifoam (66 mV dec−1) (Figure 4b). The OER
275
η10 and Tafel slope of
[email protected] are smaller than most of the state-of-the-art non-
276
precious metal based OER catalysts (Table S2). The Faraday efficiencies of Nifoam@Ni-
277
Ni0.2Mo0.8N determined by using RRDE voltammograms were 96.25±0.75% (Figure S9b).
278
Moreover, the OER performance of
[email protected] remained nearly unchanged after
279
110 h of successive tests at j = 10 mA cm−2 (Figure 4d), demonstrating excellent stability. In
280
contrast, the Nifoam@Ni4Mo/MoO2 and Nifoam@NiMoO4 electrodes underwent severe
281
degradation during the OER tests for a prolonged time (Figures S1 and S10). EIS data (Figure
282
4c) again showed that
[email protected] possessed the smallest Rct in Nyquist plots (1.4 Ω),
283
suggesting that
[email protected] had an excellent electron transport passway for OER.
284
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
16
Page 17 of 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
285 286
Figure 5. Polarization curves of (a)
[email protected] |
[email protected] and (b)
287
Pt/C | RuO2 in a two-electrode system for overall water splitting (measured in negative
288
polarization scanning mode). Inset: Durability of
[email protected] for overall water
289
splitting in 1.0 M KOH at j = 10 mA cm−2.
290
Overall Water-Splitting Performance
291
Encouraged by its excellent HER and OER performance,
[email protected] was used
292
as a bifunctional catalyst for both the anode and cathode in a simple two-electrode system for
293
overall water splitting tests (See video in SI). Figure 5 shows the polarization curve of the
294
bifunctional
[email protected] electrolyzer in 1.0 M KOH. Only a small cell potential of
295
1.49 V (without iR compensation) was needed to achieve a current density of 10 mA cm−2. The
296
cell potential was smaller than those of the commercial RuO2−Pt/C couple (1.53 V at 10 mA cm–
297
2
298
importantly, the
[email protected] bifunctional catalyst showed excellent stability for 110 h
), and most of the state-of-the-art non-noble metal bifunctional electrocatalysts (Table S3). More
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
17
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 18 of 28
299
of successive testing with negligible increase in cell potentials, showing promises for practical
300
applications.
301
Structure and Activity
302
To investigate the structure-and-activity relationship of the high-performance Nifoam@Ni-
303
Ni0.2Mo0.8N electrodes, we fabricated the electrodes under varied preparative conditions and
304
reference materials Nifoam@Ni4Mo/MoO2 and Nifoam@Ni3N for comparison. Figure S11 shows
305
the XRPD patterns epared by varying nitridation time. Ni0.2Mo0.8N nanoparticles were apparently
306
formed within 10 min of heating at 550 ºC in ammonia. When the nitridation time increased from
307
10 min to 5 h, the XRPD peak intensities increased, implying better crystallinity (i.e. larger
308
crystallite sizes) of the samples prepared at prolonged nitridation time. However, even with
309
prolonged nitridation time of 5 h, no obvious XRPD peaks due to Ni3N was observed. In
310
comparison, the formation of Ni3N could be completed in 2 h at 550ºC with Nifoam@Ni(OH)2
311
(Figure S2). The HER and OER tests (Figure S12) showed that the
[email protected] 312
electrode prepared in 10 min of nitridation did not behave well, likely due to incomplete
313
nitridation. Upon increasing the nitridation time to 2 h, the electrode showed the best HER and
314
OER performance, while the electrode prepared in 5 h of nitridation displayed deteriorated
315
performance, probably because of larger crystals of Ni0.2Mo0.8N. The results suggest the
316
electrode prepared by nitridation for 2 h possessed the optimized crystallinity and crystallite
317
sizes.
318
Figure S13 shows the XRPD patterns of
[email protected] prepared by varying
319
nitridation temperature for 2 h. When the temperature increased from 450 °C to 800 °C, the
320
XRPD peaks due to Ni0.2Mo0.8N got stronger, suggesting the formation of larger crystallites of
321
Ni0.2Mo0.8N. Similar to the samples prepared under variable nitridation time, there were no peaks
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
18
Page 19 of 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
322
due to Ni3N observed in all the samples nitrided at 450 °C to 800 °C. The EDS results (Figure
323
S14) show that the nitrogen contents in the samples increased from 3.8 : 2.9 : 1 (Ni : Mo : N
324
atomic ratio) prepared at lower temperature (450 °C) to 1.7 : 1.4: 1 (500 °C), and then reached a
325
maximum of 0.8 : 0.8 : 1 at 550 °C. The compositions of the samples prepared above 550 °C
326
remained the same as those of 550 °C, suggesting the complete nitridation at 550 °C. It is noted
327
that there have been reports that shows the conversion of NiMoO4 nanosheets to Ni3N-
328
Ni0.2Mo0.8N, and NiMoO4 nanoparticles to Ni-Ni0.2Mo0.8N composites.37,38 We did not observe
329
the formation of Ni3N during the nitridation of NiMoO4 nanorods on Nifoam under various
330
conditions by means of XRPD, EDS and HRTEM studies, the reason of which is likely related to
331
the structures of the precursors. As depicted by the LSV curves in Figure S15, the electrode
332
prepared at 550 °C for 2 h presented the best HER and OER performance. The inferior
333
performance of the electrodes prepared at lower and higher temperatures could be attributed to
334
incomplete nitridation or larger crystallite sizes of the electrochemically active components. The
335
electrode prepared by nitridation for 2 h possessed the optimized composition and crystallite
336
sizes.
337
To elucidate the extraordinary HER and OER stabilities of
[email protected], the
338
electrodes after the electrochemical tests were characterized by SEM, XRPD, XPS and infrared
339
spectroscopy studies. As depicted in Figure S16, SEM images showed that the morphology of
340
the
[email protected] electrodes kept intact after both the HER and OER long-term
341
stability tests. XRPD analyses revealed that the two electrodes retained their crystallinity (Figure
342
S17). The Ni 2p XPS spectra of the
[email protected] nanorods showed that surface Ni(0)
343
species turned into Ni(II) due to the oxidation by O2 or water during the HER and OER tests
344
(Figure S18). Detailed analysis of Ni 2p XPS spectra of the
[email protected] electrode
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
19
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 20 of 28
345
after the OER tests revealed that there existed NiIII species (Figure S19b), which likely served as
346
catalytic sites as shown in many Ni-based OER catalysts.49 The N 1s XPS spectra of Nifoam@Ni-
347
Ni0.2Mo0.8N displayed little change before and after long-term stability tests for HER and OER,
348
i.e. the Mo−N bond kept intact. While the Mo 3d XPS spectra of
[email protected] after
349
the HER tests showed little changes compared to the pristine electrode, the intensities of the
350
MoVI peaks in
[email protected] after the OER tests increased significantly, indicating the
351
oxidation of surface Mo under applied high oxidation potentials. Consistently, Fourier-
352
transformed infrared spectroscopy studies showed the appearance of two new peaks at ca. 1400
353
cm-1 and 600 cm-1 in
[email protected] after the OER tests (Figure S20). These two peaks
354
could be attributed to MoOx,46 which were likely generated by surface oxidation of Ni0.2Mo0.8N
355
nanoparticles at applied high voltages. In the meanwhile, the broaden peaks at ca. 3400 cm-1
356
could also consist of the vibrations of the –OH groups in NiOOH or Ni(OH)2, which came from
357
the surface oxidation of Ni0.2Mo0.8N or Ni(0).49 The above results suggested that both the used
358
HER and OER electrodes of
[email protected] were basically the same as the pristine ones,
359
although the surface species were partly oxidized into MoOx and NiOOH in strong alkali
360
environment. In contrast, Nifoam@Ni4Mo/MoO2 could not withstand the OER tests, despite the
361
fact that it exhibited excellent, stable HER activities in 1.0 M KOH. XRPD and EDS analyses
362
showed that MoO2 was dissolved in the alkali solution during the OER tests (Figure S1), likely
363
because of oxidation under the applied high OER potentials.31 Similarly, the precursor
364
Nifoam@NiMoO4 was also unstable for OER in alkali environment, confirmed by the change of
365
color and XRPD patterns before and after immersion in 1.0 M KOH for several hours (Figure
366
S10). The above results showed that the extraordinary HER and OER stabilities of Nifoam@Ni-
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
20
Page 21 of 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
367
Ni0.2Mo0.8N could be attributed to the formation of highly corrosion- and oxidation-resistant
368
metal nitrides.
369
The above results also shed light on the active sites in
[email protected]. The nanorods
370
in
[email protected] consist of interconnecting, evenly distributed Ni0.2Mo0.8N and Ni or
371
NiO nanoparticles. The surface Ni and Mo were oxidized upon exposure to air and/or in alkaline
372
media, which acted as highly-active HER and OER sites similar to many previous studies.6, 35-37,
373
50, 51
374
distributed active sites: Mo atoms acted as adsorbent toward H2O molecules and lowered the
375
energy for Volmer step, while Ni atoms served as efficient catalytic centers and lowered the
376
energy for Tafel step.5 Synergy between Mo and Ni in
[email protected] resulted in great
377
HER and OER performance. Consistently,
[email protected] showed better performance
378
than Nifoam@Ni3N.
Due to the N-doping, the oxidation process only occurred on the surface, producing evenly-
379
To further elucidate the high activities of
[email protected], we investigated the
380
relationship between electrochemical activities and electrochemically active surface areas
381
(ECSAs) of the materials described above. The ECSA of a material is proportional to its
382
electrochemical double-layer capacitance (Cdl) in a non-Faradaic region, where the charge
383
transfer owing to the electrode reactions can be ignored and the current (j) originates only from
384
the electrical double layer charging and discharging.52 The Cdl can thus be obtained from the
385
equation |j| = v × Cdl, where v is the scan rate in CV measurements.44 As shown in Figure S21,
386
the Cdl values of the materials described above were obtained in the order of Nifoam@Ni-
387
Ni0.2Mo0.8N > Nifoam@Ni4Mo/MoO2 > Nifoam@Ni3N > Nifoam > Nifoam@NiMoO4. Nifoam@Ni-
388
Ni0.2Mo0.8N possesses the largest Cdl, i.e. the largest ECSAs amongst the tested samples,
389
consistent with the HER and OER experimental results. By comparison of the Cdl values between
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
21
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 22 of 28
390
the test materials and correlation with their electrocatalytic activities, the following speculations
391
can be drawn: First, the higher Cdl values and higher electrochemical activities of the nitride
392
electrodes compared to corresponding non-nitride electrodes (i.e.
[email protected] vs.
393
Nifoam@Ni4Mo/MoO2; Nifoam@Ni3N vs. Nifoam) show that the formation of metal nitrides results
394
in increase in ECSAs (i.e. Cdl), and thus improved electrocatalytic activities. The increase in
395
ECSAs could be attributed to the modification of the metals’ d bands by N in metal nitrides,
396
which rendered them more favorable for water splitting.7,8 Second, the better electrochemical
397
performance of
[email protected] vs. Nifoam@Ni3N show that there is a synergetic effect
398
between Mo and Ni, as observed in many other electrocatalysts,15,16 resulting in more ECSAs
399
and thus higher activities in bimetallic catalysts. The intimate interconnections between the
400
electrochemically active Ni0.2Mo0.8N and Ni or NiO nanoparticles in the
[email protected] 401
nanorods allow fast electron and mass transportation and thus facilitate the bond breakage and
402
formation during water splitting, further improving the electrocatalytic activities. Lastly, it is
403
pointed out that Nifoam@NiMoO4 possessed the lowest Cdl values, which could be attributed the
404
dissolution/oxidation of the catalyst under applied electrode potentials (1.025 to 1.125 V vs.
405
RHE) during the measurements.
406 407
3. CONCLUSIONS
408
In summary, we fabricated a bifunctional nanostructured nickel molybdenum nitride
409
electrode by topotactic transformation of NiMoO4 nanorods that were in situ grown vertically on
410
the surface of Ni foam. The nitride nanorods in the electrode (denoted as Nifoam@Ni-
411
Ni0.2Mo0.8N) consisted of interconnecting Ni0.2Mo0.8N nano crystallites decorated by partially
412
oxidized Ni nanoparticles. The electrode exhibited exceptionally low overpotentials and Tafel
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
22
Page 23 of 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
413
slopes for both HER and OER in 1.0 M KOH, surpassing the commercial benchmark materials
414
Pt/C and RuO2 under the same condition, respectively. A simple water electrolyzer using
415
[email protected] as both the anode and cathode required a very low cell potential of 1.49
416
V to reach a current density of 10 mA cm−2 and maintained stability for 110 h without any
417
degradation. The excellent bifunctional electrocatalytic properties of
[email protected] 418
could be ascribed to the formation of highly conductive, corrosion- and oxidation-resistant metal
419
nitrides, the synergetic effect of multiple active components, and the integration of 1-D
420
nanostructures on the electrode. Because of its excellent HER and OER activities, exceptional
421
stability and simple preparation,
[email protected] can be exploited as promising
422
electrodes for practical water electrolyzers. The preparative strategy developed in this work
423
could be applied to devise new highly efficient electrocatalysts.
424 425
Supporting Information.
426 427
Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: Additional XRPD, EDS, SEM, XPS, STEM, XPS spectra, tables and video clips.
428
Corresponding Author
429
Hongbin Du*. Email:
[email protected] 430
JunJie Zhu*. Email:
[email protected] 431
Notes
432
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
433
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
434 435
We are grateful for financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21471075 and 21673115).
436
REFERENCES
437 438
(1) Jiao, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Jaroniec, M.; Qiao, S. Z. Design of Electrocatalysts for Oxygen- and Hydrogen-involving Energy Conversion Reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2060-2086.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
23
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 24 of 28
439 440
(2) Dresselhaus, M. S.; Thomas, I. L. Alternative Energy Technologies. Nature 2001, 414, 332-337.
441 442 443
(3) Li, X. M.; Hao, X. G.; Abudula, A.; Guan, G. Q. Nanostructured Catalysts for Electrochemical Water Splitting: Current State and Prospects. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 1197312000.
444 445
(4) Walter, M. G.; Warren, E. L.; McKone, J. R.; Boettcher, S. W.; Mi, Q.; Santori, E. A.; Lewis, N. S. Solar Water Splitting Cells. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6446-6473.
446 447 448
(5) Reier, T.; Oezaslan, M.; Strasser, P. Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution Reaction (OER) on Ru, Ir, and Pt Catalysts: A Comparative Study of Nanoparticles and Bulk Materials. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 1765-1772.
449 450
(6) Zhang, J.; Wang, T.; Liu, P.; Liao, Z.; Liu, S.; Zhuang, X. Efficient Hydrogen Production on MoNi4 Electrocatalysts with Fast Water Dissociation Kinetics. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15437.
451 452 453
(7) Suntivich, J.; May, K. J.; Gasteiger, H. A.; Goodenough, J. B.; Shao-Horn, Y. A Perovskite Oxide Optimized for Oxygen Evolution Catalysis from Molecular Orbital Principles. Science 2011, 334, 1383-1385.
454 455 456
(8) Singh, A.; Chang, S. L. Y.; Hocking, R. K.; Bach, U.; Spiccia, L. Highly Active Nickel Oxide Water Oxidation Catalysts Deposited from Molecular Complexes. Energy & Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 579-586.
457 458 459
(9) Zhang, B.; Zheng, X.; Voznyy, O.; Comin, R.; Bajdich, M.; García-Melchor, M.; Han, L.; Xu, J.; Liu, M.; Zheng, L. Homogeneously Dispersed Multimetal Oxygen-Evolving Catalysts. Sci. 2016, 352, 333-337.
460 461 462
(10) Trotochaud, L.; Young, S. L.; Ranney, J. K.; Boettcher, S. W. Nickel-iron Oxyhydroxide Oxygen-evolution Electrocatalysts: The Role of Intentional and Incidental Iron Incorporation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 6744-6753.
463 464 465
(11) Gao, M.; Sheng, W.; Zhuang, Z.; Fang, Q.; Gu, S.; Jiang, J. Efficient Water Oxidation Using Nanostructured α-nickel-hydroxide as an Electrocatalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 7077-7084.
466 467
(12) Song, F.; Hu, X. Ultrathin Cobalt–Manganese Layered Double Hydroxide Is an Efficient Oxygen Evolution Catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 16481-16484.
468 469 470
(13) Ping, J.; Wang, Y.; Lu, Q. Self-Assembly of Single-Layer CoAl-Layered Double Hydroxide Nanosheets on 3D Graphene Network Used as Highly Efficient Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28,7640-7645.
471 472 473 474
(14) Zhu, J.; Sakaushi, K.; Clavel, G.; Shalom, M.; Antonietti, M.; Fellinger, T.-P., A General Salt-Templating Method to Fabricate Vertically Aligned Graphitic Carbon Nanosheets and Their Metal Carbide Hybrids for Superior Lithium Ion Batteries and Water Splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 5480-5485.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
24
Page 25 of 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
475 476 477
(15) Chen, W. F.; Muckerman, J. T.; Fujita, E. Recent Developments in Transition Metal Carbides and Nitrides as Hydrogen Evolution Electrocatalysts. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 88968909.
478 479
(16) Dong, H.; Lee, J.; Transition Metal Carbides and Nitrides as Electrode Materials for Low Temperature Fuel Cells. Energies 2009, 2, 873-899.
480 481
(17) Wan, C.; Leonard, B. M. Iron-Doped Molybdenum Carbide Catalyst with High Activity and Stability for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 4281-4288.
482 483
(18) Yang, H.; Gong, Q.; Song, X. Mo2C Nanoparticles Dispersed on Hierarchical Carbon Microflowers for Efficient Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. ACS Nano, 2016, 10, 11337.
484 485 486
(19) Wang, Y.; Xie, C.; Liu, D.; Huang, X.; Huo, J.; Wang, S. Nanoparticle-Stacked Porous Nickel-Iron Nitride Nanosheet: A Highly Efficient Bifunctional Electrocatalyst for Overall Water Splitting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 18652-18657.
487 488 489
(20) Xu, K.; Chen, P.; Li, X.; Tong, Y.; Ding, H.; Wu, X.; Chu, W.; Peng, Z.; Wu, C.; Xie, Y. Metallic Nickel Nitride Nanosheets Realizing Enhanced Electrochemical Water Oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4119-4125.
490 491 492
(21) Chen, W.; Sasaki, K.; Ma, C.; Frenkel, A. I.; Marinkovic, N.; Muckerman, J. T.; Zhu, Y.; Adzic, R. R. Hydrogen-Evolution Catalysts Based on Non-Noble Metal Nickel-Molybdenum Nitride Nanosheets. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 91, 6131-6135.
493 494
(22) Shalom, M.; Molinari, V.; Esposito, D. Sponge-Like Nickel and Nickel Nitride Structures for Catalytic Applications. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 1272-1276.
495 496 497
(23) Zhai, M. K.; Wang, F.; Du, H. B. Transition-Metal Phosphide–Carbon Nanosheet Composites Derived from Two-Dimensional Metal-Organic Frameworks for Highly Efficient Electrocatalytic Water-Splitting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 40171-40179.
498 499
(24) Sun, M.; Liu, H.; Qu, J.; Li, J. Earth-Rich Transition Metal Phosphide for Energy Conversion and Storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1600087.
500 501 502
(25) Gong, Z.; Wang, G.; Yang, L.; Liu, H.; Qu, J.; Li, J. Highly Active and Stable Catalysts of Phytic Acid-derivative Transition Metal Phosphides for Full Water Splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 14686-14693.
503 504
(26) Li, S.; Zhang, G.; Tu, X.; Li, J. Polycrystalline CoP/CoP2 Structures for Efficient Full Water Splitting. Chemelectrochem. 2018, 5, 701-707.
505 506 507 508
(27) Lacroix, P. G.; Munoz, M. C.; Gaspar, A. B.; Real, J. A.; Bonhommeau, S.; Rodriguez, V. Synthesis, Crystal Structures, and Solid State Quadratic Nonlinear Optical Properties of a Series of Stilbazolium Cations Combined with Gold Cyanide Counter-ion. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 15940-15949.
509 510 511
(28) Masa, J.; Sinev, I.; Mistry, H. Ultrathin High Surface Area Nickel Boride (NixB) Nanosheets as Highly Efficient Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Evolution. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700381.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
25
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 26 of 28
512 513
(29) Zhu, H.; Jiang, R.; Chen, X. 3D Nickel-Cobalt Diselenide Nanonetwork for Highly Efficient Oxygen Evolution. Sci. Bull. 2017, 20, 1373-1379.
514 515 516
(30) Shi, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, D. R.; Xu, W. X.; Wang, C.; Wang, F. B.; Xia, X.-H.; Chen, H.Y. Energy Level Engineering of MoS2 by Transition-Metal Doping for Accelerating Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 15479-15485.
517 518 519 520
(31) Spöri, C.; Kwan, J. T. H.; Bonakdarpour, A.; Wilkinson, D. P.; Strasser, P. The Stability Challenges of Oxygen Evolving Electrocatalysts: Towards a Common Fundamental Understanding and Mitigation of Catalyst Degradation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 59946021.
521 522
(32) Faber, M. S.; Jin, S. Earth-abundant inorganic electrocatalysts and Their Nanostructures for Energy Conversion Applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 3519-3542.
523 524 525
(33) Wang, J. H.; Cui, W.; Liu, Q.; Xing, Z. C.; Asiri, A. M.; Sun, X. P. Recent Progress in Cobalt‐Based Heterogeneous Catalysts for Electrochemical Water Splitting. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 215-230.
526 527 528
(34) Cao, B. F.; Veith, G. M.; Neuefeind, J. C. ChemInform Abstract: Mixed Close-Packed Cobalt Molybdenum Nitrides as Non-Noble Metal Electrocatalysts for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Cheminform, 2014, 45, 19186.
529 530
(35) Shalom, M.; Ressnig, D.; Yang, X.; Clavel, G.; Fellinger, T. P. Nickel Nitride as an Efficient Electrocatalyst for Water Splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 8171-8177.
531 532 533
(36) Yin, Z.; Sun, Y.; Zhu, C.; Li, C.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Y. Bimetallic Ni–Mo Nitride Nanotubes as Highly Active and Stable Bifunctional Electrocatalysts for Full Water Splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 13648-13658.
534 535 536
(37) Wu, A.; Xie, Y.; Ma, H.; Tian, C.; Gu, Y.; Yan, H. Integrating the Active OER and HER Components as the Heterostructures for the Efficient Overall Water Splitting. Nano Energy, 2017, 44, 353-363.
537 538 539
(38) Wang, T.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, J.; Li, X. A Highly Efficient and Stable Biphasic Nanocrystalline Ni–Mo–N Catalyst for Hydrogen Evolution in Both Acidic and Alkaline Electrolytes. Nano Energy 2016, 22, 111-119.
540 541 542
(39) Peng, S.; Li, L.; Wu, H. B.; Madhavi, S.; Lou, X. W. Controlled Growth of NiMoO4 Nanosheet and Nanorod Arrays on Various Conductive Substrates as Advanced Electrodes for Asymmetric Supercapacitors. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1401172.
543 544 545
(40) Wang, Z.; Wei, G.; Du, K.; Zhao, X.; Liu, M.; Wang, S. Ni Foam-Supported CarbonSheathed NiMoO4 Nanowires as Integrated Electrode for High-Performance Hybrid Supercapacitors. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 5964-5971.
546 547 548
(41) Hong, J.; Lee, Y. W.; Hou, B.; Ko, W.; Lee, J.; Pak, S. Solubility-Dependent NiMoO4 Nanoarchitectures: Direct Correlation between Rationally Designed Structure and Electrochemical Pseudokinetics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 35227-35234.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
26
Page 27 of 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
549 550 551
(42) Hu, B.; Qin, X.; Asiri, A. M. Fabrication of Ni(OH)2, Nanoflakes Array on Ni Foam as a Binder-Free Electrode Material for High Performance Supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 107, 339-342.
552 553 554
(43) Zhang, B.; Xiao, C. H.; Xie, S. M.; Liang, J.; Chen, X.; Tang, Y. H. Iron–Nickel Nitride Nanostructures in Situ Grown on Surface-Redox-Etching Nickel Foam: Efficient and Ultrasustainable Electrocatalysts for Overall Water Splitting. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 6934-6941.
555 556 557
(44) Yang, Y. Q.; Zhang, K.; Lin, H. L.; Li, X.; Chan, H. C.; Yang, L. C.; Gao, Q. S. MoS2– Ni3S2 Heteronanorods as Efficient and Stable Bifunctional Electrocatalysts for Overall Water Splitting. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 2357-2366.
558 559 560
(45) McCrory, C. C. L.; Jung, S.; Ferrer, I. M.; Chatman, S. M.; Peters, J. C.; Jaramillo, T. F. Benchmarking Hydrogen Evolving Reaction and Oxygen Evolving Reaction Electrocatalysts for Solar Water Splitting Devices. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4347-4357.
561 562
(46) Duan, J. J.; Chen, S.; Zhao, C. Ultrathin Metal-Organic Framework Array for Efficient Electrocatalytic Water Splitting. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15341.
563 564 565
(47) Teng, W.; Guo, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Chang, X.; Jie, Z.; Li, X. Ni-Mo Nanocatalysts on NDoped Graphite Nanotubes for Highly Efficient Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution in Acid. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 10397-10403.
566 567 568
(48) Hong, J.; Lee, Y. W.; Hou, B.; Ko, W.; Lee, J.; Pak, S. On the Configuration, Molecular Structure and Vibrational Properties of MoOx Sites on Alumina, Zirconia, Titania and Silica. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2013, 3, 1869-1888.
569 570 571 572
(49) Ratcliff, E. L.; Meyer, J.; Steirer, K. X.; Garcia, A.; Berry, J. J.; Ginley, D. S. Evidence for Near-surface NiOOH Species in Solution-Processed NiOx Selective Interlayer Materials: Impact on Energetics and the Performance of Polymer Bulk Heterojunction Photovoltaics. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 4988-5000.
573 574 575
(50) Zhang, Y.; Ouyang, B.; Xu, J.; Chen, S.; Rawat, R. S.; Fan, H. J. 3D Porous Hierarchical Nickel-Molybdenum Nitrides Synthesized by RF Plasma as Highly Active and Stable HydrogenEvolution-Reaction Electrocatalysts. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016. 6, 1600221.
576 577
(51) Wang, F.; Sun, Y.; He, Y.; Liu, L.; Xu, J.; Zhao, X. Highly Efficient and Durable Moninc Catalyst for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Nano Energy, 2017, 37, 1-6.
578 579
(52) You, B.; Sun, Y. Hierarchically Porous Nickel Sulfide Multifunctional Superstructures Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1502333.
580
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
27
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
581 582
Page 28 of 28
Table of Contents (TOC) Graphic: :
583 584 585
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
28