EDUCATION FACULTY
SCORECARD
NO CHANGE IN NUMBERS OF WOMEN FACULTY C&EN's annual survey shows that women remain underrepresented in top chemistry departments CORINNE A. MARASCO, C&EN WASHINGTON
T
HERE HAS BEEN LITTLE CHANGE
in the percentage ofwomen faculty members in the top 50 chemistry departments in the five years that C&EN has examined this topic, and what little progress there is continues to be unevenly distributed. Women are still underrepresented among the full professor ranks, despite slow and steady headway overall. C&EN surveyed schools identified by the National Science Foundation as having spent the most on chemical research in 2002, the latest year for which data are available. The schools were contacted by email and telephone and were asked to provide the number ofmale and female tenured and tenure-track faculty holding full, associate, and assistant professorships with at least 50% of their salaries paid by the chemistry department for the 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 academic year. These numbers exclude emeritus professors, instructors, and lecturers. The response rate was 100%. In academic year 2 0 0 4 05, women represent 12% of the total chemistry faculty at the top 50 institutions. This is the same percentage as in 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 (C&EN, Oct. 27, 2 0 0 3 , page 58) and 2 0 0 2 - 0 3 (C&EN, Sept. 23,2002, page 110) but up from 11% in 2 0 0 1 - 0 2 (C&EN, Oct. 1, 2001, page 98). In absolute terms, the total number of faculty positions increased from 1,592 last year to 1,594.5, and the total number ofpositions filled by women increased from 196.5 to 197.
2 0 0 2 but not in 2003. Schools that were on the list in 2 0 0 3 but dropped off in 2 0 0 4 are Columbia University, the University of Chicago, the University of Georgia, and the University of Southern California. Together, those schools had nine female chemistry faculty members, whereas the four schools that replaced them have 12. Among the schools with the highest proportion ofwomen in the total faculty, Rutgers University maintains its first-place spot: 10 women, or 25% of the faculty The University of California, Los Angeles, is next with nine women, or 23% of the faculty Purdue University follows with 10 women who make up 21% of the faculty This year, there is a three-way tie for fourth place between Florida State University, SUNY Stony Brook, and the University of Colorado, where women make up 19% of the faculty Tied for fifth place are Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the University of Arizona, which both have six women who make up 18% of the faculty At the other end, three schools on the list this year—Emory University, the University of Georgia, and the University of Virginia—have just one woman on their faculty. Eleven schools have two women, and 10 have three. Women continue to be concentrated in the assistant and associate professor ranks. Women make up 2 0 % of assistant professors, which is down one percentage point from last year but still higher than the 18% share in 2000, the first year of the survey Women's representation among associate professors has hovered around 2 0 % since the beginning of the survey; this year, it's at 19%. By comparison, women currently account for 8% of full professors, the same as last year. The 2 0 0 0 baseline was a 6% share of full professorships. These numbers are consistent with a
Women continue to be concentrated in the assistant and associate professor ranks.
A COMPARISON of this year's list to last year's shows some differences in the schools included. Schools added to the list in 2 0 0 4 are the State University of New York, Buffalo; SUNY Stony Brook; the University of Virginia; and Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University Both Virginia schools were on the list in 32
C&EN / SEPTEMBER 27, 2004
2004 report from NSF, "Gender Differences in the Careers of Academic Scientists & Engineers." The report uses data from the NSF biennial Survey of Doctorate Recipients to examine gender differences for four outcomes that reflect successful progress in an academic career: tenure-track placements, achieving tenure, promotion to associate professor, and promotion to full professor. NSF finds evidence to suggest that among academic scientists and engineers, women are less successful in their academic career paths than men. Some of the disparity may be related to family characteristics: Married women and women with children tend to be less successful by those measures than men who are married and have children. NSF determined that the estimates of success rates were insensitive to either primary work activity or the characteristics of academic employers. IN ANALYZING tenure-track positions, NSF found that women with eight or nine years of postdoctoral experience who are employed full time in academia are less likely than men to be tenured. NSF's analysis suggests that women's chances for earning tenure are influenced by family characteristics: Opting to have children later—rather than earlier—in their careers is positively related to women's chances for earning tenure. Women with 14 or 15 years of experience since earning their Ph.D.s who work full time in academia are more likely than men to be found in the junior ranks and less likely to be full professors. Furthermore, women are less likely than men to be promoted to senior ranks. Although the NSF research focuses on a limited number of outcomes, there are other questions worthy ofexploration when considering this topic. For example, do women face greater mobility constraints than men when selecting jobs, especially when they must find new employment after failing to receive tenure? What gender differences exist between full-time and parttime employment? The assumption that women science and engineering faculty lag behind their male counterparts in achieving academic career milestones is reinforced byfiveyears' worth of data collected by C&EN, combined with the NSF analysis. That women's share of full professors and total faculty increased just two percentage points in both cases overfiveyears suggests that there are gender-related factors impeding their progress, compared with that of their male counterparts. HTTP://WWW.CEN-ONLINE.ORG
WOMEN IN ACADEMIA Only 8% of full chemistry professors at top 50 universities are women FULL PROFESSOR TOTAL WOMEN
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR '•^ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊU^
%
»ulf
5 18 6 9 6
2 0 2 0 0
40 0 33 0 0
mmm- mmm mm· : mmm. mamm. mm, ; '.. mmmïÊHmmm> mm:m:Ι ϊ β β Ι sel» mmm lifiiiïi WÊÊ^m
mmm, m,iiatit mmm. I M i l l l warn. m$m msmm ÉÉÉil -mm::.rnm^m « l i i i
k 1 1 6 3
1 2 2 0 2
25 29 29 0 67
-mmmii i « i i i i « t t
6 8 3 6 7
1 0 2 3 1
17 0 67 50 14
mmm mmÊËÊÈ»mmmy. mmm mmmst mm$ mmm. mMÊum i l l i i i . mm-mrnimm «lit-; mmm:.;:1III1Iwmm: : wt$m i i t l i l l ïiiii ; wmm. :mmm mmm mmmWiHÈKË mmm
5 6 11 k 9
0 2 3 0 1
0 33 27 0 11
7 7 3 8 5
1 3 1 2 1
14 43 33 25 20
6 3 3 6 3.5
1 0 0 0 0
17 0 0 0 0
8 k 2 1 k
k 1 0 1 1
50 25 0 14 25
mmm i S i l i mmm-cSEES! : - l c & % mmmmm.: liii .:)rm^ l ull wëmm Ills! \:m:m.::: :mmém wm'm msmMΙ ί ΐ ϊ ί mmmmmmm flUSil mmmmi i t l l l l S u ï 11111111
k 3 11 3 6
2 1 2 1 2
50 33 18 33 33
0 3 6 6 9
0 0 1 2 2
nm 0 17 33 22
wmm mmmm: IIÏÉlt
299.5
2 5 2 k 1
California, U of, Los Angeles 8 California, U of, San Diego3 California tnst. of Technology Colorado, U of6 Cornell U*
25 18 21 21 23
k 5 2 k 2
16 -mm. mmi ιι»ιΐ 28 1 1 1 1 1 1 mmmm: :msm 10 m^m. m-,m:mx. 19 •mmmmmmm-: lmm lill 9 mmw& iliil mmmm::::
Emory Uc Florida, U of Ftorida State Ua Georgia Inst, of Technology 3 Harvard UB
17 21 15 20 18
0 1 2 1 1
0 5 13 5 6
Illinois, U of, Urbana-Champaign Indiana U Johns Hopkins U Louisiana State U system Maryland, U of, College Park 8
32 18 13 17 25
3 0 0 0 5
9 0 0 0 20
mmmm.. mmmms ι » ΐ : m.mm mmm.; ;lili1
Massachusetts, U of, Amherst Massachusetts Inst, of Technology Michigan, U of Michigan State U Minnesota, U of
10 24 24 20 25
0 3 1 2 2
0 13 k 10 8
North Carolina, U of, Chapel Hill North Carolina State U Northwestern U Notre Dame, U of3 Ohio State U
23 15 22 11 21
2 0 1 0 2
9 :ΜΦΜ WgWë:n i i s i s 0 mrnxm mmmÊ- %i l l » 5 :mmm mmtmm 'Hill 0 mmmm:« i s i i i i l Ë Ë 10 mmm i i i i i i i
Oklahoma, U of8 Pennsylvania, U of Pennsylvania State U Pittsburgh, U of Princeton U
14 20 20 12 20
0 2 2 0 0
0 10 10 0 0
Purdue U RiceU Rutgers Ub South Carolina, U of3 Stanford U
32 17 30 18 16
3 1 6 1 1
9 ,.mm:& 111111^liiiif 6 mmm::. mmmi Ι ϋ β Ι 20 ':mm.:mmmmsmi mmm 6 m.mlm:':mimâm.mmm, 6 ^ • Y 3 £ ; > · mmmmm:i*iil
State U of New York, Buffalo State U of New York, Stony Brook Texas, U of, Austin 8 Texas A&M U Utah,U of
22 18 30 37 21
1 3 1 3 2
5 17 3 8 10
Virginia, U of Virginia Polytechnic Inst. & State U Washington, U of Wayne State U Wisconsin, U of, Madison
19 16 31 14 30
0 1 2 1 2
0 6 6 7 7
1,048
89
wmm
8 23 ;:'ll#li ilmiÊr-: mSËÈ& 9 mmmmi i i f c i i S i i i î 10 11 :;;: v i l l im§mm, mmm.: 10k 5 •-MMB mmm. l l i t i
il^ll
m$M mmm.mm 11111
màm M i t r i 'imp :mmâmmm^ iftiii mwx>m*m$ wxm Sit*
:mmm: mmmm:,:: •r^rm:mm-Ά l l i l mmx-m mmmmm.I I l l m&m- wmm:IIËï
mil
r.--mM:mmmm
wmm mmBAi i i S iiil ^ mmmmmm::!. .mmmm::il;3111I Ï I 1 11* 2 Smmmmm: mm. •:;J$M
•^um%
mm?
mmm
11111
i i i i i i i 'itsmmm WSÊËÈ
NOTE: Appointments as of 2004-05 academic: year, a Chemistry and b i o c h e m i | § S Ê ! l ! t ^ ^ but UC San Francisco, which ranks first, has no chemistry department, nm *WÈtÈÊÊÊIÊÈÊÊi§X
HTTP://WWW.CEN-ONLINE.ORG
WÊHii :mÊÊÈË imâm
0% 13 30 10 25
12 22 22 35 21
8%
ALL FACULTY mm^mmÊÉÈ&mM
0 1 3 1 1
Akron, U of Arizona, U of Arizona State Ua California, U of, Berkeley California, U of, Irvine
TOTAL
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR WOMEN %
TOTAL Î;$ÊÈÊÊ WÊKÊÊ& k 17% . • • : - i i l-«i
59
20%
mmm. mÉsmmm*. mmm mmm wmm maim mmm mmm: mmm. mmmmïimm::, mmm i i i i ï i i mmmm
i i w i i mÉm ÈÈÈtëiï
mmm mmmmm mmmm:mmm mmmm l É i i i l i ;imm:: mmm,mmmm: mmmmwmmm mm'i mmm wmm mmm^ml i i e i l l warn. mmmm. ::.::mmSMvmm: mmmm. s i l l l l l mm-. mmm-m• : l l i l l l l ï i l i l um&Êk ,S11III1wmm
1I1ÏII "WÊËÈm "tmmmi
nmm*i a ' l i l i l mm.
mmmsmm:::mm& 'mm:,m mmmm: -mmm» wmB mmmymmmmmmm mm&. •"-mmm.lÊÊmm, mmmmimmm mmm mmm/: mmmmWÈÊmm: mmmmi•mmmmllii:,:' mmm,. :mmim iMimm: mmm::.:m.mm mmx ÎMiiiiil u l l :m::::M::% mmm:m--mmm Heii;
B»«l mm/rn mmmm.
1111:1 m:mm. mmmm. m:mm: ..mmmmm*.
mmmm:mmmmi^mmwm mmmm. mmmm iimêm :
^ mm mmitÈi:îSiifc
mmm m:§mm. litiK mm? mmm§m:iiSiit r wm&f:mÊÈÎÈ:ΙΙϋϋΙ
biology, c Emory University fa|*|sil§ oilwiÉ^I^
C&EN / SEPTEMBER 27, 2004
33
