Novel Aza-analogous Ergoline Derived Scaffolds as Potent Serotonin

May 30, 2014 - *Phone: +45 36 43 32 32. E-mail: ... By introducing distal substituents on a tetracyclic scaffold resembling the ergoline structure, tw...
0 downloads 0 Views 252KB Size
Subscriber access provided by OAKLAND UNIV

Brief Article

Novel Aza-analogous Ergoline Derived Scaffolds as Potent Serotonin 5-HT6 and Dopamine D2 Receptor Ligands. Niels Krogsgaard-Larsen, Anders A. Jensen, Tenna J Schrøder, Claus T Christoffersen, and Jan Kehler J. Med. Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/jm5003759 • Publication Date (Web): 30 May 2014 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on June 7, 2014

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Novel Aza-analogous Ergoline Derived Scaffolds as Potent Serotonin 5-HT6 and Dopamine D2 Receptor Ligands. Krogsgaard-Larsen, Nielsa†; Jensen, Anders A.a†; Schrøder, Tenna. J.b; Christoffersen, Claus. T.b; and Kehler, Janb* a

Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, The Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2 Universitetsparken, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. bH. Lundbeck A/S, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, 9 Ottiliavej, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark

ABSTRACT: By introducing distal substituents on a tetracyclic scaffold resembling the ergoline structure two series of analogues were achieved exhibiting subnanomolar receptor binding affinities for the dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-HT6 receptor subtype respectively. While the 5-HT6 ligands were antagonists, the D2 ligands displayed intrinsic activities ranging from full agonism to partial agonism with low intrinsic activity. These structures could potentially be interesting for treatment of neurological diseases such as schizophrenia, Parkinson’s disease and cognitive deficits.

Several of the monoaminergic receptors mediating the effects of dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine constitute key targets in the current treatment of a wide range of neurological, psychiatric and cognitive disorders. In Parkinson’s disease (PD) a degeneration of dopamine neurons in the basal ganglia, predominantly the substantia nigra pars compacta nuclei, is evident.1 To reduce the symptoms arising from this progressive neurodegeneration, PD is principally treated with L-DOPA or synthetic dopaminergic agonists. However, the severe drawbacks and temporary effectiveness of this treatment urge the development of therapeutic alternatives.2 Schizophrenia (SZ) is a chronic disorder characterized by an array of clinical features resulting in abnormal mental functions and disturbed behaviour.3 The major treatment paradigm in SZ is the use of dopamine D2 receptor antagonists or partial agonists with low intrinsic activity and all current clinical antipsychotics target this receptor.4,5 Finally, the cognitive impairment observed in CNS disorders such as Alzheimers disease (AD) and SZ have in several studies been shown to be addressed by serotonin 5-HT6 receptor antagonists.6-8 R 8

7

NH2

6

N 5

9

4

10 11

12

D

H H

14

H

1N H

D

C

Ergoline scaf f old

A

N

Clavine type Agroclavine (1)

A

N

H

C B N H

O

HO O

O

3 2

13

N

O B N H

Lysergic Acid Amides Ergine (2)

N H

N

D

O

N

H

C A

B N H

Peptide Ergot Alkaloids Ergocornine (3)

Figure 1: The basic ergoline scaffold and examples of the three types of naturally occurring ergot alkaloids (1-3). Ergot alkaloids are derivatives of the tetracyclic ergoline scaffold and can be divided in to three main groups (Figure 1). The

ergot alkaloids display a diverse spectrum of pharmacological properties, including central, peripheral and neurohormonal activities that arise from their activities at various monaminergic receptors.9 Ergot alkaloids are used in the clinical treatment of PD and have also been pursued as putative therapeutics for treatment of SZ.10-13 Thus, the basic ergoline structure presents an intriguing scaffold for further modification and development of novel monoaminergic receptor ligands. In the present study, the potential of a novel ergot analogue scaffold was probed through the design and synthesis of two series of tetracyclic piperazine analogues (15-27 and 29-41). These compounds were pharmacologically characterized at either the dopamine D2 or the serotonin 5-HT2C and 5-HT6 receptors. The objective of this preliminary study was to obtain an ergoline analogous scaffold by combining two privileged scaffolds (indole and phenyl piperazine) that upon introduction of distal substitutions on the resulting tetracyclic core scaffold could embrace the different monoaminergic pharmacophore models and target various monoaminergic receptor subtypes. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Chemistry. Carbamate-protected piperazino indoles 7 and 8 are readily available from protection of commercially available 4-piperazinoindole, however, the disbursement of the compound prompted an alternative synthetic route. The chemistry leading from 4-bromoindole 1 to compound 12 and 25 followed a previously developed protocol (Scheme 1).14 Tetracycle 15 was readily alkylated or benzylated selectively at the secondary amine. The syntheses of the derivatives 16-27 were only performed in small scale and purified by preparative LC-MS with the n-propyl analogue being the exception for full characterization purposes. Boc-protected tetracycle 28 was sequentially sulphonated at the indole nitrogen and deprotected to complete a small, selected series of phenylsulphone-substituted analogues.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Scheme 1.a O

O Br

N

Br

a 96 %

N H

N

b

N O O S

79 %

N O O S

4 5

6

O

O

R

N

O

N

O

e N O O S

O

O

R

N

80 % c R

N

N

d

O

11: 92 % 12: 86 %

N

9: 49 % 10: 36 %

N H

9: R = Bn 10: R = t Bu

11: R = Bn 12: R = t Bu

O

N H

7: R = Bn 8: R = t Bu

13: 55 %

f 14: 51 % O

O

R H N

N

g

N

R N

h

N

60 % N O S O

Preperative library

N H

N H

15

16: R = Me 17: R = Et 18: R = n Pr 19: R = n Bu 20: R = i Bu 21: R = n Pn 22: R = i Pn - 23: R = CH2 c Hex 24: R = Bn 25: R = 2 CH2 biPh 26: R = 3 CH2 biPh 27: R = 4 CH2 biPh

13: R = Bn 14: R = t Bu

c

76 % O

H N

O N

N

i -

N

64 87 % N H

N

N O S

O

R

28 29: R = H 30: R = 2 Me 31: R = 3 Me 32: R = 4 Me 33: R = 2 F 34: R = 3 F 35: R = 4 F

36: R = 2 Cl 37: R = 3 Cl 38: R = 4 Cl 39: R = 2 OMe 40: R = 3 OMe 41: R = 4 OMe

a

Reagents and conditions: (a) p-TsCl, n-Bu4NHSO4, NaOH (16 %), PhMe, 60 °C, 2 h; (b) Cbz-piperazine, Pd(dba)2, 1-biphenyl-P(t-Bu)2, NaO-t-Bu, PhMe, reflux, 15 h; (c) Mg (dust), MeOH (dry), THF (dry), sonication, rt, 30 min; (d) 1) POCl3, DMF, 0 °C, 1.5 h - rt, 2 h; 2) H2O, rt, 45 min; (e) p-TsCl, n-Bu4NHSO4, NaOH (16 %), PhMe, rt, 45 min; (f) 1) p-TsNHNH2, PhMe, sonication, rt, 3 h, 2) NaH (60 % in mineral oil), PhMe, microwave irradiation, 130 °C, 12 min; (g) KOH (20 % in H2O), DMSO, microwave irradiation, 150 °C, 4 min. (h) DIPEA, DMSO, alkyl bromide, 60 °C, 42 h (16 - 23); DIPEA, DMSO, benzyl bromide, rt, 18 h (24 - 27); (i) 1) pTsCl, n-Bu4NHSO4, NaOH 16 %), PhMe, rt, 2 h; 2) MeOH, Et2O, 2 M HCl in Et2O, rt, 18 h.

substituent.15 Thus, it was decided to include small straight or branched alkyl substituents up to the length of the pentyl chain in the analogues. Moreover, the dopamine D2 affinity of bifeprunox (43) indicates a very efficient interaction between the receptor and the aromatic biphenyl group of the ligand.16 Due to the size of the N-substituent it will have to protrude into a different and much more spacious cavity of the binding site as it is seen in the case of bromocriptine (44).17 In view of this, analogues with benzyl or different methylene biphenyl substituents in this position were also included in this series. In the evaluation of the pharmacological properties of the synthesized analogues described vide infra, it is important to keep in mind that the compounds were tested as racemic mixtures and that the conclusions concerning the spacious cavity is based on the crystal structure of 5-HT1B co-crystallised with ergotamine as a model for the D2 receptor binding site, which is in correlation with existing literature.17-19 As can be seen from Table 1, a pronounced correlation ranging over more than a 1000 fold difference in binding affinities exists between the size of the substituent and the binding affinities of the compounds at the human D2L receptor. Interestingly, the n-Pr analogue 18 displays relatively low binding affinity, which could indicate that the alkyl substituent in this position is not able to accommodate the restriction of the alkyl binding cavity and therefore will have protrude the larger cavity of the binding site.15 The spacious orientation of the biphenyl moiety also seems to be of great importance despite protruding into a different and much larger cavity of the D2 receptor pocket, resulting in a 700-fold difference in D2 binding affinity.17 Compound 26 stands out as the most potent D2 receptor ligand to come from the series displaying an interesting D2 receptor profile compared to the structurally related compounds pergolide (42), bifeprunox (43), bromocriptine (44), and lisuride (45).16,20-22 The binding affinity of compound 26 was comparable to that of lisuride (45), the classical anti-parkinson ergot, while the compound exhibited a significantly higher D2 affinity than pergolide (42) and bromocriptine (44) also used in the treatment of PD.18 However, being a partial D2 agonist with an intrinsic activity comparable to that of bifeprunox (43), compound 26 resembles a potential antipsychotic more than an anti-Parkinson therapeutic by shifting the D2 profile towards those of typical antipsychotics such as chlorpromazine (46) and haloperidol (47), which display antagonism and inverse agonism at the D2 receptor, respectively (Figure 2).23 Interestingly, an inverse correlation between the dopamine D2 efficacy and the size of the amine substituent can be observed for the compounds in this series characterized functionally. Thus, compounds 22 and 23 which comprise smaller alkyl substituents are full agonists of the D2 receptor and could be speculated to hold more potential as putative PD therapeutics than compound 26. Cl

N

HO O N

N

Pharmacology. Naturally occurring ergot structures are almost exclusively methylated at the amine in the 6-position. However, different small alkyl substituents are accommodated by dopamine agonists such as 3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-propylpiperidine (3-PPP) and pergolide (42), which is most likely due to a welldefined pocket in the monoamine receptor fitting the n-propyl

Page 2 of 6

HO

OH

Cl HO

S

Chlorpromazine (46)

F

NH2

O

Haloperidol (47)

L DOPA (48)

Figure 2: The chemical structures of chlorpromazine (46), haloperidol (47) and L-DOPA (48).

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

A pronounced consequence of neurodegenerative diseases such as AD and SZ is cognitive dysfunction.6,7 Due to its CNS distribution and its ability to modulate multiple neurotransmitter systems involved in cognition, the serotonin 5-HT6 receptor has emerged as an interesting target through which this core feature of AD and SZ can be addressed.6-8 The serotonin 5-HT2C Table 1. Dopamine hD2L receptor binding affinities and functional efficacies of compounds 15 – 27 in comparison to benchmark compounds such as pergolide (42), bifeprunox (43), bromocriptine (44), and lisuride (45). R

S

N

N

N

H

N

N

H

O N H

15 27

N H

Bif eprunox (43)

Pergolide (42) O

HO

H N

O

O N

O

N H

N H

N

N

H

N

N

O

O

Br

N H

N H

Bromocriptine (44)

No.

H

Name (42-45) R (15-27)

Lisuride (45) hD2L

Ki (nM)

pKi ± S.E.M.

Emax

b

52

42

Pergolide

26

7.59 ± 0.06

43

Bifeprunox

2.3

8.64 ± 0.02b

27

b

28

44

Bromocriptine

15

7.83 ± 0.08

45

Lisuride

0.66

9.18 ± 0.04b

21

2100

5.68 ± 0.05

a

n.t.

a

n.t.

15

H

16

Me

660

6.18 ± 0.02

17

Et

140

6.85 ± 0.05a

n.t.

a

n.t.

18

n-Pr

570

6.24 ± 0.01

19

n-Bu

110

6.96 ± 0.02a

n.t.

a

n.t.

20

i-Bu

310

6.51 ± 0.05

21

n-Pn

98

7.01 ± 0.13a

n.t.

a

96 95

22

i-Pn

24

7.62 ± 0.04

23

CH2-c-hex

54

7.27 ± 0.13a a

51 n.t.

24

Bn

130

6.89 ± 0.06

25

2-CH2-biPh

450

6.70 ± 0.11b

26

3-CH2-biPh

0.65

9.64 ± 0.06a

35

27

4-CH2-biPh

140

6.92 ± 0.05a

n.t.

Dopamine D2 affinity: Displacement of specific [3H]-raclopride binding to membranes of CHO-K1a-hD2L cells (15-27), Displacement of specific [125I]iodosulpride at recombinant, human dopamine receptors in CHO cells (42, 44, 45).20 Displacement of specific [3H]nemonapride at dopamine D2 transfected COS-7 cells (43).16 Dopamine D2 efficacy: [125I]-cAMP in CHO cells (22-24,26). [35S]GTPγS binding to hD2-like receptors expressed by CHO cells (42, 44, 45).21 [35S]-GTPγS binding to membranes of Sf9 cells (43).22 n.t. = not tested, a(n = 2), b(n = 3).

receptor subtype has also been identified as a potential pharmacological target in relations to cognitive deficits and SZ.4,24,25 While both receptor subtypes have been included in this preliminary study focus will vide infra be upon the pharmacological interactions of the tetracyclic derivatives and the 5-HT6 receptor. In order to introduce 5-HT6 receptor activity in the tetracyclic ergot analogous scaffold, a phenylsulphonylate substituent was introduced at the indole nitrogen of compound 15, as this would address the receptor interacting elements defined in the classical 5-HT6 pharmacophore model.6,26 A small selection of substituents with a limited size and different electronical properties were introduced into this series of compounds in order to probe their potential as 5-HT6 ligands.6,27 As can be seen from the 5-HT6 receptor binding affinities exhibited by the sulphonamide analogues outlined in Table 2, substituents in the 4-position of the scaffold appear to be unfavorable compared to substituents in the 2- and 3-positions, whereas the receptor does not seem to discriminate between the latter two positions. It is not possible to derive any SAR conclusions about the size and electronic properties of the substituents chosen except that introduction of fluorine in these positions seem to be favored by the receptor. Compound 34 displayed the highest binding affinity (0.75 nM) at the 5-HT6 receptor and a 250-fold selectivity for this receptor over the 5-HT2C receptor. Moreover, the compound was found to be an antagonist at the 5-HT6 receptor (CEREP).28 While the subnanomolar 5-HT6 binding affinity displayed by compound 34 was lower than that exhibited by the structurally similar 5-HT6 antagonist SB-742457 (49), it was either higher or comparable to those exhibited by other sulphonyl-containing compounds such as Ro 63-0563 (50) and SB-271046 (51) and also by LU AE58054 (52).29,30 Interestingly, despite distinct structural differences these three compounds display similar 5HT6/5-HT2C binding selectivity ratios as compound 34. Mesulergine (53), which also contains the ergot scaffold, but with the sulphonamide attached to the piperidine moiety, displays the opposite 5-HT6/5-HT2C selectivity. Preliminary clearance and metabolic studies for compound 26 (3.9 L/kg/h(human)) indicated that it would be both metabolized and excreted at a rate unsuitable for a drug. In contrast, compound 34 (0.8 L/kg/h (human)) displayed a more favorable profile in a potential therapeutic context (1.3 L/kg/h (human)). The fast metabolism of compound 26 was not unexpected, since biphenyl moieties are known to be promptly metabolized by 4-hydroxylation.31 Thus, it is possible that the metabolic and clearance profile of these biphenylic analogues could be improved by introducing a substituent in the 4 position, thereby preventing this elaborate 4-hydroxylation. Interestingly, introduction of small substituents in the 4-position of biphenyl substituted 4-piperazineindole analogues have been found to increase the D2 receptor binding affinity (data not shown), which suggests that the problematic clearance and metabolism properties of this scaffold could be addressed without compromising the pharmacological properties of the compounds. In the present study the pharmacological properties of the two series of compounds were characterized on selected monoaminergic receptor subtypes that are well established as potential therapeutic targets in relations to PD, SZ and cognitive dysfunction.1-8 Considering the rich pharmacology of ergot

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

structures, it will be important to characterize the pharmacological properties of these compounds at additional monoaminerTable 2. Serotonin 5-HT6 and 5-HT2C receptor binding affinities of compounds 29-41 in comparison to the benchmark compounds 49-53. H N

H N NH

N

HN

N N N O

N O S

S

2

O

HN

O

S NH2

R 4

SB 742457 (49)

H N Cl

Ro 63 0563 (50)

F F

F

O

O

F

NH

N

N

S

O

N

O

H

S

S

NH

O

N

F

SB 271046 (51)

No.

H N

H

O N H

Mesulergine (53)

LU AE58054 (52)

Name (49-53)

h5-HT2C

h5-HT6

R (29-41)

Ki (nM)

pKi ± S.E.M.

Ki (nM)

pKi ± S.E.M.

49

SB-742457

-

-

0.17

9.78 ± 0.14d

50

Ro 63-0563

2042

5.69 ± 0.01e

12

7.91 ± 0.02b

3

8.52 ± 0.09a

51

SB-271046

770

6.11 ± 0.15

a c

c

52

LU AE58054

250

6.60 ± 0.04

0.83

9.08 ± 0.06

53

Mesulergine

1.82

8.74 ± 0.03b

776

6.11 ± 0.12e

29

H

280

6.55 ± 0.01

9

8.05 ± 0.04a

30

2-Me

470

6.33 ± 0.06

21

7.68 ± 0.05c

31

3-Me

460

6.34 ± 0.04

24

7.62 ± 0.04a

32

4-Me

780

6.11 ± 0.03

96

7.02 ± 0.12c

33

2-F

350

6.46 ± 0.02

n.t.

n.t.

34

3-F

240

6.62 ± 0.07

0.75

9.12 ± 0.04a

35

4-F

1100

5.96 ± 0.01

29

7.54 ± 0.10c

36

2-Cl

460

6.34 ± 0.06

n.t.

n.t.

37

3-Cl

340

6.47 ± 0.07

47

7.33 ± 0.10c

38

4-Cl

1200

5.92 ± 0.03

184

6.74 ± 0.14c

39

2-OMe

870

6.06 ± 0.04

26

7.59 ± 0.07c

40

3-OMe

370

6.43 ± 0.03

24

7.62 ± 0.34c

41

4-OMe

2900

gic receptors such as 5-HT2A (hallucinogenic properties) and 5HT2B (inadvertent heart effects), just to mention a few, in the future.37 Embracing the complexity of neurological disorders accentuate the need of therapeutics to display a distinct pharmacological profile rather than being receptor subtype selective. In relation to the pronounced conservation of the orthosteric binding sites in the monoaminergic receptors it would also be interesting to merge the D2 and 5-HT6 phamacophores and implement the tetracyclic structure in a hybrid scaffold, since the combination of either D2 receptor agonism or antagonism with 5-HT6 antagonism could hold great therapeutic potential.

O

O 3

29 41

Page 4 of 6

5.54 ± 0.07

168

c

6.77 ± 0.14

Serotonin 5-HT2C affinity: Displacement of specific [3H]mesulergine binding to human 5-HT2C receptors in membranes of tsA-201 cells (29-41), displacement of specific [3H]5HT at human recombinant 3T3 cells (50),32 displacement of specific [3H]5-HT binding to membranes of AV12 cells (51, 52),33 displacement of specific [3H]5-HT at human recombinant HEK-293 cells (53),34 Serotonin 5-HT6 affinity: Displacement of specific [3H]LSD binding to membranes of BHK-h5HT6 cells (29-41, 51, 52),33 Displacement of specific [3H]LSD binding to membranes of Hela cells (49, 50, 53).32,35,36 n.t. = not tested, a(n = 2), b(n = 3), c(n = 4), d(n = 10), e(n = multiple).

CONCLUSION The present study has identified a novel, pharmacologically interesting and both metabolically and chemically stable scaffold that by distal substitutions potentially can address either the dopaminergic deficits in PD patients or the cognitive impairments of disorders such as SZ and AD. However, despite the intriguing pharmacological properties of the analogues in these series compared to existing tool compounds and compounds in clinical trials or on the market, further pharmacological profiling of these compounds is required in order to evaluate their therapeutic potential. In particular, it will be important to characterize the functional properties of the compounds at other monoaminergic receptors than the D2, 5-HT6 and 5-HT2c receptors in this study. Furthermore, it will be interesting to isolate the enantiomers of selected analogs and subjected these to detailed pharmacologically characterization. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION Purification performed using prepacked ISOLUTE IST flash columns, ISOLUTE SCX cation exchange columns or preparative LC-MS (See supporting information). All final compounds displayed a purity of ≥95 % (ELS). General procedure for alkylating compound 15 (16-23): Tetracyclic compound 15 (15 mg, 0.07 mmol, 1.00 eq) was dissolved in DMSO (2 mL) and added DIPEA (20 μL, 0.11 mmol, 1.64 eq.) and alkyl bromide (1.6 eq.). The mixture was heated to 60 °C and stirred over night in a sealed vial under argon. Additional alkyl bromide (0.8 eq.) was added and reaction mixture stirred at 60 °C for 24 h. The mixtures was purified through a SCX cation-exchange column, concentrated in vacuo on a centrifuge, dissolved in 180 μL DMSO and purified using preparative LC-MS. General procedure for benzylating compound 15 (24-27): Tetracyclic compound 15 (15 mg, 0.07 mmol, 1.00 eq) was dissolved in DMSO (2 mL) and added DIPEA (20 μL, 0.11 mmol, 1.64 eq.) and benzyl bromide (1.6 eq.). The reaction mixture was stirred over night at room temperature. The mixtures was purified through a SCX cation-exchange column, concentrated in vacuo on a centrifuge, dissolved in 180 μL DMSO and purified using preparative LC-MS. General procedure for sulphonation and deprotection of compound 28 (29-31 and 33-41): Boc-protected tetracyclic compound 28 (75 mg, 0.24 mmol, 1.00 eq) was weight out in a 4 mL vial, added toluene (1.2 mL) and tetrabutylammonium hydrogensulfate (8 mg, 0.02 mmol, 0.10 eq). The substituted benzenesulfonyl chloride (1.25 eq) and 16 % NaOH (1 mL) was

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

added sequentially. The vial was sealed and the mixture was stirred vigorously at room temperature for 2 – 3 h. The organic phase was isolated and the aqueous phase was reextracted with toluene (2 x 2 mL). The organic phases were combined, washed with brine (2 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered, concentrated in vacuo and purified by flash chromatography to yield a clear oil. The oil was dissolved in Et2O (1.5 mL) and MeOH (1.5 mL) before 2M HCl in Et2O (1.5 mL) was added. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h under argon. The mixture was concentrated in vacuo, dissolved in water (8 mL), added 2M NaOH (2 mL) and EtOAc (10 mL). After thorough mixing the mixture was filtered, the organic phase isolated and the aqueous phase reextracted with EtOAc (10 mL). The combined organic phases was washed with brine (10 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. ASSOCIATED CONTENT Supporting information Experimental procedures and full characterization of all new compounds including 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectre and pharmacological methods. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org. AUTHOR INFORMATION † Authors have contributed equally to this article. Corresponding Author *Phone: +45 36 43 32 32. E-mail: [email protected]. Notes The Authors declare no competing financial interest ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The chemistry described was conducted at H. Lundbeck A/S. We gratefully acknowledge the research facilities and materials provided by H. Lundbeck A/S and Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, The Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Copenhagen. Niels Krogsgaard-Larsen was supported by a DRA PhD scholarship provided by the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Copenhagen in collaboration with H. Lundbeck A/S. Anders A. Jensen was supported by the Novo Nordisk Foundation and the Aase and Ejnar Danielsen Foundation. The cDNA of the human 5-HT2C receptor was a kind gift from Drs. Alan Saltzman and Stuart Sealfon.

ABBREVIATIONS PD: Parkinson’s disease; SZ: Schizophrenia; AD: Alzheimers disease; CNS: Central nervous system. REFERENCES (1) Millan, M. J.; Maiofiss, L.; Cussac, D.; Audinot, V.; Boutin, J. A.; Newman-Tancredi, A. Differential actions of antiparkinson agents at multiple classes of monoaminergic receptor. I. A multivariate analysis of the binding profiles of 14 drugs at 21 native and cloned human receptor subtypes. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2002, 303, 791-804. (2) Rascol, O.; Payoux, P.; Ory, F.; Ferreira, J. J.; Brefel-Courbon, C.; Montastruc, J.-L. Limitations of current Parkinson's disease therapy. Ann. Neurol. 2003, 53, S3-S15. (3) Lewis, D. A.; Gonzalez-Burgos, G. Pathophysiologically based treatment interventions in schizophrenia. Nat. Med. 2006, 12, 10161022. (4) Rosenzweig-Lipson, S.; Dunlop, J.; Schechter, L. E.; Comery, T. A.; Gross, J.; Marquis, K. L. 5-HT2C and 5-HT6 Receptor targeted emerging approaches in schizophrenia. In Targets and Emerging Therapies

for Schizophrenia; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012; pp 273-294. (5) Miyamoto, S.; Duncan, G. E.; Marx, C. E.; Lieberman, J. A. Treatments for schizophrenia: a critical review of pharmacology and mechanisms of action of antipsychotic drugs. Mol. Psychiatry 2004, 10, 79-104. (6) Geldenhuys, W. J.; Van der Schyf, C. J. Serotonin 5-HT6 receptor antagonists for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2008, 8, 1035-1048. (7) Scarpini, E.; Schelterns, P.; Feldman, H. Treatment of Alzheimer's disease; current status and new perspectives. The Lancet Neurol. 2003, 2, 539-547. (8) Rosse, G.; Schaffhauser, H. 5-HT6 Receptor antagonists as potential therapeutics for cognitive impairment. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2010, 10, 207-221. (9) Ninomiya, I.; Kiguchi, T. Chapter 1 Ergot Alkaloids. In The Alkaloids: Chemistry and Pharmacology; Brossi, A., Ed., Academic Press: San Diego, California, 1990; pp 1-156. (10) Roesch-Ely, D.; Gohring, K.; Gruschka, P.; Kaiser, S.; Pfuller, U.; Burlon, M.; Weisbrod, M. Pergolide as adjuvant therapy to amisulpride in the treatment of negative and depressive symptoms in schizophrenia. Pharmacopsychiatry 2006, 39, 115-116. (11) Sekine, Y.; Takei, N.; Suzuki, K.; Nakamura, K.; Tsuchiya, K. J.; Takebayashi, K.; Toulopoulou, T.; Mori, N. Effective adjunctive use of pergolide with quetiapine for cognitive impairment and negative symptoms in schizophrenia. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2005, 25, 281-283. (12) Bonuccelli, U. Comparing dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2003, 16, Suppl 1, S13-S19. (13) Radad, K.; Gille, G.; Rausch, W. D. Short review on dopamine agonists: Insight into clinical and research studies relevant to Parkinson's disease. Pharmacol. Rep. 2005, 57, 701-712. (14) Krogsgaard-Larsen, N.; Begtrup, M.; Frydenvang, K.; Kehler, J. Syntheses of aza-analogous iso-ergoline scaffolds using carbene mediated C–H insertion. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 9297-9303. (15) Liljefors, T.; Bøgesø, K. P.; Hyttel, J.; Wikstroem, H.; Svensson, K.; Carlsson, A. Pre- and postsynaptic dopaminergic activities of indolizidine and quinolizidine derivatives of 3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-(npropyl)piperidine (3-PPP). Further developments of a dopamine receptor model. J. Med. Chem. 1990, 33, 1015-1022. (16) Novi, F.; Millan, M. J.; Corsini, G. U.; Maggio, R. Partial agonist actions of aripiprazole and the candidate antipsychotics S33592, bifeprunox, N-desmethylclozapine and preclamol at dopamine D2L receptors are modified by co-transfection of D3 receptors: potential role of heterodimer formation. J. Neurochem. 2007, 102, 1410-1424. (17) Wang, C.; Jiang, Y.; Ma, J.; Wu, H.; Wacker, D.; Katritch, V.; Han, G. W.; Liu, W.; Huang, X.-P.; Vardy, E.; McCorvy, J. D.; Gao, X.; Zhou, E.; Melcher, K.; Zhang, C.; Bai, F.; Yang, H.; Yang, L.; Jiang, H.; Roth, B. L.; Cherezov, V.; Stevens, R. C.; Xu, H. E. Structural basis for molecular recognition at serotonin receptors. Science 2013, 340, 610614. (18) Tfelt-Hansen, P.; Saxena, P. R.; Dahlöf, C.; Pascual, J.; Láinez, M.; Henry, P.; Diener, H.; Schoenen, J.; Ferrari, M. D.; Goadsby, P. J. Ergotamine in the acute treatment of migraine: A review and european consensus. Brain 2000, 123, 9-18. (19) Gloriam, D. E.; Foord, S. M.; Blaney, F. E; Garland, S. L.; Definition of the G protein-coupled receptor transmembrane bundle binding pocket and calculation of receptor similarities for drug design. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 4429-4442. (20) Millan, M. J.; Maiofiss, L.; Cussac, D.; Audinot, V.; Boutin, J. A.; Newman-Tancredi, A. Differential actions of antiparkinson agents at multiple classes of monoaminergic receptor. I. A multivariate analysis of the binding profiles of 14 drugs at 21 native and cloned human receptor subtypes. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2002, 303, 791-804. (21) Newman-Tancredi, A.; Cussac, D.; Audinot, V.; Nicolas, J. P.; De Ceuninck, F.; Boutin, J. A.; Millan, M. J. Differential actions of antiparkinson agents at multiple classes of monoaminergic receptor. II. Agonist and antagonist properties at subtypes of dopamine D2-like

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

receptor and α1/α2-adrenoceptor. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2002, 303, 805-814. (22) Cosi, C.; Carilla-Durand, E.; Assié, M. B.; Ormiere, A. M.; Maraval, M.; Leduc, N.; Newman-Tancredi, A. Partial agonist properties of the antipsychotics SSR181507, aripiprazole and bifeprunox at dopamine D2 receptors: G protein activation and prolactin release. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2006, 535, 135-144. (23) Masri, B.; Salahpour, A.; Didriksen, M.; Ghisi, V.; Beaulieu, J.M.; Gainetdinov, R. R.; Caron, M. G. Antagonism of dopamine D2 receptor/β-arrestin 2 interaction is a common property of clinically effective antipsychotics. PNAS 2008, 105, 13656-13661. (24) Del'Guidice, T.; Lemay, F.; Lemasson, M.; Levasseur-Moreau, J.; Manta, S.; Etievant, A.; Escoffier, G.; Doré, F. Y.; Roman, F. S.; Beaulieu, J. M. Stimulation of 5-HT2C receptors improves cognitive deficits induced by human tryptophan hydroxylase 2 loss of function mutation. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014, 39, 1125-1134. (25) Rosenzweig-Lipson, S.; Dunlop, J.; Marquis, K. L. 5-HT2C receptor agonists as an innovative approach for psychiatric disorders. Drug News Perspect. 2007, 20, 565-571. (26) López-Rodríguez, M. L.; Benhamú, B.; de la Fuente, T.; Sanz, A.; Pardo, L.; Campillo, M. A three-dimensional pharmacophore model for 5-Hydroxytryptamine6 (5-HT6) receptor antagonists. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 4216-4219. (27) Slassi, A.; Isaac, M.; O’Brien, A. Recent progress in 5-HT6 receptor antagonists for the treatment of CNS diseases. Exp. Opin. Ther. Pat. 2002, 12, 513-527. (28) Kohen, R.; Metcalf, M. A.; Khan, N.; Druck, T.; Huebner, K.; Lachowicz, J. E.; Meltzer, H. Y.; Sibley, D. R.; Roth, B. L.; Hamblin, M. W. Cloning, characterization, and chromosomal localization of a human 5-HT6 serotonin receptor. J. Neurochem. 1996, 66, 47-56. (29) Heal, D. J.; Smith, S. L.; Fisas, A.; Codony, X.; Buschmann, H. Selective 5-HT6 receptor ligands: Progress in the development of a novel pharmacological approach to the treatment of obesity and related metabolic disorders. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008, 117, 207-231.

(30) Codony, X.; Vela, J. M.; Ramírez, M. J. 5-HT6 receptor and cognition. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2011, 11, 94-100. (31) Powis, G.; More, D. J.; Wilke, T. J.; Santone, K. S.; A highperformance liquid chromatography assay for measuring integrated biphenyl metabolism by intact cells: Its use with rat liver and human liver and kidney. Anal. Biochem. 1987, 167, 191-198. (32) Sleight, A. J.; Boess, F. G.; Bös, M.; Levet-Trafit, B.; Riemer, C.; Bourson, A. Characterization of Ro 04-6790 and Ro 63-0563: potent and selective antagonists at human and rat 5-HT6 receptors. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1998, 124, 556-562. (33) Arnt, J.; Bang-Andersen, B.; Grayson, B.; Bymaster, F. P.; Cohen, M. P.; DeLapp, N. W.; Giethlen, B.; Kreilgaard, M.; McKinzie, D. L.; Neill, J. C.; Nelson, D. L.; Nielsen, S. M.; Poulsen, M. N.; Schaus, J. M.; Witten, L. M. Lu AE58054, a 5-HT6 antagonist, reverses cognitive impairment induced by subchronic phencyclidine in a novel object recognition test in rats. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010, 13, 10211033. (34) Knight, A.; Misra, A.; Quirk, K.; Benwell, K.; Revell, D.; Kennett, G.; Bickerdike, M. Pharmacological characterisation of the agonist radioligand binding site of 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B and 5-HT2C receptors. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 2004, 370, 114-123. (35) Hirst, W. D.; Minton, J. A. L.; Bromidge, S. M.; Moss, S. F.; Latter, A. J.; Riley, G.; Routledge, C.; Middlemiss, D. N.; Price, G. W. Characterization of [125I]-SB-258585 binding to human recombinant and native 5-HT6 receptors in rat, pig and human brain tissue. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2000, 130, 1597-1605. (36) Witten, L.; Bang-Andersen, B.; Nielsen, S. M.; Miller, S.; Christoffersen, C. T.; Stensbol, T. B.; Brennum, L. T.; Arnt, J. Characterization of [3H]Lu AE60157 ([3H]8-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)-3phenylsulfonylquinoline) binding to 5-hydroxytryptamine6 (5-HT6) receptors in vivo. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 676, 6-11. (37) Nichols, D. E.; Nichols, C. D. Serotonin receptors. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 1614-1641.

TABLE OF CONTENTS GRAPHIC

N N

N H

Dopamine D2 agonist Potential Parkinson's disease therapeutic H N H N

N

N N N O

S

O

N N H

Serotonin 5 HT6 antagonist a o en co P t ti l gnitive enhancer

Ergoline analogue

Page 6 of 6

N H

Dopamine D2 partial agonist Potential antipsychotic therapeutic

ACS Paragon Plus Environment