Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV
Article
A novel peptidase Kunitz inhibitor from Platypodium elegans seeds is active against Spodoptera frugiperda larvae Suellen Rodrigues Ramalho, Cezar da Silva Bezerra, Daniella Gorete Lourenço de Oliveira, Letícia Souza Lima, Simone Maria Neto, Caio Fernando Ramalho de Oliveira, Newton Valério Verbisck, and Maria Lígia Rodrigues Macedo J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04159 • Publication Date (Web): 14 Dec 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on December 14, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
A novel peptidase Kunitz inhibitor from Platypodium elegans seeds is active
2
against Spodoptera frugiperda larvae
3 4
Suellen Rodrigues Ramalho1,3, Cézar da Silva Bezerra1,3, Daniella Gorete Lourenço de
5
Oliveira3, Letícia Souza Lima3, Simone Maria Neto3, Caio Fernando Ramalho de
6
Oliveira3, Newton Valério Verbisck4, Maria Lígia Rodrigues Macedo3*
7 8
1
9
da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul. Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Vegetal, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e
10
2
11
SBBq, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.
12
3
13
Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul, 79070-
14
900, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.
15
4
16
*Corresponding author: Maria Lígia Rodrigues Macedo. Phone +55 67 33457612, e-
17
mail:
[email protected] Programa Multicêntrico de Pós-Graduação em Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular,
Laboratório de Purificação de Proteínas e suas Funções Biológicas, Centro de
Embrapa Gado de Corte, 79106-550, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.
18
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
19
Abstract
20
A novel Kunitz-type inhibitor from Platypodium elegans seeds (PeTI) was purified and
21
characterized. The mass spectrometry analyses of PeTI indicated an intact mass of
22
19,701 Da, and a partial sequence homologous to Kunitz inhibitors. PeTI was purified
23
by ion exchange and affinity chromatographies. A complex with a 1:1 ratio was
24
obtained only for bovine trypsin, showing a Ki = 0.16 nM. Stability studies showed that
25
PeTI was stable over a wide range of temperature (37–80 °C) and pH (2–10). The
26
inhibitory activity of PeTI was affected by dithiothreitol (DTT). Bioassays of PeTI on
27
Spodoptera frugiperda showed negative effects on larval development and weight gain,
28
besides to extend the insect life cycle. The activities of digestive enzymes, trypsin and
29
chymotrypsin, were reduced by feeding larvae with 0.2% PeTI in an artificial diet. In
30
summary, we describe a novel Kunitz inhibitor with promising biotechnological potential
31
for pest control.
32 33
Keywords: Kunitz-type inhibitor, Fabaceae, pest insect, trypsin inhibitor, Spodoptera
34
frugiperda.
35 36
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 46
Page 3 of 46
37
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Introduction
38
Insects are the most dispersed group of organisms. Part this success is associated with
39
the ability to obtain food from different sources. This adaptation to a wide variety of food
40
sources (e.g. plants) created a high insect diversity1. Among the insects that evolved
41
phytophagous habits, a complex interface has been originated during millions of years of
42
plant-insect interaction2. Some beneficial interactions such as pollination emerged, while
43
negative ones, including herbivory, imposed to plants risks of primary and secondary
44
attacks since insects’ wounding and chewing allow the occurrence of infections provoked
45
by opportunistic microrganisms3,
46
biochemical arsenal against these attacks, which have been refined in tissue-specific
47
responses, triggered by chemical stimuli or genetic factors5, 6.
4
. Along with this co-evolution, plants evolved a
48
Peptidase inhibitors (PIs) are multifunctional proteins, attending both storage protein
49
and plant defense. When ingested by insects, the PIs form tight complexes with cognate
50
peptidases compromising the larval digestive process. These anti-nutritional molecules are
51
widely distributed in the Fabaceae, Solanaceae, and Poaceae families and have been
52
extensively studied7, 8. The biological activity of PIs has been explored for pest control.
53
Insects fed with artificial diet containing PIs of the main class of their gut peptidases show
54
negative effects on larval development9-11. Currently, the use of PIs-coding genes is been
55
investigated as a biotechnological tool for crop protection12.
56
The PIs have traditionally been classified into families known as Kunitz, Bowman-Birk,
57
Potato, Pumpkin, Barley, Cystatin and others. This classification is based on molecular
58
weight, number of polypeptide chains and number of reactive sites, type of inhibition and
59
other features. According to MEROPS database, the homologous sets of peptidases and
60
PIs are grouped into protein species, families and subfamilies. In this method of
61
classification, Kunitz inhibitors from animal sources are grouped into family I2 (Kunitz-A)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
62
and Kunitz inhibitors from plants (Kunitz-P) are grouped into family I313. Kunitz inhibitors
63
are composed of a heterogeneous group of proteins with respect to the number of
64
polypeptide chains, reactive sites, and disulfide bridges. They are active against serine
65
peptidases such as trypsin, chymotrypsin, and elastase, and some of them show activity
66
against peptidases from other families14.
67
Herein, we describe the purification and characterization of Platypodium elegans
68
trypsin inhibitor – PeTI, obtained from P. elegans seeds (Fabaceae: Caesalpinioideae). P.
69
elegans is also known as ‘Uruvalheira’ and is found in the Brazilian cerrado and transition
70
areas between the cerrado and seasonal forest15. Our group is located in the Brazilian
71
Midwest, enabling us to explore the biodiversity of the cerrado in search for new
72
molecules. Cerrado is a Brazilian biome that covers over 2 million km2 of the national
73
territory and presents a high degree of plant endemism16. There are no reports on the
74
previous application of this species in folk medicine. Furthermore, we evaluated the effects
75
of PeTI on the fall armyworm development (Spodoptera frugiperda), with a view to defining
76
its biotechnological application. The fall armyworm is an important pest of different crops,
77
including corn, soybean, and cotton, and has developed resistance against Bt-crops and
78
chemical insecticides17-19. These facts reinforce the necessity to search for new
79
alternatives to control this pest.
80
Material and Methods
81
Materials
82
P. elegans seeds were obtained from the ArboCenter company (registration at
83
Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources, IBAMA, 2082600).
84
The P. elegans seeds were collected near the city of Birigui, located in the northwest of the
85
São Paulo state (under the latitude 21º17'19" S and longitude 50º20'24" W). Bovine trypsin
86
and α-chymotrypsin, bovine serum albumin (BSA), N-α-benzoyl-DL-arginine-p-nitroanilide
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 46
Page 5 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
87
(BAPNA), N-α-benzoyl-DL-tyrosyl-p-nitroanilide (BTPNA), dithiothreitol (DTT), Succinyl-
88
alanyl-alanyl-propyl-phenyl-alanyl-p-nitroanilide
89
chloromethyl ketone (TLCK), electrophoresis and mass spectrometry reagents the
90
matrices Dihydroxybenzoic Acid (DHB) and Sinapinic Acid were purchased from Sigma
91
(St. Louis, MO, USA). Chromatography supports were acquired from GE Life Sciences
92
and Waters. Sequencing grade modified trypsin was purchased from Promega. All other
93
chemicals and reagents used were of analytical grade.
94
Insects
(SAAPFPNA),
N-p-tosyl-lysine
95
The insects were housed and maintained under laboratory conditions at the
96
Insectary-LPPFB (Laboratório de Purificação de Proteínas e suas Funções Biológicas),
97
Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul. Campo Grande, MS, Brazil. The colonies of
98
Anagasta kuehniella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and Corcyra cephalonica (Lepidoptera:
99
Pyralidae) were housed under standard conditions at 25 °C ± 2 °C, 60 – 70% relative
100
humidity (RU), 14:10 h (light:dark) and maintained on an artificial diet (wheat
101
germ:wholemeal flour; 3:2 ratio). Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) eggs were hatched in
102
dechlorinated water and maintained at 25 °C ± 2 °C, with 70 - 80% RU and a 12:12 h
103
photoperiod with cat food (Whiskas®) in the water. S. frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
104
were reared individually on the artificial diet (white bean, wheat germ, brewer’s yeast
105
powder, agar, ascorbic acid, sorbic acid, casein, nipagin, vitamin complex, tetracycline,
106
40% formaldehyde and distilled water) and maintained under standard conditions at 25 °C
107
± 2 °C, 60 – 70% RU, 14:10 h photoperiod.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
108
Methods
109
Isolation of P. elegans trypsin inhibitor (PeTI)
110
P. elegans seeds, integument-free, were dried at room temperature and stored at -
111
20 °C until use. The seeds were ground and defatted using hexane for the removal of lipid
112
content. Three changes of hexane were carried out until the liquid showed a clear aspect.
113
The defatted flour was used for crude extract preparation, obtained by extraction of this
114
meal (100 g) with 100 mM potassium phosphate pH 7.6 buffer (1:10; w/v) overnight at 4
115
ºC, with subsequent centrifugation at 13,500 g at 4 ºC for 30 min. The supernatant was
116
dialyzed against distilled water at 4 °C and lyophilized. For PeTI purification, the crude
117
extract (150 mg) was dissolved in a 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer pH 8.0, and loaded onto a
118
DEAE-Sepharose column (2 × 20 cm) equilibrated with the same buffer. Proteins were
119
eluted in 0.25-0.6 mM NaCl in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0 at a flow rate of 40 mL/h. The
120
fractions containing inhibitory activity were pooled, dialyzed and lyophilized. For the next
121
purification step, the peak containing inhibitory activity was loaded onto a trypsin-
122
Sepharose 4B column (2 × 10 cm), equilibrated with 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH
123
7.6 containing 100 mM NaCl. The elution of PeTI was performed with 50 mM HCl at a flow
124
rate of 30 mL/h. The PeTI was subjected to a Reverse Phase High Performance Liquid
125
Chromatography (RP-HPLC), using the Waters µBondaparkTM C18 column (3.9 × 300
126
mm). The column was previously equilibrated with 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid (solvent
127
A), followed by a linear gradient from 0-95% (v/v) of acetonitrile in 0.1% (v/v) aqueous
128
trifluoroacetic acid (solvent B) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. All purification steps were
129
monitored at 280 nm.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 46
Page 7 of 46
130
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Protein quantification
131
Protein concentration was determined by Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 staining,
132
as described by Bradford20. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used as standard protein to
133
obtain a standard calibration curve.
134
Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
135
Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was
136
performed according to Laemmli21 using low range molecular weight standards (14.4 –
137
97.4 kDa). The proteins were separated on the gels and subsequently detected by staining
138
the gel with 0.1% (w/v) Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 and removal of excess staining
139
carried out with a solution of distilled water, methanol and acetic acid (5:4:1 – v/v/v).
140
Protein digestion, mass spectrometry and amino acid sequencing
141
The PeTI HPLC fraction was freeze-dried and dissolved in 1% (v/v) TFA. The matrices,
142
2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (20 mg/mL) and sinapinic acid (10 mg/mL), were mixed
143
individually in a 1:1 proportion with sample solutions. The intact protein was analyzed in
144
linear mode by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry
145
(MALDI-TOF-MS) on an Autoflex III Smartbeam (Bruker Daltonics) apparatus. Ions were
146
generated by 1000 to 2000 laser shots with a 20 kV accelerating voltage applied. For
147
calibration, protein standards from the MSCAL1 135 Calibration Kit (Sigma- Aldrich) were
148
used. FlexAnalysis v.3.3 software (Bruker Daltonics) was used for data analyses. Peaks
149
were smoothed and the baseline correction was applied to the spectra.
150
The sample obtained from the HPLC was also submitted to SDS-PAGE (17%) under
151
reducing conditions and stained with colloidal Coomassie Blue G-250. The PeTI band was
152
excised and treated for in-gel digestion, as described by Hellman22. In brief, the gel pieces
153
were unstained by consecutive washes in 50% (v/v) acetonitrile solution containing 50 mM
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
154
ammonium bicarbonate for 15 min at room temperature, vortexing every 5 min. The
155
washes were repeated until complete gel discoloration. The washing solution was replaced
156
by 100% acetonitrile with vertical shaking for 5 min. Gel pieces were air-dried and then
157
incubated in 30 µL of 10 mM dithiothreitol in 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate solution
158
under stirring for 30 min at room temperature, for reduction of disulfide bonds. To this
159
solution, 30 µL of 50 mM iodoacetamide in 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate solution was
160
added, in the dark, for alkylation of reduced cysteine residues. The gel pieces were
161
washed with 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate solution, dehydrated in 100% acetonitrile,
162
and air-dried. In-gel protein digestion was carried out with Sequencing Grade Modified
163
Trypsin solution (Promega), protein ratio of 1:20 (w/w). Buffered trypsin (1 µg) was added
164
to the gel tube and incubated on ice for 1 h. Next, 30 µL of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate
165
was added and incubated at 37 ºC for 16 h. The digested supernatant was collected,
166
freeze-dried and re-suspended in 5 µL of 0.1% TFA in 50% (v/v) acetonitrile. The sample
167
was mixed in a 1:1 ratio with the matrix solution (10 mg/mL α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic
168
acid, 1% (v/v) TFA and 70% (v/v) acetonitrile) and 2 µL applied onto a MALDI target plate.
169
After crystallization at room temperature, the peptides derived from tryptic digestion were
170
analyzed using an UltraFlex Extreme MALDI-TOF/TOF (BrukerDaltonics), precisely
171
calibrated with Tryptic Digest of Bovine Serum Albumin (BrukerDaltonics). The mass
172
spectrometer was operated in reflector mode for MS acquisitions and LIFT mode for
173
tandem MS (MS/MS). Protein identification was carried out by peptide de novo
174
sequencing. Sequenced peptides were directly correlated to NCBI non-redundant protein
175
database using the BLASTp search system23. The sequences that showed the highest
176
identities from different organisms were selected and submitted to signal peptide predictor
177
using Phobius web serve24. After signal peptide removal, the sequences were aligned
178
using the CLUSTAL O (1.2.4) software with the multiple alignment tools.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 46
Page 9 of 46
179 180
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Midgut preparation The larvae were cold immobilized, and midguts were dissected, according to 25
181
Macedo, et al.
. The midguts were then homogenized with a hand-held Potter-Elvehjem
182
in isosmotic solution (150 mM NaCl in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0) and centrifuged at 6 000 g
183
for 20 min at 4°C. The supernatants were then collected and used for measuring their
184
protein concentrations for enzymatic activity assays or stored at -20°C.
185
Enzymatic assays
186
For inhibitory activity assays, PeTI was assayed against the bovine trypsin and
187
chymotrypsin using the substrates BAPNA and BTPNA, respectively26. For trypsin- and
188
chymotrypsin-like activity from larval midgut, we used BAPNA and SAAPFPNA as
189
substrates, respectively27. A stock solution of BAPNA (100 mM), SAAPFPNA (100 mM)
190
and BTPNA (100 mM) was prepared in DMSO. All substrates were diluted in a working
191
solution (1 mM) in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0. The SAAPFPNA working solution buffer
192
was prepared in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0 containing 20% (v/v) dimethylformamide.
193
Aliquots of 4 µL of bovine trypsin (0.25 mg/mL) were incubated with PeTI in 50 mM Tris–
194
HCl buffer, pH 8.0. After a 5 min incubation at 30 °C, 200 µL of 1 mM BAPNA were added
195
(final 270 µL assay volume). The total time of assays was 30 min. For the chymotrypsin
196
assay, 5 µL of bovine chymotrypsin (1 mg/mL) were incubated with PeTI in 50 mM Tris–
197
HCl buffer, pH 8.0. After 5 min of incubation at 30 °C, we added 100 µL of 1 mM BTPNA
198
(final 120 µL assay volume). The total time of the assay was 5 min. The substrate
199
hydrolysis was monitored by changes in absorbance at 410 nm, after subtracting the
200
blank, using a Multiskan Microplate Reader (Thermo Scientific), and the results showed as
201
specific activity (ng substrate/min/µg protein). One unit of inhibitory activity was defined as
202
the amount of inhibitor responsible to decrease 0.01 absorbance unit at 280 nm.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
203
For measuring the trypsin-like activity assay from larval midgut enzymes, samples of 1
204
µg of larval midgut homogenate were incubated with the assay buffer, and then 200 µL of
205
BAPNA were added to a final volume of 270 µL. The assay was conducted for 30 min at
206
30 °C. For the chymotrypsin-like activity assay, samples of 1 µg of larval midgut
207
homogenate were incubated with the assay buffer, and 20 µL of SAAPFPNA was then
208
added to a final volume of 120 µL. The assay was carried out for 5 min at 30 °C. To
209
analyze the sensitivity of insect trypsin to inhibition by PeTI, an inhibition curve was made
210
with increasing concentrations of PeTI (0–0.5 µg), and the inhibitory activity measured as
211
described above.
212
Ki determination and stoichiometry inhibition
213
Bovine trypsin was incubated with different concentrations of PeTI and residual
214
inhibitory activity was recorded. To determine the dissociation constant (Ki), the slow tight-
215
binding inhibition method, described by Morrison
216
of PeTI (0; 0.3; 0.15 nM) were added to a fixed concentration of trypsin (4.2 nM), and the
217
residual enzymatic activity was determined. The Ki value was determined as the average
218
of three independent assays and obtained with the aid of a Sigma Plot (Systat Software
219
Inc.).
220
Stability of inhibitory activity
28
, was used. Increasing concentrations
221
Stability studies were performed as described by Oliveira, et al.26. The inhibitor
222
sample (0.3 mg/mL in 50 mM Tris−HCl buffer, pH 8.0) was heated for 30 min at different
223
temperatures (30−100 °C), and then submitted to inhibitory activity assays. To measure
224
pH stability, a solution of PeTI (0.3 mg/mL) was diluted with an equal volume of various
225
buffers (100 mM): sodium citrate (pH 2−4), sodium acetate (pH 5), sodium phosphate (pH
226
6−7), Tris−HCl (pH 8) and sodium bicarbonate (pH 9−10). After incubation in each buffer
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 46
Page 11 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
227
for 1 h at 30°C, the pH was adjusted to pH 8.0 and the inhibitory activity against trypsin
228
was assayed. PeTI was incubated with DTT at final concentrations of 1, 10 and 100 mM
229
for 15–120 min at 30°C. The reaction was completed by adding iodoacetamide at twice the
230
amount of each DTT concentration, and the residual inhibitory activity of trypsin was
231
determined. All experiments were carried out in triplicate.
232
Screening assay for inhibition of insect trypsins
233
The ability of PeTI to inhibit trypsin from different insect pests was evaluated in vitro.
234
The fourth-instar larvae of A. kuehniella, C. cephalonica, A. aegypti and S. frugiperda were
235
used for obtaining the midgut extract containing digestive enzymes. Samples of 2 µg of
236
midgut extract were incubated with increasing concentrations of PeTI (0 – 0.2 µg) for 10
237
min at 30 ºC, and then 200 µL of BAPNA was added to a final volume of 270 µL. The
238
assay was conducted for 30 min at 30 °C, monitoring the absorbance at 410 nm. All
239
assays were carried out in triplicate. The activity of the positive control, midgut samples
240
without PeTI, was set as 100% of trypsin activity.
241
Bioassays
242
S. frugiperda was the species chosen further bioassays. Neonate larvae were
243
individually placed in glass tubes (8.5 x 2 cm) containing artificial diet (control) or a diet
244
supplemented with 0.2% PeTI (w/w). The larvae were kept on these respective diets until
245
reaching the fifth instar, after approximately 11 days, under standard conditions. Each
246
treatment was composed of 40 larvae. Subsequently, the larvae were dissected for
247
obtaining the midgut extract. To determine effects on the insect life cycle, the same
248
bioassays were performed. In these bioassays, the larvae were fed until pupation. The
249
number of emerging moths was counted and the moths were kept in cages while
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
250
remaining alive, to evaluate the possibility of total lifetime changes after PeTI exposure. All
251
experimental results represent the average of three independent bioassays.
252
Digestion of PeTI by S. frugiperda midgut enzymes
253
PeTI was incubated with S. frugiperda larval midgut homogenate at 30 °C in a ratio
254
of 1:5 (inhibitor: midgut homogenate) for 0, 1, 3, 6 and 12 h. The digestion was stopped by
255
immersing the tubes in boiling water for 2 min. The degradation of BSA was used as a
256
positive control for proteolytic activity and the digestion time intervals of 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4
257
and 5 h were used. After digestion, the samples were separated by SDS-PAGE 15%.
258
Statistical analysis
259
Data were analyzed using Student's t-test for comparing two sets of data. The one-
260
way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc test was used for multiple
261
comparisons. A p-value of 70 °C), we observed a significant decrease in inhibitory activity (Table 3).
306
At 100 ºC, the inhibitory activity was reduced by 75%. Different pH values, ranging from
307
2.0 to 10.0, exerted no effect on PeTI activity (Table 3). In regard to DTT incubation, all
308
concentrations evaluated led to reductions in inhibitory activity, but during different
309
incubation periods. At 1 mM, DTT promoted a significant reduction in inhibition after 60
310
min of incubation. For higher DTT concentrations, the reduction in inhibitory activity was
311
seen at all incubation times: 15, 30, 60 and 120 min (Table 4).
312
Screening assay for inhibition of insect trypsins
313
The midgut extracts from 4 insects were incubated with different PeTI concentrations
314
and a gradual inhibition of the trypsin was observed (Figure 5). PeTI displayed a strong
315
inhibition of trypsin enzymes from A. kuehniella and C. cephalonica, even at low inhibitor
316
concentration (0.025 µg). At a higher concentration (0.2 µg), PeTI almost completely
317
inhibited the trypsin activity of A. kuehniella (95%), C. cephalonica (90%), A. aegypti (82%)
318
and S. frugiperda (95%). Based in this result, we further investigated the effects of PeTI on
319
S. frugiperda development.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 46
Page 15 of 46
320
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Effects of PeTI on S. frugiperda development
321
An artificial diet containing 0.2% PeTI (w/w) was used in bioassays. At the fifth-instar,
322
the average larval weight in PeTI-fed larvae decreased by 55% (Figure 6A). In comparison
323
with larvae from the control group, no significant difference in survival rate was observed in
324
PeTI-fed larvae (Figure 6B). The duration of larval stage was significantly extended (Table
325
5), while the pupal and adult stages were not altered. Anyway, the Total Development
326
Time (TDT) was increased, indicating that the exposition of S. frugiperda larvae to PeTI
327
prompts the extension of S. frugiperda life cycle.
328
Effects of PeTI on S. frugiperda enzymes
329
The ingestion of PeTI affected the activity of digestive enzymes of S. frugiperda larvae.
330
The trypsin and chymotrypsin activities in PeTI-fed larvae were reduced by 59 and 17%,
331
respectively (Figure 7A and 7B). In order to verify whether the S. frugiperda trypsins
332
remained sensitive to PeTI after chronic exposure, the midgut extract was incubated with
333
increasing concentrations of inhibitor to compare the residual trypsin activities. Results of
334
this assay indicated that the trypsins from PeTI-fed larvae became resistant to inhibition
335
(Figure 7C).
336
PeTI digestion by S. frugiperda midgut enzymes
337
As the ingestion of PeTI triggered the change in trypsin composition, we evaluated the
338
capacity of midgut enzymes to digest PeTI during in vitro incubation. The band of 20 kDa,
339
corresponding to PeTI, remained intact after incubation in both midgut samples at all
340
intervals, indicating PeTI resistance to proteolysis by S. frugiperda midgut enzymes
341
(Figure 8A). The positive control (BSA) was completely digested within 1 h while the
342
complete digestion of BSA by midgut sample from PeTI-fed larvae occurred between 1
343
and 3 h (Figure 8B).
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
344
Discussion
345
PeTI, a trypsin inhibitor, was purified using a two-step procedure: ion exchange and
346
bioaffinity chromatographies. This procedure has been shown to effectively purify PIs from
347
legume seeds and other source29,
348
showed a single band in SDS–PAGE and was denominated PeTI. A series of experimental
349
data allowed us to conclude that PeTI is a Kunitz inhibitor, as indicated by its molecular
350
mass, obtained by MALDI-TOF spectrometry, and finally, partial sequencing by mass
351
spectrometry.
30
. The fraction obtained from Trypsin-Sepharose
352
Multiple sequence alignment methods are important for identifying highly conserved
353
residues that are essential for stability or function of the protein. There are many
354
conserved regions in plant-Kunitz type inhibitors; such as Asp4, Gly7, Gly13, Tyr-Tyr16,17,
355
Pro20, Arg-Gly23, 24, Gly-Gly-Gly26-28, Gly53, Pro55 (PeTI numbering) (Figure 4). The
356
RNG domain is present in the partial primary amino acid sequence of PeTI. The conserved
357
Asn12 residue (PeTI numbering) contained in this domain modulate the inhibitory activity
358
by stabilizing the peptidase-inhibitor complex. According to Iwanaga, et al. 31, Asn residues
359
provide structural support in N-terminal region for stabilization of the primary binding loop
360
via hydrogen bonds.
361
Partial PeTI sequence obtained by mass spectrometry revealed a specific region
362
containing arginine–glycine-rich (RGG) motifs, as well as observed in [XP_006372631.1]
363
and [ADW95389.1] sequences, suggesting a wide network of protein-protein interactions
364
through the RGG motif (Figure 4). Arg/Gly-rich motifs play an important role in several
365
physiological processes via the arginine methylation of RGG/RG protein motifs32. The
366
RGD motif was described in peptidase inhibitor from Bauhinia rufa seeds (BrTI)33 and
367
cardosin A, an aspartic peptidase inhibitor from Cynara cardunculus34, 35.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 46
Page 17 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
368
Kinetic studies showed that PeTI inhibits both trypsin and chymotrypsin, but the
369
inhibitory activity for chymotrypsin is weaker (Table 2). From this analysis, we observed
370
that the equimolar amount of PeTI necessary to inhibit 100% of trypsin activity inhibited
371
only 30% of chymotrypsin activity. PIs can inhibit specifically trypsin, such as
372
Caesalpinia echinata trypsin inhibitor (CeKI)36, as also inhibit only chymotrypsin37, or
373
both enzyme38. Based on stoichiometric studies, we demonstrated that PeTI is a
374
single-headed Kunitz inhibitor with higher activity against trypsin than chymotrypsin.
375
This difference in affinity is due to the reactive site composition, as observed in
376
soybean inhibitors. We also suggest that binding of chymotrypsin to PeTi has a non-
377
specific component, explaining the weak inhibition observed, since both enzymes
378
belong to the same family and have similar catalysis mechanisms, with singular
379
peculiarities. In stoichiometric studies, PeTI inhibited trypsin at a molar ratio of 1:1
380
(inhibitor: enzyme) (Figure 2), confirming the presence of a single reactive site for
381
trypsin. Similar results were reported from inhibitors isolated from Leucaena
382
leucocephala39, Poincianella pyramidalis40 and Pithecellobium dulce41. The PeTI Ki
383
value for bovine trypsin was 0.16 nM, indicating a high affinity. The deconvolution of
384
data revealed that PeTI is a competitive inhibitor, similarly to PIs from Putranjiva
385
roxburghii42. Additionally, PeTI is very potent inhibitor because it inhibits hydrolysis of
386
trypsin at low concentrations.
387
PIs exhibit considerable stability to temperature, pH, denaturing agents and
388
proteolysis26,
29, 38, 43
389
bonds and other non-covalent interactions44. PeTI also showed these properties, being
390
active and stable after incubation up to 70 ºC and over a range of pH, as seen for other
391
PIs from other species of legumes, including Moringa oleifeira29 and Piptadenia
392
moniliformis45.In contrast, the PeTI inhibitory activity was sensitive to all concentrations
. These stabilities may be attributed to the presence of disulfide
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 18 of 46
393
of DTT after 30 min of incubation. A similar result was reported for ILTI46, a trypsin
394
inhibitor from Inga laurina. The loss of inhibitory activity is attributed to reduction of
395
disulfide bonds, with reflections on other non-covalent interactions that stabilize the
396
reactive site of the inhibitor47. According to Joshi and collaborators44, disulfide bonds
397
are collectively responsible for the functional activity of PIs by maintaining the
398
conformational rigidity and function of PIs. Other authors, however, have reported PIs
399
where the disulfide bridges are more involved in the maintenance of native folding than
400
reactive site structure26.
401
PIs have been identified as potential candidates for the development of insect-
402
resistant transgenic crops, targeting digestive enzymes of pests5,
403
inhibitory activities of PIs on insect enzymes are variable, according to their structures
404
and specificities, which makes in vitro preliminary screening necessary to select better
405
targets, as evaluated in bioassays45,
406
bovine trypsin enzyme, we verified its inhibitory activity against midgut trypsins from the
407
insect orders Lepidoptera and Diptera. In vitro, PeTI strongly inhibited the trypsin-like
408
activity of the four economically important pests (Figure 5). S. frugiperda trypsins were
409
successfully inhibited and, hence, selected for further assays, based on the possibility
410
of controlling this pest using transgenic plants.
49
30, 48
. However, the
. Based on PeTI effectiveness in suppressing
411
An essential aspect of the successful use of PIs in pest control constitutes the
412
prevention of their inactivation in the insect midgut. The high alkalinity of the
413
lepidopteran midgut environment and the activity of several peptidases are one of the
414
main barriers that an ingested inhibitor must overcome50. In our study, PeTI maintained
415
inhibitory activity over a wide range of pH (Table 3). Some insects are able to degrade
416
the PIs using constitutively expressed51 or induced52 peptidases as an adaptive
417
strategy to overcome plant defenses. S. frugiperda midgut peptidases that were either
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 19 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
418
constitutively expressed or induced were unable to degrade PeTI, even during long
419
incubation periods (Figure 8A). Additionally, BSA (used as a positive control) was
420
readily degraded in control-fed larvae (Figure 8B), while a longer incubation period was
421
necessary to complete degradation using PeTI-fed larvae as an enzyme source (Figure
422
8B), signifying that the ability of PeTI to bind to digestive enzymes might impair protein
423
digestion. As such, PeTI represents a good candidate for further studies as an anti-
424
nutritional protein for insect control management.
425
Bioassays demonstrated that the ingestion of PeTI led to changes in S. frugiperda
426
development and digestive physiology. Although PeTI does not induce larval mortality,
427
there was a meaningful reduction in larval weight gain (Figure 6A), beyond the
428
extension of the larval stage (Table 5), and probably associated with a reduced amino
429
acid availability due to the inhibition of the trypsin and chymotrypsin enzymes (Figure
430
7). The rapid growth rate of lepidopteran larvae depends on the efficient acquisition
431
and utilization of essential amino acids acquired from the diet53. Therefore, the
432
inhibition of proteolytic enzymes by PeTI causes an amino acid deficiency due to the
433
disruption of dietary protein assimilation, which leads to significant delays on S.
434
frugiperda growth and development, as reported in other studies9, 30, 43. These delays
435
may be an important strategy for pest control, since it may increase the exposure time
436
of larvae to their natural enemies (predators and pathogens), contributing to integrated
437
pest management54, 55.
438
It is known, however, that S. frugiperda possesses adaptive mechanisms against
439
PIs, such as the overexpression of peptidases resistant to inhibition27. We, herein,
440
observed that the trypsin enzymes from PeTI-fed larvae presented insensitivity to
441
inhibition by PeTI (Figure 7C), but no increase in enzymatic activity was noted,
442
suggesting a changing of peptidase profile expression (sensitive to resistant trypsins),
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
443
maintaining the same level of midgut proteolysis. The synthesis of PeTI-insensitive
444
trypsin is a costly process, and the energy spent from this process possibly caused the
445
delay observed in S. frugiperda development. Moreover, the ingestion of PIs may affect
446
not only protein metabolism, but other pathways. Kuwar and collaborators56 showed
447
that the ingestion of soybean Kunitz trypsin inhibitor (SKTI) by Helicoverpa armigera
448
affected not only peptidase genes, but also affected genes associated with stress,
449
carbohydrate metabolism, lipid metabolism, immune defense and detoxification
450
pathways. Therefore, it would be interesting to investigate the influence of PeTI on
451
other metabolic pathways further.
452
In conclusion, this is the first report of a PI isolated from P. elegans seeds. PeTI is a
453
single-headed Kunitz inhibitor composed by a single polypeptide chain, active against
454
trypsin enzymes and moderately active against chymotrypsin. PeTI presents
455
moderately stability to temperature (up to 80 °C), resistant to proteolysis and pH
456
ranging, but is inactivated by longer exposition to heat, suggesting that its use in a
457
transgenic crop would not affect the final consumer. Bioassays showed that PeTI was
458
able to inhibit the trypsin enzymes from four important pests and impaired S. frugiperda
459
development via a reduction in weight gain and an extension of the life cycle. These
460
findings indicate that PeTI should be further investigated in order to compose an
461
alternative molecule for biotechnological studies, with a view to crop protection or other
462
research purposes, since all organisms possess peptidases involved in critical
463
pathways and the inhibition of these pathways could be explored in various
464
applications for pest control.
465 466
Abbreviations Used
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 20 of 46
Page 21 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
467
BAPNA,
N-benzoyl-DL-arginine-p-nitroanilide;
468
nitroanilide;
469
TLCK, N-p-tosyl-lysine chloromethyl ketone; DHB, Dihydroxybenzoic Acid; DTT,
470
dithiothreitol; BSA, bovine serum albumin; RU, Relative humidity. H, hours; TIU,
471
Trypsin inhibitor units.
SAAPFPNA,
BTPNA,
N-benzoyl-L-tyrosyl-p-
Succinyl-alanyl-alanyl-propyl-pheny-lalanyl-p-nitroanilide;
472 473
Acknowledgments
474
We are grateful to Nicola Conran for English proofreading.
475 476
Funding Sources
477
This
478
(23/200.591/2012).
work
was
supported
by
CNPq
(407127/2013-5)
and
FUNDECT
479 480
Notes
481
Conflict of interests the authors declare that they have no competing interests.
482 483
Supporting Information Available: Description
484
Supplementary Figures 1-3.
485
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
486
Reference
487
1. Futuyma, D. J.; Agrawal, A. A., Macroevolution and the biological diversity of plants and
488
herbivores. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106, 18054-18061.
489
2. Scriber, J. M., Integrating ancient patterns and current dynamics of insect–plant
490
interactions: Taxonomic and geographic variation in herbivore specialization. Insect Sci.
491
2010, 17, 471-507.
492
3. Franco, F. P.; Moura, D. S.; Vivanco, J. M.; Silva-Filho, M. C., Plant–insect–pathogen
493
interactions: a naturally complex ménage à trois. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2017, 37, 54-60.
494
4. Agrawal, A. A., Current trends in the evolutionary ecology of plant defence. Funct. Ecol.
495
2011, 25, 420-432.
496
5. Dang, L. Y.; Van Damme, E. J. M., Toxic proteins in plants. Phytochemistry 2015, 117,
497
51-64.
498
6. Kant, M. R.; Jonckheere, W.; Knegt, B.; Lemos, F.; Liu, J.; Schimmel, B. C. J.; Villarroel,
499
C. A.; Ataide, L. M. S.; Dermauw, W.; Glas, J. J.; Egas, M.; Janssen, A.; Van Leeuwen, T.;
500
Schuurink, R. C.; Sabelis, M. W.; Alba, J. M., Mechanisms and ecological consequences
501
of plant defence induction and suppression in herbivore communities. Ann. Bot. 2015, 115,
502
1015-1051.
503
7. Oliva, M. L. V.; Silva, M. C.; Sallai, R. C.; Brito, M. V.; Sampaio, M. U., A novel
504
subclassification for Kunitz proteinase inhibitors from leguminous seeds. Biochimie 2010,
505
92, 1667-1673.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 22 of 46
Page 23 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
506
8. Oliva, M. L. V.; Ferreira, R. S.; Ferreira, J. G.; de Paula, C. A. A.; Salas, C. E.; Sampaio,
507
M. U., Structural and Functional Properties of Kunitz Proteinase Inhibitors from
508
Leguminosae: A Mini Review. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2011, 12, 348-357.
509
9. Bezerra, C. S.; Oliveira, C. T.; Macedo, M. L. R., Inga vera trypsin inhibitor interferes in
510
the proteolytic activity and nutritional physiology of Ephestia kuehniella larvae. Entomol.
511
Exp. Appl., n/a-n/a.
512
10. Machado, S. W.; Oliveira, C. F. R.; Bezerra, C. S.; Freire, M. G. M.; Kill, M. R.;
513
Machado, O. L. T.; Marangoni, S.; Macedo, M. L. R., Purification of a Kunitz-type inhibitor
514
from Acacia polyphylla DC seeds: Characterization and insecticidal properties against
515
Anagasta kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013.
516
11. Jamal, F.; Pandey, P. K.; Singh, D.; Ahmed, W., A Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitor
517
from Butea monosperma seed and its influence on developmental physiology of
518
Helicoverpa armigera. Process Biochem. 2015, 50, 311-316.
519
12. Dunse, K. M.; Stevens, J. A.; Lay, F. T.; Gaspar, Y. M.; Heath, R. L.; Anderson, M. A.,
520
Coexpression of potato type I and II proteinase inhibitors gives cotton plants protection
521
against insect damage in the field. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107, 15011-5.
522
13. Rawlings, N. D.; Barrett, A. J.; Finn, R., Twenty years of the MEROPS database of
523
proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D343-
524
D350.
525
14. Migliolo, L.; Oliveira, A. S.; Santos, E. A.; Franco, O. L.; Sales, M. P., Structural and
526
mechanistic insights into a novel non-competitive Kunitz trypsin inhibitor from Adenanthera
527
pavonina L. seeds with double activity toward serine- and cysteine-proteinases. J. Mol.
528
Graph. Model. 2010, 29, 148-156.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
529
15. Lorenzi, H., Árvores brasileiras: manual de identificação e cultivo de plantas arbóreas
530
nativas do Brasil. vol. 2. Nova Odessa, Brazil: Instituto Plantarum de Estudos da Flora
531
Ltda. 352p.-col. illus.. ISBN 8586714070 Por Icones. Geog 1998, 4.
532
16. Furley, P. A., The nature and diversity of neotropical savanna vegetation with particular
533
reference to the Brazilian cerrados. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 1999, 8, 223-241.
534
17. Carvalho, R. A.; Omoto, C.; Field, L. M.; Williamson, M. S.; Bass, C., Investigating the
535
molecular mechanisms of organophosphate and pyrethroid resistance in the fall armyworm
536
Spodoptera frugiperda. PLoS One 2013, 8, e62268.
537
18. Ríos-Díez, J.; Saldamando-Benjumea, C., Susceptibility of Spodoptera frugiperda
538
(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) strains from central Colombia to two insecticides, methomyl and
539
lambda-cyhalothrin: a study of the genetic basis of resistance. J. Econ. Entomol. 2011,
540
104, 1698-1705.
541
19. Santos-Amaya, O. F.; Rodrigues, J. V.; Souza, T. C.; Tavares, C. S.; Campos, S. O.;
542
Guedes, R. N.; Pereira, E. J., Resistance to dual-gene Bt maize in Spodoptera frugiperda:
543
selection, inheritance, and cross-resistance to other transgenic events. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5.
544
20. Bradford, M., A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities
545
of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248-54.
546
21. Laemmli, U., Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of
547
bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970, 227, 680-685.
548
22. Hellman, U., Sample preparation by SDS/PAGE and in-gel digestion. In Proteomics in
549
Functional Genomics: Protein Structure Analysis, Jollès, P.; Jörnvall, H., Eds. Birkhäuser
550
Basel: Basel, 2000; pp 43-54.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 24 of 46
Page 25 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
551
23. Altschul, S. F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E. W.; Lipman, D. J., Basic local alignment
552
search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403-410.
553
24. Käll, L.; Krogh, A.; Sonnhammer, E. L. L., A Combined Transmembrane Topology and
554
Signal Peptide Prediction Method. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 338, 1027-1036.
555
25. Macedo, M. L. R.; Diz Filho, E. B.; Freire, M. G.; Oliva, M. L.; Sumikawa, J. T.;
556
Toyama, M. H.; Marangoni, S., A Trypsin Inhibitor from Sapindus saponaria L. Seeds:
557
Purification, Characterization, and Activity Towards Pest Insect Digestive Enzyme. Protein
558
J. 2011, 30, 9-19.
559
26. Oliveira, C. F. R.; Vasconcelos, I. M.; Aparicio, R.; Freire, M. d. G. M.; Baldasso, P. A.;
560
Marangoni, S.; Macedo, M. L. R., Purification and biochemical properties of a Kunitz-type
561
trypsin inhibitor from Entada acaciifolia (Benth.) seeds. Process Biochem. 2012, 47, 929-
562
935.
563
27. Oliveira, C. F. R.; Paula Souza, T.; Parra, J. R. P.; Marangoni, S.; Castro Silva-Filho,
564
M.; Macedo, M. L. R., Insensitive trypsins are differentially transcribed during Spodoptera
565
frugiperda adaptation against plant protease inhibitors. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., Part B:
566
Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2013, 165, 19-25.
567
28. Morrison, J. F., The slow-binding and slow, tight-binding inhibition of enzyme-catalysed
568
reactions. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1982, 7, 102-105.
569
29. Bijina, B.; Chellappan, S.; Basheer, S. M.; Elyas, K. K.; Bahkali, A. H.;
570
Chandrasekaran, M., Protease inhibitor from Moringa oleifera leaves: Isolation,
571
purification, and characterization. Process Biochem. 2011, 46, 2291-2300.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
572
30. Jamal, F.; Pandey, P.; Singh, D.; Khan, M. Y., Serine protease inhibitors in plants:
573
nature’s arsenal crafted for insect predators. Phytochem. Rev. 2013, 12, 1-34.
574
31. Iwanaga, S.; Yamasaki, N.; Kimura, M.; Kouzuma, Y., Contribution of Conserved Asn
575
Residues to the Inhibitory Activities of Kunitz-Type Protease Inhibitors from Plants. Biosci.
576
Biotechnol. Biochem. 2005, 69, 220-223.
577
32. Thandapani, P.; O’Connor, T. R.; Bailey, Timothy L.; Richard, S., Defining the
578
RGG/RG Motif. Mol. Cell 2013, 50, 613-623.
579
33. Nakahata, A. M.; Bueno, N. R.; Rocha, H. A. O.; Franco, C. R. C.; Chammas, R.;
580
Nakaie, C. R.; Jasiulionis, M. G.; Nader, H. B.; Santana, L. A.; Sampaio, M. U.; Oliva, M. L.
581
V., Structural and inhibitory properties of a plant proteinase inhibitor containing the RGD
582
motif. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2006, 40, 22-29.
583
34. Frazão, C.; Bento, I.; Costa, J.; Soares, C. M.; Verıś simo, P.; Faro, C.; Pires, E.;
584
Cooper, J.; Carrondo, M. A., Crystal Structure of Cardosin A, a Glycosylated and Arg-Gly-
585
Asp-containing Aspartic Proteinase from the Flowers of Cynara cardunculus L. J. Biol.
586
Chem. 1999, 274, 27694-27701.
587
35. Simões, I.; Mueller, E.-C.; Otto, A.; Bur, D.; Cheung, A. Y.; Faro, C.; Pires, E.,
588
Molecular analysis of the interaction between cardosin A and phospholipase Dα. FEBS J.
589
2005, 272, 5786-5798.
590
36. Cruz-Silva, I.; Gozzo Andrezza, J.; Nunes Viviane, A.; Carmona Adriana, K.; Faljoni-
591
Alario, A.; Oliva Maria Luiza, V.; Sampaio Misako, U.; Sampaio Claudio, A. M.; Araujo
592
Mariana, S., A proteinase inhibitor from Caesalpinia echinata (pau-brasil) seeds for plasma
593
kallikrein, plasmin and factor XIIa. In Biol. Chem., 2004; Vol. 385, p 1083.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 26 of 46
Page 27 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
594
37. Kouzuma, Y.; Suetake, M.; Kimura, M.; Yamasaki, N., Isolation and primary structure
595
of proteinase inhibitors from Erythrina variegata (Linn.) var. Orientalis seeds. Bioscienci
596
Biotechnol Biochem 1992, 56, 1819-1824.
597
38. Bhattacharyya, A.; Babu, C., Exploring the protease mediated conformational stability
598
in a trypsin inhibitor from Archidendron ellipticum seeds. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2006, 44,
599
637-44.
600
39. Oliva, M. L. V.; Souza-Pinto, J. C.; Batista, I. F. C.; Araujo, M. S.; Silveira, V. F.;
601
Auerswald, E. A.; Mentele, R.; Eckerskorn, C.; Sampaio, M. U.; Sampaio, C. A. M.,
602
Leucaena leucocephala serine proteinase inhibitor: primary structure and action on blood
603
coagulation, kinin release and rat paw edema. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1477, 64-74.
604
40. Guimarães, L. C.; Oliveira, C. F. R.; Marangoni, S.; Oliveira, D. G. L.; Macedo, M. L.
605
R., Purification and characterization of a Kunitz inhibitor from Poincianella pyramidalis with
606
insecticide activity against the Mediterranean flour moth. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2015,
607
118, 1-9.
608
41. Delgado-Vargas, F.; López-Valdés, H. E.; Valdés-Rodríguez, S.; Blanco-Labra, A.;
609
Chagolla-López, A.; López-Valenzuela, E. d. J., Isolation and properties of a Kunitz-type
610
protein inhibitor obtained from Pithecellobium dulce seeds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52,
611
6115-6121.
612
42. Chaudhary, N.; Shee, C.; Islam, A.; Ahmad, F.; Yernool, D.; Kumar, P.; Sharma, A.,
613
Purification and characterization of a trypsin inhibitor from Putranjiva roxburghii seeds.
614
Phytochemistry 2008, 69, 2120-6.
615
43. Bezerra, C. S.; Oliveira, C. F. R.; Machado, O. L. T.; Mello, G. S. V.; Pitta, M. G. R.;
616
Rêgo, M. J. B. M.; Napoleão, T. H.; Paiva, P. M. G.; Ribeiro, S. F. F.; Gomes, V. M.; Silva,
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
617
O. N.; Maria-Neto, S.; Franco, O. L.; Macedo, M. L. R., Exploiting the biological roles of the
618
trypsin inhibitor from Inga vera seeds: A multifunctional Kunitz inhibitor. Process Biochem.
619
2016, 51, 792-803.
620
44. Joshi, R. S.; Mishra, M.; Suresh, C. G.; Gupta, V. S.; Giri, A. P., Complementation of
621
intramolecular interactions for structural–functional stability of plant serine proteinase
622
inhibitors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Gen. Subj. 2013, 1830, 5087-5094.
623
45. Cruz, A. C. B.; Massena, F. S.; Migliolo, L.; Macedo, L. L. P.; Monteiro, N. K. V.;
624
Oliveira, A. S.; Macedo, F. P.; Uchoa, A. F.; Grossi de Sá, M. F.; Vasconcelos, I. M.;
625
Murad, A. M.; Franco, O. L.; Santos, E. A., Bioinsecticidal activity of a novel Kunitz trypsin
626
inhibitor from Catanduva (Piptadenia moniliformis) seeds. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013,
627
70, 61-68.
628
46. Macedo, M. L. R.; Garcia, V. A.; Freire, M. G. M.; Richardson, M., Characterization of a
629
Kunitz trypsin inhibitor with a single disulfide bridge from seeds of Inga laurina (SW.) Willd.
630
Phytochemistry 2007, 68, 1104-1111.
631
47. QI, R. F.; SONG, Z. W.; CHI, C. W., Structural Features and Molecular Evolution of
632
Bowman‐Birk Protease Inhibitors and Their Potential Application. Acta Biochim. Biophys.
633
Sin. 2005, 37, 283-292.
634
48. Mithofer, A.; Boland, W., Plant Defense Against Herbivores: Chemical Aspects. Annu.
635
Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63, 431-450.
636
49. Rufino, F. P. S.; Pedroso, V. M. A.; Araujo, J. N.; França, A. F. J.; Rabêlo, L. M. A.;
637
Migliolo, L.; Kiyota, S.; Santos, E. A.; Franco, O. L.; Oliveira, A. S., Inhibitory effects of a
638
Kunitz-type inhibitor from Pithecellobium dumosum (Benth) seeds against insect-pests'
639
digestive proteinases. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 63, 70-76.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 28 of 46
Page 29 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
640
50. Terra, W. R.; Ferreira, C., 11 - Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Digestion. In
641
Insect Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Gilbert, L. I., Ed. Academic Press: San Diego,
642
2012; pp 365-418.
643
51. Yang, L.; Fang, Z.; Dicke, M.; van Loon, J. J.; Jongsma, M. A., The diamondback
644
moth, Plutella xylostella, specifically inactivates Mustard Trypsin Inhibitor 2 (MTI2) to
645
overcome host plant defence. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2009, 39, 55-61.
646
52. Zhu-Salzman, K.; Koiwa, H.; Salzman, R. A.; Shade, R. E.; Ahn, J. E., Cowpea bruchid
647
Callosobruchus maculatus uses a three-component strategy to overcome a plant
648
defensive cysteine protease inhibitor. Insect Mol. Biol. 2003, 12, 135-145.
649
53. Neal, J. J., Brush border membrane and amino acid transport. Arch. Insect Biochem.
650
Physiol. 1996, 32, 55-64.
651
54. Ordóñez-García, M.; Rios-Velasco, C.; Berlanga-Reyes, D. I.; Acosta-Muñiz, C. H.;
652
Salas-Marina, M. Á.; Cambero-Campos, O. J., Occurrence of Natural Enemies of
653
Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Chihuahua, Mexico. Fla. Entomol.
654
2015, 98, 843-847.
655
55. Yuan, J. S.; Köllner, T. G.; Wiggins, G.; Grant, J.; Degenhardt, J.; Chen, F., Molecular
656
and genomic basis of volatile-mediated indirect defense against insects in rice. Plant J.
657
2008, 55, 491-503.
658
56. Kuwar, S. S.; Pauchet, Y.; Vogel, H.; Heckel, D. G., Adaptive regulation of digestive
659
serine proteases in the larval midgut of Helicoverpa armigera in response to a plant
660
protease inhibitor. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2015, 59, 18-29.
661
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure captions Figure 1. PeTI purification steps. A) DEAE-Sepharose chromatogram of Platypodium elegans CE. (B) Trypsin-Sepharose chromatogram of D-III fraction. Inset: 12.5% SDSPAGE of purificated fractions. MW: molecular weight standard; CE: Crude Extract; D-III: DEAE-Sepharose fraction; S-II: Trypsin-Sepharose fraction. Horizontal bars indicate fractions with inhibitory activity. (C) RP-HPLC analysis onto C-18 column at a flow rate of 1 mL/min-1. D) Intact mass of PeTI determined by MALDI-TOF.
Figure 2. Increasing concentrations of PeTI were added to a fixed concentration of trypsin enzyme. Stoichiometry of the PeTI peptidase interaction. Bar indicates standard deviation from triplicate determinations.
Figure 3. Lineweaver–Burk plots are showing simple competitive inhibition of trypsin by PeTI inhibitor. The BAPNA hydrolysis for a constant amount of trypsin (4.2 nM) was measured with increasing concentrations of substrate in the absence or presence of the PeTI (■, 0 nM; ●, 0.15nM; ▼, 0.3nM).
Figure 4. Amino-terminal sequence alignment of PeTI with other Kunitz-type proteinase inhibitors. Consensus symbols below the protein sequences denote fully conserved residue (*), strongly conservation of similar properties (:), weakly conservation of similar properties (.). ªAccession number from NCBI database. PeTI has an RGG/RG motif (highlighted in grey). The multiple alignment shows a glycine-rich region with arginine– glycine-rich (RGG) underlined at the amino (N)-terminal partial of the PeTI. Amino acids Asn12 position (RNG boxes in grey) are double underline (PeTI numbering).
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 30 of 46
Page 31 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 5. Inhibitory activity of PeTI against trypsin-like enzymes from the midgut of the fourth instar larvae of pest insects. The assays were performed using BAPNA as substrate. Values are mean ± standard error of triplicates (N= 5).
Figure 6. Effect of artificial diets supplemented with PeTI on Spodoptera frugiperda larvae development of fifth instar. (A) Larval weight and (B) survival of S. frugiperda larvae. Inset: size difference in the (1) control-fed larvae and (2) PeTI-fed larvae, bar = 1 cm. Values are mean ± standard error for three independent bioassays (N= 30). Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey's multiple comparison. Different letters above columns denote a significant difference between the treatments (p < 0.05).
Figure 7. Effect of PeTI on proteolytic activity in the midgut lumen of fifth instar larvae of Spodoptera frugiperda. (A) Trypsin-like activity and (B) chymotrypsin-like activity from control- and PeTI-fed larvae using BAPNA and SAAPFPNA as substrates, respectively. (C) Inhibition by PeTI of trypsin-like enzymes from control-fed and PeTI-fed larvae, using BAPNA as a substrate. Experiments were carried out in triplicate. The statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey's multiple comparison. Different letters above columns denote a significant difference between the treatments (p < 0.05).
Figure 8. Digestibility of (A) PeTI and (B) BSA by midgut proteases from control- and PeTI-fed larvae of Spodoptera frugiperda. PeTI and BSA were incubated at a ratio of 1:5 (inhibitor: midgut extract) at 30 °C for different times. Digestion products were visualized by SDS-PAGE (15%).
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 32 of 46
Tables Table 1. Purification steps of PeTI Mass
Total protein
Total activity
Purification
Yield
(mg)
(mg)
(TUI/µg) x 10
(Fold)
(%)
Crude Extract
2,000
908
47.22
0.52
1
100
DEAE-Sepharose
399
105.33
10.60
11.01
1.94
22.45
Trypsin-Sepharose
39
7.02
1.60
2.28
4.40
3.40
Steps
6
Specific activity (TUI/mg) x 10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
5
Page 33 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Table 2. Inhibitory activity of PeTI toward serine peptidases
Enzyme
Source
PeTI (0.1 µg) residual activity % ± SE*
Trypsin
Bovine pancreas
30 ± 0.33a
Chymotrypsin Bovine pancreas
98 ± 0.79b
* Values are mean ± standart error (each average is three replicates). Different letters denote a significant difference between the treatments (p < 0.05).
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Table 3. Stability studies of PeTI. Temperature stability after incubation 30 min at the indicated temperature. pH stability of the inhibitor after incubation at the indicated pH for 1h at 37ºC. Trypsin residual activity
Temperature Trypsin residual activity pH (ºC)
(%) *
(%)*
30
100 ± 4.69a
2
97.84 ± 0.06a
37
100 ± 4.88a
3
95.61 ± 1.09a
40
99.55 ± 5.38a
4
95.82 ± 0a
50
100 ± 5.86a
5
98.35 ± 0a
60
99.82 ± 6.03a
6
96.80 ± 1.79a
70
100 ± 6.80a
7
97.93 ± 0.46a
80
72 ± 5.93b
8
98.40 ± 0.99a
90
68.78 ± 6.39b
9
97.41 ± 0.26a
100
25.26 ± 8.71c
10
98.21 ± 0.19a
* Values are mean ± standart error (each average is three replicates). Different letters denote a significant difference between the treatments (p < 0.05).
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 34 of 46
Page 35 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Table 4. Effect of DTT on the stability of PeTI. The inhibitor was treated with different final concentrations of DTT (1, 10 e 100 mM) for 15 – 120 min at 30 ºC.
Reduncing Agent
Trypsin Residual Activity
(DTT)
(%)*
Time
Control
1mM
10mM
100mM
15
96.60 ± 0.90a 96.71 ± 0.93a 51.69 ± 5.44b 52.79 ± 1.03b
30
97.97 ± 0.39a 96.61 ± 0.78a 47.64 ± 4.88b 49.44 ± 5.11b
60
98.64 ± 2.45a 88.91 ± 2.96b 44.21 ± 0.25c 40.33 ± 2.73c
120
99.89 ± 0.35a 83.67 ± 1.98b 36.55 ± 1.80c 27.52 ± 3.12d
* Values are mean ± standart error (each average is three replicates). Different letters denote a significant difference between the treatments (p < 0.05).
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 36 of 46
Table 5. Effect of PeTI on Spodoptera frugiperda development. Total development
Stage (days)* Emergence*
time* Larval
Pupal
Adult
(%) (TDT)
18.00 ±
11.06 ±
6.67 ±
Control
0.2% PeTI
0.47a
0.68a
0.50a
21.36 ±
11.56 ±
6.20 ±
1.08b
0.63a
1.23a
100a
35.10 ± 2.33a
100a
39.10 ± 1.52b
* Values are mean ± standart error (each average is three replicates). Different letters denote a significant difference between the treatments (p < 0.05)
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 37 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Table 6. Amino acid similarity of PeTI with Kunitz trypsin inhibitors from different plant sources. Accession: NCBI Reference Sequence.
Query Accession
Protein
E-value Identity (%) cover
BAA82254.1
Kunitz trypsin inhibitor p20 [Glycine max]
95%
3e-10
55%
BAB82379.1
Mcp20 [Matricaria chamomilla]
95%
3e-10
55%
P83036.2
Kunitz-type trypsin inhibitor LlTI [Leucaena leucocephala]
97%
5e-08
55%
P09941.1
Trypsin inhibitor DE5 alpha chain [Adenanthera pavonina]
97%
9e-08
52%
XP_020224523.1 Kunitz-type trypsin inhibitor KTI1-like [Cajanus cajan]
84%
1e-07
68%
XP_006372631.1 Trypsin protein inhibitor 3 [Populus trichocarpa]
95%
1e-07
54%
ADW95389.1
Kunitz-type trypsin inhibitor [Populus nigra]
95%
1e-07
54%
P83594.1
Factor Xa inhibitor BuXI [Bauhinia ungulata]
97%
1e-07
48%
XP_015938771
Kunitz-type trypsin inhibitor KTI1-like [Arachis duranensis]
95%
3e-07
53%
4J2K_A
Trypsin Inhibitor Ecti [Enterolobium contortisiliquum]
84%
4e-07
61%
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figures Figure 1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 38 of 46
Page 39 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 40 of 46
Page 41 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 4
Protein
Accession numberª
PeTI
1 FVVDTDGDPLRNGGSYYILPVFRGRGGGIEQAAIG------------SEVSKGLPLR
Kunitz trypsin inhibitor p20
BAA82254.1
2 IVFDTEGNPIRNGGTYYVLPVIRGKGGGIEFAKTETETCPLTVVQSPFEVSKGLPLI
Mcp20
BAB82379.1
2 IVFDTEGNPIRNGGTYYVLPVIRGKGGGIEFAKTETETCPLTVVQSPFEVSKGLPLI
Kunitz-type trypsin inhibitor LlTI
P83036.2
2 ILVDLDGDPLYNGMSYYILPVARGKGGGLELARTGSESCPRTVVQTRSETSRGLPAR
Trypsin inhibitor DE5 alpha chain
P09941.1
2 ELLDVDGNFLRNGGSYYIVPAFRGKGGGLELARTGSETCPRTVVQAPAEQSRGLPAR
Kunitz-type trypsin inhibitor KTI1-like
XP_020224523.1
1 DVLDTDGKLLRNGGSYYVVPVKRGSGGGIELAATGNETCPLTVVQSPNKASKGNPCL
Trypsin protein inhibitor 3
XP_006372631.1
2 PVLDIDGEKLVAGTEYYILPVFRGRGGGITMASN-KTSCPLAVVQDRLEVSKGLPLT
Kunitz-type trypsin inhibitor
ADW95389.1
2 PVLDIDGEKLVAGTKYYILPVFRGRGGGITMASN-KTSCPLAVVQDRLEVSKGLPLT
Factor Xa inhibitor BuXI
P83594.1
2 IVLDTDGKPVNNGGQYYIIPAFRGNGGGLELTRVGRETCPHTVVQASSEISNGLPVM
Kunitz-type trypsin inhibitor KTI1-like
XP_015938771
1 ELVDTDGNLIRNGGLYYILPVFRGNGGGIGRTSTGNETCPLTVVQQRSEVDNGLPII
Trypsin Inhibitor Ecti
4J2K_A
2 ELLDSDGDILRNGGTYYILPALRGKGGGLELAKTGDETCPLNVVQARSETKRGRPAI :.* :*. :
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
*
**::*. ** ***:
:
..* *
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 42 of 46
Page 43 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 44 of 46
Page 45 of 46
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
TOC graphic
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 46 of 46