GOVERNMENT & POL ICY
NUMBERS SHRINK AT WEAPONS LABS Congressional BUDGET CUTS, DOWNSIZING hit scientists JEFF JOHNSON, C&EN WASHINGTON JYLLIAN KEMSLEY, C&EN WEST COAST NEWS BUREAU
sional funding for U.S. nuclear weapons science is working its way through the Department of Energy’s three weapons labs. For several years running, Congress has trimmed several hundred million dollars from the Administration’s $6 billion-plus request for spending to maintain the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile. The weapons spending makes up the lion’s share of the $9 billion annual funding for the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), the semiautonomous DOE agency that runs the country’s nuclear weapons operation. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Northern California has been hit the hardest. Livermore management is expected soon to announce the termination of jobs for up to 100 contract employees. This reduction comes on top of layoffs in late May of 440 permanent career employees, including 164 lab scientists. This marks the first time that the lab has laid off permanent staff since 1973, Livermore spokeswoman Susan M. Houghton says. In January, Livermore terminated 450 temporary contract employees. The lab also offered early retirement packages to permanent employees, 215 of whom took the offer, Houghton continues. Adding in normal attrition, contract completion, and retirements, Livermore will be down about 2,000 people from 2006 levels to a total workforce of about 6,600 people by July, she says. The job cuts have been spread across the sciences, and Houghton could not say how many chemists were laid off. Layoff decisions were based not on seniority—110 of the scientists had been at the lab for more than 10
years—but on ability, she adds. The lab retained people with skills it deemed critical for future research programs. For instance, SINCE 2006, Los Alamos has reduced its Livermore spared scientific staff affiliated workforce by about 2,100 staff members, with the National Ignition Facility, a new 46% of whom were technical, according laser facility. to lab figures. It currently employs about Along with the budget cuts, scientists at 8,000 full-time staff and 3,000 contractors. the three weapons labs—Livermore, Los Last year, because of a basically flat budAlamos National Laboratory, and Sandia get and increasing costs, Los Alamos was National Laboratories—face a changing enforced to cut 500 staff through a “volunvironment and an uncertain future. NNSA tary separation program,” explains Kevin leaders have said the weapons budget will Roark, a Los Alamos spokesman. “These not grow in the future and the labs are movreductions, however, along with normal ing to a more diversified research portfolio attrition, meant that we did not have to rethat includes a greater share of nonweapons sort to a layoff,” he says. work (C&EN, Nov. 19, 2007, page 12). “All this is in the past,” Roark continues. But Livermore lab officials stress “We are not going to do a that the current layoffs are due to separation program again.” LAYOFFS Last budget constraints over the past Paralleling Houghton’s picmonth, staff several years and are not a result ture for Livermore, Roark positions were of NNSA’s future plans. Livermore says Los Alamos is maintaincut at Lawrence was hit by a $280 million shortfall Livermore National ing its workforce through in its $1.6 billion operating budget normal attrition and “straLaboratory. tegic hiring” and “is now in a good position to manage our workforce.” Sandia officials also note a drop in employees over the past few years. They say Sandia’s overall workforce has declined by 477 positions since fiscal 2006 and project a drop in staff from approximately 8,400 full-time employees today to about 7,800 in 2010. This comes along with a reduction in the direct nuclear weapons workforce of 18% since 2004, Sandia Labs Director Thomas O. Hunter said, speaking to a Senate panel in April. Direct weapons work is now less than half of Sandia’s budget. Late last year, Sandia announced 110 positions would be eliminated over the months that followed, which LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY
A CONTINUOUS reduction in congres-
due to a double whammy of budget cuts and increased management fees, taxes, and benefits costs related to the recent shift in lab management from the nonprofit University of California to a consortium made up of private companies and UC. “We believe that we are positioned correctly to avoid any future involuntary separations,” Houghton says, although she leaves the door open to further staff reductions through attrition. Similar staff and budget reductions are taking place at Los Alamos and Sandia.
WWW.C E N- ONLI NE .ORG
30
J UNE 3 0, 20 0 8
“What I’ve seen over the last few years is what I call the growth of ‘we can’t do it unless you’ve got an explicit programmatic justification,’ ” Grant says. “It used to be ‘sure, we’ll do it unless there’s a reason we shouldn’t.’ ” Grant notes that many research programs at Livermore seem to be in limbo. “Right now, they haven’t closed down
they attributed to lab streamlining and a shift in needs within the lab. After attrition and transfers within the lab, however, the jobs of only 25 people were terminated. Overall, NNSA is headed for significant change. In the next decade, NNSA Administrator Thomas P. D’Agostino has announced, the size of the nuclear weapons infrastructure will be reduced by 30% and the staff by 20 to 30%. The staff reduction, he said, will occur mostly through retirements and a shift from weapons work to nuclear nonproliferation programs and other nuclear-related but not nuclear weapons activities. The infrastructure reductions will include demolition of some 600 buildings and elimination of redundant activities at some labs (C&EN, Dec. 24, 2007, page 29). D’Agostino’s plan to downsize and streamline the labs will also reduce the number of nuclear weapons maintained by NNSA and could include developing a new nuclear weapon, the “reliable replacement warhead,” which would be easier and cheaper to maintain and keep secure.
programs and said ‘we’re definitely not going to do this.’ But there isn’t any real support for them, either,” he says, adding that three weapons labs really need more direction from above. “I think for the labs, a lot of it boils down to Congress and DOE deciding what they really want to support and what the national labs should be as institutions,” Grant says. ■
CONGRESS has been unwilling to fund the
Ingenious Tosoh ingenuity produces a system with unparalleled: • Reproducibility • Reliability • Linearity • Speed
EcoSEC ® GPC System
TOSOH BIOSCIENCE LLC 156 Keystone Drive Montgomeryville, PA 18936, USA Tel: 215-283-5000 / 800-366-4875 Fax: 215-283-5035 email:
[email protected] WWW.C E N- ONLI NE .ORG
31
J UNE 3 0, 20 0 8
When you couple the EcoSEC GPC system with our new TSK-GEL SuperMultiporeHZ columns, the results are stunning.
Call or write for more information or to arrange a demo in your lab. www.tosohbioscience.com Tosoh Bioscience, TSK-GEL and EcoSEC are registered trademarks of Tosoh Corporation.
REQUEST MOR E AT ADI NFONOW.ORG
warhead, however, and has been lukewarm to the overall transformation plan. Late this month and for the second year in a row, the House Committee on Appropriations’ Subcommittee on Energy & Water refused to fund a $10 million Bush Administration request to study the warhead. It is also likely congressional funding for the weapons labs will continue to decline. The appropriations subcommittee cut the Administration’s request for fiscal 2009 by $400 million to $6.2 billion, which means a basically flat budget since 2006. The layoffs, budget cuts, and shifts in funding are stressful and confusing for lab scientists, who worry about the loss of scientific capability at the labs and cuts to core lab programs. “Morale is terrible,” says Jeffrey D. Colvin, a physicist who works in Livermore’s Chemistry, Materials, Earth & Life Sciences Directorate. “It’s very depressing even for those of us not getting notices. We have to say good-bye to long-term colleagues.” A 25-year lab veteran, Colvin survived the cuts in May. Keith E. Grant was employed by Livermore for 36 years before he was laid off in May. A physicist who worked in atmospheric chemistry, he says a big part of why he stayed so long at the lab is because of the interesting work he was able to do there, but he worries about the lab’s future.
